Het volgende artikel vond ik op de webpagina van Information Clearing House (ICH). Hierin het glasheldere commentaar van Finian Cunningham over de EU-Turkije vluchtelingen verkwanseling. Een akkoord waarin in feite het VN Vluchtelingenverdrag ter zijde werd geschoven. Binnenkort wordt, als het ‘even meezit’ de vluchteling helemaal vogelvrij verklaard…….. Aan de Hongaarse grens lopen al met scherp bewapende militairen……….
De kalief van Ankara, de reli-fascist Erdogan, lacht zich intussen een bult, de EU geeft hem meer dan een verdubbeling van de eerder door de wanpresterende PvdA kwal Timmermans toegezegde 3 miljard >> opgehoogd naar 6,6 miljard euro EU belastinggeld!! Dit terwijl Erdogan al minstens twee keer heeft bewezen, zich niet aan de gemaakte afspraken te houden en dan doel ik hier nog alleen op afspraken aangaande vluchtelingen…….. Voor een vertaling kan u onder het volgende artikel klikken, dit neemt wel wat tijd in beslag.
Smelling
EU Fear, Turkey Moves in for $6.6bn Kill
By
Finian Cunningham
March
08, 2016 “Information
Clearing House”
– “RT”
– When the Ankara government carried out a brutal media
crackdown at the weekend and then saw minimal Western protest as a
result, President Erdogan knew he had the upper-hand – to leverage
the refugee crisis.
It
seems more than strange that, only three days before a high-profile
summit was to take place between European Union leaders and Turkey on
Europe’s refugee crisis, the Ankara authorities carried out an
audacious assault on democratic rights.
The
violent police seizure of
Turkey’s biggest opposition newspaper, Zaman, and its immediate
cowing into a tame pro-government publication represents the most
brazen authoritarian move to date by the ruling AK party of President
Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
Turkish
opposition politicians denounced the
full-frontal assault on independent media as tantamount to a coup
d’état by Erdogan.
But
the Western response to the draconian display of state power was more
muted than ever. There was hardly any Western media coverage of the
Zaman seizure. Both Washington and the EU merely issued perfunctory
statements of “concern,” and
breathlessly urged Ankara to respect “free
speech” and “core
European values.”
In
recent months, Erdogan has been locking
up journalists and closing critical media outlets. Under his
increasingly autocratic rule, the Ankara authorities have prosecuted
thousands of citizens who have “insulted” the
president through social media.
More
gravely, Erdogan has ordered a bloody wave of repression against
ethnic Kurds in the country’s southeast, with disturbing reports of
mass killings by Turkish troops. Turkish military have also been
shelling across the border at Kurdish positions in Syria for several
weeks now.
It
is not as if EU leaders are oblivious to Erdogan’s rogue conduct.
An EU report issued
in November highlighted the growing repression of human rights. But
still Erdogan continued his autocratic power-grab anyway. And the
full-scale assault on an opposition news media outlet at the weekend
is arguably his most flagrant move yet. The timing suggests it was a
gambit to test EU resolve.
In
other words, Erdogan knew from the Western silence and empty
platitudes that there would be no repercussions for his repressive
gambit. And why was that? Because, as Erdogan is all too aware, the
EU is on its knees to gain his cooperation on ending the refugee
crisis assailing its very foundations. That, in turn, meant that he
could send his prime minister, Ahmet Davutoglu, to Brussels to
extract whopping concessions.
Significantly,
at the last minute before the Brussels summit opened on Monday,
Turkey’s premier Davutoglu pulled
out “some
new ideas.” One
of those “new
ideas” was
that Ankara was no longer requesting $3.3 billion in EU aid, as it
had done four months previously. Ankara was now demanding double the
money.
Davutoglu hinted
at the upper-hand when he arrived in Brussels, saying: “The
whole future of Europe is on the table.” And
he also let it be known that Turkey was talking more than just
refugees, adding that
Ankara expected “a
new era in Turkey-EU relations.”
The
upshot of negotiations in Brussels this week is that Turkey is to
receive a 100 percent increase in promised financial aid from the
European Union – to $6.6 billion – supposedly for accommodating
Syrian refugees on its territory.
Ankara
also wrung a promise from Euroland that its 75 million citizens could
avail of visa-free travel by as early as June this year; and, perhaps
the biggest prize of all, Turkey got a commitment from Brussels to
speed up its long-delayed accession to the European Union.
A
Financial Times report hinted
at the delicate balancing act: “EU
leaders tread carefully over Turkey’s media
crackdown,” adding: “Leaders
careful not to jeopardize deal with Ankara on migration.”
In
theory, the EU has been spared the nightmare scenario of thousands of
refugees crossing on a daily basis from Turkey into Greece and thence
further north. The uncontrolled migration over the past year was
threatening the very existence of the 28-nation EU, with member
states publicly bickering over closed borders and perceived unfair
burdens.
What
Ankara appears to be giving in exchange is its cooperation in
the systematic return of all refugees presently in Greece – some
30,000 – back to Turkey. At some unspecified future date, the EU is
committed to take back Syrian refugees in equal numbers in a
seemingly orderly process of asylum application. However, it remains
to be seen if such a complex arrangement of refugees being brought
back to the EU can work in practice. For one thing, the EU will still
have huge problems among its member states refusing to take up quotas
of asylum seekers.
Nevertheless,
what may be deemed certain is the forcible “shipping
back” –
as European Council President Donald Tusk put it – of refugees from
Greece to Turkey. “The
days of irregular migration to Europe are over,”said Tusk
with a tone of relief following the Brussels summit.
In
that grim task of hauling back beleaguered families, the NATO
military alliance is to take the
lead. NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg confirmed that the
alliance was increasing its naval presence in the Aegean Sea to
intercept refugee boats.
The
deal thus smacks of an emergency measure where supposed lofty EU
principles are being thrown overboard.
EU
leaders were increasingly desperate to halt the flow of migrants and
this is the outcome. German Chancellor Angela Merkel was under
particular pressure to stem the human tide following her
erstwhile “open
door” policy.
The
refugee pathway into Europe has thus been blockaded with this latest
EU-Turkish deal, even though there are serious ethical and legal
implications over such a drastic measure. Under EU law, all refugees
have the right to seek asylum. That is no longer guaranteed, but what
is guaranteed is that any refugee boat intercepted in the Aegean will
be forced back to Turkey by NATO warships. That is a signal
escalation of raw power over humanitarian rights.
The
irony of all this is bitter. Only last week, NATO leaders
were accusing Russia
of“weaponizing
Syrian refugees” for
alleged political objectives to do with undermining the European
Union. That preposterous contention is not worth dignifying with
closer examination.
Much
closer to reality though is that NATO member Turkey is the party that
has weaponized refugees. Erdogan’s state has played a prominent
role in inciting the five-year war in Syria for regime change in
Damascus. The war is in danger of dragging on even further given
Turkey’s ongoing role in illegally supplying weapons
and insurgents into Syria. That is the background to why nearly three
million Syrian refugees have ended up in Turkey and for why Europe
has incurred the destabilizing influx of migrants.
As
Syrian President Bashar Assad said recently,
Europe’s refugee crisis would be quickly solved if the covert war
on his country was stopped. That is achievable if European powers
clamped down on Turkey and Saudi Arabia sending weapons and
mercenaries into Syria.
But
instead, the EU overlords award the Erdogan regime with $6.6 billion
while at the same time brutalizing human rights; and thereby ensuring
that the whole problem is postponed for a much bigger eventuality.
Finian
Cunningham (born 1963) has written extensively on international
affairs, with articles published in several languages. Originally
from Belfast, Northern Ireland, he is a Master’s graduate in
Agricultural Chemistry and worked as a scientific editor for the
Royal Society of Chemistry, Cambridge, England, before pursuing a
career in newspaper journalism. For over 20 years he worked as an
editor and writer in major news media organizations, including The
Mirror, Irish Times and Independent. Now a freelance journalist based
in East Africa, his columns appear on RT, Sputnik, Strategic Culture
Foundation and Press TV.
Click
for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French,
translation- Note- Translation
may take a moment to load.
Zie ook: ‘Azmani de gecamoufleerde gesel van de vluchtelingen……..‘
Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.
