Tag: Republikeinse partij

About Republikeinse partij

Subscribe Feeds

Trumps grote held: Andrew Jackson, een genocidale voorstander van slavernij………

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Afgelopen zaterdag ontving ik een artikel van Harvey Wasserman. Hierin vertelt hij over het beest Trump en zijn uitlating dat zijn held, Andrew ‘Andy’ Jackson, de burgeroorlog in de VS had kunnen voorkomen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Jackson was een genocidale voorstander van slavernij, dezelfde slavernij die ten grondslag lag aan die burgeroorlog……… Jackson was democraat en onder zijn presidentschap is een enorm aantal oorspronkelijke bewoners van de VS vermoord, de zogenaamde indianen…….

Eerst als militair en later als president, heeft deze schoft een fikse steen bijgedragen aan de vreselijke en enorme genocide die de leiders van het gestolen land hebben uitgevoerd op de oorspronkelijke bewoners van dat ‘land’. Het gestolen ‘land’ dat wordt aangeduid als de Verenigde Staten van Amerika………

Het gaat hier overigens over een genocide, die een enorm aantal slachtoffers meer heeft gemaakt, dan de genocide van Hitler en zijn psychopathisch tuig op de joden………

Het maakt alweer het e.e.a. duidelijk over Trumps zieke geest….

Hier het artikel van Harvey Wasserman:

How
Trump’s Genocidal Hero Andrew Jackson Might Have “Avoided the
Civil War”

A portrait of former president Andrew Jackson hangs on the wall behind President Donald Trump, accompanied by Vice President Mike Pence, in the Oval Office at the White House in late March. (photo: Andrew Harnik/AP)

A
portrait of former president Andrew Jackson hangs on the wall behind
President Donald Trump, accompanied by Vice President Mike Pence, in
the Oval Office at the White House in late March. (photo: Andrew
Harnik/AP)

By
Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News

05
May 17


onald
Trump’s latest insane excursion into US history has been to claim
that his great hero, Andrew Jackson, might have prevented the Civil
War.

Given
his racist, genocidal nature, our seventh president could only have
done that by giving up slavery in the South, spreading it into the
North or giving the Southwest back to Mexico.

Jackson,
of course, would never have given up slavery, which was the cause of
the war and the core of his fortune.

As
a young man, like a cowboy driving cattle, Jackson personally drove
slaves to market. He eventually owned more than a hundred of them,
and defended America’s “peculiar institution” at every
opportunity.

In
addition to their authoritarian temperaments, Jackson and Trump share
“accomplishments” such as trashing the Constitution, personally
profiting from the presidency, and inciting imperial conquest.
Jackson did stand for the Union against South Carolina’s threatened
secession, but that was about tariffs, not slavery.

Trump
rightly says Jackson was “tough.” In 1806, in one of his fourteen
duels, Jackson took a bullet an inch from his heart. He then killed
his opponent in a manner considered most unchivalrous, and became a
social outcast for many years. The bullet stayed in his chest until
his own death four decades later.

Jackson
was also a pioneer homophobe. As Sen. James Buchanan of Pennsylvania
openly lived with his likely lover, Sen. Rufus King of South
Carolina, Jackson loudly referred to him as “Aunt Nancy.” (After
King died, Buchanan became our only “bachelor president.”)

But
mainstream historians have made a hero of “Old Hickory.” Born to
dirt poor Irish immigrants who died early, Jackson’s hardscrabble
upbringing was the opposite of Trump’s.

Trump
inherited millions from his father, who was a Klan (Kukluksklan, of KKK, AP) sympathizer (or
member), a landlord so cruel that the legendary leftie folksinger
Woody Guthrie wrote a song denouncing him.

Andrew
Jackson pre-dated the Klan, but would’ve killed for an estate like
the one Trump inherited. And he did.

As
an orphan, Jackson began his military career at age 13. Rising
through the ranks as an Indian killer, he conquered the Chickasaw by
recruiting their ancient rivals, the Cherokee. Jackson then turned on
the Cherokee as if they had been the enemy. His racism was open,
lethal, and proud.

With
Trump-style “Common Man” rhetoric, Jackson promised to destroy
the National Bank. He then made insider deals with the smaller banks
that replaced it, enriching his backers and himself. These and other
scams helped buy him his 1000-acre slave plantation in Tennessee.

When
he conquered native land for the US, Jackson and his cronies somehow
wound up with the best parcels. His 1830 Indian Removal Act ordered
all eastern tribes to move west of the Mississippi.

The
Appalachian Cherokee had an advanced tribal government, an elected
leader (John Ross), a capitol, a written constitution, and much more.
Most lived in private homes and ran successful farms. Some (like
Ross) owned plantations and slaves. There were seven Cherokee lumber
mills.

The
Cherokee petitioned for statehood. Supreme Court Chief Justice John
Marshall ruled that the Constitution allowed no new state to be
created from existing ones (Abraham Lincoln dodged that technicality
in 1863 to form West Virginia).

But
Marshall also ruled that the Cherokee had sovereignty (a clause later
used to site casinos) and a Constitutional right to stay on their
ancestral lands.

Jackson
replied, Trump-style, that he would ignore the Court. Under Jackson’s
successor, Martin Van Buren, federal troops forced some 14,000
Cherokee out of their homes at gunpoint. Through the summer of 1838
they were held in a concentration camp. Then, along the infamous
“Trail of Tears,” they were marched hundreds of miles to
Oklahoma. About 3,000 died along the way.

Jackson
promised the Cherokee and other tribes the right to live in that
Oklahoma territory “as long as the grass grows and the rivers
flow.” Fifty years later their “excess land” was given to white
“Sooners” who raced in on horseback and covered wagons to claim
homesteads.

As
for the Civil War, its root cause was conflict over Mexican land.
Mexico abolished slavery in its 1821 revolution against Spain. But
American settlers (many from Tennessee) re-established it in 1836,
when (after the Alamo) they made Texas an independent republic.

Jackson
died in 1845. The next year his protégé, James K. Polk, provoked a
war and took from Mexico what became New Mexico, Arizona, California,
Colorado, Nevada and more. US troops marched all the way into Mexico
City, where young soldiers like Robert E. Lee and Ulysses S. Grant
fought side-by-side. Americans like Abraham Lincoln and Henry Thoreau
denounced the conquest as a “poison pill.”

The
Civil War broke out when slave owners demanded the right to spread
slavery into the West. California’s 1850 statehood gave free states
a majority in Congress. War erupted in Kansas, where John Brown and
other abolitionists battled slave owners for control.

The
only way Jackson’s “art of the deal” might have avoided the
Civil War was by persuading northerners to embrace slavery, or
southerners to give it up. But both regions were committed to
expansion, and neither wanted the other’s economic system. When
Lincoln said the nation could not exist “half slave and half free,”
he was tragically correct.

Of
course, war might have been avoided if Jackson’s progeny had given
that land back to Mexico, or restored the Carolinas to the Cherokee,
or persuaded the southerners that slavery was never going to work in
the West anyway. Cotton does not grow in Kansas or the Southwest, and
slavery made no economic sense in the desert, corn or wheat fields.

Without
the Jacksonian conquest of Mexico, the “immigrants” Trump now
attacks would merely be living on their own land. The wall Trump
wants to build tracks a border that did not exist before Polk overran
what was once both our southern and our western neighbor.

Sorting
through his often insane pronouncements about US history, Trump has
seemed surprised to discover that Abraham Lincoln was actually his
fellow Republican, while Jackson was a Democrat. Each was the first
president from his respective party. Both were “men of the people.”
But their views on slavery were, literally, at war with each other.

Trump
might also note that when he retired from the presidency in 1837,
Jackson found a trusted relative had squandered his wealth. Much of
what he’d gouged out of slaughtering Indians and whipping slaves
was gone.

Since
Trump has joined Jackson in using the presidency to enrich himself,
he might want to oversee his sons more carefully.

He
might also try doing a better job with the economy. As Trump’s hero
left office in 1837, his immediate “legacy” featured a major
stock market panic followed by four years of depression.

No
doubt the Great Historian would loudly blame that on the Democrats …
until he realized his hero actually was one.


Harvey
Wasserman’s History
of the US is at www.solartopia.org,
along with Solartopia! Our Green-Powered Earth.

==================================

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u hieronder terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: John Brown, Chickasaw, A. Jackson en Lincoln.

Russische hack van DNC en Podesta’s e-mail: ‘het bewijs’ daarvoor zakt als een soufflé in elkaar

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Het was al lang duidelijk dat de bewering voor het Russische hacken van het DNC (Democratic National Committee) en het e-mail account van Podesta was gefundeerd op los zand en vooral was gebaseerd op de wil Rusland aan te wijzen als de grote boosdoener voor het verlies van de Democratische Partij in de VS presidentsverkiezingen, november vorig jaar.

Zeer tegen de zin van de VS, heeft Rusland zich internationaal (‘uiteraard’ niet in het westen) een positie verworven, die als betrouwbaar wordt gezien, dit i.t.t. de VS, als gevolg van VS inmenging in diverse buitenlanden en de grootscheepse terreur o.a. middels illegale oorlogen, die dit ‘land’ o.a. in het Midden-Oosten en Afrika begon.

Anti-Media bracht afgelopen zaterdag een artikel, waaruit duidelijk is op te maken, hoe de vork echt in de steel steekt, en dat (nogmaals: zoals bekend), Rusland niets met hacken of andere manipulaties van de verkiezingen te maken had!!

Het cyberbeveiligingsbedrijf dat de gegevens gaf voor de bewering dat het DNC en de mail van Podesta door de Russen zijn gehackt, Crowdstrike, heeft prutswerk geleverd en dat in één dag tijd..!!! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Crowdstrike heeft de zaak uitgelegd in de context van ‘de Russen hebben ‘t gedaan…..’ Lullig genoeg was juist de democratische presidentskandidaat Sanders, het slachtoffer van smerige manipulaties binnen de Democratische Partij, door de top van die partij!!

ESET, een ander cyberbeveiligingsbedrijf legt in het artikel uit wat Crowdstrike (expres) fout heeft gedaan. Het malware ‘programma’ X-Agent, dat volgens Crowdstrike werd gebruikt, is NB in handen gekomen van ESET, na onderzoek van TV5 Monde, de Bundestag en het DNC…….

Nogmaals, de conclusie van het volgende artikel is geen verrassing, de inhoud is dat echter wel degelijk!!

Oordeel zelf:

The
Evidence That Russia Hacked the DNC Is Collapsing

The Evidence That Russia Hacked the DNC Is Collapsing

(ANTIWAR Op-Ed) The
allegation – now accepted as incontrovertible fact by the
“mainstream” media – that the Russian intelligence services
hacked the Democratic National Committee (and John Podesta’s
emails) in an effort to help Donald Trump get elected recently
suffered a blow from which it may not recover.

Crowdstrike
is the cybersecurity company hired by the DNC to determine who hacked
their accounts: it took them a single day to determine the identity
of the culprits – it was, they
said,
two groups of hackers which they named “Fancy Bear” and “Cozy
Bear,” affiliated respectively with
the GRU, which is Russian military intelligence, and the FSB, the
Russian security service.

How
did they know this?

These
alleged “hacker groups” are not associated with any known
individuals in any way connected to Russian intelligence: instead,
they are identified by the tools they use, the times they do their
dirty work, the nature of the targets, and other characteristics
based on the history of past intrusions.

Yet
as Jeffrey Carr and other
cyberwarfare experts have
pointed out, this methodology is fatally flawed. “It’s important
to know that the process of attributing an attack by a cybersecurity
company has nothing to do with the scientific method,” writes
Carr:

“Claims
of attribution aren’t testable or repeatable because the hypothesis
is never proven right or wrong. Neither are claims of attribution
admissible in any criminal case, so those who make the claim don’t
have to abide by any rules of evidence (i.e., hearsay, relevance,
admissibility).”

Likening
attribution claims of hacking incidents by cybersecurity companies to
intelligence assessments, Carr notes that, unlike government agencies
such the CIA, these companies are never held to account for their
misses:

“When
it comes to cybersecurity estimates of attribution, no one holds the
company that makes the claim accountable because there’s no way to
prove whether the assignment of attribution is true or false unless
(1) there is a criminal conviction, (2) the hacker is caught in
the act, or (3) a government employee leaked the
evidence.”

This
lack of accountability may be changing, however, because
Crowdstrike’s case for attributing the hacking of the DNC to the
Russians is falling apart at the seams like a cheap sweater.

To
begin with, Crowdstrike initially gauged its certainty as to the
identity of the hackers with “medium
confidence.”
However, a later development, announced in late December and touted
by the Washington
Post,
boosted this to “high confidence.” The reason for this newfound
near-certainty was their discovery that “Fancy Bear” had also
infected an application used by the Ukrainian military to target
separatist artillery in the Ukrainian civil war. As
the Post reported:

“While
CrowdStrike, which was hired by the DNC to investigate the intrusions
and whose findings are described in a new report, had always
suspected that one of the two hacker groups that struck the DNC was
the GRU*, Russia’s military intelligence agency, it had only medium
confidence.

“Now,
said CrowdStrike co-founder Dmitri Alperovitch, ‘we have high
confidence’ it was a unit of the GRU. CrowdStrike had dubbed that
unit ‘Fancy Bear.’”

Crowdstrike published an
analysis that claimed a malware program supposedly unique to Fancy
Bear, X-Agent, had infected a Ukrainian targeting application and,
using GPS to geo-locate Ukrainian positions, had turned the
application against the Ukrainians, resulting in huge losses:

“Between
July and August 2014, Russian-backed forces launched some of the
most-decisive attacks against Ukrainian forces, resulting in
significant loss of life, weaponry and territory.

“Ukrainian
artillery forces have lost over 50% of their weapons in the two years
of conflict and over 80% of D-30 howitzers, the highest percentage of
loss of any other artillery pieces in Ukraine’s arsenal.”

Alperovitch told the
PBS News Hour that “Ukraine’s artillery men were targeted by the
same hackers, that we call Fancy Bear, that targeted DNC, but this
time they were targeting cell phones to try to understand their
location so that the Russian artillery forces can actually target
them in the open battle. It was the same variant of the same
malicious code that we had seen at the DNC.”

He told NBC
News that this proved the DNC hacker “wasn’t a 400-pound guy in
his bed,” as
Trump had opined during
the first presidential debate – it was the Russians.

The
only problem with this analysis is that is isn’t true. It turns out
that Crowdstrike’s estimate of Ukrainian losses was based on a blog
post by
a pro-Russian blogger eager to tout Ukrainian losses: the
Ukrainians denied it.
Furthermore, the hacking attribution was based on the hackers’ use
of a malware program called X-Agent, supposedly unique to Fancy Bear.
Since the target was the Ukrainian military, Crowdstrike extrapolated
from this that the hackers were working for the Russians.

All
somewhat plausible, except for two things: To begin with, as Jeffrey
Carr pointed
out in
December, and now others are beginning to realize, X-Agent isn’t
unique to Fancy Bear.

Citing
the findings of ESET, another cybersecurity company, he wrote:

“Unlike
Crowdstrike, ESET doesn’t assign APT28/Fancy Bear/Sednit to a
Russian Intelligence Service or anyone else for a very simple reason.
Once malware is deployed, it is no longer under the control of the
hacker who deployed it or the developer who created it. It can be
reverse-engineered, copied, modified, shared and redeployed again and
again by anyone. In other words  –  malware deployed is malware
enjoyed!

“In
fact, the source code for X-Agent, which was used in the DNC,
Bundestag, and TV5Monde attacks, was obtained by ESET as
part of their investigation!

“During
our investigations, we were able to retrieve the complete Xagent
source code for the Linux operating system….”

“If
ESET could do it, so can others. It is both foolish and baseless to
claim, as Crowdstrike does, that X-Agent is used solely by the
Russian government when the source code is there for anyone to find
and use at will.”

Secondly,
the estimate Crowdstrike used to verify the Ukrainian losses was
supposedly based on data from the respected International Institute
for Strategic Studies (IISS). But now IISS is disavowing
and debunking
their claims:

“[T]he International
Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS)
told [Voice of America] that CrowdStrike erroneously used IISS data
as proof of the intrusion. IISS disavowed any connection to the
CrowdStrike report. Ukraine’s Ministry of Defense also has claimed
combat losses and hacking never happened….

“’The
CrowdStrike report uses our data, but the inferences and analysis
drawn from that data belong solely to the report’s authors,” the
IISS said. “The inference they make that reductions in Ukrainian
D-30 artillery holdings between 2013 and 2016 were primarily the
result of combat losses is not a conclusion that we have ever
suggested ourselves, nor one we believe to be accurate.’

“

One
of the IISS researchers who produced the data said that while the
think tank had dramatically lowered its estimates of Ukrainian
artillery assets and howitzers in 2013, it did so as part of a
‘reassessment” and reallocation of units to airborne forces.’

“

’No,
we have never attributed this reduction to combat losses,” the IISS
researcher said, explaining that most of the reallocation occurred
prior to the two-year period that CrowdStrike cites in its report.

“

’The
vast majority of the reduction actually occurs … before
Crimea/Donbass,’ he added, referring to the 2014 Russian invasion
of Ukraine.”

The
definitive “evidence” cited by Alperovitch is now effectively
debunked: indeed, it was debunked by Carr late last year, but that
was ignored in the media’s rush to “prove” the Russians hacked
the DNC in order to further Trump’s presidential ambitions. The
exposure by the Voice of America of Crowdstrike’s falsification of
Ukrainian battlefield losses – the supposedly solid “proof” of
attributing the hack to the GRU – is the final nail in
Crowdstrike’s coffin. They didn’t bother to verify their analysis
of IISS’s data with IISS – they simply took as gospel the
allegations of a pro-Russian blogger. They didn’t contact the
Ukrainian military, either: instead, their confirmation bias dictated
that they shaped the “facts” to fit their predetermined
conclusion.

Now
why do you suppose that is? Why were they married so early – after
a single day – to the conclusion that it was the Russians who were
behind the hacking of the DNC?

Crowdstrike
founder Alperovitch is a Nonresident
Senior Fellow of
the Atlantic Council, and head honcho of its “Cyber Statecraft
Initiative” – of which his role in promoting the “Putin did it”
scenario is a Exhibit A. James Carden, writing in The
Nation,
makes the trenchant point that “The connection between Alperovitch
and the Atlantic Council has gone largely unremarked upon, but it is
relevant given that the Atlantic Council – which is
funded in part by
the US State Department, NATO, the governments of Latvia and
Lithuania, the Ukrainian World Congress, and the Ukrainian oligarch
Victor Pinchuk – has been among the loudest voices calling for a
new Cold War with Russia.” Adam Johnson, writing on
the FAIR blog, adds to our knowledge by noting that the Council’s
budget is also supplemented by “a consortium of Western
corporations (Qualcomm, Coca-Cola, The Blackstone Group), including
weapons manufacturers (Lockheed Martin, Raytheon, Northrop Grumman)
and oil companies (ExxonMobil, Shell, Chevron, BP).”

Johnson
also notes that CrowdStrike currently has a $150,000
/ year, no-bid contract with
the FBI for “systems analysis.”

Nice
work if you can get it.

This
last little tidbit gives us some insight into what is perhaps the
most curious aspect of the Russian-hackers-campaign-for-Trump story:
the FBI’s complete dependence on

Crowdstrike’s
analysis. Amazingly, the FBI did no independent forensic work on the
DNC servers before Crowdstrike got its hot little hands on them:
indeed, the
DNC denied the FBI access to the servers,
and, as far as anyone knows, the FBI never
examined them.
BuzzFeed quotes an
anonymous “intelligence official” as saying “Crowdstrike is
pretty good. There’s no reason to believe that anything they have
concluded is not accurate.”

There
is now.

Alperovitch
is scheduled
to testify before
the House Intelligence Committee, and one wonders if our clueless –
and technically challenged – Republican members of Congress will
question him about the debunking of Crowdstrike’s rush to judgment.
I tend to doubt it, since the Russia-did-it meme is now the Accepted
Narrative and no dissent is permitted – to challenge it would make
them “Putin apologists”! (Although maybe Trey Gowdy, the only
GOPer on that panel who seems to have any brains, may surprise me.)

As I’ve been saying for months,
there is no
evidence that
the Russians hacked the DNC: none, zilch, nada.
Yet this false narrative is the entire basis of a campaign launched
by the Democrats, hailed by the Trump-hating media, and fully
endorsed by the FBI and the CIA, the purpose of which is to “prove”
that Trump is “Putin’s puppet,” as Hillary Clinton put
it.
Now the investigative powers of the federal government are being
deployed to confirm that the Trump campaign “colluded” with the
Kremlin in an act the evidence for which is collapsing.

This
whole affair is a vicious fraud. If there is any justice in this
world – and there may not be – the perpetrators should be
charged, tried, and jailed.

Opinion
by Justin
Raimondo /
Republished with permission / AntiWar.com / Report
a typo

=======================

* GRU in Nederland GROe (label veranderd op 5 oktober 2018)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Alperovitch, Crowdstrike, Gowdy, GRU, IISS en Pinchuk.

VS verandert met tempo in fascistische politiestaat………….

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Staten in de VS waar de republikeinen het voor het zeggen hebben, voeren met grote snelheid nieuwe wetgeving in, waarmee protesteren tot het verleden moet gaan behoren. Zo deinst men er niet voor terug om mensen die protesteren op een snelweg, vogelvrij te verklaren voor de politie en voor de automobilisten op die weg……

De VS begint akelige gelijkenissen te vertonen met nazi-Duitsland, nu nog concentratiekampen voor ‘illegalen’, moslims en andersdenkenden en klaar zijn het psychopathische beest Trump en de top van het bedrijfsleven (dat godbetert mag regeren in Washington….)…..

Lees het volgende artikel van Sarah Cronin (onder dat artikel kan u klikken voor een ‘Dutch’ vertaling):

As
Trump Takes Power, Politicians Around the US Move to Make Protesting
Illegal



By
Sarah Cronin


January
22, 2017 “Information
Clearing House”
– “Antimedia”–  Indiana
passed a bill on
Wednesday that authorizes police officers to shut down highway
protesting “by any means necessary.” S.B.
285, as it is known, obliges a public official to dispatch all
available officers within 15 minutes of discovering any assembly of
10 or more people who are obstructing vehicle traffic.


The
bill then authorizes the responding officers to clear roads “by any
means necessary.”

Critics
are calling
it the “Block Traffic and You Die” bill, an apt name for
a bill that has co-opted the phrase “any means necessary,” used
famously in speech delivered
by Malcolm X during the Civil Rights movement, turning it into a
threat against government dissent (with no apparent awareness of the
irony).

S.B.
285 is among a collection of increasingly hostile ‘anti-obstruction’
laws that have been quietly submitted in states around the nation
over the past few months. A report by The
Intercept published Wednesday
tracked five such anti-protest laws introduced by Republican
lawmakers in different states, four of which are currently pending.

One
of the most disturbing among them is House
Bill N. 1203, a bill introduced earlier this month by North
Dakota lawmaker Keith Kempenich in
response to the Dakota Access Pipeline Protests (DAPL). The bill
would exempt motorists who hit demonstrators with their cars from any
liability in cases where the victims were “obstructing
vehicular traffic on a public road, street, or highway.”
This twisted take on protest criminalization comes short of condoning
manslaughter as a viable means of crowd control.

Also
this month, Minnesota State Representative Kathy Lohmer led the
effort on submitting H.F.
322, a bill that would re-classify obstructing highway traffic
from a misdemeanor to a “gross misdemeanor” and would authorize
government units to sue protesters for “public
safety response costs related to unlawful assemblies.”

The
proposed legislation is strikingly reminiscent of Washington State
Senator Eric Ericksen’s proposal to punish protesters as ‘economic
terrorists,’ which Anti-Media first reported
on in November.

All
of the proposed laws share a common trait in that they were all
adopted in response to a major protest event in that state. H.F. 322
was submitted shortly after a judge
dismissed the riot charges against protesters who took to
the St. Paul Interstate last July in a demonstration against the
police shooting of Philando
Castille. Ericksen’s “economic terrorism” bill announcement
came just days after anti-frackingprotesters blocked
railroad tracks in Olympia, Washington. DAPL protests inspired both
the Indiana and North Dakota bills.

These
retroactive responses on behalf of Republican state lawmakers are
also seen as preemptive strikes against the threat of increased
protests during the Trump presidency.

As
ACLU staff attorney Lee Rowland expressed in an
interview with The
Intercept,
these so-called ‘obstruction bills’ are but thinly disguised
efforts to squash any government dissent.

“A
law that would allow the state to charge a protester $10,000 for
stepping in the wrong place, or encourage a driver to get away with
manslaughter because the victim was protesting, is about one thing:
chilling protest,” Rowland
said.

Growing
tension between government officials and protesters is expected to
come to a culmination on Inauguration Day in D.C., where there will
already be many barriers in place to limit demonstrations.

First
and foremost is the Federal Grounds and Buildings Improvement Act of
2011, known as H.R
347.

H.R.-347
is a revision of a 1971 federal trespassing law that made it a crime
to “willfully and knowingly” remain in an area under Secret
Security protection. H.R. 347 removes the word “willingly,” a
legal technicality that effectively lowers the bar on the mental
state required to be found guilty under the law.

As
explained by the American
Civil Liberties Union:

“Under
the original language of the law, you had to act ‘willfully and
knowingly’ when committing the crime. In short, you had to know
your conduct was illegal. Under H.R. 347, you will simply need to act
‘knowingly,’ which here would mean that you know you’re in a
restricted area, but not necessarily that you’re committing a
crime.”

Under
current federal law, protesting in proximity to an elected official
under the protection of the Secret Service, which includes President
Trump, is a crime punishable by fine and up to ten years in jail.


Protesting
during Trump’s inauguration comes with additional complications as
the National Park Service reserves
a large portion of the inaugural parade route along
Pennsylvania Ave and in Freedom Plaza for ticket sales under the
exclusive discretion of Trump’s Presidential
Inaugural Committee (PIC). This means the PIC can refuse to
allow protesters along the route.

An
activist group called Act Now to Stop War and End Racism (Answer) has
been engaged in a  legal
battle with the National Park Service since 2005, arguing
the privatization of the Inauguration is an attempt to “sanitize”
the streets of dissent.

While
the National Park Service has been controversially setting aside
tickets for the PIC since
1980, the issue garnered more attention this year when it was
discovered that the sidewalk in front of the Trump International
Hotel, a significant site for protesters, would be a part of PIC’s
ticket-only area.

Adding
another level of bureaucracy, the Washington
Post reported the
hotel and plaza in front are actually under the control of Trump’s
real estate agency, meaning protesters would have to literally ‘ask
permission’ to remain in the space.

As
the week comes to an end, it becomes apparent that dissent is being
criminalized not only nationwide but on multiple fronts. Increased
regulations are appearing that limit the public spaces that can be
lawfully occupied in protest. Meanwhile, legislation is also being
introduced to increase the negative consequences for newly unlawful
protests. Should more states follow suit with Indiana, demonstrators
will soon find themselves paradoxically protesting for their right to
protest at all.

Click
for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.

Zie ook: ‘VS bedrijfsregering erger dan een bananenrepubliek, met dank aan Obama‘

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Cronin en Washington State.

Leon de Winter, een brallende fascist welkom in Buitenhof………..

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Weer een staaltje ‘niet te geloven’ afgelopen zondag op Buitenhof, de brallende fascist en zionist (contaminatie?) de Winter was uitgenodigd door AVROTROS, VARA en VPRO om zijn ‘uiterst belangwekkende’ mening te geven over Trump…….

Geen probleem voor deze publieke omroepen, dat deze hufter vindt dat aan het drinkwater van de Palestijnen een voorbehoedsmiddel moet worden toegevoegd, zodat deze mensen zich niet kunnen voortplanten……… Een uitlating die eerder werd gebezigd door leiders en volgelingen van een ideologie die dood en verderf over Europa bracht en waarvan de leiders joden, Roma, Sinti, homo’s en linkse intellectuelen uitmoordden >> de nazi ideologie. Men heeft ook toentertijd het plan opgevat de voortplanting van joden e.a. te stoppen en dit plan in tests ook daadwerkelijk uitgevoerd…….. De methode bleek destijds te duur en te ingewikkeld om uit te voeren…….

Uiteraard is de Winter wel te spreken over Trump, tja ons kent ons als fascistische pleitbezorgers………

De Winter is echt een intellect, hij stelde dat Trump straks vanzelf zal worden afgestraft, Dit vanwege het aanstellen van bankiers in zijn regering, bankiers die hij zo verfoeide in z’n verkiezingscampagne….. Over twee jaar vinden de senaatsverkiezingen plaats in de VS en men zal dan niet weer op de republikeinen stemmen, aldus de bolle wijsneus.

Totaal belachelijk, daar nu juist veel mensen hebben gestemd, die anders nooit stemden, maar zich lieten belazeren door de leugens van Trump. Die mensen gaan niet weer stemmen. Terwijl de achterban van de republikeinse partij, die voor Trump hebben gestemd, over 2 jaar weer republikeins zullen stemmen, overigens behoeven zij dan niet eens te stemmen op Trump……..

Daarover gesproken: mocht er tegen die tijd al fiks wat ontevredenheid zijn ontstaan rond zijn beleid, is het niet ondenkbaar dat Trump dit zal wijten aan het feit dat hij te weinig medestanders heeft in de senaat. Zo kan hij alsnog een keer de stemmen krijgen van mensen, die normaal nooit stemmen, maar dat dit jaar wel hebben gedaan tijdens de presidentsverkiezingen…….

De Winter stelt aan de hand van de situatie in de VS ‘dat we naar iets heel moois op weg zijn………’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, maakt niet uit wat, de Winter zou het al heel mooie vinden, als Israël de Palestijnen voorgoed weg bombardeert………… Wat een vuile griezel, gadver!!! Republikinds zullen we maar denken……

Oh ja, wat de Winter zou gebruiken als kerstgroet,zo vroeg presentator Hagens snaaks aan de Winter, houdt u vast: “Zalig kerstfeest……” ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, een knalrode kerst door vergoten Palestijnenbloed, ofwel een bloedrood zalig kerstfeest………

Presentator Hagens was duidelijk ingenomen met het optreden van de brallende fascist de Winter en naast gegrinnik van zijn kant, viel er dan ook geen echt kritische vraag te horen…… Ongelofelijk…….

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Steve King (VS Congres): openlijk racistisch, zonder enige consequentie…….

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

De republikeinse psychopaat Steve King, uit het Congres, durfde onlangs openlijk racistische taal te uiten tijdens een White Supremacy (fascisten) bijeenkomst te zeggen, dat de gekleurden niets hebben bijgedragen aan de ‘geciviliseerde samenleving……’ Met ‘geciviliseerd’, bedoelt hij uiteraard vooral de VS….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Goed plan, de VS civiliseren!!

Buiten dat de gekleurden de VS zo ongeveer hebben opgebouwd, is er een groot aantal gekleurden dat grote bijdragen heeft geleverd op gebied van wetenschap, politiek, literatuur, kunst en vooral niet te vergeten muziek!! Er zijn veel meer zaken te bedenken, waar de gekleurden in alleen al de VS grote prestaties hebben neergezet!!

Het is dus nu al zover, dat een ‘toppoliticus’ dit soort praatjes mag houden in het openbaar, zonder enige consequentie……. Dit in een land, waar vorig jaar 998 gekleurde mensen door de politie werden doodgeschoten en het eerste halfjaar van 2016, geeft weer een stijging van 6% op dezelfde periode van 2015 te zien…….

De VS, het land van hoop en glorie? Zeg maar: ‘stront en smurrie!’

De bron voor mijn bericht is een Care2 petitie, die wij als niet-VS burgers niet kunnen tekenen. Een petitie waarmee een openlijk excuus wordt geëist van opperschoft King voor zijn racistische uitlating.

Hier de tekst van de petitie:

Iowa
Congressman Steve King preached literal White Supremacy last night on
an MSNBC panel. 

He
was there to discuss the racial makeup of the Republican Party and he
said the following about what he called “subgroups” (A.K.A.
non-Western European descent folks):

“I’d
ask you to go back through history and figure out where are these
contributions that have been made by these other categories of people
that you are talking about? Where did any other subgroup of people
contribute more to civilization?”

While
his racist view is not terribly surprising, it is wildly offensive
and we demand he publicly apologize.

His
comment shows a historical, cultural and sociological ignorance at
best and deep-seated proud racism at worst. 

There
is no way to spin this comment that doesn’t say “I’m a white
guy who legitimately believes white people are better than everyone
else”. And he isn’t ashamed of that viewpoint, which ultimately
betrays the fact that the RNC is a safe space for vitriolic and
rampant racism.

It’s
astounding that he could say this in a country that was literally
built on the backs of slaves of African descent.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels S. King en White Supremacy,  .

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 8 wijze lessen!

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Het volgende artikel vond ik op de internetpagina van Care2. Dit artikel werd geplaatst i.h.k.v. MLK Day, ofwel Martin Luther King Day, die ieder jaar op 18 januari wordt gevierd in de VS. Acht lessen die nog even actueel zijn, als op het moment, dat Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. (15 januari 1929 – 4 april 1968) ze naar buiten bracht:

Beyond
Race: 8 Other Important Lessons from Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

By: Kevin
Mathews

  • January
    17, 2016

Editor’s
note: This post is a Care2 Favorite. It was originally published on
January 21, 2013. Enjoy. 

Dr.
Martin Luther King Jr. will always be remembered for his leadership
in the crusade for racial equality. And while that plight alone
would be worthy of several holidays, the truth is that Dr. King’s
calls for justice went well beyond skin color. Those who use MLK Day
merely as an opportunity to pat themselves on the back for the
racial progress this country has made are missing the larger
picture. Yes, we have an African American president, but King’s
work is still far from done. To honor King’s legacy today, let’s
reflect on some of the less-remembered lessons he shared:

1. Realize
That Laws Don’t Always Equal Justice

Time
and time again, King saw how a country’s laws could be flat out
wrong. He urged others to question the justice in laws and not
blindly adhere to them just because the powers that be say it is so.
“One has not only a legal but a moral responsibility to obey just
laws. Conversely, one has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust
laws. I would agree with St. Augustine that ‘an unjust law is no
law at all,’” King said in “Letter
from a Birmingham Jail”.

2. Question
Capitalism

King
spent a lot of time pondering the economic system. He acknowledged
that there are no easy answers in his speech “Where
Do We Go from Here?”:
“Communism forgets that life is individual. Capitalism forgets
that life is social. And the kingdom of brotherhood is found [in]
neither… but in a higher synthesis.” In a
letter to his soon-to-be-wife, Coretta Scott,
he wrote, “I am not so opposed to capitalism that I have failed to
see its relative merits. It started out with a noble and high
motive… but like most human system it [fell] victim to the very
thing it was revolting against. So today capitalism has outlived its
usefulness. It has brought a system that takes necessities from the
masses to give luxuries to the classes.” With wealth disparity
only compounding today, it is still relevant to question capitalism
and keeping searching for better solutions.

3. Do
Not Affiliate with a Political Party

It’s
not fair to say that King disengaged from the political process –
he was an avid voter and worked alongside various political leaders
when they helped further the pursuit of equality. However,
King declined
to give his allegiance to either the Democrats or Republicans.
“I feel that someone must remain in the position of nonalignment,
so that he can look objectively at both parties and be the conscience
of both – not the servant or master of either,” he said. Seeing
the faults of both sides, King chose to work both inside and outside
of the political system to accomplish progress rather than settling
for the lesser of two evils.

4. Vocally
Oppose War

Before
reading King’s speech “Remaining
Awake through a Great Revolution,”
I wouldn’t have guessed that the term “military-industrial
complex” existed all the way back in 1968. But even during the
Vietnam War era, people were well aware of the corporate profiteering
was a main motivation in waging war. King pointed out that the U.S.
military spent half a million dollars for every Vietnam solider it
killed, while only spending $53 on each American living in poverty
annually. In addition to pointing out these faulty priorities (which
continue today), he warned that playing with nuclear warfare would
lead to mutual destruction: “It is no longer a choice, my friends,
between violence and nonviolence. It is either nonviolence or
nonexistence.”

5. Support
Unions


Much
as unions are still vilified today, the labor movement has always
been under attack. In
a 1961 speech,
King supported the collective power of workers, saying, “History is
a great teacher. Now everyone knows that the labor movement did not
diminish the strength of the nation but enlarged it. By raising the
standards of millions, labor miraculously created a market for
industry and lifted the whole nation to undreamed levels of
production. Those who attack labor forget these simple truths, but
history remembers them.”

6. Foster
Critical Thinking in Our Schools

In
his article “The
Purpose of Education,” King
worried whether the educational system was failing. He wrote, “To
think incisively and to think for one’s self is very difficult. We
are prone to let our mental life become invaded by legions of half
truths, prejudices, and propaganda. At this point, I often wonder
whether or not education is fulfilling its purpose. A great majority
of the so-called educated people do not think logically and
scientifically… To save man from the morass of propaganda, in my
opinion, is one of the chief aims of education. Education must enable
one to sift and weigh evidence, to discern the true from the false,
the real from the unreal, and the facts from the fiction.”
Considering that many schools today value instructing what to think
rather than how to think, this battle for promoting critical thinking
is ongoing.

7.
Provide Free/Affordable Access to Health Care

“Of
all the forms of inequality, injustice in health care is the most
shocking and inhumane,” King declared in
a 1966 speech.
He hoped that in revealing the inequalities in treatment options for
people of different races, genders and class, the disparities could
be overcome. The fact that aiding the sick and dying – without
either forcing them into poverty or outright denying care – is
still up for debate is nothing short of a tragedy.

  1. Commit
    to Non-Violence

In
his essay “The
Power of Non-Violence,” King
explained the struggle in convincing his allies to resist the urge to
fight back against violent oppression. “It is not a method of
stagnant passivity and deadening complacency… This method is
nonaggressive physically but strongly aggressive spiritually.”
Though turning the other cheek takes restraint, King believed that
the side that is seen to suffer for its cause is more easily viewed
as righteous. He also knew that violence would not ultimately bring
about positive change: “The aftermath of violence is bitterness.
The aftermath of nonviolence is reconciliation and the creation of a
beloved community.”

————–

Although
the United States has certainly made major (but hardly complete)
strides in overcoming racism since King’s time, most of the other
justices he spoke out against are still as problematic as ever – if
not more so. Let us commemorate today by remembering that Dr. Martin
Luther King would not consider his campaign for change complete –
and, therefore, neither should we.

Photo
Credit: Library
of Congress

Zie ook:

‘Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd‘

‘NAVO, het grootste militaire verbond maakt zich schuldig aan grootschalige terreur i.p.v. de vrede te bewaren‘ (o.a. geluidsfragmenten met het protest van King tegen de oorlog in Vietnam)

‘Thomas Merton >> een kritische rk geestelijke vermoord in hetzelfde jaar als Robert F. Kennedy en Martin Luther King‘

‘Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969 >> mensenrechtenactivist vermoord door FBI en Chicago politie‘

‘Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht‘

‘Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..‘

‘De langzame moord op de ideeën van Martin Luther King…………….. Ofwel: Dr. Martin Luther Kings lessen willens en wetens verzwegen….‘

‘De oorlog tegen het arme deel van de VS bevolking‘

‘Martin Luther King misbruikt door Radio1‘

‘Paul Scheffer, het media-orakel met een ‘vlijmscherpe analyse’ over het racistische optreden van de politie in de VS……… AUW!!!‘

‘Willem Post over de zegeningen van het zero tolerance beleid in de VS en ach, het is misschien ietsje doorgeschoten…….‘


Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.

Charles Groenhuijsen ‘schreef een boek’, o.a. over psychopaat Trump

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Topgraaier en totaal afhankelijk ‘journalist’ Groenhuijsen was vanmorgen te horen op BNR (rond 11.35 u.). Hier liet hij zijn ‘licht’ schijnen op de Republikeinse presidentskandidaat en psychopaat Trump. Veel oeverloos gelul, zoals we gewend zijn van de vervelende praatjesmaker Groenhuijsen, uiteraard met veel reclame voor z’n laatste waardeloze boek…..

Uiteindelijk concludeerde Groenhuijsen, dat Trump best wel mee valt, want zo stelde Groenuijsen, hij was niet zo rijk geworden, als hij als een olifant door de porseleinkast zou zijn gelopen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Wat een inzicht!! De meeste van de grote bedrijven, zijn dit juist geworden, door als een oilifant door de spreekwoordelijke porseleinkast te banjeren…. Groenhuijsen gaf als voorbeeld, de belastingvoordelen, die Trump binnenhaalt voor zijn bedrijven, dat kan hij alleen voor elkaar krijgen, door heel omzichtig te werk te gaan……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Een heel leger advocaten zorgt daarvoor Groenhuijsen en de Republikeinen in het parlement (en voormalige VS regeringen) doen de rest!!!

As u erover dacht, het boek van deze fantast aan te schaffen, bespaar u de centen!!!

Voor mer berichten over/met Charles Groenhuijsen, VS, Republikeinse partij, Donald Trump, neoliberalisme en/of verkiezingen, klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Huffnagel (VVD expert in ‘belastingroof’) is nu ‘communicatie expert’, hij kan wel lachen om Trump…….

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

VVD onbenul en specialist in het uitdelen van cadeaus aan vrienden, betaald door de burgers in de vorm van belasting, Frits Huffnagel, was weer eens te horen op Radio1. Afgelopen zaterdagmiddag was hij te gast bij de publieke omroep van de Telegraaf WNL (nee, niet Wakker Nederland, maar Wij Nederland….. ha! ha! ha!), waar hij werd aangekondigd als ‘communicatiedeskundige…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!.

Het gesprek kwam op Donald Trump de fascistische psychopaat (oké, dat is eigenlijk dubbelop) en misdadige republikeinse presidentskandidaat, die Huffnagel liefkozend ‘de Don’ noemde. En ja, Huffnagel geniet van de optredens van die man en moet daar om lachen…… Lachen hè, als hij Mexicanen uitmaakt voor moordenaars, verkrachters en harddrugsdealers………. Dat is niets anders dan ongezouten racisme en uiterst gevaarlijk haatzaaien tegen een minderheid…….. Huffnagel zou met terugwerkende kracht ook geweldig hebben genoten van de retoriek die Hitler voorafgaand aan WOII bezigde, m.n. als hij het ‘bijvoorbeeld’ over Joden en politieke tegenstanders had en wat daarmee te doen……

Huffnagel had geen probleem ‘de Don’ te vergelijken met Pim Fortuin….. Zoals u wellicht weet, ik ben op z’n zachtst gezegd bepaald geen fan van Fortuin, maar ik weet zeker, als hij dit zou horen en hij Trump zou kennen, hij zich, bij wijze van spreken’ zou omdraaien in z’n graf…..

Het gesprek kwam nog even op de uitlating die Trump maakte over een presentator van FOX*, die hij na een vraaggesprek uitmaakte voor viswijf, dat niet alleen menstrueerde, maar ook bloed uit haar ogen had lopen (zou de lul een veel te zware dosis LSD op hebben gehad???). Nee, zo bedoelde ‘de Don’ dat niet, volgens Huffnagel, hij zou volgens deze VVD hufter niets over menstrueren hebben gezegd, alsof dat niet overduidelijk de bedoeling was van Trump….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De bedoeling van Trump was, om de felheid aan te geven, waarmee deze presentator hem aanpakte, aldus de lachende VVD luldoos Huffnagel……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Waarschijnlijk heeft Huffnagel zoiets, van je weet maar nooit hoe een koe een haas** vangt, voor ‘t zelfde geld (maar uiteraard het liefst voor een hele berg meer), kan ik nog eens solliciteren bij één van Trumps bedrijven……….

Zo waardeloos als Huffnagel was als wethouder, die je met terugwerkende kracht eigenlijk van corruptie zou kunnen beschuldigen, zo waardeloos is hij als ‘communicatie deskundige….’ Nooit geweten dat de taak van een communicatiedeskundige, het verdraaien van feiten is!!

Wat een enorme klootzak!!

*  Ongelofelijk maar waar: FOX had zelfs commentaar op opperploert Trump!!  

**      

               Afbeeldingsresultaat voor hoe een koe een haas vangt

Voor meer berichten over Huffnagel, Trump, FOX, FOX nieuws en/of WNL klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht

Weer ongewapende gekleurde tiener doodgeschoten door fascistenpolitie van de VS……..

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

Gistermorgen in het Radio1 nieuws van 11.00 u. het bericht, dat de politie van Arlington (VS) een ongewapende gekleurde jongen van 19 doodschoot, omdat deze op de vlucht sloeg voor de politie…… Dat was dan ook het eerste verweer van de plaatselijke politie daar….. Godverdomme als ik gekleurd was en in de VS woonde, zou ik me ook uit de voeten maken, als de fascistische politie me probeerde aan te houden, want dat ‘t daarna fout voor je afloopt, dodelijk of niet, is zeker……..

Wanneer staat er iemand op in ons land, die eist dat alle verdragen op juridisch gebied met de VS voorlopig maar eens in de koelkast moeten, tot daar werkelijk iets ten goede verandert……. Neem het ‘plea bargain’, dus zeggen dat je iets gedaan hebt, ook al is dat niet zo, daar je anders zeker weet, dat je voor veel meer jaren de gevangenis ingaat….. Een ‘land’ waar de barbaarse doodstraf nog wordt uitgevoerd…. Een land waar politici van één van de grote politieke partijen, de republikeinen durven te zeggen, dat voedselbonnen voor de armen uit den boze zijn, daar ze mensen ‘lui maken…’ Tot slot een land, waar het leven van de gekleurde medeburgers niets waard is en waar men optreedt tegen deze bevolkingsgroep, als waren het beesten, zoals ook dit geval weer eens aantoont, een bevolkingsgroep ‘die het verdient’ vermoord te worden door de politie…… Hoe kan Nederland godverdomme nog mensen uitleveren aan zo’n uiterst inhumne, racistische politiestaat??????

Ik zeg het nog maar eens: boycot producten uit de VS en ga niet met vakantie naar die racistische (en fascistische) politiestaat!!

Zie ook: ‘Honderdtwintig ongewapende VS burgers vermoord door politie in 2015…….‘

Voor meer berichten over de VS, plea bargain, doodstraf, uitlevering, moord, racisme en/of discriminatie (bij de laatste drie, vindt u ook ‘wat’ berichten over Nederland, waar de VS, door veel neoliberale politici, als groot voorbeeld wordt gezien…), klik op het desbetreffende label, onder dit bericht.

Zoals de Republikeinen in de VS, de arme bevolking het liefst laten creperen, zo willen de EU en het IMF de grote onderlaag in Griekenland laten verzuipen: een cartoon!

Posted on by Willem Wachtmeester

De volgende cartoon heb ik uit Daily Kos overgenomen. Je zou de woorden ‘The Republican lifeguard’ kunnen vervangen voor ‘De Europese badmeester’, waarbij je nog net de ‘handen van de Grieken’ boven het water uit ziet steken. Daar Griekenland alleen gered wordt vanwege de belangen die de landen in Noordwest-Europa in Griekenland hebben, dit doordat die landen, de op de pof geleverde kredieten van hun eigen banken aan Griekenland, hebben overgenomen……. Dit alles terwijl de belangen voor de al zwaar verarmde grote onderlaag in Griekenland, nog meer worden verkwanseld en een groot deel van de bevolking dreigt ‘te verdrinken in ellende….’


The Republican Lifeguard

RepublicanLifeguard

Het gaat in deze cartoon over de schoftenpraatjes die de Republikeinen in de VS uiten, als het gaat om mensen te helpen, die werkelijk niets meer hebben en hen zelfs de voedselbonnen willen afnemen, daar deze mensen er anders ‘afhankelijk van worden…….’ Genoeg inhumane Republikeinse psychopaten in de VS, die dit keihard durven te zeggen

Voor meer berichten over de Republikeinen in de VS klik op het label ‘Republikeinse partij’, en voor Griekenland en/of schuldenlanden, klik op het betreffende label, onder dit bericht,