Antifa activist Michael Reinoehl zonder enige vorm van proces geëxecuteerd door federale agenten

Precies
2 maanden voor de presidentsverkiezingen in de VS werd Michael
Reinoehl vermoord door federale agenten, die naderhand beweerden dat
Michael op hen had geschoten en daarna door hen werd neergeschoten,
dit in tegenspraak tot meerdere getuigenverklaringen…….

Volgens
deze getuigen hebben de agenten zelfs niet aangegeven wie ze waren en
volgens hen zagen deze agenten eruit als een rechtse knokploeg…..
De media namen de verklaring van de overheid zonder enige kritiek
over, tot 6 weken na de moord de New York Times onderzoek deed naar wat er echt gebeurde en men ontdekte dat Michael geen wapen in
z’n handen had (hij had een wapen in z’n broekzak en een wapen in de
auto, een geweer in een hoes……)

Alles
opgeteld is het dan ook duidelijk dat Michael willens en wetens is
vermoord, hij moest dood…… Michael werd verdacht een fascist te
hebben vermoord tijdens de Black Lives Matter (BLM) demonstraties en
was op de vlucht. Echter volgens hem handelde hij uit zelfverdediging daar de fascist op hem schoot…. Blijkbaar was men tot de conclusie
gekomen dat Michael gelijk had, maar dat hij dankzij de ophitsende
Tweets van psychopaat Trump en anderen over de dood van de fascist maar beter vermoord kon
worden, zodat hij zijn zaak niet kon bepleiten……….

Trump is
er dan ook trots op dat de federale politie Michael vermoordde,
waarbij hij de gelogen getuigenis van de federale politie gebruikt en
stelt dat hiermee is aangegeven dat Antifa activisten kunnen wachten
op nog veel meer overheidsgeweld…….. Trump heeft aangegeven dat
Antifa moet worden opgerold het is volgens hem een terroristische
organisatie…… Dat juist de tegenstanders van Antifa terreur
uitoefenen interesseert hem geen bliksem, al is dat logisch, immers hij heeft meer dan eens bewezen zelf een fascist te zijn…… De fascisten
die tegen BLM en hun demonstraties zijn, gebruiken meer en meer hun auto als wapen, sinds de demonstraties
eerder dit jaar begonnen, na de politiemoord op George Floyd, zijn er meer dan 50 incidenten genoteerd waarbij deze
fascisten met hun auto op mensen inreden……

Fox News
en de Daily Caller hebben de (illegale) standrechtelijke executie door federale agenten van Reinoehl
toegejuicht……

Aan de andere kant kunnen neonazi’s tekeergaan met wapens zonder ook maar een letter aan kritiek te krijgen van Trump en zijn psychopathisch fascistische administratie……..

Je kan
er dan ook donder op zeggen dat bij volgende BLM demonstraties nog
meer geweld zal worden gebruikt door fascisten en federale agenten
(als deze agenten weer worden ingezet….)….

The
American dream: a huge nightmare!!!

Het
volgende artikel heb ik overgenomen van CounterPunch en werd
eerder gepubliceerd op Economy for All:

October
19, 2020

In
Trump’s America, There Is Death Before Due Process

by Sonali
Kolhatkar

Photograph by Nathaniel St. Clair

The federal government’s killing
of Michael Reinoehl exactly two months before the November 3
presidential race ought to have been one of the most high-profile
election issues being discussed in America. Instead, it has been
almost forgotten save for some media outlets starting to question the
official narrative of his death. The little-known self-proclaimed
“antifa” activist was killed by federal agents on September 3.
Officers claimed that he had fired shots at them before being gunned
down. But a week after his killing, the Washington
Post
found that “the wanted man wasn’t obviously armed.”

The Thurston County sheriff in
Lacey, Washington, where the suspect was killed, released a public
statement
saying his investigation team “can confirm… that
Mr. Reinoehl pointed the handgun that he had in his possession at the
officers at the time of the shooting.” The U.S. Marshals Service
whose forces were the ones that shot Reinoehl released a similar
statement
claiming that the fugitive task force that had been
sent to his location “attempted to peacefully arrest him,” but,
after being shot at, “Task force members responded to the threat
and struck the suspect who was pronounced dead at the scene.”

News outlets took the official
statements at their word and dutifully
reported
the incident as one where a suspected killer opened fire
on officers and was fatally shot in the course of his arrest. In
other words, there was “nothing to see here.” But according to a
New
York Times investigation
six weeks after his death, it remains
unclear “whether law enforcement officers made any serious attempt
to arrest Mr. Reinoehl before killing him.”

According to nearly two dozen
witnesses that the New York Times spoke to, “all but one said they
did not hear officers identify themselves or give any commands before
opening fire.” Even though Reinoehl was armed at the time of his
death, his handgun was found in his pocket and an AR-style rifle in a
bag in his car, suggesting he did not threaten the officers trying to
arrest him as official accounts had initially claimed.

Reinoehl was wanted in connection
to the fatal shooting of a Trump-supporting right-wing activist named
Aaron
J. Danielson
during Black Lives Matter protests in Portland,
Oregon. President Donald Trump ranted on Twitter
on the day he was killed, “Why aren’t the Portland Police
ARRESTING the cold blooded killer” and adding, “Everybody knows
who this thug is.” Later he hailed the fatal shooting triumphantly,
saying
in a Fox News interview:

We sent in the U.S.
Marshals for the killer, the man who killed the young man on the
street.… Two and a half days went by, and I put out [on Twitter],
‘When are you going to go get him?’ And the U.S. Marshals went in
to get him, and they ended in a gunfight. This guy was a violent
criminal, and the U.S. Marshals killed him. And I’ll tell you
something—that’s the way it has to be. There has to be
retribution when you have crime like this.”

In referring to Reinoehl as a “cold
blooded killer” and “violent criminal” even though at the time
of his death he was a suspect, Trump made clear that in his America,
“law and order” means you are guilty before being proven so and
can be targeted for extrajudicial assassination if those in power
decide you deserve it. Such shocking words coming from any other head
of state in the world would trigger instant condemnations from the
U.S. State Department. Speaking to his supporters, Trump boasted
of the “great job” that U.S. Marshals did in Portland, adding
meaningfully, “you know what I mean.”

Attorney General William Barr, who
appears to have no understanding of how the nation’s system of
criminal justice is supposed to work, released
a statement
praising the federal troops’ actions and echoing
Trump’s words in more official-sounding language. Barr called
Reinoehl, “a dangerous fugitive, admitted Antifa member, and
suspected murderer,” and said before any investigation into the
killing was complete that “[w]hen Reinoehl attempted to escape
arrest and produced a firearm, he was shot and killed by law
enforcement officers.” In doing so, Barr too justified this
extrajudicial assassination as Trump did and went as far as calling
the whole incident, “a significant accomplishment in the ongoing
effort to restore law and order to Portland and other cities.” He
applauded “the fugitive task force team that located Reinoehl and
prevented him from escaping justice.”

To Barr, the top law enforcement
official in the nation, “justice” meant death, rather than arrest
followed by charges and a fair trial. To Barr and Trump, the constant
drumbeat of “law and order” is essentially a promise to fatally
punish those perceived as enemies of the government.

In addition to the Washington Post
and the New York Times, several other media outlets have corroborated
that Reinoehl’s killing appeared unjustified. Rolling
Stone
characterizes one eyewitness’s account of the scene as “a
violent ambush” that “resembled an execution.” Oregon
Public Broadcasting in collaboration with ProPublica
spoke to
witnesses who said that the officers shot him without warning and
“looked less like law enforcement officers than members of a
right-wing militia.”

In a VICE
News interview
released just after his death, Reinoehl can be
seen claiming that he acted in self-defense in Portland—just as an
attorney for Kyle
Rittenhouse
, the Trump-supporting armed suspect in the Kenosha,
Wisconsin, killing of two Black Lives Matter activists, said. With
Reinoehl dead at the hands of U.S. Marshals, we will never know the
truth.

Instead, Reinoehl now serves as the
perfect symbol of the shadowy enemy that Trump rails against. A
participant in Black Lives Matter protests, Reinoehl claimed
he was “100% ANTIFA all the way.” The president’s promise
to designate “ANTIFA” (which is an ideology, not an organization)
as “a Terrorist Organization” has fed into dangerous notions
designed to create panic among his base. It has raised the specter of
“violent
mobs”
terrorizing communities that only swift government action
of the sort aimed at Reinoehl can quell.

But who are the “violent mobs”
really? In Trump’s world, armed self-defense is acceptable only for
white supremacists who support him, not for the left-wing activists
they routinely threaten and hurt. Since protests began earlier this
year, according to NPR,
“Right-wing extremists are turning cars into weapons, with reports
of at least 50 vehicle-ramming incidents” at protests against
police brutality. Conservative news outlets including Fox News and
the Daily Caller have encouraged such attacks. Even the Department of
Homeland Security’s latest
threat assessment
identifies, “racially and ethnically
motivated violent extremists—specifically white supremacist
extremists,” as “the most persistent and lethal threat in the
Homeland” among what the agency designates as “Domestic Violent
Extremists” or DVEs.

As if to underscore the threat,
more than a dozen white men were
just arrested
(without being harmed) in connection with a
kidnapping plot aimed at Michigan’s Governor Gretchen Whitmer. The
governor, who is among several women who have faced
Trump’s online ire
, said,
“I do believe that there are still serious threats that groups like
this group, these domestic terrorists, are finding comfort and
support in the rhetoric coming out of Republican leadership in the
White House to our state house.”

In Trump’s America, white
nationalist armed vigilante men reign supreme while those of us
speaking out against fascism are symbolized by Reinoehl—and like
him will be not be considered innocent until proven guilty. We will
never know whether or not Reinoehl was guilty of murdering Danielson,
as he was not given a chance to stand trial. In Trump’s America,
there will be no law, only order. To Trump, “[t]here has to be
retribution,” rather than due process. Among the many issues at
stake in the November 3 election, this ought to be a central concern.

This article was produced by
Economy
for All
, a project of the Independent Media Institute.

Sonali Kolhatkar
is the founder, host and executive producer of “Rising Up With
Sonali,” a television and radio show that airs on Free Speech TV
(Dish Network, DirecTV, Roku) and Pacifica stations KPFK, KPFA, and
affiliates. 

==========================

Voor meer berichten over BLM, Antifa en/of politie VS, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.

Jonge vrouw van 19 kreeg doodstraf opgelegd voor ‘moord’ op haar verkrachter… Lees en teken ajb de petitie voor haar vrijlating

Mensen van sommige berichten wordt je
letterlijk kotsmisselijk, zoals het volgende: Noura Hussein, een jonge
Soedanese vrouw van 19, die tegen haar zin werd
gedwongen te trouwen, werd door ‘haar echtgenoot’ verkracht terwijl
ze werd vastgehouden door familieleden van de psychopaat die haar
verkrachtte……..

De volgende keer dat haar zogenaamde
man probeerde haar weer te verkrachten, heeft ze hem gedood….. De
rechter oordeelde dat dit een moord was en veroordeelde haar tot dood
door verhanging……… Uit zelfverdediging tegen één van de
vreselijkste martelingen iemand ombrengen en dan durft een rechter te
zeggen dat dit moord is…….

Mensen, lees de volgende tekst en teken
ajb de petitie van het Care2 Team voor haar vrijlating en geeft het door! Hoe meer
mensen meedoen hoe beter, wellicht dat men dan eindelijk de meer dan
belachelijke en kromme wetgeving op Soedan zal bijstellen!

Demand
justice for Noura Hussein, who is sentenced to death for killing her
rapist in self defence.

Content
warning: this story contains descriptions of rape.

Noura
Hussein, 19, was raped by the man she was forced to marry in
Sudan. Three of his relatives pinned her down whilst her husband
forced himself on her.
 The
next time he tried to rape her, she fought back and killed him in
self defence. Last week, she was sentenced to death by hanging for
murder. 
Her
lawyers have 7 days left to appeal.


Take
action: sign the petition to demand justice for Noura.


Badr
Eldin Salah, an activist from the Afrika Youth Movement who was in
the court says, “Noura’s lawyers say they plan to appeal against
the decision, but 
we
also need strong international support
 from
organisations such as the African Union, the United Nations and the
European Union to support her.”


Marital
rape and child marriage are not considered crimes in Sudan.
 But
as Equality Now’s Global Director Yasmeen Hassan says,
“Criminalisation of Noura for defending herself from assault
and, in particular a death sentence, would violate her rights under
the Sudanese Constitution and international law.”


Please
sign now to show your support for Noura.
 If
there is enough international outcry, we can show the Sudanese courts
that they must revoke her death sentence and hopefully we can
save her life.

Thank
you,


Beth
G.
The Care2 Petitions Team

P.S.
Nobody should be punished for defending themselves from rape. 
ign
now and demand justice for Noura!

Justice
For Noura Hussein, The Girl Who Is Sentenced To Death For Killing Her
Rapist.

Noura
Hussein, 19, was told she would be hanged after a Sharia court
convicted her of premeditated murder of her husband who she had been
forced to marry.

A
teenage bride has been sentenced to death for killing her husband who
raped her as male relatives pinned her down.

Noura
Hussein, 19, says her father made her marry the man – who was also
her cousin – when she was 16, but she refused to accept the union and
sought refuge with a relative for three years. She returned to her
family home on the outskirts of the Sudanese capital Khartoum in
April this year after her father said the marriage was cancelled. But
she found that she had been duped and preparations for her wedding
ceremony were under way.

Hussein
said that she refused to have sex with her husband after the
ceremony, but on the sixth day, he raped her as three of his male
relatives held her down to restrain her. 
The
following day, he attempted to rape her again and as she struggled to
stop him, she stabbed him, killing him. A Sharia court, which follows
Islamic religious law, found Hussein guilty of premeditated murder
last month and on Thursday officially sentenced her to death by
hanging.
 Her
lawyers have 15 days to appeal.

“Under
Sharia law, the husband’s family can demand either monetary
compensation or death. They chose death and now the death penalty has
been handed down,” said Badr Eldin Salah, an activist from the
Afrika Youth Movement who was in the court.

“Noura’s
lawyers say they plan to appeal against the decision, but 
we
also need strong international support
 from
organisations such as the African Union, the United Nations and the
European Union to support her.”

Sudan
is ranked 165 out of 188 countries on the UN’s Gender Inequality
Index, which measures how women fare compared to men when it comes to
access to health, education, political participation and employment
opportunities. UN Women says violence against women and girls is
considered prevalent. 


The country has not signed the Convention on
the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women and has
weak policies in place to protect them. 
Marital
rape and child marriage, for example, are not considered crimes in
the predominately Muslim African nation. 
Sudanese
law allows for the marriage of a girl once she hits puberty. It also
says a 10-year-old girl can be married by their guardian with the
permission of a judge. One in three Sudanese women are married before
the age of 18, says UN Women.


Campaign
groups such as Equality Now say they are writing to Sudanese
President Omar al-Bashir to plead for clemency, arguing that the
judgement is against the Sudanese constitution.

“Noura
is a victim, not a criminal, and should be treated as such.
 In
many countries, victims like Noura would be provided services to
ensure that they overcome the trauma of their experiences,” said
Equality Now’s Global Director Yasmeen Hassan.

“Criminalisation
of Noura for defending herself from assault and, in particular a
death sentence, would violate her rights under the Sudanese
Constitution and international law.”

Please sign now to
show your support for Noura. If enough people sign, we can show the
Sudanese courts that they must revoke her death sentence and
hopefully we can save her life.

Charlottesville: twee schuldigen? Of is het de taak van eenieder te vechten tegen fascisme?

Sinds de gebeurtenissen in Charlottesville, waar een fascist een jonge vrouw vermoordde en andere neonazi’s met wapens en knuppels tekeergingen, is er een discussie losgebarsten waarin ook linkse antifascisten* (Antifa) verantwoordelijk worden gesteld voor het geweld…….. Terwijl je kan stellen dat zij zich zelf en andere demonstranten verdedigden tegen het fascistische geteisem, dat zelfs met wapens rondliep in Charlottesville……..

Die antifascisten, o.a. door Clinton cs aangeduid als ‘alt-left’ (dit al tijdens de voorverkiezingen van het presidentschap in de VS vorig jaar), bevechten terecht het fascisme, waarbij ze tot nu toe niet  één dodelijk slachtoffer hebben gemaakt, dit i.t.t. tot de neonazi’s die vanaf het jaar 2000 tot 2016 in de VS al 49 mensen hebben vermoord …….

Na WOII zou het de taak van eenieder moeten zijn, zich te verzetten tegen het opnieuw opkomende fascisme………

Bent u van mening, dat links schuld heeft aan de gebeurtenissen in Charlottesville, dan raad ik ook u aan, de hieronder opgenomen video te bekijken. Onder het begeleidende artikel kan u klikken voor een vertaling:

This
Vice News Documentary from Charlottesville Is Horrifying

Watch
it and share it.

By
Jack Holmes

August
16, 2017 “Information
Clearing House
” – Hundreds of white
supremacists 
marched
with torches in an American city Friday night
.
They arrived the next day brandishing weapons and armor. One white
supremacist 
allegedly
murdered an anti-racist protester
 in
the street with his car and injured several others. This is what
really happened when you peel back all the rhetoric flying in the
aftermath, and after you tune out the first reprehensible response
from the President of the United States, and his subsequent update to
it 
that
was two days late and a dollar short
.


Vice News, to the outlet’s immense credit, was on the ground to document the events in Charlottesville this weekend. Reporter Elle Reeve even embedded, for a time, with white supremacist leader Chris Cantwell. What she found speaks for itself, but keep an eye out for the little things. Like, say, how many guns these white supremacists have

The
question before us is obvious. Is this the country we’ve built for
ourselves? And can we allow it to continue this way?


Click
for
 SpanishGermanDutchDanishFrench,
translation- Note- 
Translation
may take a moment to load.

==============================

* Bestaan er eigenlijk nog rechtse antifascisten?

Zie ook:

Before Trump, Clinton Democrats Invoked the Term ‘Alt-Left’ to Demonize Critics

Among the Racists‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)

Neonazi
terreuraanslag in VS, westerse media spreken ‘op hun best’ over ‘een
daad van agressie……’

Charlottesville:
Trump haalt antifascisten toch onderuit………

Charlottesville: twee schuldigen? Of is het de taak van eenieder te vechten tegen fascisme?

Charlottesville: wat er fout ging voor de verzamelde gewelddadige en bewapende fascisten……….

De evolutie van politiestaat VS o.a. te zien in het buitenspel zetten van burgerrechten in steden als Boston en Charlottesville

Fred Teeven en zelfverdediging

De lompe hufter Teeven was gisteravond bij Pauw en Witteman om te spreken over het recht op zelfverdediging, een recht dat er al is, maar het is een lekker onderwerp voor het bruin-populistische-kabinet waar Teeven deel van uitmaakt. Op de vraag van Witteman, wat er gebeurd als je achter een inbreker aangaat met een honkbalknuppel en je slaat hem neer antwoordt de VVD knuppel Teeven, de staatssecretaris voor Veiligheid en Justitie, dat je in tegenstelling tot nu toe, dan niet gearresteerd wordt, maar er wel een justitieel onderzoek volgt. 

Dat is dus het verschil, als je achter een inbreker aangaat, ben je niet meer in levensgevaar, en is er dus ook van zelfverdediging geen sprake. Het argument, dat als je deze regel heel zwaar laat wegen, de inbrekers dan waarschijnlijk tijdens een inbraak veel meer geweld gaan gebruiken, pareert deze lamlul door het om te draaien:  die inbreker bedenkt zich wel twee keer voor hij gaat inbreken. Ja zak, dat zie je in de VS, een gigantisch aantal geweldsmisdrijven, laten we meteen een wet aannemen, dat iedereen gewapend mag rondlopen in dit land. Jezus wat een lul!