De echte ‘American Dream’ was die van de oorspronkelijke volkeren van de VS

Gisteren was het in de VS ‘Indigenous People Day’ en niet toevallig dat Lewis
Borck een artikel over deze volkeren schreef. Borck is dan ook de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel, eerder gepubliceerd op The Conversation (Creative Commons), waarin hij de ‘American Dream’ onder de loep heeft genomen. Borck kwam tot de conclusie dat de
werkelijke American Dream, met o.a. gelijkheid en zelfbestuur (dus zonder
een enorme overheid) al bestond onder de oorspronkelijke bevolking
van Noord-Amerika.

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor indigenous people day

Men
dacht dat met een dergelijke vorm van zelfbestuur, men geen grote
bouwwerken kon maken, anders dan over een periode van honderden
jaren. Deze mythe is intussen doorgeprikt daar men een groot bouwwerk
vond dat in een paar jaar tijd werd gebouwd, door samenwerking van
stammen, die in feite nog jagers verzamelaars waren.

In aanvang was de macht nog verdeeld onder elites en deze macht was gebaseerd op religieuze gronden. Echter deze vorm van bestuur werd losgelaten, waarschijnlijk daar men inzag dat een dergelijke machtsuitoefening onrecht en (zware) corruptie in de hand werkt. Daarop werd de religieuze leiders hun macht afgenomen, hetzelfde gebeurde met die elites, waarna voor een vorm van zelfbestuur werd gekozen, die in feite nog steeds te zien is bij de oorspronkelijke volkeren van de VS (althans de afstammelingen van degenen die de genocide van de witte kolonisten hebben overleefd). Volgens zeggen zou men elke vorm van machtsvorming door elites en religie met succes hebben bestreden.

Kortom
er zijn wel degelijk veel voorbeelden die aangeven dat (lokaal en
regionaal) zelfbestuur op basis van een roulerend leiderschap dan wel een wisselend collectief wel degelijk werkt…….

Onlangs
werd hetzelfde gezegd over een stad in Mexico waar men de corrupte
politici, al evenzo corrupte politie en georganiseerde misdaad verjaagde. Intussen werkt dit
zelfbestuur geweldig en is de stad welvarend geworden……

Indigenous
People Invented the American Dream — Columbus Invaded It

(let op de eerste gekleurde persoon aan de rechterkant van de psychopathische veroveraars ‘ontdekkingsreizigers’, gezien diens houding is deze afgebeeld als een aap, al werden deze oorspronkelijke volkeren een enorm stuk slechter behandeld dan apen, althans als je dierproeven op deze arme dieren niet meerekent……)

October
7, 2018 at 10:34 pm

Written
by 
The
Conversation

(CONVERSATION— When
President Barack Obama 
created Deferred
Action for Childhood Arrivals, the 2012 program that
offered 
undocumented
young people brought to the U.S. as children a path into society
,
for a moment the ideals of the American Dream seemed, at least for
this group, real.

We
call these kids, many of whom are now adults, “
Dreamers,”
because they are chasing the American Dream – a 
national
aspiration for upward economic mobility built on physical mobility
.
Fulfilling your dreams often means following them wherever they may
lead – even into another country.

The
Trump administration’s decision to 
cancel
DACA
 –
which is currently on hold while it is 
litigated
in the courts
 –
and 
build
a U.S.-Mexico border wall
 has
endangered those dreams by subjecting 800,000 young people to
deportation.

But
the 
notion
underlying both Trump’s DACA repeal and the wall
 –
which is that “
illegal
immigrants, most of them from Mexico, are 
stealing
U.S. jobs
 and
hurting society – reflects a profound misunderstanding of American
history.

On Indigenous
Peoples Day
,
it’s worth underscoring something that many archaeologists know:
Many of the values that inspire the 
American
Dream
 –
liberty, 
equality and the
pursuit of happiness
 –
date back to well 
before
the creation of the U.S.-Mexico border
 and
before freedom-seeking Pilgrim immigrants arrived at Plymouth Rock in
1620.

They
originate with native North Americans.

A
Native American Dream

The
modern rendition of the American Dream can be traced back to 1774,
when Virginia’s governor, John Murray, the fourth earl of
Dunmore, 
wrote that
even if Americans “attained Paradise, they would move on if they
heard of a better place farther west.”

The
actual term “American Dream” was popularized in 1931 by the
businessman and historian 
James
Truslow Adams
.
For him, its realization depended on not just being able to better
oneself but also, through movement and human interaction, seeing your
neighbors bettered as well.

The
first peoples to come to the Americas also came in search of a better
life.

That
happened 14,000 years ago in the last Ice Age when 
nomadic
pioneers
,
ancestors to modern Native Americans and First Nations, arrived from
the Asian continent and roamed freely throughout what now comprises
Canada, the United States and Mexico. Chasing 
mammoth,
ancient bison and the elephant-like Gomphothere
,
they moved constantly to secure the health of their communities.

The
indigenous communities of the Americas knew none of these modern-day
national borders. USGS

A
more recent example of the power of migration reappears about 5,000
years ago, when 
a
large group of people from what is today central Mexico
 spread
into the American Southwest and farther north, settling as far up as
western North America. With them they brought corn, which now 
drives
a significant part of the American economy
,
and a way of speaking that birthed over 30 of the 169 
contemporary
indigenous languages
 still
spoken in the United States today.

The
Hohokam

This
globalist world view was alive and well 700 years ago as well when
people from what is now northern Arizona fled a decades-long drought
and rising authoritarianism under religious leaders.

Many
migrated hundreds of miles south to southern Arizona, joining the
Hohokam – 
ancestors
to modern O’odham nations
 –
who had long thrived in the harsh Sonoran desert by 
irrigating
vast fields of agave, corn, squash, beans and cotton
.

When
the northern migrants arrived to this hot stretch of land around the
then-nonexistent U.S.-Mexico frontier, Hohokam religious and
political life was controlled by a handful of elites. Social
mechanisms restricting the accumulation of power by individuals had
slowly broken down.

For
decades after their arrival, migrants and locals interacted. From
that exchange, a Hohokam cultural revolution grew. Together, the two
communities created a commoners’ religious social movement
that 
archaeologists
call Salado
,
which featured a feasting practice that invited all village members
to participate.

As
ever more communities adopted this 
equitable
tradition
,
political power – which at the time was embedded in religious power
– became more equally spread through society.

Elites
lost their control and, eventually, abandoned their temples.

America’s
Egalitarian Mound-Builders

The
Hohokam tale unearths another vaunted American ideal that originates
in indigenous history: equality.

Long
before it was codified in the 
Declaration
of Independence,
,
equality was enacted through the building of large 
mounds.

Massive
earthen structures like these are often acts of highly hierarchical
societies – think of the pyramids of the ancient Egyptians,
constructed by 
masses
of laborers
 as
the final resting place of 
powerful
pharaohs
,
or those of the 
rigid,
empire-building
 Aztecs.

But
great power isn’t always top-down. 
Poverty
Point
,
in the lower Mississippi River Valley of what’s now Louisiana, is a
good example. This massive site, which consists of five mounds, six
concentric semi-elliptical ridges and a central plaza, was built some
4,000 years ago by hunter-fisher-gatherers with little entrenched
hierarchy.

Poverty
Point: a city built on cooperation. Herb Roe/Wikipedia, CC BY-SA

Originally,
archaeologists 
believed that
such societies without the inequality and authoritarianism that
defined the ancient Egyptian, Roman, and Aztec empires could not have
constructed something so significant – and, if so, only over
decades or centuries.

But
excavations in the last 20 years have revealed that large sections of
Poverty Point were 
actually
constructed in only a few months
.
These Native Americans organized in groups to undertake massive
projects as a communal cooperative, leaving a built legacy of
equality across America’s landscape.

The
Consensus-Building Haudenosaunee

The
Haudenosaunee, or 
Iroquois,
offer a more modern example of such consensus-based decision-making
practices.

These
peoples – who’ve lived on both sides of the St. Lawrence river in
modern-day Ontario and the U.S. Great Lakes states for 
hundreds,
if not thousands, of years
 –
built their society on collective labor arrangements.

They
ostracized people who exhibited “selfish” behavior, and women and
men often worked together in 
large
groups
.
Everyone lived together in communal longhouses. Power was also
shifted constantly to prevent hierarchy from forming, and decisions
were made by coalitions of kin groups and communities.

Many
of these participatory political practices 
continue
to this day
.

The
Haudenosaunee sided with the British during the 1776 
American
Revolution
 and
were largely driven off their land after the war. Like 
many
native populations
,
the Haudenosaunee Dream turned into a nightmare of invasion, 
plague
and genocide
 as
European migrants pursued their American Dream that excluded others.

Native
Americans at Standing Rock

The
long indigenous history of rejecting authoritarianism continues,
including the 2016 battle for 
environmental
justice at Standing Rock
,
South Dakota.

There,
a resistance movement coalesced around a 
horizontally
organized youth group
 that
rejected the planned 
Dakota
Access oil pipeline
.

Native
American pioneers continue to fight for the same ideals that inspire
the American Dream, including equality and freedom. John
Duffy/Wikimedia, CC BY-SA

The
movement centered on an environmental cause in part because nature is
sacred to the Lakota – and to 
many
other indigenous communities
 –
but also because communities of color often 
bear
the brunt of economic and urban development decisions
.

Standing
Rock was the indigenous fight against repression and for the American
Dream, gone 21st century.

Redefining
the North American Dream

Anthropologists
and historians haven’t always recognized the quintessentially
Native American ideals present in the American Dream.

In
the early 19th century, the prominent social philosopher Lewis Henry
Morgan 
called
the Native Americans he studied “savages.”
 And
for centuries, America’s native peoples have seen their 
cultural
heritage attributed to seemingly everyone but their ancestors
 –
even to an invented 
“lost”
white race
.

America’s
indigenous past was not romantic. There were petty disputes, 
bloody
intergroup conflicts
 and
slavery, namely 
along
the Northwest Coast
 and American
Southeast
.

But
the ideals of freedom and equality – and the right that Americans
can move across this vast continent to seek it out – survive
through the millennia. Societies based on those values have prospered
here.

So
the next time a politician invokes American values to 
promote
a policy of closed borders
 or selfish
individualism
,
remember who originally espoused the American Dream – and first
sought to live it, too.

By Lewis
Borck
 and D.
Shane Miller
 / Creative
Commons
 / The
Conversation
 / Report
a typo

=========================================

*
Zie: ‘
Anarchie werkt: corruptie is uit te bannen >> in de Mexicaanse stad Cherán zijn de politieke partijen en politie aan de kant gezet >> stad floreert!

Anti-Russische propaganda, waarin Rusland verantwoordelijk wordt gesteld voor de protesten tegen VS pijpleiding projecten, ook al als onzin doorgeprikt

Niets
weerhoudt een groot deel van de VS ervan Rusland verantwoordelijk te
houden voor alles wat niet lukt, dan wel volkomen fout gaat en voor protesten in de VS tegen
pijpleidingen en het fracken voor schalie-olie- en schaliegaswinning….. Dat laatste: protesten tegen smerige projecten, is de laatste zaak die toegevoegd wordt aan de algemene westerse anti-Russische propaganda leugencarrousel….. 

Het wachten is op een volgend onderwerp dat wordt toegevoegd aan deze propaganda, te denken valt aan protesten tegen de algehele vernieuwde kernwapendoctrine, de inzet van het kernwapen als eerste aanvalswapen, althans als je daar nog mensen voor op straat krijgt…… (waar de VS zelfs een cyberaanval als reden voor die inzet ziet….)  De situatie nu is veel ernstiger dan die in de 70er en 80er jaren van de vorige eeuw, terwijl er toen miljoenen mensen de straat op gingen tegen kernwapens, is er nu zelfs geen aanzet tot het organiseren van (wereldwijde) demonstraties…..

Nu
worden dus ook de anti-pijpleiding protesten van de laatste paar jaar in de VS toegeschreven aan Rusland……… Zelfs hare kwaadaardigheid Hillary
Clinton, die het gore lef heeft zich af te schilderen als
milieubewust, durfde Rusland als verantwoordelijke voor de protesten
aan te wijzen……..

Lees het
volgende hoofdstuk van de Russiagate soap en zie hoe door en door
verrot de VS politiek is:

No,
Russia Didn’t Use Propaganda on Social Media to Incite US Pipeline
Protests

March
6, 2018 at 6:21 am

Written
by 
Kevin
Gosztola

(SP Op-ed) — A
“staff report” from Republicans on the United States House
Science, Space, and Technology Committee offers little evidence to
prove allegations of Russian efforts to influence U.S. energy markets
through “social media propaganda” to incite pipeline protests.

Nonetheless, the
report
,
pushed by Republican chairman Representative Lamar Smith, went
virtually unquestioned when it was covered by U.S. media.

What
the report reveals are several Twitter and Instagram posts that
Republicans claim were posted by “Russian agents” linked to the
Internet Research Agency (IRA), the troll farm which has become a
focus of narratives that Russia interfered in the 2016 presidential
election.

The
report recycles unsubstantiated news reporting that strongly
suggested the Russian government was behind anti-fracking activism in
the U.S. It contends these posts and tweets demonstrate the “broad
nature of Russia’s meddling and to reveal Russia’s attempts to
deceive and influence the American public, especially as related to
domestic energy issues.”

Between
2015 and 2017, there were an estimated 9,097 Russian posts or tweets
regarding U.S. energy policy or a current energy event on Twitter,
Facebook and Instagram,” according to the report. “Between 2015
and 2017, there were an estimated 4,334 IRA accounts across Twitter,
Facebook and Instagram.”

To
understand how these numbers are incredibly minuscule, there are
about 95 million posts to Instagram per day and 800 million or more
users, as of September 2017. About 500,000 comments, 293,000 status
updates, and 136,000 photos are posted to Facebook daily. There are
over 2 billion active users on Facebook. On Twitter, about 500
million or more tweets are posted each day. There are 330 million
active monthly users.

House
Republicans did not break down the number of IRA accounts by
platform. But if the 4,334 accounts were all Twitter accounts, it
would mean the number of active Russian accounts represented less
than 0.0013 percent of Twitter users. That percentage would be much
smaller for Facebook and Instagram.

As
for reported posts and tweets, because Republicans are pulling from
contents that appeared between 2015 and 2017, they are essentially
revealing an average of 3,000 or so posts and tweets appeared each
year.

What
is 3,000 out of the 95 million posts to Instagram? What is 3,000 out
of the hundreds of thousands of comments and updates to Facebook?
What is 3,000 out of 500 million or more tweets?

These
are smaller than microscopic numbers. They barely can be said to
represent a broad influence campaign by Russia to undermine U.S.
fossil fuel industries and incite opposition to American “energy
independence.”

The
“Russian tweets” are not even disinformation. They mostly appear
to be messages containing advocacy from Senator Bernie Sanders,
presidential candidate in the 2016 election, and his supporters. For
example:

These
tweets reference the health impact of natural gas fracking. They
mention the link between earthquakes and fracking. They note
political efforts to ban fracking through state ballot initiatives.
What they do not do is promote disinformation, such as falsehoods
about the fossil fuel industry.

The
report continues a blatant agenda by Republicans to discredit climate
activism against oil and gas pipelines. It even argues Russians are
trying to make “useful idiots” of “unwitting
environmental groups and activists in furtherance of its energy
influence operations.”

In
July 2017, Smith and Republican Representative Randy
Weber 
urged Treasury
Secretary Steven Mnuchin to “investigate whether the Kremlin [was]
bankrolling green campaigns against the fracking technology that
helped the U.S. overtake Russia in gas production.”

But
as POLITICO noted, “Allegations have circulated for years that
Moscow has sought to discourage European countries from developing
their own natural gas supplies as an alternative to Russian fuel. And
conservatives have sought to extend those concerns to the U.S.—though
there’s little but innuendo to base them on.”

A
surge in activism against pipeline projects, especially as the
impacts of climate change intensify, has brought pressure to fossil
fuel industry interests. Smith is one of the industry’s most ardent
defenders. He even publicly contends climate change is still subject
to debate when it is settled science.

An
Inside Climate News report 
details how
the fossil fuel industry is a major contributor to science committee
members. It donated $8 million from 2006 to 2016, making it the
leading source of “industry political action committee money.”
The oil and gas industry  is one of Smith’s biggest
contributors, “with $764,000 in donations over the course of his
career in Congress.”

Smith
frequently alleges charges of “secret science” against government
agencies that seek to regulate coal-fired power plants, oil
refineries, and energy pollution in general. He engages in the very
kind of efforts to provoke discord and disruption that the House
science committee report condemns. It is all to manufacture doubt in
order to tie up policy deliberations in debate so they do not affect
companies’ profits.

While
this report is clearly rubbish, Democrats have not said anything to
challenge the allegations. Perhaps, this is because they are fully
invested in the narrative that Russia is meddling in all parts of
American discourse on social media.

Smith
invokes the bipartisan consensus on “Russian manipulation.”
Democratic Senator Ben Cardin recently published a report that
stated, “According to NATO officials, Russian intelligence agencies
also reportedly provide covert support to European environmental
groups to campaign against fracking for natural gas,
thereby keeping the EU more dependent on Russian supplies. A study by
the Wilfried Martens Center for European Studies reports that the
Russian government has invested $95 million in NGOs that seek to
persuade EU governments to end shale gas exploration.”

During
a tinePublic 
speech in
2014, former Democratic presidential nominee Hillary Clinton accused
“phony environmental groups” that she believes are funded by the
Russians of being responsible for the opposition to oil pipelines and
natural gas fracking. “I’m a big environmentalist, but these were
funded by the Russians to stand against any effort, oh that pipeline,
that fracking, that whatever will be a problem for you, and a lot of
the money supporting that message was coming from Russia.”

Much
of the notion among conservatives that U.S. climate activism is
funded by Russia stems from a report by a front group, the
Environmental Policy Alliance, operated by Berman & Co., which is
run by Rick Berman.

Berman
is known for 
attacks against
Mothers Against Drunk Driving. He also has defended Big Tobacco from
anti-smoking campaigns. He previously 
boasted,
“If the oil and gas industry wants to prevent its opponents from
slowing its efforts to drill in more places, it must be prepared to
employ tactics like digging up embarrassing tidbits about
environmentalists and liberal celebrities” and urged industry
executives “to exploit emotions like fear, greed and anger and turn
them against the environmental groups.”

Part
of Berman’s efforts to exploit emotions involved accusing U.S.
environmental organization of accepting money from the Sea Change
Foundation, which allegedly accepted funds from a Bermuda-based
company called Klein Limited with executives tied to Russian oil and
gas companies.

We
double-check confirmed that the origin of the funds we’re getting
from Sea Change is through a donor, not from Russia,” Melinda
Pierce, Sierra Club’s legislative director, 
declared.
“It’s a private U.S. citizen who cares about climate change and
has invested in the kind of work that the Sierra Club does to move us
off dirty energy to clean energy.”

This
campaign to smear U.S. environmental organizations as agents of the
Russian oil and gas industry was picked up by Republicans. It
influenced a 2014 
report,
“The Chain of Environmental Command: How a Club of Billionaires and
Their Foundations Control the Environmental Movement and Obama’s
EPA.”

Back
then, it was innuendo and unsubstantiated claims intended to help the
industry defend itself against pipeline activists. It remains
industry-driven propaganda.

The
only difference now is that the current political climate embraces a
bipartisan consensus that Russians will stop at nothing to sow
discord. Democrats do not see conservative political action
committees and right-wing industry front groups as responsible for
political turmoil over issues mired in contentious debate. They see
Russians, and even if they do not deny the reality of climate change,
that leaves U.S. policy vulnerable to actions that are aimed at
protecting fossil fuel companies and drowning out protest from
citizens concerned about climate change.

Op-ed Kevin Gosztola /
Republished with permission / 
Shadow
Proof
 / Report
a typo

==============================

Zie voor de hiervoor genoemde corruptie van Lamar Smith: ‘Exxon lobbyist (politicus) dagvaardt milieugroepen voor kennis bij Exxon over klimaatverandering…….

Bedrijven maken veelal de dienst uit, ten koste van de democratie, op naar de nieuwe fascistische orde!!

Het volgende artikel van Chris Hedges (en Matt Taibbi in de bijgevoegde video) op Information Clearing House (overgenomen van ‘Truth Dig’) handelt over de neergang van de democratie en haar instituties t.b.v. grote bedrijven, banken en het militair-industrieel complex, noodzakelijk voor de uiteindelijk beoogde fascistisch machtsovername…… (Bedrijven functioneren uitstekend in een fascistische staat….)

De vakbonden zijn verworden tot grote instituties waar kapitalen worden verspild en die nog amper van enige betekenis zijn. De reguliere (massa-) media zijn in handen van enkele figuren en dienen als eerste het belang van die topgraaiers en vervolgens het belang van de zittende neoliberale regering (althans als die goed voor de bedrijven werkt….). Wat betreft de publieke zendgemachtigden, zoals de BBC (en de NOS in ons land), is het dienen van het belang van de zittende regering overduidelijk….. Ach ja, wiens brood men eet……….

Het is in ons land al zo zot, dat men het normaal vindt, dat de Eerste Kamer bestaat uit figuren die in het (grote) bedrijfsleven werkzaam zijn en uiteraard lobbyen voor die bedrijven (bedrijven inclusief de financiële maffia en het militair-industrieel complex….). Een zienswijze die wordt gedeeld door de reguliere massamedia……..

In de VS gaat men zover, dat kritische studenten worden weggezuiverd van de universiteiten……. Ook de rechterlijke macht fungeert, meer en meer als een klassen-justitieel systeem, waar de belangen van het neoliberalisme worden gediend…… Dat geldt overigens ook voor een groot deel voor Nederland, zo besloot vanmorgen de hoogste bestuursrechter in Nederland, de Raad van State, dat er naar gas mag worden geboord bij Terschelling……..* (klik ook op het label ‘klassenjustitie’, dat u onder dit bericht terugvindt).

Lees dit uitstekende artikel en zie de bijgevoegde video (onder het artikel kan u klikken voor een ‘Dutch’ vertaling, dit neemt wel enige tijd in beslag):

The
Elites Won’t Save Us

By
Chris Hedges

February
13, 2017 “
Information
Clearing House

– “Truth
Dig
” – The four-decade-long assault on our democratic
institutions by corporations has left them weak and largely
dysfunctional. These institutions, which surrendered their efficacy
and credibility to serve corporate interests, should have been our
firewall. Instead, they are tottering under the onslaught. 

Labor
unions are a spent force. The press is corporatized and distrusted.
Universities have been purged of dissidents and independent scholars
who criticize neoliberalism and
decry the decay of democratic institutions and political parties.
Public broadcasting and the arts have been defunded and left on life
support. The courts have been stacked with judges whose legal careers
were spent serving corporate power, a trend in appointments that
continued under Barack Obama. Money has replaced the vote, which is
how someone as unqualified as Betsy DeVos can buy herself a Cabinet
seat. And the Democratic Party, rather than sever its ties to Wall
Street and corporations, is naively waiting in the wings to profit
from a Trump debacle.

The
biggest asset Trump has is the decadent, clueless, narcissistic,
corporate-indentured, war-mongering Democratic Party,” Ralph
Nader
 said when I reached him by phone in Washington. “If
the Democratic strategy is waiting for Godot, waiting for Trump to
implode, we are in trouble. And just about everything you say about
the Democrats you can say about the AFL-CIO.
They don’t control the train.”

The
loss of credibility by democratic institutions has thrust the country
into an existential as well as economic crisis. The courts,
universities and press are no longer trusted by tens of millions of
Americans who correctly see them as organs of the corporate elites.
These institutions are traditionally the mechanisms by which a
society is able to unmask the lies of the powerful, critique ruling
ideologies and promote justice. Because Americans have been bitterly
betrayed by their institutions, the Trump regime can attack the press
as the “
opposition
party
,” threaten to cut off university
funding
, taunt a federal jurist as a “so-called
judge
” and denounce
a court order
 as “outrageous.”

The
decay of democratic institutions is the prerequisite for the rise of
authoritarian or fascist regimes. This decay has given credibility to
a pathological liar. The Trump administration, according to an
Emerson College poll, is considered by 49 percent of registered
voters to be truthful while the media are considered truthful by only
39 percent of registered voters. Once American democratic
institutions no longer function, reality becomes whatever absurdity
the White House issues.

Most
of the rules of democracy are unwritten. These rules determine public
comportment and ensure respect for democratic norms, procedures and
institutions. President Trump has, to the delight of his supporters,
rejected this political and cultural etiquette.

Hannah
Arendt
 in “The Origins of Totalitarianism” noted that
when democratic institutions collapse it is “easier to accept
patently absurd propositions than the old truths which have become
pious banalities.” The chatter of the liberal ruling elites about
our democracy is itself an absurdity. “Vulgarity with its cynical
dismissal of respected standards and accepted theories,” she wrote,
infects political discourse. This vulgarity is “mistaken for
courage and a new style of life.”

He
is destroying one code of behavior after another,” Nader said of
Trump. “He is so far getting away with it and not paying a price.
He is breaking standards of behavior—what he says about women,
commercializing the White House, I am the law.”

Nader
said he does not think the Republican Party will turn against Trump
or consider impeachment unless his presidency appears to threaten its
chances of retaining power in the 2018 elections. Nader sees the
Democratic Party as too “decadent and incompetent” to mount a
serious challenge to Trump. Hope, he said, comes from the numerous
protests that have been mounted in
the streets
at
town halls
 held by members of Congress and at flash points
such as Standing
Rock
. It may also come from the 2.5 million civil servants within
the federal government if a significant number refuse to cooperate
with Trump’s authoritarianism.

The
new president is clearly aware of the power wielded by civil
servants, who swear an oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution,
not to any president or administration,” Maria J. Stephan, the
co-author of “Why Civil Resistance Works,” writes
in The Washington Post
. (WaPo) “One of Trump’s first acts as
president was a sweeping federal hiring freeze affecting all new and
existing positions except those related to the military, national
security and public safety. Even before Trump’s inauguration, the
Republican-controlled House of Representatives reinstated an obscure
1876 rule that would allow Congress to slash the salaries of
individual federal workers. This was a clear warning to those serving
in government to keep their heads down. Trump’s high-profile firing
of acting attorney general Sally Yates, who refused to follow the
president’s immigration ban, sent shock waves through the
bureaucracy.”

A
sustained, nationwide popular uprising of nonviolent obstruction and
noncooperation is the only weapon left to save the republic. The
elites will respond once they become afraid. If we do not make them
afraid we will fail.

The
four-decade-long assault on our democratic institutions by
corporations has left them weak and largely dysfunctional. These
institutions, which surrendered their efficacy and credibility to
serve corporate interests, should have been our firewall. Instead,
they are tottering under the onslaught. 

Labor
unions are a spent force. The press is corporatized and distrusted.
Universities have been purged of dissidents and independent scholars
who criticize neoliberalism and
decry the decay of democratic institutions and political parties.
Public broadcasting and the arts have been defunded and left on life
support. The courts have been stacked with judges whose legal careers
were spent serving corporate power, a trend in appointments that
continued under Barack Obama. Money has replaced the vote, which is
how someone as unqualified as Betsy DeVos can buy herself a Cabinet
seat. And the Democratic Party, rather than sever its ties to Wall
Street and corporations, is naively waiting in the wings to profit
from a Trump debacle.

The
biggest asset Trump has is the decadent, clueless, narcissistic,
corporate-indentured, war-mongering Democratic Party,” Ralph
Nader
 said when I reached him by phone in Washington. “If
the Democratic strategy is waiting for Godot, waiting for Trump to
implode, we are in trouble. And just about everything you say about
the Democrats you can say about the AFL-CIO.
They don’t control the train.”

The
loss of credibility by democratic institutions has thrust the country
into an existential as well as economic crisis. The courts,
universities and press are no longer trusted by tens of millions of
Americans who correctly see them as organs of the corporate elites.
These institutions are traditionally the mechanisms by which a
society is able to unmask the lies of the powerful, critique ruling
ideologies and promote justice. Because Americans have been bitterly
betrayed by their institutions, the Trump regime can attack the press
as the “
opposition
party
,” threaten to cut off university
funding
, taunt a federal jurist as a “so-called
judge
” and denounce
a court order
 as “outrageous.”

The
decay of democratic institutions is the prerequisite for the rise of
authoritarian or fascist regimes. This decay has given credibility to
a pathological liar. The Trump administration, according to an
Emerson College poll, is considered by 49 percent of registered
voters to be truthful while the media are considered truthful by only
39 percent of registered voters. Once American democratic
institutions no longer function, reality becomes whatever absurdity
the White House issues.

Most
of the rules of democracy are unwritten. These rules determine public
comportment and ensure respect for democratic norms, procedures and
institutions. President Trump has, to the delight of his supporters,
rejected this political and cultural etiquette.

Hannah
Arendt
 in “The Origins of Totalitarianism” noted that
when democratic institutions collapse it is “easier to accept
patently absurd propositions than the old truths which have become
pious banalities.” The chatter of the liberal ruling elites about
our democracy is itself an absurdity. “Vulgarity with its cynical
dismissal of respected standards and accepted theories,” she wrote,
infects political discourse. This vulgarity is “mistaken for
courage and a new style of life.”

He
is destroying one code of behavior after another,” Nader said of
Trump. “He is so far getting away with it and not paying a price.
He is breaking standards of behavior—what he says about women,
commercializing the White House, I am the law.”

Nader
said he does not think the Republican Party will turn against Trump
or consider impeachment unless his presidency appears to threaten its
chances of retaining power in the 2018 elections. Nader sees the
Democratic Party as too “decadent and incompetent” to mount a
serious challenge to Trump. Hope, he said, comes from the numerous
protests that have been mounted in
the streets
at
town halls
 held by members of Congress and at flash points
such as Standing
Rock
. It may also come from the 2.5 million civil servants within
the federal government if a significant number refuse to cooperate
with Trump’s authoritarianism.

The
new president is clearly aware of the power wielded by civil
servants, who swear an oath of allegiance to the U.S. Constitution,
not to any president or administration,” Maria J. Stephan, the
co-author of “Why Civil Resistance Works,” writes
in The Washington Post
. “One of Trump’s first acts as
president was a sweeping federal hiring freeze affecting all new and
existing positions except those related to the military, national
security and public safety. Even before Trump’s inauguration, the
Republican-controlled House of Representatives reinstated an obscure
1876 rule that would allow Congress to slash the salaries of
individual federal workers. This was a clear warning to those serving
in government to keep their heads down. Trump’s high-profile firing
of acting attorney general Sally Yates, who refused to follow the
president’s immigration ban, sent shock waves through the
bureaucracy.”

A
sustained, nationwide popular uprising of nonviolent obstruction and
noncooperation is the only weapon left to save the republic. The
elites will respond once they become afraid. If we do not make them
afraid we will fail.

Chris
Hedges, spent nearly two decades as a foreign correspondent in
Central America, the Middle East, Africa and the Balkans. He has
reported from more than 50 countries and has worked for The Christian
Science Monitor, National Public Radio, The Dallas Morning News and
The New York Times, for which he was a foreign correspondent for 15
years.

The
views expressed in this article are solely those of the
author and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of Information
Clearing House.

Insane
Clown President”

Chris
Hedges and Matt Taibbi

Video

How a reality TV
star became our president.

Chris Hedges examines the spectacle
of the 2016 presidential election and the system that created
President Donald Trump with Matt Taibbi, author of “Insane Clown
President”.

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.
 

==========

* Lees en teken a.u.b. de petitie tegen gasboringen bij Terschelling!

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor de labels: Arendt, Nader, M.J. Stephan en Taibbi.

ING topman stelt dat ING zich niet kan terugtrekken uit DAPL….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

ABN Amro maakte gisteren bekend, dat het zich terugtrekt uit het Dakota Acces Pipeline (DAPL) project, dat dwars door heilig gebied van de Sioux dreigt te worden aangelegd. Een goede zet, ook al verliest de bank daar geld mee.

Je zou denken, dat ook ING zich daarna terug zou trekken uit dit walgelijke project, maar nee hoor…….

Had een paar weken geleden al een kladbericht liggen over deze zaak met ING, maar helaas nog niet aan toegekomen.

Destijds zei de topman (weet niet of het dezelfde was als gistermiddag), toen bijna hetzelfde als ING grofgraaier Arnoud Cohen Stuart gistermiddag op BNR (na 16.00 u.), niet anders te kunnen, dan zich juridisch aan het contract te houden……… De woordvoerder een paar weken geleden voegde daar aan toe, dat de kosten van de boete te hoog waren, om zich terug te trekken uit DAPL

Zowaar werd flapdrol Cohen Stuart gistermiddag het vuur aan de schenen gelegd door Petra Grijzen, de presentator. Zij bleef vasthouden aan de vraag waarom ING besloot in dit project stappen. Volgens deze bedrieger had men een onafhankelijk adviseur in de arm genomen, die de zaken zou bekijken op o.a. duurzaamheid en of de aanleg eventueel problemen met bestaande bewoners zou opleveren……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Duurzaamheid en een olie pijpleiding: een contradictio in terminis…….

Als deze adviseur, die voor meerdere banken optrad, zijn/haar werk niet goed heeft gedaan, zou ik die maar eens gaan vervolgen, kan de schade voor ING nog beperkt worden ook!! Echter gezien het gestumper van deze topman tijdens het gesprek, ‘kan je bijna niet anders concluderen’, dan dat ING wel degelijk van deze zaak af wist.

Cohen Stuart durfde het niet echt hardop te zeggen, maar als je ‘m hoorde draaien, zouden de ‘indianen’ (het Sioux volk) eerst wel akkoord zijn gegaan met de aanleg van een pijpleiding, die hoe dan ook zal gaan lekken, zoals de praktijk iets te vaak heeft bewezen……….

Er is dan ook maar één reden waarom ING zich niet wil terugtrekken uit het DAPL project: een fikse boete en niet dat e.e.a juridisch niet mogelijk zou zijn…… M.a.w.: om juridisch onder dit contract uit te komen, moet je een boete betalen! Kortom, Cohen Stuart is een enorme leugenaar!!

Overigens is het wel bijzonder vreemd, dat ING en ABN Amro, ondanks dat ze pretenderen alleen nog duurzaam te investeren, zich hebben geleend voor een project, dat het tegenovergestelde is van duurzaamheid: transport van olie (en daarmee investeringen in oliewinning!)……. Smerige bedriegers!!

Vanaf de start van het onzalige DAPL project was bekend dat men geen rekening hield met het Sioux volk!! Om dat te kunnen weten, had men geen adviseur nodig maar een goede internetverbinding!!

Op Radio1 ‘interviewde’ men gistermiddag mensen op straat n.a.v. het steunen van zware misdaad in Mexico door de Rabobank, (daarover later wellicht meer) en of dat een bezwaar was voor hen. Gelukkig zeiden 2 passanten dat ze dit een kwalijke zaak vonden, maar dat overstappen naar een andere bank een heel gedoe is…….

Daar sloegen deze mensen de spijker op de smerige bankenkop: we hebben intussen wel een achterlijk lang bankrekeningnummer, zogenaamd als het burgerservicenummer voor het hele leven, behalve dan als je…… vertrekt bij je bank!! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De banken spenderen jaarlijks miljoenen aan lobby bij de politiek, zowel in Den Haag als Brussel, als in andere landen waar banken werkzaam zijn en die lobby werkt als een trein, zoals u kon lezen!!

Waarom kunnen we wel ons telefoonnummer meenemen, maar niet ons banknummer?? Dat nummer kan voorlopig toch niet aan een ander worden toegekend. Maar de bankenmaffia stelt doodleuk dat een rekeningnummer meenemen erg ingewikkeld is….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja ingewikkeld hè, als bankrekeninghouders je straffen voor fout investeringsbeleid, door over te stappen naar een andere bank, stelletje oplichters!!

We moeten ons banknummer opeisen, kunnen we eindelijk een banken als ING en Rabobank straffen voor extreem smerige investeringen!!! (maar ook voor ‘gewoon smerige’ investeringen)

Het is ronduit een schande dat de banken zoveel te zeggen hebben, zeker nadat ze ons in een enorme crisis hebben gestort, een crisis de in feite nog steeds voortwoekert……..

Zie ook: ‘Help het Sioux volk van Standing Rock in hun terechte (vreedzame) verzet tegen bodem- en watervervuiling…..

         en: ‘Canada’s Standing Rock….. Stop de Site C Dam!

        en: ‘ING financiert de Dakota Access Pipeline, die het leefgebied van het Sioux volk bedreigt……….

        en: ‘ING liegt dat het niet onder contract DAPL uit kan………

        en: ‘North-Dakota Pipeline, grote schande voor Obama en de VS…….

        en: ‘Keystone XL pijpleiding heeft grote hoeveelheid olie gelekt, terwijl vreedzame demonstranten tegen de aanleg worden weggezet als terroristen……

        en: ‘The Dakota Access Pipeline Is Already Leaking

        en: ‘List of pipeline accidents in the United States in the 21st century‘ (stuitend!!)



        en: ‘VS overheden behandelden demonstranten tegen de DAPL als terroristen, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten…..

        en: ‘Grote banken moeten stoppen met het financieren van klimaatrampen en de rechten van de oorspronkelijke bevolking her en der respecteren!’

        en: ‘Grote banken overtreden eigen duurzaamheidsregels……..

        en: ‘Regering Brits-Columbia liegt over olievervuiling…….‘ (zie ook de verdere links onder dat bericht)



        en:  http://standwithstandingrock.net/history/

        en:. http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pipeline-nativeamericans-safety-i-idUSKCN11T1UW
        en:  
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/04/dakota-access-pipeline-permit-denied-standing-rock
        en:
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161204005090/en/
        en:  
http://ieefa.org/ieefa-report-dakota-access-pipeline-driven-high-risk-financing-overbuilt-region-little-known-economic-weaknesses-controversial-project

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

ING financiert de Dakota Access Pipeline, die het leefgebied van het Sioux volk bedreigt……….

Gisteren ontving ik van Food & Water Watch een petitie gericht aan banken, die de Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) financieren. Eén van  die banken is ‘onze eigen’ ING. Deze oliepijpleiding gaat dwars door het leefgebied van het Sioux volk en over en door voor hen heilig grondgebied en rivier. Gezien alle rampen met pijpleidingen, waar de reguliere media ‘vreemd genoeg’ amper aandacht voor hebben, is het te belachelijk voor woorden, dat die pijpleiding juist daar aangelegd moet worden…….

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor standing rock protest

Let wel: een dergelijk project wordt nooit gelegd in de buurt van ‘rijke steden’, of gebieden waar veel welgestelden wonen en als men dit toch probeert, is het plan binnen de kortste keren afgevoerd, waarna een alternatieve route wordt gekozen…….. Er staat nu een ban op deze Dakota Access Pipeline, dit door ingrijpen van de U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE), maar Trump zal na zijn aantreden deze ban vrijwel onmiddellijk opheffen……..

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor standing rock protest

Lees het artikel en de tekst van het volgende artikel en teken a.u.b. mee als u klant bent van ING (of klant van de andere genoemde banken), geef het door!

Who’s
Bankrolling the Dakota Access Pipeline?
Tell
17 Big Banks to Stop Funding This Dirty Project.

If
you are thinking of moving your money to a bank not financing the
Dakota Access Pipeline, please note where you currently bank so that
we can have greater and more specific impact.

Petition
to the 17 banks on the project loan for the Dakota Access Pipeline
(Bank of Tokyo Mitsubishi UFJ, BayernLB, BBVA, BNP Paribas,
Citigroup, Crédit Agricole, DNB ASA, ICBC,
ING,
Intesa Sanpaolo, Mizuho Bank, Natixis, SMBC, Société Générale,
SunTrust Robinson Humphrey, TD Bank, Wells Fargo):

Stop
supporting the Dakota Access Pipeline and disregarding the inherent
sovereignty and rights of Indigenous peoples, including
self-determination, Free, Prior and Informed Consent and the rights
recognized and affirmed in the 1851 and 1868 Fort Laramie Treaties
with the Sioux. 

The
vast majority of you have signed the Equator Principles, in which you
commit to resolve differences to the satisfaction of Indigenous
peoples. And, according to the United Nations Guiding Principles on
Business and Human Rights, you all have a responsibility to respect
human rights and remediate human rights violations linked to your
business operations. 

The
militarized police actions against peaceful and unarmed water
protectors have been widely and publicly condemned, and may result in
a U.S. Department of Justice investigation into police misconduct and
civil rights abuses. 

Continuing
to finance DAPL signals your approval of the use of militarized force
against those asserting their First Amendment rights and traditional
spiritual beliefs and practices, and disregard for Indigenous
responsibilities to protect people, lands and water. 

We
demand that you discontinue DAPL loan disbursements until outstanding
issues with the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe and the Seven Council Fires
of the Great Sioux Nation – Oceti Sakowin are resolved, and Equator
Principle 5, which requires Free, Prior and Informed Consent from
Indigenous peoples, is upheld.

Urge
the banks funding the Dakota Access pipeline to pull their money out
of this terrible investment!


Afbeeldingsresultaat voor standing rock protest


For
months the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe, Oceti Sakowin headmen and
elders, other Indigenous peoples and other water protectors and
allies have been under siege while peacefully and prayerfully
resisting the DAPL.

The
pipeline was approved without environmental reviews, adequate
assessment of cultural properties and sacred sites, or the Free,
Prior and Informed Consent of the Standing Rock Sioux affirmed in the
UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

In
addition to violating sovereign Indigenous rights and
responsibilities, continued pipeline construction and any spills pose
significant and direct threats to sacred sites and water supplies for
the Standing Rock Sioux, who live less than a mile downstream, and
threaten direct harm to the Missouri River, which provides drinking
water to millions of people.1

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor standing rock protest

The
companies responsible for the pipeline are Energy Transfer Partners
(ETP) and Sunoco Logistics, who have a deplorable track record of
pipeline spills and total disregard for Tribal rights, land and
water.2

On
December 4, the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers denied the easement
needed to finish drilling under the Missouri River, saying it was
necessary to produce an Environmental Impact Statement and analyze
alternatives.3 Yet ETP insists that the companies “fully expect
to complete construction of the pipeline without any additional
rerouting.”4

This
could lead to banks financing an illegal activity. ETP and Sunoco are
rushing to build a pipeline that is economically unnecessary today,
and will become a stranded asset as the world moves away from
climate-destroying fuels.

If
DAPL does not deliver oil by January 1, shipper contracts will expire
and the project will be in jeopardy.5 The Morton County
Sheriff’s Department has violently repressed the water protectors in
service of the corporate desperation to meet this timeline. Given
further project delays as a result of the December 4 decision, that
January deadline won’t be met.

The
17 banks financing the DAPL project have not yet disbursed all the
loan funds they’ve committed. These banks now face a clear
opportunity to reconsider further funding a project steeped in
controversy and demonstrating material loss.

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor standing rock protest

Public
pressure is forcing DAPL’s lenders to confront the reality that
they are backing companies who are openly defying the rule of law,
undermining the regulatory process and authority of the U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers and setting a dangerous precedent. Now these
lenders must take a stand.

It
is time for these banks to cut their losses and for us to turn up the
heat.

Sign this petition to support the sovereignty and rights of Indigenouspeoples and hold DAPL banks accountable.

1http://standwithstandingrock.net/history/

2http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-pipeline-nativeamericans-safety-i-idUSKCN11T1UW
3
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/04/dakota-access-pipeline-permit-denied-standing-rock
4
http://www.businesswire.com/news/home/20161204005090/en/
5
http://ieefa.org/ieefa-report-dakota-access-pipeline-driven-high-risk-financing-overbuilt-region-little-known-economic-weaknesses-controversial-project

Zie ook: ‘North-Dakota Pipeline, grote schande voor Obama en de VS…….

       en: ‘Help het Sioux volk van Standing Rock in hun terechte (vreedzame) verzet tegen bodem- en watervervuiling…..

        en: ‘ING liegt dat het niet onder contract DAPL uit kan………

        en: ‘ING topman stelt dat ING zich niet kan terugtrekken uit DAPL….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Keystone XL pijpleiding heeft grote hoeveelheid olie gelekt, terwijl vreedzame demonstranten tegen de aanleg worden weggezet als terroristen……

       en: ‘The Dakota Access Pipeline Is Already Leaking

       en: ‘List of pipeline accidents in the United States in the 21st century‘ (stuitend!!)

       en: ‘VS overheden behandelden demonstranten tegen de DAPL als terroristen, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten…..

       en: ‘Grote banken moeten stoppen met het financieren van klimaatrampen en de rechten van de oorspronkelijke bevolking her en der respecteren!’

       en: ‘Grote banken overtreden eigen duurzaamheidsregels……..

       en:  ‘Help het Sioux volk van Standing Rock in hun terechte (vreedzame) verzet tegen bodem- en watervervuiling…..

       en: ‘Canada’s Standing Rock….. Stop de Site C Dam!

       en: ‘Regering Brits-Columbia liegt over olievervuiling…….‘ (zie ook de verdere links onder dat bericht)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘USACE’.

John Lennon 9 oktober 1940 – 8 december 1980 Power to the People!

Gisteren was het 36 jaar geleden dat John Lennon werd vermoord en zoals dit bij meerdere vooraanstaande personen in de VS het geval was, ook bij deze moord zijn grote vraagtekens te stellen.

Lennon was een groot denker, daar zal niemand met een gezond verstand nog aan twijfelen. Terecht stelt o.a.John W. Whitehead op Information Clearing House, dat de strijd die John Lennon tegen de instituties voerde, nog steeds actueel is en misschien wel meer actueel dan ooit tevoren…….

Hier het artikel van Whitehead (onder dit artikel kan u klikken voor een ‘Dutch’ vertaling) , daaronder nog een video van Brasscheck over deze zaak:

Power
to the People: John Lennon’s Legacy Lives On

By
John W. Whitehead

You
gotta remember, establishment,
it’s just a name for evil
. The monster doesn’t care whether
it kills all the students or whether there’s a revolution. It’s
not thinking logically, it’s out of control.”
– John
Lennon
 (1969)

December
08, 2016 “
Information
Clearing House

– Militant nonviolent resistance works.

Peaceful,
prolonged protests work.

Mass
movements with huge numbers of participants work.

Yes,
America, it is possible to use occupations and civil disobedience to
oppose government policies, counter injustice and bring about change
outside the confines of the ballot box.

It
has been done before. It is being done now. It can be done again.

For
example, in May of 1932, more than 43,000 people, dubbed the Bonus
Army—World War I veterans and their families—marched on
Washington. Out of work, destitute and with families to feed, more
than 10,000 veterans set up tent cities in the nation’s capital and
refused to leave until the government agreed to pay the bonuses they
had been promised as a reward for their services.

The
Senate voted against paying them immediately, but the protesters
didn’t budge. Congress adjourned for the summer, and still the
protesters remained encamped. Finally, on July 28, under orders from
President Herbert Hoover, the military descended with tanks and
cavalry and drove the protesters out, setting their makeshift camps
on fire. Still, the protesters returned the following year, and
eventually their efforts not only succeeded in securing payment of
the bonuses but contributed to the passage of the G.I. Bill of
Rights.


Similarly, the Civil Rights Movement mobilized hundreds of thousands
of people to strike at the core of an unjust and discriminatory
society. Likewise, while the 1960s anti-war movement began with a few
thousand perceived radicals, it ended with hundreds of thousands of
protesters, spanning all walks of life, demanding the end of American
military aggression abroad.

Most
recently, after months of protests over the construction of a
pipeline that members of the Sioux tribe insisted would harm their
water supply, 
the
Army Corp of Engineers has agreed to look for an alternate route for
the Dakota Access Pipeline
 to cross under Lake Oahe in North
Dakota.

This
kind of “power to the people” activism—grassroots, populist and
potent—is exactly the brand of civic engagement John Lennon
advocated throughout his career as a musician and anti-war activist.

It’s
been 36 years since Lennon was 
gunned
down by an assassin’s bullet
 on December 8, 1980, but his
legacy and the lessons he imparted in his music and his activism have
not diminished over the years.

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor john lennon

All
of the many complaints we have about government today—surveillance,
militarism, corruption, harassment, SWAT team raids, political
persecution, spying, overcriminalization, etc.—were present in
Lennon’s day and formed the basis of his call for social justice,
peace and a populist revolution.

Little
wonder, then, that the U.S. government saw him as enemy number one.


Because
he never refrained from speaking truth to power, Lennon became a
prime example of the lengths to which the U.S. government will go to
persecute those who dare to challenge its authority.

Lennon
was the subject of a four-year campaign of surveillance and
harassment by the U.S. government (spearheaded by FBI Director J.
Edgar Hoover), an attempt by President Richard Nixon to have him
“neutralized” and deported. As Adam Cohen of the 
New
York Times
 points
out, “The F.B.I.’s surveillance of

Lennon
is a reminder of how easily
domestic
spying can become unmoored from any legitimate law enforcement
purpose
. What is more surprising, and ultimately more unsettling,
is the degree to which the surveillance turns out to have been
intertwined with electoral politics.”

Years
after Lennon’s assassination, it would be revealed that the FBI had
collected 281 pages
of surveillance files
 on him. As the 
New
York Times
 notes,
“Critics of today’s domestic surveillance object largely on
privacy grounds. They have focused far less on how easily government
surveillance can become an instrument for the people in power to try
to hold on to power. ‘The U.S. vs. John Lennon’ … is the story
not only of one man being harassed, but of a democracy being
undermined.”

Such
government-directed harassment was nothing new.

The
FBI has had a long history of persecuting, prosecuting and generally
harassing activists, politicians, and cultural figures, most notably
among the latter such 
celebrated
names
 as folk singer Pete Seeger, painter Pablo Picasso,
comic actor and filmmaker Charlie Chaplin, comedian Lenny Bruce and
poet Allen Ginsberg. Among those most closely watched by the FBI was
Martin Luther King Jr., a man labeled by the FBI as “the most
dangerous and effective Negro leader in the country.”

In
Lennon’s case, the ex-Beatle had learned early on that rock music
could serve a political end by proclaiming a radical message. More
importantly, Lennon saw that his music could mobilize the public and
help to bring about change.

For
instance, in 1971 at a concert in Ann Arbor, Mich., Lennon took to
the stage and in his usual confrontational style belted out “John
Sinclair,” a song he had written about a man sentenced to 
10
years in prison for possessing two marijuana cigarettes
. Within
days of Lennon’s call for action, the Michigan Supreme Court
ordered Sinclair released.

While
Lennon believed in the power of the people, he also understood the
danger of a power-hungry government. “The trouble with government
as it is, is that it doesn’t represent the people,” observed
Lennon. “
It
controls them
.”

By
March 1971, when his “Power to the People” single was released,
it was clear where Lennon stood. Having moved to New York City that
same year, Lennon was ready to participate in political activism
against the U. S. government, the “monster” that was financing
the war in Vietnam.

The
release of Lennon’s 
Sometime
in New York City
 album,
which contained a radical anti-government message in virtually every
song and depicted President Richard Nixon and Chinese Chairman Mao
Tse-tung dancing together nude on the cover, only fanned the flames
of the conflict to come.

However,
the official U.S. war against Lennon began in earnest in 1972 after
rumors surfaced that Lennon planned to embark on a U.S. concert tour
that would combine rock music with antiwar organizing and voter
registration. Nixon, fearing Lennon’s influence on about 11 million
new voters (1972 was the first year that 18-year-olds could vote),
had the ex-Beatle served with deportation orders “in an 
effort
to silence him as a voice of the peace movement
.”

As
Lennon’s FBI file shows, memos and reports about the FBI’s
surveillance of the anti-war activist had been flying back and forth
between Hoover, the Nixon White House, various senators, the FBI and
the U.S. Immigration Office.

Nixon’s
pursuit of Lennon was relentless and misplaced.

Despite
the fact that Lennon was not plotting to bring down the Nixon
Administration, as the government feared, the government persisted in
its efforts to have him deported. Equally determined to resist,
Lennon dug in and fought back. Every time he was ordered out of the
country, his lawyers delayed the process by filing an appeal.

Finally,
in 1976, Lennon won the battle to stay in the country and by 1980, he
had re-emerged with a new album and plans to become politically
active again. The old radical was back and ready to cause trouble.

Unfortunately,
Lennon’s time as a troublemaker was short-lived.

Mark
David Chapman was waiting in the shadows
 on Dec. 8, 1980,
just as Lennon was returning to his New York apartment building.

As
Lennon stepped outside the car to greet the fans congregating
outside, Chapman, in an eerie echo of the FBI’s moniker for Lennon,
called out, “Mr. Lennon!”

Lennon
turned and was met with a barrage of gunfire as Chapman—dropping
into a two-handed combat stance—emptied his .38-caliber pistol and
pumped four hollow-point bullets into his back and left arm. Lennon
stumbled, staggered forward and, with blood pouring from his mouth
and chest, collapsed to the ground.

John
Lennon was pronounced dead on arrival at the hospital.

Much
like Martin Luther King Jr., John F. Kennedy, Malcolm X, Robert
Kennedy and others who have died attempting to challenge the
powers-that-be, Lennon had finally been “neutralized.”   

Still,
you can’t murder a movement with a bullet and a madman: Lennon’s
legacy lives on in his words, his music and his efforts to speak
truth to power.

As
Yoko Ono shared in a 2014 letter to the parole board tasked with
determining whether Chapman should be released: “A man of humble
origin, [John Lennon] brought light and hope to the whole world with
his words and music. He tried to be a 
good
power for the world
, and he was. He gave encouragement,
inspiration and dreams to people regardless of their race, creed and
gender.”

Lennon’s
work to change the world for the better is far from done.

Peace
remains out of reach. Activism and whistleblowers continue to be
prosecuted for challenging the government’s authority. Militarism
is on the rise, all the while the governmental war machine continues
to wreak havoc on innocent lives.

For
those of us who joined with John Lennon to imagine a world of peace,
it’s getting harder to reconcile that dream with the reality of the
American police state. And as I point out in my book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
,
those who do dare to speak up are labeled dissidents, troublemakers,
terrorists, lunatics, or mentally ill and tagged for surveillance,
censorship or, worse, involuntary detention.

As
Lennon shared in a 1968 interview:

I
think all our society is run by insane people for insane objectives…
I think we’re being run by maniacs for maniacal means. If anybody
can put on paper what our government and the American government and
the Russian… Chinese… what they are actually trying to do, and
what they think they’re doing, I’d be very pleased to know what
they think they’re doing. I think they’re all insane. But 
I’m
liable to be put away as insane for expressing that
. That’s
what’s insane about it.”

So
what’s the answer?

Lennon
had a multitude of suggestions.

If
everyone demanded peace instead of another television set, then
there’d be peace.”

Produce
your own dream. If you want to save Peru, go save Peru. It’s quite
possible to do anything, but not to put it on the leaders….You have
to do it yourself.”

Peace
is not something you wish for; It’s something you make, Something
you do, Something you are, And something you give away.”

If
you want peace, you won’t get it with violence.”

Say
you want a revolution / We better get on right away / Well you get on
your feet / And out on the street / Singing power to the people.”

And
my favorite advice of all: “All you need is love. Love is all you
need.”

Constitutional
attorney and author John W. Whitehead is founder and president of 
The
Rutherford Institute
.
His new book 
Battlefield
America: The War on the American People
 (SelectBooks,
2015) is available online at www.amazon.com. Whitehead can be
contacted at 
johnw@rutherford.org.

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

=============

Hier de video van Brasscheck TV:

The
mysterious death of John Lennon

When
John Lennon was shot and killed

the
news media went into “lone nut with

a
gun” mode.

They
left out the “lone nut with intelligence

connections,
endless financial resources,

and
obvious signs of having been brainwashed” part.

Here’s
the untold story.

 Zie ook: ‘Nam Kurt Cobain zijn eigen leven? Niet volgens een flink aantal mensen‘ (en de links onder dat bericht naar o.a. de moord op M.L. King en J.F. Kennedy)

Tot slot een link naar de YouTube pagina waar u naar muziek van Lennon kan luisteren.

Help het Sioux volk van Standing Rock in hun terechte (vreedzame) verzet tegen bodem- en watervervuiling…..

De mensen in Standing Rock hebben uw steun nodig! Lees en teken a.u.b. de petitie (van een paar dagen geleden), na het volgende artikel van The Guardian en geef deze petitie (en berichten) door aan familie, vrienden en bekenden:

Dakota
Access pipeline protester ‘may lose her arm’ after police standoff

Sophia
Wilansky, 21, was seriously injured after being hit by projectile
when officers threw less-than-lethal weapons at demonstrators, her
father said

Sophia Wilansky

A
21-year-old woman was severely injured and may lose her arm after
being hit by a projectile when North Dakota law enforcement officers
turned a water cannon on 
Dakota
Access pipeline
 protesters
and threw “less-than-lethal” weapons, according to the woman’s
father.

Sophia
Wilansky was one of several hundred protesters injured during the
standoff with police on Sunday on a bridge near the site where the
pipeline is planned to cross under the Missouri river.

Graphic
photographs of her injured arm with broken bones visible were
circulated on social media.

The
best-case scenario is no pain and 10-20% functionality,” said Wayne
Wilansky, Sophia’s father, who travelled to Minneapolis where his
daughter underwent eight hours of surgery on Monday. He said his
daughter had been hit by a concussion grenade thrown by a police
officer and that the arteries, median nerve, muscle and bone in her
left arm had been “blown away”. 

Sophia
will require additional surgery in the next few days and her arm may
still have to be amputated, he added. “She’s devastated. She
looks at her arm and she cries,” he said.

Sophia
Wilansky is one of thousands of activists who have travelled to the
Standing Rock Sioux reservation in 
North
Dakota
 to
attempt to halt the construction of the pipeline. Members of the

Standing
Rock Sioux tribe established a “spiritual camp” on the banks of
the Missouri in April. The tribe fears the pipeline will jeopardise
their water supply and say that construction has disturbed sacred
burial grounds.

Hier de link naar een video van 1,5 minuut:

Police
blast Standing Rock protesters with water cannon and rubber bullets

The
activists, who call themselves “water protectors”, have faced a
heavily militarised police force. More than 
400
protesters have been arrested
 by
law enforcement officers who have deployed pepper spray, teargas,
rubber bullets, Tasers, sound weapons and other “less-than-lethal”
methods.

Following
Sunday’s confrontation 
26
protesters were taken to hospital
 and
more than 300 injured, according to the Standing Rock Medic &
Healer Council. Most of the injured had hypothermia after being hit
by a water cannon in below-freezing weather.

The
Morton County sheriff’s department did not immediately respond to
inquiries from the Guardian. In an interview with the 
Los
Angeles Times
,
a spokeswoman for the department denied the agency had deployed
concussion grenades and suggested the injury may have occurred while
protesters were “rigging up their own explosives”.

The
Standing Rock Medic & Healer Council refuted law enforcement’s
claims in a statement, citing eye-witness accounts of seeing police
throw concussion grenades, “the lack of charring of flesh at the
wound site” and “grenade pieces that have been removed from her
arm in surgery and will be saved for legal proceedings”.

The
incident on Sunday began when about 100 activists attempted to remove
two burned trucks from the bridge just north of the main encampment.
The bridge has been barricaded for several weeks, blocking the most
direct route to Bismarck, North Dakota, and raising safety concerns
among residents of the camp and the reservation.

The
barricade may have exacerbated Wilansky’s injury, her father said,
by delaying her arrival at a hospital in Bismarck. She was
subsequently airlifted to another hospital in Minneapolis.

Wilansky
has received a massive outpouring of support online. A 
crowdfunding
campaign
 established
to help pay her medical bills raised more than $120,000 (£96,000)
from more than 4,000 donors in the first seven hours. 

Friends
of Wilansky are planning a prayer vigil in Minneapolis on Tuesday.

  • This
    article was amended on 21 November 2016 to clarify that Sophia
    Wilansky’s father told the Guardian that she was injured by a
    projectile, which North Dakota law enforcement denies.

===============

 As
Thanksgiving approaches, 
more
than 100 Native Americans and their allies have just been attacked
and injured by police in a new assault using rubber bullets, tear
gas, mace canisters and water cannons in freezing
temperature.

Videos
show police spraying people with cold water in freezing weather
 which
has led to mass hypothermia.
This
is an emergency. 
Please
sign the petition that is helping us bring attention to these
outrages.

Please
call the phone numbers 
on
the page following the petition to demand a halt to this
injustice.
Our
petition to 
President
Barack Obama, North Dakota Governor Jack Dalrymple, the Morton County
Sheriff’s Department, and the Army Corps of Engineers
,
reads:

Regarding
Standing Rock, we urge you to remove the National Guard. Halt the
provision of war weapons and war training to police departments.
Demilitarize police actions at Standing Rock. Send Department of
Justice observers. Deny the Army Corps of Engineers’ permit for the
Dakota Access Pipeline.
Click
here to demand justice.
Let’s
not forget that the courageous water protectors at Standing Rock
are 
protecting
the climate of the earth
 we
all need to live on.
Signing
our names on
 to
amplify their voices is the least we can do.
After
signing the petition, 
please
use the tools on the next webpage to share it with your friends and
to make important phone calls
.This
work is only possible with your financial support. 
Please
chip in $3 now.
 
The RootsAction.org Team
P.S.
RootsAction is an independent online force endorsed by Jim Hightower,
Barbara Ehrenreich, Cornel West, Daniel Ellsberg, Glenn Greenwald,
Naomi Klein, Bill Fletcher Jr., Laura Flanders, former U.S. Senator
James Abourezk, Coleen Rowley, Frances Fox Piven, Lila Garrett, Phil
Donahue, Sonali Kolhatkar, and many others.
Background:TYT
Politics:
 Barbaric
Dakota Access Oil Police Cause Mass Hypothermia 
Democracy
Now:
 Standing
Rock: 100+ Injured After Police Attack with Water Cannons, Rubber
Bullets & Mace

Associated
Press:
 Police,
Protesters Face off at Dakota Access Pipeline

============

Hier nog twee video’s en teksten van Brasscheck TV:


The
full truth about the Dakota pipeline
 

On
this day where we supposedly give thanks for the Native Americans who
saved the Pilgrims from freezing and starving to death…

Let’s
get some things straight about the Dakota pipeline:

1.
The entire project is based o fraudulent permitting and Obama can
shut it down with the stroke of a pen.

2.
This pipeline was deemed “too dangerous” to run nearby
Bismarck so it was moved 
to
this area where it threatens the only fresh water supply in the
region.

3.
The entire Missouri River is put at risk by this poorly conceived
project.

4.
This pipeline is only economically because the 40+ year LAW
forbidding 
the
export of oil from the US was recently overturned.

5.
We are trading the future of our fresh water supply for the chance
for a few billionaires 
to
make a killing by exporting US energy reserves that we should be
retaining for ourselves.

Please
share this widely so your friends, family and colleagues understand
what’s at stake 
and
support the heroic effort thousands are making to stop it.

No water, no life and what’s at stake in North Dakota

No water, no life.

It’s a simple formula.

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. explains simple facts the mainstream news media won’t share
with you in a million years.

For example, did you now that Trump owns a $2 million stake in the pipeline?

Did you know this pipeline project is violating many existing laws and could be shut down with the stroke of a pen?

===========

Welcome
to the police state

North Dakota…Oil
companies want to put a pipeline under the Missouri River.

The
people who live there want to stop it.

And
out come the head crackers in blue.

Obama’s
comment: “We’re going to let it ride.”

===========

Alsof het gvd niet genoeg is, dat de VS de grootste genocide ooit heeft gepleegd op de rechtmatige bewoners, van wat nu de VS heet………..

Het is duidelijk, dat de politie door het inzetten van waterkanonnen in de kou, de bevolking martelt, dezelfde bevolking, die het zou moeten beschermen (ook tegen bodem- en watervervuiling!!), 

Zie ook: ‘North-Dakota Pipeline, grote schande voor Obama en de VS…….

        en: ‘Canada’s Standing Rock….. Stop de Site C Dam!

        en: ‘ING financiert de Dakota Access Pipeline, die het leefgebied van het Sioux volk bedreigt……….

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

North-Dakota Pipeline, grote schande voor Obama en de VS…….

A sinds april van dit jaar demonstreren de oorspronkelijk bewoners van verschillende volken in de VS op een vreedzame manier, tegen de aanleg van de ‘North-Dakota Pipeline’. Nadat ze begin vorige week, met zwaar geweld* werden verdreven van hun plek van protest, staan ze nu aan de oever van de Missouri, voor deze bewoners precies als de grond, heilig……. De pijpleiding wordt onder de rivier doorgetrokken, het is niet de vraag of daar ongelukken mee zullen gebeuren, maar wanneer, aldus deskundigen, een ramp waarmee het leefmilieu in deze rivier keihard zal worden getroffen en dat voor lange tijd……

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor north dakota pipeline

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor north dakota pipeline

Gisteren kreeg ik een video (12,3 minuten) van Brasscheck TV over deze zaak, met het volgende bijschrift:

Welcome
to the police state

North
Dakota…Oil companies want to put a pipeline under the Missouri
River.

The
people who live there want to stop it.

.
And
out come the head crackers in blue.

Obama’s
comment: “We’re going to let it ride.”

              News
from the pipeline

Hired
thugs attack peaceful protesters

Alsof de grootste genocide ooit niet genoeg is geweest, de genocide op de oorspronkelijke bevolking van de VS, een genocide gepleegd door de voorvaderen van de huidige machthebbers en een ‘aardig’ deel van de bevolking……………

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor north dakota pipeline


Weet u nog, alle mooie woorden van Obama over het milieu en de klimaatverandering (en niet alleen tijdens de klimaattop in Parijs…)…..



* Geweld tegen vreedzame demonstranten met o.a. de inzet van politiehonden, traangas, pepperspray, wapenstok, tasers en rubberkogels. In de gevangenis worden de arrestanten mishandeld, wat tot protesten in heel de VS heeft geleid……. Zoals u uit de tekst van Brasscheck kon lezen: de autoriteiten hebben nu tuig ingehuurd, die de demonstranten met geweld moeten intimideren…… Overigens hebben de autoriteiten toestemming van de gouverneur van Noord-Dakota gekregen om met scherp op de demonstranten te schieten…….

Zie ook: ‘Help het Sioux volk van Standing Rock in hun terechte (vreedzame) verzet tegen bodem- en watervervuiling…..

         en: ‘Canada’s Standing Rock….. Stop de Site C Dam!

        en: ‘ING financiert de Dakota Access Pipeline, die het leefgebied van het Sioux volk bedreigt……….

       en: ‘Regering Brits-Columbia liegt over olievervuiling…….‘ (zie ook de verdere links onder dat bericht)

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Noord-Dakota’.