Syrië wacht andermaal een geplande gasaanval van ‘gematigde rebellen……..’

Nu
de aandacht voor Trump en Kim wegebt en men er algemeen vanuit gaat
dat Assad niet zal aftreden als president, sterker nog: dat hij bij
nu te houden verkiezingen zelfs met nog meer stemmen verkozen zal
worden, is de kans levensgroot dat er weer een gebeurtenis staat te
wachten, die in het westen tot hysterische reacties zal leiden……

Volgens
het Russische ministerie van defensie, in de persoon van Lavrov’s
(minister van defensie) woordvoerder en officier Igor Konashenkov, staat de
‘gematigde rebellen’ groep het vrije Syrische leger (psychopathische
moordenaars) op het punt een voor de wereld in elkaar gedraaid scenario
uit voeren, waar (alweer) een gifgasaanval aan het reguliere Syrische
leger (‘en dus’ Assad..) zal worden toegeschreven…… Een dergelijke gang van zaken noemt men een ‘false flag’ operatie, operaties die vooral goed door de VS worden beheerst.

Men kan het eenvoudigweg niet verkroppen dat Assad in feite de oorlog in Syrië voor zijn volk heeft gewonnen dat was immers niet de opzet van de o.a. door de VS georganiseerde opstand in Syrië (de eerste voorbereidingen daartoe werden al in 2006 onder Bush genomen)…..

De
grote westerse radiostations (inclusief Radio1, al is dat niet groot, en de ‘onafhankelijke’
zendgemachtigden op die zender) citeren 9 van de 10 keer als het over
Syrië gaat, het Syrische Observatorium voor Mensenrechten (SOHR), een
vertegenwoordiger van de terreurgroepen in Syrië, die zoals gezegd
door het westen worden aangeduid als gematigde rebellen……. 

Het SOHR wordt geleid door een gewezen Syrische misdadiger die o.a. bekend staat als Osama Suleiman (tot voor kort was hij ook het enige personeelslid), die terechte gevangenisstraf in Syrië jammer
genoeg heeft weten te voorkomen door te vluchten en zich bij de
Britten te melden als ‘politiek vluchteling…’ Deze SOHR is er elke
keer als de kippen bij om een gifgasaanval aan Assad toe te
schrijven, zelfs als andere nieuwsmedia (wat SOHR niet is) nog bezig
zijn berichten te controleren (als deze reguliere media dat al
doen….), weet SOHR te melden dat het bij wijze van spreken Assad
zelf was……..

Het SOHR is dan ook niets anders dan een verlengstuk van een aantal terreurgroepen in Syrië….

Gezien
het verleden valt het me nog mee dat er niet al eerder een
gifgasaanval werd uitgevoerd (na Douma, maar nu echt met gifgas dat
deze terreurgroepen met toestemming van het westen in bezit mogen
houden…)……

Waarschijnlijk
was men te verbaasd dat de zogenaamde gifgasanval op Douma zo makkelijk als waar werd
geslikt door de een groot deel van de wereld……. De OPCW, een organisatie die nauw samenwerkt met de VN (een organisatie voor het verbod op kernwapens), heeft zonder opdracht onderzoek uitgevoerd in Doumaen vond net als eerdere deskundigen
geen sporen van gifgas, sporen die na een echte aanval zeker zouden zijn achtergebleven…… In het hoofdkwartier van de OPCW te Den Haag hebben getuigen van deze zogenaamde
gifgasaanval verklaringen afgegeven waarin wordt gesteld dat er geen sprake was van een
gifgasaanval in Douma…….

Kijk
‘die fout’ maken de terreurgroepen in Syrië niet nog een keer >>
de volgende keer zal er een groot aantal doden te betreuren zijn,
deze zogenaamde gematigde rebellen hebben schijt aan mensenlevens,
precies als de White Helmets, een steungroep van deze rebellen die de
handen zelf ook vuilmaken aan oorlogsmisdaden……. (het beest Trump heeft de White Helmets een subsidie van 6 miljoen dollar toegekend, zo werd vanmorgen bekend gemaakt……)

Russia
Warns of Impending Staged Chemical Attack in Syria

June
14, 2018 at 8:37 am

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE Op-ed) — As
the world’s attention was focused on Singapore and the historic
Trump-Kim summit this week, and with broad media acknowledgement
that 
Assad
has won the war for Syria
, the
time could be ripe for some kind of major event to jolt the globe’s
focus back to the war, now in its seventh year, which could be slowly
winding down.

It
seems to occur every time the Syrian Army is on a trajectory of
overwhelming victory: 
an
ill-timed and strategically nonsensical mass chemical attack on
civilians supposedly ordered by Assad
 —
inevitably giving the West an open door for military intervention,
new rounds of crippling sanctions, and yet more international media
condemnation heaped on Damascus.

And
this week the Russian Defense Ministry has warned of just such a
scenario. Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Igor Konashenkov
said early in the week that US-backed Free Syrian Army (FSA) forces
are planning 
a
“serious provocation” aimed at justifying a new round of Western
coalition missile attacks against Syrian government bases and
facilities.

Image
circulating in the aftermath the claimed chemical attack in Douma.
Image source: Baladi News Network, screenshot via Middle East Eye

Konashenkov,
in a statement carried by 
Russian
state-run TASS
 and
subsequently featured in a 
One
America News 
report
,
said “According to the information confirmed through three
independent channels in Syria, the command of the so-called ‘Free
Syrian Army’ aided by the forces of the US special ops units
are 
preparing
a serious provocation involving chemical warfare agents in the Deir
ez-Zor province.

The
TASS media release 
explained
further
:

According
to Konashenkov, 
FSA
militants have delivered chlorine cylinders to the Syrian Deir ez-Zor
province to simulate another “chemical attack against civilians.”

After
being published in western media 
a
staged video is set to initiate a missile strike on Syria’s state
facilities by the US-led coalition and justify an offensive operation
by militants against Syrian governmental forces on the eastern bank
of the Euphrates River,”
 he
said, adding that Russia’s Defense Ministry warns that the use of
such provocations for destabilization of the environment on the
Syrian territory is unacceptable.

Though
there’s currently no way to verify if such claims are true, and no
“staged video” has yet to surface on the internet, the Russian
Defense Ministry appears to be 
painting
a potential future scenario much like last April’s chemical attack
incident: it was 
video
of mass civilian death
 which
directly led to Western airstrikes on Syria. 

A
new One America News report features the Russian Defense Ministry
claims:

After
the 
Saudi-backed
jihadist group Jaish al-Islam
,
working in tandem with the US/UK sponsored White Helmets, claimed a
Syrian Army chemical attack against civilians in Douma on April 7,
the US-led coalition 
launched
over a hundred missiles
 on
government facilities primarily in and around Damascus. This was done
even as the UN and global chemical watchdog organization, the OPCW,
said there were no independent observers on the ground to confirm
whether or not a chemical attack even took place, much less who was
to blame.

Some
among the first group of journalists to gain entry inside Douma,
located just outside Damascus, such as the UK 
Independent’s Robert
Fisk and 
One
America News Network’s 
Pearson
Sharp,
 found
no evidence that a chemical attack took place in Douma
,
contrary to what was widely reported in international media. A formal
OPCW investigation 
is
still ongoing
.

Notably,
Russia as well as some 
mainstream
Western counter-terror experts
 have consistently
pointed the finger at Jaish
 al Islam (JAI)
for 
staging
the Douma “chemical attack”
 in
order to provoke the US military response.
 And
prior reporting emerged in the aftermath that 
JAI
itself had used chemical weapons against Kurdish militias
 in Aleppo’s
Sheikh Maqsoud district in 2016 (and it appears that the
Saudi-backed group 
openly
admitted to carrying out prior chemical attacks
 according
to 
The
Daily Beast
).

Russia
further hosted a press briefing at OPCW headquarters in The Hague
where
 witnesses
came forward to say there was no chemical attack
,
but that respiratory problems from conventional weapons bombarding
the town were made to look like chemical symptoms once Jaish al Islam
and the White Helmets took over a local hospital and began filming.

The
testimony was consistent with well-known Syrian opposition group
Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), 
which
initially reported based on its own pro-rebel sourcing
 that
heavy government bombardment of Douma city resulted in 
the
collapse of homes and underground shelters, causing civilians in
hiding to suffocate.

According
to 
SOHR,
which has long been a key go-to source for mainstream media over the
course of the war, 
70
of them [women and children] have suffered suffocation as a result of
the demolition of home basements over them due to the heavy and
intense shelling.”

Crucially,
all of this occurred just days after President Trump declared 
he
planned to order a complete US military pullout from Syria
.
And predictably, the April chemical provocation was 
just
the thing that brought Trump’s planned pullout to a grinding halt
,
with Secretary of Defense James Mattis 
telling
NATO leaders at the start of this week
 that
he remains against a US withdrawal “before progress was made” —
whatever that means.
Assad
is “here to stay”

Recently, the Washington Post issued
a surprising admission, reluctantly declaring that that 
 —The
writing is now indisputably on the wall: The Syrian
 regime
is going nowhere,”
 according
to widely circulated op-ed.

But
if recent history provides a pattern for the future, once the media
establishment and political leaders in the West begin acknowledging
“Assad is here to stay,” this portends that 
a
major regime change precipitating event is just around the corner.

Op-ed
by 
Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

=======================================



* Het westen was tegen een onderzoek door de OPCW, terwijl Rusland juist om een echt onafhankelijk onderzoek, zoals door de OPCW had gevraagd…….

Zie ook: ‘VS, GB en Frankrijk begaan enorme oorlogsmisdaad met aanval op Syrische doelen……

        en: ‘Aanval op Syrische doelen door VS, GB en Frankrijk op moment dat de beurs 2 dagen is gesloten….

        en:  ‘BBC verklaart oorlogscorrespondent Vanessa Beeley met haar berichtgeving over Syrië en de gifgasaanval op Douma als staatsgevaarlijk…………

        en: ‘De Hoop Scheffer (CDA en ex-NAVO chef) heeft geen spijt voor de steun aan de illegale Irakoorlog >> 1,5 miljoen vermoorde Irakezen verder……‘ (waar deze ploert zich ook uitspreekt over ‘de gifgasaanval’ op Douma)

        en: ‘Rusland voorspelde ‘de gifgasaanval’ in Oost-Ghouta en de reactie daarop van de VS…..

        en: ‘Rusland beschuldigd GB van het regisseren gifgasaanval Douma en zegt daar bewijzen voor te hebben

        en: ‘In Douma vond geen gifgasaanval plaats aldus gelauwerd journalist Robert Fisk…..

        en: ‘De OPCW inspecteurs en hun werk in Douma n.a.v. ‘gifgasaanval…’

        en: ‘Wapenfabrikanten die de illegale raketbeschietingen op Syrië mogelijk maakten, zagen hun aandelen met 10 miljard stijgen………

        en: ‘OPCW team in Douma stelt dat Syrië en Rusland niets hebben veranderd dan wel verwijderd op de plaats van de ‘gisfgasaanval’

        en: ‘The Guardian bracht anti-Russische propaganda i.v.m. ‘gifgasaanval’ Douma en weigert dit te rectificeren, of te verwijderen…….

        en: ‘The Guardian met propaganda over Syrië, die zo uit Orwells 1984 zou kunnen komen……

        en: ‘Syrian ‘Rebels’ Used Sarin Nerve Gas Sold By Britain

        en: ‘Gifgasaanval vooropgezet spel om VS actie te rechtvaardigen, waarbij GB de spelers opdracht gaf dit toneelspel snel uit te voeren…….. ‘False flag gelukt’: Syrië gebombardeerd zonder enig bewijs voor schuld…..

        en:Syrië: verslaggever Bartlett prikt leugens reguliere media door

        en: ‘Syrië, de prijs van westerse terreur (die onmiddellijk gestopt moet worden >> tijd voor actie!)……

        en: ‘Obama wist van bewapenen en ondersteunen terroristen in Syrië…….

OPCW team in Douma stelt dat Syrië en Rusland niets hebben veranderd dan wel verwijderd op de plaats van de ‘gisfgasaanval’

Na veel vertraging heeft de Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) afgelopen zaterdag monsters genomen in Douma op de plek waar een gifgasaanval zou hebben plaatsgevonden. De missie wordt geëvalueerd door de OPCW en het United Nations Department of Safety and Security (UNDSS), een VN organisatie die voor de veiligheid van het OPCW team zorgt, waarna men wellicht zal beslissen het onderzoek nog eens te herhalen.

Uitlatingen van westerse politici zoals de Franse opperhufter Macron en de reguliere westerse media, als zouden Syrië en Rusland het onderzoeksteam expres hebben vertraagd, werden tegengesproken, de vertraging had alles te maken met de inschatting van de veiligheid door het UNDSS team……..

Voorts zouden Rusland en Syrië ‘de plaats delict’ hebben gemanipuleerd en zaken hebben verwijderd dan wel verborgen, aldus dezelfde westerse politici en media. Dat heeft de OPCW intussen weersproken, ofwel ook dit was (alweer) valse anti-Syrische/Russische propaganda……..

Macron en de media spelen wel een heel smerig spel in deze, uitlatingen dat Rusland en Syrië de zaak zouden hebben vertraagd, was al een enorme leugen, daar de VN Veiligheidsraad met meerderheid van stemmen besloot tegen een onderzoek door de OPCW te stemmen!! (een onderzoek waar nu juist Rusland en Syrië op aan hadden gedrongen….) De OPCW besloot zelfstandig een onderzoek te starten en als dit orgaan deze beslissing niet had genomen, was er nog niets gebeurd……….. Zoals gezegd: Als je de reguliere media (plus het grootste deel van de westerse politici) moest geloven waren het Syrië en Rusland die tegen een onderzoek waren, dezelfde media en politici die zo’n grote bek hebben over ‘fake news’, maar zoals ook uit deze zaak blijkt, zelf de grote leveranciers zijn van ‘fake news’ (of ‘nepnieuws’)……..

Beste lezer het gaat nog veel verder: de Franse president Macron en de Britse premier May logen na de ‘gifgasaanval’ over onomstotelijke bewijzen te beschikken, maar gaven deze niet vrij. Dezelfde Macron beweert nu dat Rusland en Syrië de zaak hebben verdoezeld in Douma, echter wat maakt dat uit, als je toch onomstotelijk bewijs hebt dat het Syrische bewind de schuldige is???? (en dan nogmaals: van manipulaties op de plaats waar de aanval plaatsvond is niets gebleken, zo heeft de OPCW vastgesteld……)

Intussen hebben meerdere bronnen gemeld dat er in het geheel geen gifgasaanval heeft plaatsgevonden in Douma, iets dat de toenadering tussen de VS en Rusland kan verklaren, immers in de VS zal men intussen wel begrepen hebben dat de aanval van de VS, Frankrijk en GB op Syrische doelen na de zogenaamde gifgasaanval, nooit had mogen plaatsvinden, ofwel dat was de zoveelste enorme oorlogsmisdaad van de VS en een paar van haar NAVO partners, de NAVO dat in feite onder opperbevel van de VS staat………..

Hier een video waarin meerdere getuigen melden dat er geen gifgasaanval plaats heeft gevonden in Douma (zie ook het bericht onder de de link met de titel die begint met de woorden ‘In Douma vond geen gifgasaanval plaats enz…’, te vinden onder het hierna opgenomen artikel):

Trouwens ongelofelijk dat je vanuit de reguliere westerse media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici, nooit commentaar hoort op het feit dat de door hen zo geliefde ‘gematigde rebellen’ (psychopathische moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen) beschikken over gifgas, terwijl al lang bewezen is dat deze terreurgroepen daadwerkelijk gifgas hebben gebruikt, zoals bij de grote gifgasaanval in 2013, zo concludeerde zelfs een VN onderzoeksteam!! (nog steeds zegt men keihard in de westerse politiek en media dat deze aanval door het Assad bewind werd uitgevoerd…….)

Het volgende artikel van Tyler Durden werd gisteren gepubliceerd op Zero Hedge:

OPCW
Chemical Inspection Team Reaches Douma After Issuing Statement
Negating “Russia Cover-Up” Claim

by Tyler
Durden

Sun,
04/22/2018 – 10:52

After
many days of delay inside the security arch of Damascus’ city center,
the international chemical weapons watchdog group, Organisation
for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW), announced that its
team of investigators 
finally
entered the Damascus suburb town of Douma early on Saturday. 

In
an official statement posted to its website, the 
OPCW confirmed the
following: 

The
Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) team of the Organisation for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) visited one of the sites in
Douma, Syrian Arab Republic today 
to
collect samples for analysis in connection with allegations of
chemical weapons use on 7 April 2018.
 The
OPCW will evaluate the situation and consider future steps 
including
another possible visit to Douma
.

The
OPCW Fact-Finding Mission will initially study the collected samples
at an OPCW lab in the Netherlands, with potential sample distribution
to its other designated labs. In the past, it’s take up to multiple
weeks or months for the OPCW to issue a preliminary report to the
public.

Image
source: Hurriyet Daily News

The
statement 
continues

The
samples collected will be transported to the OPCW Laboratory in
Rijswijk and then dispatched for analysis to the OPCW’s designated
labs.
 Based
on the analysis of the sample results as well other information and
materials collected by the team, the FFM will compile their report
for submission to the States Parties to the Chemical Weapons
Convention for their consideration.

It
is unclear if any of what was collected includes tissue samples from
corpses as it’s now being widely reported that the jihadist group
which previously held the area – Jaish al-Islam – 
hastily
buried the bodies
 of
alleged chemical attack victims. 

Though
the team was invited into the country by the Syrian and Russian
governments – 
both
signatories
 to
the international body devoted to decommissioning global stockpiles
of banned chemical weapons – 
there’s
been much spin and obfuscation regarding why the team was actually
delayed, with a number of media outlets in the West falsely claiming
that Syria and Russia were 
attempting
a cover-up
. 

This
was based in part on the unverified claims of political leaders in
the West who have long sought Syrian President Bashar al-Assad’s
ouster, and who have given covert aid to various jihadist rebel
groups. 

France’s
foreign minister, for example, 
accused
both Damascus and Russia of
 “obstructionism
[which] is obviously undermining the caliber of the investigation. It
is most likely aimed at removing evidence and other material elements
linked to the chemical attack on the very site where it took place.”

However,
in spite of multiple international headlines, Western leaders, and
journalists who reside far outside of Syria 
claiming
a chemical cover-up conspiracy in the making
,
the OPCW in official statements 
confirmed
that they were prevented from visiting Douma not by Syrian or Russian
authorities, but by United Nations Department of Safety and
Security (UNDSS), which has the final say over OPCW movements within
Syria. 

On
Wednesday (April 18) the Director General of the OPCW Ahmet Üzümcü,
issued a
 statement which
proved the “Syria/Russia hiding evidence” theory false

On
16 April, we received confirmation from the National Authority of the
Syrian Arab Republic that, under agreements reached to allow the
evacuation of the population in Ghouta, the Syrian military were
unable to enter Douma. The security for the sites where the FFM plans
to deploy was under the control of the Russian Military Police. The
United Nations Department of Safety and Security (UNDSS) has made the
necessary arrangements with the Syrian authorities to escort the team
to a certain point and then for the escort to be taken over by the
Russian Military Police. 
However,
the UNDSS preferred to first conduct a reconnaissance visit to the
sites, which took place yesterday. FFM team members did not
participate in this visit.

On
arrival at Site 1, a large crowd gathered and the advice provided by
the UNDSS was that 
the
reconnaissance team should withdraw. At Site 2, the team came under
small arms fire and an explosive was detonated. The reconnaissance
team returned to Damascus.

Though
the OPCW statement further acknowledged the area to be a “highly
volatile environment” fraught with “security risks” –
a number of journalists actually made it into Douma early in the week
prior to the OPCW team’s arrival.

Some
among this early group of journalists which gained entry to the site,
such as the UK 
Independent’s Robert
Fisk and 
One
America News Network’s 
PearsonSharp found
no evidence that a chemical attack took place in Douma
,
contrary to what’s been widely reported in international media.

War
Conflict

========================

Zie ook: ‘VS, GB en Frankrijk begaan enorme oorlogsmisdaad met aanval op Syrische doelen……

        en: ‘Aanval op Syrische doelen door VS, GB en Frankrijk op moment dat de beurs 2 dagen is gesloten….

        en: ‘De Hoop Scheffer (CDA en ex-NAVO) heeft geen spijt voor de steun aan de illegale Irakoorlog >> 1,5 miljoen vermoorde Irakezen verder……

        en: ‘Russische volk wordt geadviseerd zich voor te bereiden op een nucleaire oorlog…….

        en: ‘Gifgasaanval vooropgezet spel om VS actie te rechtvaardigen, waarbij GB de spelers opdracht gaf dit toneelspel snel uit te voeren…….. ‘False flag gelukt’: Syrië gebombardeerd zonder enig bewijs voor schuld…..

        en: ‘Rusland voorspelde ‘de gifgasaanval’ in Oost-Ghouta en de reactie daarop van de VS…..

        en: ‘Rusland beschuldigd GB van het regisseren gifgasaanval Douma en zegt daar bewijzen voor te hebben

        en: ‘In Douma vond geen gifgasaanval plaats aldus gelauwerd journalist Robert Fisk…..

        en: ‘De OPCW inspecteurs en hun werk in Douma n.a.v. ‘gifgasaanval…’

        en:  ‘Wapenfabrikanten die de illegale raketbeschietingen op Syrië mogelijk maakten, zagen hun aandelen met 10 miljard stijgen………

        en: ‘VS en GB brengen propaganda die moet verdoezelen wat er echt gebeurt in Syrië…….. Door VS gebombardeerde ‘gifgasfabriek’ niet bestaand….

        en: ‘Syrië: verslaggever Bartlett prikt leugens reguliere media door

        en: ‘Syrië wacht andermaal een geplande gasaanval van ‘gematigde rebellen……..’

Zag na plaatsing dat ik in de kop per abuis tweemaal de naam Douma had opgenomen, mijn excuus.

In Douma vond geen gifgasaanval plaats aldus gelauwerd journalist Robert Fisk…..

Anti-Media
bracht gisteren een artikel van Tyler Durden dat eerder op Zero Hedge
werd pepubliceerd.

Uitgebreid
verteld Robert Fisk over zijn bevindingen in Douma. Fisk is één van
de weinigen die niet geloofde dat het winnende Syrische leger het
eigen volk zou aanvallen met gifgas….. Alweer als één van de
weinigen besloot Fisk zelf op onderzoek uit te gaan en hij vertrok
naar Douma. Terwijl de reguliere westerse (massa-) media en het
grootste deel van de westerse politici (plus zogenaamde deskundigen
en opiniemakers) keihard durven te zeggen dat het Syrische leger en
daarmee Assad schuldig is aan de ‘gifgasaanval’ en nee, daar heeft men geen bewijzen voor,
men lult elkaar en terreurgroep Jaysh al-Islam plus de White Helmets gewoon na………. (de White Helmets die al heel wat ‘fake news’ [nepnieuws] hebben verspreid, zoals bekend zou moeten zijn bij de westerse reguliere media en politiek……)

Sterker
nog: door de voornoemde woordvoerders van de media en andere figuren
wordt de grote gifgasaanval van augustus 2013 er keer op keer
bijgesleept als een oorlogsmisdaad van het reguliere Syrische leger, terwijl
uit en te na is aangetoond dat door het westen genoemde ‘gematigde
rebellen’ verantwoordelijk zijn voor (ook) die aanval…….(o.a. een
VN onderzoek toonde dit aan……)

Ook nu verlaat men zich op o.a. op de terreurgroep Jaysh al-Islam
(het leger van de islam, echt een naam voor een ‘gematigde rebellen
groep…..’ ha! ha! ha!) en de White Helmets voor de
getuigenverklaringen……. Dit ‘leger van de islam’ (betekenis van Jaysh al-Islam) heeft NB toegegeven dat
het eerder gifgas heeft gebruikt in Syrië…….. Onbegrijpelijk
trouwens dat het westen geen commentaar heeft op het feit dat meerdere ‘gematigde
rebellengroepen’ in het bezit zijn van gifgas…. Wat de White
Helmets betreft, die zijn al lang door de mand gevallen als hulp van
Al Qaida en nog een paar andere terreurgroepen, waaronder Jaysh al-Islam…….

De
conclusie die Fisk heeft getrokken, is dat er zelfs geen gifgasaanval
heeft plaatsgevonden in Douma……..

Lees
het relaas van Fisk en geeft het door, de hoogste tijd dat de muur
van leugens en ongebreidelde oorlogshitserij wordt doorbroken!!

They
Were Not Gassed”: Famed Reporter Reaches Syrian ‘Chemical Attack’
Site

April
17, 2018 at 9:16 am

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE) — Robert
Fisk’s bombshell first-hand account for the UK
 Independent runs
contrary to nearly every claim circulating in major international
press concerning what happened just over week ago on April 7th in an
embattled suburb outside Damascus: not only has the veteran British
journalist 
found no
evidence of a mass chemical attack, but he’s encountered multiple
local eyewitnesses who experienced the chaos of that night, but who
say the gas attack never happened.

Fisk
is
 the
first Western journalist to reach and report from the site of
the alleged chemical weapons attack
 widely
blamed on Assad’s forces.
 Writing
from Douma in eastern Ghouta, Robert Fisk has interviewed a Syrian
doctor who works at the hospital shown in one of the well-known
videos which purports to depict victims of a chemical attack.

The
Independent: “Middle East Correspondent Robert Fisk in one of the
miles of tunnels hacked beneath Douma by prisoners of Syrian rebels.”
(source: Yara Ismail via the Independent)

Importantly,
the report, published late in the day Monday, 
is
causing a stir
 among
mainstream journalists who
minutes
after the Saudi-sponsored jihadist group 
Jaish
al-Islam 
(Army
of Islam)
 accused
the Syrian Army of gassing civilians
began
uncritically promoting the “Assad gassed his own people”
narrative as an already cemented and “proven” fact based on the
mere word a notoriously brutal armed group who 
itself
has admitted to using chemical weapons on the Syrian battlefield
 in
prior years. 
Also
notable is that no journalist or international observer was anywhere
near Douma when the purported chemical attack took place. 

Controversy
ensued immediately after Fisk’s report, especially as 
he is
among the most recognizable names in the past four decades of Middle
East war reporting
,
having twice won the British Press Awards’ Journalist of the Year
prize and as seven time winner of the British Press Awards’ Foreign
Correspondent of the Year (the 
NY
Times 
has referred
to him as
“probably
the most famous foreign correspondent in Britain” while 
The
Guardian 
has
called him
 “one
of the most famous journalists in the world”). An Arabic speaker,
Fisk became famous for being among the few reporters in history to
conduct face-to-face interviews with Osama bin Laden, which he did on
three occasions between 1993 and 1997.

Fisk
says he was able to walk around and investigate newly liberated Douma
without Syrian government or Russian minders (in part this is likely
because he has reported from inside Syria 
going
back decades, in war-torn 1982 Hama, for example
),
and he 
begins
his account as follows
:

This
is the story of a town called Douma, a ravaged, stinking place of
smashed apartment blocks–and of an underground clinic whose images
of suffering allowed three of the Western world’s most powerful
nations to bomb Syria last week. There’s even a friendly doctor in
a green coat who, when I track him down in the very same
clinic, 
cheerfully
tells me that the “gas” videotape which horrified the world–
despite all the doubters–is perfectly genuine.

War
stories, however, have a habit of growing darker. 
For
the same 58-year old senior Syrian doctor then adds something
profoundly uncomfortable: the patients, he says, were overcome not by
gas but by oxygen starvation
 in
the rubbish-filled tunnels and basements in which they lived, on a
night of wind and heavy shelling that stirred up a dust storm.

Fisk
goes on to 
identify
the doctor by name – Dr. Assim Rahaibani – which is notable given
the fact that all early reporting from Douma typically relied on
“unnamed doctors” and anonymous opposition sources for early
claims of a chlorine gas attack
 (lately
morphed into an unverified “mixed” chlorine-and-sarin attack).

The
doctor’s testimony is consistent with that of the well-known Syrian
opposition group Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR)
which
initially reported based on its own pro-rebel sourcing
 that
heavy government bombardment of Douma city resulted in 
the
collapse of homes and underground shelters, causing civilians in
hiding to suffocate.

According
to 
SOHR,
which has long been a key go-to source for mainstream media over the
course of the war, 
70
of them [women and children] have suffered suffocation as a result of
the demolition of home basements over them due to the heavy and
intense shelling.”

Though
outlets from 
The
Guardian 
to The
Washington Post 
to The
New York Times
 have
quoted SOHR on a near daily basis throughout the past six years of
war, 
the
anti-Assad opposition outlet’s reporting of mass asphyxiation
due to collapse of shelters has been notably absent from the same
publications.

Fisk
details the Syrian doctor’s testimony, who is adamant in his
emphasis that civilians were suffocating en masse, 
and
were not gassed
:

It
was a short walk to Dr Rahaibani. From the door of his subterranean
clinic–“Point 200”, it is called, in the weird geology of this
partly-underground city–is a corridor leading downhill where he
showed me his lowly hospital and the few beds where a small girl was
crying as nurses treated a cut above her eye.

I
was with my family in the basement of my home three hundred metres
from here on the night but 
all
the doctors know what happened.
 There
was a lot of shelling [by government forces] and aircraft were always
over Douma at night–but on this night, there was wind and huge dust
clouds began to come into the basements and cellars where people
lived. 
People
began to arrive here suffering from hypoxia, oxygen loss. Then
someone at the door, a “White Helmet”, shouted “Gas!”, and a
panic began. People started throwing water over each other. Yes, the
video was filmed here, it is genuine, but what you see are people
suffering from hypoxia–not gas poisoning.”

In
addition to interviewing a doctor while standing in the very hospital
featured in White Helmets footage of the events, Fisk cites the
testimonies of multiple locals in the following:

Before
we go any further, readers should be aware that this is not the only
story in Douma. 
There
are the many people I talked to amid the ruins of the town who said
they had “never believed in” gas stories–which were usually put
about, they claimed, by the armed Islamist groups.
 

These
particular jihadis survived under a blizzard of shellfire by living
in other’s people’s homes and in 
vast,
wide tunnels with underground roads carved through the living rock by
prisoners with pick-axes on three levels beneath the town.
 I
walked through three of them yesterday, vast corridors of living rock
which still contained Russian–yes, Russian–rockets and burned-out
cars.

And
further fascinating is that the veteran British war correspondent
comes upon local Douma residents who have so long been trapped in an
isolated 
‘fog
of war’
 battlefield
environment, that they are not even aware of the international
importance that the town has played in the US coalition decision to
bomb Syria:

So
the story of Douma is thus not just a story of gas–or no gas, as
the case may be. It’s about thousands of people who did not opt for
evacuation from Douma on buses that left last week, 
alongside
the gunmen with whom they had to live
 like
troglodytes for months in order to survive.

I
walked across this town quite freely yesterday without soldier,
policeman or minder to haunt my footsteps, just two Syrian friends, a
camera and a notebook.
 I
sometimes had to clamber across 20-foot-high ramparts, up and down
almost sheer walls of earth. Happy to see foreigners among them,
happier still that the siege is finally over, they are mostly
smiling; those whose faces you can see, of course, because a
surprising number of Douma’s women wear full-length black hijab.

Oddly,
after chatting to more than 20 people, I couldn’t find one who
showed the slightest interest in Douma’s role in bringing about the
Western air attacks.
 Two
actually told me they didn’t know about the connection.

But
it was a strange world I walked into. Two men, Hussam and Nazir Abu
Aishe, said they were unaware how many people had been killed in
Douma, 
although
the latter admitted he had a cousin “executed by Jaish el-Islam
[the Army of Islam] for allegedly being “close to the regime”.
 They
shrugged when I asked about the 43 people said to have died in the
infamous Douma attack.

Bassem@BBassem7

The Evidence thriller

Evidence?
…A video montage of the Pentagon and State Department’s awkward
attempts to dodge the question of evidence*.

Concerning
the White Helmets, 
who
have played a dubious role throughout the war
 while
presenting themselves as “impartial” and “neutral” rescue
workers and film-makers, though known to operate 
exclusively in
al-Qaeda and other jihadist-controlled areas of Syria, 
Fisk
reports the following
:

The
White Helmets–the medical first responders already legendary in the
West but with some interesting corners to their own story–played a
familiar role during the battles. 
They
are partly funded by the [British] Foreign Office and most of the
local offices were staffed by Douma men.
 

I
found their wrecked offices not far from Dr Rahaibani’s clinic. A
gas mask had been left outside a food container with one eye-piece
pierced and a pile of dirty military camouflage uniforms lay inside
one room. Planted, I asked myself? I doubt it. The place was heaped
with capsules, broken medical equipment and files, bedding and
mattresses.

Of
course we must hear their side of the story, but it will not happen
here: 
a
woman told us that every member of the White Helmets in Douma
abandoned their main headquarters and chose to take the
government-organised and Russian-protected buses to the rebel
province of Idlib with the armed groups when the final truce was
agreed.

And
Fisk further narrates the strangeness of some of the reporting now
happening far outside of Douma which flatly contradicts the
testimonies of civilians still inside Douma that he encounters:

How
could it be that Douma refugees who had reached camps in Turkey were
already describing a gas attack which no-one in Douma today seemed to
recall?
 It
did occur to me, once I was walking for more than a mile through
these wretched prisoner-groined tunnels, that the citizens of Douma
lived so isolated from each other for so long that “news” in our
sense of the word simply had no meaning to them. 

Syria
doesn’t cut it as Jeffersonian democracy–as I cynically like to
tell my Arab colleagues–and it is indeed a ruthless dictatorship,
but that couldn’t cow these people, happy to see foreigners among
them, from reacting with a few words of truth.
 So
what were they telling me?

They
talked about the Islamists under whom they had lived. They talked
about how the armed groups had stolen civilian homes to avoid the
Syrian government and Russian bombing.
 The
Jaish el-Islam had burned their offices before they left, but the
massive buildings inside the security zones they created had almost
all been sandwiched to the ground by air strikes. A Syrian colonel I
came across behind one of these buildings asked if I wanted to see
how deep the tunnels were. I stopped after well over a mile when he
cryptically observed that “this tunnel might reach as far as
Britain”. Ah yes, Ms May, I remembered, whose air strikes had been
so intimately connected to this place of tunnels and dust. And gas?

For
a prime example of what Fisk references as refugees in Turkey
“already describing a gas attack which no-one in Douma seemed to
recall…” 
CNN
aired a segment from one such refugee camp which is absolutely
bizarre and stunning in its claims. 

During
the segment 
which
aired “hours after” the US-led airstrikes on Damascus
CNN’s
Arwa Damon

began
sniffing a 7-year-old Syrian girl’s backpack while concluding, “I
mean there’s definitely something that stings…”
 –
with the implication that empirical proof had been found of
government chemical weapons use against the little girl and her
family.

Walid@walid970721

This CNN report by Arwa Damon is an example of what Western governments and media consider evidence that the Syrian govt used chemical weapons in . In fact it proves nothing. CNN continues to shamelessly promote Jihadist propaganda & western military intervention

And
in the 
full
segment
,
Damon attempts to subtly introduce the idea of a nerve agent used
against the family (though initial claims were widely reported to be
chlorine) by awkwardly including the account of the girl’s escape
from Douma: 
She
could barely breath…
 she
felt as if 
her
entire nerves basically released
.” 

CNN

@CNN

This Syrian girl hid her dolls inside a box, telling them “you’re going to suffocate in here, maybe, but at least you might be safe from the bombings.” CNN reports from inside a refugee camp in Syria hours after a coordinated US-led airstrike hit the area. https://cnn.it/2H2pCLe 

Though
it’s unclear what the strange phrasing of “her entire nerves
basically released” actually means, 
CNN’s
Arwa Damon is ultimately claiming to be able to safely and
comfortably handle and sniff a backpack which contains residual sarin
and chlorine agents
,
while simultaneously presenting the backpack as “proof” of a
chemical attack which happened a week prior (to say nothing the
clearly unscientific and bogus nature all of the above).

Notably,
in addition to Fisk’s bombshell report filed from ground zero of
the claimed chemical attack in Douma, 
cable
network 
One
America News 
has
also issued a report from on the ground in the newly liberated town,
finding “no evidence” – in its words – that a chemical attack
took place there.

One America News

@OANN

OAN Investigation Finds No Evidence of Chemical Weapon Attack in Syria: http://youtu.be/lSXwG-901yU?a  via @YouTube


Robert
Fisk’s report for 
The
Independent
 and
the One America News segment 
constitute
the first major international media reports from the location of the
alleged chemical attack.
 But
it will be interesting to see the extent to which international
chemical and weapons experts either validate or refute their
conclusions once the site is inspected.

Meanwhile,
the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
(OPCW) Fact-Finding Mission (FFM) team 
arrived
in Damascus on Saturday, April 14th
 – after the
US-led overnight strikes which primarily hit government buildings in
the capital.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

================================

* Mijn excuus, aan het Twitterbericht (van Bassam) is ook een video verbonden, weet deze niet over te nemen, hier de link naar het originele artikel.

Zie ook: Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘VS bezig met voorbereiding van een ‘door Syrië’ gepleegde gifgasaanval, ofwel de volgende VS false flag operatie
        en: VS, GB en Frankrijk begaan enorme oorlogsmisdaad met aanval op Syrische doelen……

        en: ‘Aanval op Syrische doelen door VS, GB en Frankrijk op moment dat de beurs 2 dagen is gesloten….

        en: ‘Wapenfabrikanten die de illegale raketbeschietingen op Syrië mogelijk maakten, zagen hun aandelen met 10 miljard stijgen………

        en: ‘De Hoop Scheffer (CDA en ex-NAVO) heeft geen spijt voor de steun aan de illegale Irakoorlog >> 1,5 miljoen vermoorde Irakezen verder……

        en: ‘Russische volk wordt geadviseerd zich voor te bereiden op een nucleaire oorlog……


        en: ‘Gifgasaanval vooropgezet spel om VS actie te rechtvaardigen, waarbij GB de spelers opdracht gaf dit toneelspel snel uit te voeren…….. ‘False flag gelukt’: Syrië gebombardeerd zonder enig bewijs voor schuld…..

        en: ‘Rusland voorspelde ‘de gifgasaanval’ in Oost-Ghouta en de reactie daarop van de VS…..

        en: ‘Rusland beschuldigd GB van het regisseren gifgasaanval Douma en zegt daar bewijzen voor te hebben

        en: ‘De OPCW inspecteurs en hun werk in Douma n.a.v. ‘gifgasaanval…’

        en: ‘OPCW team in Douma stelt dat Syrië en Rusland niets hebben veranderd dan wel verwijderd op de plaats van de ‘gisfgasaanval’

        en: ‘The Guardian met propaganda over Syrië, die zo uit Orwells 1984 zou kunnen komen……

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en: ‘Syrian ‘Rebels’ Used Sarin Nerve Gas Sold By Britain

        en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

        en: ‘Syrië: verslaggever Bartlett prikt leugens reguliere media door

        en: ‘Syrië wacht andermaal een geplande gasaanval van ‘gematigde rebellen……..’

Douma: door leugens balanceert de wereld op de rand van vernietiging………….

De enorme anti-Syrische en Russische
propaganda n.a.v. de ‘gifgasaanval’ op Douma, is zonder meer hysterisch te noemen en is niets anders dan het
bespelen van de publieke opinie voor een volledige oorlog tegen het
democratisch gekozen Syrische bewind……… (je kan hier rustig van hersenspoelen spreken)

De schrijver van het volgende artikel
heeft de zaken nog eens op een duidelijke rij gezet en kan dan ook
niet anders dan tot de conclusie komen dat de VS en haar bondgenoten
uit zijn op een oorlog met Rusland, ofwel WOIII……. Let wel: een
oorlog die dan gevoerd zal worden op basis van leugens zoals dit het geval was met de illegale
oorlogen van de VS en NAVO tegen: Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en
uiteindelijk Syrië, waar de VS (gesteund door de rest van het westen) nu met leugens over een
gifgasaanval zegt een aanval te moeten openen tegen het Syrische bewind…..

Onder andere aandacht voor de ‘gifgasaanval’ op Khan Sheikhoun vorig jaar en de enorme leugens die later werden doorgeprikt…… Ondanks dat blijft men volhouden dat Syrië achter de aanval zat, hetzelfde geldt voor de gifgasaanval in 2013, deze werd in de schoenen van Assad geschoven, maar bewezen door de ‘gematigde rebellen’ uitgevoerd >> dagelijks hoor je de laatste dagen (sinds de ‘gifgasaanval’ op Douma) onder meer op de landelijke nieuws- en actualiteiten radiozenders Radio1, BNR, BBC World Service, Radio Nova Scotia en WDR de leugen herhaalt worden dat het reguliere Syrische leger verantwoordelijk was voor deze aanval……..

Voorts wordt nog eens aangegeven hoe blij de bewoners van door het Syrische leger bevrijdde gebieden zijn, blij van de vreselijke terreur af te zijn, waaronder zij moesten leven….. 

Chemical
Weapons Redux: Taking the World to the Brink of Annihilation

National security adviser John Bolton listens as President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White House, April 9, 2018, in Washington. (AP/Evan Vucci)

Years
of chemical weapons allegations, saber rattling and a desperate
search for a casus belli have culminated in a situation which risks a
serious conflict of world powers.

April
10th, 2018  
By Rick
Sterling

Western neoconservatives and hawks are driving the international situation to increase tension and danger. Not content with the destruction of Iraq and Libya based on false claims, they are now pressing for a direct U.S. attack on Syria


As
a dangerous prelude, Israeli jets flying over Lebanese airspace 
fired
missiles
 against
the T4/Tiyas Airbase west of Palmyra.    
 

This
was Predicted

As reported at Tass,
the Chief of Russia’s General Staff, Valery Gerasimov, predicted
the current events almost a month ago. The report from March 13 says:

Russia
has hard facts about preparations for staging the use of chemical
weapons against civilians by the government forces. After the
provocation, the U.S. plans to accuse Syria’s government forces of
using chemical weapons … furnish the so-called ‘evidence’ …
and Washington plans to deliver a missile and bomb strike against
Damascus’ government districts.”

Gerasimov
noted that Russian military advisors are staying in the Syrian
Defense Ministry’s facilities in Damascus and “in the event of a
threat to our military servicemen’s lives, Russia’s Armed Forces
will take retaliatory measures to target both the missiles and their
delivery vehicles.”

The
situation is clearly dangerous with risk of sliding into
international conflict and even WW3. If that happens, it would mean
the demise of civilization. All of this so that the West can continue
supporting the sectarian armed groups seeking to overthrow the Assad
government … in violation of international law and the UN Charter.

The
most powerful country in the world is now led by a real estate, hotel
and entertainment mogul without political experience. Behind the
scenes, there is a powerful foreign policy establishment determined
to maintain and reclaim U.S. unilateral “leadership” of the
world. They don’t like the fact that the U.S. is losing influence,
prestige and power around the world. Israel and Saudi Arabia are
especially upset that their plans for regional domination are
failing.

East
Ghouta, Damascus

East
Ghouta is a district of farms and towns on the north-east outskirts
of Damascus. For the past six years, various armed factions
controlled the area. On a nearly daily basis, they launched mortar
and hell cannon missile attacks into Damascus, killing many
thousands. This author personally witnessed two such mortar attacks
in April 2014.

By
the end of March, most of East Ghouta had been retaken by the
government. With the peaceful evacuation of armed militants,
civilians flooded into the humanitarian corridors and then government
camps for the displaced. The campaign was proceeding quickly with
minimal loss of life as the Russian Reconciliation officers
negotiated agreements which allowed the militants to keep small
weapons and be transported to Idlib in the north. Vanessa
Beeley 
documented the
situation including the happiness and relief of many civilians as
they finally made it to safety. One described the feeling as “like
being reborn”. Robert Fisk was on site and reported what he saw
firsthand in stories titled 
Watching
on as Islamist fighters are evacuated from war-torn Eastern
Ghouta
 and Western
howls of outrage over the Ghouta siege ring hollow
.

Watch
| Emotional Footage From East Ghouta Evacuation    

As
reported at 
the
Russian Reconciliation Centre
,
by the end of March, 105,857 civilians had moved into
government-controlled areas while 13,793 militants plus 23,433 family
members had been transported north. Those who wanted to stay,
including former fighters, were welcomed. They could rejoin Syrian
society with the same rights and obligations as other Syrians.

The
last remaining opposition stronghold was the town of Douma,
controlled by the Saudi funded Jaish al Islam. Negotiations were
prolonged because Jaish al Islam did not want to go to Idlib which is
dominated by another militant opposition group, Jabhat al Nusra also
known as Hayat Tahrir al-Sham.

The
Chemical Incident

On
Saturday, April 7 
video and
stories claiming a chemical weapons attack in Douma were broadcast.
The video showed dozens of dead children. On Sunday the story grabbed
western mainstream media headlines.  U.S. President Trump
quickly came to a 
conclusion, President
Putin, Russia and Iran are responsible for backing Animal Assad. Big
price to pay.”

Donald J. Trump


@realDonaldTrump

Many dead, including women and children, in mindless CHEMICAL attack in Syria. Area of atrocity is in lockdown and encircled by Syrian Army, making it completely inaccessible to outside world. President Putin, Russia and Iran are responsible for backing Animal Assad. Big price…

Twitter Ads info and privacy

There
has been no objective investigation. The media claims are based on
statements and videos from members of the Syrian American Medical
Society (SAMS) and White Helmets. Both organizations receive
significant funding from the U.S. government and call for Western
intervention in Syria.

Chemical
weapons have emerged as the quick and easy justification for
aggression.  One year ago, in April 2017, it was the incident at
Khan Shaykoun. That resulted in a U.S. attack on a Syrian air base
just days later. The subsequent 
investigation discovered
that dozens of victims had shown up in hospitals in diverse locations
and up to 100 kms away from the scene of crime BEFORE the event
happened. 

Strangely, and indicating the investigation team’s bias,
this red flag pointing to fraud was not investigated further. If it
was just a few victims or just one location, it might be a mistake in
time record-keeping. However, in this case, there were dozens of
discrepancies in multiple locations, clearly raising the possibility
of fraud.     

Now
we have the incident in Douma, a town on the outskirts of Damascus.
The armed opposition is in retreat. They have tried to pressure the
US and NATO to intervene directly since 2012. They have 
access
to chemical weapons
 in
East Ghouta and a motive. They also have thousands of prisoners. This
is the group which put hundreds of prisoners, primarily women, and
children, in 
cages on
the streets of Douma.

Who
Benefits?

The
timing of the chemical weapons incidents is also noteworthy. As
documented 
here,
one year ago on 30 March 2017 Ambassador Haley said the U.S. policy
was no longer focused on getting Assad out. Five days later the
chemical incident at Khan Sheikhoun happened, quickly followed by
blaming the Syrian government, a U.S. attack and a restoration of the
demand that “Assad must go”. On March 29 Trump 
said that
U.S. forces will withdraw from Syria “very soon”. This was
followed by outcries from the media and political establishment. Now,
following the Saturday chemical weapons incident, the U.S. is again
threatening to intervene directly. The chemical weapons incidents
have consistently resulted in the reversal of a proposed change in
hostility toward Syria.  

Neoconservatives
and the supporters of ‘regime change’ foreign policy have various
theories why the Assad government would perpetrate a chemical weapons
attack. Senator John McCain 
says the
Syrian President was “emboldened” by the previous Trump
statement.

Juan
Cole, an academic who promoted the assaults on Libya in 2011, has a
different theory. He 
says:,“Chemical
weapons are used by desperate regimes that are either outnumbered by
the enemy or are reluctant to take casualties in their militaries.
Barrel-bombing Douma with chem seems to have appealed to the regime
as a tactic for this reason. It had potential of frightening the
Douma population into deserting the Army of Islam.” In contrast
with his theory, chemical weapons were used extensively by the U.S.
in Vietnam and Iraq when they were far from desperate. As evidenced
in the flow of civilians into government-held areas, most of the
civilian population are happy to get away from the sectarian and
violent Army of Islam (“Jaish al Islam”). Cole seems to be basing
his theories on inaccurate western media coverage just as he did
regarding Libya where sensational claims about a looming massacre in
Benghazi were later 
shown to
be fraudulent.

It’s
clear who benefits from sensational media coverage about a chemical
weapons incident: those who seek to demonize the Syrian government
and President and want the U.S. government to intervene militarily.
Every time there is an incident, it is quickly accepted and used by
the governments and organizations who have been seeking ‘regime
change’ in Syria for many years.

Manipulating
Public Opinion

Nikki Haley, United States' Ambassador United Nations, shows pictures of Syrian victims of chemical attacks as she addresses a meeting of the Security Council on Syria at U.N. headquarters, April 5, 2017. (AP/Bebeto Matthews)

Nikki
Haley, United States’ Ambassador United Nations, shows pictures of
Syrian victims of alleged chemical weapons attacks as she addresses a
meeting of the Security Council on Syria at U.N. headquarters, April
5, 2017. (AP/Bebeto Matthews)

The
manipulation of western opinion about the Syrian conflict using fake
events is not theory; it has been proven.  A good example is
the 
fake
kidnapping
 of
NBC reporter Richard Engel in December 2012.  Engel and his
media team were reportedly kidnapped and threatened with death by
“Shabiha” supporters of the Syrian president. After days in
captivity, the American team was supposedly rescued by Free Syrian
Army “rebels” after a shootout. In 2015 it was confirmed this was
hoax perpetrated
by the FSA and their American supporters. The entire charade was
carried out by the “rebels”. The goal was to demonize the Assad
government and its supporters and to romanticize and increase support
for the armed opposition. Neither Engel nor NBC confessed to the
reality until it was about to be exposed years later, pointing to
duplicity and collusion in the deception.

Four
and half years ago, on 21 August 2013, the most famous chemical
weapons incident occurred. The Syrian government was immediately
accused of launching a sarin attack which killed hundreds of children
and civilians. Over the next six months, investigations were carried
out. The conclusions of 
Seymour
Hersh
Robert
Parry
 and
the research site 
whoghouta.com concluded
that the attack was almost certainly NOT from the government but
actually from one of the ‘rebel’ factions with support from
Turkish intelligence services. Two Turkish parliamentary deputies
held a press conference and publicly 
revealed some
of the evidence. The intent then, as now, was to provide
justification and provocation for the U.S. and NATO to intervene
directly.

An
Imminent Attack

Today
there is the imminent possibility of a major attack based on the
allegations of a clearly biased source. Whatever happened to
international law and legal due process? Why is violence being
threatened before there is a serious objective investigation of the
chemical incident? If the accusations against Syria are true, why not
have a serious investigation, especially now that the area has been
liberated today (9 April) and safe access can be provided?

The
drums of war are pounding. After over one year of incessant Russia
bashing and disinformation, is the public ready to go to 
war
with Russia
 over
Syria? Neoconservative hawks and their Israeli and Saudi allies seem
to want this. Their plans and predictions for Iraq, Libya and Yemen
were delusional fantasies with the price paid in blood by the people
of those countries and in treasure by Americans as well. Sadly, there
has not been any accountability for the media and political
establishment that promoted and launched these wars. Now they want to
escalate the aggression by attacking Syria, causing vastly more blood
to flow and risking a confrontation with a country which can fight
back.

Top
Photo | National security adviser John Bolton listens as
President Donald Trump speaks during a cabinet meeting at the White
House, April 9, 2018, in Washington. (AP/Evan Vucci)

Rick
Sterling
 is
an investigative journalist based in the San Francisco Bay Area. He
can be contacted at 
rsterling1@gmail.com

Read
more by 
Rick
Sterling

========================================

* De door de VS en een paar andere landen georganiseerde opstand in Syrië, al voorbereid vanaf 2006, moest tot een coup tegen Assad leiden, echter een oorlog was het gevolg…… Daarna stelden de VS en andere landen dat men wel moest vechten in Syrië vanwege de aanwezigheid van IS en andere terreurgroepen, die NB voor een groot deel werden aangevoerd door de VS en Saoedi-Arabië…. Met andere woorden: de VS en de NAVO vochten zogenaamd niet tegen het reguliere Syrische leger…… Nu wil de VS dan een volledige oorlogvoeren tegen het Syrische bewind en daarmee tegen Rusland en Iran……… Over de laatste gesproken, Iran: Israël is van zins om bij een vermoeden van agressie van Iran vanuit Syrië (tegen Israël), Syrië van de kaart te vegen, uiteraard een opmaat voor een aanval tegen Iran….. Later meer daarover.

Zie ook: ‘VS heeft drone aanval van terreurgroep Jabhat Fateh al-Sham op Russische doel in Syrië gecoördineerd…….‘ (zie ook de links onder dat bericht)