Trump stuurt 800 militairen naar de Mexicaanse grens met de VS om arme vluchtende drommels tegen te houden……

Afgelopen
nacht in het BBC World Service radionieuws van 1.00 u. (CET) aandacht voor Trump die sprak over de karavaan met intussen duizenden
mensen die vanuit Latijns-Amerika op weg zijn naar de VS. Volgens Trump
brengen deze mensen de staatsveiligheid van de VS in gevaar…… ha!
ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Vandaar
ook dat Trump nog eens 800 militairen extra naar die grens stuurt,
gezien zijn woorden is het niet ondenkbaar dat deze militairen straks
zullen schieten op arme, ongewapende mensen, ook al ontkent bijvoorbeeld CNN dat dit zal gebeuren…..

© EPA

Intussen dreigt Trump landen als Honduras Guatemala en El Salvador met het inhouden van hulp, daar zij niets hebben ondernomen tegen deze onafzienbare karavaan met wanhopige mensen… Van Mexico eist Trump dat dit land de karavaan stopt, echter zelfs zijn eigen administratie ziet dondersgoed dat een dergelijke stroom mensen niet anders te stoppen is dan met grof geweld…..

De
mensen in die karavaan zijn op de vlucht voor de uitzichtloze armoede en voor geweld, beiden zaken waar de VS een wel heel dikke
vinger in de pap heeft, al was het alleen al vanwege de enorme
wapenexport van de VS naar Latijns-Amerikaanse landen, wapens die ook grootschalig worden gebruikt door de georganiseerde misdaad……

Hoe dik de VS vinger is, blijkt wel uit het volgende: de karavaan bestaat voor het grootste deel uit Hondurese burgers, daar voor de grote onderlaag van dat land de ellende totaal ondragelijk is geworden, dit is te danken aan de junta, die na een door de VS georganiseerde staatsgreep werd geparachuteerd door NB diezelfde VS……..

© EPA

De VS oorlog tegen drugs treft vooral de gewone Latijns-Amerikaanse
bevolkingen en zoals al zo vaak aangetoond: de VS stimuleert in feite
alleen de productie van drugs in dat deel van de wereld, niet alleen
door die zinloze VS oorlog, maar ook door diensten als de DEA en CIA, die
profiteren van de drugssmokkel en de verkoop van die drugs in de VS…….. 
(o.a. om uiterst illegale acties te bekostigen) Voorts worden hele arealen aan landbouwgrond onbebouwbaar gemaakt in Latijns-Amerika, dit door het sproeien van gif, zodat daar geen zaken als coca of marihuana kunnen worden bebouwd, zoals je begrijpt wordt dit veelal door de VS gedaan……

Trump heeft beloofd deze karavaan te stoppen, letterlijk zei hij: “They will be stopped” en zoals eerder gezegd, te vrezen valt dat dit met grof geweld zal gebeuren, daar deze vluchtelingen niet van zins zijn zich te laten tegenhouden, niet door gebieden die gevaarlijk zijn door bendes, niet door rivieren en niet door Trump!

© EPA

Het is
als met de illegale oorlogen van de VS in het Midden-Oosten: de bevolkingen van landen als Irak, Syrië en Afghanistan (waar de laatste eigenlijk buiten het Midden-Oosten ligt) worden getroffen en een groot deel van hen
probeert te vluchten naar de EU, dezelfde EU die de oorlogen van de
VS steunt, zowel politiek al militair….. Hoewel verantwoordelijk
voor de oorzaak van het vluchten door een enorm aantal mensen, weigeren de VS en de EU deze vluchtelingen op te
nemen…….. (en vergeet niet dat deze vluchtelingenstromen op gang kwamen met behulp van o.a. ons belastinggeld!)

Ongelofelijk
en onverdraaglijk!!!

Vanmorgen vond ik op Anti-Media het volgende artikel, geschreven door Emma Platoff, eerder gepubliceerd op de The Texas Tribune

Trump
Administration to Send at Least 800 Troops to the US-Mexico Border

National Guard troops leave Austin for the U.S.-Mexico border on April 6, 2018.

Photo credit: Callie Richmond

October 25, 2018 at 11:11 am

Written
by 
Texas
Tribune

President
Donald Trump has raised alarm about a caravan of migrants heading for
the border. He tweeted Thursday morning that he is “bringing out
the military for this National Emergency.”

(TT) — The
Trump administration is expected to send 800 or more troops to the
U.S.-Mexico border to support border enforcement already stationed
there at a time the president has called a “national emergency.”

According
to 
multiple reports,
Defense Secretary James Mattis could sign an order to that effect as
early as Thursday. The troops — who are expected to be in place by
next week — would be directed to help border authorities stop a
caravan of thousands of Central American migrants who are making
their way through Mexico toward the United States, 
according
to CNN
.

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Brandon Judd of the National Border Patrol Council is right when he says on @foxandfriends that the Democrat inspired laws make it tough for us to stop people at the Border. MUST BE CHANDED, but I am bringing out the military for this National Emergency. They will be stopped!

With
the midterm elections approaching, Republicans across the country
have been raising alarm about the threat posed by those migrants. At
rally
in Houston
 on
Monday, Trump suggested the migrants may be funded by Democrats, and
claimed that some of the migrants are Middle Eastern. There is no
evidence for either claim.

And
earlier this week, U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, 
said it
may be necessary to staff up the border.

I
think this caravan is a serious threat,” Cruz told reporters in
Houston on Monday. “When you see thousands of people pledging to
come violate U.S. law, to cross into this country illegally, we have
to treat that seriously.”

We
have to stop it,” Cruz added, “whether that means putting Border
Patrol at the border to stop them or whether that means calling up
the National Guard.”

The
delegation is expected to include some active-duty forces, primarily
from the

Army, according
to the Washington Post
.
CNN 
reported that
the troops would not engage in “lethal operations” to stop the
migrants, but would reinforce fencing at spots where migrants might
cross, and also provide tents and medical care for border
authorities. It was not immediately clear Thursday morning where
along the border the reinforcements would be stationed.

The
president also directed 
troops to
the border in April in an effort to deter illegal immigration. The
tide of border crossings has persisted under Trump, and the number of
families crossing 
surged in
September to record levels.

Former
Texas Gov. Rick Perry deployed National Guard troops to the border in
summer 2014, and Gov. Greg Abbott 
kept
them in place
 after
taking office.

Gov.
Greg Abbott’s office did not immediately return a request for
comment.

By Emma
Platoff
 / Republished
with permission / 
Texas
Tribune

============================

Zie ook:

VS gebruikt chemische wapens tegen ongewapende vluchtelingen waaronder kinderen

BBC volkomen krom over de vluchtelingen uit Honduras die wel degelijk door Trump met geweld worden bedreigd

Trump letterlijk: “Barbwire used in the right way can be a beautiful sight” Trump op een verkiezingsbijeenkomst over het ‘probleem van de vluchtelingenkaravaan’ uit de door de VS gecreëerde ellende in Honduras

VS stuurt 5.000 militairen extra naar de grens met Mexico, als wapen tegen de karavaan met armen uit Latijns-Amerika

Door VS gesteunde bewind in Honduras heeft de staat van beleg afgekondigd……..

VS heeft Hondurese speciale eenheden getraind die protesten tegen een waterkrachtcentrale gewelddadig hebben neergeslagen……

Hillary Clinton mede verantwoordelijk voor moord op Berta Cáceres………..

Hondurese activiste ontvoerd en vermoord (alweer…), met instemming van de VS………

Berta Cáceres voorvechter gelijke rechten en milieuactivist vermoord in Honduras

Chinese marine troeft VS af in Zuid-Chinese Zee

De VS
rekent de Zuid-Chinese Zee tot haar territoriale wateren, althans
anders kan je niet concluderen als je ziet dat de VS China keer op
keer uitdaagt in een gebied dat China ‘iets meer gerechtigd dan de
VS’, ziet als haar territoriale wateren…….

Eindelijk
heeft China besloten dat het genoeg is geweest en heeft de torpedobootjager
USS Decator, een schip met geleide raketten aan boord, weggejaagd uit haar territoriale wateren!

China
wordt door de westerse wereld beschuldigd van ‘expansiedrift’, door
het opspuiten van eilandjes in de Zuid-Chinese Zee. Echter gezien het
grote aantal militaire bases van terreurentiteit VS rond een deel van
haar grondgebied, kan je niet anders dan China gelijk geven, immers de
VS heeft ruim voldoende bewezen totaal onbetrouwbaar te zijn en
uiterst agressief te opereren en dat in een fiks deel van de
wereld…… 

Trouwens over expansiedrift gesproken, als er voor die claim één land in aanmerking komt is het wel de VS, met haar meer dan 800 militaire bases over de wereld en dat voor een ‘land’ dat zoals gezegd ten overvloede heeft bewezen uiterst agressief te werk te gaan, neem alleen al: 

  • alle illegale oorlogen die het is begonnen. 
  • het organiseren van staatsgrepen in vele landen, veelal voorafgegaan door door de VS georganiseerde opstanden, zoals in Libië, Oekraïne en Syrië (waarin de CIA in beide gevallen, dus zowel opstand als coup, een grote rol speelde). 
  • het uitvoeren van geheime militaire operaties. 
  • het hacken zelfs van bevriende regeringen (zoals de telefoon van de Duitse premier Merkel).
  • het manipuleren van de bevolking via diverse media in binnenland en in vele buitenlanden*
  • het voeren van de oorlog tegen drugs**
  • het vermoorden van verdachten middels drones, waarbij godbetert meer dan 90% van de slachtoffers niet eens werd verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen…….

Vanaf het einde van WOII heeft de VS ruim meer dan 22 miljoen mensen vermoord……***

Gelukkig
dat China en Rusland intussen schoon genoeg hebben van de VS terreur
en niet meer terugdeinzen om de spierballen te laten zien (zo heeft Rusland de door de VS en NAVO lidstaten gevreesde S-300 raketten geleverd aan Syrië, dit tegen de agressie van Israël, de VS en een paar hielenlikkende NAVO partners. Het is de
hoogste tijd dat de VS zich volledig terugtrekt op eigen (gestolen)
bodem en daar blijft, ofwel: Yankee go home (and stay there)!!

Chinese
Warship Intercepts US Guided-Missile Destroyer in South China Sea

October
1, 2018 at 10:19 pm

Written
by 
Jason
Ditz

(ANTIWAR.COM— US
naval operations in the South China Sea are built primarily around
needling China. China has built up a number of islands and claims
ownership of them. The US insists China doesn’t own them, and also
that they’re not really islands, so the USS Decatur, a
guided-missile destroyer, was sent to sail past one of the islands,
as a way to thumbing their nose at Chinese claims.

That
doesn’t work for China, who sent one of their own destroyers to
intercept the American ship, which was just 12 nautical miles off the
Spratly Islands. China called the US ship’s presence a “threat”
and said the Chinese ship was sent there to tell them to leave.

US
officials are now 
furious as
well, both because they intend to keep sailing past those islands to
spite China, and 
because
they say China’s ship was “unsafe” in getting so close to them
,
forcing the USS Decatur to move to prevent a collision.

US
officials tend to over-emphasize the “unsafe” operations of
anyone confronting US warships, especially pushed when tensions are
mounting, as the US-China tensions have been in recent weeks.

Two
destroyers 45 yards from one another is close, but not unnavigable.
China’s ship forced the US ship to turn, which was the whole point
of the interception, to chase the USS Decatur out of what China
considers their territorial waters.

Generally,
a ship passing 12 miles from a small island would barely be noticed,
and China has previously ignored such operations. The Pentagon,
however, have emphasized that they are explicitly flouting Chinese
territorial claims with such sail-bys, and China apparently felt
obliged to respond.

By Jason
Ditz
 /
Republished with permission / 
ANTIWAR.COM / Report
a typo

========================================

*    Zie:

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

‘VS ‘ministerie van propaganda’ had supervisie over meer dan 800 films en minstens duizend tv series……..

Iran: moderne oorlogspropaganda ingezet door VS tegen ‘ongehoorzaam land…

VS en GB brengen propaganda die moet verdoezelen wat er echt gebeurt in Syrië…….. Door VS gebombardeerde ‘gifgasfabriek’ niet bestaand….

**  Deze ‘oorlog tegen drugs’ (o.a. gevoerd door de DEA middels de import in de VS van enorme hoeveelheden drugs) heeft aan een groot aantal mensen het leven gekost…… Zie ook: De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

*** Zie:

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

Oliver North, ex-CIA, oud-drugslord en oorlogsmisdadiger waarschijnlijk nieuwe president terreurorganisatie NRA……

Lees het volgende uitstekende artikel van Jon Schwarz, gepubliceerd op The Intercept, over Oliver North die van drugslord, nu waarschijnlijk snel zal
worden gebombardeerd (deden ze dat maar letterlijk) tot president van
terreurorganisatie NRA, ofwel de National Rifle Association……

Leden van de NRA snappen nog steeds
niet dat alcohol één van de dodelijkste harddrugs op de wereld is,
maar hebben wel de pest aan alles wat men verder illegale drugs* noemt
(waar ze uiteraard ook cannabis toe rekenen……). Geen nood voor deze veelal hypocriete christenen, Oliver North wordt ondanks zijn rol als ‘drugslord’ en terrorist gewoon als held gezien, terwijl hij een oorlogsmisdadiger is die berecht zou moeten worden voor het Internationaal Strafhof in Den Haag (het ICC)…..

Als North bijvoorbeeld een Colombiaan was geweest, had men hem al lang opgesloten in de VS vanwege zijn bemoeienis met de invoer van enorme hoeveelheden cocaïne (in de VS)…..

Voorts heeft North de Contra’s in Nicaragua, een terreurgroep die tegen de socialistische regering vocht, gesteund met wapens, die hij kocht van de winsten gemaakt met drugshandel….

Ach het voorgaande geeft ten overvloede nog eens aan waarvoor de NRA staat: grootschalige terreur op de straten, scholen en andere openbare gelegenheden van de VS…….

OLIVER
NORTH WORKED WITH COCAINE TRAFFICKERS TO ARM TERRORISTS. NOW HE’LL
BE PRESIDENT OF THE NRA.

     Jon
Schwarz

  May
12 2018, 2:03 p.m.

Former U.S. Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North gives the Invocation at the National Rifle Association-Institute for Legislative Action Leadership Forum in Dallas, Friday, May 4, 2018. (AP Photo/Sue Ogrocki)

THE
NATIONAL RIFLE ASSOCIATION
 has always been
clear about drugs: They’re terrifying.

Last
year, NRA CEO Wayne LaPierre 
darkly
warned
 that
members of drug gangs “are infiltrating law enforcement and even
the military.” In 2013, LaPierre 
proclaimed that
“Latin American drug gangs have invaded every city of significant
size in the United States,” and are a key part of the “hellish
world” that awaits us in the future. When Charlton Heston was
president of the NRA in the 1990s, he 
declared that
regular Americans would soon be besieged by 10,000 drug dealers freed
from prison by the Clinton administration.


It
seems odd, then, that the next president of the NRA 
will
soon be Oliver North
,
who spent years in the 1980s working together with large-scale
cocaine traffickers and protecting a notorious narco-terrorist
from the rest of the U.S. government.

This
reality about North has been largely covered up, first by North
himself and then by Fox News and the passage of time. Thirty
years later, it’s been almost totally forgotten. But the facts
remain genuinely appalling.

North
was an active-duty Marine when he joined the Reagan administration’s
National Security Council in 1981. One of Reagan’s top priorities
was organizing and funding the Contras, a guerrilla military force,
to overthrow the revolutionary socialist Sandinista government of
Nicaragua. But the Contras engaged in 
extensive,
gruesome terrorism
 against
Nicaraguan civilians. Congress gradually reduced and then eliminated
appropriations supporting them, leading the Reagan administration to
secretly search for money elsewhere.


According
to the report from a 
later
congressional investigation
,
North was put in charge of this operation, which participants dubbed
“The Enterprise.”

“Report
of the congressional committees investigating the Iran-Contra
Affair,” U.S. House of Representatives Select Committee to
Investigate Covert Arms Transactions with Iran; U.S. Senate Select
Committee on Secret Military Assistance to Iran and the Nicaraguan
Opposition, 1987

North
enthusiastically looked for cash wherever he could find it, and
led many of the clandestine schemes that later became known
as the Iran-Contra scandal. The Sultan of Brunei donated $10 million
(which North’s secretary Fawn Hall accidentally wired to the wrong
Swiss bank account), and Saudi Arabia ponied up as well. North also
pushed what he 
called “a
neat idea”: selling U.S. military equipment to Iran, with the
proceeds passed along to the Contras.

Meanwhile,
the Contras had a neat idea of their own: facilitating cocaine
trafficking through Central America into the U.S., with a cut going
toward supporting their war against the Sandinistas. Some Contras
were themselves cocaine traffickers, and others were simply happy to
make alliances of convenience with drug cartels.

There’s
no evidence North actively 
wanted cocaine
to be smuggled into the U.S. It was simply that he had other
priorities. But was he aware of the Contras’ drug trafficking? Yes.
Did he try to shield one of “his” cocaine traffickers from
consequences from the other branches of the U.S. government?
Yes. Did he work together with a known drug lord? Yes.

All
in all, North’s connections to drug trafficking were so egregious
that in 1989 he was 
banned
from entering Nicaragua’s neighbor Costa Rica
 by
Oscar Arias, the country’s president and 1987 recipient of the
Nobel Peace Prize.

This
may seem shocking to the easily shocked. But it’s all been
documented in various government investigations. All you need in
order to learn about it is curiosity and an internet connection. For
instance, here’s a screenshot from the 
CIA’s
website
 about
the Nicaraguan Revolutionary Democratic Alliance, or ADREN by
its Spanish acronym, which was later folded into the Contras:

“Allegations
of Connections Between CIA and The Contras in Cocaine Trafficking to
the United States,” CIA, 1998

The
full extent of North’s complicity in cocaine trafficking will never
be known. When the Iran-Contra scandal story broke in November 1986,
he ordered Hall to destroy so many documents that the 
shredder
malfunctioned
,
and she had to ask White House maintenance to come and fix it.
Moreover, when North was removed from his National Security Council (NSC) job, he took with him 2,848 pages of daily notes — which legally
belonged to the federal government. By the time a congressional
investigation was finally able to examine the notes, North and his
lawyers had redacted huge amounts of information.

Nonetheless,
543 of the pages mentioned drugs or drug trafficking, with the
probe 
finding that
“in many of these cases, material in the Notebooks adjacent to the
narcotics references has been deleted.”

“Drugs,
Law Enforcement And Foreign Policy,” U.S. Senate Committee on
Foreign Relations, 1989

But
despite North’s cover-up, what we do know for sure is
incredibly damning.

Perhaps
most significantly, according to North’s 
own
notes
 he
met with Panama’s then-dictator Manuel Noriega in London in
September 1986 to collaborate on a plan for Noriega to support the
Contras in return for American money and arms. They discussed
sabotaging a Nicaraguan airport and oil refinery, as well as creating
a program to train Contra and Afghan mujahedeen commandos in Panama
with Israeli help. (It’s not completely clear, but North appears to
have written that “Rabin” – i.e., Yitzhak Rabin, who was then
Israel’s minister of defense – “approves.”)

North
was clearly enthusiastic about the potential partnership with
Noriega. In 
an
earlier email
 selling
the proposal to one of his superiors, he wrote that “we might have
available a very effective, very secure means of doing some of the
things which must be done if the Nicaragua project is going to
succeed. … I believe we could make the appropriate arrangements w/
reasonable OPSEC and deniability.”

Email,
Oliver North to John Poindexter, May 8, 1986 (neem aan dat het niet om een email ging destijds….)

But
of course, Noriega was himself a powerful drug trafficker. Knowing
this didn’t require a top-secret clearance: It was published 
on
the front page
 of
the New York Times three months before North met with him.
According to the Times article, “A White House official said the
most significant drug-running in Panama was being directed by General
Noriega.”

The
North-Noriega operation ultimately didn’t come to fruition; the
Iran-Contra affair was exposed just two months after they met.
But the planning that did occur is conclusive evidence that North
eagerly worked with drug dealers operating on the largest scale
imaginable.

Panama
Strongman Said to Trade In Drugs, Arms and Illicit Money,” New York
Times, June 11, 1986

North
also went to 
great
lengths
 to
protect an ally who was a key participant in what the Justice
Department 
called “the
most significant case of narco-terrorism yet discovered.”

In
1984, José Bueso Rosa, a Honduran general, plotted with several
others to assassinate the president of Honduras. They planned to fund
the hit with the proceeds from selling 760 pounds of cocaine in the
U.S.

The
FBI, however, had the participants under surveillance, intercepted
the shipment when it arrived at a small airfield in Florida, and
arrested everyone involved.

But
Bueso had played a key role in Honduran support for the Contras. So
North went to work to get him off as lightly as possible. (Bueso had
not himself been charged with drug trafficking, but
wiretaps made it obvious he participated in that part
of the project.)

In
email, North 
explained his
plans to “cabal quietly” with other Reagan administration
officials “to look at options: pardon, clemency, deportation,
reduced sentence.” Eventually, North planned to have the case’s
judge informed “in camera” — that is, secretly — about “our
equities in this matter,” in order to push for leniency. Then,
North wrote, it would be necessary to quietly brief Bueso, so that he
wouldn’t “start singing songs nobody wants to hear.”

North
didn’t get everything he wanted, but did succeed in having Bueso
transferred to a “Club Fed” minimum security prison. Bueso was
released on parole after 40 months.

THERE
ARE ALSO
 numerous documented examples of North
being informed that members of the Contras were involved in drug
trafficking, with no signs that North took any action.

For
instance, after meeting with a key assistant, North 
wrote in
his notebooks about a plane being used by the brother of a top Contra
leader to ferry supplies from the U.S. to Central America. “Honduran
DC-6 which is being used for runs out of New Orleans,” North jotted
down, “is probably being used for drug runs into U.S.”

North
testified in front of Congress that he’d passed this information
along to the Drug Enforcement Administration. When later questioned
by the Washington Post, the DEA, the State Department, and the U.S.
Customs Service all 
stated that
there was no evidence North ever said anything about the matter to
them.

Oliver
North, notes, August 9, 1985

The
same aide who told North about the plane also 
informed
him
 about
the “potential involvement with drug running” of one Contra
official and that another was “now involved in drug running out of
Panama.” And after a call from another subordinate,
North 
noted that
the Contras were planning to buy weapons from a Honduran warehouse —
and “14 M to finance came from drugs.”

North
was getting similar reports from outside the government as well.
Dennis Ainsworth, a Republican real estate investor who’d
volunteered to help the Contra cause, informed a U.S. attorney that
the top Contra commander “was involved in drug trafficking,” but
that the Nicaraguan community was frightened to come forward
because “they could be blown away by Colombia hit squads.”
Ainsworth said he’d tried to inform the White House about this but
“we were put off by Ollie North,” and “I was even physically
threatened by one of Ollie North’s associates.” (The U.S.
attorney later wrote a 
memo with
Ainsworth’s statements and transmitted it to the FBI.)

Regarding
Dennis Madden Ainsworth, Information Concerning,” FBI, January 6,
1987

North
and the NRA did not immediately respond to requests for comment on
this history. When North ran for Senate in 1994, his
campaign spokesperson said his involvement with the Bueso case
was “old news and garbage and nobody cares about it.” In a 2004
appearance on Fox News, North called a congressional investigation
that focused on the Contra-cocaine connection “a witch hunt” with
witnesses “who clearly had a political agenda.”

But
the extraordinarily sordid nature of North’s past will be clear to
anyone who appraises it honestly. In announcing North’s
appointment, Wayne LaPierre said there’s “no one better
suited to serve as our President,” and he’s correct. Oscar
Arias 
wrote
Thursday
 that
the NRA “finds in Oliver North a leader worthy of its mission.”
Peter Kornbluh, who was co-director of the Iran-Contra documentation
project at the National Security Archive, is even more
straightforward: North, he says, is “the perfect pick to further
the NRA’s reputation for favoring bloodshed and criminality over
responsible gun control and ownership.”

Top
photo: Former U.S. Marine Lt. Col. Oliver North gives the Invocation
at the National Rifle Association-Institute for Legislative Action
Leadership Forum in Dallas on May 4, 2018.

Join
Our Newsletter

Original
reporting. Fearless journalism. Delivered to you.

I’m
in

==============================

* Let wel: in het Engels zijn drugs ook de medicijnen tegen ziekte enz. Het gebruik van opiaten als pijnbestrijder is één van de redenen waarom er nu zoveel ophef is in de VS over verslaafden aan die opiaten, ofwel synthetische opium zoals Oxycontin. Bij velen wordt de werking van deze opiaten in de loop van de jaren steeds zwakker, waarna ze hun toevlucht nemen tot echte, niet synthetische opiaten als heroïne…..

PS: in de kop staat dat North ex-CIA werknemer is, in feite was dit zo gezien zijn handelen met de CIA, echter officieel heeft hij nooit op de CIA loonlijst gestaan.

Puerto Rico, na de orkanen Irma en Maria in de steek gelaten door de VS, gaat energievoorziening verduurzamen

Puerto
Rico werd vorig jaar door 2 orkanen getroffen, Irma en Maria, deze hebben het eiland in diepe ellende gestort. Niet alleen gigantische materiële schade,
maar ook zaken als de elektriciteitsvoorziening werden vernield……
De Trump administratie heeft de situatie op Puerto Rico keer op keer
gebagatelliseerd en Trump gaf een hem bevriend bedrijf de opdracht om
de energievoorziening op het eiland weer op gang te brengen, echter
dit bedrijf had daar bij lange na de capaciteit niet voor…..

Er
zijn veel vergelijkingen met Sint Maarten, onderdeel van ‘ons
koninkrijk’, ook daar hield orkaan Irma stevig huis en 90% van de
huizen werd vernield*. Nederland misbruikte de enorme ellende voor de
bewoners om het bestuur van dit eiland te chanteren
(hoofdverantwoordelijke PvdA ploert Plasterk): het democratisch
gekozen bestuur moest opstappen en het kleine eiland met amper
middelen werd verplicht meer te doen aan grensbewaking, dit terwijl er al jaren een
peperdure marine missie gaande is rond de Antillen waar de
Nederlandse marine de VS marine assisteert in de zinloze jacht van de VS op
drugs uit Zuid-Amerika…….

Terug
naar Puerto Rico, waar men nu de blik heeft gevestigd op duurzame
energie, waarbij de firma van Elon Musk, Tesla de eilandbewoners helpt met batterijen
voor de opslag van zonne- en windenergie. Voor korte duur was Puerto Rico zelfs de VS staat, waarbij het grootste gebied werd voorzien van duurzame energie. 

Uiteraard is de Trump
administratie niet blij met het besluit van Puerto Rico om duurzaam
te gaan, immers deze administratie zet in op zoveel mogelijk fossiel
brandstofverbruik……. Toch leuk dat deze administratie dit zelf in de hand heeft gewerkt, al blijft het een godvergeten schandaal dat men deze elandbewoners zo lang heeft laten zitten, zoals het voor ons een schande
is, dat Nederland na 8 maanden eindelijk wat geld heeft overgemaakt voor
de wederopbouw van Sint Maarten, al wordt dit geld dan wel beheert door de neokoloniale
Wereldbank……. (het bestuur moest weg van Plasterk, daar het niet vertrouwd was geld aan dit bestuur over te maken, blijkbaar vertrouwt men nu ook het nieuwe bestuur niet……)

Lees
het volgende artikel van Harvey Wasserman over de gevolgen van 2
vernietigende orkanen op- en de verduurzaming van Puerto Rico:

Puerto
Rico Gets to Solartopia

Puerto
Rico Goes Back Door to Solartopia and the Corporate Media Blacks It
Out

By
Harvey Wasserman, Reader Supported News

Puerto
Rico has made history by becoming — briefly — the largest US
territory or state to be powered almost entirely by renewable energy.

The
corporate media has done all it can to black the story out.

The
rising grassroots movement to totally rebuild Puerto Rico’s
electric supply system with renewable energy and locally owned
micro-grids poses a serious threat to the centralized, fossil-based
corporate elite.

But
two hurricanes and two human-error blackouts have opened the door to
systemic change.

Here’s
how:


Last
September, Hurricane Irma blew through the Caribbean, passing over
enough of Puerto Rico to plunge tens of thousands of people into
darkness. Many of them are still without power.

Then
Hurricane Maria shredded the island’s electric grid and blacked out
its 3.4 million residents virtually in toto.

The
island had two large wind farms, one of which was severely damaged.
The other survived, but had no grid through which to distribute its
electricity.

Some
solar arrays on the island were also severely damaged.

But
at a farm in Barranquitas owned by Hector Santiago, 244 solar panels
kept some 2,500 light bulbs alight to maximize greenhouse plant
growth. Much to the derision of his neighbors, Santiago had invested
some $300,000 in the solar array. Small gas and kerosene-fired
generators kicked back up around the island. But Santiago’s solar
array may well have been its biggest operating power station. 

Over
the following months, the Puerto Rico Electric Power Authority (PREPA) tried
to restore its rickety poles and wires, plus its network of obsolete
gas and oil plants … and the ancient coal plant that burns ore from
Colombia.

Along
the way, PREPA’s director was fired, and Governor Ricardo Antonio
“Ricky” Rosselló Nevares has campaigned to privatize the
utility, a move strongly opposed by democracy activists.

On
April 8, as PREPA was bringing the island back up to near-total
power, restoration workers felled a tree onto live transmission
wires, knocking out power to some 850,000 customers.

Ten
days later, PREPA proudly announced that it had restored power to
95.8 percent of the island’s population. Some 62,000 customers were
still in the dark. But PREPA was proud that each the territory’s 78
municipalities had at least some power.

Literally
within hours, Puerto Rico was again plunged into darkness. The same
contractor that on April 8 had dropped a tree into the grid now ran
an excavator that shorted out the entire system. Once again, 

Puerto
Rico was without central-generated electric power.

But
now there was much more solar. In the wake of Irma and Maria,
Solartopian activists have poured thousands of photovoltaic panels
into the island. Strongly advocating that they become the centerpiece
of a rebuilt energy supply system, many collectors now power locally
owned micro-grids.

According
to Elon Musk, Tesla has helped make 662 locations energy
self-sufficient. Key has been San Juan’s Hospital del Nino, which
in just two weeks was made energy self-sufficient with panels and
batteries.

Nearly
all the island’s hospitals were knocked out by Maria. Dialysis
machines, operating rooms, air 

conditioning and other key services
went dead. Many still are.

Ironically,
according to activist Joel Segal, much of the nation’s supply of
pain-killing morphine and Dilaudid also went away, as they are mostly
(for tax purposes) manufactured in Puerto Rico.

While
referring uniformly to this latest centrally-generated fiasco as a
“total” blackout, the corporate media have almost totally ignored
this steady, fast-growing stream of power being generated on Puerto
Rico, virtually all of it solar.


CNN
did cover a local named “Frank,” who after Maria took his home
solar with $7500 in system components. Wired has reported on a
Brooklyn architect, Andrew Marvel (a grand-nephew of the famed
futurist Buckminster Fuller), who plans to use grants of $625,000 for
his 
Resilient
Power Puerto Rico
 to
build 25 small arrays with Tesla battery backups. Another 75 or more
may follow.


During
my 
California
Solartopia
 show
on KPFK-Pacifica in Los Angeles, a listener pledged $20,000 for

neighborhood micro-grid linked with solar panels and batteries.

Rep.
Ted Lieu (D-Calif.) and Rep. Stacey Plackett (D-Virgin Islands) have
asked FEMA to take the island solar. So has San Juan’s progressive
mayor, Carmen Yulin Cruz.

But
it’s all too hot for the corporate media.

In
December PREPA and the New York governor’s office estimated that
$17.6 billion was needed to revamp Puerto Rico’s old grid, funds
that could instead help take the island totally solar.

To
put that in perspective: Governor Andrew Cuomo wants New York
ratepayers to fork over $8 billion to keep four decrepit upstate
reactors on line, despite their owners’ attempts to close them.
Ohio’s 

FirstEnergy just asked Trump to force ratepayers to fork
over $8 billion PER YEAR in “emergency funding” to prop up four
more dying nukes and scores of obsolete coal burners.

Ironically,
the blacked-out story of Puerto Rico having already inadvertently
gone almost entirely solar has opened the brightest window onto a
sustainable future.

A
Solartopian Puerto Rico would enjoy permanent, reliable service, free
of fuel costs and protected from the ravages of the inevitable next
storm while avoiding the emissions that would help cause and
intensify it.

But
a Solartopian Puerto Rico would threaten the Trumpian corporatists
who want to “restore” the island’s central, fossil-fired,
utterly corrupted grid, which is sure to go down in the next
global-warmed hurricane. Or by the next felled tree and errant
excavator.

Puerto
Rico’s Solartopian moments are big news. So are the solar panels
and micro-grids that could help the island survive the next
hurricanes (season starts June 1) and corporate wrecking crews.

Let’s
keep those panels coming!


To
learn more contact me at 
solartopia.org.

Hear this
at prn.fm with
Joel Segal & David Braun:
 
http://prn.fm/solartopia-green-power-wellness-hour-04-19-18/

===============================

* Zie o.a.: ‘Sint Maarten bukt nog steeds onder de gevolgen van orkaan Irma, pas na bijna 8 maanden maakt Nederland wat geld over……..‘ Voor meer berichten over het schandalige gedrag van Nederland i.z. Sint Maarten, klik op het label met die naam, of op ‘orkaan Irma’, direct onder dit bericht.

Zie ook: 

Puerto Rico (‘VS’) wordt nog steeds slecht of niet geholpen voor gevolgen orkaan Maria >> Trump: ‘eiland krijgt teveel hulp’‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)


Trump: VS heeft een geweldige prestatie geleverd met de hulp aan Puerto Rico na orkaan Maria………. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

6.000 doden i.p.v. 60 op Puerto Rico na Orkaan Maria, zo gaat de VS met haar burgers om………

Puerto Rico het Sint Maarten van de VS: dodental orkaan Maria bijgesteld naar 2.975 en bijna een jaar later zit een groot deel van het eiland zonder stroom

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

De
war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan u zich realiseert, zo luidt de
kop boven een artikel van Brian Saady. Daar moet ik hem toch
corrigeren, die oorlog is veel dodelijker dan gedacht door het publiek dat hier
weinig of geen aandacht voor heeft, immers er wordt behoorlijk bericht over het enorme aantal doden dat
jaarlijks valt in Mexico en in andere Midden- en Zuid-Amerikaanse
landen, plus de VS….* Neem alleen al de massagraven die men in Mexico heeft ontdekt (en nog zal ontdekken…)…..


Voorts komt Saady met beschuldigingen als zou Hezbollah verantwoordelijk zijn voor drugssmokkel, een vaststelling die eerder al onderuit werd gehaald vanwege het ontbreken van enig bewijs……. Hetzelfde geldt voor zijn uitlating t.a.v. de Koerdische PKK……….

Jammer
ook dat Saady volkomen negatief spreekt over de FARC, terwijl deze
organisatie bijzonder veel heeft gedaan bijvoorbeeld t.b.v. de kleine
boeren en een groot aantal van hen heeft bescherming gekregen van de FARC tegen de willekeur
van het leger, de politie, de rechtse doodseskaders (die samen met
politie en leger) alles wat maar links rook, als het even kon (en nog
kan) vermoordde……. Waar de grootgrondbezitters en hun legertjes aan
‘beveiligers’ in Colombia ‘natuurlijk’ hun steentje aan bij hebben gedragen, sterker nog: de doodseskaders werden en worden gesteund door die grootgrondbezitters……

Je zou bijna denken dat vooral links verzet tegen willekeur de grote drugskartels vormen, echter dit is uiteraard grote flauwekul!

Lees
het artikel van Saady over deze zaak:

The
War on Drugs Is Far Deadlier Than You Realize

March
26, 2018 at 12:09 pm

Written
by 
Anti-Media
News Desk

(FEE— While
accepting the Nobel Peace Prize in 2016, Colombian President Juan
Manuel Santos 
said:

The
manner in which this war against drugs is being waged is equally or
perhaps even more harmful than all the wars the world is fighting
today, combined.”

The
death toll from the drug war is much less than the actual warfare
throughout the world. However, his sentiment is quite appropriate
because a significant percentage of the world’s violence could be
prevented with a flick of a pen by ending the War on Drugs.

Cartels
and Violence

Imagine
if we could essentially eliminate the black market for drug
trafficking in Chicago, which has the highest number of gang members
and homicides. It’s estimated that up to 
80
percent
 of
the city’s murders are gang-related. And one of the main causes of
this violence is connected to controlling turf for drug sales.

Gang
violence isn’t as rampant throughout the U.S., but the National
Gang Center estimated that 
13
percent
 of
the murders in the U.S. are gang-related. That falls in line with a
similar 
report by Narco
News
 that
concluded that 1,100 drug war-related murders occur each year in the
U.S. Keep in mind, that figure is fairly conservative due to the lack
of full transparency with crime statistics.

The
U.S. represents the largest market in the world for illegal drugs.
Currently, there is a well-documented opioid crisis but the U.S. also
consumes more 
cocainethan
all of Europe—and by a wide margin. All told, the U.S. illegal drug
black market represents a 
$100
billion
 annual
industry.

Although
there is a serious black market violence problem in the U.S., it
pales in comparison to the countries that are source and
transshipment points of illegal drugs. For example, there were over
29,000 murders in Mexico last year with roughly 
33–50
percent
 being
related to the drug war. That’s not factoring the 
30,000 missing
persons who are presumed to be dead.

The
cartels conduct warfare in a brazen manner that is essentially
indistinguishable from terrorist groups. Their conduct is so brutal,
they have been known to hang rival gang members from bridges or
publicly put bounties on corrupt government officials. Narco money
has enabled these organized crime groups to operate with impunity.

The
latest example of this corruption involves the leader of the Los
Rojos cartel 
financing the
campaigns of 11 mayoral candidates in exchange for political
protection. Bear in mind, this isn’t a matter of simple greed. If
these officials don’t take the bribes, they’ll likely be killed.
After all, over 
100
mayors
 have
been murdered in Mexico since 2006.

All
in all, narco money has corrupted every segment of the government
necessary to protect their organizations. (My 
free
e-book
America’s
Drug War is Devastating Mexico
,
gives much more detail of organized crime’s reign in Mexico.)

As
a matter of fact, Los Zetas have even corrupted the highest levels of
government in neighboring countries. The Ex-Vice President and former
Minister of Interior have each been arrested for allegedly accepting
bribes of 
$250,000 and $1.5
million
,
respectively.

The
Los Zetas cartel is responsible for the worst massacre in Guatemala
since the civil war. In 2011, cartel members 
beheaded 27
innocent farmworkers in search of a ranch owner who the cartel
suspected of stealing a drug shipment.

Due
largely to the War on Drugs, the four countries immediately south of
Mexico (Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, and El Salvador) are listed
within the top six highest murder rates in the world. Furthermore,
nine out of the 
top
ten
 are
in Latin America or the Caribbean.

Likewise,
43 of the 50 cities with the highest 
murder
rates
 are
in Latin America or the Caribbean. Four of the remaining cities are
in the continental U.S., i.e. Baltimore, Detroit, New Orleans, and
St. Louis. Only three cities are not in this hemisphere (South
Africa).

Obviously,
there are a variety of factors that contribute to violence, notably
extreme poverty. One city on the list (San Juan, Puerto Rico) has had
fairly 
low
crime
 in
recent years, but Hurricane Maria brought about much instability to
the island.

Otherwise,
it’s clear that the War on Drugs is one of the leading factors to
the high violence. Mexico had 12 cities in the top 50, which was the
second highest number behind Brazil.

It’s
important to note, Brazil isn’t a major source of drug production.
However, it has historically been the second largest consumer market
for cocaine and it is the leading 
transshipment point
of illegal drugs into Europe, Africa, and Asia. This is evident in
the fact that 17 Brazilian cities are in the top 50 global homicide
rates. Fourteen of those cities are located along the Atlantic Coast,
which is prime real estate for drug trafficking.

This
violence isn’t a result of a “soft on crime” approach; the
Brazilian government takes the term “War on Drugs” literally.
Like Mexico, the military, along with the police, conduct law
enforcement operations and the results are predictable. The Brazilian
police kill an average of 
six
people
each
day. Remarkably, the police are responsible for roughly one out of
five 
murders in
Rio de Janeiro, with few being held accountable.

The
police, in many cases, are acting in self-defense. However, the
Brazilian government has essentially provided the police with
impunity for extrajudicial murder and they operate in a brazen
manner. In this 
video, for
example, the police performed a drive-by shooting of two unarmed
teenagers.

It
should also be noted that several of the gangs conduct open warfare
against the police. The most gruesome example occurred in Sao Paulo
in May of 2006. Over the course of a week, more than 
150
people
 were
killed after Brazil’s most powerful gang, PCC, launched a wave of
attacks against multiple police stations. The police responded by
rounding up suspected gang members and executing them in kind.

Narco-Terrorism

As
you read more about the PCC and other criminal organizations, you are
likely to come across the term “narco-terrorism.” This term
was 
coined in
1982 by the President of Peru, Fernando Belaunde Terry.
Peru was and continues to be one of the top cocaine producers in the
world.

The
Peruvian communist terrorist group, Shining Path, has been largely
funded by “taxing” cocaine traffickers. Those profits have helped
them kill approximately 
11,000
civilians
.
Fortunately, the Shining Path’s membership numbers have drastically
dwindled and the organization is substantially less active.

Cocaine
money also played a major role in the 52-year Colombian civil war
that resulted in 220,000 deaths and over seven million domestic
refugees. Thankfully, the communist terrorist group, FARC, came
to a peace agreement in 2016. This group was responsible for numerous
bombings, kidnappings, and thousands of murders.

Most
of their members have agreed to lay down their arms. However, an
estimated 
1,200
dissidents
 have
refused to leave the criminal underworld. Likewise, another communist
rebel group and officially designated terrorist group, ELN, has been
in on-and-off peace negotiations. However, their group has walked
away from the table, each time due to the tremendous profits from
cocaine.

Similarly,
Colombia’s former right-wing paramilitary terrorist group, AUC,
officially disbanded in 2006, but the majority of these men simply
splintered into various organized crime groups. The Colombian and
U.S. governments haven’t designated these groups as terrorists
because they seem to be more driven by greed than ideology.

However,
the tactics by Colombia’s crime groups are indisputably
terrorizing. These neo-paramilitary organized crime groups, known as
BACRIMs, exert totalitarian control in their territory. They
indiscriminately murder leftist activists, journalists, and human
rights workers. In some cases, they impose a 
9
P.M. curfew
 and
invisible borders that are enforced with the death penalty. That’s
in addition to their brand of “
social
cleansing
,”
i.e. murdering homeless, drug addicts, LGTBQ, etc.

This
leads to a concept mentioned in academia, “the crime-terrorism
nexus.” In other words, the line dividing organized crime from
terrorism is increasingly blurry. Also, many terrorist
organizations fund their activities from crime.

Various
nations were listed earlier by the highest homicide rates. However,
those studies don’t include countries at war. With that in mind,
it’s no secret that both sides of the Afghanistan War are funded
with opium profits. The Taliban are grossing an estimated $400
million annually from drugs. For many years, the Taliban simply
“taxed” drug traffickers in their territory, but credible reports
suggest that they’ve expanded into 
production.

Of
the 64 foreign terrorist organizations designated by the U.S. State
Department, twenty-three profit from illegal drugs to some
degree. Albeit, drug money is generally a small portion of the
budget for most terrorist organizations and it is usually derived
from “taxing” drug traffickers rather than direct participation.

North
Africa has become a major drug transshipment point for South American
cocaine headed to Europe and Asia. Heroin from Asian countries is
also often smuggled through this region. As a result, the
Somali-based, Al Qaeda-linked terrorist group, al Shabaab and the
West-Africa based Al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) profit from
this 
underground
market
.
Boko Haram not only taxes traffickers, but the group has expanded
their role in this racket. Furthermore, ISIS has taxed shipments of
Moroccan 
hashish destined
for Europe by way of Libya.

On
the other hand, there are terror groups, such as the Kurdistan
Workers Party (PKK) and the Islamic

Movement
of Uzbekistan (UMI), that are directly responsible for smuggling
large quantities of illegal drugs, which comprises a large portion of
their funding.

The
U.S. Government’s Role

These
links between terrorism and drug trafficking, ironically, have
boosted the DEA in a self-serving manner. In 2006, Congress amended
the PATRIOT Act with a 
statute regarding
drug trafficking that directly or indirectly benefits a foreign
terrorist organization. As a result, the DEA’s international
jurisdiction and budget expanded tremendously.

However,
the agency has launched a series of high-profile cases that have
resulted in major headlines, instead of actual narco-terrorists being
captured. Case in point, three West Africans were indicted in 2009
from an undercover sting operation involving DEA informants who posed
as members of the FARC.

The
informants repeatedly told the traffickers that they wanted to do
business with Al Qaeda. Hence, these men simply 
pretended to
have links with a terrorist group to seal the deal. Nonetheless, this
aspect of the case hasn’t been widely reported and this case was a
major PR win for the DEA.

On
the other hand, the DEA had built a long-running and credible
investigation, Project Cassandra, against Hezbollah. Their group is
widely known as being sponsored by the Iranian government. However,
Hezbollah also has generated millions of dollars by smuggling
several 
tons of
South American cocaine. The group has business ties with the
Colombian FARC and the Brazilian 
PCC.

Several
high-level members of Hezbollah were implicated in Project Cassandra.
However, an impressive 
report by Politico revealed
that the Obama administration suppressed this investigation to help
finalize the nuclear deal with Iran.

One
of the open secrets of the War on Drugs is that the U.S. government,
among other nations, has given support to drug trafficking for
geopolitical purposes. In this case, the U.S. used the drug war as a
bargaining tool with an adversary.

However,
the U.S. government’s complicity with drug trafficking has
generally benefited its allies. That’s the case in the Afghanistan
War and it was certainly the case during the Vietnam War. Likewise,
drug money helped U.S. interests in dirty wars, such as the Contras
in Nicaragua or the Mujahideen in Afghanistan. Furthermore, several
narco-linked, right-wing dictators in Latin America, including Manuel
Noriega, have benefitted from strong U.S. support.

All
in all, there are many forms of violence resulting from the War on
Drugs. Nonetheless, our politicians have been unwilling to address
the root cause. As a result, government bureaucrats have pointed to
this violence to justify larger budgets for the drug war.

However,
with multiple decades of this failed policy behind us, we should
realize that the demand for illegal drugs will never decrease in a
substantial manner. Hence, continuing down this path will
continue to enable the violent tactics of low-level criminals, mafia
organizations, terrorists, dictators, and empire-driven governments.

By Brian
Saady
 / Creative
Commons
 / FEE.org / Report
a typo

===========================

* Al bericht men dan wel over de vele doden en bijvoorbeeld gevonden massagraven, de oorzaak wordt niet aangegeven in de reguliere (massa-) media en dat is nu juist de meer dan walgelijke oorlog tegen drugs, waar alleen de georganiseerde misdaad, het militair-industrieel complex en de geheime diensten in de VS het meest van profiteren, zelfs de DEA heeft in het verleden drugstransporten geregeld……… (uiteraard aangevuld met lobbyende politici voor één of meerdere van de hiervoor genoemde 3 partijen) Op die manier zijn ook aandeelhouders van het militair-industrieel complex verantwoordelijk te houden voor het enorme aantal moorden in deze smerige oorlog……….) Het feit dat de meeste drugs (en zelfs softdrugs) verboden zijn zorgt er uiteraard voor dat zoals gezegd de georganiseerde misdaad helemaal binnenloopt met de inkomsten uit die drugshandel. Zo kan je dan ook stellen dat regeringen die hard optreden tegen drugs, daarmee in feite lobbyen voor de drugsmaffia!!

Zie ook: ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

        en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States

        en: ‘VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

        en: ‘NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Het is 70 jaar gelden dat de CIA met ‘haar heilzame werk’ begon. 70 jaar waarin de CIA:

  • staatsgrepen pleegde, o.a. tegen Iran (destijds Perzië), Congo, Chili en Brazilië. 
  • ‘false flag’ operaties leidde, operaties zogenaamd uitgevoerd door vijanden van de VS, zodat de VS ‘acties’ tegen haar onwelgevallige, veelal democratisch gekozen regimes kon beginnen……. (niet zelden door het voeren van illegale oorlogen)
  • honderden (wellicht nog veel meer) verdachten martelde (en martelt), dit vooral in het buitenland en buitenlandse regimes (veelal niet democratisch gekozen) leerde ‘hoe het best kan worden gemarteld……. 
  • drugsoperaties leidde, zodat men met de opbrengsten geheime missies in het buitenland kon bekostigen……..
  • oud-nazi’s uit de gevangenis houden en hen zelfs naar de VS te brengen om daar hun werk voort te zetten. Voorts leidde de CIA een netwerk van 600 ex-nazi agenten in het door de Sovjet-Unie bezette deel van Duitsland, De dagelijkse leiding van deze nazi’s was in handen van Reinhard Gehlen, voormalig hoofd van de nazi-inlichtingendienst voor de Sovjet-Unie……

Er zijn nog veel meer zaken te noemen, waarvoor ik naar het onderstaande artikel van Anti-Media wil verwijzen

Happy
Birthday CIA: 7 Truly Terrible Things the Agency Has Done in 70 Years

September
18, 2017 at 5:26 pm

Written
by 
Carey
Wedler

(ANTIMEDIA) —
On
Monday, President Trump 
tweeted birthday
wishes to the Air Force and the CIA. Both
became 
official organizations
70 years ago on September 18, 1947, with the implementation of the
National Security Act of 1947.

After
spending years as a wartime intelligence agency called the Office of
Strategic Services, the agency was solidified as a key player in the
federal government’s operations with then-President Harry Truman’s
authorization.

In
the seventy years since, the CIA has committed a wide variety of
misdeeds, crimes, coups, and violence. Here are seven of the worst
programs they’ve carried out (that are known to the public):

    1.
    Toppling governments around the world
     —
    The CIA is best known for its first coup, Operation Ajax, in 1953,
    in which it ousted the democratically elected leader of Iran,
    Mohammed Mossadegh, reinstating the autocratic Shah, who favored
    western oil interests. That operation, which the CIA now 
    admits to
    waging with British intelligence, ultimately resulted in the 
    1979
    revolution
     and
    subsequent U.S. hostage crisis. Relations between the U.S. and Iran
    remain strained to this day, aptly described by the CIA-coined term
    blowback.”

But
the CIA has had a hand in 
toppling a
number of other democratically elected governments, from Guatemala
(1954) and the Congo (1960) to the Dominican Republic (1961), South
Vietnam (1963), Brazil (1964), and Chile (1973). The CIA has aimed to
install leaders who appease American interests,
often 
empowering oppressive, violent
dictators
.
This is only a partial list of countries where the CIA covertly
attempted to exploit and manipulate sovereign nations’ governments.

  1. Operation
    Paperclip 

    In one of the more bizarre CIA plots, the agency and other
    government departments employed Nazi scientists both within and
    outside the United States to gain an advantage over the
    Soviets. As 
    summarized by NPR:

The
aim [of Operation Paperclip] was to find and preserve German weapons,
including biological and chemical agents, but American scientific
intelligence officers quickly realized the weapons themselves were
not enough.

They
decided the United States needed to bring the Nazi scientists
themselves to the U.S. Thus began a mission to recruit top Nazi
doctors, physicists and chemists — including Wernher von Braun, who
went on to design the rockets that took man to the moon.

They
kept this plot secret, though they 
admitted to
it upon the release of 
Operation
Paperclip: The Secret Intelligence Program That Brought Nazi
Scientists To America
 by
Annie Jacobsen. In a book review, the CIA wrote that “
Henry
Wallace, former vice president and secretary of commerce, believed
the scientists’ ideas could launch new civilian industries and
produce jobs.” 

They
praised the book’s historical accuracy, noting “that the
Launch Operations Center at Cape Canaveral, Florida, was headed by
Kurt Debus, an ardent Nazi
.” They acknowledged that “General
Reinhard Gehlen, former head of Nazi intelligence operations against
the Soviets, was hired by the US Army and later by the CIA to operate
600 ex-Nazi agents in the Soviet zone of occupied Germany
.”

Remarkably,
they noted that Jacobsen “understandably questions the morality
of the decision to hire Nazi SS scientists,
” but praise her for
pointing out that it was done to fight Soviets. They also made sure
to add that the Soviets hired Nazis, too, apparently justifying their
own questionable actions by citing their most loathed enemy.

  1. Operation
    CHAOS
     —
    The FBI is widely known for its 
    COINTELPRO schemes
    to undermine 
    communist
    movements in the 1950s and anti-war, civil rights
    ,
    and 
    black
    power
     movements
    in the 1960s, but the CIA has not been implicated nearly as deeply
    because, technically, the CIA cannot legally engage in domestic
    spying. But that was of little concern to President Lyndon B.
    Johnson as opposition to the Vietnam war grew. According to
    former 
    New
    York Times
     journalist
    and Pulitzer Prize-winner Tim Weiner, as documented in his extensive
    CIA 
    historyLegacy
    of Ashes
    ,
    Johnson instructed then-CIA Director Richard Helms to break the law:

In
October 1967, a handful of CIA analysts joined in the first big
Washington march against the war. The president regarded protesters
as enemies of the state. He was convinced that the peace movement was
controlled and financed by Moscow and Beijing. He wanted proof. He
ordered Richard Helms to produce it.

Helms
reminded the president that the CIA was barred from spying on
Americans. He says Johnson told him: ‘I’m quite aware of that.
What I want for you is to pursue this matter, and to do what is
necessary to track down the foreign communists who are behind this
intolerable interference in our domestic affairs…’

Helms
obeyed. Weiner wrote:

In
a blatant violation of his powers under the law, the director of
central intelligence became a part-time secret police chief. The CIA
undertook a domestic surveillance operation, code-named Chaos. It
went on for almost seven years… Eleven CIA officers grew long hair,
learned the jargon of the New Left, and went off to infiltrate peace
groups in the United States and Europe
.”

According
to Weiner, “the agency compiled a computer index of 300,000
names of American people and organizations, and extensive files on
7,200 citizens. It began working in secret with police departments
all over America
.” Because they could not draw a “clear
distinction” between the new far left and mainstream opposition to
the war, the CIA spied on every major peace organization in the
country. President Johnson also wanted them to prove a connection
between foreign communists and the black power movement. “The
agency tried its best
,” Weiner noted, ultimately noting that
the CIA never found a shred of evidence that linked the leaders
of the American left or the black-power movement to foreign
governments.

  1. Infiltrating
    the media
     — Over the years, the CIA has successfully
    gained influence in the news media, as well as popular media like
    film and television. Its influence over the news began almost
    immediately after the agency was formed. As Weiner explained, CIA
    Director Allen Dulles established firm ties with newspapers:

Dulles
kept in close touch with the men who ran the New York Times, The
Washington Post, and the nation’s leading weekly magazines. He
could pick up the phone and edit a breaking story, make sure an
irritating foreign correspondent was yanked from the field, or hire
the services of men such as Time’s Berlin bureau chief and
Newsweek’s man in Tokyo
.”

He
continued:

It
was second nature for Dulles to plant stories in the press. American
newsrooms were dominated by veterans of the government’s wartime
propaganda branch, the Office of War Information…The men who
responded to the CIA’s call included Henry Luce and his editors at
Time, Life, and Fortune; popular magazines such as Parade, the
Saturday Review, and Reader’s Digest; and the most powerful
executives at CBS News. Dulles built a public-relations and
propaganda machine that came to include more than fifty news
organizations, a dozen publishing houses, and personal pledges of
support from men such as Axel Springer, West Germany’s most
powerful press baron
.”

The
CIA’s influence had not waned by 1977 when journalist Carl
Bernstein 
reported on
publications with CIA agents in their employ, as well as “
more
than 400 American journalists who in the past twenty five years
have secretly carried out assignments for the Central Intelligence
Agency.”

The
CIA has also successfully 
advised
on and influenced
 numerous
television shows, 
such
as
 Homeland and 24 and films like Zero
Dark Thirty 
and Argo,
which push narratives that ultimately favor the agency. According to
Tricia Jenkins, author of 
The
CIA in Hollywood: How the Agency Shapes Film & Television
a
concerted agency effort began in the 1990s to counteract negative
public perceptions of the CIA, but their influence reaches back
decades. In the 1950s, filmmakers produced films 
for the
CIA
,
including the 1954 film adaptation of George Orwell’s 
Animal
Farm
.

Researchers
Tom Secker and Matthew Alford, whose work has been 
published in
the 
American
Journal of Economics and Sociology
,
say their recent Freedom of Information Act requests have shown that
the CIA — along with the military — have 
influenced over
1,800 films and television shows, many of which have nothing to do
with CIA or military themes.

  1. Drug-induced
    Mind control
     –
    In the 1950s, the CIA began experimenting with drugs to determine
    whether they might be useful in extracting information.
    As 
    Smithsonian
    Magazine
     has noted of
    the MKUltra project:

The
project, which continued for more than a decade, was originally
intended to make sure the United States government kept up with
presumed Soviet advances in mind-control technology. It ballooned in
scope and its ultimate result, among other things, was illegal drug
testing on thousands of Americans
.”

Further:

The
intent of the project was to study ‘the use of biological and
chemical materials in altering human behavior,’ 
according
to
 the
official testimony of CIA director Stansfield Turner in 1977. The
project was conducted in extreme secrecy, Turner said, because of
ethical and legal questions surrounding the program and the negative
public response that the CIA anticipated if MKUltra should become
public.

Under
MKUltra, the CIA gave itself the authority to research how drugs
could:’ ‘promote the intoxicating effects of alcohol;’ ‘render
the induction of hypnosis easier;’ ‘enhance the ability of
individuals to withstand privation, torture and coercion;’ produce
amnesia, shock and confusion; and much more. Many of these questions
were investigated using unwitting test subjects, like drug-addicted
prisoners, marginalized sex workers and terminal cancer patients–
‘people who could not fight back,’ 
in
the words of
 Sidney
Gottlieb, the chemist who introduced LSD to the CIA.

Further,
as Weiner noted:

Under
its auspices, seven prisoners at a federal penitentiary in Kentucky
were kept high on LSD for seventy-seven consecutive days. When the
CIA slipped the same drug to an army civilian employee, Frank Olson,
he leaped out of the window of a New York Hotel.”

Weiner
added that senior CIA officers destroyed “almost all of the
records” of the programs, but that while the “evidence that
remains is fragmentary…it strongly suggests that use of secret
prisons for the forcible drug-induced questioning of suspect agents
went on throughout the 1950s.

Years
later, the CIA would be accused of distributing crack-cocaine into
poor black communities, though this is currently less substantiated
and 
supported mostly
by accounts of those who claim to have been involved.

  1. Brutal
    torture tactics
     —
    More recently, the CIA was 
    exposed for
    sponsoring abusive, disturbing terror tactics against detainees at
    prisons housing terror suspects. An extensive 2014 Senate report
    documented agents committing sexual abuse, forcing detainees to
    stand on broken legs, waterboarding them so severely it sometimes
    led to convulsions, and imposing forced rectal feeding, to name a
    few examples. Ultimately, the agency had very little actionable
    intelligence to show for their torture tactics but 
    lied to
    suggest they did, according to the torture report. Their torture
    tactics 
    led the
    International Criminal Court to suggest the CIA, along with the U.S.
    armed forces, could be guilty of war crimes for their abuses.

    7.
    Arming radicals — The CIA has a long habit of arming
    radical, extremist groups that view the United States as enemies. In
    1979, the CIA set out to support Afghan rebels in their bid to
    defeat the Soviet occupation of the Middle Eastern country. As
    Weiner wrote, in 1979, “Prompted by Zbigniew Brzezinski,
    President Carter signed a covert-action order for the CIA to provide
    the Afghan rebels with medical aid, money, and propaganda.

As
Weiner detailed later in his book:

The
Pakistani intelligence chiefs who doled out the CIA’s guns and
money favored the Afghan factions who proved themselves most capable
in battle. Those factions also happened to be the most committed
Islamists. No one dreamed that the holy warriors could ever turn
their jihad against the United States
.”

Though
some speculate the CIA directly armed Osama bin Laden, that is yet to
be fully proven or admitted. What is clear is that western
media 
revered him
as a valuable fighter against the Soviets, that he 
arrived to
fight in Afghanistan in1980, and that al-Qaeda emerged from the
mujahideen, who were beneficiaries of the CIA’s program. Stanford
University has 
noted that Bin
Laden and Abdullah Azzam, a prominent Palestinian cleric,
established
Al Qaeda from the fighters, financial resources, and training and
recruiting structures left over from the anti-Soviet war
.”
Much of those “structures” were provided by the agency.
Intentionally or not, the CIA helped fuel the rise of the terror
group.

Weiner
noted that as the CIA failed in other countries like Libya, by the
late 1980s “Only the mujahideen, the Afghan holy warriors, were
drawing blood and scenting victory. The CIA’s Afghan operation was
now a $700-million-dollar-a-year-program
” and represented 80%
of the overseas budget of the clandestine services. “The CIA’s
briefing books never answered the question of what would happen when
a militant Islamic army defeated the godless invaders of
Afghanistan
,” though Tom Twetten, “the number two man in
the clandestine service in the summer of 1988
,” was tasked with
figuring out what would happen with the Afghan rebels. “We don’t
have any plan
,” he concluded.

Apparently
failing to learn their lesson, the CIA adopted nearly the exact same
policy in Syria decades later, arming what they called “moderate
rebels” against the Assad regime. Those groups
ultimately 
aligned with
al-Qaeda groups. One CIA-backed faction made headlines last year
for 
beheading a
child (though President Trump cut off the CIA program in June, the
military 
continues to
align with “moderate” groups).

Unsurprisingly,
this list is far from complete. The CIA has engaged in a wide variety
of 
extrajudicial
practice
,
and there are likely countless transgressions we have yet to learn
about.

As
Donald Trump cheers the birthday of an agency he himself
once 
criticized,
it should be abundantly clear that the nation’s covert spy agency
deserves scrutiny and skepticism — not celebration.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

===================================

Moet u nagaan, dan durft men nog te spreken over ‘fake news’ en een land als Rusland de schuld voor veel internet ellende te geven en te beschuldigen van agressief gedrag………….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Zie ook: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

        en: ‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

        en: ‘CIA erkent dat Israël samen met Saoedi-Arabië ‘vecht tegen terreur’, die ze NB zelf hebben georganiseerd……..

        en: ‘VS centraal commando werkt in Syrië samen met IS en verklaarde Rusland de oorlog………

        en: ‘Al Qaida de bondgenoot van de VS in de strijd tegen…… terrorisme! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘ (intussen heeft de VS ‘Al Qaida Syrië’ van de zwarte lijst met terreurorganisaties gehaald!!)

       en: ‘CIA valt nogmaals door de mand als wapenleverancier van IS…….

      en: ‘Van Baalen (VVD EU topgraaier) het is moeilijk te zien wie je moet steunen: Al Qaida, Al Qaida of Al Qaida……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

      en: ‘Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..

Duterte (massamoordenaar en president Filipijnen) wordt ongemoeid gelaten door Paus Franciscus……..

Duterte heeft de laatste maand al meer dan 100 doden op z’n geweten (sinds zijn aantreden intussen duizenden), dit middels zijn haatzaaierij in de Filipijnse media t.a.v. drugsgebruikers en zijn vrijbrief aan de politie om drugsgebruikers en dealers te vermoorden……. Dit terwijl hij zelf de dodelijkste harddrug gebruikt die bestaat, t.w. alcohol…….

De Filipijnse politie is intussen zelfs meermaals betrapt op het standrechtelijk executeren van tieners en god hoe is het mogelijk, dat gaat het grootste deel van de Filipijnse bevolking toch net iets te ver………

Over het Filipijnse volk gesproken dat is voor het grootste deel rooms katholiek. Hoe is het mogelijk dat de wolf in schaapskleren paus Franciscus niet wekelijks een oproep doet aan het Filipijnse volk in opstand te komen tegen de psychopathische moordenaar Duterte? Waarom maant deze paus de Filipijnse priesters en bisschoppen niet, om het barbaarse geweld van Duterte zoveel en zo vaak mogelijk te veroordelen vanaf de kansel???

Gevalletje ‘paus in oorlogstijd………???’

Overigens is deze paus Bergoglio, zijn echte naam, al net zo’n massamoordenaar als zijn voorgangers, daar hij nog steeds het verbod op anticonceptie handhaaft……. Wat dat betreft is Duterte nog een kleine jongen………

Trouwens ongelofelijk dat Duterte niet door de EU is veroordeeld voor zijn moorddadig bewind, ja men stelt uiterst verontrust ter zijn, maar onderneemt geen actie…. Als Putin of Kim Yung-un zelfs maar een scheet laten, treft men al sancties……….

Zie ook: ‘Duterte, de Filipijnse neonazi-president heeft de jacht op Filipijnen met een Chinese achtergrond geopend………..

       en: ‘Trump prijst Duterte die op zijn beurt verkrachtingen aanprijst……..

       en: ‘Mensenrechtenschendingen aangejaagd na inzet VS militairen in de Filipijnen………

       en: ‘Koenders en Rutte, waar blijft jullie commentaar op de standrechtelijke executies in de Filipijnen? Iets teveel Nederlandse handelsbelangen in dat fascistische geregeerde land??

       en: ‘De wereld moet zich uitspreken tegen de fascistische psychopaat Duterte, president van de Filipijnen

DEA (VS) verklaart cannabis als ongevaarlijk, maar weigert de medicinale kracht van cannabis te erkennen……..

Anti-Media bracht afgelopen woensdag het bericht dat de Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) in de VS cannabis als ongevaarlijk genotsmiddel heeft gekwalificeerd. Sterker nog het gebruik van cannabis geeft een groot aantal voordelen!!

Zo wordt je gelukkig en vrolijk door het gebruik van cannabis, het zorgt voor socialisering, spraakzaamheid en laat de gebruiker beter genieten van muziek en kunst, aldus de DEA rapportage.

‘Uiteraard’ wijst de DEA wel op negatieve effecten die kunnen optreden na het gebruik van cannabis, zoals bronchitis en longemfyseem, terwijl daar bij gebruik van cannabis zonder tabak geen bewijzen voor zijn.

De DEA wil verder niet ingaan op de sterk geneeskrachtige werking van cannabis en producten gemaakt van cannabis, dit alleen omdat cannabis op de nummer 1 lijst voor (verboden/gevaarlijke) drugs staat……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

In het rapport van de DEA ‘Drugs of Abuse’ staat vreemd genoeg niet de harddrug die verreweg de meeste schade toebrengt en dat op meerdere vlakken, alcohol!!

Het valt nog mee dat de DEA ‘zo gunstig rapporteerde’ over cannabis, daar de alcoholindustrie via lobby kapitalen steekt in het verboden houden van o.a. cannabis………

Al met al een mooi artikel van Carey Wedler, ook informatief over andere drugs als MDMA en LSD. Voorts wijst Wedler op de hypocrisie t.a.v. voorschrift medicatie in de rapportage van de DEA, die vooral in de VS voor veel problemen zorgt en een enorm aantal doden veroorzaakt, zoals men het afgelopen jaar een aantal keren heeft gemeld in de reguliere VS media……

The
DEA Just Admitted Weed Has Never Killed Anyone and Causes ‘Happiness’

June
28, 2017 at 4:08 pm

Written
by 
Carey
Wedler

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) The
Drug Enforcement Agency just admitted that cannabis has never killed
anyone. Ever. They also acknowledged that the little green plant,
which has been used across 
civilizations for
thousands of years, causes “merriment” and “happiness.” But
they still want to keep it illegal.

The
new 94-page 
report
released this week
 is
entitled “Drugs of Abuse” and is intended to foster a better
understanding of the dangers of drug consumption. “
Education
plays a critical role in preventing substance abuse
,”
the document opens. “
Drugs
of Abuse, A DEA Resource Guide, is designed to be a reliable resource
on the most commonly abused and misused drugs in the United States
.”

While
the report correctly includes seriously dangerous drugs like heroin,
fentanyl, and pharmaceutical opioids, it also includes substances
increasingly proven to be far less harmful than the government would
like its citizens to believe — “drugs” that actually have
medicinal properties. The report fails to acknowledge these benefits
throughout its in-depth explanations.

Nevertheless,
when it comes to cannabis, the DEA is surprisingly honest, at least
in part. Describing the plant for what it is — a “dry,
shredded green/brown mix of flowers, stems, seeds, and leaves

— they note that “[n]o deaths from overdose of marijuana have
been reported.

They
even acknowledge that cannabis use can cause “[m]erriment,
happiness, and even exhilaration at high doses
,” as well as
[d]isinhibition, relaxation, increased sociability, and
talkativeness
.” The illegal, allegedly dangerous substance even
causes — gasp — “[e]nhanced sensory perception, giving rise
to increased appreciation of music, art, and touch
.”

Of
course, the report focuses far more on the “dangerous” effects of
the plant, including bronchitis, emphysema, paranoia, anxiety, panic
attacks, and a litany of other alleged dangers. Despite the fact that
research has found marijuana use has few significant effects on
 lung
health
 —
far less than 
legal tobacco
use
 —
and the fact that mounting evidence shows varieties of cannabis like
CBD (cannabidiol) can help treat 
anxiety and
other 
mental
health ailments
,
the DEA displays no such nuance in their explanations, instead
appearing to base their assessment of safety on the 
legality of
the drug.

For
example, though they claim cannabis can cause nausea, they go on to
explain in the very same section that “Marinol, a synthetic
version of THC, the active ingredient found in the marijuana plant,
can be prescribed for the control of nausea and vomiting caused by
chemotherapeutic agents used in the treatment of cancer and to
stimulate appetite in AIDS patients.

Wait,
what?

Indeed,
though cannabis is indisputably a form of medicine, whether for
nausea, anxiety, Parkinson’s disease, Crohn’s disease, chronic
pain, or countless other disorders, the DEA insists that because it
is a Schedule I drug, it has no medicinal value.

The
same pattern emerges with psychedelic drugs, which the federal
government also claims have no medicinal value despite increasing
evidence that MDMA can help treat PTSD (the FDA itself has
authorized 
research into
the drug’s potential for helping those who suffer with it) and that
psychedelic 
mushrooms and LSD can
help treat depression.

None
of this is acknowledged in the report. Instead, myths that they are
addictive and dangerous abound.

Further,
conspicuously absent from “Drugs of Abuse” is one of the most
dangerous, addictive, and harmful drugs in the history of mankind:
alcohol. 
According to
the government, itself, alcohol is 
responsible for
88,000 deaths per year in the United States, and 15.1 million
Americans suffer from “Alcohol Use Disorder.” But the substance
remains legal. Interestingly, the 
alcohol
industry
 remains
one of the largest anti-marijuana legalization lobbies.

The
agency’s dogmatic adherence to arbitrary law is the reason why
alcohol is excluded from this comprehensive attempt to educate
Americans on the dangers of substance abuse. As the report explains
in the introduction, “There are also a number of substances that
are abused but not regulated under the CSA [Controlled Substance
Act]. Alcohol and tobacco, for example, are specifically exempt from
control by the CSA,
” and are therefore not included in “Drugs
of Abuse.”

Other
hypocrisies abound. For example, the report lists benzodiazepines
like Xanax as potentially addictive drugs, noting that those who use
benzodiazepines
to treat anxiety are likely to be physically dependent on that
medication.” 
But
according to the CSA, on which they base their entire drug
enforcement agenda, drugs like Xanax 
have “low
potential for abuse and low risk of dependence
.”
This is patently false, as 13.5 million Americans are dependent
on
 drugs
like Xanax
,
overdoses are on the rise, and side effects of quitting the
drug 
include heart
palpitations, panic attacks, and seizures in extreme cases. Yet the
DEA, which enforces the CSA, admits in its own report that Xanax
causes physical dependency.

Ultimately,
while the DEA admits cannabis has never caused deaths and can make
for a good deal of “merriment” and “exhilaration,” the most
telling aspect of the report is the futility of banning drugs in the
first place. The exclusion of alcohol from this report — except the
countless instances where it acknowledges that the drug can
intensify 
other drug
experiences — shows the federal government’s tirades against
“drugs” have nothing to do with keeping people safe. Prohibition
in the 1920s 
proved
this
,
and the ongoing failure that is the “War on Drugs” continues to
prove it today.

Even
abusing the dangers of cannabis, MDMA, and other drugs the DEA lists
in its report are accurate, the fact remains that other legal drugs
pose just as many, if not more dangers, and individuals should be
free to take risks with their own health, just as they are with
alcohol and tobacco.

Legal
or not, people will find ways to use drugs, and while the authors of
“Drugs of Abuse” likely have good intentions, their efforts are
futile in their lack of honesty about many of the substances listed
and their continued belief that more government and throwing
non-violent people in cages will solve the deeply-rooted problem of
addiction.

Opinion
/
 Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

VS is grootste producent van vluchtelingen, aldus VN rapport……….

De VN berekende dat vorig jaar 65 miljoen mensen (!!!) op de vlucht zijn geslagen vanwege een ‘dodelijk conflict’ (‘dodelijk conflict’, lees: illegale oorlog door VS begonnen of door VS veroorzaakte chaos, bijvoorbeeld middels een staatsgreep; waar de VS niet wordt genoemd in het VN rapport…..)………

De UNHCR die e.e.a. uitzocht verduidelijkte het cijfer, door voor te rekenen, dat er elke 3 seconden iemand moet vluchten…….. UNHRC voorzitter Filippo Grandi vindt dit onaanvaardbaar, echter wat hij niet vermeldde is wie er verantwoordelijk is voor de grote vluchtelingenstromen en dat is zowel direct als indirect de VS…….

De landen waarvan de meeste vluchtelingen komen (waar een flink aantal vluchtelingen ook in eigen land bleven, waar ze veelal alsnog niet veilig zijn) zijn Syrië, Afghanistan en Irak met respectievelijk 12, 4,7 en 4,2 miljoen vluchtelingen!! Afghanistan en Irak werden direct illegaal aangevallen door de VS, waar de oorlog in Syrië het gevolg is van manipulaties van de VS (en haar coalitiegenoten), waartoe de eerste stappen al in 2006 werden gezet………

De VS en landen als Saoedi-Arabië en Israël hebben terreurgroepen in Syrië van geld, wapens, voertuigen, training en medische zorg voorzien. Terreurgroepen die de laatste 6 jaar grote misdaden begingen (en nog begaan) tegen de Syrische bevolking, waardoor die op de vlucht zijn geslagen……

Colombia is het tweede land, wat betreft het aantal mensen die zijn gevlucht, maar liefst 7,7 miljoen mensen verlieten daar huis en haard……. Ook in Colombia is de VS voor een groot deel verantwoordelijk voor de reden waarom mensen vluchtten. Dit door de oorlog tegen drugs, waar de VS o.a. rechtse doodseskaders steunt en als het even kan grote delen van het loerwoud vergiftigd, zodat daar geen cocaïne kan worden geteeld en landbouwgrond onbruikbaar is geworden….. Dit nog naast het volproppen van het leger met VS wapens, waar Bill Clinton ‘Plan Columbia’ (Eng.) introduceerde. Hiermee werd het geweld in Colombia verder opgezweept en verdwenen mensenrechten naar de achtergrond, gevolg: vluchtelingen……..

Ook in Soedan heeft de VS enorme ellende veroorzaakt, de afscheiding van Zuid-Soedan is één op één ingegeven door de VS….. De reden daarvoor: Zuid-Soedan bezit grote olievoorraden, waarvoor China tegen de zin van de VS contracten had afgesloten met wat nu Noord-Soedan is…… Intussen zijn 3,3, miljoen Zuid-Soedanezen op de vlucht geslagen……

Grandi roept de wereld op te voorkomen dat mensen op de vlucht moeten slaan en roept op tot het aanpakken van het vluchtelingenprobleem. De schrijver van het hieronder geplaatste artikel, Webb stelt terecht dat Grandi beter eens op de oorzaak kan wijzen:de ‘onlesbare’ zucht naar verovering, macht en winst door het militair-industrieel complex in de VS (waar ter verduidelijking ook het politieke leiderschap toebehoort)….

UN
Report Reveals Nations Producing Most Refugees Were Targets of US
Intervention

June
22, 2017 at 7:19 pm

Written
by 
Whitney
Webb

A
UN report has shown that more than 65 million people were forced to
leave their home countries last year, becoming refugees due to deadly
conflict. The top nations from which refugees fled have one thing in
common, they were all targets of US intervention.

(MPN) — A
United Nations
 report has
shed light on the world’s burgeoning crisis of displaced peoples,
finding that a record 65.6 million were forced to vacate their homes
in 2016 alone. More than half of them were minors.

The Office
of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees
 (UNHCR),
which drafted the report, put the figure into perspective, stating
that increasing conflict and persecution worldwide have led to “one
person being displaced every three seconds – less than the time it
takes to read this sentence.”

UN
High Commissioner Filippo Grandi called the figure “unacceptable”
and called for “solidarity and a common purpose in preventing and
resolving the crisis.”


However,
what the UN report failed to mention was the role of U.S. foreign
intervention, indirect or direct, in fomenting the conflicts
responsible for producing most of the world’s refugees.

According
to the report, three of the nations producing the highest number of
refugees are 
Syria
(12 million refugees created in 2016), Afghanistan (4.7 million) and
Iraq (4.2 million).

Watch
the UNHCR’s New Global Trends Report:

The
conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan are known to be
 the
direct result of U.S. military invasions
 in
the early 2000s, as well as the U.S.’ ongoing occupation of those
nations. Decades after invading both countries, the U.S.’
destabilizing military presence in Iraq and Afghanistan
 has
continued to increase
 in
recent years, with the Trump administration most recently
announcing
 plans
to send thousands
 of
soldiers to Afghanistan in the coming months. It is worth noting
that 
each U.S.
soldier in Afghanistan
 costs
U.S. taxpayers $2.1 million.

While
the U.S. has yet to directly invade Syria, 
the
U.S. role in the conflict is clear
 and
Syria’s destabilization and the overthrow of its current
regime 
have
long been planned
 by
the U.S. government.

The
U.S. and its allies, particularly 
Israel and Saudi
Arabia
,
have consistently funded “rebel” groups that have not only
perpetuated the Syrian conflict for six long years, but have
also 
committed
atrocity after atrocity
 targeting
civilians in Syrian cities, towns, and communities – 
a
major factor
 in
convincing Syrians to leave their homes.

Tulsi Gabbard 

@TulsiGabbard

The U.S. must stop supporting terrorists who are destroying Syria and her people.https://youtu.be/LHqpneMd9OM 

The
report ranks Colombia as the world’s second-largest producer of
refugees, with 7.7 million Colombians displaced in 2016. Like Syria,
the U.S. has not directly invaded Colombia, but is
 known
to have extensively funded paramilitary groups
,
also known as “death squads,” in the country since the 1980s,
when then-U.S. President Ronald Reagan declared a “war on drugs”
in Colombia.

U.S.
efforts 
have
long helped fuel
 the
civil war between the Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia (FARC)
and pro-government, U.S.-funded paramilitary groups. This conflict
has lasted for more than half a century.


In
2000, then-President Bill Clinton’s administration funded
 the
disastrous “Plan Colombia”
 with
$4 billion in U.S. taxpayer funds, ostensibly to fight drug
trafficking and insurgents. Almost all of this money was used to fund
the Colombian military and its weapon purchases. “Plan Colombia”
ultimately intensified armed violence, military deployments, human
rights abuses by the Colombian military, and – of course – the
internal displacement of Colombians. The legacy of U.S. policy in
Colombia and its continuing support of the nation’s right-wing,
neo-liberal regime have ensured that the chaos continues into the
present.

Ben Norton 


 @BenjaminNorton

In a destructive decades-long war that has been fueled & prolonged by billions of dollars from the US’ Plan Colombia https://twitter.com/JuliaCarmel__/status/840208328684904449 

Tailfoot McWalshy @BuglegsMcWalshy

@BenjaminNorton Clinton ran on Plan Colombia and its sponsoring right wing death squads. http://m.huffpost.com/us/entry/8557396 

         Photo published for Sorry, Hillary, Plan Colombia Has Been a Drug War Disaster

Photo published for Sorry, Hillary, Plan Colombia Has Been a Drug War Disaster


Sorry, Hillary, Plan Colombia Has Been a Drug War Disaster

This week Hillary Clinton again revealed a blind spot for the drug war and a

huffingtonpost.com

In
addition to the above, U.S foreign policy is also to blame for the
conflict in South Sudan, where the UN report found was home to the
fastest-growing displacement of people in the world. In 2011, the

U.S.
pushed South Sudan to secede from Sudan, as South Sudan holds the
vast majority of Sudan’s oil reserves — the largest oil reserves
in all of Africa. The U.S.’ push for the creation of an independent
South Sudan
 dislodged
Chinese claims
 to
Sudanese oil, as the Chinese had previously signed oil contracts with
the (now Northern) Sudanese government.

But
when nation-building efforts went awry and civil war broke out just
two years later,
 some
analysts suggested
 that
the conflict only started when South Sudan’s president began to
cozy up to China. According to the UN report, approximately 3.3
million people in South Sudan have fled their homes since the war
began.

Grandi
has called on the world’s nations to help prevent and resolve the
global refugee crisis. But he would also do well to point out the
common cause uniting many of the world’s worst conflicts – the
U.S. military-industrial complex’s insatiable lust for conquest,
power and profit.

by Whitney
Webb
 /
Republished with permission / 
MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

=====================================

Zie ook:

Afghanistan: VS gaat terreur vergroten

VS gaf sinds 2001 meer dan 5,9 biljoen dollar uit aan oorlogen, ofwel: $ 5,933.000.000.000…….

VS bombardeert ziekenhuis Artsen zonder Grenzen in Kunduz, 9 medewerkers van deze organisatie kwamen om het leven……..
       

VS bombardeerde het Artsen zonder Grenzen ziekenhuis in Kunduz niet per ongeluk………. Ofwel: VS terreur op grote schaal, over een lange periode!!

Artsen zonder Grenzen ziekenhuis: tijdens bombardement werden vluchtenden vanaf relatief korte afstand beschoten……. Vergissing??

VS standrechtelijke executies: voor de zoveelste keer niet-verdachten slachtoffer drone-aanval >> 15 Afghaanse politieagenten vermoord….

Afghaanse oorlog in het 17de jaar: Taliban nu sterker dan eerder sinds de VS de oorlog van 2001 begon

Ten Broeke (VVD) steunt beslissing Trump de illegale oorlog in Afghanistan te laten voortduren en zo meer terreur te creëren……..

Afghanistan: de VS stelt de papaverteelt veilig voor de komende jaren………..

VS test grootste niet-nucleaire bom in testgebied….. Afghanistan!!‘ (o.a. Afghanistan is een testgebied voor de wapenfabrikanten en daaronder versta ik ook de fabrikanten van rollend, varend en vliegend oorlogstuig)

Military-Industrial Complex Stock Prices Surge After Trump’s Afghan War Speech

Luchtmacht VS gooide in augustus meer dan 500 bommen op Afghanistan……….

Trump gaat oorlog in Afghanistan winnen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

6 Reasons Why Trump’s Afghanistan “Policy” Is Not a Deep State Plot

14 Times Trump Warned Against Doing What He Just Did in Afghanistan

=========================================

Hier nog een paar voorbeelden van VS terreur:

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..‘ (tot het jaar 2000)

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……‘ (bericht van 5 oktober 2018)

Trump prijst Duterte die op zijn beurt verkrachtingen aanprijst……..

De psychopathische clown en intussen volleerd oorlogsmisdadiger Trump heeft op 29 april jl. de psychopathische massamoordenaar en president van de Filipijnen, Duterte geprezen voor het vermoorden van drugsverslaafden en handelaren…….* “Keep up the good work, you are doing an amzing job, aldus luidden de uitgelekte woorden van Trump…….

Het Belgische VRT Radio1 nieuws van 11.00 u. afgelopen zaterdag, wist te melden dat opperschoft Duterte het gore lef had om militairen, die hij inzet tegen moslimextremisten op het eiland Mindanao, te beloven dat wanneer zij worden gepakt vanwege het verkrachten van vrouwen, hij de schuld op zich zal nemen…….. Met andere woorden: verkracht maar raak….!!!

Overigens heb ik dit nieuws nog niet op het Nederlandse Radio1 gehoord, net zo min als ik PvdA sierdrol Koenders, de zwaar disfunctionerend demissionair minister van BuZa, kritiek heb horen uiten op Duterte of op Trump…….. Zelfs zijn wanpresterende partijcollega en dito minister Ploemen (zelf vrouw) maakte hier geen woord aan vuil……..

Hier het bericht van Anti-Media, één van de bronnen waarop mijn bericht is gebaseerd:

Trump
Thinks Murdering Drug Addicts In The Streets Is An ‘Excellent’
Government Policy


Trump Thinks Murdering Drug Addicts In The Streets Is An ‘Excellent’ Government Policy

(broodje worst!)

May
26, 2017 at 5:08 pm

Written
by 
Anti-Media
Staff

(ANTIMEDIA) Philippines
 On
Wednesday — a day after it was
 leaked that
during a phone call last month Donald Trump praised Philippine
President Rodrigo Duterte for doing an 
excellent
job”
 with
his country’s war on drugs — it was reported that the Southeast
Asian leader is thinking of declaring full martial law in the name of
fighting terrorism.

Philippines
President Rodrigo Duterte said his martial law declaration for the
country’s restive south could be expanded ‘throughout the
country’ in order to combat the rise of ISIS.”

The
current order affects only a southern group of islands and
was
 declared Tuesday
after clashes broke out between militants and government troops.
Citing the violence, Duterte, who cut short a visit to Russia to fly
home, says it’s his duty as a leader to provide safety for his
citizens.

I
had to declare martial law in the Mindanao group of islands,”
 the
president
 said at
a news conference in Manila. “
It
is our constitutional duty to enforce the law and provide security.”

It
was Tuesday that three government troops
 died and
12 others were injured when militants reportedly took over several
state buildings, torched others — including a school, a jail, and a
church — and took hostages.

As
the world has just witnessed with the attack in Manchester, the
governments’ responses to acts of terror are almost universally the
same: lock it down.
 From Reuters on
Tuesday:

Countries
across the world will tighten security ahead of major cultural and
sports events after a suicide bombing in Britain that killed at least
22 people, but experts say reinforced measures will do little to
prevent determined individuals.

President
Duterte — if he makes good on his proposition of full martial law —
appears willing to take this philosophy to the extreme. Perhaps this
should come as no surprise, however, given the man’s
documented
 history of
what many find to be human rights abuses.

This
is why so many people were offended this week after 
The
Intercept
 published
the
 transcript of
a phone call between Duterte and Donald Trump. During that call,
which took place April 29, the U.S. president said the Filipino
leader was doing an “
unbelievable
job on the drug problem”
 in
his country.

You
are a good man,”
 Trump
says to Duterte. “
Keep
up the good work. You are doing an amazing job.”

Duterte
thanked Trump for his kind words, saying drugs are the “
scourge
of my nation now and I have to do something to preserve the Filipino
nation.”

That something” Duterte
referred has been taking place since his election in June and
was
 summarized by The
Intercept
 in
its reporting on the April conversation:

Police
have killed over 
7,000
people
,
devastated poor areas of Manila and other cities, and used the drug
war as a pretext to murder 
government
officials
 and
community leaders.

Duterte’s
version of a war on drugs has been roundly
 condemned by
the United Nations, and even Trump’s own State
Department
 acknowledges thousands
of “
extrajudicial
killings”
 in
the Philippines — saying it’s the country’s “
chief
human rights concern.”

Creative
Commons
 Anti-Media Report
a typo

=======================

* U begrijpt dat de harddrug die direct en indirect de meeste schade aanricht, alcohol, is uitgesloten van deze oorlog tegen drugsgebruikers en -handelaren….. Duterte lust wel een glas of drie!!

Zie ook: ‘Did You Know ISIS is Now in The Philippines? Here’s What You Aren’t Being Told‘ (op Anti-Media; zet uw adblocker aan, zo mist u de vreselijke reclames. De Adblock Plus van Google, voor o.a. Chrome en Firefox doet dit perfect)

Zie ook: ‘Duterte, de Filipijnse neonazi-president heeft de jacht op Filipijnen met een Chinese achtergrond geopend………..

       en: ‘Mensenrechtenschendingen aangejaagd na inzet VS militairen in de Filipijnen………

       en: ‘Koenders en Rutte, waar blijft jullie commentaar op de standrechtelijke executies in de Filipijnen? Iets teveel Nederlandse handelsbelangen in dat fascistische geregeerde land??

       en: ‘Duterte (massamoordenaar en president Filipijnen) wordt ongemoeid gelaten door Paus Franciscus……..

       en: ‘De wereld moet zich uitspreken tegen de fascistische psychopaat Duterte, president van de Filipijnen

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels die u hieronder aantreft, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Mindanao’.