Als
je nog steeds in het sprookje ‘Russiagate’ gelooft heb je heel wat
echte informatie gemist, informatie zoals die in het hieronder opgenomen
artikel. Daarin wordt bericht over een bedrijf dat in de VS al aan de
Russische trollenweg heeft getimmerd, maar nu door de mand is gevallen
als de baas van een leger met nep-Russische bots…..
Ryan
Fox en Jonathan Morgan, die het bedrijf New Knowledge (cybersecurity
company) leiden, een bedrijf dat desinformatie online in de gaten
houdt, schreven op 6 november jl. een artikel in de New York Times,
waarin ze verhaalden over de Russische pogingen om de VS verkiezingen
te manipuleren……..
Ongelofelijk
als je ziet wat deze 2 leugenaars te berde brachten over de
zogenaamde Russische bemoeienis met de VS verkiezingen, ze gingen
zelfs zover te stellen dat Facebook en Twitter meer werden
‘misbruikt’ door de Russen, dan die 2 platforms zelf hebben
aangegeven..
De
reguliere media moeten zich de ogen uit de kop schamen, deze leugens zo hysterisch uit te venten als waarheid, waarbij ze de VS en haar
oorlogshond de NAVO helpen een oorlog te ontketenen tussen Rusland en
het westen, nu nog Koude Oorlog 2.0, echter de grens naar een ‘hete
oorlog’ met Rusland is dichterbij dan ooit tevoren, dichterbij dan
tijdens de eerste Koude Oorlog…..
De
feiten die aantonen dat Russiagate een ‘hoax’ is, zijn zo
grootschalig voorhanden, dat je niet begrijpt waar die reguliere
media het lef vandaan halen deze willens en wetens over het hoofd te
zien en het publiek warm te maken voor een oorlog tegen Rusland (die maar één uitkomst kan hebben: WOIII….),
nogmaals op basis van leugens (hetzelfde geldt overigens ook voor
China, dat door diezelfde media steeds vaker als misdadig wordt
neergezet middels leugencampagnes, waarbij men haat en angst zaait
tegen/voor dit land)
Lees het volgende artikel en zie hoe men de Russen meer en meer demoniseert, alles gebaseerd op dikke vette leugens, zeg maar zoals de VS met haar hielenlikkers in de rest van het westen oorlogen is gestart op basis van louter smerige leugens…….. In deze illegale oorlogen werden alleen deze eeuw al meer dan 2,5 miljoen mensen vermoord door de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde, de VS en haar terreurorganisatie NAVO………
Firm
That Warned Americans Of Russian Bots… Was Running An Army Of Fake
Russian Bots
by Tyler
Durden
Sun,
12/30/2018 – 15:15
Authored
by Danielle
Ryan,
The
co-founders of cybersecurity firm New Knowledge warned Americans in
November to “remain vigilant” in the face of “Russian efforts”
to meddle in US elections. This month, they have been exposed for
doing just that themselves.
Ryan
Fox and Jonathan Morgan, who run the New Knowledge cybersecurity
company which claims to “monitor
disinformation”online, penned a
foreboding op-ed in the New York Times on November 6, about “the
Russians” and
their nefarious efforts to influence American elections.
At
the time, it struck me that Fox and Morgan’s reasoning seemed a
little far-fetched. For example, one of the pieces of evidence
presented to prove that Russia had targeted American elections was
that lots of people had posted links to RT’s content online. Hardly
a smoking gun worthy of a Times oped.
Morgan
and Fox, intrepid cyber sleuths that they are, claimed in the article
they had detected more “overall
activity” from
ongoing Russian influence campaigns than social media companies like
Facebook and Twitter had yet revealed — or that other researchers
had been able to identify.
The
New Knowledge guys even authored a Senate Intelligence Committee
report on Russia’s alleged efforts to mess with American democracy.
They called
it a “propaganda
war against American citizens.” Impressive
stuff. They must be really good at their job, right?
This
week, however, we learned that New Knowledge was running its own
disinformation campaign (or “propaganda
war against Americans,” you
could say), complete with fake Russian bots designed to discredit
Republican candidate Roy Moore as a Russia-preferred candidate when
he was running for the US senate in Alabama in 2017.
The
scheme was
exposed by
the New York Times — the paper that just over a month earlier
published that aforementioned oped, in which Fox and Morgan
pontificated about Russian interference online.
New
Knowledge created a mini-army of fake Russian bots and fake Facebook
groups. The accounts, which had Russian names, were made to follow
Moore. An internal company memo boasted that New Knowledge
had “orchestrated
an elaborate ‘false flag’ operation that planted the idea that the
Moore campaign was amplified on social media by a Russian botnet.”
Moore
lost the race by 1.5 percent. To be fair, accusations published by
the Washington Post that he pursued underage girls back in the 1980s
may have had something to do with it as well, but that’s a
different story.
Of
course, New Knowledge and even the New York Times, which blew the lid
of the operation, are trying to spin this as some kind of “small
experiment” during
which they “imitated
Russian tactics” online
to see how they worked. Just for research, of course. They have also
both claimed that the scheme, dubbed ‘Project Birmingham’ had
almost no effect on the outcome of the race.
The
money for the so-called research project came from Reid Hoffman, the
billionaire co-founder of LinkedIn, who contributed $750,000 to
American Engagement Technologies (AET), which then spent $100,000 on
the New Knowledge experiment. After the scheme was exposed, Hoffman
offered a public
apology,
saying he didn’t know exactly how the money had been used and
admitting that the tactics were “highly
disturbing.”
If
people like Fox and Morgan actually cared about so-called Russian
meddling or the integrity of American elections, they would not have
run the deceptive campaign against Moore, no matter how undesirable
he was as a candidate. Their sneaky and deceitful methods are in
total contrast to the public profile they have cultivated for
themselves as a firm fighting the good fight for the public good. But
is it really that much of a surprise?
You
would think that a newspaper like the New York Times would have
cottoned on to the fact that guys like Fox and Morgan, with their
histories in
the US military and intelligence agencies, have clear agendas and are
not exactly squeaky clean or the most credible sources of information
when it comes to anything to do with Russia. But that kind of insight
or circumspection might be too much to ask for in the age of
Russiagate.
Facebook
removed Morgan’s account on Saturday for “engaging
in coordinated inauthentic behavior” around
the Alabama election. Three days after publishing its initial article
on the scandal (the one in which it played down the effects of New
Knowledge’s disinfo campaign), the New York Times published
a follow-up
piece about
the Facebook removal, in which it admitted that the controversy would
be a “stinging
embarrassment” for
the social media researcher, noting that he had been a “leading
voice” against
supposed Russian disinformation campaigns.
In
Fox and Morgan’s original NYT oped, they warned of the
ubiquitous “Russia-linked
social media accounts” and
estimated that “at
least hundreds of thousands, and perhaps even millions” of
US citizens had engaged with them online. One must now wonder, were
they including their own fake Russian bots in that count, or were
they leaving those ones out?
It’s
nearly two years into the Trump presidency and still we have no solid
evidence that the Russian “collusion” theory
is anything more than a fantasy concocted by Democrats desperate to
provide a more palatable reason for Hillary Clinton’s loss than the
fact that she simply ran a bad campaign.
In
fact, at this point, we actually have more solid and irrefutable
evidence of election meddling from the likes of dodgy American and
British companies like Cambridge
Analytica and
New Knowledge than we do of any meddling orchestrated by Russia.
================================
Zie ook:
‘Two More Spiegel Employees Out After Fake News Scandal Expands‘ Ofwel: het zoveelste ‘gevalletje fake news’, gebracht door de reguliere massamedia……..
‘Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen‘
‘Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’‘
‘BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘
‘Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’‘
‘Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega’s voor zot uitgemaakt‘
‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!‘
‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……‘
‘Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden‘
‘Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax‘
‘Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!‘
‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..‘
‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..‘
‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’‘
‘Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen‘
‘Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering‘ (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er ‘metersdikke’ dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikiLeaks)
‘FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information‘
‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election‘
‘Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd‘
‘Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt‘
‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘
‘WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia‘
‘Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!‘
‘VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!‘
‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media‘
‘Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)
‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….‘
‘Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat‘
‘‘Russiagate’ een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten…….‘
‘VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein…..‘
‘De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………‘
‘Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden‘
‘The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media‘
‘The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq‘
‘New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!‘
‘Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times‘
‘‘Fake News’ misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media‘
