Theresa May overtreft Donald Trump in slechtheid…!!!

The Canary bracht gisteren een artikel met de titel ‘Three things Theresa May has forced on Britain that make her scarier than Donald Trump’.

The Canary heeft wat veren laten vallen, daar het o.a. op de proppen komt met ‘The Investigatory Act’, een ‘wet’ waarmee de Britse overheid in alle persoonlijke gegevens mag peuren en alle browsegegevens mag inzien, waarbij die wet internetaanbieders verplicht, een jaar lang de hele internetgeschiedenis van iedereen op te slaan en toegankelijk te maken voor diverse overheidsinstanties………

Volgens The Canary heeft het beest Trump een dergelijke wet nog niet ingevoerd, beetje suf, daar de VS een dergelijke wet al heeft, met het oppoetsen van een ouder wet door ‘change-vredesduif’ Obama….. In 2015 werd in de VS bekend gemaakt, dat middels oudere wetgeving in de hand, het wissen van de browsegeschiedenis (of: browsergeschiedenis, wat u wilt) een misdrijf is…….. Via de meer dan fascistoïde Patriot Act heeft de overheid in de VS al toegang tot ieders computer (zelfs buiten de VS, zoals zelfs de Duitse premier Merkel moest ontdekken……*)

Buiten dit feit, blijft het uiteraard een schandaal, dat ‘een democratische regering’ als de inhumane neoliberale regering May in Groot-Brittannië, een dergelijke wet invoert.

Voorts voert The Canary (in een verder uitstekend artikel) o.a. nog aan, dat May op Franse bodem al een betonnen muur van 4 meter hoog en een kilometer lang heeft laten bouwen, dit om vluchtelingen buiten GB te houden, ‘The Calais Wall’, zoals men die muur in GB noemt…….

Ook heeft de Britse regering wagens laten rondrijden met de tekst dat je gearresteerd zal worden, als je illegaal in Groot-Brittannië bent en je daarom als ‘illegaal’ zijnde, beter kan vertrekken….. Nadat hier ophef over ontstond en May haar ‘excuus’ moest aanbieden, werd de inzet van de Britse douane ‘iets fanatieker’ (en gewelddadig), dan eerder…….

Hier het artikel:



Three
things Theresa May has forced on Britain that make her scarier than
Donald Trump
[EDITORIAL]

Three things Theresa May has forced on Britain that make her scarier than Donald Trump [EDITORIAL]

The
increasingly belligerent and authoritarian actions of the Trump White
House are (rightly) spreading concern across the world. But if
we want to know where the wannabe dictator is looking for tips, look
no further than 10 Downing Street. Theresa May – as Home Secretary
and Prime Minister – has pushed Britain way further down the road
to authoritarianism than Trump has yet succeeded in doing in the
US.

The
Investigatory Powers Act

The
above act 
received Royal
Assent on 29 November 2016. And it made Britain the most
advanced surveillance state in the democratic world.
It 
gives the
government unrestricted access to everyone’s personal information
and internet browsing history.

Internet
Service Providers must now store details of everything you do online
for a year, and make it available to dozens of public agencies. This
gives authorities unprecedented access to our online lives: our
interests, our networks of friends, family and colleagues, our sexual
interests, our religious and political views, our medical history,
right down to the basic pattern of our daily life.

And
as a recent Amnesty International 
report
[pdf, p35]
 points
out, the government ignored most criticisms and recommendations made
about the bill:

Despite
the sweeping powers in the Investigatory Powers Act that threaten to
violate the human rights of people inside and outside the UK, the
bill was pushed through parliament by the government, which ignored
criticism from parliamentary committees, the telecommunications
industry and civil society, including the UN’s privacy chief, who
had warned that the bill violated the right to privacy and ran
contrary to recent Europe Court of Human Rights jurisprudence.

This
leaves the government and its agencies with the power to surveil
almost everything citizens do online. And all without the need for a
warrant or cause for suspicion. As NSA whistleblower Edward Snowden
put it:

Edward Snowden 

@Snowden

The UK has just legalized the most extreme surveillance in the history of western democracy. It goes farther than many autocracies. https://twitter.com/mattburgess1/status/798948884433276928 

The
Calais Wall

Donald
Trump’s border wall with Mexico remains, at least for now, a flight
of Trumpian fancy. But Theresa May has already built her Great Wall
of Calais to keep refugees out of Britain. In fact, how the fiasco
has remained so quiet is a testament to the blunt-toothed
non-response of much of the UK press.

The wall is
a four-metre-high, 1km-long concrete barrier – built to separate
the ‘Calais Jungle’ refugee camp from passing freight lorries. It
was designed to prevent desperate refugees making their way to
Britain by leaping onto passing traffic. Britain funded the wall, at
a cost of 
£2.3m to
the taxpayer. The wall was completed last December, two
months 
after authorities
had driven refugees out of the camp and burned it to the ground.

As
Matt Broomfield 
writes in
a searing comment piece for 
The
Independent
:

A
multi-million wall built to separate the Calais Jungle from
passing trucks has finally been completed, two months after the camp
was bulldozed and its thousands of refugee residents scattered around
France.

The
British-funded wall cost £2.3m. That’s more
expensive than the modern, wood-shelter camp which houses
2,500
refugees in nearby Dunkirk, or enough to house and support nearly 300
Syrian refugees in Britain for a year.

Beste bezoeker, hier had een video moeten staan, maar deze is door YouTube verwijderd; tja de waarheid is vervelend voor de machthebbers, die o.a YouTube maar al te graag bevriend houdt, kijk als het nou een video van een jonge meid was, de tegen haar zin was geplaatst, was het een ander verhaal geweest…………

Theresa
May and the racist vans

But
it was as Home Secretary that Theresa May’s populist attacks on
migrants and refugees hit a peak in 2013. May dispatched a fleet
of ‘racist vans’ to the streets. The vans, pictured above,
told immigrants to ‘go home or face arrest’, and provided
numbers for suspicious citizens to dob in suspected
immigrants/refugees.

After
mass uproar at the Orwellian sight of vans trawling British
streets, May was forced to 
apologise.

But
she was undeterred. Later that same year, she 
sent officers
from the UK Border Agency to several transport hubs in the
South East, in an attempt to perform an anti-immigrant sweep.
Non-white commuters, mostly UK citizens, were seized by officials
demanding proof of citizenship.

Image
of UK Border Agency officers in Kensal Station, via 
Phil
O’Shea

The
following account was 
reported to The Kilburn
Times
:

according
to several witnesses the officers were aggressive, intimidating and
were specifically targeting non-white individuals.

Kensal
Rise resident Phil O’Shea told the Times he was threatened with
arrest when he asked what was going on.

He
said:

I
thought the behaviour of the immigration officers was heavy-handed
and frightening. They appeared to be stopping and questioning every
non-white person, many of whom were clearly ordinary Kensal Green
residents going to work.’

When
I queried what was going on I was threatened with arrest for
obstruction and was told to ‘crack on’.’

I
asked that officer for his name but he refused to give it and said I
could read his number on his shoulder but I couldn’t see a number
there.’

Donald
Trump and Theresa May are two peas in a pod

Anyone
hoping for May to provide pro-democratic counsel to Trump has missed
the rising authoritarianism on our own shores. May’s recent fawning
visit to the US was not solely about hopes of a post-Brexit
trade deal. The pair are also like two peas in a pod.

In
delivery and in matters of personal conduct, the two are juxtaposed.
But they share something far more important: a strong
authoritarian streak, an inability to compromise and work within a
team, and a hostility to progressive values.

If
you want to know what Donald Trump is going to do next, just look at
Britain. Because Theresa May already did it. And without a fraction
of the opposition Trump is facing.

That
should be a matter of concern for us all.

Get
Involved!

Keep
yourself informed by supporting and reading new media. Here are some
outlets we trust. Please add any you would like to in the comments:

The
Canary
Media
Diversified
Novara
Media
Corporate
Watch
Common
Space
Media
Lens
Bella
Caledonia
Vox
Political
Evolve
Politics
Real
Media
Reel
News
STRIKE!
magazine
The
Bristol Cable
Manchester
Mule
Salford
Star
The
Ferret

Read
more in our recommended book:

Afbeeldingsresultaat

Austerity:
The Demolition of the Welfare State and the Rise of the Zombie
Economy by Kerry-Anne Mendoza

* Vreemd genoeg leidde dit bespioneren van Merkel wel tot grote opschudding, maar dat was van korte duur, waar de uiteindelijke conclusie kan worden getrokken, dat men de VS haar gang laat gaan…….. Vergelijk dat eens met de totale ongefundeerde hysterie rond het zogenaamd manipuleren van de verkiezingen in de VS door Rusland en alle na aap hysterie in landen als Nederland, waar men e.e.a. beweert als was het een wet van Meden en Perzen, terwijl er niet één duizendste nanometer bewijs voor is………. Over nepnieuws brengen gesproken, waarbij dit ‘nieuws’ telkens weer als waarheid wordt gepropageerd door westerse politici en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media!!!

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Groot-Brittannië: de hongercijfers weggepoetst met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

Via Twitter ontving ik het volgende rapport van Trussel Trust (foodbanks) geplaatst op The Canary, het handelt over honger in één van de rijkste landen ter wereld: Groot-Brittannië. Al in 2012 was bekend, dat in GB meer dan anderhalf miljoen kinderen dagelijks met honger naar school gaan…….. In plaats van iets aan deze schandelijke zaak te doen, hebben het beleid van Cameron en zijn opvolger, hare kwaadaardigheid May de zaak verergerd, de hongercijfers zijn sinds 2012 dan ook nog verder gestegen….

Kwam dat even mooi uit, de publicatie van deze cijfers ten tijde van de presidentsverkiezingen in de VS. Totaal geen aandacht voor dit nieuwe armoede rapport. BBC World Service radio berichtte vanmorgen alleen over de presidentsverkiezingen in de VS…… Ook gisteren sprak dit radiostation niet over de cijfers van Trussel Trust.

Overigens zijn de cijfers van Trussel Trust discutabel en is de armoede (ook onder een groot aantal werkenden) veel groter dan in dit rapport wordt aangegeven. Wat betreft de honger onder kinderen, heeft Trussel Trust niet de kinderen meegerekend, die aangekomen op school alsnog een ontbijt krijgen aangeboden, dit vaak via andere goede doelen organisaties………

Hier het artikel van The Canary:

While
all are fixated on the US election, an appalling truth about the UK
has quietly been revealed

NOVEMBER
8TH, 2016  
CARLYN
HARVEY
 UK

While all are fixated on the US election, an appalling truth about the UK has quietly been revealed

It’s
election day in the US, and it’s captured most of the headlines.
But the furore over who may end up in the White House has distracted
us from some shocking figures released about the UK.

The
figures reveal the true cost of austerity, and how deprived the
nation is as a result.

Do
the math

The
Trussell Trust 
published its
latest foodbank figures on 8 November. It 
revealed that
it is on course to break its 12-year record for the delivery of food
parcels this year. The foodbank network 
gave
out
 519,342
emergency food supplies between April and September 2016. That’s
12,973 more than it supplied in the same period last year.

But
the real devil is in the detail. The trust records the numbers of the
“three day emergency food supplies” it hands out. These three-day
supplies contain enough food for 
10
meals
.
So the trust provided 5,193,420 meals to the UK public in those six
months. And 1,885,840 of those meals went to children.

Cause
and effect

The
Trussell Trust also recorded the causes for people’s referrals to
its foodbanks.

As
the chart shows, the majority of referrals were due to either benefit
delays, low incomes or benefit changes. Chief Executive of The
Trussell Trust David McAuley 
said:

“To
stop UK hunger we must make sure the welfare system works fairly and
compassionately, stopping people getting to a point where they have
no money to eat.”


The
trust has called on the government to set up a direct telephone
‘hotline’ between foodbanks and job centres. It 
claims that
line would give “timely and invaluable trouble-shooting support”
to people attending foodbanks due to issues with their welfare claim.

A
similar ‘direct line’ has been 
set
up
 between
the trust’s Coventry foodbank and Citizens Advice. This scheme has
seen 79% of users not returning to the foodbank following assistance.
Largely because that advice led to 
£700,000
being recouped
 for
those people through overturning sanctions, restructuring debt, and
accessing benefits they were entitled to.

The
UK’s national shame

The
sheer scale of foodbank dependency in Britain is a national shame.
And it’s a terrible indictment of the government’s welfare
reforms and ideology. These latest statistics should compel the
government to act. But our Prime Minister apparently doesn’t see
things that way. At Prime Minister’s Questions (PMQs) on 2
November, Theresa May 
said:

“It
is absolutely right that, in our welfare system, we have a system
that makes sure that those people who receive benefits are those who
it is right to receive benefits.”

The
UK is one of the wealthiest countries on Earth. So poverty on this
scale is a choice, not a necessity. The Conservative government needs
to step in and resolve the crisis. And if it doesn’t, the public
needs to take action against it at the next general election.

The
US is deciding the direction of its country right now. But the UK
will be presented with the same opportunity a few years down the
line. The Conservative Party would do well to remember that when
responding to this calamity.

Hier de link naar het volledige rapport

Ook in Nederland gaan meer en meer kinderen met honger, kapotte schoenen en gescheurde kleding naar school, een ‘geweldig resultaat’ van het ijskoude, inhumane neoliberale beleid van Rutte 1 en 2……..

Wat een wereld mensen, we moeten ons gaan organiseren, de ijskoude, neoliberale politiek neemt neemt wereldwijd hand over hand de macht over. Als we ons niet organiseren en in verzet komen, zijn we straks de gevangenen, van een volledig digitaal gecontroleerde politiestaat (tot achter de voordeur), één politiestaat die nog verder gaat, dan de in het boek 1984 van George Orwell beschreven dictatuur……..

Zie ook: ‘Carola Schouten (CU) met zwaar hypocriet commentaar, op het armoede beleid van Klijnsma……..

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘The Canary‘.