Nederlandse Patriot-raketten in Turkije: tijd voor een strafrechtelijk onderzoek

Na alle gedoe met Turkije, de Turkse propagandaministers die vorig jaar toegang tot Nederland werd geweigerd (om reclame voor de reli-fascistische slachter Erdogan te maken) en de excuses die de totaal mislukte VVD tophufter Zijlstra daarvoor maakte, wordt het tijd om eens te kijken naar de Nederlandse Patriot missie van een paar jaar geleden in Turkije.

Na die excuses van Zijlstra volgde de officiële terugtrekking van de Nederlandse ambassadeur uit Ankara (terwijl deze allang niet meer in Turkije was) en blijven er nog wel wat vragen openstaan, zeker gezien de huidige illegale oorlog die Turkije nu in Syrië tegen de Koerden van de YPG voert…….. (terwijl deze groepering tot op heden nooit ook maar één doel in Turkije, of een Turks doel in het buitenland heeft aangevallen…..)

Weet je nog dat Nederland in 2012 besloot Patriot-raketten inclusief personeel te stationeren in Turkije, dit tegen agressie van het Assad regime……. Niet dat Syrië dreigde Turkije aan te vallen, nee dat verzon de Turkse Erdogan dictatuur zelf en als grootste slijmbal uit de klas, nam Nederland het voortouw……

Wat was men in de reguliere media en politiek trots op onze ‘verdediging’ van Turkije, terwijl men dondersgoed wist dat Assad allesbehalve gemotiveerd was Turkije aan te vallen…… Immers de VS had een opstand weten te organiseren in zijn land (al door de VS e.a. voorbereid vanaf 2006, zoals uit documenten blijkt) en had daarvoor zelfs buitenlandse strijders, o.a. van IS, vervoerd richting Syrië, m.a.w. Assad had zijn handen vol……..

Terwijl onze raketten op Turks grondgebied stonden, heeft dit land minstens 1 keer illegaal Syrisch grondgebied aangevallen, waarna deze reli-fascistische dictatuur zelfs een illegale inval in Irak pleegde, waar het maandenlang weigerde te vertrekken, dit op aandringen van Irak en de VN……

Kortom onze politici en media waren er trots op, dat Nederland Turkije rugdekking gaf met raketten, alles betaald met jouw en mijn belastinggeld……..

Te zot voor woorden en een (echt onafhankelijk) strafrechtelijk onderzoek meer dan waard!!

Over deze Turkse agressie gesproken: bij de inval van Turkije in Syrië is al een groot aantal (ook burger-) slachtoffers gevallen >> hoe is het mogelijk dat Turkije haar gang kan gaan met deze enorme oorlogsmisdaad (het illegaal binnenvallen van Syrië en vermoorden van een groot aantal mensen) en de wereld wegkijkt……. Terwijl Syrië volkomen terecht haar grondgebied wil zuiveren van terroristisch geteisem, dat NB de bevolking van Ghouta terroriseerde, wordt dit land daarvoor internationaal aan de paal genageld (met behulp van een groot aantal leugens)…….

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

‘Russische manipulatie van politiek in de VS’, maar geen woord als Netanyahu dit zelfs openlijk op de VS tv doet…….

Had
zelf al eens geschreven over de totale hysterie en hypocrisie in de VS en de rest van het westen over de zogenaamde bemoeienis van Rusland met de verkiezingen in de
VS en elders. Gisteren ontving ik echter een schrijven van Scott Roth die dit veel beter verwoordt.

Nog even dit: ondanks
dat daar nog geen flinter van bewijs voor is, blijven de reguliere
westerse media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici de leugens over Russische interventie in de verkiezingen herhalen. 

Vreemd genoeg interesseert het blijkbaar niemand als
de fascistische Palestijnenslachter Netanyahu hetzelfde doet (zoals in augustus vorig jaar), maar dan open en bloot, vertoond door de grote tv stations in de VS (beelden die zelfs in de rest van het westen werden getoond..), waar Netanyahu e.e.a. ook nog eens verwoordde in een ontmoeting met leden van het Congres….. (hoeveel echt bewijs voor manipulatie heb je nodig…?)

Ongelofelijk………

February
20, 2018

Dear Reader,

Last
week Robert Mueller, the special counsel investigating alleged
Russian interference in the 2016 presidential election, handed down
an indictment that charged thirteen Russian individuals and three
companies with all sorts of misdeeds in an effort to subvert the
election and swing it for Donald Trump. 

Whatever you think about the
issue of Russian intervention in our politics, it ought to be a
scandal how 
clear-cut
Israeli influence
 in
our politics is nothing but a sideshow, if even that. It’s
axiomatic in mainstream media attitudes about Israel that the
discussion will not meet the issues head-on, and the opinion makers
will invariably 
protect
Israel by shifting blame elsewhere
.
It’s a necessary and dare I say effective strategy because if the
mainstream press told the 
truth
about the quotidian violence
 of
the occupation, soon after a critical mass of Americans would
understand that reality and 
attitudes
like this would be the new norm.

Ayelet
Shaked, Israel’s Justice Minister, basically laid out the case
against Zionism
and
as Israel’s military-form of justice is administered in occupied
Palestine, 17-year-old 
Ahed
Tamimi’s
 case
keeps getting delayed. The judge announced the trial would be held
behind closed doors, as this would be in the 
“best
interest”
 of
a juvenile defendant. Orwell couldn’t have written this story if he
tried.

Have a pleasant week,Scott
Roth
Publisher,
Mondoweiss

Nederland roept officieel ambassadeur terug uit Turkije, charme offensief van Zijlstra mislukt door spanningen in Syrië…….

BBC World Service meldde in het radionieuws van 15.00 u. (CET) dat Nederland de ambassadeur van Turkije nu officieel heeft teruggeroepen uit Turkije, voorts heeft Nederland de nieuwe gezant van Turkije afgewezen (en die is dus niet welkom in Nederland)…… De Nederlandse ambassadeur werd door Turkije in maart vorig jaar uitgewezen, toen deze niet in het land was. Als ik me niet vergis stond deze Turkse uitzetting nog steeds.

Zijne kwaadaardigheid VVD opperhufterZijlstra, die minister van Buitenlandse Zaken mag spelen in Rutte 3, was eind november en begin december (2017) al bezig met een charme offensief richting Turkije. Zijlstra heeft schijt aan mensenrechten en aangezien die op grote schaal worden geschonden in Turkije, was dit geen belemmering voor zijn stroopsmeerderij bij de kalief van Ankara, de reli-fascist Erdogan, van wie hij zelfs de reet wel schoon wilde likken voor hernieuwde banden…..

Zo heeft Zijlstra zelfs excuus aangeboden voor de gebeurtenissen voorafgaand aan de Turkse verkiezingen vorig jaar….. (je weet wel het tegenhouden van een 2 Turkse ministers die hier Erdogan propaganda wilden verspreiden)

Blijkbaar loopt het conflict tussen de VS en Turkije over de ‘YPG Koerden’ in Syrië verder op* en zoals je wellicht weet: Nederland doet alles wat de VS verlangt. Niet onbelangrijk in deze: Nederland is de grootste buitenlandse investeerder in Turkije……. Overigens steekt het de VS ook, dat Turkije meer en meer naar Rusland en China kijkt als partners op militair gebied, waarmee de NAVO één van haar belangrijkste partners (zeker wat betreft de geologische ligging) dreigt te verliezen (De NAVO is goed bezien eigenlijk een organisatie van de VS…)….

* De VS steunt deze Koerdische beweging, die een autonoom gebied in Syrië nastreven, terwijl Turkije dit wil voorkomen middels een onlangs gepleegde illegale inval in Syrië (illegale oorlogsvoering), waar Turkije de Koerden bevecht en waarmee levens van VS militairen gevaar lopen…….

Pompeo (CIA opperhoofd met koperen fluit): heeft alle aanwijzingen dat Rusland de midterm verkiezingen zal manipuleren……

De CIA houdt zich sinds enige tijd ook bezig met het voorspellen van de toekomst, niet vreemd voor een terreurorgaan dat oneindig veel vaker liegt dan de waarheid spreekt.

Het BBC World Service radionieuws van 1.00 u. afgelopen nacht, bracht het nieuws dat opperhufter en massamoordenaar Pompeo, directeur van de CIA, alle aanwijzingen heeft en het erop lijkt dat Rusland de VS ‘midterm’ verkiezingen later dit jaar zal manipuleren. Met andere woorden: deze plork heeft als bewijs voor z’n toekomstvoorspelling ‘aanwijzingen’ waardoor het erop lijkt dat Rusland ‘alweer’ verkiezingen in de VS zal manipuleren……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ten eerste is er geen greintje bewijs voor eerdere Russische manipulaties (ook het laatste Volkskrant/Nieuwsuur verhaal aangaande Russiagate is apekool…*) en ten tweede zou men in Rusland wel helemaal knettergek zijn geworden als men inderdaad zou proberen de VS verkiezingen te manipuleren, zeker na alle leugens die de VS en anderen hierover hebben geventileerd in de westerse massamedia…….

Wel geeft dombo Pompeo met zijn belachelijke praatje aan dat zijn CIA al bezig is met het verzamelen van non-bewijs om Rusland weer als de kwaaie pier aan te wijzen…….. Niet zo moeilijk als je de VS documenten ziet die zijn opgeslagen onder Vault 7 en 8 op Wikileaks. Daaruit blijkt dat de VS andere landen of bedrijven kan hacken en een spoor achter kan laten dat bijvoorbeeld leidt naar Russische servers, dan wel naar de Russische geheime dienst……

‘Een mooie manier’ van oorlogshitsen tegen Rusland, immers de militaire Trump administratie (of eigenlijk: junta) heeft gesteld dat een aanval met kernwapens kan worden overwogen, bij een cyberaanval op de VS……** Dit terwijl er alleen keiharde bewijzen zijn voor dergelijke acties begaan door…. de VS zelf tegen landen die men daar als vijandig beschouwt!

Daarover gesproken, kernwapens: Pompeo stelde dat het nog maar een paar maanden duurt voordat Noord-Korea werkende kernraketten heeft waarmee het doelen in de VS kan raken……… (dus het wordt tijd voor ‘actie’ van de VS…) Terwijl Trump en Tillerson hebben gesteld dat ze een eind willen maken aan de zoektocht naar kernwapens door Noord-Korea, m.a.w.: Noord-Korea heeft geen werkende atoombom!!! Een enorme fout van Trump en later Tillerson, om dit toe te geven! Echter dit zou wel stroken met het feit dat nog geen land heeft geconstateerd dat er radioactieve straling te meten was boven de plek waar Noord-Korea haar ondergrondse ‘kernproeven’ hield. Dit is in de dagen na zo’n proef te meten, zelfs middels satellieten en daarvan gaan er dagelijks wel ‘een paar’ over Noord-Korea……

*  Zie: ‘Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

** Zie: ‘VS sluit een nucleaire aanval niet uit als een mogelijke reactie op een ‘cyberaanval…….’

Zie ook: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

        en: ‘Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

        en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

        en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

        en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

        en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

        en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

        en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

        en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

         en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

         en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

         en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

         en: Wall Street Journal wil punt achter Russiagate

         en: ‘De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

         en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

         en: ‘Trumps uitlating over de atoomknop en de onverschilligheid bij zijn achterban, een dictatuur waardig………

        en: ‘VS op weg naar daadwerkelijk gebruik van het kernwapen…………..‘ (plus twee andere Engelstalige artikelen)

        en: ‘NAVO oefent op een nucleaire aanval tegen ‘een denkbeeldige vijand’, ofwel Rusland……….

       en: ‘Trumps beleid t.a.v. kernwapens brengt de VS staatsveiligheid in gevaar (en die van de rest van de wereld)

Dan nog over het bedreigen van Noord-Korea door Trump met ‘Fire and Fury): ‘Noord-Korea verkeerd begrepen: het land wordt bedreigd door de VS, dat alleen deze eeuw al minstens 4 illegale oorlogen begon……..‘   en: ‘Trumps atoomknop is groter dan die van Kim Yung-un, bovendien werkt de VS knop wel……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘   en: ‘VS bezig met de voorbereiding van een militaire aanval op Noord-Korea……….

En om nog even te herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS, die niet op een illegale oorlog meer of minder kijkt:  ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States‘    

Reagan middels manipulaties tot president gekozen; waarom de gijzelaars in Iran moesten wachten op hun vrijheid….

Gisteren was het 37 jaar geleden dat Ronald Reagan een ‘c-acteur’ en d-politicus president werd van de VS. Diezelfde dag liet Iran de VS gijzelaars vrij die 444 dagen vast hadden gezeten in de VS ambassade van Teheran.

Nog steeds spreekt men over het succes dat Reagan boekte met de vrijlating van de gijzelaars. Zoals veel ‘gekozen-presidenten’ bemoeide het team van Reagan zich na de verkiezingsoverwinning, maar voor de inauguratie van Reagan (als president), met de gaande politiek en in dit geval o.a. met de onderhandelingen die president Carters administratie voerde met de Iraniërs. Dat is te zeggen, buiten medeweten van die administratie (en reken maar met de hulp van de CIA…)…….

Met wapens in ruil voor het vasthouden van de gijzelaars tot na de verkiezingen, stal opperploert Reagan de verkiezingen. Deze schoft liet de gijzelaars zelfs vastzitten tot zijn inauguratie op 20 januari, waar zijn administratie later bij verzon, dat de Iraniërs Carter een softie vonden en bang waren voor Reagan en daarom de gijzelaars vrij hebben gelaten op de dag dat hij werkelijk president werd……….

Echter de waarheid is heel anders: Iran was de hele gijzelingskwestie meer dan zat en begon de onderhandelingen met het team van president Carter.

Over manipulaties van verkiezingen gesproken: daar heeft men in de VS de Russen in het geheel niet voor nodig……….

Hier het bericht van Brasscheck TV met video’s over deze zaak:

THE OCTOBER SURPRISE

On
January 20, 1980, just minutes after Ronald Reagan was inaugurated,
Iran released US hostages it had held for 444 days.

The
timing was weird to say the least.

What
did this strange timing mean?

How
Reagan became president

A
FRAUD FROM DAY ONE

The
Secret Government
The
treasonous Bush family

We’re
reviewing a crucial decade in American history…

The
1980s.

This
was the decade that federal government criminality went into high
gear.

Ad
it all started with an act of fraud and high treason, a kind of
bloodless coup.

Gary
Sick, a retired Naval Captain wrote “All Fall Down,” and claimed
that in October 1980 Ronald Reagan made a deal with Iran to prevent
American hostages from being released until after Election Day. 
As
payback, the US arranged for Israel to give arms to Iran.

=======================

Zie ook hoe de VS nu bezig is met  pogingen om een oorlog tegen Iran te beginnen, alles overgoten met de gebruikelijke leugens van de VS, de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde:

      ‘Rubio wrongly credits Reagan for 1981 release of hostages from Iran

en: ‘With Veiled Regime Change Threats, Trump and NeoCons Blasted for Exploiting Iran Protests

en: ‘US Empire Is Running The Same Script With Iran That It Ran With Libya, Syria‘  

en: ‘Nikki Haley (VS ambassadeur in de VN) bedreigt sjiitisch Iran met militair ingrijpen……‘ (klik ook de links onder dat bericht)

en: ‘VS liegt schaamteloos om het westen verder op te zetten tegen Iran……..

en: ‘Protesten Iran opgezet door de VS en Israël

en: ‘Iran, de protesten en wat de media je niet vertellen………

en: ‘Iraanse protesten allesbehalve compleet spontaan (zoals VS ambassadeur bij de VN Haley durfde te stellen…)….

Mensen, dit was het voor vandaag, morgen meer berichten, maak er een mooie dag van!

Oprah Winfrey als president, is de VS compleet gek geworden?

Op
de Intercept publiceerde Mehdi Hasan afgelopen maandag een artikel
waarin hij zich al in de kop afvraagt of we helemaal gek zijn geworden,
door nu Oprah Winfrey, u weet wel o.a. notoire belastingontduiker en
presentator van een praatprogramma, als toekomstig president van te VS te zien……

Hasan
vergelijkt een aantal presidenten en stelt dan dat Winfrey, die o.a.
wel stabiel is i.t.t. Trump, een grote verademing zou zijn op Trump
al leg je daarmee de lat wel erg laag…… Bovendien is ze geen
seksist, of een fascist en wordt ze niet verdacht van het heulen met
‘de vijand’, zoals in het geval van Trump en Rusland…… Dat
laatste had Hasan niet moeten zeggen, hij zou moeten weten dat dit
gelul is van de democraten in samenwerking met een paar geheime diensten……. Het was zeker na de val van de Sovjet-Unie
bijna gebruikelijk voor de komende administratie, als met Israël ook
te overleggen met Rusland; dit had Hasan kunnen weten.

Voorts
stelt Hasan dat we (in de VS. Ap) niet nog een president nodig hebben
die een niet gekozen generaal en Goldman Sachs een deel van het werk
laat doen…….. Hasan moet toch weten dat Trump bepaald niet de
eerste president is, die ofwel het leger min of meer liet beslissen
wat te doen (waarna het werd gebracht als was het een plan van de
president) en de banken de vrije hand gaf….

Maakt
verder niet uit Hasan schreef een uiterst informatief stuk, waarin
hij filosofeert en uiteindelijk stelt dat de VS echt geen tweede
nitwit als Trump nodig heeft, een tweede steenrijke figuur, die deels
het eigenbelang zal laten prevaleren……..

Lees
en oordeel zelf:

Oprah
Winfrey for President: Have We All Gone Bonkers?

BEVERLY HILLS, CA - JANUARY 07:  In this handout photo provided by NBCUniversal, Oprah Winfrey accepts the 2018 Cecil B. DeMille Award   speaks onstage during the 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on January 7, 2018 in Beverly Hills, California.  (Photo by Paul Drinkwater/NBCUniversal via Getty Images)

Photo:
Paul Drinkwater/NBCUniversal/Getty Images

Mehdi
Hasan
contact: Twitter @mehdirhasan

January
8, 2018

HAVE
WE ALL
 gone
bonkers?

On
Sunday evening, 
#Oprah2020 began
trending on social media after Oprah Winfrey delivered a 
rousing
speech
 against
misogyny and racism at the Golden Globe Awards. While Oprah has in
the past 
ruled
out
 running
for public office, her longtime partner Stedman Graham just told the
Los Angeles Times that 
“she
would absolutely do it,”
 and
CNN is reporting that Oprah is 
“actively
thinking”
 about
running for president.


Is #Oprah2020 really
a serious thing?

Do
people honestly consider the talk-show-host-turned-media-mogul to be
a viable or appropriate candidate to run against fellow celebrity
billionaire Donald Trump in three years? “I have no idea if Oprah
would be a good candidate or president,” former Obama speechwriter
Jon Favreau 
wrote
on Twitter
,
“but dismissing her out of hand because Trump is a celebrity seems
short-sighted.”

Really?
I’m old enough to remember when liberals gave a damn about
experience, qualifications, and judgement; when Democrats mocked the
idea of Trump — a former reality TV star and property developer
who 
struggled
to tell the difference between Hamas and Hezbollah
 —
running for the presidency.

On
the campaign trail, former President Barack Obama blasted Trump as
uniquely
unqualified
,”
lacking in “
basic
knowledge

and “
woefully
unprepared

to do the job of commander-in-chief. In stark contrast, 
he
argued
,
there had “never been a man or a woman more qualified than Hillary
Clinton to serve as president of the United States of America.”

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 20:  U.S. President Barack Obama awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Oprah Winfrey in the East Room at the White House on November 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Presidential Medal of Freedom is the nation's highest civilian honor, presented to individuals who have made meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors. Also pictured is Mario Molina (L). (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

President
Barack Obama awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Oprah
Winfrey in the East Room at the White House on Nov. 20, 2013 in
Washington.Photo:
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Clinton
called Trump “
totally
unqualified
,”
while an op-ed from the New York Times editorial board, headlined
Why
Donald Trump Should Not Be President
,”
pointed out that the GOP candidate “has no experience in national
security.” Three days after the election, Vox ran a
piece 
headlined,
“Donald Trump is the only U.S. president ever with no political or
military experience.”

Well,
dear liberals and Democrats, guess what? President Winfrey would be
the second such president. Is this really what most Americans want or
what the United States government needs? Another clueless celebrity
in possession of the nuclear codes? Another billionaire mogul
who 
doesn’t
like paying taxes
 in
charge of the economy? And how would it be anything other than sheer
hypocrisy for Democrats to offer an unqualified, inexperienced
presidential candidate to the American electorate in 2020, given all
that they said about Trump in 2016?

Granted,
Oprah isn’t a 
raging
narcissist
 or
racist
bigot
;
she doesn’t have ties to white nationalists, isn’t accused of
colluding with a foreign government, and hasn’t been caught on tape
admitting to sexual assault.

Oprah
would be a far superior, smarter, and more stable president than
Trump in every imaginable way. But that, of course, is a
low, 
low bar.

As
CNBC’s Christina Wilkie, in a rare dissent on Twitter, 
put
it
:
“I love to watch Oprah saying inspirational things on television.
But also I love to watch people who have political experience being
elected to national office.”

What
about former Hollywood actor Ronald Reagan, some Oprah supporters
might say? The Gipper, however, was also a former two-term governor
from California. Obama, also accused of being a political lightweight
when he ran for president, was a sitting senator, former
constitutional law professor, and author of two acclaimed books on
politics and policy. Even the know-nothing George W. Bush had won two
gubernatorial elections in Texas before throwing his hat in the
presidential ring in 2000.

Prior
to Trump, the only presidents to 
never
have served in public office
 prior
to being elected to the White House were Zachary Taylor, Ulysses S.
Grant, and Dwight Eisenhower. The first won the Mexican-American War;
the second, the Civil War; and the third, the Second World War.

Does
Oprah have anything on her resume to compare with that? Is 
emoting
on TV
 and handing
out free cars
 —
even if it is, admittedly, part of building an impressive
multi-billion-dollar media empire from scratch — really an
acceptable substitute for political or military experience? Is that
how debased the political culture has become?

MEYERTON, HENLEY ON KLIP - JANUARY 14:  Oprah Winfrey poses with the Graduates at the inaugural graduation of the class of 2011 at Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls on January 14, 2012 in Henley on Klip, South Africa.  (Photo by Michelly Rall/Getty Images)

Oprah
Winfrey poses at the inaugural graduation of the class of 2011 at
Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls on Jan. 14, 2012 in Henley
on Klip, South Africa.

 Photo:
Michelly Rall/Getty Images

DO
I SOUND
 elitist?
Perhaps. But what’s wrong with wanting people with intellect,
experience, and qualifications to fill the most important jobs? As
Oprah’s fellow celebrity liberal Jon Stewart 
once
said
:
“Not only do I want an elite president, I want someone who’s
embarrassingly superior to me, somebody who speaks 16 languages and
sleeps two hours a night hanging upside down in a chamber they
themselves designed.”

Well,
the Oprah fans might argue, she could surround herself with big
brains. But isn’t that the argument that Trump supporters make,
too? Do we really want another president deferring to 
unelected
generals
 and Goldman
Sachs
?
And do we think a talk-show host who promoted the careers of
hucksters 
Dr.
Phil and Dr. Oz
,
while also 
giving
a platform
 to
the anti-science lunacy of actresses Jenny McCarthy and Suzanne
Somers, is capable of constructing a Lincoln-esque 
“Team
of Rivals”
?
A political and economic “Justice League?” Come. Off. It.

To
be clear: I am not saying that Oprah can’t, or won’t, be
president. Predictions are for fools, and Trump has proved that
anything is possible.

Oprah’s
supporters — rightly — might point to her strong record on
standing up to racism and misogyny, not to mention her inspirational
oratory and backstory. Her 
record
on Iraq
 is
better than Clinton’s; she once even 
hosted
a show on universal health care
 with
Michael Moore. It might also seem like an act of divine justice if
Trump, hero to white nationalists and neo-Nazis, was replaced by a
strong black woman.

Oprah’s
critics — also rightly — might point to her 
fronting
for global corporations
 and
her role as “
one
of the world’s best neoliberal capitalist thinkers
.”
They might ask: What is Oprah’s position on drone strikes in
Pakistan? On supporting the Saudi war in Yemen? On cap and trade?
Single-payer? Tax reform? Does she have a plan for Middle East peace?
Could a person who once seemed surprised that Indian people still
eat
with their hands

really defuse a nuclear crisis on the Indian subcontinent?

But
we have to go beyond the pros and cons of an Oprah presidency — I
can’t believe I just typed that line — and consider some broader
questions: How much damage is U.S. celebrity culture doing to U.S.
politics? Why don’t ideologies, or even ideas, seem to matter
anymore? Shouldn’t progressives be making the case for the virtues
of government and collective action and, therefore, the importance of
electing people of ability, experience, and expertise to high office?
Shouldn’t they be arguing that billionaire TV stars have no
business running for the most powerful job on planet Earth,
regardless of whether they are an orange man called Trump or a black
woman called Oprah?

Some
pundits have suggested that the Democrats can’t win without a
celebrity candidate like Oprah in 2020. “If you need to set a thief
to catch a thief,” neoconservative John Podhoretz wrote in a 
New
York Post op-ed
 in
September 2017 that was 
retweeted by
Oprah herself, “you need a star — a grand, outsized, fearless
star whom Trump can neither intimidate nor outshine — to catch a
star.”

This
simply isn’t true. In August 2017, 
Public
Policy Polling
found
Trump trailed Joe Biden (by 15 points), Bernie Sanders (14 points),
Elizabeth Warren (7 points), Cory Booker (5 points), and Kamala
Harris (1 point) in potential 2020 match-ups. Last month, an 
NBC/Wall
Street Journal poll 
found
Trump would lose to a “Generic Democrat” in 2020 by a whopping 16
points.

If
five different senators plus a Generic Democrat can beat this
Republican president, then why the liberal excitement over a
talk-show host? And why draw the line at Oprah? What about 
Mark
Zuckerberg
Mark
Cuban
Dwayne
“The Rock” Johnson
Kanye?
Where, oh where, does it end?

The
liberal response to the rise of Trump cannot and should not be “let’s
find our own bigger, better version of The Donald.” As columnist
Emily Arrowood 
wrote in
May 2016: “That Trump is acutely unqualified would be true even if
he were Mr. Congeniality, a champion of the people with the
aspirations of Jimmy Stewart in ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.’”

The
irony is that Oprah may, in fact, 
be Ms.
Congeniality. But she is still as “acutely unqualified” as Trump.
Let’s get a grip, folks.

Top
photo: In this handout photo provided by NBCUniversal, Oprah Winfrey
speaks onstage during the 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards at the
Beverly Hilton Hotel on Jan. 7, 2018 in Beverly Hills, Calif.

McMaster: Rusland manipuleert de Mexicaanse verkiezingen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Nadat
CIA directeur Mike Pompeo eerder al beweerde dat de Russen de VS congresverkiezingen van 2018 hebben gemanipuleerd (jazeker, die
moeten nog plaatsvinden!! ha! ha!), kwam flapdrol McMaster met het
bericht dat Rusland de komende Mexicaanse presidentsverkiezingen manipuleert…… 
Het Witte Huis weigert verder commentaar te leveren op deze grove en smerige beschuldiging……

Je hebt het vast al geraden: er is niet een flinter bewijs
geleverd voor deze stellingen, je roept ‘t gewoon een keer of
honderd, geholpen door de reguliere (massa-) media, gesteund door het grootste
deel van de westerse politici en het gros van de mensen gelooft de leugen…… 

De
Mexicaanse media hebben de regerende PRI partij beschuldigd van het
bezig zijn met het manipuleren van de komende verkiezingen, de
zittende regering heeft zelfs de wetgeving aangepast mocht het
vanwege deze manipulaties tot grote protesten komen na de
verkiezingen….. 
Echter zoals je begrijpt heeft dit niets, maar dan
ook helemaal niets met Rusland te maken……

Moet je nagaan: er zijn bewijzen te over dat de VS verkiezingen elders manipuleert, sterker nog, zelfs democratisch gekozen regeringen laat afzetten door manipulaties van o.a. de CIA…….. (‘democratie brengen’, de code die het leger aan foute oorlogshitsende VS politici gebruikt, als de VS weer een bloedige illegale oorlog begint…)

Lees
het volgende bericht van Jason Ditz, geplaatst op ANTIWAR:

McMaster:
Russia Meddling in Mexico’s Election

White
House Declines to Offer Details on Accusation

Jason
Ditz
Januari 7, 2018 McMaster
MexicoRussia

A
video clip has emerged from a recent talk by National Security
Adviser H.R. McMaster, is which he accused Russia of “a 
sophisticated
effort”
 to
meddle in the upcoming Mexican elections.


Putin en de Mexicaanse president Nieto

McMaster
claimed that the public had seen “initial signs” of such
meddling, but did not elaborate in the talks. The White House has
subsequently refused to comment on the accusation.

Recent
media reports have 
suggested
that the ruling PRI has been setting the stage for a rigged 
election,
with changes to the internal security laws made supposedly to prevent
larger protests in such an eventuality.

The
problem is, such allegations haven’t had even a plausible
connection to Russia, and the US claims seem based on just the
ongoing US supposition that Russia would want to be involved in
anything. In keeping with that, CIA Director Mike
Pompeo 
accused Russia
of interfering in the 2018 US Congressional elections, even though
campaigning hasn’t really even started in that case.

Last
5 posts by Jason Ditz

Catalonië: Spaanse koning Flip VI roept Catalanen in zijn kersttoespraak op tot verdraagzaamheid en en eenheid……..

Het BBC World Service radionieuws van 1.00 u. vannacht bracht het bericht dat de Spaanse Koning Felipe VI in zijn kersttoespraak de Catalanen opriep tot stabiliteit verdraagzaamheid en eenheid……

Verder noemde de plork Felipe de Spaanse democratie volwassen….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, heel normaal om in een democratie een provincie delen van haar autonomie af te nemen en het streven naar onafhankelijkheid, dat al een paar honderd jaar bestaat, misdadig te noemen (daar kom ik zo op terug)…….

De meerderheid van de Catalanen is voor onafhankelijkheid, dat bleek onlangs uit de verkiezingsuitslag van de regionale Catalaanse verkiezingen, die Rajoy in feite ongrondwettelijk had uitgeschreven….. Deze uitslag was dan ook een slag in het gezicht van Rajoy en Felipe….* (Rajoy rekende op een grote winst voor zijn eigen partij en een afstraffing van de onafhankelijkheidscoalitie, echter het tegendeel voltrok zich: de onafhankelijken boekten tegen de verwachting in een overwinning, terwijl zijn partij, de Partido Popular, wegzakte en nog maar 3 zetels kreeg…!!)

De ploert Felipe durfde zelfs te zeggen dat je ideeën niet kan opleggen aan anderen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Dat is nu juist wat de fascistische neoliberaal en premier van het land doet in het geval van Catalonië….. Sterker nog: hij stelt dat het referendum, een uiterste vorm van democratische zeggenschap, misdadig is…….

Overigens, heeft Felipe dit eerder zelf ook gezegd, het onafhankelijkheidsreferendum is ‘ongrondwettelijk’ dus zwaar misdadig……..** Puigdemont, is de Catalaanse ex-premier, die naar Brussel vluchtte, daar de autocraat Rajoy zijn kabinetsleden gevangen zette…. Hij stelde volkomen terecht, dat Felipe eerst maar eens zijn excuses moet aanbieden voor zijn onbeschofte commentaar na het onafhankelijkheidsreferendum in Catalonië, iets dat Felipe ‘uiteraard’ niet heeft gedaan……..

De NOS kwam op haar site met de volgende uitspraak, die Felipe in zijn kersttoespraak deed: “Respect voor de beginselen en waarden van de rechtsstaat zijn essentieel om de grondwettelijke beginselen van vrijheid, gelijkheid en rechtvaardigheid te waarborgen……” ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Vreemd dan toch dat de Catalanen allesbehalve worden gezien als gelijken, dit bleek eens te meer nadat Rajoy in 2006 Catalonië een aantal autonome statuten af heeft genomen…..* Om over rechtvaardigheid en gelijkheid maar helemaal te zwijgen……

Nee, echt een ‘geweldige kersttoespraak’ van deze belastinguitvreter die zich koning Felipe VI laat noemen…… Allemachtig wat een hufter!!

Vergeet niet dat de fascistische massamoordenaar, beul en verkrachter Franco heeft gezorgd voor een herintreding van het Spaanse koningshuis…… Dat dit koningshuis daarmee akkoord ging was al een teken aan de wand……..

*   Zie: ‘Catalonië en Puigdemont gefeliciteerd met de dikke overwinning van de onafhankelijkheid coalitie!


** Zie: Spaanse koning Felipe VI waant zich met commentaar op Catalaanse onafhankelijkheidsstreven in lang vervlogen tijden……

Zie ook: ‘Puigdemont mag volgens de Duitse rechter worden uitgeleverd aan Spanje…… Alweer een zwarte dag voor de EU….


       en:  ‘Catalonië onafhankelijk: waarom hoor je EU landen (en de EU zelf) niet over de zware inperking van de democratie in Spanje?


        en: ‘Puigdemont de gevluchte Catalaanse politicus is gearresteerd door de Duitse politie…….


       en: ‘Catalaanse onafhankelijkheid door een andere bril dan die van de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

        en: ‘Spain’s Suppression of the Catalonia Independence Movement Is Backfiring

        en: ‘Spanje bewijst het gelijk van Catalonië’s wens voor onafhankelijkheid……

        en: ‘Spanje denkt met fascistisch geweld de roep om onafhankelijkheid van Catalonië de kop in te kunnen drukken…….


        en:  ‘Timmermans (PvdA EU) over Catalonië: proportioneel geweld is soms gerechtvaardigd…….. AUW!!!

        en: ‘Timmermans (PvdA EU): “There can be no human rights without the rule of law….”

        en: ‘Bankenmaffia chanteert het Catalaanse volk……..

        en: ‘Rajoy neemt gas terug, maar verklaart in feite tegelijkertijd dat hij het Catalaanse parlement buiten werking zal stellen……….

       en: ‘Geert Mak over Catalonië: de Catalanen slaan aperte nonsens uit…….. Hoor wie het zegt… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘BBC World Service en hoogleraar Radboud met gekleurd ‘Catalaans commentaar…….’

       en: ‘Catalonië: Karel de Gucht >> de EU moet zich uitspreken tegen ondemocratisch Spaans geweld!

Rusland heeft niets van doen met manipulaties van de VS presidentsverkiezingen via Facebook, wel maakt Facebook meer kapot dan je lief is…….

Ex-topmensen van Facebook stellen dat dit medium onder meer een gevaar is voor de samenhang in de maatschappij op elk vlak en dat dit niets te maken heeft met Russische manipulaties…… Oké, niets nieuws onder de zon, maar gezien de volhardendheid van de reguliere westerse (massa-) media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici, in de leugen dat Rusland de VS verkiezingen en verkiezingen elders zou hebben gemanipuleerd, is het belangrijk elk bewijs tegen deze kul te noemen, kul die niet anders gezien kan worden dan als anti-Russische propaganda……..

Eén van de ex-topmensen van Facebook, Chamath Palihapitiya, stelde zelfs dat zijn kinderen niet op Facebook mogen……

De hysterie over Russische bemoeienis kent geen grenzen meer en zelfs de wil tot onafhankelijkheid van het Catalaanse volk en de Brexit worden Rusland in de schoenen geschoven. Rusland zou met name ‘sociale media’ als Facebook en Twitter gebruiken om het volk elders te manipuleren…… Waar Rusland bijvoorbeeld voor de VS verkiezingen ‘het enorme bedrag’ van 100.000 dollar zou hebben geïnvesteerd in reclames op Facebook voor wodka* enz……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Als je het totale bedrag ziet dat werd gebruikt voor de campagne t.b.v. de VS presidentsverkiezingen, is die 100.000 dollar een schijntje ‘dat nog niet een deuk in een pak boter kan slaan…..’

Dat bedrag voor die ‘Russische advertenties’, advertenties die de mensen bepaald niet opriepen tot revolutie, is het ‘enige bewijs’ dat aan Rusland (en niet aan de Russische regering) is te linken, hoe hard men ook schreeuwt dat er bergen bewijzen liggen, getoond worden ze niet!! ‘Vreemd genoeg’ is wel het tegendeel te bewijzen, dus VS manipulaties van een groot aantal zaken in landen waar de VS niets te zoeken heeft….. Sterker nog: de VS heeft via Wikileaks getoond dat het een enorm aantal ‘instrumenten’ heeft, waarmee men de schuld voor VS manipulaties in de schoenen kan schuiven van een andere regering….**

Hetzelfde wat betreft die ‘Russische advertenties’ geldt overigens voor Groot-Brittannië, waar voor het EU referendum (Brexit) een bedrag van minder dan 1 pond, zou zijn gebruikt voor die advertenties, aldus de fascist Farage. Het echte bedrag zal wel ‘iets hoger’ zijn geweest, maar deze overdrijving is wel degelijk gepast als je ziet hoeveel geld men in de campagne voor/tegen de Brexit heeft gestoken…….

Mensen lees het volgende artikel dat, oh gruwel, van RT komt en dat ik tegenkwam op het blog van Stan van Houcke. RT zou ook bezig zijn met het manipuleren van westerse bevolkingen, ook al kan men daar niet 1 bewijs voor aanvoeren…… Zie wat het echte gevaar van Facebook is en de manipulaties van westerse bedrijven, media en (de meeste westerse) politici, door misbruik te maken van o.a. Facebook:

Ex-Facebook
chiefs deplore its ‘social destruction’ – and it’s got
nothing to do with Russia!

Ex-Facebook chiefs deplore its ‘social destruction’ – and it’s got nothing to do with Russia!

© Jaap Arriens / Reuters 

Finian
Cunningham Published time: 13 Dec, 2017 15:55

Former
executives at Facebook are now coming out to condemn how the social
media giant is “destroying society and civil discourse” and
spreading “misinformation.” Moreover, they say, it’s got
nothing to do with Russia.

One
of the former Facebook gurus is Chamath Palihapitiya who 
told a
business conference in the US that he doesn’t even let his own
children use the social media platform, so harmful is it, in his
view.

Those
admissions should be seen as a welcome rational perspective to
counter the hysterical Western mainstream media discourse propagated
over the past year, which seeks to blame Russia for interfering in
elections and sowing discord in society – largely, it is claimed,
through manipulation of social media like Facebook.

Nigel Farage

@Nigel_Farage

Where is the screaming conspiracy theory about Russia and the EU referendum, now we we know they spent less than £1 on Facebook? http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2017/12/13/facebook-russians-spent-just-73-pence-ads-brexit-campaign/ 


Facebook: Russians spent just 73p on adverts during Brexit campaign

Facebook has said Russian operatives spent just 97 cents (73p) on adverts targeted at British people during last year’s Brexit vote.

telegraph.co.uk

Before
getting to the admissions from the former Facebook executives, let’s
recap on the pandemic delirium of alleged Russian influence.

US
Congressional committees – at huge taxpayer expense – haul social
media executives to face McCarthyite interrogations into “
Russian
interference
”;
British Prime Minister Theresa May accuses Russia of “
sowing
division

in Western societies; NATO and aligned think tanks, and media accuse
the Kremlin of destabilizing elections with “fake news” sluiced
through social media.


Over
the past year, it has become almost an article of faith among Western
governments, media and think tanks that Russian state agents used
Facebook and other social media to wage cyberwar. “
Russia
is at war with us,

say hawkish senators like John McCain.

The
biggest victory for the Russians, we are told, was the election of
Donald Trump to the White House.

Incredibly,
the Kremlin is accused of manipulating Facebook, Twitter, YouTube,
and so on, by placing adverts and posts to orchestrate public opinion
across entire Western societies. Never mind that the evidence for
this alleged nefarious scheme is tenuous at best, and never mind that
the money spent on ads supposedly placed by Russians is paltry
compared with the total revenues earned by social media companies.

Read more

© Jaap Arriens / Global Look Press

Google’s
de-ranking of RT in search results is a form of censorship 

and
blatant propaganda

The
dearth of rational perspective in this narrative of “
Russian
meddling

is largely driven by Cold War-style stereotypical Russophobia. The
notion that Russian agents or “
Kremlin-sponsored
news media

could sway voters and societies completely misses the forest for the
trees. That is that Facebook and other mainly US-based social media
have already a preponderant influence on billions of people around
the world.

The
impact of such social media on societies and personal relations
is profound and inestimably huge. Yet, there is hardly a
proportionate debate on this insidious influence. The alleged
interference or manipulation by Russiam agents – a charge which the
Russian government has categorically rejected – is transformed into
a frenzied debate, when in reality the actual infringement is
negligible.

Contrast
that with the relative silence over the more plausible deleterious
impact of Facebook and other Western social media.

Chamath
Palihapitiya, a former vice president for user growth at Facebook who
left the company in 2011, 
told the
business conference that he felt “
tremendous
guilt

over his role in building the social media platform to its global
reach of two billion users.

Scathing
of the negative influence he believes now that Facebook is having on
society, communities, families, and individuals, he said bluntly: “
I
don’t use that sh*t.

Nor,
he says, does he allow his own children to join Facebook.

Why?
Because, according to Palihapitiya, Facebook is “
ripping
the social fabric apart and how society works.

The
former executive told the Stanford Business School event in the US:
This
is not about Russian ads. This is a global problem. It is eroding the
core foundations of how people behave by and between each other.

Did
you hear that? “
This
is not about Russian ads.

If
that’s not damning enough, the founding president of Facebook, Sean
Parker, has also recently come out to 
condemn
the
harmful impact of social media on society and on personal
interactions.

God
knows what it is doing to our children’s brains,

he said.

Parker,
who is no longer with the company, said the social platform was
deliberately designed to exploit people, to turn users into addicts
to consume their time and thoughts. He referred to the “
Like
button as a device to induce “
dopamine
hits

– the natural happy hormone in humans.

This
profit-making abuse is something which he is not proud of now.
Indeed, the former president says he is using his wealth to help
discover cancer treatments.

Parker,
who made over $2 billion from developing Facebook, along with the
current CEO Mark Zuckerberg, said the social media platform was aimed
consciously at “
exploiting
human vulnerability through social-validation feedback loops
.”

The
pervasive influence of Facebook and other social media raises
troubling questions about the future of society, and social
communications and cohesion.

Read more

© Jaap Arriens / Global Look Press

Tell
us what’s true or democracy will die: German spy chief’s 

ultimatum to US tech giants

Sure,
it can be said the growth of global communications has got to be a
good thing in terms of fostering awareness, solidarity, and action
for change on a worldwide basis.

On
the downside though, the reverse is also true. Facebook and the like
can absorb billions of people into an artificial, atomized existence
where individuals end up being disempowered and feeling deeply
dissatisfied with their lives.

Contrary
to what advocates say, the scope for human interaction and social
change can become diminished to the point of atrophy and apathy.

Add
to this the enormous potential of Facebook being used to disseminate
information (propaganda) that promotes the US and other Western
governments’ political agendas.

Facebook,
Twitter and Google are openly engaging in censorship of alternative
media sources which have been fingered as “
fake
or “
illegitimate.”
Fingered that is, by Western governments. Russian news media have
borne the brunt of this campaign to discredit and censor.

However,
the influence of US-based social media giants goes way beyond the
control of information that users of these networks are allowed to
access.

The
bigger picture is the harmful impact that these communication media
are having on the very fabric of society, on social relations, and
the way human beings associate and organize. And in particular, the
way humans organize to create political and social change.

Karl
Marx once sardonically deprecated organized religion as the “
opium
of the people
.”

Today,
the opium can be said to be Facebook and its ilk of paralyzing social
media. Just ask the founders.

Finian
Cunningham (born 1963) has written extensively on international
affairs, with articles published in several languages. Originally
from Belfast, Northern Ireland, he is a Master’s graduate in
Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the
Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a
career in newspaper journalism. For over 20 years he worked as an
editor and writer in major news media organizations, including The
Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. Now a freelance
journalist
based in East Africa, his columns appear on RT, Sputnik, Strategic
Culture Foundation and Press TV.

https://www.rt.com/op-edge/412985-facebook-russia-misinformation-media/

========================================

*  Wel verdacht natuurlijk: bezopen mensen gaan niet stemmen!!

** Gisteren werd bekend gemaakt, dat ‘uiterst betrouwbare’ VS geheime diensten, Noord-Korea beschuldigen van WannaCry ‘virus’ lancering, NB gedaan met VS instrumenten zoals die werden weergegeven op de Vault 7 en 8 documenten op Wikileaks…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Dit ging weer geheel viraal en alle reguliere westerse media herhaalden dit als een kip zonder kop……. Zie wat dit betreft ook: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….‘ (ook de bewering dat Noord-Korea het WannaCry virus heeft verspreid, is naar grote waarschijnlijkheid een ‘false flag’ operatie van de CIA en/of de NSA, om zo Noord-Korea nog meer rijp te  maken voor een illegale inval door de VS……)

Zie ook: ‘Google, de volgende ‘die advertentieruimte verkocht aan Putin zelf……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media


       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en:  ‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

       en: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………