Tijdens
de illegale oorlog tegen Syrië zijn meerdere pogingen gedaan het
Syrische bewind te beschuldigen van gifgasaanvallen tegen de eigen bevolking en ondanks dat deze aanvallen na onderzoek stuk voor stuk
werden toegewezen aan de ‘gematigde rebellen’ (lees door het westen
gesteunde psychopathische moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen),
houden de westerse reguliere media en het grootste deel van de
westerse politici vol dat Syrië ‘ofwel Assad’ de schuldige was…….
Uit
een groot aantal aanwijzingen zou volgens Moon of Alabama blijken dat
men o.a. samen met de White Helmets (onderdeel van Al Qaida Syrië dat door de VS van ‘de zwarte lijst’ is gehaald…) en CNN bezig
is een nieuwe ‘false flag’ operatie op touw te zetten, waarbij Syrië weer zal
worden aangewezen als dader van een gifgasaanval……
In het volgende artikel wordt o.a. uitgelegd dat chlorine amper slachtoffers maakt, terwijl men bij meerdere aanvallen met dit gas, sprak over het uiterst dodelijke sarin gas…….. Zoals men ook vorig jaar bij de aanval op Khan Sheikhoun, waarbij een voorraad chlorine van Al Qaida Syrië werd geraakt, stelde dat de Syrische luchtmacht sarin gas zou hebben ingezet, ook dit was alweer een leugen van enorme proporties…..
Een bericht eerder gepubliceerd op Moon of Alabama, zoals overgenomen op Information Clearing House 15 februari 2018:
Syria
– New ‘Chemical Weapons’ Fake Planned – Chlorine Though Will Not Do
By
Moon Of Alabama
February
15, 2018 “Information
Clearing House” – During the seven years of
the war on Syria several accusations were made that the government
that it had used ‘chemical weapons’ against the attacking extremists.
The Syrian government denied to have ever released any chemicals. The
implausible to murky ‘evidence’ of such incidents always came from
foreign paid propaganda groups and extremists on the ground.
They were likely staged to incriminate the government and to thereby
induce military attacks by foreign states.
We
currently see several reports which in their combination look like
preparations for of another fake ‘chemical weapon’ incident.
On
February 13 the Russian
Center for the Reconciliation of Opposing Sides in Syria noted a
warning of an upcoming false-flag ‘chemical attack’ incident:
“On
the evening of February 12, a resident from the Serakab settlement
located in the Idlib province called the Russian Center for
Reconciliaition to notify (the center) about a chemical weapons
attack that could be staged to provide footage for a foreign TV
channel,” the statement reads. “The caller said that
earlier on February 12, Jabhat al-Nusra members travelling in three
cars had brought more than 20
chlorine gas cylinders and
personal protective equipment to Serakab,” the Center added.
“According
to the caller, members of the local While Helmets branch wore
personal protective equipment while rehearsing first aid provision to
civilians suffering from chemical poisoning,” the Russian Center
said.
…
“The caller pointed out that all
the proceedings had been filmed by professional reporters who used a
mic with the CNN logo, while commenting on the actions being taken by
the White Helmets,”
the statement said, adding that in between takes, the reporters had
consulted with some people over a satellite telephone in English.
The White
Helmets are
a mostly British
funded propaganda
organization embedded with Hayat Tahreer Al-Sham, the current
incarnation of al-Qaeda in Syria which rules Idleb governorate. The
head of al-Qaeda in Syria, Abu Jaber Al-Sheikh, lauded
(video, alternative)
the White
Helmets as
the “hidden soldiers of our revolution”.
CNN is
currently embedded with al-Qaeda and is producing White
Helmets propaganda
in Idleb governorate:
CNN
Today @cnntoday – 12:23
AM – 14 Feb 2018
EXCLUSIVE
report from
@arwaCNN in #Idlib Syria and
@holmescnn has #TheBreakdown on more fighting in #Ghouta #Afrin
#DeirEzzor
The
Russian warning is not the only sign that another fake chemical
weapon attack is coming up.
The
Israeli government is pushing “top
secret” disinformation into the public which preemptively blames
the Syrian government for any upcoming incident. It is also attempts
to influence foreign governments on the issue:
According
to a “Top
secret” cable
sent to Israeli ambassadors earlier this week, Israel fears that the
Assad regime will use the chemical weapons it still has left in a way
which might spill over to Israeli territory. The contents of the
cable were shared
with me by senior Israeli officials.
…
[T]he
strategic division in the Israeli ministry of foreign affairs sent
the ‘Top Secret” cable to 15 Israeli embassies around the world,
including in Washington.
…
One of the more unusual
instructions in the cable was to
pass a strong message regarding the Israeli concern that the chemical
weapons left at the disposal of the Assad regime might be used
against rebel forces …
On
Tuesday the White
Helmets were
again trying to
get more foreign powers involved in fighting the Syrian government:
France
should stop talking about red lines and focus on real action to
persuade the main actors in Syria’s conflict to agree a ceasefire,
[Abdulrahman Almawwas], the vice-president of the Syria Civil
Defence, or “White Helmets”, said on Tuesday.
…
Speaking
after meeting senior French officials, including
Macron’s chief diplomatic adviser, Almawwas
said France needed to put pressure on the main protagonists, such as
pushing for a no-fly zone, even though he acknowledged France had few
options.
Only
hours after Abdulrahman Almawwas spoke with Macron’s chief
diplomatic adviser, the French president issued a
statement which set up a ‘red line’ trap:
“On
chemical weapons, I set a red line and I reaffirm that red line,”
Macron told reporters. “If we have proven
evidence that
chemical weapons proscribed in treaties are used, we
will strike the place where they are made.”
“Today, our
agencies, our armed forces have not established that chemical
weapons, as set out in treaties, have been used against the civilian
population.”
Setting
red lines is a trap for oneself as it includes an invitation to
others to break them. Anyone can release ‘chemical weapons’ in
insurgent controlled areas in Syria and blame the Syrian government –
thus potentially triggering the French ‘red line’. So far though
France has “not established” that a real chemical weapon
incident ever happened. Of note in Macron’s statement was also the
threat to strike at “the place where they are made”. That
place would likely be outside of Syria. The French Foreign Ministry
noted Macorn’s inconvenient choice of words, intervened and today
“clarified”
his remarks:
France’s
foreign minister on Wednesday sought to clarify his government’s
position on the use of chemical weapons in Syria saying that Paris
would only strike if the attacks were lethal and carried out by
government forces.
…
“(The
president) confirmed that he would proceed to military strikes
against regime installations if there was a new use of chemical
weapons by Bashar al-Assad’s forces when
these attacks are lethal and regime’s responsibility is proven,”
Jean-Yves Le Drian told lawmakers.
Al-Qaeda
will have no problem to create a “lethal” chemical weapon
attack. They have killed ten-thousands of Syrian without any remorse.
To “prove” that the Syrian government did it will be the
task of the White Helmets and its CNN and Atlantic
Council collaborators.
Chlorine
though will not do.
Source: Chlorine
– Properties (vid)
– bigger
In
their last attempt to smear the Syrian government for using ‘chemical
weapons’ those organizations hyped
the remainsof
a few 107mmm rockets which allegedly carried chlorine gas and were
fired against the Takfiri held areas of east-Ghouta. (Unmentioned
were the thousands of grenades fired by
east-Ghouta Takfiris against civilians in Damascus.)
If
those rockets had held chlorine they would have had no effect on
anyone.
Chlorine
gas is hardly ever deadly. It is 2.5 times heavier than air with a
distinct yellow-green color and a strong bleach odor. Chlorine gas
will only kill those submerged in a high concentration cloud. If one
sees or smells it one simply walks away from the cloud and thereby
stays safe. Chlorine was used as the first chemical weapon in World
War I because it would creep downwards into deep enemy ditches. Even
then it was soon found to be ineffective as a weapon and replaced
with other chemicals.
That
a few rockets with a few pounds of chlorine would have no ‘lethal’
effect is also obvious from official
reportsduring
the U.S. occupation of Iraq:
The
first documented chlorine attack was Oct. 21, 2006, in Ramadi, a
Multinational Force Iraq spokeswoman said. In that attack, terrorists
drove a car bomb with 12 120 mm mortar shells and two
100-pound chlorine tanks.
The attack wounded three
Iraqi policemen and a civilian.
The
first attack that received media attention was at Taji, where
terrorists remotely detonated a 5-ton truck packed with 100 pounds of
high explosives and two
1-ton chlorine tanks.
The attack killed
one civilian and
wounded 114 others.
…
The most recent attack was June 3
against Forward Operating Base Warhorse, in Diyala province. Again, a
suicide car bomber launched the attack, and officials estimate it
included two
tanks of chlorine and
1,000 pounds of explosive. The cloud from the attack blew over
Warhorse and sickened 65
servicemembers, Multinational Force Iraq officials said. All
were examined and returned to duty.
…
A
Multinational Force Iraq spokesman said there are anecdotal reports
that while
the blasts from the attacks have killed, few have died solely from
the gas.
“We hear that an old man and some babies may have been killed, but
we can’t pin that down,” the spokesman said.
If
literally tons of chlorine were used in attacks in Iraq with no
deadly effect how could a few pounds on top of some small rockets
kill anyone?
On
February 2 the U.S. Secretary of Defense Mattis acknowledge the
practical uselessness of chlorine by putting it into a “separate
category” than other chemical weapons. He also noted that
he has no evidence of any such weapon use:
Q: Is there evidence of chlorine gas weapons used — evidence of chlorine gas weapons?
SEC. MATTIS: I think that’s, yes —
Q:
No, I know, I heard you.
SEC.
MATTIS: I think it’s been used repeatedly. And that’s, as you know, a
somewhat separate category,
which is why I broke out the sarin as another — yeah.
Q: So
there’s credible evidence out there that both sarin and chlorine —
SEC.
MATTIS: No,
I have not got the evidence, not specifically. I don’t have the
evidence.
What
I’m saying is that other — that groups
on the ground, NGOs, fighters on the ground have said that sarin has
been used.
So we are looking for evidence. I
don’t have evidence, credible or uncredible.
NGOs
and “fighters on the ground” claimed to have evidence of
chemical weapon attacks. But just like the French agencies and armed
forces Macron mentioned, Mattis and the DoD have none.
The
Takfiris of al-Qaeda, the White
Helmets propaganda
shop and its media acolytes may well prepare, as the Russians report,
another fake chemical attack stunt. The Israeli government is busy
preparing the public relations ground. But the French government,
having trapped itself with ‘red line’ nonsense, then set the mark
higher at ‘lethal’ attacks.
Chlorine
is, as shown above, hardly ever lethal. But al-Qaeda will have no
qualms about coming up with a few corpses to prove the ‘lethality’ of
a fake incident.
We
also have seen how, with some outside help, a harmless chlorine
release can be faked in an allegedly deadly sarin attack. Such
happened in April 2017 in the Khan Sheikhun incident.
Multiple
early on-the-ground reports by local witnesses and Turkish
officials spoke
of chlorine release and
chlorine affected patients. Only a day later were these claims turned
into an alleged “sarin attack”. Real evidence was never
obtained from the al-Qaeda ruled grounds where that incident
happened.
A discredited
investigation was
inconclusive. It claimed some “sarin-like substance” may
have been involved but it could
not even explain why
more than 50 casualties of the claimed incident arrived at far away
hospitals BEFORE it had happened at all:
The
admission times of the [hospital] records range between 0600 and 1600
hours. Analysis of the aforementioned medical records revealed
that in
57 cases, patients were admitted in five hospitals before the
incident in Khan Shaykhun (at
0600, 0620 and 0640 hours).
One
has to agree with Secretary of Defense Mattis on this – some corpses
shown to CNN by “NGOs” and “fighters on the ground”
are not real evidence. Neither are discredited investigations. If the
al-Qaeda Takfiris and its supporters want to come up with some
believable fake they must set their standard much higher.
This
article was originally published by “Moon
Of Alabama”
===============================
Zie ook: ‘Gifgasaanval Idlib: de komende ‘kindslachtoffers’ worden getraind door terreurgroep White Helmets………‘
en: ‘Al Jazeera filmde een onderdeel van de ‘gifgasshow’ in Kahn Sheikhoun………..‘
en: ‘Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!‘
en: ‘Tulsi Gabbard (VS congres Hawaï): Trump is de beschermende Big Brother van Al Qaida‘
en: ‘Exactly how the US trained and armed ISIS‘
en: ‘CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering‘
en: Voorbeeld BBC en AD propaganda inzake Idlib (Syrië)‘
en: ‘John Bolton geeft terreurgroepen in Syrië de opdracht een false flag gifgasaanval uit te voeren‘
en: ‘Rusland heeft geen aanval uitgevoerd op VS troepen in Syrië…..‘
en: ‘Hondsdolle VS valt Russische tank aan in poging de Russen te provoceren……‘
en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!‘
en: ‘Syrië: VS en Israëlische agressie dreigt de wereld in een oorlog te storten……‘
en: ‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld‘
en: ‘Rusland voorspelde ‘de gifgasaanval’ in Oost-Ghouta en de reactie daarop van de VS…..‘
en: ‘Rusland beschuldigd GB van het regisseren gifgasaanval Douma en zegt daar bewijzen voor te hebben‘
en: ‘In Douma vond geen gifgasaanval plaats aldus gelauwerd journalist Robert Fisk…..‘
en: ‘De OPCW inspecteurs en hun werk in Douma n.a.v. ‘gifgasaanval…’‘
en: ‘The Guardian met propaganda over Syrië, die zo uit Orwells 1984 zou kunnen komen……‘
en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!‘
en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint‘
en: ‘Syrian ‘Rebels’ Used Sarin Nerve Gas Sold By Britain‘
en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….‘
en: ‘Nieuwe ‘as van kwaad’: VS, GB en Frankrijk uit op oorlog met Syrië en Noord-Korea……..‘
Voor meer berichten met gifgas, sarin gas, chlorine of false flag operaties, klik op de betreffende labels, direct onder dit bericht.
Nederlands
English
Русский
Español
简体中文
Français
Deutsch
हिन्दी
Italiano
Português