Groot-Brittannië stopt steun aan ‘gematigde rebellen’ en zelfs media spreken van terroristen i.p.v. ‘rebellen’

Het
reguliere Syrische leger en Russische troepen zouden optrekken richting het
laatste gebied dat wordt beheerst door terreurgroepen, groepen die media en
politici in het westen eufemistisch ‘gematigde rebellen’ noemen…..
Althans tot voor kort, in het hieronder opgenomen artikel, 
eerder gepubliceerd op Zero Hedgebericht
Tyler Durden over GB dat haar steun aan deze ‘gematigde rebellen’, alweer een onderafdeling van Al Qaida, heeft opgezegd.

Zoals
gezegd ook de reguliere media beginnen langzaam maar zeker met andere
woorden over deze terreurgroepen te schrijven, al zal het nog heel
wat tijd kosten voordat de massamedia hun toon zullen aanpassen….
Niet zo vreemd, immers daarmee geven die media organen aan dat ze in
feite vanaf het begin fout bezig zijn geweest en ‘fake news’ hebben gebracht.

Durden heeft het in het hieronder opgenomen artikel, volgens mij bij het verkeerde eind als hij stelt dat de Syrische provincie Idlib het laatste door terreurgroepen beheerst gebied is, immers in door de VS gecontroleerd gebied in het oosten van Syrië, worden terroristen van IS gedoogd en zelfs verdedigd door de VS*, mocht het Syrische leger een aanval inzetten (al is dit wel een andere situatie dan die in Idlib). 

UK
Finally Ditches ‘Moderate’ Syrian Rebels Ahead of Idlib Battle

August
20, 2018 at 11:46 pm

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE Op-ed) — CNN
warns that Syrian and Russian forces 
are
closing in on the
 “last
rebel stronghold” in Syria while 
characteristically
failing to inform its readers that the “rebel” coalition in
control of the northwest pocket of Idlib is but the latest
incarnation of al-Qaeda, calling itself 
Hay’at
Tahrir al-Sham
.

With
the final major battle looming which could mark the ultimate end and
final chapter to the war, 
the
Western public is about to be subjected to a final end-all media
onslaught of “the last hospital” and “the last school” and
“the last humanitarian rescuers”
 type
stories similar to 
how
the media presented the battle for Aleppo in 2016
.

Starting
this past weekend, the refrain started: 
Humanitarian
groups fear a ‘bloodbath’
 as
Assad looks to press the advantage and wipe out the last pockets
of resistance,”
 as NBC reported,
which was echoed across a dozen other outlets.

There’s
now even an Idlib version of 
“Bana” that
popped up on twitter only a month ago. Six-year old 
“Hala”
supposedly set up an account
 to
publish awareness videos telling the world to keep their “eyes on
Idlib” ahead of Assad’s impending military campaign.

However,
there are some few outlets out there that recently decided to
finally drop the worn out transparent charade of “moderate rebels”
and simply call Hay’at Tahrir al-Sham for what it is. 
Business
Insider
,
for example, 
accurately
labels
 Hay’at
Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) 
terrorist
group
 in
some of their recent headlines, and 
has
called
 the
al-Qaeda affiliate, “
the
next ISIS”
.

But
it appears that HTS is set to be wiped about before fully
establishing control as 
the
next ISIS
 as
Syrian government ground forces and the Russian Air Force have
already begun eroding their perimeters, which had been established
when al-Qaeda first took Idlib city and much of the surrounding
province in 2015, with US and UK coalition help.

Over
the past days and weeks,
 massive
Syrian troop and heavy armor deployments have been seen amassing
outside the al-Qaeda held province
,
poised for a final offensive. This after Syria’s southern
Daraa and Quneitra provinces were liberated in a mere matter of
weeks.

But
perhaps the greatest sign that the writing is on the wall for
Syria’s “the last rebel stronghold” (to repeat 
CNN’s
words
),
there are 
new
reports that Britain has cut off its longtime support to the
“moderate rebels”
 it
has for years throughout the war funded and armed.

According
to 
The
Guardian
:

The
UK government is to end funding to a scheme to support the Syrian
opposition
,
deeming the programmes now too risky to operate as the final
rebel-held areas face imminent attack from Bashar al-Assad’s
forces….

While
humanitarian support will continue, the ending of this governance
programme is highly symbolic, 
suggesting
Britain has accepted that the Syrian opposition, which it has backed
since the early days of the civil war in 2012 to 2013, is facing
imminent defeat from a combination of Syrian regime forces and
Russian airstrikes
.

On
Monday a UK government spokesperson confirmed the following: “As
the situation on the ground in some regions has become increasingly
difficult 
we
have reduced support for some of our non-humanitarian programming
,
but continue to deliver vital support to help those most in need and
to improve security and stability in the country,” according
to 
Reuters.

This
is in essence 
the
UK finally admitting its side has lost
 — though
we should note its “humanitarian funding” will continue to flow
to controversial groups like the ‘White Helmets’, who have long
been proven 
to
work in tandem with al-Qaeda
.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

====================================

* Zie: ‘VN rapport: de VS geeft ISIS de ruimte in door VS illegaal bezet gebied in Syrië…..

EU wil alleen geld voor wederopbouw Syrië geven na toezegging ‘vrije verkiezingen’, waarvan Assad moet zijn uitgesloten……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Er is momenteel een EU conferentie gaande over de wederopbouw van Syrië. WDR 5 meldde in het nieuws van 13.30 u. dat Duitsland een miljard wil geven voor de wederopbouw van Syrië (waarvan een deel voor de vluchtelingen in omliggende landen), waar de EU dit laat afhangen van ‘een paar voorwaarden’.

Zo stelt de EU o.a. dat er eerst vrije verkiezingen moeten worden gehouden in Syrië, verkiezingen waarvan Assad en zijn Ba’ath partij moeten worden uitgesloten…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! De oplichters in Brussel hebben wel een heel vreemde opvatting van ‘vrije verkiezingen……’ Trouwens hoe kunnen verkiezingen vrij zijn als men in het buitenland eisen stelt aan deze verkiezingen……

Daarmee is ook nog eens sprake van een illegale inmenging in binnenlandse aangelegenheden van een soevereine staat, een staat waarvan de regering in 2014 ook nog eens democratisch werd gekozen door een grote meerderheid van de kiezers, in door internationale waarnemers goedgekeurde verkiezingen >> iets dat onder meer door The Guardian middels ‘false news’, of zoals je wilt ‘nepnieuws’ werd en wordt ontkend…….)

Moet je nagaan: een aantal EU landen, waaronder Nederland, hebben ook nog eens meegedaan (of doen dit nog) aan de illegale oorlog tegen het democratisch gekozen Syrische bewind…….. Want daar komt het op neer: onder het mom van het bestrijden van IS, was en is men uit op de val van Assad……

Vrije verkiezingen……..

Zie ook: ‘The Guardian met propaganda over Syrië, die zo uit Orwells 1984 zou kunnen komen……

        en: ‘The Guardian bracht anti-Russische propaganda i.v.m. ‘gifgasaanval’ Douma en weigert dit te rectificeren, of te verwijderen…….

The Guardian bracht anti-Russische propaganda i.v.m. ‘gifgasaanval’ Douma en weigert dit te rectificeren, of te verwijderen…….

The
Guardian bracht afgelopen donderdag het bericht dat 2 Twitteraccounts
niet tot echte mensen behoorden, maar door Russische bot’s werden aangestuurd (of zoals
je wilt: door geautomatiseerde software) werden bediend.

In
die Twitterberichten werd de ‘gifgasaanval’ in Douma neergezet als
een vals bericht (niet een ‘false flag’, dat zou een wel gepleegde
gifgasaanval zijn, die in de schoenen van bijvoorbeeld Assads bewind
werd geschoven, iets dat overigens meermaals wel is gebeurd in Syrië, zoals bij de grote gifgasaanval van 2013…)…..

De
eigenaren van de accounts, wel degelijk bestaande personen, hebben zich kenbaar gemaakt en 
nee, het gaat niet om de gebruikelijke en spreekwoordelijke zwart gemaakte Russische schapen…..

Ondanks
dat The Guardian op de hoogte is van het gelogen bericht, weigert dit
dagblad te rectificeren en het bewuste artikel te verwijderen van het
internet…….

Lees
het volgende artikel van Caitlin Johnstone over een dagblad dat de mond vol
heeft met de woorden ‘fake news’, waar het zelf fake news (of: nepnieuws) brengt, fake news dat
de bevolking op moet zetten tegen Syrië en Rusland……. Waar de waarheid over de
‘gifgasaanval’, namelijk dat deze niet bestaand was en is, wordt geweigerd door The Guardian en de redactie deze zelfs weigert ook maar als mogelijkheid te zien……. ‘Niet vreemd dus’ dat The Guardian de leugen over Russische bots niet wenst te rectificeren, een herhaling van de enorme berg leugens over de Russische bemoeienis met de presidentsverkiezingen in de VS……

Johnstone stelt terecht dat het niet toegeven van fouten (fouten die de politieke situatie verdedigen, dus het illegaal oorlogvoeren in gebieden waar in dit geval GB niets te zoeken heeft) geen probleem is, sterker nog: met het toegeven van dit soort fouten zou men niet alleen de politiek tegen de haren instrijken, maar ook de eigenaar (of eigenaren) van The Guardian, een dagblad dat zich de laatste paar jaar heeft ontpopt als oorlogshitser…….. Dezelfde Guardian die na Douma stelde: “After Douma, the west’s response to Syria’s regime must be military….” En dat voor een mediaorgaan dat zegt onafhankelijk te zijn…….

The
Guardian Is Committing Journalistic Malpractice By Not Retracting
This Claim

caitlin
johnstone

On
the 19th of April, 
The
Guardian
 published
an article making the positive assertion that two Twitter accounts
were run not by real people, but by 
automated
bot software
 based
in Russia. Since the article was published, the owners of both
accounts have stepped forward, on video, demonstrating in no
uncertain terms that they are in fact real human beings and not
software programs.

As
of this writing, days later, there has been neither retraction nor
correction of the false claims made by 
The
Guardian
,
and 
the
article
remains as
published
.

The
article’s author, Heather Stewart, makes the following claim:

“One
bot, 
@Ian56789,
was sending 100 posts a day during a 12-day period from 7 April, and
reached 23 million users, before the account was suspended. It
focused on claims that the chemical weapons attack on Douma had been
falsified, using the hashtag 
#falseflag.
Another, 
@Partisangirl,
reached 61 million users with 2,300 posts over the same 12-day
period.”

Stewart
explicitly asserts that the Twitter account 
@Ian56789 is
a bot. That account’s owner 
appeared
for an interview
 on Sky
News
,
completely disproving this assertion. Stewart also names the Twitter
account 
@Partisangirl as
a bot account. The account’s owner, Maram Susli, is a well-known
Syrian-Australian activist with 
many
publicly available videos
 and
Wikipedia
page
.

This
is an extremely egregious case of journalistic malpractice. A
demonstrable falsehood has been published about two individuals, the
information has been publicly available for days, and there has been
no correction or retraction from a trusted mainstream news source.
When confronted with the obvious and undeniable falsehoods in her
story, Heather Stewart 
tweeted,
“It’s not my analysis – as the piece makes quite clear – it’s
the government’s.”

Wow.
There’s a lot going on in those thirteen words. First of all, a
journalist’s most important job is to question government power and
hold it to account. The fact that mainstream British journos are now
defending the unquestioning advancement of demonstrably false smears
by saying that’s what the government told them to say should disturb
everyone, and the fact that they’re not even correcting it at all is
positively bone-chilling. Even after admitting to being a government
stenographer, there should still be a correction after a claim’s
demonstrably false nature comes to light.

Secondly,
Stewart’s wording explicitly asserts that those accounts are bots as
an absolute fact. It doesn’t say “One alleged bot, 
@Ian56789,”
it says “One bot”. It doesn’t say “Another account the
British government has labeled a bot, 
@Partisangirl,”
it asserts that the account 
is a
bot. Stewart took the British government at its word, repeated what
she was told as absolute fact, and published it in a very widely read
and trusted news outlet, which has refused to retract or correct the
claim.

This
is because both 
The
Guardian
 and
and Stewart know that in today’s political environment there are
never any consequences for these McCarthyite hatchet jobs. It is much
better for them to ignore those speaking dissenting perspectives than
to publicly admit error, because those who question the narratives
which benefit longstanding imperialist agendas do not have power on
their side. 
The
Guardian
 has
arguably become in recent years the single most virulent promulgator
of war propaganda on the planet, and it is protected by the might of
the western empire. Those who get crushed into the dirt by its tank
treads, not so much.

The
legendary Australian journalist John Pilger, whose work on the evils
of war and imperialism has been an inspiration for generations of
journalists like myself, stated in an interview earlier this year
that there was a “purge” of antiwar writers from 
The
Guardian
 some
three years ago.

But
my written journalism is no longer welcome – probably its last home
was 
The
Guardian
,
which three years ago got rid of people like me and others in pretty
much a purge of those who were saying what 
The
Guardian
 no
longer says anymore,” Pilger 
said on
the 
Flashpoint radio
show
.

                  

Since
that time we’ve seen a relentless outpouring of pro-interventionist
propaganda from 
The
Guardian
 with
headlines like “
After
Douma, the west’s response to Syria’s regime must be military
“,
conducting 
fact-free
smear jobs
 on
opponents of Syrian interventionism, and 
deliberately
hiding all evidence
 which
contradicts the pro-interventionist narrative. Day after day after
day this toxic outlet advocates death, destruction and mass murder
over peace and common sense, and 
those
who have been permitted to rise within its ranks
 are
the ones who understand that it is in the interests of their career
advancement to march to the beat of the war drum.

This
is not healthy, and this is not acceptable. But in a way it’s good
that these brazen war propagandists are exposing themselves so
completely, because we can point at what they are doing and present
clear evidence of a mass media campaign to manufacture support for
longstanding
regime change agenda
,
thereby shattering the faith that people have placed in these
deceitful institutions. Hopefully we can do it before they do much
more harm.

Internet
censorship is getting pretty bad, so best way to keep seeing my daily
articles is to get on the mailing list for my 
website,
so you’ll get an email notification for everything I publish. My
articles and podcasts are entirely reader and listener-funded, so if
you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me
on 
Facebook,
following my antics on 
Twitter, checking
out my
 podcast,
throwing some money into my hat on
 Patreon or Paypalor
buying my new book
 Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Journalism
guardian
msm propaganda
caitlinjohnstone

Zie ook: ‘The Guardian met propaganda over Syrië, die zo uit Orwells 1984 zou kunnen komen……

        en: ‘EU wil alleen geld voor wederopbouw Syrië geven na toezegging ‘vrije verkiezingen’, waarvan Assad moet zijn uitgesloten……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en:  ‘BBC verklaart oorlogscorrespondent Vanessa Beeley met haar berichtgeving over Syrië en de gifgasaanval op Douma als staatsgevaarlijk…………

        en: ‘VS en GB brengen propaganda die moet verdoezelen wat er echt gebeurt in Syrië…….. Door VS gebombardeerde ‘gifgasfabriek’ niet bestaand….

The Guardian met propaganda over Syrië, die zo uit Orwells 1984 zou kunnen komen……

Zero
Hedge bracht een artikel van Tyler Durden waarin deze de
berichtgeving rond de ‘gifgasaanval’ in het Syrische Douma door The
Guardian onder de spreekwoordelijke loep nam.

De
conclusie is niet misselijk: de berichtgeving in The Guardian zou zo
weggelopen kunnen zijn uit het boek 1984 van George Orwell.

Zaken
worden op zo’n manier gebracht dat de argeloze lezer maar één
conclusie kan trekken: Assad heeft een massamoord begaan, niet alleen
in Douma maar in heel Oost-Ghouta…. Voorts zou Rusland dat hebben gesteund en hebben meegeholpen…… Waar Syrië al sinds de oorlog daar begon werd en wordt gedemoniseerd, dit door een door de VS en een aantal partners georganiseerde opstand, waar de eerste onderhandelingen tot het omverwerpen van het Assad regime al van 2006 dateren (daar zijn bewijzen voor, o.a. te vinden in Wikileaks!)

Ook
het woordgebruik interesseert Durden, jammer genoeg zijn deze
moeilijk te vertalen, zoals het verschil tussen de Engelse werkwoorden
‘purifying’ en ‘clearing’, waar de eerste makkelijk kan aangeven dat
men een plek heeft gezuiverd van plaagdieren en de tweede aan kan
geven dat een plek is vrijgemaakt van terroristen. Ja, ik weet ‘t,
dit laat zich niet zo makkelijk vertalen, echter daar komt het wel op
neer, zo wordt de eerste, dus ‘purifying’ gebruikt voor de
handelswijze van het legitieme, democratisch gekozen regime in Syrië,
ofwel Syrië heeft Oost-Ghouta gezuiverd van ongedierte en dat doet
men veelal middels vergassing……. (overigens legt Durden een enigszins ander verband)

Nogmaals
wijst Durden op de weigering van de VS en haar westerse hielenlikkers
om de OPCW in te schakelen voor een onafhankelijk onderzoek naar de gifgasaanval in Douma, iets waar Syrië
en Rusland op aandrongen. Gelukkig besloot de OPCW zelfstandig een
onderzoek in te stellen……. Kijk dat is toch een heel ander
verhaal dan ons door de reguliere media en het grootste deel van de politiek door de strot werd geduwd:
Syrië en Rusland weigeren een onderzoek naar de ‘gifgasaanval’ in
Douma! (en dat op een manier en frequentie die zich het best laat vergelijken met hersenspoelen….)

How
The Guardian Fulfills George Orwell’s Prediction Of ‘Newspeak’

by Tyler
Durden

Fri,
04/20/2018 – 02:00

Authored
by Eric Zuesse via The Strategic Culture Foundation,

On
Sunday April 15th, Britain’s 
Guardian bannered “OPCW
inspectors set to investigate site of Douma chemical attack”
 and
pretended that there was no question that a chemical attack in Douma
Syria on April 7th had actually occurred, 
and
the article then went further along that same propaganda-line, to
accuse Syria’s Government of having perpetrated it. This ‘news’
story opened [and clarificatory comments from me will added in
brackets]:

UN
chemical weapons investigators were set on Sunday to begin examining
the scene of a chemical attack in the Syrian city of Douma, which had
prompted the joint US, French and British strikes against military
installations and chemical weapons facilities near the capital,
Damascus.

The
arrival of the delegation from the Organisation for the Prohibition
of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) came as the Syrian military announced that
it had “purified” [no source provided, but 
this — from
7 March 2018
  is
the only source that existed prior to the April 14th
missiles-invasion of Syria, and its meaning is 
very
different
: the
region of eastern Ghouta, of which Douma is a part, after a two-month
campaign that killed nearly 2,000 civilians [no source provided as
regards either the number, or that all of them were ‘civilians’
and that none of them were jihadists or “terrorists”],
following years of siege.

The
propaganda-article continued directly: 

Units
of our brave armed forces, and auxiliary and allied forces, completed
the purification of eastern Ghouta, including all its towns and
villages, of armed terrorist organisations,” the general command
statement said.

No
source was provided for that, but this sentence is a sly
mind-manipulation, because here is what the Syrian Government’s
General Command had actually said
“Statement
of the Army General Command declaring Eastern Ghouta clear of
terrorism”
 as
headlined by the Syrian Government itself.

In
other words: the Guardian’s ‘journalist’ had substituted the
word “clear” by the word “purify” and did this after having
already asserted but not documented, that the Government had just
completed “a two-month campaign that killed nearly 2,000
civilians.”

When
the Syrian Government announces that an area has been “cleared of
terrorists (or of terrorism),” the US-allied propagandist uses the
word “purify,” such as “purified the region of eastern Ghouta”
or “the purification of eastern Ghouta, including all its towns
and villages, of armed terrorist organisations.”

But
by the time that the reader gets there to “purification … of
armed terrorist organisations,” 
the
reader has already been indoctrinated to believe that Syria’s
Government is trying to “purify” 
land,
or perpetrate some type of 
ethnic-cleansing

Later,
the article asserts that,

“The OPCW mission
will arrive in Douma eight days after the chemical attack, and days
after the area fell to the control of Russian military and Syrian
government forces. That delay, along with the possibility of the
tampering of evidence by the forces accused of perpetrating the
attack, raises doubts about what the OPCW’s inspectors might be
able to discover.”

However,
a fierce debate is being waged over whether this was not any real
“chemical attack” but instead a staged event by the jihadists in
order to draw Trump back into invading Syria.
 In
other words: any journalistic reference yet, at this time, to the
event as “the chemical attack” instead of as “the alleged
chemical attack” is garbage, just as, prior to the
guilty-verdict in a murder trial, no journalistic reference may
legitimately be made to the defendant as “the murderer,” instead
of as “the defendant.” That is lynch-mob ‘journalism’,
which Joseph Goebbels championed.

The
Joseph-Goebbels-following ‘journalist’ has thus opened by
implying that the Russia-allied Syrian Government is trying to crush
a democratic revolution, instead of the truth, that the US-allied
Governments are trying to overthrow and replace the Russia-allied
Syrian Government.

It’s
a big difference, between the lie, and the truth.

Another
story in the April 15th Guardian was 
“Pressure
grows on Russia to stop protecting Assad as US, UK and France press
for inquiry into chemical weapons stockpiles”
 and this
one pretended that the issue is for “Russia to stop protecting
Assad,”
 who
is the 
democratically
elected
 and popular President
of Syria, and not to stop 
the
invasion of Syria since 2011 by US and Saudi backed foreign jihadists
to overthrow him
.

Furthermore,
as regards “press for inquiry into chemical weapons
stockpiles,” 
the
real and urgent issue right now is to allow the Organization for the
Prevention of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) into Douma to hold an
independent and authoritative investigation into the evidence
there.
 Russia
pressed for it at the U.N. Security Council and the US and its allies
blocked it there.
 But
the OPCW went anyway — even after the US-allied invasion on April
14th — and this courageous resistance by them against 
the
US dictatorship
 can
only be considered heroic.

That
type of ‘news’-reporting is virtually universal in The West,
among the US and its allied governments,
 which
refer to themselves as ‘democracies’ and refer to any Government
that they wish to overthrow and replace by their own selected
dictator, as ‘dictatorships’, such as these regimes had referred
to Iraq in 2003, Libya in 2011, Syria forever, and Ukraine in 2014.

Politics   War Conflict

==============================

PS:
gezien het voorgaande is het niet vreemd dat de VS toenadering heeft
gezocht tot Rusland, zoals vannacht bekend werd gemaakt, immers snel
zal blijken dat er geen gifgasaanval heeft plaatsgevonden in
Douma….. Reken maar dat wanneer de VS nog steeds van het
tegenovergestelde overtuigd was, de Trump administratie een toenadering tussen Rusland en de VS had afgewezen……. Trouwens ook hierover wordt weer volop gelogen in de media, als zou Putin eindelijk de redelijkheid van het westen in deze inzien…….. Alsof Rusland tot nu toe elk overleg heeft afgewezen, een smerige leugen…. Sterker nog: zoals eerder op deze plek betoogd: met de VS in de omgekeerde rol, waren we waarschijnlijk al in een enorme oorlog verwikkeld geweest, neem het neerschieten van een Russische jager, of de massamoord op 100 Russische vrijwilligers, die aan de kant van het Syrisch leger meevochten, dan wel de aanval op een Russische tank…….. Het is aan Putin te danken dat deze en andere zaken niet tot een oorlog (WOIII) hebben geleid!

Zie ook: ‘The Guardian bracht anti-Russische propaganda i.v.m. ‘gifgasaanval’ Douma en weigert dit te rectificeren, of te verwijderen…….

        en: ‘EU wil alleen geld voor wederopbouw Syrië geven na toezegging ‘vrije verkiezingen’, waarvan Assad moet zijn uitgesloten……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Syrian ‘Rebels’ Used Sarin Nerve Gas Sold By Britain

        en: Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘VS bezig met voorbereiding van een ‘door Syrië’ gepleegde gifgasaanval, ofwel de volgende VS false flag operatie
        en: VS, GB en Frankrijk begaan enorme oorlogsmisdaad met aanval op Syrische doelen……

        en: ‘Aanval op Syrische doelen door VS, GB en Frankrijk op moment dat de beurs 2 dagen is gesloten….

        en: ‘In Douma vond geen gifgasaanval plaats aldus gelauwerd journalist Robert Fisk…..

        en: ‘De Hoop Scheffer (CDA en ex-NAVO) heeft geen spijt voor de steun aan de illegale Irakoorlog >> 1,5 miljoen vermoorde Irakezen verder……

        en: ‘Russische volk wordt geadviseerd zich voor te bereiden op een nucleaire oorlog……



        en: ‘Rusland voorspelde ‘de gifgasaanval’ in Oost-Ghouta en de reactie daarop van de VS…..

        en: ‘Rusland beschuldigd GB van het regisseren gifgasaanval Douma en zegt daar bewijzen voor te hebben


        en: ‘Gifgasaanval vooropgezet spel om VS actie te rechtvaardigen, waarbij GB de spelers opdracht gaf dit toneelspel snel uit te voeren…….. ‘False flag gelukt’: Syrië gebombardeerd zonder enig bewijs voor schuld…..

        en: ‘De OPCW inspecteurs en hun werk in Douma n.a.v. ‘gifgasaanval…’

        en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint

        en: ‘Hondsdolle VS valt Russische tank aan in poging de Russen te provoceren……

        en: ‘Syrian ‘Rebels’ Used Sarin Nerve Gas Sold By Britain

        en:  ‘BBC verklaart oorlogscorrespondent Vanessa Beeley met haar berichtgeving over Syrië en de gifgasaanval op Douma als staatsgevaarlijk…………

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!‘ (over eerdere gifgasaanvallen)

Noord-Korea een agressor? Hier de feiten!

Noord-Korea wordt door de regering van Trump en daarmee door de rest van de westerse landen gezien als een bedreiging…… Niet dat Noord-Korea, zoals de VS, de ene na de andere illegale oorlog begint, of illegale geheime militaire missies uitvoert in landen waar het haar maar uitkomt, zoals de VS al meer dan 100 jaar doet en nee N-K organiseert geen staatsgrepen, of opstanden die tot staatsgrepen moeten leiden, zoals de VS keer op keer doet…… Ondanks dat wordt Noord-Korea niet alleen gezien als een bedreiging voor de VS en andere landen, maar wordt het land zelfs gezien als een bedreiging voor de wereldvrede………

Ondanks alle ‘mooie praatjes’ van het beest Trump, de huidige president van de VS, ten spijt, wenst dit ‘land’ niet in gesprek te gaan met Noord-Korea, zoals een woordvoerder van Tillerson, de VS minister van Buitenlandse Zaken, op 5 augustus jl. in Manilla liet weten……..

Het is niet vreemd dat Noord-Korea een eigen atoomwapen wil hebben, immers de VS heeft zoals gezegd al zoveel landen aangevallen, dat het bewind serieus moet vrezen voor een VS aanval op haar grondgebied……. Vergeet daarnaast niet dat de VS maar liefst 15 militaire bases in Zuid-Korea heeft, waarvan er 1 direct aan de grens (gedemilitariseerde zone) van N-K staat en een andere dichtbij die grens. Deze bases zijn voorzien van het modernste militaire moordwapentuig en meerdere massavernietigingswapens…….

Beste bezoeker, lees het volgende artikel waarin nog veel meer feiten op een rij worden gezet, dit artikel werd vorige week donderdag op Information Clearing House gepubliceerd en werd overgenomen van Global Research. Onder het artikel kan u klikken voor een vertaling (neemt wel enige tijd in beslag):

North
Korea, An Aggressor? A Reality Check

By
Felicity Arbuthnot

“ … war
in our time is always indiscriminate, a war against innocents, a war
against children.”(
Howard
Zinn
,
1922-2010.)



All
war represents a failure of diplomacy.” (
Tony
Benn
,
MP. 1925-2014.)

No
country too poor, too small, too far away, not to be threat, a threat
to the American way of life.” (
William
Blum
,
“Rogue State.”)   

August
24, 2017 “Information
Clearing House
” – 
The
mention of one tiny country appears to strike at the rationality and
sanity of those who should know far better. On Sunday, 6
th August,
for example, The Guardian headed an editorial: “The Guardian view
on sanctions: an essential tool.” Clearly the average of five
thousands souls a month, the majority children, dying of “embargo
related causes” in Iraq, year after grinding year – genocide in
the name of the UN – for over a decade has long been forgotten by
the broadsheet of the left.

This
time of course, the target is North Korea upon whom the United
Nations Security Council has voted unanimously to freeze, strangulate
and deny essentials, normality, humanity. Diplomacy as ever, not even
a consideration. The Guardian, however, incredibly, declared the
decimating sanctions: “A rare triumph of diplomacy …” (Guardian
6th August 2017.)

As
US Secretary of State, 
Rex
Tillerson
,
the US’ top “diplomat” and his North Korean counterpart 
Ri
Yong-ho
 headed
for the annual Ministerial meeting of the Association of Southeast
Asian Nations (ASEAN) in Manila on 5
th August,
a State Department spokesperson said of Tillerson:

The
Secretary has no plans to meet the North Korean Foreign Minister in
Manila, and I don’t expect to see that happen”

Pathetic.
In April, approaching his hundredth day in office, Trump said of
North Korea:

We’d
love to solve things diplomatically but it’s very difficult.”

No
it is not. Talk, walk in the other’s psychological shoes. Then,
there they were at the same venue but the Trump Administration
clearly does not alone live in a land of missed opportunities, but of
opportunities deliberately buried in landfill miles deep. This in
spite of his having said in the same statement:

There
is a chance that we could end up having a major, major conflict with
North Korea. Absolutely.”

A
bit of perspective: 27th July 2017 marked sixty four
years since the armistice agreement that ended the devastating three
year Korean war, however there has never been a peace treaty, thus
technically the Korean war has never ended. Given that and American’s
penchant for wiping out countries with small populations which pose
them no threat (think most recently, Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya) no
wonder North Korea wishes to look as if it has some heavy protective
gear behind the front door, so to speak.

Tiny
North Korea has a population of just 25.37 million and landmass of
120,540 km² (square kilometres.) The US has a population of 323.1
million and a landmass of 9.834 MILLION km² (square kilometres.)
Further, since 1945, the US is believed to have produced some 70,000
nuclear weapons – though now down to a “mere” near 7,000 –
but North Korea is a threat?  

America
has fifteen military bases in South Korea – down from a staggering
fifty four – bristling with every kind of weapons of mass
destruction. Two bases are right on the North Korean border and
another nearly as close
.
See full details of each, with map at (1.)

North
Korea also has the collective memory of the horror wrought by the US
in the three year conflict on a country then with a population of
just 9.6 million souls. US General Curtis Lemay in the aftermath
stated: “After destroying North Korea’s seventy eight cities and
thousands of her villages, and killing countless numbers of her
civilians … Over a period of three years or so we killed off –
what – twenty percent of the population.”

It
is now believed that the population north of the imposed 38th
Parallel lost nearly a third its population of 8 – 9 million people
during the 37-month long ‘hot’ war, 1950 – 1953, perhaps an
unprecedented percentage of mortality suffered by one nation due to
the belligerence of another.” (2)
 

In
context:

During
The Second World War the United Kingdom lost 0.94% of its population,
France lost 1.35%, China lost 1.89% and the US lost 0.32%. During the
Korean war, North Korea lost close to 30 % of its
population.” 
(Emphasis
added.)

We
went over there and fought the war and 
eventually
burned down every town in North Korea anyway, some way or another
 …”,
boasted Lemay.

Gen.
Douglas MacArthur
 said
during a Congressional hearing in 1951 that he had never seen such
devastation.

I
shrink with horror that I cannot express in words … at this
continuous slaughter of men in Korea,” MacArthur said. “I have
seen, I guess, as much blood and disaster as any living man, and it
just curdled my stomach, the last time I was there.” (CNN,
28
th July
2017.)

Horrified
as he was, he did not mention the incinerated women, children,
infants in the same breath.

Moreover,
as 
Robert
M. Neer
 wrote
in “Napalm, an American Biography”:

‘“Practically
every U.S. fighter plane that has flown into Korean air carried at
least two napalm bombs,” Chemical Officer Townsend wrote in January
1951. About 21,000 gallons of napalm hit Korea every day in 1950. As
combat intensified after China’s intervention, that number more
than tripled (…) a total of 32,357 tons of napalm fell on Korea,
about double that dropped on Japan in 1945. Not only did the allies
drop more bombs on Korea than in the Pacific theater during World War
II – 635,000 tons, versus 503,000 tons – more of what fell was
napalm …’

In
the North Korean capitol, Pyongyang, just two buildings were reported
as still standing.

In
the unending history of US warmongering, North Korea is surely the
smallest population they had ever attacked until their assault on
tiny Grenada in October 1983, population then just 91,000 (compulsory
silly name: “Operation Urgent Fury.)

North
Korea has been taunted by the US since it lay in ruins after the
armistice sixty five years ago, yet as ever, the US Administration
paints the vast, self appointed “leader of the free world” as the
victim.

As
Fort-Russ pointed out succinctly (7th August 2017):

The
Korean Peninsula is in a state of crisis not only due to constant US
threats towards North Korea, but also due to various provocative
actions, such as Washington conducting joint military exercises with
Seoul amid tensions, and which Pyongyang considered a threat to its
national security.”

This
month “massive land, sea and air exercises” involving “tens of
thousands of troops” from the US and South Korea began on 21st  of
August and continue until 31st.

In
the past, the practices are believed to have included “decapitation
strikes” – trial operations for an attempt to kill 
Kim
Jong-un
 and
his top Generals …’, according to the Guardian (11
th August
2017.)

The
obligatory stupid name chosen for this dangerous, belligerent, money
burning, sabre rattling nonsense is Ulchi-Freedom Guardian. It is an
annual occurrence since first initiated back in 1976.

US
B-1B bombers flying from Guam recently carried out exercises in South
Korea and “practiced attack capabilities by releasing inert weapons
at the Pilsung Range.” In a further provocative (and illegal) move,
US bombers were again reported to overfly North Korea, another of
many such bullying, threatening actions, reportedly eleven just since
May this year.

Yet
in spite of all, North Korea is the “aggressor.”

The
nuclear warheads of United States of America are stored in some
twenty one locations, which include thirteen U.S. states and five
European countries … some are on board U.S. submarines. There are
some “zombie” nuclear warheads as well, and they are kept in
reserve, and as many as 3,000 of these are still awaiting their
dismantlement. (The US) also extends its “nuclear umbrella” to
such other countries as South Korea, Japan, and Australia.”
(
worldatlas.com)

Russian Foreign
Minister Sergey Lavrov
 who
also attended the ASEAN meeting in Manila, did of course, do what
proper diplomats do and talked with his North Korean counterpart Ri
Yong-ho. Minister Lavrov’s opinion was summed up by a Fort Russ
News observer as:

The
Korean Peninsula is in a state of crisis not only due to constant US
threats towards North Korea, but also due to various provocative
actions, such as Washington conducting joint military exercises with
Seoul amid tensions, and which Pyongyang considered a threat to its
national security.”

The
“provocative actions” also include the threatening over-flights
by US ‘planes flying from Guam. However when North Korea said if
this continued they would consider firing missiles in to the ocean
near Guam – not as was reported by some hystericals as threatening
to bomb Guam – Agent Orange who occasionally pops in to the White
House between golf rounds and eating chocolate cake whilst muddling
up which country he has dropped fifty nine Tomahawk Cruise missiles
on, responded that tiny North Korea will again be: “… met with
fire and fury and frankly power, the likes of which the world has
never seen before.”

It
was barely noticed that North Korea qualified the threat of a shot
across the bows by stating pretty reasonably:

(The
US) “should immediately stop its reckless military provocation
against the State of the DPRK so that the latter would not be forced
to make an unavoidable military choice.” (3)

As Cheryl
Rofer
 (see
3) continued, instead of endless threats, US diplomacy could have
many routes:

We
could have sent a message to North Korea via the recent Canadian
visit to free one of their citizens. We could send a message through
the Swedish embassy to North Korea, which often represents US
interests. We could arrange some diplomatic action on which China
might take the lead. There are many possibilities, any of which might
show North Korea that we are willing to back off from practices that
scare them if they will consider backing off on some of their
actions. That would not include their nuclear program explicitly at
this time, but it would leave the way open for later.”

are
in fact, twenty four diplomatic missions in all, in North Korea
through which the US could request to communicate – or Trump could
even behave like a grown up and pick up the telephone.

Siegfried
Hecker
 is
the last known American official to inspect North Korea’s nuclear
facilities. He says that treating Kim Jong-un as though he is on the
verge of attacking the U.S. is both inaccurate and dangerous.

Some
like to depict Kim as being crazy – a madman – and that makes the
public believe that the guy is undeterrable. He’s not crazy and
he’s not suicidal. And he’s not even unpredictable. The real
threat is we’re going to stumble into a nuclear war on the Korean
Peninsula.” (5)

Trump
made his crass “fire and fury” threat on the eve of the sixty
second commemoration of the US nuclear attack on Nagasaki, the
nauseating irony seemingly un-noticed by him.

Will
some adults pitch up on Capitol Hill before it is too late?

Notes

1. https://militarybases.com/
south-korea/

2. http://www.globalresearch.ca/
know-the-facts-north-korea- lost-close-to-30-of-its-
population-as-a-result-of-us- bombings-in-the-1950s/22131

3. https://nucleardiner.
wordpress.com/2017/08/11/ north-korea-reaches-out/

4. https://www.commondreams.org/
news/2017/08/08/sane-voices- urge-diplomacy-after-lunatic-
trump-threatens-fire-and-fury

Featured
image is from Socialist Project.

This
article was first published by
 Global
Research
 –

Copyright
© 
Felicity
Arbuthnot

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

============================


Zie ook: ‘Noord-Korea heeft meermaals aangeboden haar kernwapenprogramma te stoppen, ofwel wat de media verzwijgen……

       en: ‘Putin waarschuwt voor een planetaire nucleaire catastrofe en roept om vreedzame diplomatie met Noord-Korea


       en: ‘Noord-Koreaanse raket zorgt voor belachelijke massahysterie…….

       en: ‘VS
buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en
oorlogen……….

       en: ‘Noord-Korea
verkeerd begrepen: het land wordt bedreigd door de VS, dat alleen
deze eeuw al minstens 4 illegale oorlogen begon……..

       en:
Raketwetenschappers
over Noord-Korea’s kernraketten bluf en angstzaaierij in de VS……

       en:
North
Korea: Killer Sanctions Imposed By The UN Security Council

       en: ‘North
Korea Does Not Trust America for a Pretty Good Reason

       en: ‘Only
Morons Believe What The US Government Says About North Korea

       en: ‘Noord-Korea
een gevaar voor de VS? Daar is N-K niet voor nodig: de VS besmet haar
eigen burgers met radioactieve straling!

       en: ‘VS
dreigt Noord-Korea met wat je niet anders dan een nucleaire aanval
kan noemen……..

       en: ‘Noord-Korea:
VS negeert de waarschuwing van China niet door te gaan, met
voorgenomen militaire oefening tegen N-K…….

 
     
en:
NBC
presentator geeft toe dat het de taak van NBC is de mensen doodsbang
te maken voor Noord-Korea……. Ofwel: ‘fake news’ op en top!!

 
     
en:
Noord-Koreaanse
raketten zijn waardeloos, aldus VS generaal Selva…….

 
     
en:
Noord-Korea
en de VS: de planning van de VS om Rusland en China aan te vallen met
kernraketten……..

      en:  ‘Korea, Afghanistan and the Never Ending War Trap‘ (met ook daaronder een mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

VS aanval op Syrische basis, zoals gewoonlijk uitermate voorbarig en bijzonder gevaarlijk!!

Van Anti-Media kreeg ik afgelopen woensdag een artikel over de ‘gifgasaanval van Syrië’, op de stad Kahn Sheikhoun in de provincie Idlib. In het artikel worden een aantal zaken opgenoemd, die op z’n zachtst gezegd grote vraagtekens zetten bij deze gifgasaanval en de reactie in het westen.

Als eerste noemt de schrijver Shahtahmasebi de eerdere vermeende grote gifgasaanval in Syrië uit 2013, waar men net als nu, onmiddellijk de schuld bij het Syrische bewind durfde te leggen…… Deze bewering wordt tot op de dag van vandaag volgehouden, terwijl de VN commissie van onderzoek, o.l.v. Carla Del Ponte na uitgebreid onderzoek, als schuldige de ‘gematigde rebellen’ aanwees…… Dit was de aanval waarbij Obama’s ‘rode streep’ zou zijn overschreden………

De totaal afhankelijke Radio1 presentator Kockelman stelde vanmorgen in de aankondiging van Standpunt NL, dat de gifgasaanval uit 2013 aan Assad wordt toegeschreven, ‘hoewel daar twijfels over zijn…..’ Geen moment om te lachen, maar gezien het voorgaande, is dit wel een uiterst belachelijke uitspraak en een eufemisme van reuzenformaat…… Het komt er zoals gewoonlijk op neer, dat de VS tegen vastgelegd bewijs in, zaken vol blijft houden en deze achterlijke houding wordt door de reguliere westerse (massa-) media en het overgrote deel van de westerse politici, als de waarheid omarmt……. Ach en maakt ‘t uit, als de VS daarop actie zou ondernemen, waarbij mensen omkomen…….

De VS zette in 2006 al de eerste stappen tot het afzetten van Assad (WikiLeaks) en daarvoor is alles geoorloofd, zoals leugens in de wereld brengen, waarop men vervolgens actie kan ondernemen, een tactiek die al zo oud als de weg naar Rome is, en door de VS veelvuldig gebruikt….. Neem het Tonkin-incident, dat tot volledige deelname van de VS in de oorlog van Vietnam leidde, een oorlog waarbij de VS alleen in Vietnam al verantwoordelijk was (‘is’ zou meer gepast zijn) voor 2,5 miljoen Vietnamese doden…….

Daarnaast vermoordde de VS tijdens die oorlog een enorm aantal mensen in o.a. Cambodja en Laos…… Overigens gebruikte de VS in de Vietnamoorlog veelvuldig chemische wapens, waardoor ook nu nog steeds slachtoffers overlijden, o.a. mensen die hun leven lang al ziek zijn geweest door dat smerige gif (als Agent Orange, waarvan destijds in het Rotterdamse havencomplex een grote voorraad was opgeslagen….)………

Nu heeft de VS totaal voorbarig 59 kruisraketten afgeschoten op een Syrische luchtmachtbasis, één van de zetten, om het bewind van Assad omver te werpen…… De reguliere westerse media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici, waaronder PvdA opperflapdrol Koenders, hebben hun steun voor deze actie uitgesproken…….. Deze oorlogshitsers vinden het waarschijnlijk wel tof, als deze terreuraanval van de VS tot WOIII zal leiden…….

Lees en oordeel zelf:

What
the Media Isn’t Telling You About Yesterday’s Chemical Attack in
Syria


What the Media Isn’t Telling You About Yesterday’s Chemical Attack in Syria

April
5, 2017 at 11:00 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA) On
Tuesday, yet another chemical weapons
 attack
occurred in Syria
.
This particular attack took place in the Idlib province, and dozens
have reportedly died as a result.


Syria
is no stranger to chemical weapons attacks. In 2013, there were two
notably devastating attacks, both of which the Obama administration
used to try to justify a 
direct
strike on the Assad government
.


The
U.N. thoroughly investigated the first 2013 attack. The U.N
Commission of Inquiry’s Carla Del Ponte ultimately 
said the
evidence indicated the attack was carried out by the Syrian rebels —
not the Syrian government. Despite this, support for the Syrian
rebels from the U.S. and its allies 
only
increased
,
raising serious questions about Obama’s sincerity when condemning
chemical attacks.


Pulitzer-Prize
winning journalist Seymour Hersh found the second major attack was
committed in a 
similar
manner
.
Hersh found that the U.S. quite deliberately attempted to frame the
evidence to justify a strike on Assad without even considering
al-Nusra, a terror group with access to nerve agents that should have
been a prime suspect.


In
2016, the U.N.
 concluded that
the Syrian government had, indeed, used chemical weapons during the
years-long conflict, but that ISIS had, too. This is in light of the
fact that in 2013, the U.N. also 
declared that
the regime no longer possessed chemical weapons.


These
facts are largely missing from any serious commentary on the most
recent attack in Syria. Despite these reports being accessible and
available, the world has instead decided to blatantly ignore them and
rush to blame Assad once again. It is also worth noting that one of
the sources blaming Syria and/or Russia for this attack is the
so-called Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), an
organization
 run
by a single anti-Assad dissident in Coventry, England
.
Having these claims bolstered by the White Helmets does nothing to
aid its credibility given the group’s leadership is reportedly
driven by a “
pro-interventionist
agenda conceived by the Western governments and public relations
groups that back them
,” according to Alternet.


Yet
without directly confirming any of the intelligence, the media and
politicians are out in full force condemning the Assad government. As
of this article’s publication, the 
Guardian has
three top headlines: one reporting on the attack and the next two
condemning Assad directly (see
 here and here).


Even
a New Zealand newspaper, the 
New
Zealand Herald
,
ran an ambitious
 article entitled
“Donald Trump is the only leader who can stop Syrian atrocities.”
No – it is not 
The Onion.

In
the article, the writer ignores all of the aforementioned reports
regarding attacks in 2013, claiming that in that year, “the Syrian
regime used sarin.” She also claims “Obama did nothing” in
response.


The
claim that Obama “did nothing”
 makes
no sense
.
In 2016 alone, Obama
 dropped
over 26,000 bombs
 —
almost half of which landed in Syria. These bombs also rained on
Syrian troops in direct violation of international law.
 As
president, Obama also oversaw the CIA’s expenditures of about $1
billion a year training Syrian rebels
.


As
fears of “fake news” perpetuated by both the mainstream media and
the president threaten our democratic institutions, how else can we
describe these biased reports on Syria, if not “fake news?” News
should be based on evidence, not molded around a foreign policy
agenda of regime change.


Perhaps
the Syrian government did use chemical weapons in a stupid move that
would immediately attract international condemnation and calls for
war
 just
days after the U.S. openly acknowledged they would consider leaving
Assad alone
.
But what if the Syrian government wasn’t responsible, and the
attack was, once again, committed by the Syrian rebels? Will the
world unite and join
 Congresswoman
Tulsi Gabbard in her calls to stop arming terror groups in Syria
?


Or
is it that we only care about chemical weapons attacks if there is an
indication that the Syrian government was behind it?


One
should bear in mind that if the rebels did commit the attack, the
U.S. could actually do something about it considering America and its
allies actively support them. Withdrawing support for groups that
resort to these tactics would contribute to Syria’s safety and
security. This is not a concern, however, because it appears the
media’s ultimate focus on this story is to garner support for
further war and bloodshed in the Middle East — not less of it.

Creative
Commons
 Anti-Media Report
a typo

========================

Zie ook: ‘Koenders en SOHR melden gifgas aanval, reguliere media als NOS nemen bericht van SOHR (propaganda en ‘fake news’ orgaan) over

       en ‘De raketaanval van de VS op Syrische basis en de waarschuwingen van de Nationaal Coördinator Terrorismebestrijding……

       en: ‘Van Kappen (VVD) noemt ‘stapelaanwijzingen’ het bewijs en is blij met raketaanval VS op Syrische basis,  een aanval zonder enig echt bewijs voor Syrische schuld…….

       en: ‘Sico van der Meer (‘deskundige’ Clingendael) weet niet, dat Israël en Egypte grote hoeveelheden gifgas maken en op voorraad hebben……….

      en: ‘Rutte: raketaanval VS tegen Syrische basis was begrijpelijk en proportioneel, ook al is er geen bewijs voor Syrische schuld……..

      en: ‘Haley (VS ambassadeur bij VN) herhaalde in VN, voorafgaand aan raketaanval, het smerige spel van Powell in 2002, aanleiding tot illegale oorlog tegen Irak…….‘  

      en: ‘Sophie in ‘t Veld (D66): het afschieten door de VS van raketten op een Syrische basis ‘was even nodig………..’

     en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

      en: ‘Giro 555: honger en oorlog in Jemen: waarom worden Saoedi-Arabië, de VS en GB niet aan de paal genageld wegens enorme oorlogsmisdaden??’

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Syrië, de leugens die u op de mouw worden gespeld….. Ofwel: Syrië, de vuile oorlog en…….. deel 2

Hier een al wat ouder artikel, van Information Clearing House, aansluitend op een eerder bericht*, over de leugens die u bijna dagelijks over u uitgestort krijgt, door liegende politici, opiniemakers, ‘deskundigen’ en de reguliere landelijke media. Om te beginnen ‘de grote verrassing’ dat Rusland een groot deel van haar troepen terugtrekt uit Syrië, terwijl Putin dat een halfjaar geleden al aankondigde in The Telegraph. Daar stelde hij 5 maanden geleden, dat Rusland verwachtte de troepen na een een periode van 3 of 4 maanden terug te kunnen trekken!!

(U kunt voor een vertaling  onder het artikel klikken, dat neemt wel wat tijd in beslag).

Syria:
Things They Just Made Up

By
Kit



March
17, 2016 “
Information
Clearing House

– “
Off
Guardian
“-  The
Western MSM (reguliere media, AP) are all a flutter: Russia are pulling out of Syria (sort
of). They can’t quite decide if it’s a victory, or a defeat. They
don’t know if it’s because they ran out of money, are giving up,
or it’s all a big lie – but they all agree on two things: 1)
Russia have not achieved anything and 2) This is a massive a
surprise.

Such
a surprise that Putin announced the plan five months ago, in a story
printed in the Telegraph
. This is what the Western world has come
to, I suppose, if a politician SAYS he’s going to do something and
then actually DOES IT, this is…surprising. How sad.

The
Guardian are firmly of the belief that this is “A Bad Thing” –
in fact they are so against Russia leaving Syria, that one almost
forgets they were just as strongly against Russia entering Syria in
the first place. Because Russia and reasons.

Whether
in the petulant and childish summation
“written” by Shaun Walker
, or this
one of their ridiculous “Guardian view” editorials
 (written
anonymously, of course), the battle lines are being drawn: The fight
is with reality.

The
Walker piece is standard Walker-fare. Long on snide one-liners, short
on content. Long on narrative, short on evidence. He describes the
withdrawal as a move “analysts never saw coming” – presumably
because none of them read the Telegraph. It’s threaded throughout
with dishonest and inappropriate things:

the
end forever of the burgeoning bromance between the Turkish and
Russian presidents…”

A
less creative reporter, one with a sense of shame perhaps, would have
used the phrase “worsening of Russia-Turkish relations. Walker is
above such things – there is nothing so serious it can’t be
livened up with mockery and snarkiness. Not even war. He continues:

Not
to mention the repeated insistence that the Syria bombing has not
resulted in any civilian casualties, despite ever-mounting evidence
to the contrary.”

The
link to this “mounting evidence”? It’s a Guardian
aticle from 4 months ago
 – about a family who got bombed.
The rebel commanders and American “experts” (the only sources
quoted) know it was the Russians because “it happened at night”.

Oh
and then this:

But
if there is indeed now a withdrawal, it will prevent the Syria
mission from turning into a long, drawn-out affair with rising
Russian casualties.

Rising…from
three. Who were all killed by Turkey.

For
while it is true the mission of defeating Isis has not been
accomplished…

And
here, here we come to the most insidious and important lie. It’s a
theme that is repeated in“The
Guardian View..”
. The headline proclaims:

Russia’s
Syria U-turn: no kind of victory”

Which
is, literally, as factually incorrect as a statement can be. It is
not a U-Turn, observe the Telegraph link above, and it is certainly
kind of
victory.

If
there is one thing that Mr Putin’s announcement makes plain, it is
that Russia’s claim that it was moving into Syria to combat Islamic
State”

This
has been a favorite line in the press since the Russian operation
began – it is a lie. Russia never made such a claim. Sergey Lavrov,
on fighting
terrorism in Syria
, famously said:

If
it looks like a terrorist, walks like a terrorist, acts like a
terrorist…it’s a terrorist”

The
stated aim of the Russian intervention was assisting their ally in
combating terrorism and bringing a negotiated settlement to the
region – as they have been trying
to do since 2012
. Additionally, the Russian air force is
continuing to bomb ISIS and provide air support for the SAA advance
on Palmyra, and then Raqqa. To deny this – when evidence abounds –
is to be insane.

More
and more we see the Western, neocon narrative being propped up with
utterly baseless statements. From Obama’s foolish description
of a Syrian “quagmire”
, to the ridiculous idea Russia
were trying to unseat Merkel by flooding Europe with refugees
.
The collapse of analysis and rhetoric into hysteria betrays the
inherent dishonesty of the position. As a friend of mine is fond of
saying: If they honestly believed the truth to be on their side, they
would not feel the need to lie.

Maybe,
with Vietnam and Afghanistan and Iraq, western journalists have
forgotten that wars are not 
meant to
last – maybe years of reporting on American interventions, designed
to prolong conflict for the sake of profit margins, have scrubbed out
of our collective mind the idea that an action can be brief,
decisive and efficient
.

The
following are a list of facts totally ommitted from the Guardian
articles on Syria the last few days:

Huge
gains on the ground, destruction of the enemy supply lines,
destruction of enemy materiel, extended peace talks, refugees
returning home and a ceasefire agreement. This, in the Guardian view,
is “no kind of victory”. Which makes you wonder whose side they
are on.

Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

*    Zie: ‘Syrië, de vuile oorlog en alles wat u niet zou moeten weten. Een boek van Tim Anderson

Zie ook: ‘Palmyra ontzet, westerse media geven Rusland schoorvoetend ‘de eer…..’

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.

John Cusack: Barack Obama is ‘as bad or worse’ than George W Bush

Het volgende artikel komt uit The Guardian. Gelukkig zijn er een groot aantal bekende personen zijn, die hun mond open durven te trekken over de terreur die de VS in veel landen uitoefent. Dit artikel kwam ik tegen op het blog van Stan van Houcke. Het is, zoals u begrijpt in het Engels:

The actor has attacked the incumbent president’s approach to civil
liberties and his foreign policy, saying he has extended Bush’s wars

Cusack is a board member of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.

Cusack is a board member of the Freedom of the Press Foundation.
Photograph: Dave Kotinsky/Getty Images

John Cusack, the actor, writer and – increasingly – political pundit, has said Barack Obama
is “as bad or worse” than George W Bush when it comes to issues such as
the NSA, freedom of the press, civil liberties and drone strikes.

“Obama has extended and hardened the cement on a lot of Bush’s
post-9/11 Terror Inc policies, so he’s very similar to Bush in every way
that way,” he told the Daily Beast.

“He hasn’t started as many wars, but he’s extended the ones we had,
and I don’t even think Dick Cheney or Richard Nixon would say the
president has the right to unilaterally decide whom he can kill around
the world.”

Cusack, who has described Obama’s domestic social policy as “much better”,
has been a vocal opponent of the president’s foreign policy for much of
his term in office. In 2012, he published an interview with Jonathan
Turley, professor of law at the George Washington University law school,
which he prefaced with his thoughts on US military intervention in
Afghanistan and drone strikes in Pakistan.

“One is forced to ask the question: is the president just another Ivy
League asshole shredding civil liberties and due process and sending
people to die in some shithole for purely political reasons?” he wrote.

The actor has long been a champion of press freedom and sits on the board of the non-profit Freedom of the Press Foundation.
One of his fellow board members is the NSA whistleblower Edward
Snowden. Closer to home, he has attacked the film industry for its
attitude towards female stars, describing Hollywood as “a whorehouse”.

“I have actress friends who are being put out to pasture at 29,” he told the Guardian last year. “They just want to open up another can of hot 22. It’s becoming almost like kiddie porn. It’s fucking weird.”

Cusack next appears in Love & Mercy, a biopic of the Beach Boys’
Brian Wilson, directed by Bill Pohlad. Paul Dano plays Wilson in the
midst of recording the group’s seminal album, Pet Sounds, and Cusack
plays him in later life, when he was isolated following drug rehab and
under the powerful influence of his abusive therapist Eugene Landy.

Read a review of Love & Mercy

Partner Glenn Greenwald vastgehouden op Heathrow

Gisteren maakte Glenn Greenwald bekend, dat zijn partner David Miranda 9 uur lang op vliegveld Heathrow is vastgehouden, op grond van de Britse antiterreurwet. Miranda was daar, tijdens een tussenstop op zijn reis van Berlijn naar Rio de Janeiro. Dit is een ernstige aantasting van de persvrijheid, althans je kan dit niet anders interpreteren. Greenwald sprak met Snowden en publiceerde daarover in The Guardian. Zijn partner sprak in Berlijn met VS filmmaakster Laura Poitras, die zich ook bezighoudt met de documenten, die Snowden liet lekken. De laptop en andere elektronica werden door de Britten in beslag genomen……

Politiestaat VS eist en de rest van de wereld buigt gehoorzaam het hoofd, een hoofd waar zich een berg boter op bevindt……….