Trumps buitenlandbeleid heeft de wereld naar de rand van WOIII gebracht…….

Volkomen
terecht waarschuwt Darius Shahtahmasebi de wereld voor het gevaar van
het ‘buitenlandbeleid’ dat de Trump administratie voert.

Met
veel voorbeelden geeft Shahtahmasebi aan dat de VS ons op de rand van
Wereldoorlog III heeft gebracht en er niet veel voor nodig is om deze
oorlog daadwerkelijk te laten losbarsten……

Waar blijven de demonstraties tegen het terreurbeleid van de VS, die ons steeds dichter bij WOIII brengen???

Verdere
woorden overbodig, lees en oordeel zelf:

How
Donald Trump’s Policies Have Brought Us to the Brink of World War 3

February
20, 2018 at 11:55 

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — On
February 7, 2018, the U.S.-led coalition in Syria
 conducted
air and artillery strikes
 against
what were believed to be pro-government forces in response to an
“unprovoked attack” launched by these pro-regime troops. Not long
after, reports
 began
emerging
 that
significant numbers of Russian personnel were included in the over
100 dead and wounded. While Russia denied this at first, eventually,
the accepted version of events on both sides was that there were some
Russian nationals who did lose their lives in Syria. These Russians
are arguably mercenaries and contractors, not official troops.

This
is not the first time the U.S.-led coalition has struck
pro-government forces in Syria. Aside from Donald Trump’s 
grandiose
strike
 on
a Syrian airbase in April of last year, U.S. forces also 
conducted
multiple strikes
 against
Syrian and Iranian-backed forces as these factions began to encircle
the American military’s presence at a base in al-Tanf.

Donald
Trump has famously relaxed the
 Obama-era
restrictions
 on
calling in airstrikes, meaning commanders on the battlefield can call
in airstrikes at their disposal without any oversight. Previously, an
airstrike could not be launched on a whim and was required to go
through certain protocols before it could be delivered. Now, even
associated forces can call in American airstrikes on the battlefield.
The most infamous example of this is when Iraqi commanders called in
a U.S. strike that ended up killing well over
 200
civilians in a single bombardment
.

Barely
a week after Trump’s Syria strike in April, the U.S.
military
 dropped a
$450,000 bomb in Afghanistan dubbed the “Mother of all bombs”
(MOAB). It soon transpired that the decision to drop the bomb was not
made by Trump himself as commander-in-chief but by
 Gen.
John Nicholson
,
commander of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

It’s
time to ask yourself: Are you comfortable with commanders on the
battlefield calling in airstrikes even if those airstrikes could
potentially kill personnel on the ground belonging to another nuclear
power?

Last
Tuesday, Wisconsin Democrat Mark Pocan
 told
the 
Nation
 that “Congress
has never authorized force against Syrian, Turkish, Yemeni Houthi,
Russian, Iranian, or North Korean forces. Yet reportedly, a 
secret
administration memo may claim the legal justification to do just
that: attack Syrian, North Korean, and other forces without any
congressional authorization.” 
[emphasis
added]

According
to 
Lawfare
,
a lawsuit required the government to reveal a list of documents
relating to the April Syria strike, but not the actual documents
themselves. The court-ordered directions forced the government to
reveal that the seven-page secret memo Pocan was referring to was
drafted up by administration lawyers on April 6, 2017, just before
Trump’s infamous strike. The government’s declarations revealed
that only a few of the words on one of the memo’s pages are
classified, and they are related to facts, not legalities. Still, the
administration refuses to disclose the memo to the public, claiming
the document is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act.

I
am also concerned that this legal justification may now become
precedent for additional executive unilateral military action,
including this week’s U.S. airstrikes in Syria against pro-Assad
forces or even an extremely risky ‘bloody nose’ strike against
North Korea,”
 Senator
Tim Kaine (D-Va) said last week.

In
early February, the Pentagon released its much anticipated
2018
 Nuclear
Posture Review
.
From the 
Washington
Post’s 
Katrina
vanden Heuvel’s 
assessment:

The
review reaffirms the United States is ready to use nuclear weapons
first in an alarmingly wide range of scenarios. It remains ‘the
policy of the United States to retain some ambiguity regarding the
precise circumstances’ that might lead to a nuclear response. The
United States 
reserves the right to unleash
nuclear weapons first in ‘extreme circumstances’ to defend the
‘vital interests’ not only of the United States but also of its
‘allies and partners’ — a total of some 30 countries.
 ‘Extreme
circumstances,’ the review states explicitly, include 
significant
non-nuclear attacks,’ including conventional attacks on ‘allied
or partner civilian population or infrastructure.’ 
The
United States also 
maintains a ‘portion of
its nuclear forces’ on daily alert, with the option of launching
those forces ‘promptly.’ 
[emphasis
added]

The
U.S. has an active stockpile of at least 4,000 nuclear weapons,
rivaled only by Russia. 
According
to the Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR)
,
a “limited” regional exchange of nuclear weapons could force one
billion people to the point of starvation, and a week-long “regional”
encounter could kill far more than died during World War II.

As
Albert Einstein
 famously
said
, “I
know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World
War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

Heuvel
correctly summarized the current nuclear strategy:

In
sum, the United States is building a new generation of nuclear
weapons and delivery systems, will deploy more usable nuclear weapons
in ‘forward’ areas, remains committed to possible ‘first use’
of nuclear weapons even against non-nuclear attacks in defense of 30
countries, retains missiles on active alert ready to launch, is
skeptical of the possibility of any progress in arms control and is
hostile to the global movement to make nuclear weapons illegal. All
this as tensions with Russia and China rise, relations with North
Korea remain literally explosive, and the nuclear deal with Iran
stays under constant assault from the president.

One
thing we do know is that the U.S. is
 openly
considering nuclear strikes
 in
response to cyber-attacks, which could be conducted by anyone from
lone-wolf hackers to
 Iran,
North Korea, Russia, or China. We also know that the Trump
administration has been weighing a “limited” 
strike
on North Korea
 for
some time now, even as North and South Korea pursue a peaceful
dialogue of their own. Even now, the U.S. continues
to 
position nuclear-capable
B-52 and B-2 bombers around the Korean peninsula. The B-2 is the most
advanced bomber in the United States air force, capable of dropping
the military department’s biggest bomb, which weighs in at around
14,000 kilograms.

This
is a recipe for disaster. Donald Trump isn’t bringing the troops
home and focusing on “making America great again.” According to
the
 Department
of Defense
,
American troop deployments to the Middle East had increased 33
percent by the end of last year.

It’s
time for both sides of the political coin to confront their delusions
and face reality. Donald Trump is by far the
 most
hawkish, trigger-happy president
 to
have ever been sworn into office, which is no easy feat considering
his predecessors. His policies are leading the United States down a
dangerous path that could see a miscalculated strike on Syria,
Russia, Iran, North Korea, or even China — whether by mistake or by
design. Considering that strikes have already been underway in Syria
against the Syrian government and its allies, including Russia, these
policies are likely to lead to something far more explosive down the
line.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

=============================

PS: heb een bericht over de situatie in het Syrische Ghouta in voorbereiding. Ghouta waar de enorme westerse hysterie en hypocrisie in de reguliere media weer eens heeft toegeslagen, dit gesteund door het grootste deel van de westerse politici, terwijl men weet dat de moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen van Al Qaida, al-Nusra (in feite ‘Al Qaida Syrië’) en als het even kan de White Helmets tekeer gaan tegen de bevolking……. Waar is de kritiek op terreurgroep Al Qaida gebleven?? Alle berichten over ‘de slachting’ in Ghouta komen dan ook van die terreurgroepen en van Al Qaida’s White Helmets, met door hen geregisseerde video’s en hoorspelen……. Bij deze (op 25 februari 2018): ‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

Als de VS niet de VS was, zou de Verenigde Staten dit gestolen land bombarderen………

Zoals op deze pek al veelvuldig gesteld: de VS is de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, het middels de grootste genocide ooit* gestolen land dat alleen al vanaf WOII meer dan 22 miljoen mensen vermoordde……………..

Gisteren kwam Anti-Media met een artikel onder de titel: ‘If America Wasn’t America, the United States Would Be Bombing It’. Hoewel ik de opzet van deze zin begrijp, klopt deze toch niet helemaal. Immers de VS laat andere terreurstaten gewoon hun gang gaan, zolang ze maar de VS steunen…. Neem Israël en Saoedi-Arabië, die zelfs door de VS worden gesteund in de terreur die ze brengen, en door diezelfde VS worden ontzien in de VN Veiligheidsraad, als het om resoluties tegen de smerige, bloederige praktijken gaat waar deze 2 landen zich keer op keer schuldig aan maken……

Maar geen gezeik: zeker niet als je ziet dat de VS haar illegale oorlogen verdedigt door te stellen dat het voor de verdrukte volkeren opkomt en democratie wil brengen**.

Darius Shahtahmasebi schreef het artikel n.a.v. een opiniestuk van voormalig VS regeringsadviseur Edward Luttwak. Deze oorlogshitser stelde in de kop dat het tijd is voor de VS om Noord-Korea te bombarderen.

Lullig genoeg voor Luttwak, gebruikte hij argumenten die nu juist van toepassing zijn op de wandel en handel van de VS… Zo geeft Shahtahmasebi een aantal voorbeelden, zoals het gebruik van atoombommen door de VS tegen Hiroshima en Nagasaki, terwijl deze aanvallen totaal onnodig waren zoals o.a. de hoge VS militairen Nimitz en Halsey destijds betoogden.

Lees het volgende artikel van Shahtahmasebi en oordeel zelf:

If
America Wasn’t America, the United States Would Be Bombing It

February
12, 2018 at 1:00 pm

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — On
January 8, 2018, former government advisor Edward Luttwak wrote
an
 opinion
piece
 for Foreign
Policy 
titled
“It’s Time to Bomb North Korea.”

Luttwak’s
thesis is relatively straightforward. There is a government out there
that may very soon acquire nuclear-weapons capabilities, and this
country cannot be trusted to responsibly handle such a stockpile. The
responsibility to protect the world from a rogue nation cannot be
argued with, and we understandably have a duty to ensure the future
of humanity.

However,
there is one rogue nation that continues to hold the world ransom
with its nuclear weapons supply. It is decimating non-compliant
states left, right, and center. This country must be stopped dead in
its tracks before anyone turns to the issue of North Korea.

In
August of 1945, this rogue nation dropped two atomic bombs on
civilian targets, not military targets, completely
obliterating
 between 135,000
and 300,000 Japanese civilians in just these two acts alone. Prior to
this event, this country killed even more civilians in the
 infamous
firebombing
 of
Tokyo and other areas of Japan, dropping close to 500,000 cylinders
of napalm and petroleum jelly on some of Japan’s most densely
populated areas.

Recently,
historians have become more open to the possibility that dropping the
atomic bombs in Hiroshima and Nagasaki was not actually necessary to
end World War II. This has also been confirmed by those who actually
took part in it. As
 the Nation explained:

Fleet
Adm. Chester Nimitz, Commander in Chief of the Pacific Fleet, stated
in a public address at the Washington Monument two months after the
bombings that 
the
atomic bomb played no decisive part, from a purely military
standpoint, in the defeat of Japan…’ 
Adm.
William “Bull” Halsey Jr., Commander of the US Third Fleet,
stated publicly in 1946 that 
the
first atomic bomb was an unnecessary experiment…. 
It
was a mistake to ever drop it…. [the scientists] had this toy and
they wanted to try it out, so they dropped it…” 
[emphasis
added]

A
few months’ prior, this rogue country’s
 invasion of
the Japanese island of Okinawa also claimed at least one quarter of
Okinawa’s population. The Okinawan people have been protesting this
country’s military presence ever since. The most recent ongoing
protest
 has
lasted well over 5,000 days
 in
a row.

This
nation’s bloodlust continued well after the end of World War II.
Barely half a decade later, this country bombed North Korea into
complete oblivion, 
destroying over
8,700 factories, 5,000 schools, 1,000 hospitals, 600,000 homes,
and 
eventually
killing
 off
as much as 20 percent of the country’s population. As the 
Asia
Pacific Journal
 has
noted, the assaulting country dropped so many bombs that they
eventually ran out of targets to hit, turning to bomb the irrigation
systems, instead:

By
the fall of 1952, there were 
no effective
targets left for US planes to hit
.
Every significant town, city and industrial area in North Korea had
already been bombed. In the spring of 1953, the Air Force targeted
irrigation dams on the Yalu River, both to destroy the North Korean
rice crop and to pressure the Chinese, who would have to supply more
food aid to the North. Five reservoirs were hit, flooding thousands
of acres of farmland, inundating whole towns and laying waste to the
essential food source for millions of North Koreans.” 
[emphasis
added]

This
was just the beginning. Having successfully destroyed the future
North Korean state, this country moved on to the rest of East Asia
and Indo-China, too. As 
Rolling
Stone’s
 Matt
Taibbi
 has explained:

We
[this loose cannon of a nation] dumped 20 million gallons of toxic
herbicide on Vietnam from the air, just to make the shooting easier
without all those trees, an insane plan to win ‘hearts and minds’
that has left about a million still disabled from defects and disease
– including about 100,000 children, even decades later, little kids
with misshapen heads, webbed hands and fused eyelids writhing on
cots, our real American legacy, well out of view, of course.”

This
mass murder led to the deaths of between 1.5 million and 3.8 million
people,
 according to
the 
Washington
Post
.
More bombs were dropped on Vietnam than were unleashed during
the
 entire
conflict in World War II
.
While this was going on, this same country was also
 secretly
bombing
 Laos
and Cambodia, too, where there are over
 80
million unexploded bombs
 still
killing people to this day.

This
country also decided to bomb
 YugoslaviaPanama,
and 
Grenada before
invading Iraq in the early 1990s***. Having successfully bombed Iraqi
infrastructure, this country then punished Iraq’s entire civilian
population with brutal sanctions. At the time, the
U.N.
 estimated that
approximately 1.7 million Iraqis had died as a result,
 including
500,000 to 600,000 children
.
Some years later, a prominent medical journal 
attempted
to absolve the cause
 of
this infamous history by refuting the statistics involved despite the
fact that, when interviewed during the sanctions-era, Bill Clinton’s
secretary of state,

Madeleine
Albright, 
intimated that
to this rogue government, the deaths of half a million children were
“worth it” as the “price” Iraq needed to pay. In other words,
whether half a million children died or not was irrelevant to this
bloodthirsty nation, which barely blinked while carrying out this
murderous policy.

This
almighty superpower then invaded Iraq again in 2003 and plunged the
entire 
region
into chaos
.
At the end of May 2017, the Physicians for Social Responsibility
(PSR) released a
 study concluding
that the death toll from this violent nation’s 2003 invasion of
Iraq had led to over one million deaths and that at least one-third
of them were caused directly by the invading force.

Not
to mention this country also invaded Afghanistan prior to the
invasion of Iraq (even though the militants 
plaguing
Afghanistan
 were
originally trained and financed by this warmongering nation). It
then 
went
on to bomb
 Yemen,
Syria, Libya, Pakistan, Somalia, and the 
Philippines.

Libya famously had
one of the highest standards of living in the region. It had
state-assisted healthcare, education, transport, and affordable
housing. It is now a lawless war-zone 
rife
with extremism
 where
slaves are 
openly
traded
 like
commodities amid the power vacuum created as a direct result of the
2011 invasion.

In
2017, the commander-in-chief of this violent nation took the
monumental death and destruction to a new a level by
 removing
the restrictions
 on
delivering airstrikes, which resulted in
 thousands upon thousands of
civilian deaths. Before that, in the first six months of 2017, this
country
 dropped
over 20,650 bombs
,
a monumental increase from the year that preceded it.

Despite
these statistics, all of the above conquests are mere child’s play
to this nation. The real prize lies in some of the more defiant and
more powerful states, which this country has already unleashed a
containment strategy upon. This country has deployed its own troops
all across the 
border
with Russia 
even
though it 
promised
in the early 1990s
 it
would do no such thing. It also has a specific policy of 
containing
Russia’s close ally, China,
 all
the while threatening China’s borders with talks of direct strikes
on North Korea (again, remember it already did so in the 1950s).

This
country also elected a president who not only believes it is okay
to 
embrace
this rampantly violent militarism
 but
who openly calls 
other
countries
 “shitholes”
– the very same term that aptly describes the way this country has
treated the rest of the world for decades on end. This same president
also reportedly once asked 
three
times in a meeting
,
If
we have nuclear weapons, why don’t we use them
?”
and shortly after proposed a policy to
 remove
the constraints
 protecting
the world from his dangerous supply of advanced nuclear weaponry.

When
it isn’t directly bombing a country, it is also 
arming
radical insurgent groups
,
creating instability, and directly 
overthrowing
governments
 through
its 
covert
operatives
 on
the ground.

If
we have any empathy for humanity, it is clear that this country must
be stopped. It cannot continue to act like this to the detriment of
the rest of the planet and the safety and security of the rest of us.
This country 
openly
talks
 about
using its nuclear weapons, has used them before, and has continued to
use all manner of weapons unabated in the years since while
threatening to expand the use of these weapons to other countries.

Seriously,
if North Korea seems like a threat, imagine how the rest of the world
feels while watching one country violently take on the rest of the
planet single-handedly, leaving nothing but destruction in its wake
and promising nothing less than a nuclear holocaust in the years to
come.

There
is only one country that has done and that continues to do the very
things North Korea is being accused of doing.

Take
as much time as you need for that to resonate.

Op-ed
Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

==============================================

*    De grootste genocide ooit werd uitgevoerd in Noord-, Midden- en Zuid-Amerika

**  ‘Democratie brengen’, zelfs in landen waar NB een democratisch gekozen regering zat of zit, neem Syrië en Oekraïne (onder Janoekovytsj), waar de CIA eerst een opstand organiseerde, om deze te laten eindigen in een staatsgreep; deze zaak lukte wel in Oekraïne, maar niet in Syrië, waardoor deze landen wel in oorlog raakten en in chaos werden gestort……

*** De oorlog van de VS (NAVO) tegen Joegoslavië vond plaats nadat de VS op 17 januari 1991 onder de oude Bush-slachter (George H.W. Bush) de eerste VS oorlog tegen Irak begon, dit in tegenstelling tot wat Shahtahmasebi daar hierboven over heeft geschreven.

En om nog even te herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS, die niet op een illegale oorlog meer of minder kijkt:  ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States

Zie ook: ‘Top VS generaal stelt dat er een grote oorlog met Rusland op komst is, ofwel: WOIII……

        en: ‘Trumps atoomknop is groter dan die van Kim Yung-un, bovendien werkt de VS knop wel……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘VN chef Guterres geeft alarmcode rood af voor de wereld in 2018 en niet alleen vanwege het milieu of klimaat……

        en: ‘Trumps uitlating over de atoomknop en de onverschilligheid bij zijn achterban, een dictatuur waardig………

        en: ‘VS op weg naar daadwerkelijk gebruik van het kernwapen…………..‘ (plus twee andere Engelstalige artikelen)

        en: ‘VS sluit een nucleaire aanval niet uit als een mogelijke reactie op een ‘cyberaanval…….’

        en: ‘NAVO oefent op een nucleaire aanval tegen ‘een denkbeeldige vijand’, ofwel Rusland……….‘ (de NAVO is in feite een organisatie van de VS en is daarmee een organisatie die dan ook precies doet wat de VS wil en de VS helpt in haar grootschalige terreur )

       en: ‘Pompeo (CIA opperhoofd met koperen fluit): heeft alle aanwijzingen dat Rusland de midterm verkiezingen zal manipuleren……

En om nog even te herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS, die niet op een illegale oorlog meer of minder kijkt:  ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States

Dan nog over het bedreigen van Noord-Korea door Trump met ‘Fire and Fury): ‘Noord-Korea verkeerd begrepen: het land wordt bedreigd door de VS, dat alleen deze eeuw al minstens 4 illegale oorlogen begon……..‘   en: ‘Noord-Korea wil graag overleggen met de VS dat alweer de boot afhoudt………

VS maakte 10 keer meer slachtoffers, dan de reguliere media rapporteerden……..

Afgelopen maandag kwam Anti-Media met een samenvatting van een studie, gemaakt door Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR). De conclusdie van die studie: de VS maakte met haar ‘oorlog tegen terreur’* 10 keer zoveel slachtoffers, dan gemeld door de reguliere (massa-) media…….

Sinds 2001 zouden er al 2 miljoen slachtoffers te betreuren zijn door de terreur die de VS liet neerdalen in haar illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libie en Syrië…… Overigens geen schokkend nieuws, vele deskundigen hebben deze 2 miljoen vermoordde slachtoffers al meer dan een halfjaar geleden gemeld.

Wel vreemd is de constatering van  PSR dat tenminste één derde van alle slachtoffers direct zijn vermoord (dat woord wordt gemeden in de studie) door de bezettende machten…….. Terwijl het voor iedereen duidelijk is dat alle slachtoffers zijn te danken aan de agressie van de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, de VS! Immers als de VS niet had ingegrepen en/of opstanden op touw had gezet, waren die 2 miljoen mensen niet het slachtoffer geworden van (VS) moord…..

In feite is die schatting van 2 miljoen slachtoffers aan de lage kant, dat erkent ook PSR. Wat PSR niet meldt is de steun van de VS (nu en/of in het verleden) voor IS, Al Qaida en andere terreurgroepen. Door deze steun zijn ook nog eens een enorm aantal mensen aan hun (vaak vreselijk) einde gekomen…….

Nafeez Ahmed werd door de Guardian de staat opgeschopt, vanwege zijn berichtgeving waarin hij de motieven gaf voor de Israëlische aanval op de Gazastrook in 2014. Deze Ahmed schat het aantal slachtoffers gemaakt door ingrijpen van de VS en haar hielenlikkers, op meer dan 4 miljoen……* Al moet dan weer gezegd worden, dat hij de Golfoorlog van 1991 tegen Irak en de slachtoffers door de VS boycot van Irak in de jaren daarna heeft meegerekend.

Dan zijn er nog de geheime operaties van de VS en de illegale standrechtelijke executies middels drones, waarbij meer dan 90% van de slachtoffers niet eens verdacht was/is…… De cijfers over het aantal doden die door drones vallen zijn nog moeilijker te achterhalen. Het is nog maar zelden, dat in de reguliere westerse media wordt bericht over deze ronduit terreuraanvallen van de VS……… Kortom zelfs het cijfer van 4 miljoen is hoogstwaarschijnlijk nog aan de lage kant…….

Lees de volgende (verder) uitstekende uiteenzetting van Darius Shahtahmasedi:

Those
Killed by US-Led ‘War on Terror’ 10x Higher Than Reported by the
Media

July
3, 2017 at 11:59 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA) — At
the end of May, the Washington D.C.-based Physicians for Social
Responsibility (PSR) released a
 study concluding
that the death toll from the American-led “War on Terror” could
be as high as two million just since the years following the 9/11
attacks.

The
study, entitled “Body Count,” is 97 pages long and involved
tallying up the total number of civilian casualties from U.S.-led
adventures in Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan. Not surprisingly, the
mainstream media has paid close to zero attention to this report
despite the high-profile nature of the group that produced it (they
shared in the 1985 
Nobel
Peace Prize
 with
the International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War >> IPPNW).

The
study found that in many instances, previous estimates had “grossly”
underestimated the body count. According to the researchers:

The
figure is approximately 10 times greater than that of which the
public, experts and decision makers are aware of and propagated by
the media and major NGOs. And this is only a conservative estimate
.”

The
report also found previous estimates had whitewashed the culpability
and responsibility of those who had done the killing. In regards to
the Iraq War, PSR found that despite “all the
inaccuracies…the answers still allowed for the conclusion that
approximately one third of all victims of violence 
had
been directly killed by the occupation forces.”
 [emphasis
added]

The
U.S. and its allies (particularly the United Kingdom) also bear the
ultimate blame for civilian deaths, specifically, following the 2003
invasion. It was their presence that unleashed the chaos to begin
with, as
 noted by
independent journalist Ben Swann:

Before
the 2003 U.S. invasion, do you know how many suicide attacks there
were in Iraq? None. In the country’s history there had never been
one. But since the 2003 invasion, there have been 1,892.”

The
PSR study also found some momentous flaws with a number of other
death toll studies. For example, a paper in the New England
Journal of Medicine
 ignored the areas of Iraq that were
subject to the heaviest violence, including Baghdad, the
capital city of Iraq.

Overall,
the PSR speculated that the most accurate number for the death
toll in Iraq since 2003 is about one million. Together with a
conservative Afghanistan death toll of 220,000 and a Pakistani death
toll of 80,000, the PSR found that the number of deaths from the “War
on Terror” was at least 1.3 million. However, PSR concluded that
the real figure could easily be “in excess of two million.”

Nafeez
Ahmed, a journalist who was axed from
the 
Guardian for exposing Israel’s
motives for bombing the Gaza strip in 2014, has compiled a death toll
of his own, noting that the war in Iraq did not begin in 2003.

The
war on Iraq did not begin in 2003, but in 1991 with the first Gulf
War, which was followed by the UN sanctions regime.
” Ahmed writes.

Noting
that the U.N. has
 found these
draconian sanctions were responsible for the deaths of approximately
1.7 million civilians (between 500,000 and 600,000 of whom were
children), Ahmed found that from 1990 to the present day, the U.S.
has realistically killed close to three million Iraqi civilians.

All
in all, Ahmed finds that the death toll from the U.S.-led “War on
Terror” since 1990 is close to four million – the majority of
whom would undoubtedly be Muslims given Iraq, Pakistan, and
Afghanistan are majority Muslim nations.

Any
criticism of Islam and its 1.6 billion adherents that ignores this
devastating recent history is a dangerous and illusory waste of time.

Last
year, leaked ISIS documents
 revealed that
its members had an extremely poor understanding of Islam. This was
further
 confirmed by Lydia
Wilson of 
The Nation,
who interviewed captured ISIS fighters herself:

Why
did he [an ISIS fighter] do all these things? Many assume that these
fighters are motivated by a belief in the Islamic State, a caliphate
ruled by a caliph with the traditional title Emir al-Muminiin,
‘Commander of the faithful,’ a role currently held by Abu Bakr
al-Baghdadi; that fighters all over the world are flocking to the
area for a chance to fight for this dream. 
But
this just doesn’t hold for the prisoners we are interviewing. They
are woefully ignorant about Islam and have difficulty answering
questions about Sharia law, militant jihad, and the
caliphate
.” [emphasis
added]

According
to Wilson’s interviews with ISIS fighters, one main reason for
their radicalization was not their religion, but George W. Bush’s
invasion of Iraq.

“‘The
Americans came,’ [one fighter] said. ‘They took away Saddam, but
they also took away our security. I didn’t like Saddam, we were
starving then, but at least we didn’t have war. When you came here,
the civil war started.’”

If
a few ragtag Muslims committing heinous acts of terrorism on Western
soil are enough to radicalize Westerners to
 form
resistant groups
,
surely one can understand the sheer horror and plight of a group of
people who have been killed by the millions in the past two or three
decades over nothing more than a geopolitical chess game of 
oil,
money, and natural gas
.

 Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

===========================================

* Onder die 4 miljoen, meer dan 500.000 kinderen die werden getroffen door de boycot en daardoor zijn overleden. Massamoordenaar Albright, verantwoordelijk democraat, liet achteraf weten dat die 500.000 kindermoorden de moeite waard zijn geweest…….

Zie ook:

Afghanistan: VS gaat terreur vergroten

VS gaf sinds 2001 meer dan 5,9 biljoen dollar uit aan oorlogen, ofwel: $ 5,933.000.000.000…….

VS bombardeert ziekenhuis Artsen zonder Grenzen in Kunduz, 9 medewerkers van deze organisatie kwamen om het leven……..
       

VS bombardeerde het Artsen zonder Grenzen ziekenhuis in Kunduz niet per ongeluk………. Ofwel: VS terreur op grote schaal, over een lange periode!!

Artsen zonder Grenzen ziekenhuis: tijdens bombardement werden vluchtenden vanaf relatief korte afstand beschoten……. Vergissing??

VS standrechtelijke executies: voor de zoveelste keer niet-verdachten slachtoffer drone-aanval >> 15 Afghaanse politieagenten vermoord….

Afghaanse oorlog in het 17de jaar: Taliban nu sterker dan eerder sinds de VS de oorlog van 2001 begon

Ten Broeke (VVD) steunt beslissing Trump de illegale oorlog in Afghanistan te laten voortduren en zo meer terreur te creëren……..

Afghanistan: de VS stelt de papaverteelt veilig voor de komende jaren………..

VS test grootste niet-nucleaire bom in testgebied….. Afghanistan!!‘ (o.a. Afghanistan is een testgebied voor de wapenfabrikanten en daaronder versta ik ook de fabrikanten van rollend, varend en vliegend oorlogstuig)

Military-Industrial Complex Stock Prices Surge After Trump’s Afghan War Speech

Luchtmacht VS gooide in augustus meer dan 500 bommen op Afghanistan……….

Trump gaat oorlog in Afghanistan winnen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

6 Reasons Why Trump’s Afghanistan “Policy” Is Not a Deep State Plot

14 Times Trump Warned Against Doing What He Just Did in Afghanistan

=========================================

Hier nog een paar voorbeelden van VS terreur:

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..‘ (tot het jaar 2000)

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……‘ (bericht van 5 oktober 2018)