Bellingcat wordt betaald door de VS overheid ha! ha! ha! ha!

In een
artikel van Caitlin Johnstone maakt zij melding van Bellingcat en dat
deze zogenaamde journalistenclub wordt betaald door de VS….. De
National Endowment for Democracy (NED), die volgens een medeoprichter
is bedoeld om te doen wat de CIA eerder (en nog) doet, propaganda
maken voor de VS tegen landen die zich niet laten commanderen door
de VS, of schijt hebben aan de belangen van de VS……. NED wordt
direct betaald door de VS overheid, dus van enige onafhankelijkheid
is totaal geen sprake…… Bellingcat wordt weer direct betaald door
NED en daarmee is het kringetje rond: de VS betaalt Bellingcat……

Verbaasd me niets gezien de meer dan belachelijke, gekleurde berichtgeving van dit collectief van leken, je zou het nu zelfs als een trollenfabriek van de VS kunnen zien, immers ze doen niet anders dan het terroristische buitenlandbeleid van de VS van steun voorzien en brengen bijvoorbeeld door de VS opgestelde anti-Assad-propaganda….

NED is
als gezegd een organisatie die (ook in het geheim) propaganda tegen
landen opstelt en verspreidt, als deze zich niet naar de wensen van
de VS schikken en organiseren dan bijvoorbeeld (gewelddadige) demonstraties tegen een bepaalde regering, in de hoop dat dit tot een staatsgreep leidt, ofwel die aansturen op een regime verandering in dergelijke landen (voorbeelden te over uit het verleden…)

Terug naar Bellinqat uh Bellincat: Bellingcat
wordt voorts betaald door de Open Society Foundations (SOF)*,
als NED een neoliberaal orgaan dat ten dienste staat van de VS en
haar collega NAVO-lidstaten……

Bellingcat
heeft zich ook met MH17 bemoeit en zoals te verwachten: Bellingcat
steunt de leugen dat Rusland verantwoordelijk is voor het neerhalen
van dit vliegtuig, terwijl er meters dossiers liggen die toch echt
een andere kant op wijzen, niet voor niets ook dat de premier van Maleisië de JIT-rapportages totaal onbetrouwbaar acht…….

Ach het
is als met alle leugens die de VS zelf brengt, men slikt ze als zoete
koek in het westen, ook al blijkt die informatie keer op keer niet te
kloppen, toch steunen de meeste NAVO-lidstaten de grootschalige VS terreur als dit ‘land’ weer een nieuwe illegale oorlog begint….. Ook
Nederland steunt deze terreur en dat met ons belastinggeld, men hield nog even
af wat betreft de Straat van Hormuz (bij de Golf van Oman), waar de VS de marine van Iran treitert, maar nu gaat Nederland
daar ook oorlogje spelen met een fregat (marine oorlogsschip), of omdat de VS dat van ons eist, dan wel een volgende hielenlikkende actie van het walgelijke kabinet Rutte 3…

Hier de
tekst van Caitlin Johnstone:

Bellingcat is
funded
 by
the National Endowment for Democracy, which 
according
to its own cofounder
 was
set up to do overtly what the CIA had previously been doing covertly,
namely orchestrating narrative management geared toward the
elimination of governments which refuse to comply with US interests.
NED is 
funded
directly by the US government
,
which means that Bellingcat is funded by the US government via an
organization set up to promote imperialist regime change agendas.
Bellingcat is also funded by Open Society Foundations,
another 
imperialist
narrative management operation
.

*
De
Open Society Foundations (een echte SOF) is een privaat opererende en
fondsenverstrekkende stichting met als doel om overheidsbeleid te
hervormen en om democratisch bestuur, mensenrechten en economische,
juridische en sociale hervormingen te promoten…… ha! ha! ha! ha!
Het voorgaande is wat Wikipedia zegt over de Open Society
Foundations (behalve de tekst die tussen haakjes staat, zoals je begrijpt)….. In werkelijkheid heeft men in de VS schijt aan democratie, niet voor niets worden veel bloedige dictators gesteund door de VS, neem alleen al de banden met de reli-fascistische dictatuur Saoedi-Arabië, die NB met hulp van o.a. de VS een genocide uitvoert in Jemen….. (trouwens wat er in de VS zelf gebeurt heeft intussen ook al niets meer te maken met wat democratie zou moeten zijn…..) Wikipedia, steeds meer gevuld met leugens….. 


Zie ook:

Brief aan de Russische bevolking over ‘Defender 2020’, de zoveelste militaire NAVO oefening langs de grens van hun land‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)

MH17 proces op Radio1‘(en zie de links in dat bericht over MH17)

Na massamoord in Hawija: Nederlands fregat naar Golf van Hormuz‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)

Voor nog meer berichten over MH17, klik op het desbetreffende label, direct onder dit bericht. 


In mijn bericht schreef ik over een Nederlands fregat richting Golf van Oman, dat moet echter zijn de Straat van Hormuz, dat weliswaar een uitloper is van de Golf van Oman, mijn excuus. Noot van 28 november 2019.


Hersteller op 4 december 2019: in de kop stond Bellingcat zonder ‘g’, mijn excuus.

Geheime oorlogvoering van de VS in Afrika duurt voort, het aantal VS operaties in Afrika is zelfs groter dan in het Midden-Oosten

Het bericht met deels de bovenstaande kop lag tot mijn schaamte nog op de stapel concepten, ik vond het terug bij nazoeken van een artikel dat afgelopen woensdag werd gepubliceerd op Vice News door Nick Turse, het eerdere artikel van dezelfde schrijver is getiteld: ‘U.S. SECRET WARS IN AFRICA RAGE ON, DESPITE TALK OF DOWNSIZING’. Zoals gezegd: afgelopen woensdag publiceerde Turse het ander artikel over de VS oorlogsvoering in Afrika, dit keer met de titel: ‘EXCLUSIVE: THE U.S. HAS MORE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFRICA THAN THE MIDDLE EAST’. Als eerste het artikel van Turse dat op 26 juli jl. werd gepubliceerd, daarna een korte inleiding tot het laatste artikel van Turse. (waarin wordt gesteld dat de militaire operaties in de VS niet geheim moeten worden gehouden en dat door een hoge VS militair)

Oktober
vorig jaar liepen 4 VS militairen in een hinderlaag waarbij ze
omkwamen, dit gaf nogal wat ophef in de VS, waarop het Pentagon
aangaf het aantal troepen in Afrika te verminderen…

Niet
eens een jaar later blijkt er van dit voornemen, troepenvermindering
in Afrika, niets terecht te zijn gekomen……. De VS vecht (dat
vechten wordt ontkend, ondanks alle bewijzen daarvoor, zoals de 4
militairen die in Niger werden gedood) in de volgende Afrikaanse
landen Kameroen,
Kenia, Libië, Mali, Mauritanië, Niger, Somalië en Tunesië…

Vreemd ook dat in het rijtje landen Zuid-Soedan ontbreekt, terwijl ook daar VS militairen opereren……. De president van Soedan, Omar al-Bashir, is bepaald geen vriend van de VS en ondanks dat de VS een wapenembargo heeft ingesteld tegen Zuid-Soedan*, werkt de VS, in het ‘niet-zo-geheim’, samen met het terreurbewind in Zuid-Soedan…….

Generaal
Thomas Waldhauser, hoofd Africa Command (AFRICOM), zei tijdens een Pentagon
conferentie afgelopen mei, dat ondanks alle moeilijkheden de VS
militairen hun werk geweldig 
doen over het hele continent Afrika……. (beter had hij gezegd: dat de VS militairen hun werk uiterst gewelddadig doen, immers het gaat om grootschalige terreur in landen waar de VS niets te zoeken heeft, terreur waarmee de VS zelfs terreur kweekt! Tja als je dat erbij zou zeggen kan je moeilijk volhouden dat de VS goed werk verricht in Afrika….) 

Lees
het volgende artikel van Nick Turse, zoals eerder geplaatst op
The Intercept:

U.S.
SECRET WARS IN AFRICA RAGE ON, DESPITE TALK OF DOWNSIZING

 Nick
Turse
July
26 2018, 7:15 p.m.

An American Special Forces soldier trains Nigerien troops during an exercise on the Air Base 201 compound, in Agadez, Niger, April 14, 2018. Hundreds of American troops are working feverishly to complete a $110 million airfield that will be used to strike extremists in West and North Africa, a region where most Americans have no idea the country is fighting. (Tara Todras-Whitehill/The New York Times)

LAST
OCTOBER, FOUR
 U.S. soldiers – including two
commandos – were killed in an ambush in Niger. Since then, talk of
U.S. special operations in Africa has centered on missions being
curtailed and troop levels cut.

Press
accounts have suggested that 
the
number of special operators on the front lines has been reduced
,
with the head of U.S. Special Operations forces in Africa directing
his troops to 
take
fewer risks
.
At the same time, a “
sweeping
Pentagon review

of special ops missions on the continent may result in drastic cuts
in the number of commandos operating there. U.S. Africa Command has
apparently been asked to consider the impact on counterterrorism
operations of 
cutting
the number of Green Berets, Navy SEALs, and other commandos
 by
25 percent over 18 months and 50 percent over three years.

Analysts have
already stepped forward to 
question or criticize the
proposed cuts.

Anybody
that knows me knows that I would disagree with any downsizing in
Africa,”

Donald
Bolduc, a former chief of U.S. commandos on the continent, 
told
Voice of America
.

While
the review was reportedly ordered this spring and troop reductions
may be coming, there is no evidence yet of massive cuts, gradual
reductions, or any downsizing whatsoever. In fact, the number of
commandos operating on the continent has barely budged since 2017.
Nearly 10 months after the debacle in Niger, the tally of special
operators in Africa remains essentially unchanged.

According
to figures provided to The Intercept by U.S. Special Operations
Command (SOCOM), 16.5 percent of commandos overseas are deployed in Africa.
This is about the same percentage of special operators sent to
the continent in 2017 and represents a major increase over
deployments during the first decade of the post-9/11 war on terror.
In 2006, for example, 
just
1 percent of all U.S. commandos deployed overseas were in
Africa
 –
fewer than in the Middle East, the Pacific, Europe, or Latin America.
By 2010, the number had risen only slightly, to 3 percent.

Today,
more U.S. commandos are deployed to Africa than to any other region
of the world except the Middle East. Back in 2006, there were only 
70
special operators deployed across Africa
.
Just four years ago, there were still just 700 elite troops on the
continent. Given that an average of 8,300 commandos are deployed
overseas in any given week, according to SOCOM spokesperson Ken
McGraw, we can surmise that roughly 1,370 Green Berets, Navy SEALs,
or other elite forces are currently operating in Africa.

The
Pentagon won’t say how many commandos are still deployed in Niger,
but the total number of troops operating there is roughly the same as
in October 2017 when two Green Berets and two fellow soldiers
were 
killed
by Islamic State militants
.
There are 800 Defense Department personnel currently deployed to the
West African nation, according to Maj. Sheryll Klinkel, a Pentagon
spokesperson. “I can’t give a breakdown of SOF there, but it’s
a fraction of the overall force,” she told The Intercept. There are
now also 
500
American military personnel
 –
including Special Operations forces — in Somalia.  At the
beginning of last year, AFRICOM told Stars and Stripes, 
there
were only 100
.

None
of these special operations forces are intended to be 
engaged
in direct combat operations
,”
said Assistant Secretary of Defense for International Security
Affairs Robert S. Karem, while speaking about current troop levels in
Niger during a May Pentagon press briefing on the investigation into
the deadly October ambush. Despite this official policy, despite the
deaths in Niger, and despite the supposed curbs on special operations
in Africa, U.S. commandos there keep finding themselves in situations
that are indistinguishable from combat.

In
December, for example, Green Berets fighting alongside local forces
in Niger reportedly 
killed
11 ISIS militants
 in
a firefight. And last month in Somalia, a member of the Special
Operations forces, 
Staff
Sgt. Alexander Conrad, was killed
 and
four other Americans were wounded in an attack by members of the
Islamist militant group Shabaab. Conrad’s was the second death of a
U.S. special operator in Somalia in 13 months. Last May, a Navy
SEAL, 
Senior
Chief Petty Officer Kyle Milliken, was killed
,
and two other American troops were wounded while carrying out a
mission there with local forces.

Between
2015 and 2017, there were also 
at
least 10 previously unreported attacks
 on
American troops in West Africa, the New York Times revealed in March.
Meanwhile, Politico recently reported that, for at least five years,
Green Berets, Navy SEALs, and other commandos — operating under a
little-understood budgetary authority known as Section 127e that
funds classified programs — 
have
been involved in reconnaissance and “direct action” combat
raids
 with
local forces in Cameroon, Kenya, Libya, Mali, Mauritania, Niger,
Somalia, and Tunisia. Indeed, in a 2015 briefing obtained by The
Intercept, Bolduc, then the special ops chief in Africa, noted that
America’s commandos were not only conducting “surrogate” and
“combined” “counter violent extremist operations,” but also
“unilateral” missions.

While
media reports have focused on the possibility of imminent reductions,
the number of commandos deployed in Africa is nonetheless up 96
percent since 2014 and remains fundamentally unchanged since the
deadly 2017 ambush in Niger. And as the June death of Conrad in
Somalia indicates, commandos are still operating in hazardous areas.
Indeed, at the May Pentagon briefing, Gen. Thomas Waldhauser, the
chief of U.S. Africa Command, drew attention to special operators’
“high-risk missions” under “extreme conditions” in Africa. 
America’s commandos, he said, “are doing 
a
fantastic job across the continent
.”

Top
photo: An American Special Forces soldier trains Nigerien troops
during an exercise on the Air Base 201 compound, in Agadez, Niger, on
April 14, 2018.

We
depend on the support of readers like you to help keep our nonprofit
newsroom strong and independent. 
Join Us 

*
Volgens de NRC exporteerde de VS al minimaal wapens naar
Zuid-Soedan…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Het is de redactie blijkbaar
nog niet opgevallen dat de VS ook via omwegen een land vol kan
proppen met wapens (zoals de CIA al zo vaak heeft geregeld), desnoods (of zelfs het liefst) aan elkaar
bekampende groeperingen……

========================================

De VS heeft meer militaire operaties
in Afrika dan in Midden-Oosten

Hier het tweede artikel van Nick Turse op Vice News, een artikel dat zoals gezegd afgelopen woensdag werd gepubliceerd. Met iets meer actuele informatie. Gezegd moet worden dat Turse bij de aanvang van dit bericht een fout maakt, hij doelt duidelijk op een hinderlaag die in oktober 2017 plaatsvond, terwijl je uit z’n schrijven zou kunnen opmaken dat het om oktober 2018 gaat, in het artikel hierboven wordt ook oktober 2017 aangehaald.

In dit bericht schrijft Turse over het grote aantal militaire operaties die de VS uitvoert in Afrika, operaties die de operaties van de VS in het Midden-Oosten ver overtreffen, al is het aantal VS militairen in het Midden-Oosten veel groter.

Mijn excuus voor de belabberde weergave, krijg het niet op orde.

EXCLUSIVE:
THE U.S. HAS MORE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFRICA THAN THE MIDDLE EAST

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor EXCLUSIVE: THE U.S. HAS MORE MILITARY OPERATIONS IN AFRICA THAN THE MIDDLE EAST

By Nick
Turse
 Dec
12, 2018

The
deadly ambush in Niger last October that left four U.S. serviceman
dead prompted months of hand-wringing inside the Pentagon. But that
botched operation, which drew national attention to U.S.
counterterror operations throughout Africa should not have shocked
military leadership, the former commander of U.S. Special Operations
forces in Africa told VICE News.

These
weren’t the first casualties, either. We had them in Somalia and
Kenya,” said retired Brig. Gen. Donald Bolduc, who served as
commander of Special Operations Command Africa (SOCAFRICA) from 
April
2015
 to June
2017
,
in an interview with VICE News. “We had them in Tunisia. We had
them in Mali. We had them in Niger, Nigeria, Cameroon, and Chad. But
those were kept as quiet as possible. Nobody talked about it.”

Indeed,
two separate military efforts — named Juniper Shield and Obsidian
Nomad — that were 
set
to intersect but failed
 to
on the night of the deadly ambush near Tongo Tongo in Niger were part
of a pattern of expansion on the African continent that has made it
the most active U.S. military theatre in the world. The United States
has conducted more than 30 named operations and activities in Africa
over the last three years, according to documents obtained by VICE
News. While more troops are deployed to, and engaged in combat in,
the Greater Middle East, the sheer number of named efforts in Africa
actually surpasses that region.

VICE
News reviewed documents from the U.S. Army, Africa Command, and
Special Operations Command Africa, and conducted interviews with
current and former military personnel and experts familiar with
America’s “war on terror” in Africa. These documents and
testimony paint a startling picture of a sprawling, labyrinthine, and
at times chaotic shadow war on the African continent, in which
commandos are endangered by a lack of resources and “assistance”
operations blur with combat.

Africa
has more named operations than any other theater, including CENTCOM
[the command that oversees the Middle East],” Buldoc confirmed to
VICE News. “But remains under-resourced for doing what it’s been
directed to do.”

SECRETIVE
AND SPRAWLING

In
2017, U.S. troops carried out an average of nearly 10 missions per
day —
3,500
exercises, programs, and engagements for the year
 —
across the African continent, according to Gen. Thomas Waldhauser,
the AFRICOM commander.

These
efforts — carried out in at least 
33
countries
 —
range from capture-or-kill commando raids to more banal training
missions. Americans are also gathering intelligence, involved in
surveillance and reconnaissance missions carried out by drones,
engaged in construction projects, and accompanying allies on tactical
operations.

There
are also now 
34
U.S. military outposts
 on
the continent, concentrated in the north and west and the Horn of
Africa, according to a recent report by The Intercept.

US operations Africa

This
March 2018 briefing authored by Africa Command Science Advisor Peter
Teil outlines current U.S. military operations throughout the African
continent. (Nick Turse for VICE News).

Through
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), AFRICOM provided VICE News
with a list of 21 named operations conducted between January 1, 2016
and September 25, 2018. According to a separate March 2018 briefing,
authored by Africa Command Science Advisor Peter Teil and also
obtained via FOIA, eight current operations in North and West Africa
were aimed at countering the Islamic State and Boko Haram and
assisting local allies and French counterterrorism efforts. Six
operations in East Africa focused on defeating al Shabaab, assisting
the African Union Mission in Somalia, and counter-piracy. Two
theater-wide efforts focused on crisis response in the event U.S.
government personnel or facilities are threatened, while one
operation — Echo Casemate — provides support to French and U.N.
forces in the troubled Central African Republic.

A
separate Defense Department document, marked “For Official Use
Only,” that appears to have been posted online inadvertently, lists
12 named activities not on AFRICOM’s list, including eight in the
east and another four in the northwest.

Taken
together, these documents represent the most current and complete
record of named U.S. operations and activities recently conducted on
the continent, offering a window into a collection of
little-understood, often overlapping, military efforts unknown to
most Americans.

SPREAD
THIN, AND BLURRING LINES

US operations Africa

Somali
soldiers are on patrol at Sanguuni military base, where an American
special operations soldier was killed by a mortar attack on June 8,
about 450 km south of Mogadishu, Somalia, on June 13, 2018. – More
than 500 American forces are partnering with African Union Mission to
Somalia (AMISOM) and Somali national security forces in
counterterrorism operations, and have conducted frequent raids and
drone strikes on Al-Shabaab training camps throughout Somalia.
(MOHAMED ABDIWAHAB/AFP/Getty Images).

The
proliferation of so many concurrent counterterrorism efforts courts
danger, said Bill (William) Hartung, the director of the Arms and Security
Project at the Center for International Policy (ASPCIP).

Running
so many operations with combat implications without making them known
to the American public is both unwise and ultimately undemocratic. It
is no way to run foreign policy in a democracy,” he said. “And
running sensitive operations that are secret, or simply not widely
publicized, increases the risks of failure, because they are not
subject to public debate or adequate scrutiny.”

Bolduc
also criticized the lack of transparency on the part of AFRICOM.
“What we’re doing shouldn’t be a mystery,” he said.

Alice
Hunt Friend, the principal director for African affairs in the Office
of the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy from 2012 to 2014, said
the risks are compounded by the way these operations tend to blur
between “assistance” and combat.

If
the primary military activity in a country is assistance, then as we
saw in Niger, U.S. combat-related resources are not readily on hand,”
Friend explained.

Among
the operations that provide “assistance” are the classified 127e
programs. These secretive efforts are “aimed at assisting foreign
forces who support U.S. counterterrorism operations,” said Friend.

But
these activities often consist of far more than assistance, said
Bolduc. Classified 127e programs are “direct action” efforts,
which are defined by the Pentagon as “short-duration strikes and
other small-scale offensive actions conducted as a special operation
in hostile, denied, or diplomatically sensitive environments.”

Such
direct-action missions were carried out in Cameroon, Kenya, Libya,
Mali, Niger, Somalia, and Tunisia in recent years, as well as two
nations where the 127e programs have now ended, Ethiopia and
Mauritania, said Bolduc.

US operations Africa

Through
the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), AFRICOM provided VICE News
with a list of 21 named operations conducted between January 1, 2016
and September 25, 2018. Above is the list. (Nick Turse for VICE
News.)

The
Department of Defense declined to provide details about these
activities because many were “ongoing,” said Navy Commander
Candice Tresch, a Pentagon spokesperson.

We
are extremely lucky that there have not been more situations like
Niger,” said Hartung. “Running dozens of missions where U.S.
troops are liable to be thrust into combat roles is an extremely
risky approach, putting both their lives and our interests at risk.”

Buldoc
expressed particular concern over what he explained was a persistent
lack of support from the Pentagon. “When I left command, I had 96
missions and 886 tasks associated with those missions in 28 different
countries, in an area that was two and a half times the size of the
United States,” Bolduc said. “I was under-resourced in personnel
recovery. I was under-resourced in ISR [intelligence, surveillance,
and reconnaissance assets]. And I was under resourced in medical
support — the three key things that I needed.”

For
years, the special operations community and its 
supporters have
expressed concern over 
deployment
rates, 
operations
tempo, and the amount of resources being allocated to direct action
missions. “Most SOF units are employed to their sustainable
limit,” 
General
Raymond Thomas
 (III), the Special Operations Command chief, told members of Congress last
spring.

In
June, the New York Times reported that Secretary of Defense James
Mattis and Gen. Joseph F. Dunford Jr., the chairman of the Joint
Chiefs of Staff, had grown concerned that commandos across the globe
were 
spread
too thin
.
And the resources afforded to the team ambushed in Niger in 2017, for
example — who relied on contracted medical evacuation services,
French airpower, and lightly armored vehicles — have been
criticized as inadequate and dangerous.

Bolduc,
the former SOCAFRICA commander, laid much of the blame of the Niger
ambush on such deficits and a failure to adequately support local
allies. “That lack of resources — as well as fundamentally
misunderstanding the environment, the situation, and the threat —
meant that we were unable to help our partners solve a regional
problem. Because we didn’t provide an adequate military and
security response, the threat got stronger and more effective. The
direct result was the ambush of our SOF team in October 2017.”

Africa
Command’s official investigation, however, concluded that the “direct
cause of the enemy attack in Tongo Tongo is that the enemy achieved
tactical surprise there, and our forces were outnumbered
approximately three to one,” according to AFRICOM’s former chief
of staff, and now the head of the U.S. Army in Africa, Maj. Gen.
Roger Cloutier.

DRAWING
DOWN — SORT OF

The
Pentagon told VICE News that the total number of troops assigned to
AFRICOM — about 7,200 personnel — would be cut by less than 10
percent over several years, as it reviews its priority areas on the
continent and reorients itself toward great power rivals.

There
are, by comparison, roughly 
24,000
troops
 deployed
to Afghanistan, Iraq, and Syria, although President Trump recently
suggested that U.S. troops might be 
withdrawn from
the Middle East due to lower oil prices.

US military operations Africa

President
Donald Trump with, from left, Defense Secretary Jim Mattis, Trump,
Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Joseph Dunford and Marine
Corps Commandant Gen. Robert Neller, speaks during a briefing with
senior military leaders in the Cabinet Room at the White House in
Washington, Tuesday, Oct. 23, 2018. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta)

Pentagon
spokesperson Tresch said that the ambush in Niger had nothing to do
with the Defense Department’s decision to modestly decrease troop
levels in Africa. She said the move is predicated on the
 National
Defense Strategy
,
released earlier this year, which calls for increased focus on
near-peer competitors. The Trump administration is reportedly poised
to unveil a broader 
strategy
for Africa
 specifically
focused on countering the influence of Russia and China on the
continent.

As
we prioritize where we need to place concentrations of troops, there
were certain specialties — especially in the Special Operations
arena — that we didn’t necessarily need employed in Africa,”
AFRICOM’s Senior Enlisted Leader Chief Master Sergeant
 Ramon
Colon-Lopez
 told
VICE News.

Few,
if any, troops will be cut from hotspots like Libya and Somalia, nor
Djibouti, whose bases also play a pivotal role in U.S. operations in
Yemen and the greater Middle East. Nor will any region of the
continent see all U.S. forces removed. Troop drawdowns in West Africa
will be marked by a shift from tactical-level support to a greater
emphasis on advising, training and intelligence-sharing, the Pentagon
said.

Bolduc,
who supports robust military and diplomatic engagement on the
continent, warned that any significant cuts to special operations
forces would irreparably harm U.S. interests in Africa. 

“We’re
becoming risk averse and it’s slowing down the amount of support we
provide to our partner nations in training, advising, assisting, and
accompanying them,” he said. “We’re basically ceding our
strategic leverage and relationship with our African partners to the
Chinese and the Russians.”

But
Friend said there was greater risk in small teams of special
operators conducting far flung and secretive missions on the
continent.

The
fact that American forces were out in the field like that made them
vulnerable to [ISIS in the Greater Sahara] attacks. If they’re not
forward and not out there, it’s much harder to attack them,” she
said. “So, one of the choices in front of DoD decision-makers is
‘do we want to keep forces forward?’ and therefore ‘what kind
of support do we need to give them?,’” Friend said.


Cover
image: Malian soldiers take part in training at the Kamboinsé
general Bila Zagre military camp near Ouagadougo in Burkina Faso
during a military anti-terrorism exercise with US Army instructors on
April 12, 2018. (ISSOUF SANOGO/AFP/Getty Images)

==================================

Zie ook:

VS vermoordt zoals gewoonlijk straffeloos burgers in geheime Somalische oorlog

VS bombardementen: 62 vermoorde stadsbewoners in Somalië

De VS heeft 500 militairen ingezet in Somalië, het imperium breidt zich verder uit……

VS illegaal militair ingrijpen in Niger, ofwel de uitspattingen van een imperium met expansiedrift

VS ‘helden’ helpen Somalische troepen bij het vermoorden van kinderen, één van de specialiteiten van deze helden……….

Jeroen Leenaers (CDA): Somalië is ‘veilig’ voor vluchtelingen………….‘ en in het verlengde daarvan: ‘Jeroen Leenaers (CDA EU): ‘veilige landen’ moeten asielzoekers terugnemen, anders zwaait er wat…….. OEI!!!‘ en: ‘Amnesty International beschuldigt Nederland van het schenden van de mensenrechten, door Somaliërs terug te sturen……

VS, in 2016 vermoordde de VS 24.000 mensen, uit landen die op de lijst van inreisverboden staan…….

VS pleegt aanslag op een leider van al-Shabaab, geen ‘onschuldige slachtoffers…..’

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

In
het volgende bericht van Darius Shahtahmasebi geeft de VS letterlijk
toe ook speciale troepen te hebben in Midden- en Zuid-Amerikaanse
landen….. Dit was al bekend, maar een officiële bevestiging daarvoor was er tot nu toe niet. Waar deze speciale troepen (commando’s) zijn, adviseren ze niet alleen, maar vechten ze ook en in dit geval zou dat tegen acties van Al Qaida of IS zijn…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! En dat door een ‘land’, de VS, dat het beste is aan te duiden als de
grootste terreurentiteit op aarde………..

Shahtahmasebi legt in zijn artikel uit, dat de VS ook de gewone
troepen wil gaan inzetten als speciale troepen, ofwel de geheime terroristische acties van de VS, zullen worden uitgebreid met
gebruikmaking van onderdelen uit het gewone leger als speciale commando’s………. Dit naast de openlijke terreur die de VS uitoefent middels illegale oorlogen…..

In Afrika zou de VS in 20 landen bezig zijn met speciale troepen, wat tot nu toe tot 100 operaties heeft geleid……

Arme mensen, die met deze gehersenspoelde (en onder invloed van o.a. psychofarmaca), psychopathische moordenaars te maken krijgen……..

Overigens zou de NAVO intussen een militaire bases in Zuid-Amerika hebben (Colombia), uiteraard onder direct bevel van het Pentagon….. Zo mogen wij via de NAVO meebetalen aan VS-terreur in steeds meer landen…… Eén van de redenen waarom meer van de door ons opgebrachte belastinggelden naar de NAVO moeten…….

Department
of Defense Announces Major Changes to US Military Operations in 2018

January
4, 2018 at 2:00 pm

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA)  An
interesting overlooked development taking place within the U.S.’
ever-expanding military is the recent announcement that conventional
forces will begin blurring their roles with those of Special Forces,
according to the
 Department
of Defense
.

At
the end of last year, Defense Secretary James “Mad Dog” Mattis
told Pentagon reporters that the experiences of war since the 9/11
attacks have blurred the lines between the two forces, noting that
general purpose forces will eventually shoulder missions of their
Special Forces counterparts.

I
anticipate more general purpose forces being used for some of the
missions,”
 he said. “In
the past, we used only special forces to do it. The general purpose
forces can do a lot of the kind of work that you see going on and, in
fact, are now.

Specifically,
Mattis expects this to happen within Iraq and Syria (bear in mind
that U.S. troops, whether or not they are Special Forces, do not have
the legal basis to operate in Syrian territory).

I
mean, there was a time when the only people who ran drones were the
Special Forces,”
 Mattis
also
 said,
as quoted by 
Military.com.
He said the use of drones is now widespread in the conventional
force.

Special
Operators have complained that they are overstretched, having
been
 deployed
almost everywhere across the globe
.
In 2017, fourteen of the 33 U.S. troops
 killed
were assigned
 to
Special Forces operations, several of whom died in battle arenas
where the Trump administration has expanded counter-terrorism
operations over the past year.

We
are not the ultimate solution to every problem, and you will not hear
that coming from us,”
 Gen.
Raymond “Tony” Thomas (III), SoCom commander,
 told the
Senate Armed Services Committee in May 2017.

We
operate and fight in every corner of the world,”
  Thomas
also
 reportedly
said
. “On
a daily basis, we sustain a deployed or forward stationed force of
approximately 8,000 across 80-plus countries. They are conducting the
entire range of SOF [Special Operations Forces] missions in both
combat and non-combat situations.”

Special
Forces are
 typically
tasked
 with
carrying out 12 core missions, including counterinsurgency and
unconventional warfare to hostage rescue. As the 
Washington
Post
 established,
these Special Forces are frequently on the ground to coordinate fire
support, acting as an “
observation
element for what appears to be US airstrikes carried out by A-10
ground attack aircraft.”
 According
to a
 report by Vice
News
,
at any given time, U.S. Special Forces are conducting nearly 100
missions across 20 African countries. According to the 
Nation, Thomas
also said:

Special
Operations Forces are the main effort, or major supporting effort for
US VEO-focused operations in Afghanistan, Syria, Iraq, Yemen,
Somalia, Libya, across the Sahel of Africa, the Philippines, and
Central/South America—essentially, everywhere Al Qaeda (AQ) and the
Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS) are to be found…”

The
recent change seems likely to indicate that the U.S. will be stepping
up its involvement in areas it deems hotbeds of terrorism, perhaps
opening up the door to
 something
more confrontational
.

It
also seems likely that we will see the increased presence of Special
Forces — as well conventional forces who have been trained to act
like Special Forces — in places well outside the Middle East and
Africa, including 
the
Philippines
.

According
to Mattis, this change will most likely affect the dynamics in the
Afghanistan theater, as well. The Army’s new “Security Force
Assistance Brigades” (SFAB) is expected to deploy in the spring to
Afghanistan to train, advise, and assist the duties of the Special
Forces with the conventional Afghan forces.

We’re
going to be putting more American forces, advisers, in the more
conventional force in the Afghan army. As you know, they have not had
them, and they’ve not — they were not ready to fight in the way
we want them to,”
 Mattis
said.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

==========================================

9 ‘ex-FARC rebellen’ vermoord door leger Colombia: FARC-EP opgericht

Mensenrechten- en milieuactivisten worden massaal vermoord in Brazilië en Colombia, waar het laatste land NAVO bases heeft…….

Koenders heeft vrijlating gegijzelde Spoorloos makers in Colombia bewerkstelligt……. AUW!!!

Paus Franciscus in Colombia om vrede te prediken……

People of Brazil: my sincere condolences with ‘your’ fascistic, psychopathic president Bolsonaro……

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

NAVO naar Zuid-Amerika? Weg met dit agressieve, terroristische bondgenootschap, NU!!!

Bolton geeft toe dat de VS een fascistisch beleid voert……

Bolsonaro, de fascistische nieuwe president van Brazilië, werd volgens Avaaz en fake news brengers als de NYT gekozen door manipulatie via WhatsApp

Bolsonaro wint Braziliaanse verkiezingen >> weer zijn we een fascistisch geleid land ‘rijker…’

Braziliaanse verkiezingen: democratie versus (neo-) fascisme, ook een groot gevaar in Europa

Katy Sherriff (Radio1 correspondent Z-Amerika) brandt socialistische partij Brazilië af……

Voor meer grootschalige VS terreur zie:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

NAVO militair bevelhebber wil verdere uitbreiding troepen in Europa in kader van oorlogvoering tegen Rusland…………

Terreuraanslag in Iran moet acties uitlokken die de VS tot een oorlog met Iran ‘dwingen’

PS: vergeet niet de coup tegen de democratisch gekozen regering van Honduras in 2009, dit o.l.v. de VS (Hillary Clinton speelde ook daar een heel smerige rol) en de economische oorlog tegen Venezuela, waar de VS directe banden heeft met gewapende groepen in dat land en hen ondersteunt……..

NAVO operatie in Syrië in voorbereidingsfase……… Daarom moet u meer betalen voor defensie: meer aanslagen in Europa!

Op de onlangs gehouden NAVO vergadering, waarbij de deelnemers voorafgaand aan het bezoek van het beest Trump, zich in de broek scheten, heeft de NAVO besloten zich als partij te mengen in de illegale oorlog die de VS tegen dat land voert…….. Op welk beroep dit werd gedaan weet ik niet, maar het kan niet zijn omdat één lid van de NAVO wordt aangevallen. Dat zou in dit geval de VS moeten zijn, maar die voert zoals gezegd een illegale oorlog tegen Syrië (m.a.w.: de VS is illegaal op Syrisch grondgebied..)….. Vergeet ik nog een andere NAVO partner, Turkije, dat ook illegaal oorlog voert in Syrië…… (daarover zo meer)

Uiteraard beroept men zich op de terreuraanslagen in ons deel van Europa, echter er wordt nu al meer dan 15 jaar in het Midden-Oosten (inclusief Afghanistan en Libië) oorlog gevoerd, zogenaamd een oorlog tegen terreur, maar het aantal aanslagen neemt alleen maar toe…….. Logisch met grootschalige terreur kweek je terreur…….

In feite kan Nederland door die NAVO beslissing bijna niet anders, dan ook aanvallend optreden in Syrië……. Trouwens was toch al hypocriet, het verzamelen van inlichtingen met F16 straaljagers, waarna de aangewezen doelen door anderen worden gebombardeerd………

Tussen 2 haakjes: Afgelopen week hoorde ik dat Nederland nog steeds patriot raketten in Incirlik (Turkije) heeft staan (dacht dat deze missie al was afgeblazen)……. Weet u wat daarvoor de kosten zijn??? In 2013 lagen de kosten boven de 42 miljoen (Duitsland doet ‘t voor de helft van de prijs…), reken maar uit uw winst….’ Deze raketten staan ter bescherming van Turkije, tegen ‘de agressie’ van Syrië, terwijl Turkije aan de andere kant van de grens illegaal op Syrisch grondgebied oorlog voert, ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Waar Turkije ook tegen het Syrische reguliere leger ‘vecht’, dit door wapenleveranties aan ‘gematigde Syrische rebellen’ (psychopathische moordenaars voor het grootste deel uit andere landen, dan Syrië….)……. En daar geven wij geld aan uit……

Onlangs bleek nog eens dat er 1 miljard van het VS defensiebudget is verdwenen……. Men durfde daar nog serieus over te lullen ook, terwijl iedereen weet, dat daarvoor wapens, munitie en voertuigen aan de ‘gematigde rebellen’ in Syrië werden geleverd…..

Overigens gesproken over dit budget: de NAVO geeft in haar geheel zonder de VS vele keren meer uit aan defensie dan Rusland!!

Van Baalen vindt het een heel ernstige zaak, dat Nederland maar zo weinig uitgeeft aan Defensie……* ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, de onbeschofte VVD oliebol wil net als de VS her en der illegale oorlogen voeren en ja dan heb je nog veel meer meer miljarden nodig dan we nu al uitgeven aan de oorlogsmachine, waartoe onze defensie intussen is uitgegroeid…….. Benieuwd ook hoe zijn EU onkostenrekening eruit ziet…….. Van Baalen noemde dit zoals gezegd i.h.k.v. de NAVO eis (eis van het beest Trump uit naam van de VS) tot een veel grotere bijdrage aan de NAVO middels het defensiebudget van de lidstaten.

‘Toevallig ook’ dat Frankrijk en Groot-Brittannië van zins zijn om vanuit Jordanië met grondtroepen Syrië binnen te trekken en het Syrische gebied waar het land grenst aan Irak en Jordanië veilig te stellen middels militair bestuur (waar de ‘gematigde rebellen’ uiteraard welkom zijn……)… Nogmaals: alles illegaal onder het Verdrag van Genève… Nederland dat al met troepen in Irak aanwezig is vergroot het aantal militairen met 20 zodat er 175 Nederlandse militairen in Irak aanwezig zullen zijn,  het is niet duidelijk of Nederlandse troepen ook de grens met Syrië zullen oversteken….

Voor die illegale actie, hebben GB en Frankrijk natuurlijk de hulp nodig van meer landen, komt de beslissing van de NAVO om in Syrië te gaan vechten even goed uit!!!


Hier het artikel van Strategic Culture:

NATO
Launches Its Own Operation in the Middle East

NATO Launches Its Own Operation in the Middle East


PETER
KORZUN
 |
31.05.2017 | 
WORLD

The
recent NATO summit took a 
decision to
formally become a member of the US-led coalition fighting the Islamic
State (IS), in addition to its training mission in Iraq.

Last
year, NATO started a training and capacity-building mission for Iraqi
armed forces. In January, it opened a regional center in Kuwait. NATO
AWACS aircraft operate in Syria. But the participation in combat
actions against the IS has so far been limited to a few aircraft
taking part in the operations of the US-led coalition of the willing.
Formally, each alliance member contributes to the coalition, but NATO
as its own entity does not. Despite the coalition’s efforts, the IS
had grown and expanded in Syria till Russia launched its military
operation there in 2015.

France
and Germany 
have
always had reservations
 about
the prospect of joining the anti-IS coalition as an alliance,
concerned that it would lead to NATO taking over the fight or
overshadowing regional partners, such as Jordan, Saudi Arabia and the
United Arab Emirates. Italy has been skeptical of the plan.

Despite
all the speeches ringing alarm bells about the deadly threat coming
from the IS – the mortal enemy of the West that vowed to fight it
till it exists – the bloc’s combat ready forces are
deploying…against Russia in the Eastern Europe! As a result, the
alliance has seen no need to counter the IS plans to create a
caliphate. It stubbornly turns a blind eye on the peril coming from
the South.

Migrant
flows are flooding the territories of European alliance members,
terrorist acts are committed to kill citizens of the NATO member
states, US and Turkish military are fighting the extremists on the
ground but the bloc largely limits itself to words of condemnation
while demonizing Russia – the country which says it does not want
to provoke confrontation and calls for a dialogue!

The
summit’s decision to join the fight comes at a time the US, UK and
France-backed rebel forces based in Jordan are reported to be
preparing for operations on Syrian soil. On May 18, US aircraft
struck a convoy of forces affiliated with the Syrian government. The
attack occurred in far southern Syria near al-Tanf, along the
Syria-Iraq border – an area where US Special Operations Forces
(SOF) are training local fighters. The leading NATO member plunged
directly into the Syrian conflict taking sides. Evidently, the move
signaled broadening of American involvement in the six-year Syrian
civil war. The US has led the anti-IS in Syria since 2014, but so far
has avoided engaging with Syrian government or Iran-backed forces.

The
US, the UK and France are the leading members of the alliance and
there is little doubt they are preparing to cross the border and
establish control over the region where the borders of Jordan, Syria,
and Iraq meet. They will need support of other nations, especially
the allied ones and it coincides with NATO’s decision to become
part of the anti-IS operation. The control over the area by
NATO-supported forces will include a key highway from Baghdad to
Damascus that Iran has used to supply weapons to Syrian forces.
Al-Tanf is a strategic crossing located at the intersection of the
Jordanian, Iraq, and Syrian borders and commands the No.1 Route
linking Baghdad with Damascus and the Jordanian capital of Amman.

It
all happens at a time NATO members involved in the combat actions and
Israel are deeply concerned over the recent visit of a high-ranking
Iraqi military to Damascus to discuss the situation on the
Syrian-Iraqi border. The allegation that Iraq’s Prime Minister
Haidar al-Abadi has pivoted his support away from the US-led
campaign to the Russia-Turkey-Iran coalition adds even more fuel to
the fire.

Definitely,
the contribution will increase. Right after the summit on May 25, the
Netherlands announced the decision to send two more warplanes to
fight the IS. From mid-June a Dutch KDC-10 tanker aircraft will be
stationed in Kuwait. And in the last quarter of the year, a C-130
transport plane will be contributed to the fight for two months.
About 90 military personnel will go with the planes. The new
deployment will temporarily increase the number of Dutch soldiers in
Iraq to about 175, twenty more than previously agreed. The Dutch
commandos currently supporting Iraqi troops on the front will be
equipped with armored vehicles and other weapons systems from next
month. The Netherlands also expressed readiness to contribute
several F-16 fighters from early next year. Other NATO members will
increase the contribution to support the NATO effort. It will
increase but it is worth to remember that the bloc’s operations in
Libya and Afghanistan ended up in failure.

Expanding
NATO role in Syria may lead to either confrontation or coordination,
or at least de-confliction, with the Russia-Syria-Iran forces.
Turkey, a NATO country, is a member of Russia-Turkey-Iran trio
pushing forward the Astana peace process. And the common enemy is the
IS. Coordination of efforts appears to be a logical step. The issue
should top the NATO-Russia Council agenda along with the plans to
establish de-escalation zones. It could be discussed with Russian
President Vladimir Putin during the G20 summit.

Some
arrangement with Russia is unavoidable. But is it an achievable goal
with NATO building up its forces in the Baltics, Poland, Romania and
the whole Black Sea region? Can Russia and NATO fruitfully coordinate
efforts, or even cooperate, in Syria with tensions running high in
Europe? Evidently, the standoff between Russia and NATO benefits no
one but IS. Finding mutual understanding is indispensable to defeat
the common enemy. Actually, playing off the West against Russia is
the IS only hope for survival. That’s the expectation the group
must be deprived of. It remains to be seen if these arguments are
taken into consideration as NATO joins the fray.

Tags: NATO  Middle
East
  US 

==========================

*  Van Baalen zei letterlijk dat het onaanvaardbaar is, dat de VS nu meer uitgeeft aan defensie dan Nederland….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Nogmaals: of wij ook her en der illegale oorlogen beginnen en daarnaast de 2 andere grootste kernmachten op aarde, Rusland en China uitdagen…… (deze toevoeging heb ik na plaatsing van het bericht gedaan op 3 juni om 20.39 u. )

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u hieronder aantreft.