9/11: geen media aandacht voor de kalmte tijdens de chaos

Brasscheck TV heeft eerder al gewezen op de rustige manier waarop veel mensen met elkaar omgingen na de aanslagen op de Twin Towers op 11 september 2001. Zoals de burgers die met een vloot aan bootjes mensen van Manhattan haalden, niet gepland maar spontaan door deze burgers in gang gezet. 

Hetzelfde moet je concluderen als je bedenkt dat 90% van de mensen aanwezig in de torens deze hebben weten te ontsnappen, met grote paniek die de reguliere media suggereerden was dit onmogelijk geweest. Daarover gesproken: nog steeds wordt deze suggestie volgehouden en men heeft in die media geen belang bij kalmte onder de mensen die uit die torens wisten te komen, niet zo vreemd als je bedenkt dat men in de reguliere westerse media uit is op zoveel mogelijk sensatie en nee die sensatie ontbreekt als je ziet hoe kalm een groot aantal mensen hebben gereageerd en elkaar hebben geholpen en bijvoorbeeld niet hebben gevochten om de torens uit te komen….

Professor Kathleen Tierney, leider van Disaster Research Center van de University
of Delaware
deed onderzoek naar deze zaak en komt tot heel andere conclusies dan de reguliere media waar je dergelijke conclusies niet kan vinden, ze heeft e.e.a. gerapporteerd op de jaarlijkse bijeenkomst van de American Sociological Association (ASA).

Bemoedigend te zien dat de mens in basis toch vooral een sociaal wezen is dat niet alleen voor zichzelf, het gezin, familie, vrienden, bekenden en buren zorgt, maar ook voor totaal vreemden (dat was overigens ook te zien bij de overstromingen eerder dit jaar in Duitsland). Daarentegen is het triest te zien dat de overheid dit soort zaken steeds meer van bovenaf wil organiseren en dat welhaast op militaire manier, alsof we dat nodig hebben in situaties waarbij men paniek verwacht, ook al laat het verleden zien dat dit meestal niet het geval is, daarmee lopen zelfs spontane acties van burgers gevaar de kop te worden ingedrukt……. Je zou zelfs kunnen stellen dat men daarmee juist paniek uitlokt…… Wellicht was dat laatste ook de bedoeling in geval van 9/11, dit door haat en angst te zaaien tegen/voor de daders en daarmee de weg vrij te maken voor oorlog zoals na die aanslagen gebeurde, waar het gemanipuleerde volk zich vervolgens voor het grootste deel achter heeft geschaard…….

Media ignored 9/11calm amid chaos

The story you were never told

 

Original video produced by BrasscheckTV.com and narrated by Goodman Green

Click here to support Brasscheck

Script by Andrew Greeley

Reprinted by special permission

On Sept. 11 last year, up to 1 million people were evacuated from
Lower Manhattan by water “in an emergent network of private and publicly
owned watercraft–a previously unplanned activity.” It was an American
Dunkirk, as the epic rescue of the British army at Dunkirk in 1940 by an
armada of a similar craft.

Yet you most likely never saw this astonishing event, reported last
month by Professor Kathleen Tierney at the annual meeting of the
American Sociological Association (ASA), on television and never read about it
in the print media. It would have made for spectacular TV imagery; yet,
as an example of calm and sensible and spontaneous action, it did not
fit the media image of panic, an image that will doubtless be re-enacted
next week.

Tierney, director of the Disaster Research Center at the University
of Delaware, argued that the reaction of people at the World Trade
Center was what one might have expected from the research literature of
the last 50 years on behavior in disaster situations. ”Social bonds
remained intact and the sense of responsibility to others–family
members, friends, fellow workers, neighbors, and even total strangers
remains strong. . . . People sought information from one another, made
inquiries and spoke with loved ones via cell phones, engaged in
collective decision-making and helped one another to safety. When the
towers were evacuated, the evacuation was carried out in a calm and
orderly manner.”

There is growing research literature that Tierney cites that leaves
little doubt about this description. (See also Lee Clarke’s article in
the current issue of the new sociological journal Contexts.) Many will
not believe that the scenario could possibly be true. Doesn’t everyone
know that there is panic in disaster situations? Don’t people become
frightened, selfish, and flee in headlong panic?

The answer is no, they don’t. The proof that this was not true on
Sept. 11 is to be found in the fact that 90 percent of the people in the
World Trade Center (WTC) escaped–which would have been impossible had people
panicked. Most people are cool under such pressure. Their old social
networks do not dissolve, and new social networks emerge. The paradigm
of humankind as a mob simply isn’t true. We are social animals, and even
when terribly frightened we remain social animals.

Note that most of the positive social behavior that saved so many
lives was not organized by any formal agency, much less by any
command-and-control mechanism. People saved themselves. Other people
converged from all over the city to help. As Tierney says, “The response
to the Sept. 11 tragedy was so effective precisely because it was not
centrally directed and controlled. Instead, it was flexible, adaptive
and focused on handling problems as they emerged.”

In some sense, Sept. 11 was a victory over the terrorists. Socially
responsible free Americans prevented the loss from being much worse.
Yet, the response of the planning agencies has been to establish more
and more elaborate command-and-control structures, which will force a
population that is not about to panic into panic behavior.

Says Tierney: “When Sept. 11 demonstrated the enormous resilience in
our civil society, why is disaster response now being characterized in
militaristic terms?” Perhaps because those who are determined to control
everything don’t understand that even in military situations, it’s the
second lieutenants and the sergeants who win battles, as, for example,
in the Omaha Beach chaos at Normandy.

Generals sitting in faraway bunkers cannot control battles. Neither
can bureaucrats be far from the scene of the tragedy, no matter how
elaborate their plans are.

The media got the story all wrong because the panic paradigm is still
pervasive and because no one in the media had read the
disaster-research literature. They thus reinforced the propensity of
those running the country not to trust the good sense and social concern
of ordinary folk. Rather, they want to control everything with such
ditsy ideas as the proposed Homeland Security Department (DHS). That plan
would take union and civil service protections away from government
workers and accomplish little else.

You can count on it: In the orgy of self-pity in which the media will
engage next week, no one will pay any attention to why there was no
panic in the evacuation, much less to the American Dunkirk at the lower
end of Manhattan. Nor will anyone argue that the only kind of formal
plan that will work in similar situations is one that is sensitive to
and ready to integrate with the powerful social propensity of the human
species.

====================================

Zie ook: ‘9/11: de reden voor twintig jaar westerse terreur o.l.v. de VS waarbij meer dan vijf miljoen mensen werden vermoord‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)

De VS wordt aangevallen door landen die het haat op een manier die alleen de CIA ‘kan zien’‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht!!)

Samenzweringstheorie paniek wordt juist gevoed door ‘tegenstanders’ daarvan

Voor meer berichten over 911, senatie tv, sensatie radio en de zogenaamd onafhankelijke journalistiek, klik op het desbetreffende label direct onder dit bericht.

On
the right hand side of this page you can choose for a translation in
the language of your choice, first choose ‘Engels’ (English) so
you can recognise your own language (the Google tranlation is first
in Dutch, a language most people can’t read, while most people
recognize there language translated in English).

9/11 werd mede georganiseerd door Israël

De aanslagen van 9/11 (2001) werden niet door Al Qaida georganiseerd, iedereen die de officiële lezing nog steeds gelooft kan hiervan overtuigd worden mits deze enige tijd steekt in het lezen van rapporten en onderzoeken door
onafhankelijke organisaties, of door verklaringen van deskundigen, politeagenten en brandweermensen >> deze
aanslagen werden minstens gepleegd met medeweten en organisatie van
de federale overheid van de VS…….

Lauren
Guyénot schreef een artikel voor The Unz Review, dat door mij werd
overgenomen van Information Clearing House (ICH). Hierin betoogt hij dat
Israël de grote dader is achter de 9/11 aanslagen in 2001, uiteraard
met de toevoeging dat e.e.a niet mogelijk was zonder de hulp van de
VS overheid…..

Eén van de grootste bewijzen dat hier enorm is gelogen is wel het feit dat de vliegtuigen onmogelijk het instorten van de WTC torens konden hebben veroorzaakt…… Over die vliegtuigen gesproken: het was destijds onmogelijk om boven de stad te vliegen zonder dat de luchtmacht in zou grijpen en oh toevel die dag waren er geen straaljagers paraat om in te grijpen, daarnaast stellen ervaren piloten dat het bijzxonder moeilijk is om met een verkeersvliegtuig zo precies de toren in te vliegen (de piloten zoude de daders zijn geweest die trainig hadden gekregen in kleine vliegtuigen, maar die niet eens wisten hoe te moeten landen…)

Moet
wel opmerken dat Gyénot vooral Israël ziet als het land dat het
meest heeft geprofiteerd van deze aanslag, echter daar ben ik het
niet mee eens, immers de werkelijke grote profiteur van deze
aanslagen is de VS zelf en daarmee bedoel ik ook het Pentagon en de
rest van het militair-industrieel complex. De oorlog tegen terreur
deed de kassa’s van de wapenindustrie hard rinkelen, terwijl
het instorten van de Sovjet-Unie er op z’n zachts gezegd voor zorgde dat de winsten
van die industrie in de tien voorgaande jaren onder druk stonden…. Als gevolg van 9/11 kreeg het Pentagon er fiks wat geld bij, terwijl de geheime diensten (meer dan 25 in de VS!!) extra geld en bevoegdheden kregen…….

Bovendien was oorlog voeren, het ultieme
gevolg van die aanslagen (zoals de illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan
en Irak), ook een garantie voor extra geld in de kluizen van de
oliemaatschappijen (immers de koersen van oliemaatscfhappijen gaan dan omhoog), die daarnaast zelfs toestemming kregen voor het
winnen van olie op niet eerder geziene plekken (en dan bedoel ik niet alleen in Irak), gevolgd door de
peperdure en milieu-verrampenerende schaliegas, en -oliewinning)…. 

George W. Bush, destijds president,
stond in de peilingen over zijn populariteit lager dan
in vele decennia was gezien bij een zittende president, 9/11, de oorlog tegen terreur en de illegale oorlog tegen Afghanistan zorgden ervoor dat zijn populariteit als een speer de lucht inging……

Voorts verdween op 11 september 2001 een fiks deel van de VS
overheidsschuld, daar bepaalde servers in het WTC werden
vernietigd….. Dit nog naast het verdwijnen van een flinke voorraad goud…… Me dunkt alles bij elkaar fikse belangen voor de VS
zelf……

Al is het wel zo dat naast andere belangrijke figuren in Israël, ook Netanyahu blij was met de aanslag, daar de VS nu wist wat het betekende terreur op eigen grondgebioed te hebben (al had men daar al veel eerder meerdere terreuraanslagen), terwijl Israël al decennia te maken had met terreuraanslagen (vooral zelf uitgevoerd tegen het verdrukte Palestijnse volk…)…. Netanyahu stelde dan ook dat dit de banden tussen de twee landen verder zou versterken……. Het is wel zeker dat Israël, in de vorm van de Mossad, de geheime dienst van dat land, heeft meegeholpen aan de aanslagen…… Moet je nagaan: na de aanslagen beschuldigde men de Palestijnen er onterecht van feest te hebben gevierd n.a.v. die aanslagen….. (in New York werden 5 Joodse Israëliërs betrapt die feestvierden terwijl ze aan de overkant van een rivier de rokende puinhopen bekeken van de Twin Towers….)

Bij de aanslagen op het
WTC zouden 3.000 mensen zijn omgekomen, echter in de ‘war on terror’ die
de Bush administratie daarna ontketende zijn minstens 2 miljoen mensen
omgekomen en hebben de grote wapenfabrikanten en die van vliegend-,
varend- en rollend oorlogstuig zich helemaal scheel verdiend…… Dit
nog naast de zoals gezegd enorme budgetverhogingen voor leger en geheime diensten,
waar de laatsten ook nog eens veel meer bevoegdheden kregen, o.a.
middels de Patriot Act, die nu weer in het nieuws is daar een federale
rechter heeft bepaald dat het bespioneren van VS burgers illegaal is, dit bespioneren werd geopenbaard
door Edward Snowden in 2013…..*

Kritiek en weerlegging van de leugens over de aanslagen van 9/11 worden gezien als een complottheorieën, echter het echte complot is juist het neerhalen van de torens** middels deze ‘aanslagen’ en de aanslag op het Pentagon waarvan het vliegtuig niet werd gevonden…. Een ander vliegtuig dat gekaapt was, zou elders in een natuurgebied zijn neergestort, maar ook daarvan werd geen spoor gevonden…….
 

Lees het uitgebreide artikel van Guyénot, het is meer dan de moeite
waard en geeft ten overvloede nog eens aan dat 9/11 een false flag
operatie was ten dienste van wat mij betreft vooral de VS!! (vergeet
niet dat Osama bin Laden bij herhaling stelde dat Al Qaida niet
betrokken was bij deze aanslagen, terwijl terreurgroepen als Al Qaida
maar al te graag de verantwoording opeisen van geslaagde aanslagen,
zelfs als ze er niets mee te maken hebben….. Niet voor niets werd
Osama bin Laden onmiddellijk vermoord door speciale VS (terreur) commando’s toen men hem aantrof in Pakistan, het was uiteraard
niet de bedoeling dat bin Laden uit de school zou klappen tijdens een proces….

9/11
Was an Israeli Job
How
America was neoconned into World War IV
By
Laurent Guyénot

 

Technical
impossibilities

September
13, 2020 “
Information
Clearing House

–  Thanks to courageous investigators, many anomalies in the
official explanation of the events of 9/11 were posted on the
Internet in the following months, providing evidence that this was a
false flag operation, and that Osama bin Laden was innocent, as he
repeatedly declared in the Afghan and Pakistani press and on Al
Jazeera.[1] The proofs of this appalling fraud have been accumulating
ever since, and are now accessible to anyone willing to spend a few
hours of research on the Web. (Although, while preparing this
article, I noticed that Google is now making access to that research
more difficult than it was five years ago, artificially prioritizing
anti-conspiracy sites.)

For
example, members of Architects
and Engineers for 9/11 Truth
have demonstrated that it was
impossible for plane crashes and jet fuel fires to trigger the
collapse of the Twin Towers. Even Donald
Trump understood this
. In fact, speaking of “collapse” is
perhaps misleading: the towers literally exploded, pulverizing
concrete and projecting pieces of steel beams weighing several
hundred tons hundreds of meters laterally at high speeds. The
pyroclastic
dust
that immediately flooded through the streets, not unlike the
dust from a volcano, indicates a high temperature mixture of hot
gasses and relatively dense solid particles, an impossible phenomenon
in a simple collapse. It is also impossible that WTC7,
another skyscraper (47 stories), which had not been hit by a plane,
collapsed into its own footprint at near free-fall speed, unless by
“controlled demolition.”

Testimonies
of firefighters
recorded shortly after the events describe
sequences of explosions just before the “collapse”, well below
the plane impact. The presence of molten metal in the wreckage up to
three weeks after the attack is inexplicable except by the presence
of incompletely burned explosives. Firefighter Philip Ruvolo
testified before Étienne Sauret’s camera for his film
Collateral
Damages

(2011): “You’d get down below and you’d see molten steel—molten
steel running down the channelways, like you were in a foundry—like
lava.”

Aviation
professionals
have also reported impossibilities in the behavior
of the planes. The charted speeds of the two aircraft hitting the
Twin Towers, 443 mph and 542 mph, exclude these aircraft being Boeing
767s, because these speeds are virtually impossible near ground
level. In the unlikely event such speeds could be attained without
the aircraft falling apart, flying them accurately into the towers
was mission impossible, especially by the amateur pilots blamed for
the hijacking. Hosni
Mubarak, a former pilot, said he could never do it
. (He is not
the only head of state to have voiced his doubts: Chavez
and Ahmadinejad
are among them.) Recall that neither of the black boxes of the
jetliners was ever found, an incomprehensible situation.

And
of course, there are the obvious anomalies of Shanksville and
Pentagon crash sites: no plane or credible plane debris can be seen
on any of the numerous photos easily available.

Inside
Job or Mossad Job?

Among
the growing number of Americans who disbelieve the official version
of the 9/11 attacks, two basic theories are in competition: I called
them “inside job” and “Mossad job”. 

The first one is the
dominant thesis within the so-called 9/11 Truth movement, and blames
the American government, or a faction within the American Deep State.
The second one claims that the masterminds were members of a powerful
Israeli network deeply infiltrated in all spheres of power within the
US, including media, government, military and secret services.

This
“Mossad job” thesis has been gaining ground since Alan Sabrosky,
a professor at the U.S. Army War College and the U.S. Military
Academy, published in July 2012 an
article entitled “Demystifying 9/11: Israel and the Tactics of
Mistake”
, where he voiced his 

conviction that September 11th
was “a classic Mossad-orchestrated operation.”

We
can notice from the outset that incriminating Israelis or Arabs are
both “outside job” theories (in fact, they are mirror images of
each other, which is understandable in light of what Gilad Atzmon
explains about Jewish “projected guilt”).[2] Before even looking
at the evidence, “outside job” sounds more credible that “inside
job”. There is something monstrous in the idea that a government
can deceive and terrorize its own citizens by killing thousands of
them, just for starting a series of wars that are not even in the
nation’s interest. By comparison, a foreign power attacking the
U.S. under the false flag of a third power almost seems like fair
play. Indeed suspicion of Israel’s role should be natural to anyone
aware of the reputation of the Mossad as: “Wildcard. Ruthless and
cunning. Has capability to target U.S. forces and make it look like a
Palestinian/Arab act,” in the words of a report of the U.S. Army
School for Advanced Military Studies quoted
by the
Washington
Times
,
September 10
th,
2001
— the day before the attacks.

This
is an important point, because it raises the question of how and why
the 9/11 Truth movement has been led to endorse massively the
outrageous “inside job” thesis without even considering the more
likely thesis of an attack by a foreign power acting under an Islamic
false flag—and what foreign power but Israel would do that?

Of
course, the two dissenting theses do not necessarily exclude each
other; at least, no one incriminating Israel denies that corrupted
elements from the American administration or deep state were
involved. The “passionate
attachment”
between Israel and the U.S. has been going on for
decades, and 9/11 is one of its monstruous offsprings.

I
can think of no better symbol of that reality than the marriage of
Ted and Barbara
Olson
. Ted Oslon, after having defended Bush in the disputed 2000
election, had been rewarded with the post of Solicitor General (he
also defended Dick Cheney when he refused to submit to Congress
Enron-related documents). Barbara was a famous CNN reporter, but
before that, she was born Barbara Kay Bracher of Jewish parents,
educated at Yeshiva University School of Law, and hired by the legal
firm WilmerHale, of which Jamie Gorelick, a future member of the 9/11
Commission, was also a member, and whose clients include powerful
Israeli firms like Amdocs, a digital communication company charged
with spying for
Israel in the United States
. On September 11, 2001, Barbara Olson
alledgedly was on flight AA77, from which she made two telephone
calls to her husband. Her calls were reported on CNN in the
afternoon, and contributed to crystallize some details of the
official story, such as the “box cutters” used as only weapons by
the hijackers. Repeatedly invited on television shows after 9/11, Ted
Olson frequently contradicted himself when questioned about the calls
from his wife. In a 2006 report, the FBI identified only one call
from Barbara Olson, and it was an unconnected call lasting 0 seconds.
Like all other reported phone calls from desperate passengers
(including the famous “Hi, Mom. This is Mark Bingham”), Barbara’s
call was simply impossible, because the technology required to make
high-altitude phone calls was not developed until 2004.[3]

9/11
was made possible by an alliance between secret worshippers of Israel
and corrupted American elements. The question is: who, of the two,
were the masterminds of this incredibly daring and complex operation,
and for what “higher purpose”?

Another
question is: why do those who keep repeating as a mantra “9/11
was an inside job”
ignore totally the compelling evidence
pointing to Israel? In other words, to what extent do they constitute
a “controlled opposition” intended to cover up for Israel? Asking
this type of question does not mean suspecting anyone who defends an
erroneous or incomplete theory of being a hypocrite. Most people
defending one theory or the other do so sincerely, based on the
information to which they have access. I have myself been a believer
in the official theory for 7 years, and in the “inside job”
theory for 2 years, before progressively moving on to the present
argument from 2010. On the other hand, we can assume that those who
lead the public into error on a long term are not just mistaken but
lying. In any case, it is legitimate to investigate the background of
opinion makers, and when they are caught lying or distorting the
truth, we can speculate on their motivation. I will come back to this
issue at the end of the article.

The
dancing Israelis

Researchers
who believe Israel orchestrated 9/11 cite the behavior of a group of
individuals who have come to be known as the “dancing Israelis”
since their arrest, though their aim was to pass as “dancing
Arabs.” Dressed in ostensibly “Middle Eastern” attire, they
were seen by various witnesses standing on the roof of a van parked
in Jersey City, cheering and taking photos of each other with the WTC
in the background, at the very moment the first plane hit the North
Tower. The suspects then moved their van to another parking spot in
Jersey City, where other witnesses saw them deliver the same
ostentatious celebrations.

One
anonymous call to the police in Jersey City, reported the same day by
NBC News, mentioned “a white van, 2 or 3 guys in there. They
look like Palestinians and going around a building. […] I see the
guy by Newark Airport mixing some junk and he has those sheikh
uniforms. […] He’s dressed like an Arab.” The police soon
issued the following BOLO alert (be-on-the-look-out) for a “Vehicle
possibly related to New York terrorist attack. White, 2000 Chevrolet
van with New Jersey registration with ‘Urban Moving Systems’ sign
on back seen at Liberty State Park, Jersey City, NJ, at the time of
first impact of jetliner into World Trade Center. Three individuals
with van were seen celebrating after initial impact and subsequent
explosion.”

By
chance, the van was intercepted around 4 pm, with five young men
inside: Sivan and Paul Kurzberg, Yaron Shmuel, Oded Ellner, and Omer
Marmari. Before any question was asked, the driver, Sivan Kurzberg,
burst out: “We are Israelis. We are not your problem. Your problems
are our problems. The Palestinians are your problem”.The Kurzberg
brothers were formally identified as Mossad agents. All five
officially worked for a moving company (a classic cover for
espionage) named Urban Moving Systems, whose owner, Dominik Otto
Suter, fled the country for Tel Aviv on September 14.[4]

This
event was first reported the day after the attacks by journalist
Paulo
Lima in the New Jersey newspaper
The
Bergen Record
,
based on “sources close to the investigation” who were convinced
of the suspects’ foreknowledge of the morning’s attacks: “It
looked like they knew what was going to happen when they were at
Liberty State Park”.The 579-page FBI
report on the investigation
that followed (partially declassified
in 2005) reveals several important facts. First, once developed, the
photos taken by the suspects while watching the North Tower on fire
confirm their attitudes of celebration: “They smiled, they hugged
each other and they appeared to ‘high five’ one another”. To
explain their contentment, the suspects said they were simply happy
that, thanks to these terrorist attacks, “the United States will
take steps to stop terrorism in the world”. Yet at this point,
before the second tower was hit, most Americans believed the crash
was an accident. The five Israelis were found connected to another
company called Classic International Movers, which employed five
other Israelis arrested for their contacts with the nineteen presumed
suicide hijackers. In addition, one of the five suspects had called
“an individual in South America with authentic ties to Islamic
militants in the middle east”. Finally, the FBI report states that
the “The vehicle was also searched by a trained bomb-sniffing dog
which yielded a positive result for the presence of explosive
traces”.

After
all this incriminating evidence comes the most puzzling passage of
the report: its conclusion that “the FBI no longer has any
investigative interests in the detainees and they should proceed with
the appropriate immigration proceedings”. In fact, a letter
addressed to the U.S. Immigration and Naturalization Service, dated
September 25, 2001, proves that, less than two weeks after the
events, the FBI federal headquarter had already decided to close the
investigation, asking that “The U.S. Immigration and Naturalization
Service should proceed with the appropriate immigration proceedings”.
The five “dancing Israelis”, also known as “the high fivers”
,
were detained 71 days in a Brooklyn prison, where they first refused,
then failed, lie detector tests. Finally, they were quietly returned
to Israel under the minimal charge of “visa violation.” Three of
them were then invited on an Israeli TV talk show in November 2001,
where one of them ingenuously declared: “Our
purpose was simply to document the event.”

The
Israeli spy network

The
five “dancing Israelis,” the only suspects arrested on the very
day of the 9/11 attacks, were just the tip of an iceberg. In
September 2001, the federal police were busy dismantling the largest
Israeli spy network ever uncovered on American soil. In the summer
preceding the attack, the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) compiled a
report which would be revealed to the public by the
Washington
Post
on
November 23
rd,
2001, followed by a Carl
Cameron’s four-part documentary broadcast on Fox News
from
December 11
th,
2001. On March 14
th,
2002, an article in French newspaper
Le
Monde

signed by Sylvain Cypel also referred to the report, shortly before
the French magazine
Intelligence
Online

made it fully
accessible on the Internet
.[5] It said that 140 Israeli spies,
aged between 20 and 30, had been arrested since March 2001, while 60
more were arrested after September 11. 

Generally posing as art
students, they visited at least “36 sensitive sites of the
Department of Defense.” “A majority of those questioned have
stated they served in military intelligence, electronic signal
intercept, or explosive ordnance units. Some have been linked to
high-ranking officials in the Israeli military. One was the son of a
two-star general, one served as the bodyguard to the head of the
Israeli Army, one served in a Patriot mission unit.” Another, Peer
Segalovitz, officer in the 605 Battalion of the Golan Heights,
“acknowledged he could blow up buildings, bridges, cars, and
anything else that he needed to.”[6]

Of
special interest is the mention that “the Hollywood, Florida, area
seems to be a central point for these individuals.”[7] More than 30
out of the 140 fake Israeli students identified before 9/11 lived in
that city of 140,000 inhabitants. And this city also happens to be
the place where fifteen of the nineteen alleged 9/11 Islamist
hijackers had regrouped (nine in Hollywood, six in the vicinity),
including four of the five supposed to have hijacked Flight AA11.
What was the relationship between the Israeli spies and the Islamist
terrorists? We were told by mainstream
news
that the former were monitoring the latter, but failed to
report suspicious activities of these terrorists to American
authorities. From such a presentation, Israel comes out clean, since
a spy agency cannot be blamed for not sharing information with the
country it is spying in. At worst, the Israeli Intelligence can be
accused of “letting it happen”—a guarantee of impunity. In
reality, the Israeli agents were certainly not just monitoring the
future “hijackers,” but financing and manipulating them, before
disposing of them. We know that Israeli Hanan Serfaty, who rented two
flats near Mohamed Atta, had handled at least $100,000 in three
months. And we also learned from the
New
York Times

on February 19, 2009
, that Ali al-Jarrah, cousin of the alleged
hijacker of Flight UA93 Ziad al-Jarrah, had spent twenty-five years
spying for the Mossad as an undercover agent infiltrating the
Palestinian resistance and Hezbollah.

Israeli
agents apparently appreciate operating under the cover of artists.
Shortly before September 11, a group of fourteen Jewish “artists”
under the name of Gelatin
installed themselves on the ninety-first floor of the north tower of
the World Trade Center. There, as a work of “street art,” they
removed a window and extended a wooden balcony. To understand what
role this piece of scaffolding may have played, it must be remembered
that the explosion supposedly resulting from the impact of the Boeing
AA11 on the North Tower took place between the ninety-second and the
ninety-eighth floors. With the only film of the impact on the North
Tower being that of the Naudet brothers, who are under suspicion for
numerous reasons, many researchers are convinced that no aircraft hit
this tower, and that the explosion simulating the impact was provoked
by pre-planted explosives inside the tower.

Floors
ninety-three to one hundred of the North Tower were occupied by Marsh
& McLennan, whose CEO was Jeffrey Greenberg, son of wealthy
Zionist (and financier of George W. Bush) Maurice Greenberg, who also
happens to be the owner of Kroll Inc., the firm in charge of security
for the entire World Trade Center complex on 9/11. The Greenbergs
were also the insurers of the Twin Towers and, on July 24, 2001, they
took the precaution of having the contract reinsured by competitors.
In November 2000, the board of directors of Marsh & McLennan was
joined by (Lewis) Paul Bremer, the chairman of the National
Commission on Terrorism, who, on September 11, 2001, two hours only
after the pulverization of the North Tower, would appear
on NBC to name bin Laden as prime suspect
, perfectly calm as 400
of his employees are missing (295 will finally be declared dead). “It
is the day that will change our lives,” he said. “It is the day
when the war that the terrorists declared on the US [. . .] has been
brought home to the US.” In 2003, Bremer would be appointed
administrator of the Coalition Provisional Authority in Iraq to level
the Iraqi state to the ground and oversee the theft of almost a
trillion dollars intended for its reconstruction.

The
super-sayanim

With
Goldberg and Bremer, we have reached the upper level of the
conspiracy, comprising a number of influential Jewish personalities,
working inside and outside the U.S. government — super-
sayanim,
so to speak. The most representative of those outside government is
Larry Silverstein, the real estate shark who, with his partner Frank
Lowy, leased the Twin Towers from New York City in the spring of
2001. The head of the New York Port Authority, who granted
Silverstein and Lowy the lease, was none other than Lewis Eisenberg,
another member of the United Jewish Appeal Federation and former
vice-president of AIPAC. It appeared that Silverstein had made a
disastrous deal, because the
Twin Towers had to be decontaminated for asbestos
. The
decontamination process had been indefinitely postponed since the
1980s because of its cost, estimated at nearly $1 billion in 1989. In
2001, the New York Port Authority had been all too happy to shift
responsibility to Silverstein.

Immediately
after acquiring the Twin Towers, Silverstein renegotiated the
insurance contracts to cover terrorist attacks, doubling the coverage
to $3.5 billion, and made sure he would retain the right to rebuild
after such an event. After the attacks, he took his insurers to court
in order to receive double compensation, claiming that the two planes
were two separate attacks. After a long legal battle, he
pocketed $4.5 billion
. Silverstein is a leading member of the
United Jewish Appeal Federation of Jewish Philanthropies of New York,
the biggest fundraiser for Israel (after the US government, which
pays about $3 billion per year in aid to Israel). Silverstein also
maintained “close ties with Netanyahu,” according to
Haaretz
(November
21, 2001)
: “The two have been on friendly terms since
Netanyahu’s stint as Israel’s ambassador to the United Nations.
For years they kept in close touch. Every Sunday afternoon, New York
time, Netanyahu would call Silverstein.” Besides being a powerful
man, Larry is a lucky man: as
he explained in this interview
, every morning of the week, he had
breakfast at the
Windows
on the World

on top of the North Tower, but on September 11th, he had an
appointment with his dermatologist.

Accomplices
to the 9/11 false flag attack with strong Israeli connections should
also be tracked at the other end of the trajectory of the planes
reported to have crashed into the Twin Towers. Flights AA11 and UA175
took off from Logan Airport in Boston, which subcontracted their
security to International Consultants on Targeted Security (ICTS),
a firm based in Israel and headed by Menachem Atzmon
, a treasurer
of the Likud. So did Newark Airport where flight UA93 reportedly took
off before crashing in Shanksville.

A
serious investigation would follow many other trails, such as the
Odigo instant messages received by employees at the WTC two hours
before the plane crashes, as reported by
Haaretz
on
September 27
th,
2001. The first plane hit the WTC at the precise time announced,
“almost
to the minute,”
admitted Alex Diamandis, vice-president of
Odigo, headquartered in Israel. Also disturbing is the behavior of
the American branch of
Zim
Israel Navigational,

a maritime shipping giant 48% owned by the Jewish state (occasionally
used as a cover for the Israeli secret services), which moved its
offices from the WTC, along with its 200 employees, September 4
th,
2001, one week before the attacks —“like an act of God, we
moved”
,
said
the CEO Shaul Cohen-Mintz when interviewed
by
USA
Today
,
November 17
th,
2001
.

But
of course, none of these trails were ever pursued. That is because
the most powerful conspirators were at the highest level of the
Justice Department. Michael Chertoff was head of the Criminal
Division of the Department of Justice in 2001, and responsible, among
many other things, for securing the release of the Israeli agents
arrested before and after 9/11, including the “dancing Israelis.”
In 2003, this son of a rabbi and of a Mossad pioneer would be
appointed Secretary of Homeland Security, in charge of
counter-terrorism on the American soil, which allowed him to control
dissenting citizens and restrain access to the evidence under the
pretext of Sensitive Security Information.

Another
chief of the cover-up was Philip Zelikow, the executive director of
the 9/11 presidential Commission established in November 2002.
Zelikow is a self-styled specialist in the art of making “public
myths” by “‘searing’ or ‘molding’ events [that] take on
‘transcendent’ importance and, therefore, retain their power even
as the experiencing generation passes from the scene” (Wikipedia).
In December 1998, he co-signed an article for
Foreign
Affairs

entitled “Catastrophic Terrorism,”
in which he speculated on
what would have happened if the 1993 WTC bombing (already attributed
to bin Laden) had been done with a nuclear bomb: “An act of
catastrophic terrorism that killed thousands or tens of thousands of
people and/or disrupted the necessities of life for hundreds of
thousands, or even millions, would be a watershed event in America’s
history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented for
peacetime and undermine Americans’ fundamental sense of security
within their own borders in a manner akin to the 1949 Soviet atomic
bomb test, or perhaps even worse. … Like Pearl Harbor, the
event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The
United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back
civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention
of suspects and use of deadly force.” This is the man who
controlled the governmental investigation on the 9/11 terror attacks.
Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, who nominally led the commission,
revealed in their book
Without
Precedent: The Inside Story of the 9/11 Commission
(2006),
that the commission “was set up to fail” from the beginning.
Zelikow, they claim, had already written a synopsis and a conclusion
for the final report before the first meeting. He controlled all the
working groups, prevented them from communicating with each other,
and gave them as sole mission to prove the official story; Team 1A,
for example, was tasked to “tell the story of Al-Qaeda’s most
successful operation—the 9/11 attacks.”

A
tight control of mainstream media is perhaps the most delicate aspect
of the whole operation. I will not delve into that aspect, for we all
know what to expect from the MSM. For a groundbreaking argument on
the extent to which 9/11 was psy-op orchestrated by MSM, I recommend
Ace
Baker’s 2012 documentary
9/11
The Great American Psy-Opera
,
chapters
6, 7 and 8.

Machiavellian
meta-Zionists

If
we move up to the very highest level of the conspiracy, we find
ourselves in Tel Aviv. The preparation for 9/11 coincided with the
coming to power of Benjamin Netanyahu in 1996, followed by Ehud Barak
in July 1999, and Ariel Sharon in March 2001, who brought back
Netanyahu as minister of Foreign Affairs in 2002 (with Netanyahu
again becoming prime minister in 2009). It must be noted that both
Netanyahu and Ehud Barak were temporarily out of the Israeli
government in September 2001, just like Ben-Gurion at the time of
Kennedy’s assassination (read
my article on JFK
). A few months before 9/11, Barak, a former
head of Israeli military intelligence, was “recruited” as a
consultant to a Mossad front company, SCP Partner, specializing in
security and located less than seven miles from Urban Moving
Systems.[8] One hour after the explosion of the North Tower, Barak
was on BBC World
to point the finger at bin Laden (the first to
do so), and concluded: “It’s a time to launch an operational,
complete war against terror.”

As
for Netanyahu, we are not surprised to hear him boast, on CNN
in 2006
, of having predicted in 1995 that, “if the West doesn’t
wake up to the suicidal nature of militant Islam, the next thing you
will see is militant Islam bringing down the World Trade Center.”
Netanyahu is exemplary of the ever closer “special relationship”
between the US and Israel, which started with Truman and blossomed
under Johnson. Netanyahu had lived, studied, and worked in the United
States from 1960 to 1978, between his 11
th
and his 27
th
year—except during his military service—and again after the age
of 33, when he was appointed deputy ambassador to Washington and then
permanent delegate to the United Nations. Netanyahu appeared
regularly on CNN in the early 1990s, contributing to the
transformation of the world’s leading news channel into a major
Zionist propaganda tool. His political destiny was largely planned
and shaped in the United States, under the supervision of those we
now call neoconservatives, and the only thing that distinguishes him
from them is that, for public relations reasons, he does not possess
American nationality.

What’s
a neocon?” once asked Bush 43 to his father Bush 41, after more
than three years in the White House. “Do you want names, or a
description?” answered 41. “Description.” 

“Well,” said 41,
“I’ll give it to you in one word: Israel.”[9] That anecdote,
quoted by Andrew Cockburn, sums it up. The neoconservative movement
was born in the editorial office of the monthly magazine
Commentary,
which had replaced the
Contemporary
Jewish Record

in 1945 as the press organ of the American Jewish Committee. “If
there is an intellectual movement in America to whose invention Jews
can lay sole claim, neoconservatism is it,” wrote Gal
Beckerman in the
Jewish
Daily Forward
,
January
6, 2006. “It is a fact that as a political philosophy,
neoconservatism was born among the children of Jewish immigrants and
is now largely the intellectual domain of those immigrants’
grandchildren.”

The
founding fathers of neoconservatism (Norman Podhoretz, Irving
Kristol, Donald Kagan, Paul Wolfowitz, Adam Shulsky) were
self-proclaimed disciples of Leo Strauss, a German Jewish immigrant
teaching at the University of Chicago. Strauss can be characterized
as a meta-Zionist in the sense that, while an ardent supporter of the
State of Israel, he rejected the idea that Israel as a nation should
be contained within borders; Israel must retain her specificity,
which is to be everywhere, he said in essence in his 1962 lecture
“Why
We Remain Jews.”
Strauss would also approve of being called a
Machiavellian, for in his
Thoughts
on Machiavelli
,
he
praised the “the intrepidity of his thought, the grandeur of his
vision, and the graceful subtlety of his speech” (p. 13).
Machiavelli’s model of a prince was Cesar Borgia, the tyrant who
after having appointed the cruel Ramiro d’Orco to subdue the
province of Romania, had him executed with utter cruelty, thus
reaping the people’s gratitude after having diverted their hatred
onto another. Machiavelli, writes Strauss, “is a patriot of a
particular kind: He is more concerned with the salvation of his
fatherland than with the salvation of his soul” (p. 10). And that
happens to be exactly what Jewishness is all about, according to
Jewish thinkers such as Harry Waton: “The Jews that have a deeper
understanding of Judaism know that the only immortality there is for
the Jew is the immortality in the Jewish people” (read
more here
). As a matter of fact, in the
Jewish
World Review

of June 7, 1999
, Michael Ledeen, a neocon and founding member of
the
Jewish
Institute for National Security Affairs

(JINSA), assumed that Machiavelli must have been a “secret Jew,”
since “if you listen to his political philosophy you will hear
Jewish music.”

The
neoconservatives of the first generation originally positioned
themselves on the far left. Irving Kristol, one of the main editors
of Commentary, had long claimed to be a Trotskyist. It was
soon after the 1967 successful annexation of Arab territories by
Israel that the Straussians experienced their conversion to
right-wing militarism, to which they owe their new name. Norman
Podhoretz, editor-in-chief from 1960 to 1995, turned from anti-war
activist to defense budget booster in the early 70s. He gave the
following explanation in 1979: “American support for Israel
depended upon continued American involvement in international
affairs—from which it followed that an American withdrawal into the
kind of isolationist mood [. . .] that now looked as though it might
soon prevail again, represented a direct threat to the security of
Israel.” (Breaking Ranks, p. 336). Leading the U.S. into war
for the benefit of Israel is the essence of the Machiavellian
crypto-Zionists known deceptively as neoconservatives.

The
Project for a new (((American))) Century

The
story of how the neoconservatives reached the position of influence
they held under George W. Bush is a complicated one, which I can only
outline. They entered the state apparatus for the first time in the
baggage of Rumsfeld and Cheney, during president Ford’s cabinet
reshuffle known as the “Halloween Massacre,” following Nixon’s
resignation. When the Cold War calmed down after America evacuated
its troops from Vietnam in 1973, and the CIA produced reassuring
analyses of the USSR’s military capabilities and ambitions,
Rumsfeld (as Secretary of Defense) and Cheney (as Chief of Staff)
persuaded Ford to appoint an independent committee, known as Team B,
to revise upward the CIA estimates of the Soviet threat, and
reactivate a war attitude in public opinion, Congress, and
Administration. Team B was chaired by Richard Pipes and co-chaired by
Paul Wolfowitz, both introduced by Richard Perle.

During
the Democratic parenthesis of the Carter presidency (1976–80), the
neoconservatives worked at unifying the largest number of Jews around
their policies, by founding the Jewish Institute for National
Security Affairs (JINSA), which became the second-most powerful
pro-Israel lobby after AIPAC. According to its “mission
statement”
, it is “dedicated to educating Congressional,
military and civilian national security decision-makers on American
defense and strategic interests, primarily in the Middle East, the
cornerstone of which is a robust U.S.-Israeli security cooperation.”
In 1980, the neocons were rewarded by Ronald Reagan for their support
by a dozen posts in national security and foreign policy: Richard
Perle and Douglas Feith to the Department of Defense; Richard Pipes
at the National Security Council; Paul Wolfowitz, Lewis “Scooter”
Libby, and Michael Ledeen in the State Department. They helped Reagan
escalate the Cold War, showering billions of dollars on the
military-industrial complex.

The
long term planning of 9/11 probably started then. Isser Harel,
founder of Israeli secret services (Shai in 1944, Shin Bet
in 1948, Mossad until 1963) is reported as prophesizing in 1980, in
an interview with Christian Zionist Michael Evans, that Islamic
terrorism would end up hitting America in their “phallic symbol”:
“Your biggest phallic symbol is New York City and your tallest
building will be the phallic symbol they will hit”.[10]  (A
whole article would be needed to document and explain the revival of
the Jewish gift of apocalyptic prophecy in recent decades.)

In
1996, during the Clinton years, the neoconservatives threw all their
weight into their ultimate think tank, the Project for the New
American Century (PNAC), directed by William Kristol and Robert
Kagan. PNAC recommended taking advantage of the defeat of communism
to reinforce American hegemony by preventing the emergence of any
rival. Their
Statement
of Principles
vowed
to extend the current
Pax
Americana
,
which entailed “a military that is strong and ready to meet both
present and future challenges.” In its September 2000 report
entitled
Rebuilding
America’s Defenses
,
PNAC anticipated that US forces must become “able to rapidly deploy
and win multiple simultaneous large-scale wars.” This required a
profound transformation, including the development of “a new family
of nuclear weapons designed to address new sets of military
requirements.” Unfortunately, according to the authors of the
report, “the process of transformation […] is likely to be a long
one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event—like a new Pearl
Harbor.” It is certainly no coincidence that the three-hour-long
blockbuster
Pearl
Harbor
was
released in the summer 2001, conveniently entrenching the “New
Pearl Harbor” meme into the minds of millions.

PNAC’s
architects played the American hegemony card by draping themselves in
the super-patriotic discourse of America’s civilizing mission. But
their duplicity is exposed in a document brought to public knowledge
in 2008: a report published in 1996 by the Israeli think tank
Institute for Advanced Strategic and Political Studies (IASPS),
entitled
A
Clean Break: A New Strategy for Securing the Realm
,
written
specifically for the new Israeli prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu.
The team responsible for the report was led by Richard Perle, and
included Douglas Feith and David Wurmser, who figured the same year
among the signatories of PNAC. As its title suggests, the
Clean
Break

report invited Netanyahu to break with the Oslo Accords of 1993,
which officially committed Israel to the return of the territories it
occupied illegally since 1967. The new prime minister should instead
“engage every possible energy on rebuilding Zionism” and reaffirm
Israel’s right to the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.

In
November 2000, Bush Jr. was elected under conditions that raised
protests of electoral fraud. Dick Cheney, who had directed his
campaign, named himself vice-president and introduced two dozens
neoconservatives in foreign policy key positions. The State
Department was entrusted to Colin Powell, but he was surrounded with
neocon aides such as David Wurmser. As National Security Adviser,
Condoleezza Rice, a specialist of Russia with no expertise in the
Middle East, was entirely dependent on her neocon adviser Philip
Zelikow. William Luti and Elliott Abrams, and later Eliot Cohen, were
also tasked with steering Rice. But it was mainly from within the
Defense Department under Donald Rumsfeld that the most influential
neocons were able to fashion US foreign and military policy. Richard
Perle occupied the crucial position of director of the Defense Policy
Board, responsible for defining military strategy, while Paul
Wolfowitz became the “soul of the Pentagon” as deputy secretary
with Douglas Feith as under secretary.

The
Hanukkah miracle to start WWIV

After
eight months in the presidency, Bush was confronted with the
“catastrophic event,” the “new Pearl Harbor” that PNAC had
wished for a year earlier. 9/11 was a real “Hanukkah
miracle”
for Israel, commented Mossad chief Ephraim Halevy and
Israeli National Security Council chairman Uzi Dayan. Netanyahu
rejoiced: “It’s very good
[…] it will generate immediate
sympathy […], strengthen the bond between our two peoples, because
we’ve experienced terror over so many decades, but the United
States has now experienced a massive hemorrhaging of terror.” On
September 21, he published an op-ed in the
New
York Post

entitled “Today, We Are All Americans,” in which he delivered his
favorite propaganda line: “For the bin Ladens of the world, Israel
is merely a sideshow. America is the target.” 

Three days later the
New
Republic

responded with a headline on behalf of the Americans: “We are all
Israelis now.” Americans experienced 9/11 as an act of hatred from
the Arab world, and they felt an immediate sympathy for Israel, which
the neoconservatives relentlessly exploited. One of the aims was to
encourage Americans to view Israel’s oppression of the Palestinians
as part of the global fight against Islamic terrorism.

It
was a great success. In the years preceding September 11, Israel’s
reputation had bottomed out; condemnations had been raining from
around the world for its policy of apartheid and colonization, and
its systematic war against Palestinian command structures. Increasing
numbers of American voices questioned the merits of the special
relationship between the United States and Israel. From the day of
the attacks, it was all over. As Americans now intended to fight Arab
terrorists to the death, they would stop demanding from Israel more
reasonable, proportionate retaliation against Palestinian suicide
bombers and rockets.

Instead,
the president’s speeches (written by neocon David Frum)
characterized the 9/11 attacks as the trigger for a world war of a
new type, one fought against an invisible enemy scattered throughout
the Middle East. First, vengeance must come not only against bin
Laden, but also against the state harboring him: “We will make no
distinction between those who committed these acts and those who
harbor them” (Sept. 11). Second, the war extends to the world: “Our
war on terror begins with Al Qaeda, but it does not end there. It
will not end until every terrorist group of global reach has been
found, stopped and defeated” (Sept. 20). Third, any country that
does not support Washington will be treated as an enemy: “Either
you are with us, or you are with the terrorists” (Sept. 20).

In
an article in the Wall Street Journal dated November 20, 2001,
the neoconservative Eliot Cohen dubbed the war against terrorism as
“World War IV,” a framing soon echoed by other American Zionists
(the odd choice of the name WWIV rather than WWIII comes, I suspect,
from the neocons’ ethnocentric worldview, in which every world war
is a step toward Greater Israel; since one major step was
accomplished in 1967, the Cold War counts as WW3). In September 2004,
at a conference in Washington entitled “World War IV: Why We Fight,
Whom We Fight, How We Fight,” Cohen said: “The enemy in this war
is not ‘terrorism’ […] but militant Islam.” Like the Cold
War, the imminent world war, according to Cohen’s vision, has
ideological roots, will have global implications, and will last a
long time, involving a whole range of conflicts. The self-fulfilling
prophecy of a new World War centered in the Middle East has also been
popularized by Norman Podhoretz, in “How to Win World War IV”
(Commentary, February 2002), followed by a second article in,
“World War IV: How It Started, What It Means, and Why We Have to
Win,” (September 2004), and finally a book titled World War IV:
The Long Struggle Against Islamofascism
(2007).[11]

The
hijacked conspiracy and the controlled opposition

In
the case of 9/11 as in the case of Kennedy, controlled opposition
operates on many levels, and many honest scholars now realize that
the 9/11 Truth movement itself is partly channeled by individuals and
groups secretly aiming at drawing suspicions away from Israel. Such
is certainly the case of the three young Jews (Avery, Rowe, and
Bermas) who directed the film
Loose
Change

(2005), the most widely watched 9/11 conspiracy film since its first
version in 2005. They hitched their whole thesis on a comparison with
the never carried-out false flag project Operation Northwoods (timely
revealed to the public in May 2001 in James
Bamford
’s book
Body
of Secrets
,
written with the support of former NSA director Michael Hayden, now
working for Michael Chertoff), but they failed to mention the attack
on the USS Liberty, a well-documented false flag attack by Israel on
its U.S. ally. 

They did not breathe a word about the
neoconservatives’ loyalty to Israel, and treat anyone who cited the
Israeli role in 9/11 as anti-Semitic. The same can be said of
Bermas’s more recent film
Invisible
Empire
(2010),
also produced by Alex Jones: a compilation of anti-imperialist
clichés focusing on the Bushs and the Rockefellers, without a single
hint of the (((Others))).

It
is interesting to note that the 9/11 scenario put forward by
Loose
Change

had actually been prewritten by Hollywood: on the 4
th
of March, 2001, Fox
TV broadcast the first episode of the series
The
Lone Gunmen
,
watched
by 13 million Americans. The plot is about computer hackers working
for a secret cabal within the U.S. government, who hijack a jet by
remote control with the intent to crash it into one of the Twin
Towers, while making it appear to have been hijacked by Islamic
terrorists. At the last seconds, the pilots manage to regain control
of the plane. The purpose of the failed operation was to trigger a
world war under the pretext of fighting terrorism. Truthers of the
“inside job” school fancy that this episode must have been
written by some whistleblower inside Fox. Unlikely!

There
is, of course, some truth in the “inside job” theory, as I said
at the beginning. Israel (in the wider sense) would not be able to
pull such an operation and get away with it, without complicity at
the highest level of U.S. government. How does that work? Pretty much
like for the Kennedy
assassination
, if you consider that the country was then ruled by
its vice-president Dick Cheney, the president being a mere dummy (see
Lou Dubose and Jake Bernstein,
Vice:
Dick Cheney and the Hijacking of the American Presidency,
Random
House, 2006). In my book
JFK-9/11,
I have proposed a plausible scenario of how Israel had in fact
hijacked a smaller false flag attack on the Pentagon fabricated by
the American Deep State, for the limited purpose of justifying the
overthrow of the Talibans in Afghanistan, a goal fully supported by
such “Great Gamers” as Zbigniew Brzezinski, but which didn’t in
itself interest the neocons.

What
the neocons wanted was a new war against Iraq and then a general
conflagration in the Middle East leading to the crumbling of all the
enemies of Israel, with Syria and Iran high on the list. So they
outbid everyone and gave the operation the scale they wanted with the
help of their New York super-sayan Silvertein. George W. Bush,
Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice, and other goyim who had been kept out
of the loop, finding themselves embroiled in geopolitical
machinations of global scope, could merely try to save face. On
September 19 and 20, Richard Perle’s Defense Policy Board met in
the company of Paul Wolfowitz and Bernard Lewis (inventor of the
self-fulfilling prophecy of the “clash of civilizations”) but in
the absence of Powell and Rice. They prepared a letter to Bush,
written on PNAC letterhead, to remind him of his historic mission:
“Even if evidence does not link Iraq directly to the attack, any
strategy aiming at the eradication of terrorism and its sponsors must
include a determined effort to remove Saddam Hussein from power in
Iraq. Failure to undertake such an effort will constitute an early
and perhaps decisive surrender in the war on international
terrorism.” [12] This was an ultimatum. Bush was certainly aware of
the leverage that the neocons had acquired over the major print and
television media. He was obliged, under penalty of ending in the
proverbial trash bin of history, to endorse the invasion of Iraq that
his father had refused the Zionists ten years earlier.

As
for Brzezinski and other genuine U.S. imperialists, their support for
the invasion of Afghanistan made their timid protests against the
Iraq war ineffective. It was a little late in February 2007 when
Brzezinski denounced before the Senate “a historical, strategic and
moral calamity […] driven by Manichaean impulses and imperial
hubris.” In 2012 he declared, regarding the risk of conflagration
with Iran, that Obama should stop
following Israel like a “stupid mule.”
He soon disappeared
from the MSM, as a useful idiot no longer useful.

The
“half truth” of the exclusively “inside job” theory, which
denounces 9/11 as a false flag operation perpetrated by the American
state on its own citizens, functions like a secondary false flag
hiding the real masters of the operation, who are in fact agents in
the service of a foreign nation. One of the aims of this
inside-jobish controlled opposition is to force American officials to
maintain the “bin Laden did it” masquerade, knowing that tearing
apart the fake Islamic flag would only reveal the U.S. flag, not the
Israeli flag. No longer controlling the media, they would not have
the means to raise this second veil to expose Israel. Any effort to
get at the truth would be political suicide. Everyone understands
what is at stake: if one day, under mounting pressure from public
opinion or for some other strategic reason, the mainstream media
abandons the official bin Laden story, the well-rehearsed slogan
“9/11 was an inside job” will have prepared Americans to turn
against their own government, while the neocon Zionists will remain
untouchable (Machiavelli’s method: make another accomplish your
dirty ends, then turn popular vengeance against him). And God knows
what will happen, if the government has not by then succeeded in
disarming its citizens through Sandy Hook-type psy-ops. Government
officials have little choice but to stick to the Al-Qaeda story, at
least for the next fifty years.

After
reaching this conclusion in
JFK-9/11,
I had the satisfaction of finding that Victor Thorn, in a book that
had eluded me (
Made
in Israel: 9-11 and the Jewish Plot Against America,
Sisyphus
Press, 2011
), had already expressed it in harsher terms: “In
essence, the ‘9-11 truth movement’ was created
prior
to
Sept. 11, 2001 as a means of suppressing news relating to Israeli
complicity. By 2002–2003, ‘truthers’ began appearing at rallies
holding placards that read ‘9-11 was an inside job.’ Initially,
these signs provided hope for those who didn’t believe the
government and mainstream media’s absurd cover stories. But then an
awful realization emerged: The slogan ‘9-11 was an inside job’
was quite possibly the greatest example of Israeli propaganda ever
devised. […] The mantra, ‘9-11 was an inside job’ is only
partially true and is inherently damaging to the ‘truth movement’
because it shifts all attention away from Israel’s traitorous
assault against America. […] Leaders of these fake 9-11 groups know
the truth about Israel’s 9-11 barbarity. Their willingness to
perpetuate or cover it up ultimately makes them as guilty and vile as
those who launched the attacks. 

There are no degrees of separation in
this matter. It’s a black-and-white issue. Tell the entire truth
about Israel’s Murder, Inc. cabal, or sleep in the same infected
bed as these murdering dogs lie in. […] Faux conspiratologists
complain about the government and news sources not telling the truth,
yet they’ve erected an utter blackout on data regarding Israel and
9-11.”

The
missing .3 trillion

Some
readers will complain that I am making a very complex operation
appear too simple. I plead guilty: I have merely tried here to
outline the case against Israel in the short scope of an article. But
I am fully aware that creating Greater Israel through a world war
fought by the U.S. might not have been the only consideration in the
preparation of 9/11. Many private interests had to be involved. Yet I
believe none of them interfered with Israel’s plan, and most of
them supported it.

There
is, for example, the missing
gold in the WTC basement
: $200 million were recovered from the
estimated $1 billion stored: who took the rest? But that is nothing
compared to the $2.3 trillion that were missing from the accounts of
the Department of Defense for the year 2000, in addition to $1.1
trillion missing for 1999, according to a televised declaration made
on September 10
th,
2001, the day before the attacks, by Donald Rumsfeld. Just for
comparison, this is more than one thousand times the colossal losses
of Enron, which triggered a chain of bankruptcies that same year. All
this money evaporated into thin air under the watch of William Cohen,
Defense Secretary during Bill Clinton’s second term. In 2001, the
man who was tasked to help track down the missing trillions was Under
Secretary of Defense (Comptroller) Dov Zakheim, a member of PNAC and
an ordained rabbi. 

Practically, the mystery had to be resolved by
financial analysts at Resource Services Washington (RSW).
Unfortunately, their offices were destroyed by “al-Qaeda” the
following morning. The “hijackers” or Flight AA77, rather than
hitting the command center on the eastern side of the Pentagon, chose
to attempt a theoretically impossible downward spiral at 180 degrees
in order to hit the west side of the building precisely at the
location of the accounting offices. The 34 experts at RSW perished in
their offices, together with 12 other financial analysts, as is noted
in the biography of the team leader Robert Russell for the National
9/11 Pentagon Memorial
: “The weekend before his death, his
entire office attended a crab feast at the Russell home. They were
celebrating the end of the fiscal-year budget completion. Tragically,
every person that attended that party was involved in the Pentagon
explosion, and are currently missing”.

By
an incredible coincidence, one of the financial experts trying to
make sense of the Pentagon financial loss, Bryan Jack, was reported
to have died at the precise location of his office, not because he
was working there that day, but because he was on a business trip on
Flight AA77. In the words of the
Washington
Post

database
: “Bryan C. Jack was responsible for crunching
America’s defense budget. He was a passenger on American Airlines
Flight 77, bound for official business in California when his plane
struck the Pentagon, where, on any other day, Jack would have been at
work at his computer”. Yahweh must have a sense of chutzpah! 

Laurent
Guyénot is the author of JFK-9/11:
50 years of Deep State, Progressive Press, 2014
, and From
Yahweh to Zion: Jealous God, Chosen People, Promised Land … Clash
of Civilizations
, 2018. (or $30 shipping included from Sifting
and Winnowing, POB 221, Lone Rock, WI 53556). –
Source

Footnotes

[1]
Philippe Broussard, “En dépit des déclarations américaines, les
indices menant à Ben Laden restent minces,” Le Monde, September
25, 2001.

[2] Gilad Atzmon, Being in Time: a Post-Political
Manifesto, Interlink Publishing, 2017 , p. 142.

[3] David Ray
Griffin, 9/11 Contradictions, Arris Books, 2008, pp. 170-182; Webster
Griffin Tarpley, 9/11 Synthetic Terror Made in USA, Progressive
Press, 2008, pp. 321-324.

[4] Christopher Bollyn, Solving
9-11: The Deception That Changed the World, C. Bollyn, 2012, pp.
278–280.

[5] It is quoted here from Bollyn’s book and from
Justin Raimondo, The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection,
iUniverse, 2003.

[6] Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11: The
Deception That Changed the World, C. Bollyn, 2012, p. 159.

[7]
Justin Raimondo, The Terror Enigma: 9/11 and the Israeli Connection,
iUniverse, 2003, p. 3.

[8] Christopher Bollyn, Solving 9-11:
The Deception that Changed the World, 2012 , pp. 278-280.

[9]
Quoted by Andrew Cockburn, who claims to have heard the anecdote from
“friends of the family”, in Rumsfeld: His Rise, His fall, and
Catastrophic Legacy, Scribner, 2011, p. 219.

[10] Michael
Evans told of this prophecy in an interview with Deborath Calwell and
in his book The American Prophecies, Terrorism and Mid-East Conflict
Reveal a Nation’s Destiny), quoted in Christopher Bollyn, Solving
9-11: The Deception That Changed the World, C. Bollyn, 2012, p.
71.

[11] Stephen Sniegoski, The Transparent Cabal: The
Neoconservative Agenda, War in the Middle East, and the National
Interest of Israel, Enigma Edition, 2008, p. 193.

[12] Stephen
Sniegoski, The Transparent Cabal: The Neoconservative Agenda, War in
the Middle East, and the National Interest of Israel, Enigma Edition,
2008, p. 144.

Zie
ook de reacties onder
het artikel van ICH.

*  Zie: ‘Tell Congress: Stop the Patriot Act!‘ >>de volgende tekst is een deel van het schrijven bij deze petitie: A federal judge ruled that
all the government spying that Edward Snowden revealed back in 2013
was illegal.1

But that doesn’t mean the NSA,
FBI, and other Trump-controlled intelligence agencies will suddenly
stop spying on Americans’ phone records, internet searches, and web
browser history. Far from it.

Congress could still
legalize spying on US citizens without a warrant.

They could do it anytime between now and the end of the year, unless
you speak up and stop them.

Sign
the petition: Stop the Patriot Act! Don’t reauthorize spying on
Americans without a warrant!

** Waarbij gebouw 7 van het WTC al niet kan zijn ingestort als reactie op het instorten van de torens……

Voor meer berichten over 9/11 (en dat zijn er heel wat) klik op het label 911, direct onder dit bericht.

Mijn excuus, maar vanwege het beperkte aantal labels dat je mag gebruiken in blogger, ontbreken er wel ‘een paar’ belangrijke labels. (maar nogmaals: door te klikken op 911 zie je genoeg berichten waarin je de belangrijkste figuren en labels ‘tegenkomt’, waarvan er een aantal in het bovenstaande artikel worden genoemd)

9/11: getuigenverklaringen over het opblazen van de Twin Towers verzwegen

Na de aanvallen op de Twin Towers waren
er een ongelofelijk aantal getuigen die verklaarden dat er meerdere
explosies waren te horen vlak voordat de torens instorten….. Op de
dag zelf waren een aantal van die verklaringen te horen, echter men
ging daar in de reguliere media niet verder op door…..

Zie de hieronder weergegeven video van Brasscheck
TV, met o.a. het verslag dat er brokstukken zover terechtkwamen, dat dit alleen middels een explosie mogelijk moet zijn
geweest…. Ook het verpulveren van beton kan niet veroorzaakt worden
door het invliegen van een vliegtuig……

Niet het vertellen van wat er is
gebeurd is een samenzweringstheorie, nee de werkelijke samenzwering
leidde tot het neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC.
Let altijd bij dit soort zaken op, wie er voordeel had bij een dergelijke gebeurtenis, in dit geval het
neerhalen van de Twin Towers* en dat waren veel
bedrijven in de VS (vooral de wapenindustrie), VS overheidsinstellingen (ook een fiks deel van de overheidsschuld zou zijn verdampt op 11 september 2001), alle geheime diensten van de VS, VS politie,
het leger van de VS (oorlogsvoering), de plutocraten in de VS (waaronder degenen die de Twin Towers kochten en vlak voor de aanslag voor een kapitaal hadden verzekerd*) en zelfs George W. Bush die op dat moment als president al volkomen werd uitgekotst door het overgrote deel van de bevolking…..

Het voorgaande niet in de laatste plaats daar de beurs al op z’n gat lag, iets dat de regering Bush later toeschreef aan de aanvallen van 9/11, zonder daar amper voor te worden bekritiseerd door de reguliere westerse media, sterker nog men zegt daar voor zo’n 97% nog steeds dat de beurs onderuit ging door de aanvallen van 9/11……. De ‘internetzeepbel liep al leeg of implodeerde (wat je wilt) ver voordat de vliegtuigen de torens raakten!

9/11
eye witnesses ignored

The
news media was fascinated by 9/11.

But
they didn’t like the eye witness accounts of multiple explosions that
day.

So
they made them all go away – but we kept them.

WHAT
THE REAL 9/11 WITNESSES SAW AND HEARD

CENSORED
AND SILENCED

TOTAL
FAILURE BY THE NEWS MEDIA


On
9/11, the news media did an epic job of NOT following up on the
hundreds of eyewitnesses who clearly stated they heard numerous
explosions.

How
do you do that?

How
do you ignore eyewitnesses to things like explosions?

You
do it when you want to kill millions of people, when you want to go
to war for oil.

Click
here to
 support
Brasscheck

========================================

*
Zie de volgende video behorend bij: 
9/11 en de voorkennis van de aanslagen in de VS‘ (daar kan je de tekst bij dat bericht van mij en het artikel van Brasscheck TV lezen)

Zie ook:

Who rented the 91st floor of the World Trade Center? THE SIMPLE CASE FOR ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT IN 9/11′ and WHO WIRED THE BUILDINGS?

9/11 voorkennis verzwegen in officiële rapporten

9/11 en de voorkennis van de aanslagen in de VS

9/11: New Yorkse brandweercommandanten vragen een nieuw onderzoek naar de aanslagen op het het WTC in 2001

9/11 No Question, It Was Controlled Demolition

9/11: de teller voor het aantal door VS/NAVO gedode mensen staat intussen op meer dan 2,5 miljoen‘ (artikel van 11 september 2019)

SPECIAL REPORT – More Censored 9/11 History

First The Explosion And Then The “Planes”

9/11 “The Palestinians cheered” hoax

9/11 Wiring The Buildings

MIKE PENCE – FAKE ANTHRAX VICTIM?:

If you don’t known how suspect the Anthrax scare was, this is worth watching:

Zie voorts:

9/11 forum geblokkeerd, de waarheid mag niet gezegd worden……..

Spanningen met Iran: VS geschiedenis van false flag operaties en andere manipulaties die tot oorlog hebben geleid

De rol van Israël en de VS in de 9/11 aanslagen op het WTC‘ 

9/11: de leugens over smeltend staal van de Twin Towers

9/11: Al Qaida tjokvol agenten van Saoedi-Arabië, VS, Israël en Egypte

9/11 voorafgegaan door CIA visa fraude…..

9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……

9/11: Palestijnen hebben niet gejuicht voor de aanslagen op de Twin Towers‘ (mijn commentaar bij het bericht dat hierboven vermeld staat bij het artikel en video van Brasscheck TV: 9/11 “The Palestinians cheered Hoax”. Heb dit zo gelaten daar de link naar dit bericht al veel ouder is)

9/11 eerst de explosie waarna de ‘vliegtuigen’ de Twin Towers raken‘ (hier mijn commentaar dat ik eerder schreef bij het Brasscheck artikel dat hierboven al vermeld staat, zie: First The Explosians And Then The “Planes” Heb dit zo gelaten daar ook de link naar dit bericht al veel ouder is)

9/11: professor stelt dat WTC-gebouwen gecontroleerd zijn gesloopt, de bewijzen daarvoor zijn overweldigend

Pearl Harbor (7 december 1941) en de aanslagen van 9/11 hebben veel overeenkomsten………

9/11 de verklaring van de VS overheid aangaande het instorten van WTC gebouw 7 is vals……….

911 samenzweringstheorie wint nog meer aan geloofwaardigheid……

911, de beurs en geschiedvervalsing…….

9/11, WikiLeaks, Prism en ‘complottheorieën’

911, een ‘leuk’ feit

En niet onbelangrijk: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

9/11 voorkennis verzwegen in officiële rapporten

Tijdens en vlak na de
Twin Towers aanslagen, werden een aantal Israëlische mannen
gearresteerd die feestvierden met de WTC ramp op de achtergrond. Het
was duidelijk dat ze feestvierden n.a.v. de aanvallen op de Twin
Towers….. Volgens eigen zeggen waren zij Mossad agenten die werden
uitgezonden om de vernieling van het WTC te filmen, zo verklaarden ze
later op de Israëlische tv…… Zonder enig onderzoek werden de
mannen vrijgelaten en mochten ze zelfs terugreizen naar Israël…….

Paul
Craig Roberts, de schrijver van het 
Information Clearing House artikel dat hieronder is opgenomen, schrijft verder over de ‘daders’
en haalt intussen al bekende zaken aan, als dat deze daders
onmogelijk de vliegtuigen in de Twin Towers kunnen hebben gevlogen,
een zaak die zelfs geroutineerde piloten naar eigen zeggen niet
kunnen (de daders zouden een paar vlieglessen hebben gehad in kleine
vliegtuigjes). Het is dan ook duidelijk dat de zogenaamde daders
werden begeleid door of geheime diensten van de VS en/of Israël, dit
om de false flag operatie, die 9/11 was, te verhullen…. Overigens werden de vliegtuigen volgens een aantal deskundigen op afstand bediend….

Ook
genoemd door Roberts de aanval op het Pentagon, daar moeten diverse
camera’s beelden hebben opgenomen van wat er werkelijk gebeurde, deze beelden
worden al 18 jaar lang door de FBI afgeschermd voor het publiek en de
politiek. Iedereen met meer dan 2 hersencellen kan zien dat er nooit
een vliegtuig in het Pentagon kan zijn gevlogen, daarvoor was de
schade veel te gering (en dat is nog maar 1 van de redenen die
aangeven dat het geen vliegtuig kan zijn geweest, maar waarschijnlijk
een raket van de VS…..)

Nog een
vreemde zaak, de telefoontjes uit het vliegtuig dat in
Pennsylvania zou zijn neergestort: in die tijd was het nog
onmogelijk om met een mobiele telefoon vanuit een vliegtuig te bellen met het
thuisfront…

Roberts betoogt terecht dat wanneer een handjevol terroristen de VS zo hebben kunnen misleiden (als men het publiek wil doen geloven), Rusland zelfs al ten tijde van de Sovjet-Unie de VS en West-Europa zonder veel moeite kon hebben weggevaagd……

Zoals dik is bewezen sinds 11 september 2001 is het neerhalen van de Twin Towers middels vliegtuigen een onmogelijke zaak, daarnaast hebben deskundigen de resten van heftige springstoffen teruggevonden in de puinhopen van 9/11…… 

Hoeveel bewijs heb je nog nodig om in te zien dat 9/11 een door de VS overheid gecontroleerde aanslag was…… Roberts noemt nog een aantal zaken, die duidelijk maken dat 9/11 een door de VS (waarschijnlijk met hulp van Israël) opgezette zaak is….. Bush en Cheney zouden hebben geweigerd te getuigen voor de 9/11 commissie…… De leidende figuren van deze commissie stellen zelfs dat ze tot bepaalde zaken geen toegang hadden, dat men werd voorgelogen en dat het de opzet was dat de commissie zou falen……

Het gaat zelfs zover dat de VS overheid zelf de leugen heeft gelanceerd dat de gebouwen door een kernwapen dan wel een gericht-energiewapen (o.a. laser en deeltjesstralen) werden neergehaald om degenen die niet geloven in de officiële lezing in een belachelijk daglicht te stellen en daarmee de aandacht af te leiden van de werkelijke reden van instorting van de gebouwen…… 

Lees het
volgende artikel en zegt het voort! De aanslagen zijn nu 18 jaar
geleden, daarbij kwamen volgens zeggen 3.000 mensen om het leven,
als reactie daarop heeft de VS alleen in Irak al meer dan 1,5 miljoen
mensen vermoord (met hulp van andere NAVO-lidstaten), in Afghanistan
zouden dit er rond de 500.000 zijn (al houdt het westen veel lagere
aantallen aan….). Als reactie daarop hebben we ‘islamterreur’ op de
straten van Europa en zijn er enorme vluchtelingenstromen
opgang gekomen, voorts zijn onze privacyrechten zo goed als helemaal
uitgekleed (al is dat laatste ook de duidelijke opzet van de 9/11
aanvallen, zie de bevoegdheden en de enorme geldstromen die de geheime diensten erbij kregen na 9/11…..)

Some
of the Many Things Most Americans Never Heard About 9/11

By
Paul Craig Roberts

September
14, 2019 “
Information
Clearing House

– The “Dancing Israelis” who turned out to be Israeli Mossad
agents caught filming and celebrating the destruction of the twin
towers. Arrested by police and released without investigation, they
were not mentioned in the 911 Commission Report.  Later on
Israeli TV they said they were sent to New York to film the
destruction of the twin towers.  Allegedly, there was no
advance warning of the event, but obviously the Israelis knew.  


The
alleged fundamentalist orthodox fanatical Muslims who were prepared
to die to be martyrs, but who drank, drugged, and lived with
strippers and prostitutes in Florida. They were the patsies paraded
through flight schools and left a highly visible public record.  They
all flunked out and could not even fly small planes, but performed
miraculous flight feats in their attacks on the WTC towers and
Pentagon that military and civilian airline pilots say are beyond
their own skills.  These Saudi Arabians were being operated
by US or Israeli intelligence to create a record to serve as a
parallel patsy operation that could be used to cover up the false
flag attack.


Numerous
video cameras recorded whatever exploded at the Pentagon, but the FBI
has refused to release them for 18 years. Clearly, the videos do not
support the official story.


About
half of the alleged hijackers have been found alive and well and deny
that they had ever left their countries.  


In
2001 no cell phone calls were possible from aircraft at the altitudes
from which calls were reported. 


The
airliners that allegedly hit the twin towers were flimsy compared to
the steel and concrete of the towers.  The airliners would
have smashed against the structure and fallen to the street below.


Pre-knowledge
of 9/11 was widespread.  The stocks of the two allegedly
hijacked airlines were sold short prior to the event, resulting in
large profits when the stocks fell in response to the hijackings. The
short-sellers were swept under the carpet and not investigated.

FBI
director Robert Mueller was instrumental in covering up for the false
official story of 9/11, a story that has zero evidence in its behalf.

If
a handful of young men with no intelligence service or government
support can defeat the entire national security state of the United
States and all of its NATO and Israeli allies and successfully attack
with devastating results both New York and the Pentagon itself—the
very symbol of American military supremacy—the Soviet Union could
have wiped out the US and all of Europe without detection.  Don’t
you wonder how we survived the Soviet Union when the “Great
American Superpower” was so easily defeated by a handful of young
Saudi Arabians?


Four
hijacked airliners are alleged hijacked, all at airports served by an
Israeli security company. 

All four airliners allegedly crash.  Two
into the WTC towers, one into a field in Pennsylvania, and one into
the Pentagon.  Yet no airliner debris exists.  The
Pentagon’s lawn is not even scratched.

The
President of the United States refuses to testify before the 9/11
Commission unless he is accompanied by his handler, Vice President
Cheney.  Both refuse to testify under oath. The 9/11
Commission is oh-so-respectful to the distinguished president and
vice president.


One
member of the 9/11 Commission, a US Senator, resigned from the
Commission, saying that “the fix is in.”  After the
Commission report was issued, the Commission chairman, vice chairman,
and legal counsel wrote books in which they said that information was
withheld from the Commission, that the Commission was lied to and
considered referring the false testimony to the Justice (sic)
Department for prosecution, and that “the Commission was set up to
fail.”  And not a peep from the controlled pressitute
media whose only function is to deliver the controlled explanations
that the ruling oligarchs want planted into Americans’ minds.


Tenants
of the WTC buildings reported constant noises, floors sealed off,
service disruptions and that the excuse was the installation of fiber
optic cable. If the buildings faced condemnation as reported because
of asbestos fireproofing, who would go to the expense of installing
fiber optic cable to upgrade the Internet capability of condemned
buildings?


Scientists
have found reacted and unreacted nano-thermite and other elements
used in controlled demolition.  They have proved the
existence of these elements.  They have samples from the
WTC dust left which they have offered to scientists and governments
for testing in order to prove or disprove their own findings.  No
takers.


Instead,
we have the appearance of nonsensical claims that the WTC buildings
were brought down by a directed energy weapon and by nuclear
bombs.  These are preposterous allegations, the purpose of
which is the deliberate creation of disinformation in order to focus
attention away from the false official story and bury it in
disagreements about what caused the buildings to fail.

I
have checked with weapons specialists who are critics of US
government foreign policy and who monitor every development in weapon
systems in the US and Russia. This is what they tell me:  “I
can confidently state that no direct energy weapon, capable of
demolishing such a structure at the Twin Towers, existed in 2001, nor
does it exist today.”


Another
reported that there are lab tests of directed energy in Russia but no
deployed weapon. He suggested that people who believe in this fantasy
story should explain the safe source of high energy that the alleged
weapon used, and how it was moved on site and removed without
detection.  Moreover, a directed energy burst would show on
detectors which monitor the electromagnetic spectrum.  No
such evidence exists. Since no such weapon has ever been tested to
bring down skyscrapers, why would the government take the risk of
using such a weapon for the first time in a public scenario where who
knows what could go wrong and explanations would have to be
given?  And why reveal to foreign powers the existence of
such a weapon?  Controlled demolition is an old and
familiar technology that works.  And it did.

I
could go on and on.  


As
I wrote in a previous column, when Americans fell for the 9/11
deception, they lost their country, and peoples in seven countries
lost their lives, limbs, and families.


Dr.
Paul Craig Roberts was Assistant Secretary of the Treasury for
Economic Policy and associate editor of the Wall Street Journal. He
was columnist for Business Week, Scripps Howard News Service, and
Creators Syndicate. He has had many university appointments. His
internet columns have attracted a worldwide following. Roberts’
latest books are 
The
Failure of Laissez Faire Capitalism and Economic Dissolution of the
West
How
America Was Lost
,
and 
The
Neoconservative Threat to World Order
.

=======================================

Zie ook:

9/11 en de voorkennis van de aanslagen in de VS

9/11: New Yorkse brandweercommandanten vragen een nieuw onderzoek naar de aanslagen op het het WTC in 2001

9/11 No Question, It Was Controlled Demolition

9/11: de teller voor het aantal door VS/NAVO gedode mensen staat intussen op meer dan 2,5 miljoen

SPECIAL REPORT – More Censored 9/11 History

First The Explosion And Then The “Planes”

9/11 “The Palestinians cheered” hoax

9/11 Wiring The Buildings

MIKE PENCE – FAKE ANTHRAX VICTIM?:

THE CIA-VISA FRAUD THAT PRECEDED 9/11 (5 min.):

Zie verder over Irak: Misvormde kinderen in Irak door gebruik van verarmd uranium in VS munitie (en zie de andere links in dat bericht naar de oorlog in Irak)

9/11 en de voorkennis van de aanslagen in de VS

Brasscheck
TV heeft afgelopen week een aantal video’s en geluidsfragmenten
gepubliceerd waarin duidelijk te zien en te horen is dat de aanslagen op o.a. het
WTC in 2001 een door de VS zelf georganiseerde zaak is……

Ook
het volgende artikel en video van Brasscheck TV gaat door op deze
weg, in de video zie je bijvoorbeeld een man, die zogenaamd
toevallig aanwezig was en kort na deze aanslagen al het verhaal
ophangt dat de VS tot op de dag van vandaag volhoudt, ondanks het grote aantal
deskundigen die van dit verhaal gehakt hebben gemaakt (dat de
vliegtuigen een zo heftige brand hebben veroorzaakt dat de Twin Towers
zijn ingestort, iets dat volgens deze deskundigen alleen met
explosieven bereikt kan worden, springstoffen vooral in de basis van
de torens en gebouw 7 van het WTC….) Zelfs presentatoren van
nieuwszenders wisten vlak na de aanval al te vertellen wat er gebeurd
was, althans wat de toenmalige en opvolgende VS regeringen de wereld
willen laten geloven dat er gebeurd is……

De
redactie van Brasscheck TV destijds kwam een paar uur na de aanslagen
tot de conclusie dat het een ‘inside job’ moet zijn geweest, ofwel
dat de VS zelf de zaak heeft georganiseerd. Volgens de redactie kon
dit niet anders, gezien de
enorme organisatie die nodig was om e.e.a. te regelen, een ‘job’ waar
de luchtdefensie van de VS bij betrokken moet zijn geweest….
Uiteraard was onderdeel van het oordeel dat Brasscheck gaf, de
hiervoor aangehaalde figuren die met voorkennis de gebeurtenissen
‘beoordeelden’ voor de camera’s.

Onder
het geheel nog een video van Brasscheck waarin men het geldspoor van
deze aanslagen volgt 
(follow
the money) om bij de daders en handlangers te komen. Zo hebben ‘de
eigenaren’ (lease contract voor 99 jaar) van de Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein en zijn bedrijf Silverstein Properties plus een paar andere
miljonairs kapitalen verdiend aan deze aanslagen, waarvoor ze een paar dagen
tevoren nog verzekeringen hadden afgesloten……

De
daders hadden de idee dat de servers en harde schijven van de Deutsche Bank vernietigd zouden zijn nadat de gebouwen waren
ingestort, echter een gespecialiseerde Duitse firma (destijds het
enige bedrijf ter wereld) heeft toch informatie van de harde schijven enz.
kunnen achterhalen, daaruit blijkt dat de computers van de Deutsche
Bank vlak voor de aanslagen werden overgenomen door een derde. Men
kon zien dat vlak voor de aanslagen een bedrag van 100 miljoen dollar
van eigenaar veranderde…….

Uit
transacties kon men later afleiden dat o.a. wapenfabrikanten flink
garen hebben gesponnen bij de aanslagen, waaruit blijkt dat er
voorkennis moet zijn geweest over de aanslagen, ook
aandelenhandelaren hebben grote bedragen ‘verdiend’ met voorkennis
van de aanslagen…..

Het
bedrijf Ptech komt een aantal keren terug in de video en wordt genoemd
als sponsor van terreurgroepen….. Zelfs de NAVO heeft geprofiteerd
van de aanslagen. Ex-CIA agent Robert Bear is ervan overtuigd dat men zelfs in het
Witte Huis van te voren op de hoogte moet zijn geweest van de destijds nog komende
aanslagen op 11 september 2001……..

Nogmaals
zoals al vaak op deze plek gesteld: zie wie er profiteert van
dergelijke aanslagen en beste bezoeker, die mensen vindt je vooral in
de VS! Zo profiteerden en profiteren wapenfabrikanten nog steeds van
de meer dan belachelijke oorlog tegen terreur (war on terror)……
Hetzelfde geldt voor de geheime diensten die er kapitalen bijkregen
en intussen bevoegdheden hebben die thuishoren in de eerste beste
dictatuur….. Ook de politie heeft geprofiteerd van de 9/11
aanslagen, in de VS begint de politie meer en meer op een militaire
macht te lijken, zoveel extra geld is daar in deze machtshandhaver
van de overheid gestoken……. George W. Bush profiteerde daar hij voor de aanslagen te boek stond als de minst populaire president ooit…. De beurs lag al op z’n reet voor de aanslagen, maar na de aanslagen werd en wordt er gesteld dat de beurs op z’n reet ging door die aanslagen……. Mensen er zijn wat betreft de profiterende organisaties en bedrijven nog veel meer namen te noemen >> zie de video.

Eén
ding is zeker; de aanslagen van 11 september 2001 zijn een heel
smerige zaak waar de VS zelf de hand in heeft gehad…… (er zouden overigens ook miljarden aan staatsschulden van de VS zijn verdampt bij deze
aanslagen…..) 

9/11 And The News Media Puppet Show


It’s
scary to admit this, but we were one of the first – if not the first
– to publicly state that 9/11 could NOT have been anything but an
inside job.

We made that statement in writing via email to the
Brasscheck list before noon on 9/11.

Why were we so
sure?

Logistics. The world runs on logistics.

Nothing
this complicated could have been executed without extensive planning
and control over the operation of country’s air defense.

Also,
when we saw the early and well coordinated media disinfo campaign
coming from all the television networks we knew the event had to have
been prearranged.

(We were also the first to call attention to
the existence of “crisis actors” though we did not call
them that at the time.)

Copied all over the Internet, this
Brasscheck video has been seen well over 5 million times.

THE
9/11 SOLUTION

HOW THE MYTH WAS SOLD

AN
ORIGINAL BRASSCHECKTV.COM PRODUCTION

We
produced this in 2003 and released it in time for the second year
anniversary of 9/11.

It’s
been viewed over 5 million times.

It’s
also been taken down dozens of times by various hosting companies
trying to obscure how many times it’s actually been viewed.

Notice
that in perfectly coordinated fashion, the top US TV news networks
pinned the crime of 9/11 on Osama bin Laden before the dust had even
settled.

Here’s
everything you need to know about TV news:

Anchormen
(and women) are just actors.

They
may have dabbled in news reporting at one time in their lives, but
they are hired for their ability to convey stories credibly…whether
they know what they’re talking about or not and whether it’s true
or not.

The
ability to credibly speak utter nonsense to millions night after
night is a relatively rare skill and is very highly paid.

That’s
what newsreaders get their big salaries for and they understand that
to keep the paychecks coming, they’ve got to keep reading the
‘news’ – whatever is handed to them to read – and make it
sound believable without question.

The
real power in the newsroom is held by the person who hands the news
reader the script, selects the guest “experts” and tells the
reporters on the street who to talk to.

To
pull off the scam you saw in this video requires a grand total of
just three people (one for each of the clips.) Three “embedded”
news directors in the employ of an intelligence agency.

All
year long these people collect two paychecks, one from the TV network
and one from the Agency.

When
needed, they do what needs to be done – as they all clearly did in
perfectly coordinated fashion the first hours after the 9/11 attack.

Ready
to to deeper down the rabbit hole?

Check
out this live news report, 
just
hours before John F. Kennedy was assassinated.

Video:https://www.brasscheck.com/video/the-9-11-solution/


Brasscheck TV


P.S.
We can’t make this unique news service available without the help of
our subscribers.

​​​​​​​

Please
consider joining the ranks of BrasscheckTV.com supporters


Thanks!


Details
here:
https://www.brasscheck.com/video/donate-to-brasscheck-tv/

=============================

THE
9/11 BONANZA 
FOLLOWING THE MONEY

(hier de link naar de tekst bij dit bericht)

===================================

Zie ook:

9/11 voorkennis verzwegen in officiële rapporten

9/11: New Yorkse brandweercommandanten vragen een nieuw onderzoek naar de aanslagen op het het WTC in 2001

9/11 No Question, It Was Controlled Demolition

9/11: de teller voor het aantal door VS/NAVO gedode mensen staat intussen op meer dan 2,5 miljoen

SPECIAL REPORT – More Censored 9/11 History

First The Explosion And Then The “Planes”

9/11 “The Palestinians cheered” hoax

9/11 Wiring The Buildings

Hier nog wat onderbroekbom berichten:

De onderbroekbom-leugen ten behoeve van onveilige body scanners‘ 

De onderbroekbom: één grote leugen, die duizenden vliegveld bodyscanners heeft ‘opgeleverd’‘ 


Onderbroekbom (25 december 2009) een enorm onzin verhaal, weer zijn we voorgelogen…….


Azijnpisser eist per direct strengere anti-terreurmaatregelen!!!


Een onderbroekbom
Voor meer berichten over 9/11 klik op het label 911, direct onder dit bericht (het kan zijn dat je na een aantal berichten het laatste telkens herhaald ziet, dan even opnieuw onder het laatst gelezen bericht op hetzelfde label klikken).

9/11: New Yorkse brandweercommandanten vragen een nieuw onderzoek naar de aanslagen op het het WTC in 2001

Goed
nieuws beste bezoeker, een paar brandweercommandanten uit New York
eisen een nieuw onderzoek naar de aanslag op het World Trade Center (WTC) in New York,
gisteren 18 jaar geleden……

Er is
intussen zo ongelofelijk veel meer bekend over wat er wel of niet is
gebeurd op 11 september 2001, dat een onderzoek van het hoogste
belang is, zeker daar een enorm aantal VS burgers (en andere wereldburgers) de officiële lezing
al lang niet meer geloven……

Zo waren
er eerst explosies te horen, voordat de vliegtuigen de Twin Towers
invlogen….. Voorts is het onmogelijk voor mensen met weinig vliegervaring
en al helemaal met zulke grote vliegtuigen zo de torens in te
vliegen, als de beelden ons doen geloven…… De Twin Towers en
gebouw 7 van het WTC kunnen onmogelijk zijn ingestort door het
invliegen van de 2 vliegtuigen (voor gebouw 7 geldt dat des te
meer…….. 

En dan is het voorgaande maar een kleine greep uit
ongelofelijk groot archief aan feitenmateriaal, voor een groot deel samengesteld uit verklaringen van echte deskundigen en dat is opgebouwd na 11
september 2001…… Een archief dat aangeeft dat de officiële lezing van de gebeurtenissen op 9/11 niets, maar dan ook helemaal niets met de waarheid te maken hebben!!

Vergeet
niet dat voor deze ‘aanslagen’ waarbij 3.000 mensen om het leven zouden zijn
gekomen, intussen meer dan 2,5 miljoen mensen zijn vermoord door de
VS met hulp van andere NAVO-lidstaten in het Midden-Oosten, Afrika en
Afghanistan (o.a. door Nederland en dus met ons belastinggeld…)….. Door deze VS/NAVO terreur in illegaal begonnen oorlogen
werd er ‘islamterreur’ op de straten van West-Europa gecreëerd en ontstonden
er enorme vluchtelingenstromen richting datzelfde Europa….. 

Tot slot: deze ‘aanslagen’ hebben
ertoe geleid dat we onze privacyrechten zo goed als kwijt zijn en de
geheime diensten, die zoveel vuile spelletjes hebben gespeeld, kregen er een enorme bak geld bij en hebben nu bevoegdheden waar
men daar eerder alleen van kon dromen……

Het
volgende artikel geschreven door John Vibes komt van TruthTheory en werd door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media:

New
York Area Fire Commissioners Call for New 9/11 Investigation

September
10, 2019 at 9:23 pm

Written
by 
Truth
Theory

(TT) —
September 11, 2001, was nearly 20 years ago, and after all this time,
so many questions still remain about what exactly happened. It is not
socially acceptable to question the official explanation that was
given for the collapse of the towers and the other events of that
day, but now these questions are being taken more seriously.

However,
the rushed and poorly managed 9/11 commission report did not do an
adequate job at investigating the crimes, which left experts in a
variety of different fields with questions about the official story.
Many of these professionals belong to an organization called
Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth, who have been pushing for a
new investigation into the attacks for many years.

This
July, they announced a major breakthrough in their fight for a proper
investigation.

According
to a press release published on the group’s website, New York Fire
Commissioners who were closely involved with the events of that day,
have called for a new investigation into the 9/11 attacks.

On
July 24, the Franklin Square and Munson Fire Districts voted
unanimously for a new investigation, citing “overwhelming evidence”
that “pre-planted explosives . . . caused the destruction of the
three World Trade Center buildings.”

The
resolution was written by Commissioner Christopher Gioia, and
received overwhelming support from Commissioner Dennis Lyons.

We
have a memorial — a piece of steel from the World Trade Center with
28 holes where the nuts and bolts used to go. Every year on the 11th,
we put a rose in each hole for the 24 Nassau County firefighters and
four Franklin Square residents who died on 9/11
,”
Commissioner Lyons said.

When
the vote was passed, the families of 9/11 victims showed up in the
audience to express their support for the cause and their gratitude
to the departments for making this issue a priority.

Commissioner
Gioia said that he expects support from other districts throughout
the city, and hopes that they will be passing similar resolutions in
solidarity.

We
were the first fire district to pass this resolution. We won’t be
the last,

Gioia said.

This
renewed interest in a proper investigation was sparked last year,
when Geoffrey S. Berman, the United States Attorney for the Southern
District of New York, filed a petition on behalf of the Lawyers’
Committee for 9/11 Inquiry.

The
petition highlighted a large body of evidence about the World Trade
Center attacks, which was ultimately presented to a grand jury.
Berman’s success through the courts gave many New York City
firefighters hope that they could finally get to the bottom of what
happened on that day, and find justice for the friends and loved ones
who were lost.

PRESS
CONFERENCE:
 (Starts
at 54:50)

By John
Vibes
 / Republished
with permission / 
Truth
Theory
 / Report
a typo

========================================

Zie ook:

9/11 voorkennis verzwegen in officiële rapporten

9/11 en de voorkennis van de aanslagen in de VS

9/11 No Question, It Was Controlled Demolition

9/11: de teller voor het aantal door VS/NAVO gedode mensen staat intussen op meer dan 2,5 miljoen

SPECIAL REPORT – More Censored 9/11 History

First The Explosion And Then The “Planes”

9/11 “The Palestinians cheered” hoax

9/11 Wiring The Buildings

Voor meer berichten over 9/11 klik op het label 911, direct onder dit bericht (het kan zijn dat je na een aantal berichten het laatste telkens herhaald ziet, dan even opnieuw onder het laatst gelezen bericht op hetzelfde label klikken).

9/11: de leugens over smeltend staal van de Twin Towers

Volgens
de onderzoeken naar de aanslagen op de Twin Towers op 11 september
2001, zouden deze torens zijn ingestort door de klap van de
vliegtuigen tegen de torens, waarna brandende kerosine van de
vliegtuigen het staal van de torens zou hebben doen smelten….. Er is één stof die wel staal kan doen smelten en dat is (nano) thermiet…… Kortom de Twin Towers en WTC 7
werden middels gecontroleerde explosies neergehaald, niet door de
inslag van de ‘vliegtuigen’ en de brandende kerosine, zoals de overheids rapporten iedereen willen laten geloven…..

Er
blijven nogal wat vragen en opmerkingen over, waarvan de meest
belangrijke wellicht de volgende punten/vragen:

-Ten
eerste: het ging om vliegtuigen die van buiten de VS kwamen,
derhalve was er niet veel brandstof meer over in die vliegtuigen (als
men gelooft dat brandende kerosine het staal heeft doen smelten).

-Ten
tweede: voortgaand op het eerste punt >> zoals gezegd, staal kan niet smelten
door brandende kerosine (aangeduid als ‘jet fuel’), zoals de officiële lezing luidt.

-Ten
derde: hoe kan een toren instorten als de oorzaak daarvoor bijna
bovenin de toren plaatsvindt? (immers logisch zou zijn dat de basis
van de toren zwaar beschadigd moet zijn om iets dergelijks mogelijk
te maken).

-Ten
vierde: voordat de torens instortten werden er trillingen op de
schaal van Richter gemeten (> 2 op de schaal van Richter), ofwel deze trillingen in de bodem vonden
al plaats voordat de torens daadwerkelijk neerkwamen (met een
ongelofelijke klap), trillingen veroorzaakt door enorme explosies, zie wat dat betreft: ‘Waarheid 9/11 Kritische analyse van de aanslagen‘. (naar benden scrollen tot: ‘Seismografische data Twin Towers’)

De
volgende video van Brasscheck TV brengt nog meer duidelijkheid over
de leugens aangaande de 9/11 aanslagen in de officiële rapporten:

Thermite
and 9/11

HOW
DO YOU MELT STEEL?

INTRODUCING
NANO-THERMITE

How
do you melt steel?

#1
– You cannot do it with burning jet fuel

#2
– You can do it with nano-thermite

The
most detailed explanation you will see.

The
investigation ignored the presence of thermite.

News
media outlets like National Geographic did a “heroic” job to
prove that thermite cannot use burn steel.

Just
one problem; They were lying as usual.

An
honest human being with engineering experience conducts a common
sense experiment – and you want watch the entire process with your
own eyes.

==========================================

Zie wat betreft 9/11 ook:

Spanningen met Iran: VS geschiedenis van false flag operaties en andere manipulaties die tot oorlog hebben geleid

De rol van Israël en de VS in de 9/11 aanslagen op het WTC

9/11 forum geblokkeerd, de waarheid mag niet gezegd worden……..

9/11 getuigen totaal genegeerd door media (en overheid)

9/11 Israël nogmaals aangewezen als hulp- bij het neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC

9/11: Al Qaida tjokvol agenten van Saoedi-Arabië, VS, Israël en Egypte

9/11 voorafgegaan door CIA visa fraude…..

9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……

9/11: Palestijnen hebben niet gejuicht voor de aanslagen op de Twin Towers

9/11 eerst de explosie waarna de ‘vliegtuigen’ de Twin Towers raken

9/11: professor stelt dat WTC-gebouwen gecontroleerd zijn gesloopt, de bewijzen daarvoor zijn overweldigend

Pearl Harbor (7 december 1941) en de aanslagen van 9/11 hebben veel overeenkomsten………

9/11 de verklaring van de VS overheid aangaande het instorten van WTC gebouw 7 is vals……….

911 samenzweringstheorie wint nog meer aan geloofwaardigheid……

911, de beurs en geschiedvervalsing…….

9/11, WikiLeaks, Prism en ‘complottheorieën’

911, een ‘leuk’ feit

================================

Hier nog wat links over de ongebreidelde agressie, beter gezegd terreur van de VS:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

Terreuraanslag in Iran moet acties uitlokken die de VS tot een oorlog met Iran ‘dwingen’

9/11 getuigen totaal genegeerd door media (en overheid)

Brasscheck
TV bracht gisteren weer een video over de 9/11 aanslagen in 2001.

Hoewel
vaker ter sprake gebracht, een video over de honderden getuigen
van die aanslagen die door de reguliere (massa-) media en de overheid werden
genegeerd. Getuigen die allen precies hetzelfde vertelden: dat ze een
flink aantal explosies hoorden tijdens ‘de aanslagen’ op de Twin
Towers en WTC gebouw 7…….

Wel
geeft dit weer een nieuwe kijk op de zaak, blijkbaar werden de media
al heel snel ingeseind geen aandacht aan dergelijke getuigenissen te
geven en ‘zoals het fatsoenlijke en onafhankelijke media dan betaamd’, volg je netjes
de instructies van de overheid, je bent er immers niet om de waarheid
te vertellen, maar ‘de waarheid’ te verkondigen zoals die door de overheid wordt
aangeleverd…… 

De redactie van Brasscheck spreekt over censuur waar men het woord zelfcensuur had moeten gebruiken voor de media, die de officiële leugens als waarheid brachten en nog steeds brengen….. Immers die zogenaamde censuur wordt ook buiten deze zaak veelvuldig gehanteerd door de bedoelde media, waar ook de superrijke eigenaren-plutocraten en aandeelhouders-investeerders van die media belang hebben bij volgzame media, die vooral hun belangen moeten behartigen…..

Zoals
we deze praktijken al zo vaak hebben gezien, neem alleen al de
illegale oorlogen van de VS tegen Irak, Libië en Syrië, waaraan
voorafgaand en tijdens die oorlogen de ene leugen na de andere werd en wordt gelanceerd, waar de media deze leugens hebben uitgedragen en uitdragen als was het via een grondig
onderzoek verkregen informatie……. Moet je nagaan, diezelfde media
hebben de bek vol van ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws) op de sociale media….. ha! ha! ha!
ha! ha! ha! ha!

Men spreekt ook in de reguliere media en politiek over complottheorieën als men het over dit soort berichten heeft, terwijl de echte complottheorie aangaande 9/11 door de VS overheid werd gelanceerd! (en zoals gezegd herhaald door de reguliere westerse media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici) Voor het feit dat 9/11 minstens door de VS zelf werd geregisseerd en het officiële verhaal een vette leugen is, liggen intussen meters aan dossiers, zie o.a. de links onderaan dit bericht.

9/11
eye witnesses ignored

The
news media was fascinated by 9/11.

But
they didn’t like the eye witness accounts of multiple explosions that
day.

So
they made them all go away – but we kept them.

WHAT
THE REAL 9/11 WITNESSES SAW AND HEARD

CENSORED
AND SILENCED

TOTAL FAILURE BY THE NEWS MEDIA


On
9/11, the news media did an epic job of NOT following up on the
hundreds of eyewitnesses who clearly stated they heard numerous
explosions.

How
do you do that?

How
do you ignore eyewitnesses to things like explosions?

You
do it when you want to kill millions of people, when you want to go
to war for oil.

===================================

Zie wat betreft 9/11 ook:

Spanningen met Iran: VS geschiedenis van false flag operaties en andere manipulaties die tot oorlog hebben geleid

De rol van Israël en de VS in de 9/11 aanslagen op het WTC

9/11 forum geblokkeerd, de waarheid mag niet gezegd worden……..

9/11: de leugens over smeltend staal van de Twin Towers

9/11 Israël nogmaals aangewezen als hulp- bij het neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC

9/11: Al Qaida tjokvol agenten van Saoedi-Arabië, VS, Israël en Egypte

9/11 voorafgegaan door CIA visa fraude…..

9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……

9/11: Palestijnen hebben niet gejuicht voor de aanslagen op de Twin Towers

9/11 eerst de explosie waarna de ‘vliegtuigen’ de Twin Towers raken

9/11: professor stelt dat WTC-gebouwen gecontroleerd zijn gesloopt, de bewijzen daarvoor zijn overweldigend

Pearl Harbor (7 december 1941) en de aanslagen van 9/11 hebben veel overeenkomsten………

9/11 de verklaring van de VS overheid aangaande het instorten van WTC gebouw 7 is vals……….

911 samenzweringstheorie wint nog meer aan geloofwaardigheid……

911, de beurs en geschiedvervalsing…….

9/11, WikiLeaks, Prism en ‘complottheorieën’

911, een ‘leuk’ feit

Hier nog wat links over de ongebreidelde agressie, beter gezegd terreur van de VS:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

9/11 Israël nogmaals aangewezen als hulp- bij het neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC

In
een video besteedt Brasscheck TV nogmaals aandacht aan de aanslagen van 9/11, waar nu vooral de rol van Israël wordt belicht bij het neerhalen van het WTC in 2001. Nu blijkt dat de 91ste
verdieping van het WTC werd gehuurd door ‘Israëlische kunststudenten’, die zich Gelatin noemden, van wie later werd vastgesteld dat zich leden van de
Mossad en het Israëlische leger onder die studenten bevonden, aldus
de DEA…..

Onder de Mossad agenten zouden zich ook bomexperts hebben bevonden en ‘vreemd genoeg’ zijn er op foto’s genomen op die 91ste verdieping, een groot aantal dozen met ontstekers (BB 18) te zien van de firma Littelfuse…….

In
het bijschrift stelt de Brasscheck redactie dat een VS team nooit de
gebouwen zou hebben kunnen ondermijnen, daar ze zouden weten dat een
groot aantal VS burgers om zou komen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!
ha! Wat een naïviteit, er zijn meer dan voldoende VS psychopaten te
vinden die met een beroep op het landsbelang desnoods een kernbom tot
ontploffing willen brengen op het grondgebied van de VS……

Het
is wel duidelijk dat deze Mossad agenten zich ook hebben beziggehouden met de ondermijning van de Twin Towers en wellicht WTC 7, echter er moet enorm veel werk zijn verzet en het lijkt me zeer onwaarschijnlijk dat daar geen VS specialisten en bedrijven bij betrokken zijn geweest…… Mochten er toch vliegtuigen betrokken zijn geweest bij het neerhalen van de torens, waar men zwaar aan twijfelt*, was de Mossad kennis van bijvoorbeeld Saoedische terroristen van groot belang en het zou voor de Mossad totaal geen probleem zijn deze figuren te rekruteren…….

Zie
de video en verbaas je nogmaals over het gemak waarmee de wereld
geloofde in de onschuld van de VS en andere daders die deze aanslagen
tot in de puntjes hebben voorbereid: de ondermijning van de Twin
Towers en WTC gebouw 7…… Voor de vorm werd er een

aanslag
gepleegd op het Pentagon zodat men daar alvast niet in de
verdachtenbank kon worden gezet en daarmee kon men ‘tegelijkertijd aantonen’ dat vermaledijde arabieren betrokken moeten zijn geweest bij de 9/11 aanslagen……

Who
rented the 91st floor of the World Trade Center?

‘Israeli
art students’.

Israeli
art students…some of whom the DEA later said were
Mossad agents
and Israeli military. 

THE
SIMPLE CASE FOR ISRAELI INVOLVEMENT IN 9/11

WHO
WIRED THE BUILDINGS?

SOMEONE
HAD TO

I
am a logistically minded person which is why I instantly knew the
“mastermind in a cave” story about 9/11 was utter nonsense.

The
buildings were OBVIOUSLY taken down by controlled demolition, but
here’s the logistical question:

What
American bomb experts would be so psychopathic as to be willing to
kill thousands of Americans?


Answer:
Even with plenty of cold blooded hit men running around, it’s not
going to be possible to assemble an American team – and even
attempting to recruit an American team would be dangerous because of
the likelihood of one or more recruits blowing the whistle on the
crime of the century.

So
what do you do?

The
answer is pretty simple: bring in outsiders who not only have zero
allegiance to Americans, but also have an overwhelming ideological
that in their minds overrides any morality.

Who?
French? UK? Canadian? German?

No.

None
of them would go for it.

But
Israeli true believers would.

People
who feel that “poor Israel” is under attack and its very survival
is at stake and that ANY MEANS to protect it is acceptable.

Israel
has a vast pool of such people and it would not be hard to assemble a
bomb team who have those beliefs.

Recall:
the dust was still swirling when Israel’s prime minister was on TV
gloating about how now, at last, the US would understand its pain and
join its fight.

Mission
accomplished.

If
it was a controlled demolition, and apparently it was, then the
question is: What monsters could have been hired and relied on to do
the actual wiring?

============================================

* Zie: 9/11 eerst de explosie waarna de ‘vliegtuigen’ de Twin Towers raken

Zie wat betreft 9/11 ook:

Spanningen met Iran: VS geschiedenis van false flag operaties en andere manipulaties die tot oorlog hebben geleid

De rol van Israël en de VS in de 9/11 aanslagen op het WTC

9/11 forum geblokkeerd, de waarheid mag niet gezegd worden……..

9/11: de leugens over smeltend staal van de Twin Towers

9/11 getuigen totaal genegeerd door media (en overheid)

9/11: Al Qaida tjokvol agenten van Saoedi-Arabië, VS, Israël en Egypte

9/11 voorafgegaan door CIA visa fraude…..

9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……

9/11: Palestijnen hebben niet gejuicht voor de aanslagen op de Twin Towers

9/11: professor stelt dat WTC-gebouwen gecontroleerd zijn gesloopt, de bewijzen daarvoor zijn overweldigend

Pearl Harbor (7 december 1941) en de aanslagen van 9/11 hebben veel overeenkomsten………

9/11 de verklaring van de VS overheid aangaande het instorten van WTC gebouw 7 is vals……….

911 samenzweringstheorie wint nog meer aan geloofwaardigheid……

911, de beurs en geschiedvervalsing…….

9/11, WikiLeaks, Prism en ‘complottheorieën’

911, een ‘leuk’ feit

Hier nog wat links over de ongebreidelde agressie, beter gezegd terreur van de VS (wat genoeg zegt over de ‘schroom’ van VS psychopaten slachtoffers te maken):

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht

9/11: Al Qaida tjokvol agenten van Saoedi-Arabië, VS, Israël en Egypte

Brasscheck
TV bracht een video waarin nog eens een aantal feiten over de
aanslagen op de Twin Towers de revue passeren.

Men
spreekt in deze video van de ‘strategy of tension’, zorgen voor een
fikse aanslag en de schuld bij anderen leggen, ofwel een false flag
operatie om het volk wijs te maken dat er oorlog moet worden gevoerd,
niet alleen in het belang van het militair-industrieel complex, maar
ook van de overheid en de geheime diensten, die alle drie welvaren
bij de zogenaamde oorlog tegen terreur: -de winsten van het
voornoemde complex oppompen, -het volk bang maken zodat ze alle
vertrouwen in de regering stellen dan wel houden, -haatzaaien tegen
regimes die de VS niet welgevallig zijn, -een ‘legitimatie’ om oorlog
te voeren in landen waar de VS (en de rest van het westen) helemaal
niets te zoeken heeft en tot slot -het uitbreiden van de bevoegdheden van de geheime diensten, natuurlijk aangevuld met een groter budget……… Dat laatste, flink grotere budgetten, geldt uiteraard ook voor het Pentagon.

De Brasscheck redactie vergelijkt de aanslagen van 9/11 met Operatie Gladio* en Operatie Northwoods** 


Zie
de video en laat je andermaal verbazen over het uiterst ongeloofwaardige verhaal van de VS overheid aangaande die aanslagen, het 9/11 verhaal betreffende de voorbereiding, de daders en de regie over die aanslagen…… Zo blijkt dat Al Qaida, door de VS verantwoordelijk gehouden voor de 9/11 aanslagen, destijds tjokvol geheimagenten zat uit de VS, S-A, Israël en Egypte……. 

Vergeet daarbij niet de vreselijke gevolgen van de 9/11 aanslagen voor de mensen
die het slachtoffers zijn geworden van de daarop volgende VS terreur (met hulp van NAVO landen als Nederland) in Afghanistan en Irak (intussen meer dan 2 miljoen
doden), gevolgen van dit wel heel smerige VS spel.:

9/11,
GLADIO, AND OPERATION NORTHWOODS

QUESTIONING
THE WAR ON TERROR

STRATEGY
OF TENSION”

The
facts are still open.

The
US had a major terrorist incident on 9/11 and it’s still not clear
who was behind it.

One
thing is clear: governments are in the terror business.

On
9/11:

  • The
    physics were impossible

  • The logistics were impossible

  • The
    official story is complete BS

So
who did it?

One
thing we know for sure: al Qaeda did not have the capacity to do it.

==========================================

*  Operatie Gladio: een in 1952 bedachte operatie die het verzet organiseerde in West-Europese landen voor het geval de communisten of socialisten aan de macht zouden komen, dan wel als Rusland deze landen zou bezetten, ook onder Operatie Gladio werden terreuraanslagen gepleegd….

** Operatie Northwoods: in 1962 vatte de VS regering het plan op om terreuraanslagen in de VS te plegen en de schuld bij Cuba te leggen)

Zie wat betreft 9/11 ook:

Spanningen met Iran: VS geschiedenis van false flag operaties en andere manipulaties die tot oorlog hebben geleid

De rol van Israël en de VS in de 9/11 aanslagen op het WTC‘ 

9/11 forum geblokkeerd, de waarheid mag niet gezegd worden……..

9/11: de leugens over smeltend staal van de Twin Towers

9/11 getuigen totaal genegeerd door media (en overheid)

9/11 Israël nogmaals aangewezen als hulp- bij het neerhalen van de Twin Towers en gebouw 7 van het WTC

9/11 voorafgegaan door CIA visa fraude…..

9/11: de VS heeft niets geleerd……

9/11: Palestijnen hebben niet gejuicht voor de aanslagen op de Twin Towers

9/11 eerst de explosie waarna de ‘vliegtuigen’ de Twin Towers raken

9/11: professor stelt dat WTC-gebouwen gecontroleerd zijn gesloopt, de bewijzen daarvoor zijn overweldigend

Pearl Harbor (7 december 1941) en de aanslagen van 9/11 hebben veel overeenkomsten………

9/11 de verklaring van de VS overheid aangaande het instorten van WTC gebouw 7 is vals……….

911 samenzweringstheorie wint nog meer aan geloofwaardigheid……

911, de beurs en geschiedvervalsing…….

9/11, WikiLeaks, Prism en ‘complottheorieën’

911, een ‘leuk’ feit

Hier nog wat links over de ongebreidelde agressie, beter gezegd terreur van de VS:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

De VS, een duivels imperium, dat achter haar psychopathisch moordende troepen staat??

De war on drugs is veel dodelijker dan over het algemeen gedacht