False Flag operaties ofwel terreur, dit is het moedwillig schade toebrengen aan eigen zaken dan wel zaken als het vermoorden van eigen burgers of burgers elders, met de opzet een tegenstander de schuld te geven, worden afgedaan als samenzweringstheorieën of complottheorieën. Echter een groot aantal feiten en bekentenissen bewijzen dat deze terreur wel degelijk bestaat en dat al heel lang………
In feite werd dit al duidelijk uit de Vault 7 en Vault 8 documenten op Wikileaks, waaruit bleek, dat de CIA en NSA over een groot aantal ‘instrumenten’ beschikken, waarmee men via het internet zaken kan manipuleren door te hacken en de schuld daarvoor in de schoenen van een ‘vijandige’ staat kan schuiven. in feite een ‘false flag’ operatie………
VS Generaal H.R. McMaster zei gisteren dat de vijanden van de VS, Rusland en China, plus extreem rechtse en linkse activisten vitriool spuien op het internet om het volk aan het twijfelen te brengen over de maatschappij waarin zij leven…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! E.e.a. werd een uur geleden gemeld op BBC World Service (rond 12.09 u. CET), ook al kan McMaster niet één bewezen feit opnoemen (zoals gewoonlijk in dit soort angst- en haatzaaierij)……. Als er nu één ‘land’ is dat zich wel bewezen met dergelijke zaken bezighoudt, is het de VS zelf wel!!
Van een aantal zaken was ik wel op de hoogte en toch verbaasde mij het enorme aantal ‘false flag operaties’, die niet zelden tot een enorm aantal moorden, nou zeg maar gerust ‘massamoorden’ hebben geleid, neem de aanleiding voor de illegale oorlogen die de VS voerde tegen Noord-Vietnam (plus tegelijkertijd in het geheim tegen andere landen in de regio) en Irak…..
Ook terreuraanslagen in Europa waren niet zelden ‘false flag operaties’, ofwel ‘false flag terreur…’
Overigens niets nieuws onder de zon, er bestaan al meer dan 2.000 jaar van dit soort operaties.
Het volgende artikel vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke, het origineel komt van Newsweek (een regulier nieuwsmedium*), van Houcke nam het over van WashingtonsBlog. Lezen mensen en geeft het door, je weet niet wat je leest!! Hiermee maken wat mij betreft de uitdragers van ‘Russische manipulaties’ in de VS presidentsverkiezingen en manipulaties in EU landen, zich voorgoed totaal ongeloofwaardig (al waren deze beweringen al langer bewezen lariekoek).
There
Are Now So Many Admissions by Government Officials of False Flag
Terror that Only the Willfully Ignorant Still Doubt the Reality
of the Concept
← Newsweek: “U.S. Government Planned False Flag Attacks to Start War”
Posted
on December
17, 2017 by WashingtonsBlog
Presidents,
Prime Ministers, Congressmen, Generals, Spooks, Soldiers and Police
ADMIT to False Flag Terror
Scores
of government officials throughout the world have admitted (either
orally, in writing, or through photographs or videos) to carrying out
– or seriously proposing – false flag attacks:
-
Japanese
troops set off a small explosion on a train track in 1931, and
falsely blamed it on China in order to justify an invasion of
Manchuria. This is known
as the
“Mukden Incident” or the “Manchurian Incident”. The Tokyo
International Military Tribunal found:
“Several of the participators in the plan, including Hashimoto [a
high-ranking Japanese army officer], have
on various occasions admitted their
part in the plot and have stated that the object of the ‘Incident’
was to afford an excuse for the occupation of Manchuria by the
Kwantung Army ….” And see this,
this and this.
(2)
A major with the Nazi SS admitted at
the Nuremberg trials that – under orders from the chief of the
Gestapo – he and some other Nazi operatives faked several attacks
on their own people and resources which they blamed on the Poles, to
justify the invasion of Poland. The staged attacks included:
The
details of the Gleiwitz radio station incident include:
On
the night of 31 August 1939, a small group of German operatives
dressed in Polish uniforms and led by Naujocks seized the Gleiwitz
station and broadcast a short anti-German message in Polish (sources
vary on the content of the message). The Germans’ goal was to make
the attack and the broadcast look like the work of anti-German Polish
saboteurs.
To
make the attack seem more convincing, the Germans used human corpses
to pass them off as Polish attackers. They murdered Franciszek
Honiok, a 43-year-old unmarried German Silesian Catholic farmer known
for sympathizing with the Poles. He had been arrested the previous
day by the Gestapo. He was dressed to look like a saboteur, then
killed by lethal injection, given gunshot wounds, and left dead at
the scene so that he appeared to have been killed while attacking the
station. His corpse was subsequently presented to the police and
press as proof of the attack.
-
The
minutes of the high command of the Italian government –
subsequently approved by Mussolini himself – admitted that
violence on the Greek-Albanian border was carried out by Italians
and falsely blamed on the Greeks, as an excuse for Italy’s 1940
invasion of Greece.
-
Nazi
general Franz Halder also testified at the Nuremberg trials that
Nazi leader Hermann Goering admitted to
setting fire to the German parliament building in 1933, and then
falsely blaming the communists for the arson.
-
Soviet
leader Nikita Khrushchev admitted in
writing that the Soviet Union’s Red Army shelled the Russian
village of Mainila in 1939 – while blaming the attack on Finland –
as a basis for launching the “Winter War” against Finland.
Russian president Boris Yeltsin agreed that
Russia had been the aggressor in the Winter War.
-
The
Russian Parliament, current Russian president Putin and former
Soviet leader Gorbachev all admit that
Soviet leader Joseph Stalin ordered his secret police to execute
22,000 Polish army officers and civilians in 1940, and then falsely
blamed it on the Nazis.
-
The
British government admits that
– between 1946 and 1948 – it bombed 5 ships carrying Jews who
were Holocaust survivors attempting to flee to safety in Palestine
right after World War II, set up a fake group called “Defenders of
Arab Palestine”, and then had the psuedo-group falsely claim
responsibility for the bombings (and see this, this and this).
-
Israel admits that
in 1954, an Israeli terrorist cell operating in Egypt planted bombs
in several buildings, including U.S. diplomatic facilities, then
left behind “evidence” implicating the Arabs as the culprits
(one of the bombs detonated prematurely, allowing the Egyptians to
identify the bombers, and several of the Israelis later confessed)
(and see this and this).
The
U.S. Army does not believe this is an isolated incident. For example,
the U.S. Army’s School of Advanced Military Studies said of
Mossad (Israel’s intelligence service):
“Ruthless
and cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make
it look like a Palestinian/Arab act.”
And
former Israeli Prime Moshe Minister admitted in
his diary:
I
have been meditating on the long chain of false
incidents and hostilities we have invented,
and on the many clashes we have provoked which cost us so much blood
….
-
The
CIA admits that
it hired Iranians in the 1950′s to pose as Communists and stage
bombings in Iran in order to turn the country against its
democratically-elected prime minister.
(10)
The Turkish Prime Minister admitted that
the Turkish government carried out the 1955 bombing on a Turkish
consulate in Greece – also damaging the nearby birthplace of the
founder of modern Turkey – and blamed it on Greece, for the purpose
of inciting and justifying anti-Greek violence.
The
Economist notes:
Starting
in the 1950s Turkey’s deep state sponsored killings, engineered
riots, colluded with drug traffickers, staged “false flag”
attacks and organised massacres of trade unionists. Thousands died in
the chaos it fomented.
-
The
British Prime Minister admitted to
his defense secretary that he and American president Dwight
Eisenhower approved a plan in 1957 to carry out attacks in Syria and
blame it on the Syrian government as a way to effect regime change.
-
The
former Italian Prime Minister, an Italian judge, and the former
head of Italian counterintelligence admit
that NATO,
with the help of the Pentagon and CIA, carried out terror bombings
in Italy and other European countries in the 1950s through the 1980s
and blamed the communists, in order to rally people’s support for
their governments in Europe in their fight against communism.
(13)
As one participant in this formerly-secret program stated: “You
had to attack civilians, people, women, children, innocent people,
unknown people far removed from any political game. The reason was
quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian
public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security” … so
that “a state of emergency could be declared, so people would
willingly trade part of their freedom for the security” (and
see this)
(Italy and other European countries subject to the terror campaign
had joined NATO before the bombings occurred). And watch this
BBC special.
They also allegedly carried out terror attacks in France,
Belgium, Denmark, Germany, Greece, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal,
the UK,
and other countries.
The
CIA also stressed to the head of the Italian program that Italy
needed to use the program to control internal uprisings.
False
flag attacks carried out pursuant to this program include – by way
of example only:
In
1960, American Senator George Smathers suggested that
the U.S. launch “a false attack made on Guantanamo Bay which would
give us the excuse of actually fomenting a fight which would then
give us the excuse to go in and [overthrow Castro]”.
-
Official
State Department documents show that, in 1961, the head of the Joint
Chiefs and other high-level officials discussed blowing
up a consulate in the Dominican Republic in order to justify an
invasion of that country. The plans were not carried out, but they
were all discussed as serious proposals.
(15)
As admitted by the U.S. government, recently declassified documents
show that in 1962, the American Joint Chiefs of Staff signed off on a
plan to blow
up AMERICAN airplanes (using
an elaborate plan involving the switching of airplanes), and also
to commit
terrorist acts on American soil,
and then to blame it on the Cubans in order to justify an invasion of
Cuba. See the following ABC
news report; the
official documents;
and watch this
interview with
the former Washington Investigative Producer for ABC’s World News
Tonight with Peter Jennings. This plan was
subsequently admitted again
in other declassified government documents.
Provocations
considered by the Joint Chiefs of Staff included:
Sink
ship near harbor entrance. Conduct funerals for mock-victims ….
***
3.
A “Remember the Maine” incident could be arranged in several
forms:
a.
We could blow up a US ship in Guantanamo Bay and blame Cuba.
b.
We could blow up a drone (unmanned) vessel anywhere in the Cuban
waters. We could arrange to cause such incident in the vicinity of
Havana or Santiago as a spectacular result of Cuban attack from the
air or sea, or both. The presence of Cuban planes or ships merely
investigating the intent of the vessel could be fairly compelling
evidence that the ship was taken under attack. The nearness to Havana
or Santiago would add credibility especially to those people that
might have heard the blast or have seen the fire. The US could follow
up with an air/sea rescue operation covered by US fighters to
“evacuate” remaining members of the non-existent crew. Casualty
lists in US newspapers would cause a helpful wave of national
indignation.
4.
We could develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area,
in other Florida cities and even in Washington.
The terror
campaign could be pointed at Cuban refugees seeking haven in the
United States. We could sink a boatload of Cubans enroute to Florida
(real or simulated). We could foster attempts on lives of Cuban
refugees in the United States even to the extent of wounding in
instances to be widely publicized. Exploding a few plastic bombs in
carefully chosen spots, the arrest of Cuban agents and the release of
prepared documents substantiating Cuban involvement also would be
helpful in projecting the idea of an irresponsible government.
***
6.
Use of MIG type aircraft by US pilots could provide additional
provocation. Harassment of civil air, attacks on surface shipping and
destruction of US military drone aircraft by MIG type planes would be
useful as complementary actions. An F-86 properly painted would
convince air passengers that they saw a Cuban MIG, especially if the
pilot of the transport were to announce such fact. The primary
drawback to this suggestion appears to be the security risk inherent
in obtaining or modifying an aircraft. However, reasonable copies of
the MIG could be produced from US resources in about three months.
***
8.
it is possible to create an incident which will
demonstrate
convincingly that a Cuban-aircraft has attacked and
shot down a chartered civil airliner en route from the United States
to Jamaica, Guatemala, Panama or Venezuela. The destination would be
chosen only to cause the flight plan route to cross Cuba, The
passengers could be a group of college students off on a holiday or
any grouping of persons with a common interest to support chartering
a non-scheduled flight.
a.
An aircraft at Eglin AFB would be painted and numbered as an exact
duplicate for a civil registered aircraft belonging to a CIA
proprietary organization in the Miami area. At a designated time the
duplicate would be substituted for the actual civil aircraft and
would be loaded with the selected passengers, all boarded under
carefully prepared aliases. The actual registered aircraft would be
converted to a drone.
b.
Take off times of the drone aircraft and the actual aircraft will be
scheduled to allow a rendezvous south of Florida. From the rendezvous
point the passenger-carrying aircraft will descend to minimum
altitude and go directly into an auxiliary field at Eglin AFB where
arrangements will have been made to evacuate the passengers and
return the aircraft to its original status. The drone aircraft
meanwhile will continue to fly the filed flight plan. When over Cuba
the drone will being transmitting on the inter-national distress
frequency a “MAY DAY” message stating he is under attack by Cuban
MIG aircraft. The transmission will be interrupted by destruction of
the aircraft which will be triggered by radio signal. This will allow
ICAO radio stations in the Western Hemisphere to “tell” the US
what has happened to the aircraft instead of the US trying to “sell”
the incident.
9.
It is possible to create an incident which will make it appear that
Communist Cuban MIGs have destroyed a USAF aircraft over
international waters in an unprovoked attack.
a.
Approximately 4 or 5 F-101 aircraft-will be dispatched in trail from
Homestead AFB, Florida, to the vicinity of Cuba. Their mission will
be to reverse course and simulate fakir aircraft for an air defense
exercise in southern Florida. These aircraft would conduct variations
of these flights at frequent intervals. Crews would be briefed to
remain at least 12 miles off the Cuban coast; however, they would be
required to carry live ammunition in the event that hostile actions
were taken by the Cuban MiGs.
b.
On One such flight, a pre-briefed pilot would fly tail-end Charley at
considerable interval between aircraft. While near the Cuban Island
this pilot would broadcast that he had been Jumped by MIGs and was
going down. No other calls would be made. The pilot would then fly
directly west at extremely low altitude and land at a secure base, an
Eglin auxiliary. The aircraft would be met by the proper people,
quickly stored and given a new tail number. The pilot who had
performed the mission under an alias, would resume his proper
identity and return to his normal place of business. The pilot and
aircraft would then have disappeared.
c.
At precisely the same time that the aircraft was presumably shot down
a submarine or small surface craft would disburse F-101 parts,
parachute, etc., at approximately 15 to 20 miles off the Cuban coast
and depart.
U.S.
government documents declassified in October 2017 admitted that
a very high-level 1962 meeting of U.S. government officials –
separate from the Joint Chiefs of Staff – also discussed:
The
possibility of U.S.
manufacture or acquisition of Soviet aircraft ….
There is a possibility that such aircraft could be used in a
deception operation designed to confuse enemy planes in the air, to
launch a surprise attack against enemy installations or in a
provocation operation in which Soviet aircraft would appear to attack
U.S. or friendly installations in order to provide an excuse for U.S.
intervention.
And see
this.
-
In
1963, the U.S. Department of Defense wrote a paper promoting attacks
on nations within the Organization of American States – such as
Trinidad-Tobago or Jamaica – and then falsely blaming them on
Cuba.
-
The
U.S. Department of Defense also suggested covertly
paying a person in the Castro government to attack the United
States: “The only area remaining for consideration then would be
to bribe one of Castro’s subordinate commanders to initiate an
attack on Guantanamo.”
-
A
U.S. Congressional committee admitted that
– as part of its “Cointelpro” campaign – the FBI had
used many provocateurs
in the 1950s through 1970s to carry out violent acts and falsely
blame them on political activists.
-
A top Turkish
general admitted that
Turkish forces burned down a mosque on Cyprus in the 1970s and
blamed it on their enemy. He explained:
“In Special War, certain acts
of sabotage are staged and blamed on the enemy to
increase public resistance. We did this on Cyprus; we even burnt
down a mosque.” In response to the surprised correspondent’s
incredulous look the general said, “I am giving an example”.
(20)
A declassified 1973
CIA document reveals a
program to train foreign police and troops on how to make booby
traps, pretending that they were training them on how
to investigate terrorist
acts:
The
Agency maintains liaison in varying degrees with foreign
police/security organizations through its field stations ….
[CIA
provides training sessions as follows:]
a.
Providing trainees with basic
knowledge in the uses of commercial and military demolitions and
incendiaries as
they may be applied in terrorism and industrial sabotage operations.
b.
Introducing the trainees to commercially
available materials and home laboratory techniques,
likely to he used in the manufacture of explosives and incendiaries
by terrorists or saboteurs.
c.
Familiarizing the trainees with the concept of target
analysis and operational planning that
a saboteur or terrorist must employ.
d.
Introducing the trainees to booby trapping devices and techniques
giving practical
experience with
both manufactured and improvised devices through
actual fabrication.
***
The
program provides the trainees with ample
opportunity to develop basic familiarity and use proficiently through
handling, preparing and applying the various explosive charges,
incendiary agents, terrorist devices and sabotage techniques.
-
The
German government admitted (and see
this)
that, in 1978, the German secret service detonated a bomb in the
outer wall of a prison and planted “escape tools” on a prisoner
– a member of the Red Army Faction – which the secret service
wished to frame the bombing on.
-
A
Mossad agent admits that,
in 1984, Mossad planted a radio transmitter in Gaddaffi’s compound
in Tripoli, Libya which broadcast fake terrorist transmissions
recorded by Mossad, in order to frame Gaddaffi as a terrorist
supporter. Ronald Reagan bombed Libya immediately thereafter.
-
The
South African Truth and Reconciliation Council found that,
in 1989, the Civil Cooperation Bureau (a covert branch of the South
African Defense Force) approached an explosives expert and asked him
“to participate in an operation aimed at discrediting the ANC [the
African National Congress] by bombing the police vehicle of the
investigating officer into the murder incident”, thus framing the
ANC for the bombing.
-
An
Algerian diplomat and several officers in the Algerian
army admit that,
in the 1990s, the Algerian army frequently massacred Algerian
civilians and then blamed Islamic militants for the killings (and
see this
video;
and see Agence France-Presse, 9/27/2002, French
Court Dismisses Algerian Defamation Suit Against Author).
-
In
1993, a bomb in Northern Ireland killed 9 civilians. Official
documents from the Royal Ulster Constabulary (i.e. the British
government) show that
the mastermind of the bombing was a British agent, and that the
bombing was designed to inflame sectarian tensions. And
see this and this.
-
The
United States Army’s 1994 publication Special
Forces Foreign Internal Defense Tactics Techniques and Procedures
for Special Forces –
updated in 2004 – recommends employing
terrorists and using false flag operations to destabilize leftist
regimes in Latin America. False flag terrorist attacks were carried
out in Latin America and other regions as part of the CIA’s “Dirty
Wars“.
And see
this.
(27)
Similarly, a CIA “psychological operations” manual prepared by a
CIA contractor for the Nicaraguan Contra rebels noted the
value of assassinating someone on your own side to create a “martyr”
for the cause. The manual was authenticated by
the U.S. government. The manual received so much publicity from
Associated Press, Washington Post and other news coverage that –
during the 1984 presidential debate – President Reagan
was confronted with
the following question on national television:
At
this moment, we are confronted with the extraordinary story of a CIA
guerrilla manual for the anti-Sandinista contras whom we are backing,
which advocates not only assassinations of Sandinistas but the hiring
of criminals to assassinate the guerrillas we are supporting in order
to create martyrs.
-
A
Rwandan government inquiry admitted that
the 1994 shootdown and murder of the Rwandan president, who was from
the Hutu tribe
– a murder blamed by the Hutus on the rival Tutsi tribe,
and which led to the massacre of more than 800,000 Tutsis by Hutus –
was committed by Hutu soldiers
and falsely blamed on the Tutis.
-
An
Indonesian government fact-finding team investigated violent riots
which occurred in 1998, and determined that “elements
of the military had been involved in the riots, some of which were
deliberately provoked”.
-
Senior
Russian Senior military and intelligence officers admit that
the KGB blew up Russian apartment buildings in 1999 and falsely
blamed it on Chechens, in order to justify an invasion of Chechnya
(and see this
report and this
discussion).
-
As
reported by the New
York Times, BBC and Associated
Press,
Macedonian officials admit that in 2001, the government murdered 7
innocent immigrants in cold blood and pretended that they were Al
Qaeda soldiers attempting to assassinate Macedonian police, in order
to join the “war on terror”. They lured foreign migrants into
the country, executed them in a staged gun battle, and then claimed
they were a unit backed by Al Qaeda intent on attacking Western
embassies”. Specifically, Macedonian authorities had lured the
immigrants into the country, and then – after killing them –
posed the victims with planted evidence – “bags of uniforms and
semiautomatic weapons at their side” – to show Western
diplomats.
-
At
the July 2001 G8 Summit in Genoa, Italy, black-clad thugs
were videotaped getting
out of police cars, and were seen by
an Italian MP carrying “iron bars inside the police station”.
Subsequently, senior police officials in Genoa admitted that
police planted two Molotov cocktails and faked the stabbing of a
police officer at the G8 Summit, in order to justify a violent
crackdown against
protesters.
-
The
U.S. falsely
blamed Iraq for
playing a role in the 9/11 attacks – as shown by a memo
from the defense secretary –
as one of the main
justifications for
launching the Iraq war. Even
after the 9/11 Commission admitted that
there was no connection, Dick Cheney said that
the evidence is “overwhelming” that al Qaeda had a relationship
with Saddam Hussein’s regime, that Cheney “probably” had
information unavailable to the Commission, and that the media was
not ‘doing their homework’ in reporting such ties. Top U.S.
government officials now admit that
the Iraq war was really launched for oil … not 9/11 or weapons of
mass destruction.
Despite
previous “lone wolf” claims, many U.S. government officials
now say that
9/11 was state-sponsored terror; but Iraq was not the
state which backed the hijackers. (Many U.S. officials
have allegedthat
9/11 was a false flag operation by rogue elements of the U.S.
government; but such a claim is beyond the scope of this discussion.
The key point is that the U.S. falsely blamed it on Iraq, when
it knew Iraq
had nothing to do with it.).
(Additionally,
the same
judge who has shielded the Saudis for
any liability for funding 9/11 has awarded a default judgment against
Iran for $10.5
billion for carrying out 9/11 …
even though no one seriously believes that Iran had any part in
9/11.)
-
Although
the FBI now admits that the 2001 anthrax attacks were carried out by
one or more U.S. government scientists, a senior FBI official says
that the FBI was actually told to
blame the Anthrax attacks on Al Qaeda by White House
officials (remember
what the anthrax letters looked
like).
Government officials also confirm that the white House tried
to link the anthrax to Iraq as
a justification for regime change in that country. And see
this.
-
According
to the Washington
Post,
Indonesian police admit that the Indonesian military killed American
teachers in Papua in 2002 and blamed the murders on a Papuan
separatist group in order to get that group listed as a terrorist
organization.
-
The
well-respected former Indonesian president also admits that
the government probably had a role in the Bali bombings.
-
Police
outside of a 2003 European Union summit in Greece were
filmed planting
Molotov cocktails on a peaceful protester.
(38)
In 2003, the U.S. Secretary of Defense admitted that
interrogators were authorized to use the following method:
False
Flag: Convincing the detainee that individuals from a country other
than the United States are interrogating him.
While
not a traditional false flag attack,
this deception could lead to former detainees – many
of whom were tortured –
attacking the country falsely blamed for the interrogation and
torture.
-
Former
Department of Justice lawyer John Yoo suggested in
2005 that the US should go on the offensive against al-Qaeda, having
“our intelligence agencies create a false
terrorist organization.
It could have its own websites, recruitment centers, training camps,
and fundraising operations. It could launch fake
terrorist operations and
claim credit for real terrorist strikes, helping to sow confusion
within al-Qaeda’s ranks, causing operatives to doubt others’
identities and to question the validity of communications.”
-
Similarly,
in 2005, Professor John Arquilla of the Naval Postgraduate School –
a renowned US defense analyst credited with developing the concept
of ‘netwar’ – called
for western
intelligence services to create
new “pseudo gang” terrorist groups,
as a way of undermining “real” terror networks. According to
Pulitzer-Prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh, Arquilla’s
‘pseudo-gang’ strategy was, Hersh reported, already
being implemented by
the Pentagon:
“Under
Rumsfeld’s new approach, I was told, US military operatives would
be permitted to pose abroad as corrupt foreign businessmen seeking
to buy contraband items that could be used in nuclear-weapons
systems. In some cases, according to the Pentagon advisers, local
citizens could be recruited and asked to join up with guerrillas or
terrorists…
The
new rules will enable the Special Forces community to set up what it
calls ‘action teams’ in the target countries overseas which can
be used to find and eliminate terrorist organizations. ‘Do
you remember the right-wing execution squads in El Salvador?’ the
former high-level intelligence official asked me, referring to the
military-led gangs that committed atrocities in the early
nineteen-eighties. ‘We founded them and we financed them,’ he
said. ‘The objective now is to recruit locals in any area we want.
And we aren’t going to tell Congress about it.’ A former military
officer, who has knowledge of the Pentagon’s commando capabilities,
said, ‘We’re going to be riding with the bad boys.’”
(41)
United Press International reported in
June 2005:
U.S.
intelligence officers are reporting that some of the insurgents in
Iraq are using recent-model Beretta 92 pistols, but the pistols seem
to have had their serial numbers erased. The numbers do not appear to
have been physically removed; the pistols seem to have come off a
production line without any serial numbers. Analysts suggest the lack
of serial numbers indicates that the weapons were intended for
intelligence operations or terrorist cells with substantial
government backing. Analysts speculate that these guns are probably
from either Mossad or the CIA. Analysts speculate that agent
provocateurs may be using the untraceable weapons even as U.S.
authorities use insurgent attacks against civilians as evidence of
the illegitimacy of the resistance.
-
In
2005, British
soldiers dressed
as Arabs were caught by Iraqi police after a shootout against the
police. The British soldiers shot two Iraqi policemen, killing
one.
The soldiers apparently possessed
explosives,
and were accused of
attempting to set
off bombs.
While none of the soldiers admitted that they were carrying out
attacks, British soldiers and a column of 10 British tanks stormed
the jail they were held in, broke
down a wall of the jail, and busted them out.
The extreme measures used to free the soldiers – rather than have
them face questions and potentially stand trial – could be
considered an admission.
-
Undercover
Israeli soldiers admitted in
2005 to throwing stones at other Israeli soldiers so they could
blame it on Palestinians, as an excuse to crack down on peaceful
protests by the Palestinians.
-
Quebec
police admitted that,
in 2007, thugs carrying rocks to a peaceful protest were actually
undercover Quebec police officers (and see
this).
-
A
2008 US Army special operations field manual recommends that
the U.S. military use surrogate non-state groups such as
“paramilitary forces, individuals, businesses, foreign political
organizations, resistant or insurgent organizations,
expatriates, transnational
terrorism adversaries, disillusioned transnational terrorism
members,
black marketers, and other social or political ‘undesirables.’”
The manual specifically acknowledged that U.S. special operations
can involve both counterterrorism and “Terrorism” (as well as
“transnational criminal activities, including narco-trafficking,
illicit arms-dealing, and illegal financial transactions.”)
(46)
The former Italian Prime
Minister, President, and head of Secret Services (Francesco
Cossiga) advised the
2008 minister in charge of the police, on how to deal with protests
from teachers and students:
He
should do what I did when I was Minister of the Interior … infiltrate
the movement with agents provocateurs inclined
to do anything …. And after that, with the strength of the gained
population consent, … beat
them for blood and beat for blood also
those teachers that incite them. Especially the teachers. Not the
elderly, of course, but the girl teachers yes.
-
An
undercover officer admitted that
he infiltrated environmental, leftwing and anti-fascist groups in 22
countries. Germany’s federal police chief admitted that
– while the undercover officer worked for the German police – he
acted illegally during a G8 protest in Germany in 2007 and committed
arson by setting fire during a subsequent demonstration in Berlin.
The undercover officer spent many years living
with violent
“Black Bloc” anarchists.
-
Denver
police admitted that
uniformed officers deployed in 2008 to an area where alleged
“anarchists” had planned to wreak havoc outside the Democratic
National Convention ended up getting into a melee with two
undercover policemen. The uniformed officers didn’t know the
undercover officers were cops.
-
At
the G20 protests in London in 2009, a British member of
parliament saw plain
clothes police officers attempting to incite the crowd to violence.
-
The
oversight agency for the Royal Canadian Mounted Police admitted that
– at the G20 protests in Toronto in 2010 – undercover police
officers were arrested with a group of protesters. Videos and photos
(see this and this,
for example) show that violent protesters wore very similar boots
and other gear as the police, and carried police batons. The Globe
and Mail reports that
the undercover officers planned the targets for violent attack, and
the police failed to stop the attacks.
-
Egyptian
politicians admitted (and see
this)
that government employees looted priceless museum artifacts 2011 to
try to discredit the protesters.
-
Austin
police admit that
3 officers infiltrated the Occupy protests in that city.
Prosecutors admit that
one of the undercover officers purchased and constructed illegal
“lock boxes” which ended up getting many protesters arrested.
-
In
2011, a Colombian colonel admitted that
he and his soldiers had lured 57 innocent civilians and killed them
– after dressing many of them in uniforms – as part of a scheme
to claim that Columbia was eradicating left-wing terrorists. And see
this.
-
Rioters
who discredited the peaceful protests against the swearing in of the
Mexican president in 2012 admitted that
they were paid 300 pesos each to destroy everything in their path.
According to Wikipedia, photos also show the
vandals waiting in groups behind police lines prior to the violence.
-
On
November 20, 2014, Mexican agent provocateurs were transported by
army vehicles to participate in the 2014 Iguala mass kidnapping
protests, as was shown by
videos and pictures distributed via social networks.
-
The
highly-respected writer for the Telegraph Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
says that the head of Saudi intelligence – Prince Bandar –
recently admitted that
the Saudi government controls “Chechen” terrorists.
(57) Two
members of the Turkish parliament, high-level
American sources and
others admitted that the Turkish government – a NATO country –
carried out the chemical weapons attacks in Syria and falsely blamed
them on the Syrian government; and high-ranking Turkish
government admitted on
tape plans to carry out attacks and blame it on the Syrian
government.
-
The
former Director of the NSA and other American government
officials admit said
that the U.S. is a huge supporter of terrorism. Jimmy Carter’s
National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski admitted on
CNN that the U.S. organized
and supported Bin Laden and the other originators of “Al Qaeda”
in the 1970s to
fight the Soviets. The U.S. and its allies have been supporting Al
Qaeda and other Islamic terrorist groups for many decades, and
providing them arms, money and logistical support
in Libya, Syria, Mali, Bosnia, Chechnya, Iran,
and many
other countries.
U.S. allies are also directly responsible
for creating and supplying ISIS.
It’s
gotten so ridiculous that a U.S. Senator has introduced a “Stop
Arming Terrorists Act”,
and U.S. Congresswoman – who introduced a similar bill in the House
– says:
“For years, the U.S. government has been supporting armed militant
groups working directly with and often under the command of terrorist
groups like ISIS and al-Qaeda in their fight to overthrow the Syrian
government.”
-
Government
officials on both
sides of
the conflict, as well as the snipers who actually pulled the
trigger, all admit that
shots were fired on both sides
– killing both government officials and anti-government protesters
in Ukraine – to create maximum chaos and destabilization.
-
Speaking
of snipers, in a secret recording, Venezuelan generals admit that
they will deploy snipers to shoot protesters, but keep the marksmen
well-hidden from demonstrator and the reporters covering the events
so others would be blamed for the deaths.
-
Burmese
government officials admitted that
Burma (renamed Myanmar) used false flag attacks against Muslim and
Buddhist groups within the country to stir up hatred between the two
groups, to prevent democracy from spreading.
-
Israeli
police were again filmed in
2015 dressing up as Arabs and throwing stones, then turning over
Palestinian protesters to Israeli soldiers.
-
Britain’s
spy agency has admitted (and see
this)
that it carries out “digital false flag” attacks on
targets, framing
people by
writing offensive or unlawful material … and blaming it on the
target.
-
The
CIA has admitted that
it uses viruses and malware from Russia and other countries to carry
out cyberattacks and blame other countries.
-
U.S.
soldiers have admitted that
if they kill innocent Iraqis and Afghanis, they then “drop”
automatic weapons near their body so they can pretend they
were militants.
-
German
prosecutors admit that
a German soldier disguised himself as a Syrian refugee and planned
to shoot people so that the attack would be blamed on asylum
seekers.
(67)
Police frame innocent people for crimes they didn’t commit. The
practice is so well-known that the New York Times noted in
1981:
In
police jargon, a throwdown is a weapon planted on a victim.
Newsweek reported in
1999:
Perez,
himself a former [Los Angeles Police Department] cop, was caught
stealing eight pounds of cocaine from police evidence lockers. After
pleading guilty in September, he bargained for a lighter sentence by
telling an appalling story of attempted murder and
a “throwdown”–police
slang for a weapon planted by cops to make a shooting legally
justifiable.
Perez said he and his partner, Officer Nino Durden, shot an unarmed
18th Street Gang member named Javier Ovando, then planted
a semiautomatic rifle on the unconscious suspect and claimed that
Ovando had tried to shoot themduring
a stakeout.
Wikipedia notes:
As
part of his plea bargain, Pérez implicated scores of officers from
the Rampart Division’s anti-gang unit, describing routinely beating
gang members, planting
evidence on suspects, falsifying reports and covering up unprovoked
shootings.
(As
a side note – and while not technically false flag attacks –
police have been busted framing
innocent people in many other ways,
as well.)
(68)
A former U.S. intelligence officer recently alleged:
Most
terrorists are false flag terrorists or are created by our own
security services.
He
has himself admitted to
carrying out a false flag attack.
-
The
head and special agent in charge of the FBI’s Los Angeles
office said that
most terror attacks are committed by the CIA and FBI as false flags.
(70)
The Director of
Analytics at the interagency Global Engagement Center housed at the
U.S. Department of State, also an adjunct professor at George Mason
University, where he teaches the graduate course National Security
Challenges in the Department of Information Sciences and Technology,
a former branch chief in the CIA’s Counterterrorism Center, and an
intelligence advisor to the Secretary of Homeland Security (J.D.
Maddox) notes:
Provocation
is one of the most basic, but confounding, aspects of
warfare. Despite
its sometimes obvious use, it has succeeded consistently against
audiences around the world, for millennia, to compel war.
A well-constructed provocation narrative mutes even the most vocal
opposition.
***
The
culmination of a strategic provocation operation invariably reflects
a narrative of victimhood: we
are the victims of the enemy’s unforgivable atrocities.
***
In
the case of strategic provocation the
deaths of an aggressor’s own personnel are a core tactic of the
provocation.
***
The
persistent use of strategic provocation over centuries – and its
apparent importance to war planners – begs the question of its
likely use by the US and other states in the near term.
(71)
Leaders throughout history have acknowledged the “benefits” of of
false flags to justify their political agenda:
“Terrorism
is the best political weapon for
nothing drives people harder than a fear of sudden death”.
– Adolph
Hitler
“Why
of course the people don’t want war … But after all it is the
leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it is always a
simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy, or
a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship
… Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the
bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell
them they are being attacked,
and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the
country to danger. It works the same in any country.”
– Hermann
Goering, Nazi leader.
“The
easiest way to gain control of a population is to carry
out acts
of terror. [The public] will clamor for such laws if their personal
security is threatened”.
– Josef Stalin
Postscript
1: It is not just “modern” nations which have launched false flag
attacks. For example, a Native American from one tribe (Pomunkey)
murdered a white Englishwoman living in Virginia in 1697 and then
falsely blamed it on second tribe
(Piscataway). But he later admitted in
court that he was not really Piscataway, and that he had been paid by
a provocateur from a third tribe
(Iroquois) to kill the woman as a way to start a war between the
English and the Piscataway, thus protecting the profitable Iroquois
monopoly in trade with the English.
Postscript
2: On multiple occasions, atrocities or warmongering are falsely
blamed on the enemy as a justification for war … when no
such event ever occurred. This is more like a “fake flag”
than a “false flag”, as no actual terrorism occurred.
For
example:
-
The
NSA admits that
it lied about
what really happened in the Gulf
of Tonkin incident in
1964 … manipulating data to make it look like North Vietnamese
boats fired on a U.S. ship so as to create a false justification for
the Vietnam war
-
One
of the central lies used to justify the 1991 Gulf War against Iraq
after Iraq invaded Kuwait was the false
statement by
a young Kuwaiti girl that Iraqis
murdered Kuwaiti babies in
hospitals. Her statement was arranged by a Congressman who knew that
she was actually the daughter of the Kuwaiti Ambassador to the U.S.
– who was desperately trying to lobby the U.S. to enter the war –
but the Congressman hid
that fact from the public and from Congress
-
nother
central lie used to justify the Gulf War was the statement that a
quarter of a million Iraqi troops were massed on the border with
Saudi Arabia (see
also this
article)
-
Pulitzer
prize-winning journalist Ron Suskind reported that
the White House ordered the CIA to forge and backdate a document
falsely linking Iraq with Muslim terrorists and 9/11 … and that
the CIA complied with those instructions and in fact created the
forgery, which was then used to justify war against Iraq. And
see this and this
-
Time
magazine points
out that
the claim by President Bush that Iraq was attempting to buy “yellow
cake” Uranium from Niger:
had
been checked out — and debunked — by U.S. intelligence a year
before the President repeated it.
==========================================
* Op WashingtonBlog wordt ook verwezen naar een ander artikel op Newsweek:
Last
month, Newsweek ran an
article headlined:
U.S. GOVERNMENT PLANNED FALSE FLAG ATTACKS TO START WAR WITH SOVIET UNION, JFK DOCUMENTS SHOW Zie wat deze link betreft ook: ‘Newsweek erkent ‘false flag’ operatie van de VS tegen de Sovjet Unie……‘
————————————
Voorts zie ‘Onderbroekbom (25 december 2009) een enorm onzin verhaal, weer zijn we voorgelogen…….‘
‘WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’‘
‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..‘
‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..‘
‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..‘
‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!‘
‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld‘
‘Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……‘
‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!‘
‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..‘
‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint‘
‘Foreign Ministry: Some Western officials are complicit in the crimes of terrorists against civilians in Damascus and its countryside‘
‘SOHR, het orgaan dat door de reguliere media wordt aangehaald i.z. Syrië, is gevestigd in Coventry‘
