Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

Alweer dagenlang worden we in het westen voorgelogen over wat er in Ghouta, Syrië gebeurt. De kroon op het gebied van valse voorlichting is weer eens weggelegd voor de BBC World Service radio, een station met ongelofelijk veel luisteraars…..

Afgelopen dinsdag was het de hele dag door anti-Syrie,uh ik bedoel anti-Assad propaganda-bal op de BBC W.S. Oost-Ghouta zou het volgende doelwit zijn van het ‘perfide’ Syrische bewind.

De bronnen voor al deze ongecontroleerde beweringen waren vertegenwoordigers van de aanwezige terreurgroepen in Oost-Ghouta, Al Qaida Syrië (door de VS van de terreurlijst gehaald), al-Nusra een zusterorganisatie van deze psychopaten, de White Helmets, een ondersteunende terreurgroep van al-Nusra en Al Qaida (met hoorspel) en SOHR, het Syrian Observatory voor Human Rights, een organisatie van een gevluchte Syrische misdadiger, gehuisvest in Engeland en ondersteund door de Britse overheid. En wie citeerde de SOHR? Precies al de hiervoor genoemde groepen!!

Oh, vergeet ik nog één heel belangrijke bron: een correspondent (v) van de BBC in Beiroet Libanon……. Deze dame had net zo goed haar verslag vanuit Londen kunnen doen…….

De redactie maakte overigens een kapitale fout, daar in één geluidsfragment een man was te horen, die stelde te hopen dat Oost-Ghouta snel bevrijd zou worden door de reguliere Syrische troepen, daar hij de terreur in zijn stad meer dan zat was!!

Daarover gesproken: men weet NB in het westen om welke terreurgroepen het gaat in Oost-Ghouta en men weet dat deze uiterst gewelddadig optreden tegen de bevolking, waarbij gelovigen van het verkeerde geloof of richting met een ‘een beetje geluk’ worden vermoord……… Waar halen de politici en de reguliere media het lef vandaan zo keihard te liegen, en dat door media en politici die de vuilbek vol hebben van ‘fake news’ (of nepnieuws, wat je wilt)……..

Men durft zelfs de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo aan te halen als voorbeeld voor de slachting in Ghouta. Terwijl er in vergelijking bij de ‘bevrijding’ van West-Mosul door ‘de Iraakse coalitie (o.l.v. de VS) in Irak enorm veel meer doden vielen dan in Oost-Aleppo….. Zo besloten Syrië en Rusland al twee maanden voor de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo te stoppen met bombardementen om zo burgerslachtoffers te voorkomen, iets waar men in het westen niet over repte……… In West-Mosul ging de VS gewoon door met bombarderen, ondanks meerdere smeekbedes van de VN….. Ook daar was geen belangstelling voor bij de reguliere westerse media en de meeste westerse politici……..

Er werd bij de BBC op die dag zelfs gesteld dat Aleppo ontvolkt is en de burgers zijn gevlucht naar het buitenland, echter na de bevrijding van IS en andere terreurgroepen door het Syrische leger*, trokken de gevluchte burgers in grote getale terug naar de stad………… (niet voor niets ook, dat Assad in 2014 met een grote meerderheid van stemmen werd verkozen tot president, onder zijn beheer was er vrede tussen de verschillende geloven…….)

Verder werden nog opnamen ten gehore gebracht ‘uit een ziekenhuis’, waar de microfoon vlak voor een huilende baby werd gehouden, uiteraard met het commentaar dat ‘Assads troepen’ expres dit ‘kinderziekenhuis’ had aangevallen…. De opnamen kwamen niet van een oorlogscorrespondent maar van de White Helmets, opnamen die men overal in elkaar kan zetten en daar zijn de White Helmets goed in……..

Een ‘hulporganisatie’ uit de VS stelde dat het Syrische bewind elke 24 uur een ziekenhuis bombardeert, dit bericht was te horen op WDR 5………

Het was overigens op de Nederlandse, Franse en Belgische radio al niets beter gesteld met de berichtgeving, walgelijk!

Zoals je zal begrijpen en/of zal hebben vernomen, wordt er met geen woord gerept over de beschietingen door Al Qaida met o.a. raketten en mortiergranaten vanuit Oost-Ghouta op woonwijken in het westen van Ghouta en Damascus; ach als daar slachtoffers bij vallen, inclusief baby’s en oudere kinderen, een kniesoor die daar op let……. Ik vraag me gvd af, waarom Nederlandse jihadstrijders en hun aanhang hier worden vervolgd, als je de politici en media over de situatie in Oost-Ghouta moet geloven, zijn het minstens helden!!

Vreemd is het ontbreken van berichtgeving over de slachtingen die Turkije aanricht in Syrië, blijkbaar is dat ook al niet niet belangrijk, terwijl dit land zich voor de zoveelste keer illegaal op Syrisch grondgebied bevindt, zoals ook de VS en het overgrote deel van de ‘gematigde terreurgroepen’ zich illegaal op Syrische bodem bevinden………

Dan durven landen als de VS, Frankrijk en Israël, die NB Syrië illegaal bombarderen en waar de eerste zich NB illegaal op Syrische bodem bevindt, Iran en Rusland te manen zich uit Syrië terug te trekken, terwijl die zich nu juist volkomen legaal op Syrische bodem bevinden….. Over de VS en Israël gesproken: de aanvallen van deze landen op het Syrische leger zijn als je die analyseert, gericht op het beschermen van terreurgroepen (zo werkt de VS o.a. samen met ‘Al Qaida Syrië….’)

Overigens werd er in Ghouta zogenaamd een gifaanval uitgevoerd in 2013, volgens het westers anti-Syrisch/Russisch propagandatuig, begaan door Assad, een aanval die later na VN onderzoek (zoals daarna keer op keer) aan terreurgroepen werd toegeschreven; valt me nog mee dat men deze ‘hoax’ niet nog een keer van stal haalde……..

Gisteren werd bekend gemaakt dat de Veiligheidsraad van de VN zich voltallig achter een staakt het vuren in Syrië heeft gesteld…… Het is duidelijk dat het Rusland en China dun door de broek loopt….. Ongelofelijk!

Eén ding is zeker: alle ellende in Syrië is te danken aan de VS, dat al vanaf 2006 bezig was met het organiseren van een opstand tegen Assad, waar het einddoel was een staatsgreep tegen Assad uit te lokken…. De redenen daarvoor: o.a. de weigering van Syrië een pijpleiding voor gas vanuit de Golfstaten richting Europa door Syrië toe te staan en natuurlijk de vriendelijke relaties van het regime Assad met Iran…….

Conclusie: alweer worden we zwaar besodemieterd!!

* Het Syrische leger dat door gelovigen van verschillende religies, hand in hand, werd verwelkomd)

Zie ook: CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering

        en: ‘Trumps buitenlandbeleid heeft de wereld naar de rand van WOIII gebracht…….

        en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint

        en: ‘Foreign Ministry: Some Western officials are complicit in the crimes of terrorists against civilians in Damascus and its countryside

        en: ‘Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

        en: ‘Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

        en: ‘Goutha haalt de koppen, terwijl de VS Jemen volpropt met wapens t.g.v. de genocide uitgevoerd door Saoedische coalitie……..

        en: ‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

        en: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

        en: ‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

         en: ‘SOHR, het orgaan dat door de reguliere media wordt aangehaald i.z. Syrië, is gevestigd in Coventry

PS: het aantal doden in het Iraakse West-Mosul overtreft het aantal doden dat in Oost-Aleppo en andere Syrische steden viel bij bevrijding door het reguliere Syrische leger……. Zelfs dat feit is geen reden voor de reguliere westerse media en politici in te binden met hun blinde kritiek op Syrië…… Voorts is het een normale zaak, dat een soeverein land het eigen grondgebied bevrijd van terreur, stel je iets dergelijks voor in Nederland……….

Beste bezoeker, dat was het voor deze dag, probeer er ondanks alle ellende een mooie dag van te maken, het weer werkt daar gelukkig wel aan mee.

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Trumps buitenlandbeleid heeft de wereld naar de rand van WOIII gebracht…….

Volkomen
terecht waarschuwt Darius Shahtahmasebi de wereld voor het gevaar van
het ‘buitenlandbeleid’ dat de Trump administratie voert.

Met
veel voorbeelden geeft Shahtahmasebi aan dat de VS ons op de rand van
Wereldoorlog III heeft gebracht en er niet veel voor nodig is om deze
oorlog daadwerkelijk te laten losbarsten……

Waar blijven de demonstraties tegen het terreurbeleid van de VS, die ons steeds dichter bij WOIII brengen???

Verdere
woorden overbodig, lees en oordeel zelf:

How
Donald Trump’s Policies Have Brought Us to the Brink of World War 3

February
20, 2018 at 11:55 

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — On
February 7, 2018, the U.S.-led coalition in Syria
 conducted
air and artillery strikes
 against
what were believed to be pro-government forces in response to an
“unprovoked attack” launched by these pro-regime troops. Not long
after, reports
 began
emerging
 that
significant numbers of Russian personnel were included in the over
100 dead and wounded. While Russia denied this at first, eventually,
the accepted version of events on both sides was that there were some
Russian nationals who did lose their lives in Syria. These Russians
are arguably mercenaries and contractors, not official troops.

This
is not the first time the U.S.-led coalition has struck
pro-government forces in Syria. Aside from Donald Trump’s 
grandiose
strike
 on
a Syrian airbase in April of last year, U.S. forces also 
conducted
multiple strikes
 against
Syrian and Iranian-backed forces as these factions began to encircle
the American military’s presence at a base in al-Tanf.

Donald
Trump has famously relaxed the
 Obama-era
restrictions
 on
calling in airstrikes, meaning commanders on the battlefield can call
in airstrikes at their disposal without any oversight. Previously, an
airstrike could not be launched on a whim and was required to go
through certain protocols before it could be delivered. Now, even
associated forces can call in American airstrikes on the battlefield.
The most infamous example of this is when Iraqi commanders called in
a U.S. strike that ended up killing well over
 200
civilians in a single bombardment
.

Barely
a week after Trump’s Syria strike in April, the U.S.
military
 dropped a
$450,000 bomb in Afghanistan dubbed the “Mother of all bombs”
(MOAB). It soon transpired that the decision to drop the bomb was not
made by Trump himself as commander-in-chief but by
 Gen.
John Nicholson
,
commander of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

It’s
time to ask yourself: Are you comfortable with commanders on the
battlefield calling in airstrikes even if those airstrikes could
potentially kill personnel on the ground belonging to another nuclear
power?

Last
Tuesday, Wisconsin Democrat Mark Pocan
 told
the 
Nation
 that “Congress
has never authorized force against Syrian, Turkish, Yemeni Houthi,
Russian, Iranian, or North Korean forces. Yet reportedly, a 
secret
administration memo may claim the legal justification to do just
that: attack Syrian, North Korean, and other forces without any
congressional authorization.” 
[emphasis
added]

According
to 
Lawfare
,
a lawsuit required the government to reveal a list of documents
relating to the April Syria strike, but not the actual documents
themselves. The court-ordered directions forced the government to
reveal that the seven-page secret memo Pocan was referring to was
drafted up by administration lawyers on April 6, 2017, just before
Trump’s infamous strike. The government’s declarations revealed
that only a few of the words on one of the memo’s pages are
classified, and they are related to facts, not legalities. Still, the
administration refuses to disclose the memo to the public, claiming
the document is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act.

I
am also concerned that this legal justification may now become
precedent for additional executive unilateral military action,
including this week’s U.S. airstrikes in Syria against pro-Assad
forces or even an extremely risky ‘bloody nose’ strike against
North Korea,”
 Senator
Tim Kaine (D-Va) said last week.

In
early February, the Pentagon released its much anticipated
2018
 Nuclear
Posture Review
.
From the 
Washington
Post’s 
Katrina
vanden Heuvel’s 
assessment:

The
review reaffirms the United States is ready to use nuclear weapons
first in an alarmingly wide range of scenarios. It remains ‘the
policy of the United States to retain some ambiguity regarding the
precise circumstances’ that might lead to a nuclear response. The
United States 
reserves the right to unleash
nuclear weapons first in ‘extreme circumstances’ to defend the
‘vital interests’ not only of the United States but also of its
‘allies and partners’ — a total of some 30 countries.
 ‘Extreme
circumstances,’ the review states explicitly, include 
significant
non-nuclear attacks,’ including conventional attacks on ‘allied
or partner civilian population or infrastructure.’ 
The
United States also 
maintains a ‘portion of
its nuclear forces’ on daily alert, with the option of launching
those forces ‘promptly.’ 
[emphasis
added]

The
U.S. has an active stockpile of at least 4,000 nuclear weapons,
rivaled only by Russia. 
According
to the Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR)
,
a “limited” regional exchange of nuclear weapons could force one
billion people to the point of starvation, and a week-long “regional”
encounter could kill far more than died during World War II.

As
Albert Einstein
 famously
said
, “I
know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World
War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

Heuvel
correctly summarized the current nuclear strategy:

In
sum, the United States is building a new generation of nuclear
weapons and delivery systems, will deploy more usable nuclear weapons
in ‘forward’ areas, remains committed to possible ‘first use’
of nuclear weapons even against non-nuclear attacks in defense of 30
countries, retains missiles on active alert ready to launch, is
skeptical of the possibility of any progress in arms control and is
hostile to the global movement to make nuclear weapons illegal. All
this as tensions with Russia and China rise, relations with North
Korea remain literally explosive, and the nuclear deal with Iran
stays under constant assault from the president.

One
thing we do know is that the U.S. is
 openly
considering nuclear strikes
 in
response to cyber-attacks, which could be conducted by anyone from
lone-wolf hackers to
 Iran,
North Korea, Russia, or China. We also know that the Trump
administration has been weighing a “limited” 
strike
on North Korea
 for
some time now, even as North and South Korea pursue a peaceful
dialogue of their own. Even now, the U.S. continues
to 
position nuclear-capable
B-52 and B-2 bombers around the Korean peninsula. The B-2 is the most
advanced bomber in the United States air force, capable of dropping
the military department’s biggest bomb, which weighs in at around
14,000 kilograms.

This
is a recipe for disaster. Donald Trump isn’t bringing the troops
home and focusing on “making America great again.” According to
the
 Department
of Defense
,
American troop deployments to the Middle East had increased 33
percent by the end of last year.

It’s
time for both sides of the political coin to confront their delusions
and face reality. Donald Trump is by far the
 most
hawkish, trigger-happy president
 to
have ever been sworn into office, which is no easy feat considering
his predecessors. His policies are leading the United States down a
dangerous path that could see a miscalculated strike on Syria,
Russia, Iran, North Korea, or even China — whether by mistake or by
design. Considering that strikes have already been underway in Syria
against the Syrian government and its allies, including Russia, these
policies are likely to lead to something far more explosive down the
line.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

=============================

PS: heb een bericht over de situatie in het Syrische Ghouta in voorbereiding. Ghouta waar de enorme westerse hysterie en hypocrisie in de reguliere media weer eens heeft toegeslagen, dit gesteund door het grootste deel van de westerse politici, terwijl men weet dat de moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen van Al Qaida, al-Nusra (in feite ‘Al Qaida Syrië’) en als het even kan de White Helmets tekeer gaan tegen de bevolking……. Waar is de kritiek op terreurgroep Al Qaida gebleven?? Alle berichten over ‘de slachting’ in Ghouta komen dan ook van die terreurgroepen en van Al Qaida’s White Helmets, met door hen geregisseerde video’s en hoorspelen……. Bij deze (op 25 februari 2018): ‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

‘Russische manipulatie van politiek in de VS’, maar geen woord als Netanyahu dit zelfs openlijk op de VS tv doet…….

Had
zelf al eens geschreven over de totale hysterie en hypocrisie in de VS en de rest van het westen over de zogenaamde bemoeienis van Rusland met de verkiezingen in de
VS en elders. Gisteren ontving ik echter een schrijven van Scott Roth die dit veel beter verwoordt.

Nog even dit: ondanks
dat daar nog geen flinter van bewijs voor is, blijven de reguliere
westerse media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici de leugens over Russische interventie in de verkiezingen herhalen. 

Vreemd genoeg interesseert het blijkbaar niemand als
de fascistische Palestijnenslachter Netanyahu hetzelfde doet (zoals in augustus vorig jaar), maar dan open en bloot, vertoond door de grote tv stations in de VS (beelden die zelfs in de rest van het westen werden getoond..), waar Netanyahu e.e.a. ook nog eens verwoordde in een ontmoeting met leden van het Congres….. (hoeveel echt bewijs voor manipulatie heb je nodig…?)

Ongelofelijk………

February
20, 2018

Dear Reader,

Last
week Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating alleged
Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, handed down
an indictment that charged thirteen Russian individuals and three
companies with all sorts of misdeeds in an effort to subvert the
election and swing it for Donald Trump. 

Whatever you think about the
issue of Russian intervention in our politics, it ought to be a
scandal how 
clear-cut
Israeli influence
 in
our politics is nothing but a sideshow, if even that. It’s
axiomatic in mainstream media attitudes about Israel that the
discussion will not meet the issues head-on, and the opinion makers
will invariably 
protect
Israel by shifting blame elsewhere
.
It’s a necessary and dare I say effective strategy because if the
mainstream press told the 
truth
about the quotidian violence
 of
the occupation, soon after a critical mass of Americans would
understand that reality and 
attitudes
like this would be the new norm.

Ayelet
Shaked, Israel’s Justice Minister, basically laid out the case
against Zionism
and
as Israel’s military-form of justice is administered in occupied
Palestine, 17-year-old 
Ahed
Tamimi’s
 case
keeps getting delayed. The judge announced the trial would be held
behind closed doors, as this would be in the 
“best
interest”
 of
a juvenile defendant. Orwell couldn’t have written this story if he
tried.

Have a pleasant week,Scott
Roth
Publisher,
Mondoweiss

Rusland heeft geen aanval uitgevoerd op VS troepen in Syrië…..

Op 7 februari jl. zouden Syrische troepen, gesteund door Russische adviseurs en huurlingen een basis van de Syrische democratische strijdmacht (SDF, of Syrian Democratic Forces) hebben aangevallen. Het gaat hier om ‘een door de VS gesteunde basis’ waar zich ook VS militairen dan wel adviseurs zouden hebben opgehouden of (nog) ophouden. Met hulp van VS luchtstrijdkrachten werd de aanval afgeslagen……

Vreemd genoeg vielen aan de kant van de aanvallers meer dan 100 strijders, voornamelijk Russen en viel er aan de kant van de door de VS gesteunde strijders (SDF is een terreurorganisatie) en VS militairen niet één slachtoffer, iets dat totaal ongeloofwaardig is.

Darius Shahtahmasebi stelt na ophef in de VS, waar Rusland wordt beschuldigt van het willens en wetens aanvallen van VS militairen, dat Rusland niet van de partij was bij de aanval, daar het hier ging om huurlingen en ‘militaire aannemers’.

Voorts stelt Shahtahmasebi terecht dat Rusland nog steeds op volkomen legitieme basis aanwezig is in Syrië, dit in tegenstelling tot de VS. Daarnaast is het uiteraard een normale zaak dat het reguliere Syrische leger, illegaal bezet Syrisch gebied wil heroveren, zo stelt ook Shahtahmasebi.

Rusland heeft intussen contracten gesloten met de Syrische overheid over de winning van gas en olie, ook in het gebied waar de aanval plaats vond……….. Gezien dat feit zou het niet vreemd zijn te veronderstellen, dat de VS als een bok op de haverkist het gebied koste wat kost wil behouden ‘voor de SDF’ (ofwel voor zichzelf) en daarbij alle ‘vijanden’ zal afslachten, die maar in de buurt durven te komen van dit gebied…….

Eerder in 2017 heeft de VS zich ook al geroerd met aanvallen in dit gebied, toen hielp de VS de SDF met het veroveren van dit gebied en ‘om deze positie te verdedigen’ blijft de VS illegaal gestationeerd in dit gebied….. Lees: de VS blijft aanwezig om olie en gas belangen van oliemaatschappijen in de VS te verdedigen…..

Shahtahmasebi stelt voorts dat wanneer Rusland een olierijk gebied in de VS illegaal zou bezetten en VS troepen zouden zich daartegen verzetten, niemand zou zeggen dat de Russen worden aangevallen (daar zij zich immers illegaal op het gebied van de VS zouden bevinden). Beetje vreemde redenering, daar een aanval nu eenmaal een aanval is, in wat voor omstandigheid dan ook, je spreekt in die gevallen van wel of niet gerechtvaardigd geweld en ja dan kan je ook spreken van (grootschalige) terreur als dit geweld niet gerechtvaardigd is, terreur waar de VS zich keer op keer schuldig aan maakt in Syrië, zoals ook weer in dit geval……

Dat de VS niets te zoeken heeft in Syrië is een feit, zeker als je ziet, dat de VS aan de wieg stond van IS, deze terreurgroep heeft vervoerd en vrije doorgang heeft verleend richting Syrië, waar de VS deze psychopaten ook nog eens deels heeft bewapend, terwijl de VS tegelijkertijd zogenaamd IS bestrijdt en ‘waarvoor de VS het nodig acht in Syrië te blijven……’ (zoals eerder gezegd: dit is vooral in het belang van de oliemaatschappijen in de VS…)

Jammer dat Shahtahmasebi daar geen aandacht aan besteed, zoals hij ook al niets zegt over het ontbreken van slachtoffers aan ‘VS zijde’, bij de hiervoor genoemde aanval..

In één ding heeft hij volkomen gelijk: Rusland heeft geen aanval geopend op de VS militairen. Alle acties van de VS tegen het reguliere Syrische leger en/of de Russen, zijn oorlogsmisdaden en daarmee grootschalige terreur! Je weet wel het soort terreur waar de westerse reguliere media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici zich niet druk om maken, dit gebeurd pas als VS terreur elders terreur uitlokt, zoals wraakacties in de straten van de EU……

Don’t
Be a Moron: Russia Didn’t Attack US Troops in Syria

February
19, 2018 at 10:08 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed)  On
February 16, 2018, 
Bloomberg’s Eli
Lake
 published an
article entitled “Don’t Be Fooled: Russia Attacked U.S. Troops in
Syria.”

For
context, the U.S.-led coalition
 conducted
air and artillery strikes
 against
what was believed to be pro-government forces in Syria on February 7,
2018, in response to an “unprovoked attack” launched by these
pro-regime forces. Not long after, reports
 began
emerging
 that
significant numbers of Russian personnel were included in the over
100 dead and wounded, though Russia denied this at first. As
the 
evidence
began to mount
,
the accepted version of events on both sides was that those involved
were Russian mercenaries and contractors, not official troops.

When
asked about the incident initially, U.S. Secretary of Defense James
Mattis
 said he
had “
no
idea why they [pro-government forces] would attack there, the forces
were known to be there, obviously the Russians knew.”

We
have always known that there are elements in this very complex battle
space that the Russians did not have, I would call it, control
of,”
 he
added.

In
response to this conundrum, Lake wrote:

Now,
it should be said that Mattis, a retired four-star Marine Corps
general, is a very smart man. His perplexity in this case is probably
what Plato called a ‘noble lie,’ a falsehood spoken by a leader
to achieve a greater social good. If Mattis acknowledges the obvious
— that the Kremlin authorized a direct assault on a U.S.-sponsored
base by non-uniformed personnel — he risks an escalation spiral in
Syria. Better to express bewilderment and give Russian President
Vladimir Putin a chance to back down and deny culpability, which he
ended up doing despite the heavy casualties suffered by his
mercenaries.”

Lake
added:

But
make no mistake: There is overwhelming evidence that those Russian
contractors were working at the behest of the Kremlin. What’s more,
the Russians knew U.S. military personnel were in Deir Ezzor, which
has been part of successive agreements to separate, or ‘deconflict,’
forces fighting in Syria.

First,
if the Kremlin did actually give the go-ahead for the advancement of
troops in that particular area, it is already quite apparent that the
aim of the pro-government troops in question, including their Russian
component, was to try to seize a lucrative Syrian oil field in the
vicinity. 
CBS reported that
according to Pentagon officials, the Russians did, indeed, have their
sights on these oil fields. 
CNN also
reported this before it was made aware that the Syrian troops
involved Russian contractors.

Russia
was recently 
granted exclusive
rights over Syria’s oil and gas production, and Deir Ez-zor is
Syria’s most oil-rich region. So, with regard to the perplexity as
to why Syrian and/or Russian personnel would launch an offensive, the
reasoning is already well-known. The U.S. provided air cover for
Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) to retain a substantial portion of
this area in 2017 and
 retains
its military presence there
 in
order to enable SDF’s occupation to continue.

Second,
and most important, if Syrian forces, backed by Russian forces
(whether they are official troops or not), decide to launch an
offensive to retake one of its oil fields, it is not the U.S. that is
under the attack. The U.S. is an invading force that has been bombing
Syria since 2014 without legal justification and continues to
maintain an illegal military presence in order to carry out its
dangerous foreign policy agenda. It wouldn’t matter if the U.S. had
one troop on the ground in Syria and if Russia had ten thousand —
Russia’s presence has been sanctioned under international law and
America’s hasn’t.

Yes,
Russia knew U.S. personnel were in Deir Ez-zor. But that doesn’t
mean Russia and Syria should be barred from reclaiming the territory
under international law. If Russia had set up an illegal base in an
oil-rich part of the U.S. and American troops launched an offensive
with their allies to retake the territory, no one in their right mind
would try to suggest that Russian troops were subsequently under
attack. In fact, if this particular scenario were to play out, the
NATO 
charter
would require
 all
of America’s NATO allies to come to its aid against this
hypothetical Russian aggression.

It
doesn’t matter what one thinks of the Syrian government and the
various allegations against it. Even for the sake of argument, we
should assume that all of the allegations against Bashar al-Assad are
true. It doesn’t make a difference.

The
U.S. has attacked Syria, and it could be the case that Syria and its
allies want to drive them out, as is their right. That’s the only
way to properly view this issue if we want to maintain a workable
system of international mutual respect and cooperation. Right now,
there only appears to be one flawed system: the U.S. and its allies
doing whatever they like until they are eventually confronted by a
formidable adversary that possesses nuclear weapons.

Op-ed
Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

====================================

Zie ook: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘Hondsdolle VS valt Russische tank aan in poging de Russen te provoceren……

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘Syrië: VS en Israëlische agressie dreigt de wereld in een oorlog te storten……


        en:  VS coalitie valt Syrische troepen aan……… Ofwel de strijd van de VS tegen IS, is in feite een strijd tegen de democratisch gekozen regering Assad……..

Duitse leger klaagt over tekort aan warme kleding en wil daarom groter budget…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

In het kader van de algehele Rusland demonisatie en daarvoor zoveel mogelijk geld los te peuteren, heeft de Deutsche Bundeswehr (uiteraard met de hulp van lobbyisten t.b.v. het militair-industrieel complex) een klaagzang op touw gezet: er is te weinig warme kleding voor de deelname van haar troepen aan de NAVO flitsmacht…..

De hoogste tijd dat een onafhankelijke organisatie de uitgaven van het Duitse leger controleert, immers hoe is het mogelijk dat met zo’n enorm budget dit leger niet instaat is warme kleding voor haar militairen aan te schaffen…..???

Te zot voor woorden!

Ik moet toegeven dat het me meeviel geen vergelijkingen te hebben gehoord met de nog veel grotere uitgaven voor defensie, uh ik bedoel oorlogsvoering, die de VS doet voor haar grootschalige terreuruitoefening in het buitenland.

Bron: WDR 5 rond 13.25 u. vanmiddag.

* De NAVO flitsmacht is vooral op touw gezet om de NAVO verder in te zetten bij het treiteren van de Russen en het uitlokken van geweld door dat land, een opzet die tot op heden geen succes had, ondanks alle pogingen die de VS en haar oorlogshond de NAVO hebben ondernomen, daarbij werd zelfs een verdrag met Gorbatsjov getorpedeerd, om zo aan de westgrens van Rusland te geraken…. ‘Uiteraard’ wordt daarbij de bevolking in het westen voorgelogen dat Rusland een gevaar is voor hun leven….. Je begrijpt dat het juist andersom is: de NAVO en haar feitelijke baas, de VS, zijn een direct gevaar voor ons leven….. Neem alleen al de uitlatingen van de regeringen in de VS en Groot-Brittannië, waarin men de mogelijkheid tot een kernaanval niet uitsluit, zelfs als vergelding voor een cyberaanval…….

PS: zo’n controle zou ook in Nederland op haar plaats zijn, immers hier verdwijnen zelfs defensiegelden…… Trouwens buiten dat, efficiënt is defensie al helemaal niet als het gaat om het uitgeven van geld, waarmee zelfs wordt gefraudeerd, zoals onlangs bleek met dienstauto’s en andere militaire voertuigen…. Ondanks dat heeft de top van de Nederlandse Defensie het gore lef te klagen over te lage budgetten (daarnaast: in vergelijking met de Rusland geeft alleen de EU al meer dan 3 keer zoveel uit aan ‘defensie……’)……..

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

Het volgende artikle vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke, die het overnam van LewRockwell.com.

In dit artikel legt Paul Craig Roberts uit, dat ‘Russiagate’ een complot tegen Trump is en werd uitgevoerd door de CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het Democratic National Committee (DNC). 

Trump vormde een gevaar voor de macht en budgetten van het militair-industrieel complex, daar hij de relatie met Rusland wilde normaliseren, hetzelfde Rusland dat onder Obama nog werd afgeschilderd als ‘Amerika’s meest gevaarlijke vijand…..’ Het militair-industrieel complex heeft zoveel mogelijk ‘conflicten’ (oorlogen en dreiging van oorlogen) nodig om haar macht en de enorme winsten te behouden……..

Daarnaast vormde Trump een bedreiging voor de grote geldstromen die de Clinton Foundation genereerde en de beide Clintons (Bill en Hillary) zou dwarszitten bij het worden van multimiljonairs…..

Lees het volgende artikel van Roberts en laat je niet langer wijsmaken dat Rusland de VS presidentsverkiezingen (en verkiezingen elders) zou hebben gemanipuleerd dan wel manipuleert!*

anti-state
anti-war pro-market

Rosenstein
and Mueller Running for Cover Leaving Brennan Exposed

By Paul
Craig Roberts

PaulCraigRoberts.org

February
19, 2018

Now
the Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein confirms what I told you in my
previous post. 
Mueller
found no evidence
 that
Russia had any impact on the outcome of the 2016 election.

So
what was Russiagate all about?

It
was exactly, precisely what I told you it was about from the very
begining. It was a conspiracy orchestrated by the military/security
complex, CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic National
Committee against Donald Trump.

Trump’s
emphasis during his presidential campaign on normalizing relations
with Russia, which the neocon Obama regime had turned into “America’s
most dangerous enemy,” was a threat to the power and budgets of the
military/security complex. Without a demonized enemy, what is the
justification for a 1,000 billion annual budget and the laws passed
in the 21st century that completely destroy the protections provided
by the US Constitution?

From
the Clinton/DNC standpoint, a Trump victory would halt the vast
riches pouring into the Clinton/DNC pockets from “pay to play.”
The Clinton Foundation and the Clintons themselves were on their way
to both being billionaires with the DNC collecting the registration
fees. This was a model for one party rule. And along comes Donald
Trump.

I
doubt Trump knew what he was stepping into. So far he has been unable
to function as President. But now that the FISA** court has on record
Rosenstein and Comey’s confessions that the spy warrants requested
by the FBI to spy on Trump are based on deception of the court, the
conspirators against Trump face indictment, conviction, and prison,
if Trump has the balls, which he might not have. We cannot even be
sure Trump understands the situation.

What
perhaps has surely happened is that former CIA director John Brennan
is now exposed by the total failue of Mueller to find a Trump/Putin
conspiracy against American democracy. Rosenstein’s statement that
“there is no allegation in [Mueller’s] indictment that any
American was a knowing particiipant in this illegal activity [illegal
activity is an unsubstantiated assertion only]. There is no
allegation in the indictment that the [Russians’] conduct altered
the outcome of the election.”

Brennan
as CIA director had lied under oath to Congress to the contrary.

Rosenstein
and Comey are trapped in their confessions to the FISA court that the
FBI obtained spy warrants from the court via deception of the court.
See 
here.

What
we must ask ourselves is how it is possible in the Great American
Democracy that people totally devoid of all integrity, all honesty,
all respect for truth can be confirmed by the US Senate as heads of
the CIA, FBI, and National Intelligence?

How
is it possible that these utterly corrupt people can go before the
House and Senate continuously and tell lies under oath and never be
held accountable?

How
is it possible that American Democracy is so utterly weak that
nothing whatsoever can be done about it?

What
kind of America is it when it is ruled by blatant transparant lies?

In
what sense do The People exist?

The
Best of Paul Craig Roberts

Paul
Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and
former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been
reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A
new edition of his book, 
The
Tyranny of Good Intentions
,
co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented account of how
americans lost the protection of law, has been released by Random
House. Visit 
his
website
.

Copyright © 2018 Paul
Craig Roberts

Previous
article by Paul Craig Roberts:  
Russia
Is in the Crosshairs

Why
I Could Never Get an FBI Security Clearance

==================================

*  Voor het tegenovergestelde, de lange rij van VS bemoeienissen bij verkiezingen elders zie: ‘Former CIA Chief Admits US Meddles in Foreign Elections… For Their Own Good‘ (later zal ik hier nog een bericht over brengen)

** FISA: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (uit 1978)

Zie ook:

Geen rectificaties voor meer dan 2 jaar brengen van fake news over het kwaadaardig sprookje Russiagate

Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten

‘Fake news’: alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn

Two More Spiegel Employees Out After Fake News Scandal Expands‘ Ofwel: het zoveelste ‘gevalletje fake news’, gebracht door de reguliere massamedia……..

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

Russiagate gelovigen krijgen nieuwe klap: WikiLeaks kreeg de DNC mails van een klokkenluider, niet van Rusland…..

De verregaande anti-Russische propaganda in de VS en de rest van het westen

WhatsApp beperking in strijd tegen fake news

Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd

World Economic Forum: de plek waar men elkaar feliciteert met de censuur op de sociale media

Massamedia VS vallen keihard door de mand met ‘vers’ geschoten Russiagate bok >> publiek wordt om vertrouwen gevraagd

Jacht in VS op alternatief (echt) nieuws in volgend stadium: journalist wordt vastgehouden zonder aanklacht

Lichtgelovige ‘atheïst’ gelooft Russiagate leugens….

NewsGuard, het nieuwste wapen van Big Brother VS tegen de alternatieve media

Netflix censureert aflevering van humoristisch programma, ‘na een geldig verzoek’ op grond van Saoedische wetgeving….

Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots

‘Fake news’: alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Democraten deden zich voor als Russen in false flag operatie om Roy Moore (Republikein) zwart te maken tijdens verkiezing…..

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….‘ (zie ook de verdere links over Russiagate in dat bericht)

Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega’s voor zot uitgemaakt

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

     

 ‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen‘ (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!


Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

CIA de ware hacker en manipulator van verkiezingen, ofwel de laatste Wikileaks documenten……...’

CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands)

Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Kaspersky Lab (antivirus) aangevallen met agressief ‘Grapperhaus virus’

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………‘ 

Zijlstra’s leugen is vervolgbaar onder de Neurenbergse principes……

De NAVO oorlogsagenda blootgelegd met de Nederlandse leugen over de agressie van Putin……

Op BBC
World Service radio werd vanmorgen in
‘News Hour Extra’ één grote anti-Rusland propaganda show
opgevoerd, uiteraard gecombineerd met het ophemelen van de VS en de
NAVO, plus een groot pleidooi voor meer geld naar defensie, uh
oorlogsvoering….. Dit met 
een aantal ‘deskundigen’ (allen anti-Rusland), waaronder Clingendael oorlogshitser en flapdrol de luxe Zandee……

De naam
van het programma werd eerder ter discussie gesteld, en naar aanleiding van inzendingen gedaan door luisteraars (dat moet je maar geloven) wordt de naam veranderd van ‘News
Hour Extra’ in ‘The Real Story…..’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Maak er maar ‘
Propaganda Hour Extra’ van! Blijkbaar moet de nieuwe naam van te voren al aangeven dat je hier niet met nepnieuws te maken krijgt, belachelijk!!

Op
Information Clearing House bracht men (ook al vandaag) een artikel
over de leugen van Zijlstra, een leugen die volgens de schrijver Finian
Cunningham 2 jaar oud is, echter deze dateert niet alleen uit 2006, maar wordt sinds die tijd regelmatig aangehaald door Zijlstra (plus andere vooral VVD politici) en een aantal reguliere media organen!!

Volgens
Cunningham legt dit ten overvloede nog eens de NAVO oorlogsagenda
bloot. Zo werd de door de VS op poten gezette opstand die in de
Oekraïense coup resulteerde, omgedraaid in agressie en expansiedrift
van Rusland…… Uiteraard overgoten met de VS propagandamachine
leugens over een annexatie van De Krim en het binnenvallen van
Rusland in Oost-Oekraïne…….. Beiden flagrante leugens waar geen nanometer bewijs voor is!

Voorts
komt Cunningham met andere voorbeelden die dit beeld staven, al moet
ik zeggen dat er voorbeelden te over zijn, neem alleen al de expansie
van de NAVO richting Moskou, waar de NAVO nu, in tegenspraak met
gesloten overeenkomsten (met Gorbatsjov), voor een groot deel van de Russische
westgrens staat…….. Cunningham komt met de leugen van de voormalig minister van buitenlandse zaken in Polen, Sikorski: hij zou naar eigen zeggen persoonlijk hebben gehoord dat Rusland en Polen in een overleg Oekraïne onder elkaar verdeeld hadden………. Een leugen die na doorprikken naarstig werd ingetrokken door deze liegende hufter…… Sikorski is overigens een ‘christendemocraat’, die van zijn god blijkbaar keihard mag liegen en ophitsen tot oorlog…….  

Terecht stelt Cunningham dat de Nederlandse regering de leugen gebruikt van de geheime diensten dat ze een aan de Russische regering gelieerde groep zou hebben gehackt en hebben gezien dat de Russen de Democraten in de VS hebben gehackt (zodat niet hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, maar Trump de verkiezingen heeft gewonnen), iets waarvoor alweer geen flinter bewijs is geleverd…….. Een smerige leugen die wordt gebruikt voor het propageren van de ‘Sleepwet’ die hier ter discussie staat en waar volgende maand in een referendum, tegelijk met de gemeenteraadsverkiezingen, over gestemd kan worden.

Ondanks een kleine uitglijder (waar het echte feit het verhaal in feite
alleen nog meer ondersteunt), een prima analyse! Hierin stelt Cunningham onder meer dat de leugen van Zijlstra in feite aanzet tot oorlog en dat is strafbaar onder de ‘Neurenbergse principes…’

Dutch
Lies Over Putin’s ‘Aggression’ Expose NATO War Agenda

By
Finian Cunningham

February
15, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – Netherlands Prime Minister Mark
Rutte was this week forced to bear a parliamentary vote of no
confidence after his foreign minister finally came clean over a
dangerous lie he has been telling for two years concerning Russian
President Vladimir Putin.


Halbe
Zijlstra quit in shame on Monday as the country’s foreign minister
after 
admitting that
a story he had peddled about personally hearing Putin plotting to
create a “greater Russia” was false. That then forced premier
Rutte to endure a “no confidence” motion from parliamentarians.
In the end, Rutte 
survived the
vote. If a majority had voted against his leadership, his coalition
government may have collapsed.

But
the deep damage done to the Dutch authorities will not be so easily
repaired by Rutte’s survival as premier. What has been exposed this
week is a senior member of government recklessly telling bare-faced
lies in an attempt to slander Russia, poison international relations,
and ratchet up already dangerous geopolitical tensions.

Zijlstra
had claimed two years ago, in 2016, that he had personally witnessed
Russian leader Vladimir Putin boasting about creating a “greater
Russia” which, it is claimed, would incorporate Ukraine, the Baltic
states, Belarus and Kazakhstan.

The
newly resigned Dutch top diplomat claimed he heard Putin making the
remarks while present with others at the Russian leader’s dacha
(summer house) back in 2006. 

This
week, Zijlstra finally came clean and admitted before parliament that
he hadn’t in fact been present at the alleged gathering. He still
maintains, however, that a confidant who was among the guests at
Putin’s dacha informed him of the alleged “greater Russia”
plan. But how can we now trust the word of a self-confessed liar?

Zijlstra’s
boss, Prime Minister Rutte, also sought to downplay the debacle,
claiming that his foreign minister had made “a big mistake” –
but that “lying was not a deadly sin”.

Rutte
is in for a rude awakening due to his complacent thinking. For indeed
his government has been caught telling a very grave lie whose
ramifications concern issues of war and peace in Europe.

Disgraced
former minister Zijlstra stands accused of gross distortion of
Russia’s foreign policy.

Since
the US and European-backed illegal coup in Ukraine in early 2014,
geopolitical reality has been turned upside-down. American and
European corporate media have peddled relentless anti-Russia
propaganda accusing Moscow of “aggression” and “expansionism”
in Europe.

This
torrent of Russophobia spewed out by Washington, the Pentagon, NATO
and the European Union has created the worst crisis in relations with
Russia since the Cold War ended nearly three decades ago. There are
real fears that the mounting crisis could escalate into an all-out
war involving nuclear powers.

Zijlstra’s
offense therefore is not merely a “mistaken” lie. His flagrant
public distortion has contributed directly to the grave deterioration
in geopolitical relations. One could even argue such reprehensible
remarks amount to incitement of war, which is a cardinal crime under
Nuremberg legal principles.

Lamentably,
the mendacious senior Dutch politician is not an isolated case.
Recall how former Polish foreign minister Radek Sikorski was caught
out telling similar defamatory lies about Russia in 2014.

Sikorski,
who has been an ardent supporter of NATO force build-up against
Russia, reportedly claimed that he personally overheard Vladimir
Putin in 2008 plotting to annex Ukrainian territory in a covert plot. 

Sikorski claimed that he heard Putin propositioning then Polish Prime
Minister Donald Tusk with a carve-up deal of Ukraine between Poland
and Russia.


Sikorski
was obliged to swiftly 
retract the
claims published in US media, and awkwardly admitting that he was not
present at the alleged meeting with Putin, and that his quoted
remarks were meant as a “surreal joke”.

But,
again, this is no joke or mistake. It is deadly serious
disinformation by senior government officials, which is recklessly
inciting war tensions with Russia. Sikorski is prominently associated
with pro-NATO think-tanks like the hawkish American Enterprise
Institute. He is married to Anne Applebaum who makes a living from
writing anti-Russian screeds for news outlets like the Washington
Post.


Zijlstra
and Sikorski join the ranks of Russophobia regurgitated by other
European foreign ministers like Britain’s Boris Johnson who issued
the outlandish 
claim earlier
this year that Russia is “targeting” British infrastructure; or
French foreign minister Jean-Yves Le Drian who has 
impugned Russia
for chemical weapons use in Syria – only for the French President
Emmanuel Macron to 
admit this
week that his government has actually no evidence about the use of
such weapons in Syria.

Macron
has made his own contribution to Russophobia by leveling
unsubstantiated allegations that his presidential election campaign
last year was “hacked” by Kremlin agents. He has since banned
Russian news media from attending his press conferences.


All
these senior government figures are irresponsibly fueling a climate
of demonization against Russia which is compounding other unhinged
claims made by politicians in Washington and the Baltic states.
Lithuanian President Dalia Grybauskaite, for example,
recently 
claimed that
Russian Iskander missiles based on Russian sovereign territory of
Kaliningrad were targeting half of Europe, an alarmist claim which
has been amplified by US secretary of defense James Mattis in the
Pentagon’s recent 
Nuclear
Posture Review
.

The
climate of hysteria – based on false, fevered official claims –
is militating against normal political and diplomatic relations,
which is, in turn, exacerbating the war in Ukraine and leading to
wider war tensions with Russia across Europe.

A
good question is why the ousted Dutch minister decided to own up this
week to his lies about Putin.

The
answer may be related to the bigger credibility crisis of the Dutch
government and its NATO allies with regard to the whole Russophobia
propaganda war.


Next
month, the Netherlands is to hold a national 
referendum on
extending powers of Dutch state intelligence to monitor public
electronic communications. To convince the Dutch public to vote for
more snooping powers, the authorities are relying on the hackneyed
claims about Russian “meddling” and “interference”.


It
seems significant that Dutch media 
reported last
month that the country’s secret services allegedly “hacked into”
Russian state hackers who were allegedly penetrating the American
Democratic party’s databases during the US presidential elections
back in 2015-2016. As usual, no evidence was provided to support the
claims. We know from other credible 
reports that
the Democratic party was quite possibly not hacked at all, but rather
was leaked from inside by a Democrat staffer. So the Dutch intel
story smearing Russia is highly dubious.

But
it seems that the purported “good deed” performed by the Dutch
intelligence services was pitched in the media as a way to ingratiate
bona fides with the Netherlands public. The aim being to dispose the
public toward voting in the referendum next month to give the Dutch
state more intrusive powers over citizens to “protect” them from
“nefarious Russians”.

Now,
if the Dutch minister had held on to his office any longer there was
a risk that his lies may have become public embarrassingly close to
the March referendum, which could have resulted in the public
rejecting the authorities’ desire for more snooping powers.

Perhaps
then the decision was taken in high office for the minister to take
the fall now in order to get rid sooner of an embarrassing story
concerning his lies over Russia.

Whatever
the explanation about the timing, the admission of Dutch government
lying about Russian aggression in Europe is nevertheless an
illuminating and appalling insight into how Russophobia and war is
being fomented by the US and its European NATO allies.

Abominably,
European government officials are willing to risk plunging millions
of citizens into a war with Russia based on lies and warped,
self-serving prejudices.


This
article was originally published by “
Strategic
Culture Foundation

-See
Also –

U.S.
Democrats push $1 billion bill for election security

=====================================

Zie ook: ‘Zijlstra heeft gelogen, liegt en zal blijven liegen, al helemaal als het over Rusland gaat…….

       en: ‘Zijlstra terecht afgetreden wegens anti-Russische propaganda, nu Rutte nog……..

       en: ‘Zijlstra de VVD leugenaar wordt beweend, nu even de andere kant!‘ (cartoons en prenten)

Hondsdolle VS valt Russische tank aan in poging de Russen te provoceren……

Anti-Media
bracht gisteren het ANTIWAR bericht
dat het uiterst agressieve VS, de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, met een drone een Russische T-72 tank in Syrië heeft uitgeschakeld, waarbij drie militairen omkwamen…… Dit nadat de VS vorige week in Syrië, naar het zich laat aanzien 100 Russische militaire adviseurs heeft vermoord….. 

Voor
beide zaken kwam de VS met het excuus dat dit uit zelfverdediging
was. De schrijver van het artikel, Jason Ditz stelt terecht het
uiterst vreemd te vinden dat bij ‘een aanval’ op aan de VS gelieerde
terreurgroepen, 100 strijders aan Russische kant werden uitgeschakeld, zonder dat er ook
maar één dode ‘aan VS kant’ is gevallen, ofwel: die strijders werden willens en
wetens aangevallen door de VS.

De
drone zou de tank hebben aangevallen, daar deze een gevaar vormde
voor de drone…… ha! ha! ha! ha! Zo’n drone kan vanaf grote
afstand een tank, ander voertuig of gebouw vernietigen, prettige
wedstrijd als je met een tank zo’n drone wilt uitschakelen…….

Deze
zaken duiden erop dat de VS bezig is een oorlog uit te lokken met
Rusland (zie ook de doorlopende NAVO oefeningen langs de Russische
grens, waarbij onlangs straaljagers van de VS hun transponders hebben
uitgezet…..)

Hoelang
blijven de westerse regeringen de psychopathische massamoordenaar VS
steunen en dat wat betreft Nederland gvd met ons belastinggeld!!!

US
Drone Destroys Russian Tank in Syria, Killing Three

February
14, 2018 at 6:17 am

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM) — As
details continue to emerge of last week’s US attacks on pro-Syrian
forces, it appears that 
dozens,
or by some accounts scores
,
of the slain were actually Russian military contractors working for
the Syrian government. The raises the stakes about US attacks in
Syria fueling a direct conflict with Russia.

Over
the weekend, the US struck again, with officials now confirmed that a
US MQ-9 Reaper drone attacked and destroyed a Russian T-72 tank in
Eastern Syria, in what 
US
officials are claiming was an act of “self-defense.

Lt.
Gen. Jeffrey Harrigian says the drone saw the tank “that took a
shot at us,” and that he believes the US rules of engagement
allowed for the tank to be destroyed in self-defense to protect the
drone. Three people within were killed.

As
to who they killed, US officials are no more forthcoming than they
ever are, with Lt. Gen. Harrigian saying the US is “not going to
speculate” on who they killed, and that they flat out don’t know
whose tank it was, or who was driving it.

Which
isn’t a great excuse because tanks are usually well-marked as to
their owners/operators, and while both Russia and Syria are two of
the top three extent operators of such tanks, there are massively
different ramifications for the US to have destroyed a Syrian tank of
Russian origin or to have deliberately attacked and destroyed a
Russian tank.

While
the US has claimed all of its recent attacks on pro-Syrian forces in
the country as “self-defense,” the claim rings hollow since
they’ve killed in excess of 100 people while sustaining no
casualties of their own, and doubly so in this latest case because
they were defending a drone by killing three soldiers of unknown
origin.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

===================================

Zie ook: ‘Rusland heeft geen aanval uitgevoerd op VS troepen in Syrië…..

        en: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘Syrië: VS en Israëlische agressie dreigt de wereld in een oorlog te storten……

Zijlstra de VVD leugenaar wordt beweend, nu even de andere kant!

Hier een aantal prenten, cartoons van Links_huftertje, die ik je niet wil onthouden:

 Feb 12

Ook in alle gemeenteraden dadelijk………..

 Feb 12

Bij de VVD wordt nooit gelogen.

 Feb 12

Integriteit ?

      

 Feb 12

Onze man in Moskou……….vol

 Feb 12

Alternatieve feiten en Halbe waarheden

Zie ook: ‘Zijlstra heeft gelogen, liegt en zal blijven liegen, al helemaal als het over Rusland gaat…….

       en: ‘Zijlstra terecht afgetreden wegens anti-Russische propaganda, nu Rutte nog……..

       en: ‘Zijlstra’s leugen is vervolgbaar onder de Neurenbergse principes……