Het Joint Investigation Team (JIT) heeft vandaag weer een presentatie gegeven en hoe is het mogelijk: plotseling heeft men een groot deel van de BUK-raket, inclusief de bijna complete kop (daar kom ik zo op terug)
Fred Westerbeke van JIT met de overblijfselen van de raket Foto ANP
Voorts stelt het JIT dat men de gang van de raket heeft kunnen volgen van Rusland naar het gebied van de separatisten in Oost-Oekraïne en terug naar Rusland…… Het JIT beschikt dan ook sinds kort over een tijdmachine…..
De raket wordt definitief toegeschreven aan Rusland, terwijl deze in 1986 zou zijn gefabriceerd in de Sovjet-Unie en voor hetzelfde geld uit één van de voormalige Oostblok landen kan zijn gekomen, bijvoorbeeld uit Oekraïne…… Het kan nog sterker mensen: de raket zou hebben toebehoord aan de 53ste anti-luchtmacht brigade die gestationeerd is in Koersk……
Na bijna 4 jaar heeft het JIT dus getuigen gevonden die niet alleen al de voorgaande zaken hebben verklaard (vorig jaar waren deze getuigen er amper en deze waren bovendien bepaald niet betrouwbaar), bovendien beschikt men plotseling over een video waarop te zien is dat de raket wordt afgeschoten richting vlucht MH17…….. Eerdere video’s bleken niet van de bewuste datum te zijn….. Over manipulatie gesproken……
Dan de raket zoals te zien op de foto hierboven: de kop is weliswaar gedeukt, maar voor het grootste deel intact: hoe is dat mogelijk als deze raket is ontploft??? Eerder vond een Nederlandse ‘journalist’ een fragment van de raket, in een gebied dat nauwkeurig was uitgekamd op dergelijke bewijzen, nu bjna 4 jaar later heeft men plotsklaps een bijna complete raket…….
Opvallend dat het JIT weer vraagt aan getuigen zich te melden, immers met deze presentatie heeft men alleen de militairen nog niet aangewezen…… Men roept zelfs militairen van ee 53ste Russische brigade op zich te melden, hen wordt als zij zich melden bescherming geboden (en een mooi huis plus een gegarandeerd inkomen…..) Wellicht zijn er ook nog wat neonazi’s, die dienen in de bataljons vechtend tegen de separatisten in Oost-Oekraïne, bereid een verklaring af te leggen, kan het JIT volgend jaar, of wellicht over een half jaar een nieuwe presentatie met ‘keihard bewijs’ geven……..
Moeten we dit echt serieus nemen…….???? Belachelijk!
PS: het is altijd zaak te onderzoeken wie er baat heeft bij een dergelijke grote misdaad….. In dit geval was dat de Oekraïense junta van de corrupte neonazi Porosjenko, die de separatisten en de Russen bijna direct na het neerkomen van MH17 de schuld in de schoenen schoof, terwijl oh wonder alle radarposten van Oekraïne waren uitgeschakeld ten tijde van het neerhalen van vlucht MH17……. Ook de VS had belang bij het zwartmaken van de Russen, al was het alleen maar om Oekraïne de NAVO in te kunnen loodsen…. De VS had tenslotte niet voor niets 4 miljard dollar in het destabiliseren van Oekraïne gestoken (door Hillary Clinton, destijds minister van BuZa in de VS, dit daar Janoekovytsj terecht had ingezet op een pro-Russische koers), om zo een staatsgreep te kunnen forceren, deze opzet lukte en de VS plaatste Porosjenko in het zadel……. Intussen controleren de neonazi’s de Oekraïense junta, zijn een aantal politieke partijen verboden en wordt het werken echte journalisten onmogelijk gemaakt, zelfs middels fysiek geweld…… Oekraïne is zo goed als failliet (ondanks miljarden steun uit het westen) en hebben Porosjenko en zijn kliek heel vette buitenlandse bankrekeningen (ook in Nederland)………
Mijn excuus, bij plaatsing vergeten: Rusland en de separatisten hadden er totaal geen belang bij in een slecht daglicht te worden gesteld……
In het volgende artikel op Global Research betoogt professor Michel Chossudovsky dat vlucht MH17 is neergehaald door een MIG straaljager. Lees dit artikel en zegt het voort. U vindt o.a. een link naar 100 berichten op Global Research over de ramp met MH17. Het artikel vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke en bevat o.a. een eerder artikel van Chossudovsky:
SUPPORT
MH17 TRUTH: MACHINE GUN-LIKE HOLES INDICATE SHELLING FROM A MILITARY
AIRCRAFT. NO EVIDENCE OF A SURFACE-TO-AIR MISSILE ATTACK.
More
lies prevail with regard to MH17. Recent press reports quoting the
Dutch Safety Board’s October 2015 final report point to “a
surface-to-air missile [which] exploded near the left side of the
passenger plane bringing down the aircraft.”
Although
the Dutch
report concluded
that the Russian-made BUK surface-to-air missile with a 9N314M
warhead brought down the Boeing 777, it did not mention which side
was responsible for firing the missile… (International
Business Times,
March 8, 2016
The
evidence presented in this Global Research article (below) first
published on July 31, 2014 contradicts the report of the
Dutch Safety Board and provides evidence:
The
evidence amply confirms that Malaysian Airlines MH17 was not brought
down by a surface to air missile. It was brought down by military
aircraft.
The
West continues to accuse Russia and the Donbass separatists of having
brought down the plane with a surface to air missile. IT’S A LIE.
The Dutch investigation has been twisted.
UPDATE,
August 7, 2016
Washington’s
agenda in liaison with the Kiev regimes is to blame Russia. In recent
developments (August 3, 2016), Ukraine president Poroshenko has
visited Malaysia for discussions with Prime Minister Razak Najib:
“Prime
Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak said Malaysia will work with Ukraine
to bring the perpetrators to justice. “We will do whatever we can
to find the truth for the sake of families who lost their loved ones
in this tragic incident. “We are waiting for the criminal
investigation report, which is expected to be tabled by the year-end,
followed by a meeting to decide on the next course of action,” said
Najib.(New
Straights Times,
August 4, 2016)
The
evidence available in September 2014 –including a BBC report which
the BBC decided to suppress– refutes the official story.
As
we recall, the alleged role of Russia in bringing down the plane was
used as a justification to implement the economic sanctions regime
against Moscow. Although not explicitly mentioned by the Dutch
investigators, Moscow remains the “main suspect” in this twisted
and fraudulent investigation, which will no doubt be the object of a
new gush of media lies and distortions. Moscow has expressed its
disagreement.
“They
are fundamentally wrong, the lack of logic there is beyond
comparison… I had a feeling that the commission was cherry-picking
the evidence to suit a theory they had chosen.” Deputy head of
Russia’s federal air transport agency Oleg Storchevoi (quoted
by the
Associated Press
Meanwhile,
the Dutch investigators have decided to temporarily
withhold their final verdict:
“it
soon should determine the exact launch site of the missile that
brought down the plane, killing all 298 people on board.
But Fred Westerbeke, the
prosecutor leading the international probe, warned Monday that
completing the investigation would take much longer. He declined to
name a possible finishing date.
After
briefing relatives of victims on the investigation, Westerbeke
pledged to complete the investigation “as quickly as possible, if
only because of the frustration among the families.” (AP,
March 7, 2016)
Since
July 2014, Global Research has compiled evidence and analysis which
refutes the official story.
Our
message to the families: The Dutch investigators are lying.
Numerous
authors and specialists have contributed to the MH17 dossier, which
is available on the Global Research website. Unequivocally this
dossier refutes the official story.
“SUPPORT
MH17 TRUTH”: OSCE MONITORS IDENTIFY “SHRAPNEL AND MACHINE
GUN-LIKE HOLES” INDICATING SHELLING. NO EVIDENCE OF A MISSILE
ATTACK. SHOT DOWN BY A MILITARY AIRCRAFT
by Michel Chossudovsky
Global
Research
July
31, 2014
According
to the report of German pilot and airlines expert Peter Haisenko, the
MH17 Boeing 777 was not brought down by a missile.
What
he observed from the available photos were perforations of the
cockpit:
This aircraft was not hit
by a missile in the central portion. The destruction is limited to
the cockpit area. Now you have to factor in that this part is
constructed of specially reinforced material
The
OSCE Mission
It
is worth noting that the initial statements by OSCE (OVSE, AP) observers (July
31) broadly confirm the findings of Peter Haisenko:
Monitors
from the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe reported
that shrapnel-like
holes were found in two separate pieces of the fuselage of
the ill-fated Malaysia
Airlines aircraft
that was
believed to have been downed by a missile in eastern Ukraine.
Michael
Bociurkiw of the OSCE group of monitors at his daily briefing
described part of the plane’s fuselage dotted with “shrapnel-like,
almost machine gun-like holes.” He
said the damage was inspected by Malaysian aviation-security
officials .(Wall
Street Journal,
July 31, 2014)
The
monitoring OSCE team has not found evidence of a missile fired from
the ground as conveyed by official White House statements. As we
recall, the US ambassador to the UN Samantha Power stated –pointing
a finger at Russia– that the Malaysian MH17 plane was “likely
downed by a surface-to-air missile operated from a separatist-held
location”:
The
team of international investigators with the Organisation for
Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE) are
uncertain if the missile used was fired from the ground as US
military experts have previously suggested, the
Wall Street Journal (WSJ) reported. (Malay
Mail online, emphasis
added)
The
initial OSCE findings tend to dispel the claim that a BUK missile
system brought down the plane.
Evidently,
inasmuch as the perforations are attributable to shelling, a shelling
operation conducted from the ground could not have brought down an
aircraft traveling above 30,000 feet.
Ukraine
Su-25 military aircraft within proximity of MH17
Peter
Haisenko’s study is corroborated by the Russian Ministry of Defense
which pointed to a Ukrainian Su-25 jet in the flight corridor of the
MH17, within proximity of the plane.
All
the eyewitnesses interviewed by the BBC confirmed the presence
of a Ukrainian military aircraft flying within proximity of Malaysian
Airlines MH17 at the time that it was shot down:
Eyewitness
#1:
There were two explosions in the air. And this is how it broke apart.
And [the fragments] blew apart like this, to the sides. And when …
Eyewitness
#2:
… And there was another aircraft, a military one, beside it.
Everybody saw it.
Eyewitness
#1:
Yes, yes. It was flying under it, because it could be seen. It was
proceeding underneath, below the civilian one.
Eyewitness
#3:
There were sounds of an explosion. But they were in the sky. They
came from the sky. Then this plane made a sharp turn-around like
this. It changed its trajectory and headed in that direction
[indicating the direction with her hands].
BBC Report below
The
original BBC Video Report published by BBC Russian Service on July
23, 2014 has since been removed from the BBC archive.
In
a bitter irony, The BBC is censoring its own news productions.
This
is the BBC Report, still available on Youtube
It
has now been blocked [March 8, 2016] once more by the BBC. It is
called suppressing the evidence.
BELOW
SCREENSHOT OF BC TV REPORT ENTITLED “AND THERE WAS ANOTHER
AIRCRAFT” SUPPRESSED BY THE BBC
Media
Spin
The
media has reported that a surface to air missile was indeed fired and
exploded before reaching its target. It was not the missile
that brought down the plane, it was the shrapnel resulting from the
missile explosion (prior to reaching the plane) which punctured the
plane and then led to a loss of pressure.
According
to Ukraine’s National security spokesman Andriy Lysenko in a
contradictory statement, the MH17 aircraft “suffered
massive explosive decompression after being hit by a shrapnel
missile.”
(See IBT,
Australia)
The downed Malaysia
Airlines jet in eastern Ukraine suffered an explosive loss of
pressure after
it was punctured by shrapnel from a missile.
They
say the information came from the plane’s flight data recorders,
which are being analysed by British experts.
However,
it remains unclear who fired a missile, with pro-Russia rebels and
Ukraine blaming each other.
Many
of the 298 people killed on board flight MH17 were from the
Netherlands.
Dutch
investigators leading the inquiry into the crash have refused to
comment on the Ukrainian claims.
“Machine
Gun Like Holes”
The
shrapnel marks should be distinguished from the small entry and exit
holes “most likely that of a 30 millimeter caliber projectile”
fired from a military aircraft. These holes could not have been
caused by a missile explosion as hinted by the MSM.
While
the MSN is saying that the “shrapnel like holes” can be caused
by a missile (see BBC report above), the OSCE has confirmed the
existence of what it describes as “machine
gun like holes”, without however acknowledging that these cannot
be caused by a missile.
In
this regard, the GSh-302 firing gun operated by an Su-25 is able to
fire 3000 rpm which explains the numerous entry and exit holes.
If
we now consider the armament of a typical SU 25 we learn this: It
is equipped with a double-barreled 30-mm gun, type GSh-302 / AO-17A,
equipped with: a 250 round magazine of anti-tank incendiary shells
and splinter-explosive shells (dum-dum), arranged in alternating
order. The cockpit of the MH 017 has evidently been fired at from
both sides: the
entry and exit holes are found on the same fragment of it’s
cockpit segment (op cit)
The
accusations directed against Russia including the sanctions regime
imposed by Washington are based on a lie.
The
evidence does not support the official US narrative to the effect
that the MH17 was shot down by a BUK missile system operated by the
DPR militia.
Overigens wordt in dit bericht niet gesproken over een verdwenen autopsie rapport, een rapport over één van de piloten, die bijna letterlijk in tweeën werd geschoten met munitie, die alleen in MIG straaljagers wordt gebruikt………
Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.
:quality(50)/cdn-kiosk-api.telegraaf.nl/26c109d4-5f3c-11e8-be41-e98a884c88fb.jpg)
