Oorlogsmisdadiger Hillary Clinton* heeft een boek geschreven, het kan u bijna niet zijn ontgaan. In dit boek durft deze leugenaar de schuld voor het verlies van de VS-presidentsverkiezingen bij anderen te leggen, terwijl ze van meet af aan een heel smerige campagne leidde tegen haar mede democratische kandidaat Sanders………
Een lid van haar campagneteam, Seth Rich was het niet eens met deze smerige campagne en hij lekte documenten naar Wikileaks, die aangaven dat Clinton de boel had belogen en bedrogen, dus niet de Russen zoals de reguliere media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici tot op de dag van vandaag volhouden……. Deze Rich werd na het lekken van de documenten ‘toevallig’ vermoord, volgens de politie een roofmoord, hoewel er niets van Rich werd gestolen, zelfs zichtbare sieraden niet……. Je zal begrijpen dat deze moord Clinton wel heel goed uitkwam…….
De reguliere (massa-) media staan voor het overgrote deel nog steeds achter Clinton, ondanks al haar bewezen leugens….. Voorts zou Clinton een kampioen vrouwenemancipatie zijn, dit terwijl het haar geen reet interesseert, dat ze een groot aantal vrouwen in diepe ellende heeft gedompeld en zelfs een groot aantal vrouwen heeft vermoord, middels het vermaledijde en grootschalige terroristische VS buitenlandbeleid…….
Zoals je waarschijnlijk wel weet, gebeurde dit in de illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië…… Wat betreft die laatste: van meet af aan, heeft Clinton in haar functie ingezet op het onrust stoken in Syrië, daar Assad moest verdwijnen (een VS plan dat in 2006 weer uit de koelkast werd gehaald). Waar nog aan toegevoegd moet worden, dat Clinton één op één verantwoordelijk was voor de illegale oorlog tegen Libië, een oorlog die aan naar schatting 40.000 mensen het leven heeft gekost (moorden) en waarin de Libische leider Khadaffi gruwelijk werd vermoord…….
Libie is nu één grote chaos en alle ellende die bijvoorbeeld de vluchtelingen uit conflictgebieden in Afrika overkomt (mensen die naar Europa willen vluchten), zoals verkrachting, marteling en slavernij zijn te danken aan het ingrijpen van Clinton…….. Onder Khadaffi was Libië het rijkste land van Afrika en waren huisvesting, energie, gezondheidszorg, scholing en zelfs studie (ook voor vrouwen) in het buitenland, zo goed als gratis…….
Daarnaast was er nog de coup tegen de democratisch gekozen Hondurese regering in 2009, een coup die tot een berg geweld leidde en waarvoor Clinton één van de hoofdverantwoordelijken is………
Mensen ik snap niet waar Clinton het gore lef vandaan haalt, om zichzelf als slachtoffer uit te roepen, ongelofelijk, ongeloofwaardig, onverdraaglijk en ronduit schunnig!!
Mensen lees het uitstekende artikel van John Pilger, die nog meer zaken uit de doeken doet:
Julian
Assange, Hillary Clinton and the War on Truth
October
21, 2017 at 9:03 am
Written
by John
Pilger
Australia’s
public broadcasting network gave Hillary Clinton an open mic to
defame WikiLeaks’ Julian Assange as “a tool of Russian
intelligence” without giving him a chance to respond.
(CN) — On
Oct. 16, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation aired an interview
with Hillary Clinton: one of many to promote her score-settling book
about why she was not elected President of the United States.
Wading
through the Clinton book, What
Happened, is
an unpleasant experience, like a stomach upset. Smears and tears.
Threats and enemies. “They” (voters) were brainwashed and herded
against her by the odious Donald Trump in cahoots with sinister Slavs
sent from the great darkness known as Russia, assisted by an
Australian “nihilist,” Julian Assange.
In The New
York Times, there
was a striking photograph of a female reporter consoling Clinton,
having just interviewed her. The lost leader was, above all,
“absolutely a feminist.” The thousands of women’s lives this
“feminist” destroyed while in government — Libya, Syria,
Honduras — were of no interest.
In New
York magazine,
Rebecca Trainster wrote that Clinton was finally “expressing some
righteous anger.” It was even hard for her to smile: “so hard
that the muscles in her face ache.” Surely, she concluded, “if we
allowed women’s resentments the same bearing we allow men’s
grudges, America would be forced to reckon with the fact that all
these angry women might just have a point.”
Drivel
such as this, trivializing women’s struggles, marks the media
hagiographies of Hillary Clinton. Her political extremism and
warmongering are of no consequence. Her problem, wrote Trainster, was
a “damaging infatuation with the email story.” The truth, in
other words.
The
leaked emails of Clinton’s campaign manager, John Podesta, revealed
a direct connection between Clinton and the foundation and funding of
organized jihadism in the Middle East and Islamic State (known as
ISIS, ISIL or Daesh). The ultimate source of most Islamic terrorism,
Saudi Arabia, was central to her career.
One
email, in 2014, sent by Clinton to Podesta soon after she stepped
down as U.S. Secretary of State, discloses that Islamic State is
funded by the governments of Saudi Arabia and Qatar. Clinton accepted
huge donations from both governments for the Clinton Foundation.
As
Secretary of State, she approved the world’s biggest ever arms sale
to her benefactors in Saudi Arabia, worth more than $80 billion.
Thanks to her, U.S. arms sales to the world – for use in stricken
countries like Yemen – doubled.
This
was revealed by WikiLeaks and published by The New
York Times. No
one doubts the emails are authentic. The subsequent campaign to smear
WikiLeaks and its editor-in-chief, Julian Assange, as “agents of
Russia,” has grown into a spectacular fantasy known as
“Russiagate.” The “plot” is said to have been signed off on
by Vladimir Putin himself. There is not a shred of public evidence.
Smear
and Omission
The
ABC Australia interview with Clinton is an outstanding example of
smear and censorship by omission. I would say it is a model.
“No
one,” the interviewer, Sarah Ferguson, says to Clinton, “could
fail to be moved by the pain on your face at that moment [of the
inauguration of Trump] … Do you remember how visceral it was for
you?”
Having
established Clinton’s visceral suffering, Ferguson asks about
“Russia’s role.”
CLINTON:
I think Russia affected the perceptions and views of millions of
voters, we now know. I think that their intention coming from the
very top with Putin was to hurt me and to help Trump.
FERGUSON:
How much of that was a personal vendetta by Vladimir Putin against
you?
CLINTON:
… I mean he wants to destabilize democracy. He wants to undermine
America, he wants to go after the Atlantic Alliance and we consider
Australia kind of a … an extension of that …
(The
opposite is true. It is a combination of Western armies massing on
Russia’s border for the first time since the Russian Revolution 100
years ago.)
FERGUSON:
How much damage did [Julian Assange] do personally to you?
CLINTON:
Well, I had a lot of history with him because I was Secretary of
State when, ah, WikiLeaks published a lot of very sensitive, ah,
information from our State Department and our Defense Department.
(What
Clinton fails to say – and her interviewer fails to remind her –
is that in 2010, WikiLeaks revealed that Secretary of State Hillary
Clinton had ordered a secret intelligence campaign targeted at the
United Nations leadership, including the Secretary General, Ban
Ki-Moon and the permanent Security Council representatives from
China, Russia, France and the U.K. A classified directive, signed by
Clinton, was issued to U.S. diplomats in July 2009, demanding
forensic technical details about the communications systems used by
top U.N. officials, including passwords and personal encryption keys
used in private and commercial networks. This was known as Cablegate.
It was lawless spying.)
CLINTON:
He [Assange] is very clearly a tool of Russian intelligence. And, ah,
he has done their bidding.
(Clinton
offered no evidence to back up this serious accusation, nor did
Ferguson challenge her.)
CLINTON:
You don’t see damaging negative information coming out about the
Kremlin on WikiLeaks. You didn’t see any of that published.
(This
was false. WikiLeaks has published a massive number of documents on
Russia – more than 800,000, most of them critical, many of them
used in books and as evidence in court cases.)
A
‘Nihilistic Opportunist’
CLINTON:
So I think Assange has become a kind of nihilistic opportunist who
does the bidding of a dictator.
FERGUSON: Lots
of people, including in Australia, think that Assange is a martyr for
free speech and freedom of information. How would you describe him?
Well, you’ve just described him as a nihilist.
CLINTON:
Yeah, well, and a tool. I mean he’s a tool of Russian intelligence.
And if he’s such, ah, you know, martyr of free speech, why doesn’t
WikiLeaks ever publish anything coming out of Russia?
(Again,
Ferguson said nothing to challenge this or correct her.)
CLINTON:
There was a concerted operation between WikiLeaks and Russia and most
likely people in the United States to weaponize that information, to
make up stories … to help Trump.
FERGUSON:
Now, along with some of those outlandish stories, there was
information that was revealed about the Clinton Foundation that at
least in some of the voters’ minds seemed to associate you ….
CLINTON:
Yeah, but it was false!
FERGUSON:
… with the peddling of information …
CLINTON:
It was false! It was totally false! …..
FERGUSON:
Do you understand how difficult it was for some voters to understand
the amounts of money that the [Clinton] Foundation is raising, the
confusion with the consultancy that was also raising money, getting
gifts and travel and so on for Bill Clinton that even Chelsea had
some issues with? …
CLINTON:
Well you know, I’m sorry, Sarah, I mean I, I know the facts….
Generational
‘Icon’
The
ABC interviewer lauded Clinton as “the icon of your generation.”
She asked her nothing about the enormous sums she creamed off from
Wall Street, such as the $675,000 for speaking to Goldman Sachs, one
of the banks at the center of the 2008 crash. Clinton’s greed
deeply upset the kind of voters she abused as “deplorables.”
Clearly
looking for a cheap headline in the Australian press, Ferguson asked
her if Trump was “a clear and present danger to Australia” and
got her predictable response.
This
high-profile journalist made no mention of Clinton’s own “clear
and present danger” to the people of Iran whom she once threatened
to “obliterate totally,” and the 40,000 Libyans who died in the
attack on Libya in 2011 that Clinton orchestrated. Flushed with
excitement, the Secretary of State rejoiced at the gruesome murder of
the Libyan leader, Colonel Gaddafi.
“Libya
was Hillary Clinton’s war,” Julian Assange said in a filmed
interview with me last year. “Barack Obama initially opposed it.
Who was the person championing it? Hillary Clinton. That’s
documented throughout her emails … there’s more than 1,700 emails
out of the 33,000 Hillary Clinton emails that we’ve published, just
about Libya. It’s not that Libya has cheap oil. She perceived the
removal of Gaddafi and the overthrow of the Libyan state —
something that she would use in her run-up to the general election
for President.
“So
in late 2011 there is an internal document called the Libya Tick Tock
that was produced for Hillary Clinton, and it’s the chronological
description of how she was the central figure in the destruction of
the Libyan state, which resulted in around 40,000 deaths within
Libya; jihadists moved in, ISIS moved in, leading to the European
refugee and migrant crisis.
“Not
only did you have people fleeing Libya, people fleeing Syria, the
destabilization of other African countries as a result of arms flows,
but the Libyan state itself was no longer able to control the
movement of people through it.”
This
– not Clinton’s “visceral” pain in losing to Trump nor the
rest of the self-serving scuttlebutt in her ABC interview – was the
story. Clinton shared responsibility for massively de-stabilizing the
Middle East, which led to the death, suffering and flight of
thousands of women, men and children.
Ferguson
raised not a word of it. Clinton repeatedly defamed Assange, who was
neither defended nor offered a right of reply on his own country’s
state broadcaster.
In
a tweet from London, Assange cited the ABC’s own Code of Practice,
which states: “Where allegations are made about a person or
organisation, make reasonable efforts in the circumstances to provide
a fair opportunity to respond.”
‘Putin’s
Bitch’
Following
the ABC broadcast, Ferguson’s executive producer, Sally Neighbour,
re-tweeted the following: “Assange is Putin’s bitch. We all know
it!”
The
slander, since deleted, was even used as a link to the ABC interview
captioned ‘Assange is Putins (sic) b****. We all know it!’
In
the years I have known Julian Assange, I have watched a vituperative
personal campaign try to stop him and WikiLeaks. It has been a
frontal assault on whistleblowing, on free speech and free
journalism, all of which are now under sustained attack from
governments and corporate Internet controllers.
The
first serious attacks on Assange came from the Guardian, which, like
a spurned lover, turned on its besieged former source, having hugely
profited from WikiLeaks’ disclosures. With not a penny going to
Assange or WikiLeaks, a Guardian book led to a lucrative Hollywood
movie deal. Assange was portrayed as “callous” and a “damaged
personality.”
It
was as if a rampant jealousy could not accept that his remarkable
achievements stood in marked contrast to that of his detractors in
the “mainstream” media. It is like watching the guardians of the
status quo, regardless of age, struggling to silence real dissent and
prevent the emergence of the new and hopeful.
Today,
Assange remains a political refugee from the war-making dark state of
which Donald Trump is a caricature and Hillary Clinton the
embodiment. His resilience and courage are astonishing. Unlike him,
his tormentors are cowards.
John
Pilger is an Australian-British journalist based in London. Pilger’s
Web site is: www.johnpilger.com.
His new film, “The Coming War on China,” is available in the U.S.
from www.bullfrogfilms.com
By John
Pilger /
Republished with permission / ConsortiumNews.com / Report
a typo
=========================================================
* Hillary Clinton is o.a. verantwoordelijk voor de illegale oorlog tegen Libië, Syrië en in feite verantwoordelijk voor de oorlog tegen de bevolking in Oost-Oekraïne, daarnaast is ze mede verantwoordelijk voor de in 2009 gepleegde coup tegen de democratisch gekozen regering van Honduras……. Zie wat dat betreft o.a.. ‘Hillary Clinton, huurmoordenaar voor de banken: de ware reden achter de illegale oorlog tegen Libië…..‘
Zie ook: ‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!‘
en: ‘CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..‘
en: ‘‘Russische bemoeienis’ met de Nederlandse verkiezingen….. Waaruit blijkt nu die manipulatie, gezien de verkiezingsuitslag?‘
en: ‘CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7‘
en: ‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)
en: ‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia‘
en: ‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd‘
en: ‘‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!‘
en: ‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!‘
en: ‘VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!‘
en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump‘
en: ‘Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..‘
en: ‘Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election‘
en: ‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information‘
en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election‘
en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media‘
en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘
en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence‘
en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘
en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘
en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..‘
en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….‘
en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte‘
en: ‘De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………‘
en: ‘WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’‘
en: ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….‘
en: ‘Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat‘
!["Neither of [the leaks] came from the Russians," said Craig Murray, former British ambassador to Uzbekistan and a close associate of Wikileaks founder Julian Assange. "The source had legal access to the information. The documents came from inside leaks, not hacks." (Associated Press)](https://twt-thumbs.washtimes.com/media/image/2016/12/14/CraigMurray_c0-194-1234-913_s885x516.jpg?921e5bd9fce9f40a466ff126275f6d943061adc2)