Hawaï: grondwater wordt bedreigd door ‘versleten’ mega tanks brandstof van VS leger

Het
grootste gevaar voor Hawaï
 komt niet van Noord-Koreaanse ‘kernraketten’, maar van het
VS leger dat daar met enorme aantallen militairen is gestationeerd. 75 jaar
geleden werden er enorme ondergrondse brandstoftanks geconstrueerd op
het eiland Oahu en zoals te verwachten was, door corrosie dreigen die
tanks lek te raken…… 

Eerder
gebeurde dit op een Californische luchtmachtbasis, waarna de tanks
werden vervangen door nieuwe, lullig genoeg moest daar eerst 1,5
miljoen gallons aan brandstof voor weglekken…….. (een gallon is
iets meer dan 3,7854 liter ofwel het gaat hier om meer dan 5,5
miljoen liter brandstof…..)

Echter ook op Oahu is in 2014 een hoeveelheid van 27.000 gallons aan brandstof weggelekt…… Intussen worden er al sporen van petroleum gevonden in het drinkwater, wat volgens de autoriteiten geen gevaar vormt voor de volksgezondheid……..* De tanks liggen op een zeer korte afstand van het zich daaronder bevindende drinkwater….

Niet
vreemd dus dat de bevolking van Hawaï en zeker van het eiland Oahu
eist dat het leger van de VS actie onderneemt, voordat de drinkwatervoorraad van Oahu voorgoed is verpest………

In
het volgende artikel van Ann Wright, eerder verschenen op CommonDreams en door mij overgenomen van Greed, beschrijft ze naast het
risico die de brandstoftanks vormen, o.a. de situatie op Hawaï waar zoals gezegd een enorm aantal militairen is gelegerd.

IS
THE U.S. MILITARY A LARGER THREAT TO HAWAII THAN NORTH KOREAN
MISSILES?

FEBRUARY
10, 2019
 FRIENDS
OF GREED 3
CDDRINKING
WATER
HAWAIIUS
MILITARY

Us Military Base in Oahu, Hawaii ( Photo: MilitaryBases.com)

United
States (
CD)
– 
After
the big North Korean missile scare in Hawaii a year ago, one would
think that missiles are the greatest threat to the island of Oahu.
Yet, it’s not missiles that are the threat, it’s our own U.S.
military and its massive jet fuel storage tanks that are leaking into
Oahu’s drinking water aquifer.

A
complex of mammoth 20-story military jet fuel storage tanks buried
twenty stories down in a bluff called Red Hill are perched only 100
feet above Honolulu’s water supply.  The walls on the
75-year-old jet fuel tanks are now so thin that the edge of a dime is
thicker.  Each of the twenty tanks holds 12.5 million gallons of
jet fuel, although eighteen are in operation now.  225,000,000
gallons of jet fuel in total are a mere 100 feet from 
causing a
catastrophic disaster for the island of Oahu.

In
fact, disaster has already struck when in 2014, 27,000 gallons of jet
fuel leaked from a tank that had been repaired with a welded patch. 
The welding gave way and tens of thousands of gallons of fuel leaked
into the water supply.  Over the years, studies have documented
leaks dating back to 1947, the continued corrosion of the tank liners
and the risk of a catastrophic fuel release.

Drinking
water is currently safe to drink, but traces of petroleum chemicals
are being 
detected in
the groundwater near the tanks.

Concerned
citizens on the island, have for decades been trying to get the U.S.
Navy to take the dangerous tanks out of Red Hill.  The military
states that the underground fuel tanks are of strategic importance to
U.S. national security and they are being maintained as good as
75-year old tanks can be. Yet, those who live on Oahu say: “That’s
not good enough! You can’t have national security by jeopardizing
the health security of your citizens.”

It
is not surprising that the U.S. Navy has made little effort to remove
the tanks and put replacements in a less dangerous place.  The
military’s hold on the island of Oahu and its politicians is very
strong both psychologically and economically. Oahu is filled with
U.S. military bases and their accompanying corporations that supply
the military with equipment and services.

The
state of Hawaii is one of the most militarized states in the nation
and Oahu is one of the most militarized islands with seven major U.S.
military bases and a 
total of
36,620 military personnel:  Army 16,313, Navy 7,792 (drop
of 8,000 from 2015), Marines 6,370 and Air Force 4,937,
Coast Guard 1208.

When
the 64,000 military family members and military 
contractors are
added to the active duty military, the military-industrial complex on
Oahu numbers about 100,000, which is 10 percent of Oahu’s total
population of 988,000. The state of Hawaii has only
1.4
million citizens.

The
U.S. military installations on the island of Oahu began being
constructed soon after the overthrow of the sovereign nation of
Hawaii by U.S. businessmen and a small contingent of U.S. Marines:

Pearl
Harbor Naval Base- headquarters of the US Pacific Fleet Navy and is
the 
homeport for
25 warships,15 attack submarines, nine guided-missile destroyers and
a guided-missile cruiser;

Hickam
Air Force Base- headquarters of the US Pacific Air Forces and
has 
squadrons of
F-15s, F22, C-17 and B-2 bombers;

Kaneohe
Marine Base- Marine Air Station and three Marine 
Regiments

Schofield
Barracks- 25th
Infantry
Division

And
the Tropic Regions 
Test
Center
 (TRTC)

Camp
Smith
-headquarters
of the United Indo-Pacific Command which is 
responsible for
all U.S. military activity in the greater Asia and Pacific region
including India, Camp Smith is also the headquarters of the U.S.
Marine Corps Forces, Pacific.

Fort
Shafter-
headquarters for
the U.S. Army Pacific

Asia-Pacific
Center
 for
Security Studies-military educational facility for military and
civilian officials from countries from Asia and the Pacific for
courses on international security strategy.

Tripler
Army Medical Center
 and
Veterans Administration Medical Center-provides medical assistance to
active duty military and veterans.


U.S.
Coast Guard 14th District for the Pacific (while not part of the
Department of Defense-, during wartime, the Coast Guard can go under
command of DOD)- three 225-foot buoy tenders, four 110-foot patrol
boats, two 87-foot coastal patrol boats, four small boat stations,
two sector commands, an air station, a Far East command, five
detachments and over 400 aids to navigation.

Major
military installations have been built on other islands of Hawaii.
The 
Puhakaloa
Training Area
,
the largest U.S. military training area in the world with 133,000
acres for artillery, mortar, small arms and crew-served weapons
firing is located on the Big Island of Hawaii.  U.S. Air Force
bombers flying from the continental U.S. drop ordnance on the area
between the two volcanoes of the island of Hawaii.

On
the island of Kauai, the Pacific Missile Range Facility Barking Sands
(PMRF) is the world’s largest range capable of supporting surface,
submarines, aircraft, and space operations simultaneously. PMRF has
over 1,100 square miles of instrumented underwater range and over
42,000 square miles of controlled airspace.  The Navy is
currently using PMRF to test “hit to kill” technology using
direct collision of the anti-ballistic missile with its target
destroying the target by using only kinetic energy from the
force of the collision. The Navy’s Aegis Ballistic 
Missile
Defense System 
and
the Army’s Terminal High Altitude Area Defense System, or
THAAD are tested on Kauai at PMRF.

On
the island of Maui, the Maui High-Performance Computing Center,
a Department of Defense Supercomputing Resource Center managed by the
Air Force Research Laboratory and supporting the High-Performance
Computing Modernization Program, provided DoD scientists and
engineers with one of the world’s largest computers to solve
war-making computational problems.

According
to the Hawaii Chamber of Commerce, the economic direct and indirect
impacts of military expenditures in Hawaii generate $14.7 billion
into Hawaii’s economy, creating more than 102,000 jobs. The
military’s investments in Hawaii totals $8.8 billion. Military
procurement contracts amount to about $2.3 billion annually, making
it a prime source of contracting opportunities for hundreds of
Hawaii’s small businesses, including significant military
construction projects.

The
power of the U.S. military on issues in the Hawaiian Islands and its
politicians at all levels cannot be underestimated, nor can the
protection the military is given by its retirees and the citizens who
benefit from it. The pressure on city and state officials to accept
the status quo is very strong.

Finally,
the U.S. government has acknowledged the medical problems the
contamination of the drinking supply caused at another community- the
huge U.S. Marine Base at Camp Lejeune, North Carolina and Marine
Corps Air Station (MCAS) New River, North Carolina.  From 1953
through 1987, tens of thousands of Marines and their families were
contaminated by two on-base water wells that were contaminated with
trichloroethylene (TCE), perchloroethylene (PCE), benzene, vinyl
chloride among other 
compounds from
on-base leaking storage tanks and an off-base dry cleaner.

At
long last, the Veterans Administration has acknowledged the dangerous
situation on the bases in North Carolina that was ignored for
decades.  The VA has declared that a large number of diseases
are caused by the chemicals and that military and family members who
have contracted these diseases and who are still living will be
compensated.  We can expect the same type of diseases with the
continuing leaks at Red Hill:

  • Aplastic
    anemia and other myelodysplastic syndromes

  • Bladder
    cancer

  • Breast
    cancer

  • Esophageal
    cancer

  • Female
    infertility

  • Hepatic
    steatosis

  • Kidney
    cancer

  • Leukemia

  • Lung
    cancer

  • Miscarriage

  • Multiple
    myeloma

  • Myelodysplastic
    syndromes

  • Neurobehavioral
    effects

  • Non-Hodgkin’s
    lymphoma

  • Renal
    toxicity

  • Scleroderma

  • Parkinson’s
    Disease

On
the other side of the country from North Carolina, the Navy has
already closed down one complex of underground jet fuel storage tanks
at Point Loma, California, which had 54 storage tanks.  The
riveted seams on the underground tanks began leaking as they aged. 
When 1.5 million gallons of fuel spilled from the site in 2006, the
U.S. Navy was decided to replace the tanks.

For
us on Oahu, the bottom line is that when, not if, the massive jet
fuel storage tanks leak into the aquifer of Honolulu, city, state and
federal officials must be held accountable– the public has given
them plenty of warning of their concerns.  As with lead in the
water supply in Flint, Michigan lead, officials knew that the
drinking water was contaminated but didn’t do anything to stop the
community from using it. Remarkably, none of the Flint officials have
gone to jail yet, but the community is demanding accountability for
malfeasance in office—which would be the same in Honolulu when
disaster strikes on the jet fuel storage tanks.

So,
we the citizens ask our elected leaders, why do they allow such a
disaster continue to threaten our water supply in Honolulu when we
know that 75-year-old tanks with corroding walls are continuing to
leak.

I
will make this personal.

I
am 72 years old and served 29 years in the U.S. military. I retired
20 years ago.  The twenty jet fuel storage tanks are 75 years
old and have served each of those 75 years and are still serving.

At
72, I have had the normal number of aches and pains including a hip
replacement that didn’t turn out the best and skin cancer surgery
that left skin grafts and patches on my face, head and leg.

At
75, the twenty-story jet fuel storage tanks also have had aches and
pains as well as their skin getting thinner and thinner due to seven
decades of corrosion.   Their skin or walls are as thin as
the edge of a dime in some places.  Patching of the thin skin of
the Red Hill jet fuel tanks didn’t turn out so well either, with
the welding on one of the patches giving way in 2014 and 27,000
gallons of jet fuel leaking out of the tanks jeopardizing the
Honolulu aquifer.

Those
of us in our 70s, whether we are fuel tanks or humans, know all about
leaks—it’s a hazard of age.

I
retired from the U.S. Army after 29 years of service.  After 75
years of service, it’s time to retire the leaking Red Hill Storage
tanks—and protect our precious water supply.

This
report prepared by 
Ann
Wright
 for Common
Dreams
 under
Creative
Commons License

Ann Wright Ann
Wright
 is
a 29 year US Army/Army Reserves veteran who retired as a Colonel and
a former US diplomat who resigned in March, 2003 in opposition to the
war on Iraq.  She served in Nicaragua, Grenada, Somalia,
Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Sierra Leone, Micronesia and Mongolia. 
In December, 2001 she was on the small team that reopened the US
Embassy in Kabul, Afghanistan.  She is the co-author of the
book 
“Dissent:
Voices of Conscience.”
 
(www.voicesofconscience.com


============================================

* Het cliché ‘geen gevaar voor de volksgezondheid’, een cliché dat keer op keer wordt gebruikt door autoriteiten, terwijl dit cliché voor zoveel soorten van chemische stoffen wordt gebruikt, dat men uit het oog verliest dat al die beetjes chemische stoffen, die ‘geen gevaar voor de volksgezondheid zouden vormen’, zich stapelen in ons lichaam en op den duur uiteraard wel een groot gevaar vormen voor de volksgezondheid…….. (neem alle gifsoorten op groente en fruit, gifstoffen in kadaver uh vlees en al het gif dat je uit de buitenlucht in je lichaam opslaat….) Kortom dat ‘geen gevaar voor de volksgezondheid’ is een dooddoener, terwijl er wel degelijk een bestaand groot gevaar is voor die gezondheid…….. (maar ja, probeer maar eens te bewijzen door welke chemische stoffen zich kanker heeft ontwikkeld in je lichaam…..)

PS: overigens totaal belachelijk dat Hawaï een staat van de VS is!

VS zet definitief in op oorlog met Rusland en VS ambassadeur Hoekstra wil dat Nederland Rusland hard aanpakt v.w. MH17

Waarschijnlijk
om het volk te laten zien dat hij niets met Rusland heeft en zelfs
geneigd is Rusland aan te vallen, heeft psychopaat Trump, samen met
zijn militaire adviseurs (die hij bijna continu rond zich heeft)
besloten een raketsysteem in Duitsland te stationeren, zodat de VS
niet alleen raketten heeft in Roemenië en Polen…….

De
raketten die in Roemenië en Polen staan maken zogenaamd onderdeel uit
van een raketschild tegen Iran, echter deze raketten staan zo dicht op
de Russische grens, dat Rusland moeite zal hebben ze te
onderscheppen, mocht de VS ze op Rusland afschieten……. 

Je dacht waarschijnlijk dat het hier alleen gaat om antiraketsystemen, echter dat is maar ten dele waar,
deze raketten kunnen in een mum van tijd van (nucleaire) kernkoppen
worden voorzien en dan (uiteraard) als aanvalsraketten worden
ingezet……. Het zou me verbazen als de raketten in Polen en Roemenië al niet zijn uitgerust met kernkoppen….

Mensen,
dat was het nog niet, generaal Scaparrotti heeft ook weer van zich
laten horen en hij stelt dat er veel meer troepen naar Europa moeten,
zelfs troepen die (zogenaamd) terreur bestrijden in het Midden-Oosten, zouden in Europa moeten worden gestationeerd, aldus de oorlogshitser en grootlobbyist van het militair-industrieel complex…..

Ach
ja, de VS heeft ‘slechts’ 60.000 militairen in Europa, althans als
dat er intussen al niet veel meer zijn, immers het Pentagon heeft
carte blanche gekregen van Trump voor het naar eigen inzicht opvoeren
van troepensterkte…… Daarnaast heeft de VS meer dan 300 militaire bases rond een groot deel van Rusland en China……

Oplichter
Scaparrotti stelt dat die troepen nodig zijn om de Russen het hoofd te
bieden, echter van Russische agressie in Europa is geen sprake,
althans als je de leugens van de NAVO, de meeste EU politici en de
reguliere media niet meerekent, geteisem dat de leugens volhoudt dat
De Krim is geannexeerd en dat de Russen in Oost-Oekraïne
zitten…….

De
werkelijke agressor is de VS, dat de NAVO tegen de grens van Rusland
heeft gedrukt, dit is tegen de begin 90er jaren gemaakte afspraken met Sovjet-president Gorbatsjov……. De opstand die in Kiev startte was
voorbereid en werd geregisseerd door de VS, die daarna de Porosjenko
junta installeerde…… Hillary Clinton, destijds minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, is hier één op één verantwoordelijk voor, de hele ‘grap’ (een
enorme oorlogsmisdaad!) heeft de VS maar liefst 4 miljard dollar
gekost…..

Het
is dan ook overduidelijk dat de VS van zins is Rusland aan te vallen,
dan wel de spanningen dermate hoog op te schroeven dat het
militair-industrieel complex op volle toeren kan gaan draaien……
Tja er kan altijd nog een ferme schep bovenop, nietwaar?

Daarover gesproken, de VS ‘ambassadeur’ in ons land, Pete Hoekstra liet bij BNR weten (o.a. in het nieuws van 7.30 u. vanmorgen) dat Nederland zich agressiever moet opstellen tegenover Rusland, dit n.a.v. het neerhalen van vlucht MH17….. Nederland moet zich in de EU harder opstellen en pleiten voor zwaardere sancties tegen Rusland, daarbij verwacht Hoekstra dat de VS Nederland zal steunen….. Nog een uitspraak van Hoekstra, daar komt ‘ie: Nederland moet zorgen dat het North Stream (NS2) project, een pijpleiding vanuit Rusland naar Duitsland (en Nederland) wordt afgeblazen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Met dat laatste komt de aap uit de mouw: zodat de EU zich afhankelijk maakt van het zwaar gesubsidieerde en voor ons peperdure (LNG) gas uit de VS, gas dat veelal is verkregen uit schaliegaswinning, ofwel gas dat middels enorme milieuschade is gewonnen en middels smerige tankertransporten over de Atlantische Oceaan naar de EU wordt vervoerd…….. Wat een vuile oplichter die Hoekstra!! 

Het eerste artikel hieronder is van Tyler Durden en werd o.a. gepubliceerd op
Anti-Media en Zero Hedge. Het tweede artikel is een korte inleiding
op een video van het Ron Paul Liberty Rapport (zien mensen!):

US
Military Set to Deploy Powerful Anti-Missile Shield in Germany

June
3, 2018 at 10:11 am

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE— The
United States is looking to establish a powerful missile shield in
Germany in a potential move that would further inflame tensions with
both Moscow and Tehran.

Though
NATO has long insisted that its missile defense systems are not
directed at Russia, the Kremlin has repeatedly condemned what it sees
as 
NATO
encroachment in Eastern Europe
,
especially after countries like Romania — which is not engaged
in any ongoing conflict with Russia — have 
recently
installed
 their
own US-supplied ballistic missile systems, with renewed 
multi-billion
dollar Patriot missile expansions to follow
.

Screenshot
from a U.S.-Germany Anti-Air Missile Live-Fire Exercise In Greece,
November 2017

And
former Warsaw Pact turned NATO member Poland in late 2017 struck
$10.5
billion missile defense deal with the US
.
Also supposedly neutral non-NATO Sweden, which lies close to Russia’s
western and northern borders, last year 
inked
a $1 billion deal with the US
 for
the advanced Patriot surface-to-air missile defense system.

So
what are now 
reported as preliminary
US military and German discussions about boosting European defenses
with the proposed Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD)
system
 in
Germany will no doubt be interpreted as more of the same unnecessary
expansive NATO spending and encroachment on Russia’s borders.

The
talks further come as Europe and the US are at odds over the fate of
the Iran nuclear agreement, with Washington threatening severe
economic punishment for those countries trying to stick it out
through opening trade and energy ties with Iran.

Close
US Middle East ally Saudi Arabia, for example, shocked the world when
news emerged last week that it has 
ceased
awarding government contracts to German companies
 over
anger at both Germany staying by the Obama-brokered JCPOA and recent
criticism of Saudi meddling in Lebanese politics by German officials.

The
Pentagon has denied plans to install the advanced THAAD system in
Germany; however, 
Reuters reports that
US European Command is pushing it in the wake of the White House
pullout from the Iran nuclear deal:

U.S.
European Command has been pushing for a THAAD system in Europe for
years, but 
the
U.S. withdrawal from the Iran nuclear accord has added urgency to the
issue
,
said Riki Ellison, head of the non-profit Missile Defense Advocacy
Alliance.

A
senior German military official cited the need to add more radars
across Europe
 to
better track and monitor potential threats, and cue interceptors if
needed.

For
Pentagon planners, it is Iran’s 
Shahab
3 ballistic missiles
 that
are of most concern in terms of European threat assessment, as they
currently have 
a
range of 2,000 kilometers, enough to reach southern Europe.

Iran
has considered increasing the range which it is said to be
technologically capable of, but reportedly saw no strategic need in
the wake of the 2015 nuclear agreement, which is now hanging by a
thread.

Iran’s
Shahab 3 might possibly reach southern Europe. Via the AFP.

It
appears German military leaders may be 
capitalizing
on current US fear-mongering related to the “Iran threat” pushed
by the White House
:
“Deploying another U.S. defensive system to Europe 
could
reassure NATO allies in southern Europe already within striking range
of Iran’s missiles
,
said one military official from that region,” according to 
Reuters,
which further quoted a second source as saying “German
officials were open to the move as a way to better protect civilian
populations.”

As Reuters reports
further, the proposed German THAAD system is set for Pentagon review,
so we could get news of what would be another multi-billion dollar
defense deal for the heart of Europe 
by
the end of summer
:

The
issue may be raised in a new Pentagon missile defense review expected
in early June. The review may draw a closer connection between
missile defense and 
a
need to deter Russia that was highlighted in the new U.S. national
defense strategy
,
said Tom Karako, senior fellow at the Center for Strategic and
International Studies (CSIS).

One
proposed site for the THAAD system is Ramstein Air Force Base, home
to the headquarters for the U.S. Air Force in Europe and NATO Allied
Air Command.

Meanwhile,
the THAAD system is built by… 
who
else?… you guessed it…
 Lockheed
Martin Corp with a powerful Raytheon Co AN/TPY-2 radar
,
to shootdown short-, medium-, and intermediate-range ballistic
missiles” — and both  companies are looking to catch
the multi-billion dollar windfall.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

US
Commander in Europe: We Need More Troops to Fight The Russians

Ron
Paul and Daniel McAdams
May
30, 2018

US
Commander of the Europe Command, Gen. Curtis M. Scaparrotti, has
called for thousands more US troops to “deter Russian aggression”
in Europe.

He
has even suggested that the US troops should be pulled off of
counter-terrorism duty and sent to Europe. Meanwhile, the Pentagon
announced a massive shipment of military equipment to Europe,
including tanks and other tracked vehicles. Do US military officials
really believe that Russia is about to invade western Europe? Are we
back in the 1940s?

Or
is Washington’s military-industrial complex looking for new ways to
justify an ever-expanding military budget? Tune in to today’s Ron
Paul Liberty Report:

=============================

Zie ook: ‘Stop militaire transporten van de VS en NAVO richting Russische grens >> niet nog een wereldoorlog!

Voor berichten over MH17, klik op dat label, direct onder dit bericht.