Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Big
Brother, ofwel deepstate, inclusief media en politiek, zorgt ervoor
dat de burgers in de VS nog het meest begaan zijn met de invasies van
de VS elders, illegale invasies, het begin van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert tegen landen waar het niets, maar dan ook helemaal niets te
zoeken heeft.

De
enorme berg leugens die de VS al heeft gebruikt om haar
grootschalige terreur te legitimeren, wordt er als het ware door de
reguliere massamedia ingestampt bij de bevolking….. Het gaat
intussen al zover dat er een ‘feitenchecker’* is ingesteld, te weten
Politifact, dat is een platform waar veel VS burgers ‘hun licht opsteken’ over het
gaande nieuws. Wat die burgers niet weten is dat die ‘feitenchecker’ in feite is geïnstalleerd om de leugens in de reguliere media, van meer
gewicht te voorzien, zodat iedereen die leugens gelooft en blijft geloven……

Voor
alle leugens over de illegale VS oorlogen die de reguliere media
brachten over Afghanistan, Irak, Libië en Syrië, heeft bij mijn weten niet één
mediaorgaan een rectificatie gemaakt, alsof het de normaalste zaak is
te blijven liegen en dat over oorlogen waarin alleen deze eeuw al 2,5 miljoen mensen werden vermoord…… Het is dan ook niet vreemd dat miljoenen in
de VS en de EU nog steeds geloven dat Saddam Hoessein
massavernietigingswapens had, terwijl dat aantoonbaar niet zo
was….. 

Het smerige is dat met een beetje ‘geluk’ deze leugens in de
geschiedenisboeken worden opgenomen, waar al een fiks aantal leugens is te vinden (neem bijvoorbeeld nogmaals de leugens over de
aanvallen van de VS en haar oorlogshond de NAVO op Afghanistan, Irak,
Libië en Syrië….)

Eric
Zuesse heeft een artikel over o.a. het voorgaande geplaatst op Strategic
Culture Foundation, waarin hij uitgebreid op deze zaak ingaat. De VS
als politieagent van de wereld, i.p.v. de werkelijkheid waarin de VS
de grootste terreurentiteit op onze kleine aarde is en waar deze
vereniging van terreurstaten sinds WOII al meer dan 22,5 miljoen
mensen heeft vermoord………

Voorts
wijst Zuesse op de VN, een orgaan dat VS president Roosevelt
(overigens ook een oorlogsmisdadiger) graag installeerde, waar hij
dit orgaan zag als een toekomstige onafhankelijke wereldmacht en niet
een door een staat als de VS geleid orgaan, dat overal waar het haar
uitkomt een oorlog begint en waar een niet volgzame houding t.o.v. de VS al voldoende is,
om als land in de gevarenzone te komen………

Niet
voor niets ook dat Zuesse Oekraïne aanhaalt en de enorme leugens die
daarover al zijn geventileerd, waar het zeker is dat de VS ingreep
met een door de CIA georganiseerde opstand (op initiatief van Hillary Clinton, destijds minister van BuZa in de VS), die moest eindigen in de
coup tegen de democratisch gekozen regering Janoekovytsj, alleen
omdat deze regering vriendschappelijke banden had met Rusland…….. (de kosten voor deze operaties in Oekraïne hebben de VS belastingbetalers maar liefst 4 miljard dollar gekost…..) Voorts kon daarmee de gaslevering van Rusland aan West-Europa worden
getorpedeerd, zodat dit deel van Europa haar gas in de VS zou gaan
kopen…….. 

Vandaar ook dat de achterlijke boerenlul
Hoekstra, VS ambassadeur in Nederland en kopstukken in de VS (waaronder Trump) een grote bek hebben tegen de EU over het door laten gaan van Nord
Stream 2 (NS2), waarmee Russisch gas via een pijpleiding door de
Oostzee richting Duitsland zal worden vervoerd…… Er gaan zelfs
stemmen op in de VS om de EU en dan m.n. Duitsland daarvoor te straffen…….

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor pete hoekstra

Pete Hoekstra, VS ambassadeur in Nederland, met zijn typische ‘intelligente blik’

Dan dien ik nog op te merken, dat de titel de lading niet dekt,, immers ook wij worden dagelijks voorgelogen en dat over dezelfde grootschalige westerse terreur in gebieden als het Midden-Oosten, dit o.l.v. de VS, terreur die door de reguliere media, ook in ons land, wordt voorgesteld alsof we daar liefdewerk doen…….

Zuesse merkt verder op dat het militair-industrieel complex oorlogen nodig heeft (oké, een open deur), ofwel de VS heeft vijanden nodig zodat de winsten van de wapenindustrie, inclusief die voor rollend, varend en vliegend oorlogstuig, kunnen blijven groeien……. Uiteraard is het dan nodig dat het volk achter deze illegale oorlogen van de VS staat en daar ligt ‘een mooie taak’ voor de ‘onafhankelijke’ reguliere massamedia, die hun werk uitermate grondig doen: het hersenspoelen van de VS burgers en hen opzetten tegen de ‘vijanden’ van de VS, die zogenaamd een gevaar vormen voor de staatsveiligheid van de VS…….. (of men stelt gewoon dat een bepaald land zoals eerder Irak [en Noord-Korea] de wil en de middelen heeft om de VS direct aan te vallen; te belachelijk voor woorden, zoals je begrijpt)

Lees het
artikel van Zuesse en geeft het door, tijd dat men ontwaakt uit de
consucoma en de hersenspoelstand van de reguliere media!

How
Big Brother Grips Americans’ Minds to Support Invasions

How Big Brother Grips Americans’ Minds to Support Invasions

ERIC
ZUESSE
 |
08.12.2018 | 
WORLD AMERICAS

On
November 29th, Gallup headlined 
“Democrats
Lead Surge in Belief U.S. Should Be World Leader”
 and
reported that “Three-fourths (75%) of Americans today think the
United States has ‘a special responsibility to be the leading
nation in world affairs,’ up from 66% in 2010. The surge is driven
by Democrats, whose belief in this idea has increased from 61% eight
years ago to 81% now.” This finding comes even after the lie-based
and catastrophic U.S. invasions of Iraq in 2003, and of Libya in 2011
(and of so many others, such as Afghanistan, where the U.S. and
Sauds 
created
the Taliban in 1979
).
Americans — now even increasingly — want ‘their’ (which
is 
actually
America’s billionaires’
)
Government to be virtually the world’s government, policing the
world. They want this nation’s Government to be determining what
international laws will be enforced around the world, and to be
enforcing them. Most Americans don’t want the United Nations to
have power over the U.S. (its 
billionaires’)
Government, but instead want the U.S. Government (its billionaires)
to have power over the United Nations (which didn’t authorize any
of those evil, lie-based, U.S. invasions). 

Not
only would doing this bankrupt all constructive domestic functions
(health, education, infrastructure, etc.) of the U.S. federal
Government, but it would also increase the global carnage, as if the
U.S. Government hasn’t already been doing enough of that, for
decades now.

The
leadership for this supremacist craving comes straight from America’s
top, not from the masses that are being sampled by the Gallup
organization, who only reflect it — they are duped by their
leaders. Here is how U.S. President Barack Obama (a Nobel Peace Prize
winner in 2009, for 
nothing
at all
 but
his 
‘kindly’
but insincere verbiage
 when
he had been a candidate) stated this widespread delusional American
belief in American global moral supremacy, when addressing the
graduating class at West Point Military Academy, on 28 May 2014: 

The
United States is and remains the one indispensable
nation. [
Every
other nation is therefore ‘dispensable’; we therefore now have
“Amerika, Amerika über alles, über alles in der Welt”.] 
That
has been true for the century passed and it will be true for the
century to come. … America must always lead on the world stage.

This
had certainly not been the objective of U.S. President
Franklin Delano Roosevelt when he set up the U.N. just before his
death in 1945; he instead wanted the U.N. to evolve into a democratic
government of the world, with elected representatives of each and
every one of the world’s governments — to evolve into
becoming 
the
global international republic
 —
regardless of whether or not the U.S. Government approves or
disapproves of another nation’s government. The idea on which the
U.N. was founded was not to involve the U.S. Government in the
internal affairs of other nations, not to be the judge jury and
executioner of other governments that it doesn’t like, nor to
dictate what other nations should or should not do within the given
nation’s boundaries. FDR intended that there instead be
democratically represented, at the U.N., each and every nation, and
each and every people within that global government, where each of
these national governments is (hopefully but not necessarily) a
democracy. 
FDR
was just as opposed to dictatorship internationally, as he was
opposed to dictatorship nationally
,
and he recognized that inevitably some governments will disapprove of
other governments, but he was deeply committed to the view that a
need exists for laws and law-enforcement
between nations,
on an international level, and not only 
within the
individual nations, and that each nation is sacrosanct on its own
internal laws. He respected national sovereignty, and opposed
international empire. (This was his basic disagreement with Winston
Churchill, then, and with American leaders such as Obama and Trump
now.) Unlike President Obama (and evidently unlike the vast majority
of today’s Americans) FDR didn’t want this international
government to be an American function, but instead an entirely
separate international governmental function, in which there is no
international dictatorship whatsoever — not American, and not by
any other country. He knew that 
this
is the only stable basis for international peace, and for avoiding a
world-annihilating World War III

Barack
Obama rejected FDR’s vision, and advocated for the United
States as being (and even as if it already had been for a century)
virtually the government over the entire world, which “must always
lead on the world stage.” Adolf Hitler had had that very same
international vision for his own country, Germany, “the
Thousand-Year Reich,” but he lost World War II; and, then, when FDR
died, Hitler’s vision increasingly took over iHoen America, so
that 
ideologically, FDR
actually lost WW II, when Harry S. Truman took over the White House
and increasingly thereafter, until today, when 
the
U.S. commits more invasions of foreign countries than do all other
nations in the world combined
.
Americans (apparently, as shown in this and other polls) 
like this,
and want more of it.
Nobody
else does.
 For
example, nobody (except the U.S. and Saudi and Israeli aristocracies
and their supporters worldwide, which are very few people) supports
the U.S. regime’s reinstitution of sanctions against Iran, which
the U.S. regime is imposing as the global dictator. America’s
economic sanctions are like spitting into the face of FDR, who had
opposed such imperialistic fascism in the more overtly military form
when Hitler’s regime was imposing it. It’s also spitting at the
U.N.

This
latest Gallup finding displays an increase, but nothing that’s at
all anomalous as compared to the decades-long reality of
imperialistic U.S. culture. 
For
decades now, Gallup’s polling has shown that the most respected of
all institutions by the American people is the nation’s military
 —
more than the church, more than the Presidency, more than the U.S.
Supreme Court, more than the press, more than the schools, more than
anything. America is invasion-nation. This is true 
even
after
 the
2003 invasion of Iraq on the basis of 
blatant
lies
,
which 
destroyed Iraq
— a nation that had never invaded nor even threatened to invade the
United States. The American people are, resolutely, bloodthirsty for
conquest, even after having been 
fooled into
that 
evil invasion,
and subsequent decades-long military occupation in Iraq, and
after 
subsequent conquests
or attempted conquests, in Libya, 
Syria,
Yemen, and elsewhere — all destroying nations that had never
invaded nor even threatened America. Why? How did this mass-insanity,
of evil, come to be?

How
is this aggressive nationalism even possible, in
America’s ‘
democracy’? It’s actually
no democracy at all
,
and the public are being constantly fooled to think that it is a
democracy, and this deception is essential in order for the public to
tolerate this Government, and to tolerate the media that lie for it.
This widespread deceit requires 
constant
cooperation of the ‘news’-media
 —
and these are the same ‘news’-media that 
hid
from the public, in 2002, that the U.S. Government was outright lying
about “WMD in Iraq.”

The
public simply do not learn. That’s a tragic fact. Largely, this
fact results from reality being hidden by the ‘news’-media; but,
even now, long after the fake ‘news’ in 2002, about the U.S.
regime’s having possessed secret and conclusive evidence of
“Saddam’s WMD,” the published ‘history’ about that invasion
still does not acknowledge the public’s having been lied-to at that
time, by its Government, and by the ‘news’-media. So,
the public live, and culturally swim, in 
an
ongoing river of lies
,
both as its being ‘news’, and subsequently as its having been
‘history’. This is why the public do not learn: they are being
constantly deceived. And they (as Gallup’s polls
prove) tolerate being constantly deceived. The public do not
rebel against it. They don’t reject either the politicians, or the
‘news’-media. They don’t demand that the American public
control the American Government and that America’s billionaires
lose that control — especially over the ‘news’-media.

Honesty
is no longer an operative American value, if it ever was. That’s
how, and why, Big Brother (the operation by the
international-corporate billionaires) grips Americans’ minds to
support foreign Invasions. Americans support liars, and it all comes
from the top; it’s directed from the top. It is bipartisan, from
both Democratic Party billionaires and Republican Party
billionaires. 
National
politicians will lose their seats if they disobey.

A
good example, of this Big-Brother operation, is America’s
Politifact, the online site which is at America’s crossover where
‘news’ and ‘history’ meet one-another. It’s controlled by
billionaires 
such
as
 the
one who founded 
Craigslist.
Millions of Americans go to Politifact in order to determine what is
true and what is false that is being widely published about current
events. The present writer sometimes links to their articles, where I
have independently verified that there are no misrepresentations in
an article. But, like the ‘news’-media that it judges, Politifact
is also a propaganda-agency for 
the
(U.S.-Saud-Israeli) Deep State
,
and so it deceives on the most critically important international
matters. An example of this occurred right after 
the
U.S. regime had overthrown in February 2014 in a bloody coup the
democratically elected Government of Ukraine, and replaced it by a
rabidly anti-Russian racist fascist or nazi Government on Russia’s
doorstep, a regime that was selected by the rabidly anti-Russian (but
lying that it wasn’t) Obama regime
.
This Politifact article was dated 31 March 2014, right after over 90%
of Crimeans had just voted in a referendum, to rejoin Russia, and to
depart from Ukraine, which the Soviet dictator had transferred them
to, separating them from Russia, in 1954. (None of that history of
the matter was even mentioned by Politifact.) The Politifact article
was titled 
“Viral
meme says United States has ‘invaded’ 22 countries in the past 20
years”
,
and it was designed to deceive readers into believing that “Russia’s
recent annexation of Crimea” reflected the real instance of
“invasion” that Americans should be outraged against — to
deflect away from America’s recent history as being the world’s
actual invasion-nation. This propaganda-article said nothing at all
about either Crimea or Ukraine except in its opening line: “A
Facebook meme argues that Americans are pretty two-faced when it
comes to Russia’s recent annexation of Crimea.” It then proceeded
to document that the exact number of American invasions during the
prior 20 years wasn’t 22, and so Politifact declared the allegation
“false” (as if the exact number were really the entire issue or
even the main one, and as if America’s scandalous recent history of
invasions were not).

So,
it’s on account of such drowning-in-propaganda, that the U.S.
public not only respect what U.S. President Dwight Eisenhower
derogatorily called the “military-industrial complex,” but
respect it above even the U.S. Presidency itself, and above all other
U.S. institutions (as Gallup’s constant polling demonstrates to be
the case).

Here’s
the reality: The same group of no more than a thousand super-wealthy
Americans control both the United States Government and the
weapons-manufacturing firms (such as Lockheed Martin), which are
the 
only
corporations whose only customers are the U.S. Government and its
chosen allied governments
.
So, these few people actually control the U.S. Government’s foreign
relations, and foreign policies. They create and control their own
markets. This is the most politically active group of America’s
super-rich, because they own America’s international corporations
and because their business as owners of the military ones is military
policy and also diplomatic policy, including the conjoining of both
of those at the CIA and NSA, including the many coups that they (via
their Government) engineer. They also 
control
all of the nation’s major news-media, which report international
affairs in such a manner as to determine which foreign governments
will be perceived by the mass of Americans to constitute the nation’s
‘enemies’ and therefore to be suitable targets for the U.S.
military and CIA to invade and conquer or otherwise “regime-change”
 —
such as have been the lands of North Vietnam, Afghanistan, Iraq,
Libya, Syria, Iran, North Korea, Yemen, Venezuela, etc., at various
times. 
The
weapons-manufacturers won’t have any markets, at all, if there are
no ‘enemy’ nations that are deemed by the public to be suitable
targets for their weapons
. ‘Enemy’
nations, and not only ‘allies’ (or ‘allied’ nations), are
necessary, in order for the military business to produce the most
profits. Overwhelmingly, if not totally, the chosen ‘enemies’ are
nations that have 
never
invaded nor even threatened to invade the United States
;
and, so, in order to keep this Government-funded business (the
war-profiteering and associated international 
natural-resources
extractions 
businesses)
growing and thriving, what’s essential is continuing control over
the nation’s ‘news’-media. As Walter Lippmann wrote in
1921, 
“the
manufacture of consent”
 is
an essential part of this entire operation. It happens via the media.
Even Germany’s Nazis needed to do that. Any modern capitalist
dictatorship (otherwise called “fascism”) does. The U.S. regime,
being a capitalist dictatorship, certainly does. Physically, Hitler
lost, but his ideology won, he won even as nazism (racist fascism)
instead of merely as fascism, and this racism is shown because the
U.S. regime is rabidly racist anti-Russian (
not
merely anti-communist
),
and has been so for at least a century. (Maybe it’s what Obama
actually had secretly in mind when he said “That has been true for
the century passed and it will be true for the century to come.”
And Trump is no less a liar than Obama, and he continues this aim of
ultimately conquering Russia.) They say they’re only against
Russia’s leader Vladimir Putin, but Putin shows in all polls of
Russians, even in non-Russian polls, to be far more favorably viewed
by Russians than either Barack Obama or Donald Trump are viewed by
Americans. This is why regime-change-in-Russia is increasingly
becoming dominated by U.S. economic sanctions and military, and less
dominated by CIA and other coup-organizers. The actual dictatorship
is in America, and it requires participation by its
‘news’-media. 
Demonizing
‘the enemy’
 is
therefore crucial. It is crucial preparation for any invasion.

The
United States Government spends 
at
least as much money on its military as do all of the other
governments in the world combined
. Its
‘news’-media (that is to say, the media that are owned by, and
that are advertised in by, the corporations that are controlled by,
the same small group of billionaires — America’s billionaires —
who fund the political campaigns of both the Democratic Party’s and
the Republican Party’s nominees for the U.S. Congress and the
Presidency) may be partisan for one or the other of the nation’s
two political Parties, but they all are unitedly partisan for the
international corporations, such as Lockheed Martin, that America’s
billionaires control, and that sell only to the U.S. Government and
to the foreign governments that are allied with the U.S. Government.
They also are partisan for the U.S.-based oil and gas and mining
international corporations, which need to extract at the lowest costs
possible, no matter how much the given extractee-nation’s public
might suffer from the deal. “Three-fourths (75%) of Americans today
think the United States has ‘a special responsibility to be the
leading nation in world affairs,’” and the actual beneficiaries
of this mass-insanity are the owners of those U.S.-based
international corporations, the military and extraction giants.

Anthony
Cordesman, at the Center for Strategic and International Studies,
headlined on 15 August 2016, 
“U.S.
Wars in Iraq, Syria, Libya and Yemen: What Are The Endstates?”
 and
he said, “Once again, the United States does not seem to be
learning from its past. The real test of victory is never tactical
success or even ending a war on favorable military terms, it is what
comes next.” But he ignored the main reason why these invasions had
occurred. America’s weapons-manufacturers won’t have any markets,
at all, if there are no ‘enemy’ nations that are deemed by the
American public to be suitable targets for their weapons. Cordesman
is there calculating success and failure on the basis of the myths
(such as that the U.S. Government cares about those “Endstates”),
not of the realities (that it craves targets). The realities focus
upon the desires of the owners and executives of the
weapons-manufacturers and the extraction-firms, for ongoing and
increased profits and executive bonuses, and not on the
needs of America’s soldiers nor on the national security of the
American people. Least of all, do they focus upon the needs — such
as the welfare, freedom, or democracy — of the Iraqi people, or of
the Syrian people, or of the Libyan people, or of the Yemenite
people. It’s all just lies, PR. Those invasions served their actual
main functions when they were occurring. “The Endstates” there
are almost irrelevant to those real purposes, the purposes
for which the invasions were, and are, actually being done.

Here’s
an ideal example of this mass mind-control: On 19 November 2017, Josh
Rogin at the 
Washington
Post
 headlined “The
U.S. must prepare for Iran’s next move in Syria”
 and
reported that:

A
task force of senior former U.S. diplomatic and military officials
has come up with suggestions for how Trump could prevent Iran from
taking over what’s left of liberated Syria and fulfill his own
promise to contain Iranian influence in the region.

Most
urgently… the United States must impose real obstacles to Tehran’s
pursuit of total victory by the Assad regime in Syria,” 
the
report
 by
the Jewish Institute for National Security of America states. “Time
is of the essence.”

The
underlying presumption there was that the U.S. regime has legitimate
authorization to be occupying the parts of Syria it has invaded and
now occupies, and that Iran does not. But the reality is that the
U.S. regime is occupying Syria instead of assisting Syria’s
Government to defeat the U.S.-Saud-Israeli invasion to overthrow and
replace Syria’s Government, by 
stooges
who will be selected by the Saud family who own Saudi Arabia
,
and the reality is that Iran’s forces there are invitees who are
instead assisting Syria’s Government against the
Saudi-Israeli-American invasion. In other words: this WP article
is basically all lies. Furthermore, the Jewish Institute for National
Security of America is 
a
front-organization
 for
the 
fascist
regime that rules Israel
,
and the WP hid that fact, too, so its cited ‘expert’
was a mere PR agency for Israel’s aristocracy. So, this is
Deep-State propaganda, parading as ‘news’. 

Americans
actually pay their private good money to subscribe to (subsidize)
such bad public ‘news’papers as that. The billionaire who happens
to own that particular ‘news’paper (the WP), Jeff Bezos, had
founded and leads Amazon, which receives almost all of its profits
from Amazon Web Services (AWS), the cloud-computing division, which
supplies the U.S. ‘Defense’ Department, CIA, and NSA. 
For
example,
 “without
AWS and Prime, Amazon lost $2 billion in the 1st quarter of FY18. …
These losses come from Amazon’s retail business. About 60% of
Amazon’s revenue comes from retail and that’s where Amazon is
losing money.” Amazon is profitable because of what it sells mainly
to the Government, but also to other large U.S. international
corporations, and they all want to conquer Syria. None opposes that
evil goal. Although Bezos doesn’t like the Sauds, he has actually
been (at least until the Khashoggi matter) one of their main U.S.
media champions for the Sauds to take over Syria. It’s all just a
fool-the-public game. It works, it succeeds, and that’s what
Gallup’s polls are demonstrating. The public never learns. It’s a
fact, which has been proven in many different ways.

This
reality extends also to other nations, allies of the U.S.
aristocracy, and not only to the U.S. regime itself. For example, on
27 November 2018, a whistleblowing former UK Ambassador, Craig
Murray, who is a personal friend of Julian Assange, headlined
“Assange
Never Met Manafort. Luke Harding and the 
Guardian Publish
Still More Blatant MI6 Lies”
,
and he proved that Britain’s 
Guardian had
lied with total, and totally undocumented (and probably even totally
non-credible), fabrications, alleging that Julian Assange of
WikiLeaks had secretly met (in 2013, 2015, and 2016) with Paul
Manafort of the Trump campaign. The UK, of course, is a vassal-nation
of the U.S. aristocracy, and the 
Guardian is
run by Democratic Party propagandists (paid indirectly by Democratic
Party and conservative Tony-Blair-wing Labour Party 
billionaires)
and therefore fabricates in order to assist those Parties’ efforts
to impeach Trump and to dislodge Jeremy Corbyn from the Labour
Party’s leadership. However, each of America’s two political
parties (like the UK’s aristocracy itself) represents America’s
aristocracy, which, like Britain’s aristocracy, is united in
its 
determination
to eliminate Assange
 —
they are as determined to do that to him, just as Saudi Crown Prince
Mohammed bin Salman al-Saud was determined to eliminate Jamal
Khashoggi. ‘Democracy’? This? It is Big Brother.

Only
if the population boycott lying individuals and organizations, is
democracy even possible to exist in a nation. Democracy can’t
possibly exist more than truth does. In political matters, deceit is
always treachery; and its practitioners, whenever the evidence for it
is overwhelming and irrefutable, should experience whatever the
standard penalty is for treachery. Only in a land such as that, can
democracy possibly exist. Elsewhere, it simply can’t.
The only basis for democracy, is truth. Deceit is for
dictators, not for democrats. And deceit reigns, in the U.S. and in
its allied countries. Is this really tolerable? Americans, at least,
tolerate it.

When
Obama was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize, the far-right Rupert
Murdoch’s 
Wall
Street Journal 
editorialized
against Obama on 10 October 2009, by saying that 
“What
this suggests to us — and to the Norwegians — is the end of what
has been called ‘American exceptionalism’.”
 Little
did anyone then know that after winning re-election upon the
basis of such war-mongering lies from Obama, as that 
“America
remains the one indispensable nation”
,
Obama in February 2014 would go so far as to perpetrate a bloody
coup overthrowing
the democratically elected Government of one “dispensable”
nation, Ukraine; and, then, on 28 May of 2014, Obama would be
telling 
America’s
future generals
,
that “The United States is and remains the one indispensable
nation” and that Obama would, in that speech, explicitly malign
Ukraine’s neighbor Russia. He did it, in this speech, which
implicitly called 
all
nations except the U.S.
 “dispensable.”
He had carefully planned and orchestrated Americans’ hostility
toward Russia. His successor, Trump, lied saying that he wanted to
reverse Obama’s policies on this, and Trump promptly, once becoming
elected, increased and expanded those policies. Whatever a
deceitfully war-mongering country like this might be, it’s
certainly no democracy. Because democracy cannot be built upon a
ceaseless string of lies.

Tags: Big
Brother
 

===============================

* Ik wist niet, dit artikel schrijvend, dat er een organisatie bestaat met de naam ‘Feitenchecker’, waar men kan vinden of (nieuws-) berichten echt zijn of zijn opgemaakt met ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws)……. Je snapt het al, een organisatie die vooral de leugens van de reguliere media als waarheid bestempelt en terecht commentaar op die leugens als ‘fake’ neerzet….. Hier het adres: De Feitenchecker (@DeFeitenchecker) Twitter.

Zie ook:

Geen rectificaties voor meer dan 2 jaar brengen van fake news over het kwaadaardig sprookje Russiagate

Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten

Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots

‘Fake news’: alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn

De VS heeft Syrië volgepropt met ‘jihadisten’ en wapens

Democraten deden zich voor als Russen in false flag operatie om Roy Moore (Republikein) zwart te maken tijdens verkiezing…..

Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega’s voor zot uitgemaakt

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

‘Banden van Trump met Rusland’ gebaseerd op FBI operatie om VS ‘burger’ (CIA) in Iran vrij te krijgen……

Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift…..

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen

Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering‘ (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er ‘metersdikke’ dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikiLeaks)

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

‘Russiagate’: Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou

Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

‘Russiagate’ een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten…….

VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein…..

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

=========================================

En terzijde:

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

Trump (Republikeinen) wint de midterm verkiezingen, alsook de Democraten, het verschil voor mensen elders in de wereld, die onder VS terreur moeten leven, is nul komma nada…….

The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media

The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen……

New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!

Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

‘Fake News’ misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

De VS bombardeert landen in het Midden-Oosten >> Europa krijgt de vluchtelingen

Eric
Zuesse heeft een artikel geplaatst op de Strategic Culture Foundation,
waarin hij ten overvloede (maar volkomen terecht) stelt dat de VS, met hulp van
NAVO lidstaten Groot-Brittannië en Frankrijk, dood en verderf zaait
in landen waar het niets te zoeken heeft…… (landen in het Midden-Oosten, waar ik in dit geval ook Libië en Afghanistan toe reken) Door deze grootschalige
terreur zijn enorme stromen vluchtelingen op gang gekomen,
vluchtelingen die hun heil zoeken in Europa en dan m.n. in de EU,
niet alleen omdat dit de meest dichtstbijzijnde plek is waar men de
oorlog definitief achter zich kan laten, maar ook omdat de VS botweg
weigert vluchtelingen uit het Midden-Oosten op te nemen….. Dit was overigens in iets mindere mate al zo onder de Obama regering…..


Zuesse
wijst op de leugens die het westerse publiek (inclusief het Nederlandse) dagelijks op haar bord
geserveerd krijgt, zoals de leugens dat landen als Afghanistan, Irak,
Libië en Syrië, een gevaar vormen voor hun veiligheid…… Een
leugen zo doortrapt, dat ze zelfs een volkomen omdraaiing van feiten
is, immers de grootschalige westerse terreur in het Midden-Oosten
zorgt juist voor terreur op de straten van vooral de EU…….

De
hiervoor genoemde landen, vier landen kunnen zelfs amper worden gezien als
een gevaar voor de hen omringende landen, waar alleen Irak
als agressor kan worden aangewezen, dan wijs ik vooral op de oorlog
van Irak tegen Iran in de 80er jaren, waar deze vooral de VS goed
uitkwam, sterker nog: de VS heeft destijds Saddam Hoessein opgejut
Iran aan te vallen….. 


Nederland onderhield ook goede banden met Saddam Hoessein, zo kon VVD plork Bolkestein een exportvergunning afgeven voor de levering van onderdelen tot het bereiden van gifgas, iets waarvoor hij destijds uit en te na werd gewaarschuwd door deskundigen, daarmee is deze Bolkestein een enorme oorlogsmisdadiger!

Lees
dit uitstekende artikel waarin Zuesse gedetailleerd uitlegt hoe VS
bemoeienissen hebben geleid tot de dood van alleen deze eeuw al ruim
meer dan 2 miljoen slachtoffers, die in feite werden vermoord door de
VS, met hulp van een aantal NAVO landen, waaronder Nederland….. (waar niet vergeten dient te
worden dat de NAVO een speeltje is van de VS, zo liet het beest Trump de afgelopen dagen nog eens fijntjes zien tijdens de NAVO

top in Brussel…..)

America
Bombs, Europe Gets the Refugees. That’s Evil

America Bombs, Europe Gets the Refugees. That’s Evil

ERIC
ZUESSE
 |
09.07.2018 | 
WORLD / EUROPEMIDDLE
EAST

The
US Government (with France and a few other US allies) bombs Libya,
Syria, etc.; and the US regime refuses to accept any of the resulting
refugees — the burdens from which are now breaking the EU, and 
the
EU is sinking in economic competition against America’s
international corporations
.
America’s corporations remain blithely unscathed by not only 
the
refugees
 that
are breaking up the EU, but also by the EU’s economic sanctions
against Russia, Iran, and other allies of governments that the US
regime is trying to overthrow in its constant invasions and coups.
The US Government makes proclamations such as “Assad must go!” —
but by what right is the US Government involved, at all, in
determining whom the leaders in Syria will be? Syria never invaded
the US In fact, Syria never invaded anywhere (except, maybe, Israel,
in order to respond against Israel’s invasions). Furthermore, 
all
polling, even by Western pollsters, shows that Bashar al-Assad would
easily win any free and fair election in Syria.
 The
US Government claims to support democracy, but it does the exact
opposite whenever they want to get rid of a Government that is
determined to protect that nation’s sovereignty over its own
national territory, instead of to yield it to the US regime, or to
any other foreigners. The US regime has 
virtually
destroyed the United Nations
.

The
US regime even 
refuses
to provide restitution to Syria for its bombings, and for its arming
and training of the jihadists — the fundamentalist Sunni
mercenaries recruited from around the world — who are the US
regime’s “boots on the ground” trying to overthrow Syria’s
Government
.
Al Qaeda 
has
led
 the
dozens of 
jihadist
groups that have served as the US regime’s “boots on the ground”
to overthrow Assad
,
but Al Qaeda is 
good
enough to serve the purpose
,
in the US regime’s view of things. The US regime says that there
will be 
no
restitution to Syria
 unless
Syria accepts being ruled by 
‘rebels’
whose leadership
 is actually
being chosen by the US regime’s chief ally, the
fundamentalist-Sunni Saud family
,
who already own Saudi Arabia, and who 
(along
with the CIA) have been unsuccessfully trying, ever since 1949, to
take over the committedly secular, non-sectarian, nation of Syria
.
In fact, the CIA perpetrated 
two
of the three Syrian coups
 that
were carried out in 1949. 

The
US regime, and its allies, have used the Muslim Brotherhood, in order
to recruit into Syria the 100,000+ jihadists from around the world to
fight to overthrow Syria’s secular Government. Even the BBC’s 13
December 2013 detailed report, 
“Guide
to the Syrian rebels”
,
made clear that the “Syrian Rebels” were, in fact, overwhelmingly
jihadist and largely recruited from abroad. These were hardly
democrats. Even a Tony-Blair-founded anti-Assad NGO’s study
concluded that 
“Sixty
per cent of major Syrian rebel groups are Islamist 
extremists (not
just “Islamists” but “Islamist extremists”) and yet the
Blair outfit still supported the overthrow of the committed
secularist Assad (just as Blair had earlier participated himself in
the US regime’s 
destruction
of Iraq
). 

The
fundamentalist-Sunni royal Thani family own Qatar and have been the
top international funders of the Muslim Brotherhood, just as the
fundamentalist-Sunni royal Saud family, who 
own
Saudi Arabia
,
have been 
the
top funders of Al Qaeda
.
The main difference between the Sauds and the Thanis has been that
whereas 
the
Sauds hate Shia
 (and
that means 
especially
Iran
),
the Thanis don’t. Thus, for the Sauds, this is a war against the
Shia center, Iran, and not only against Syria. This war
against Syria was a coordinated US-Saud-Thani operation, in which the
fundamentalist-Sunni group, Al Qaeda, provided the leadership but 
the
(pan-Islamic) fundamentalist Muslim Brotherhood provided the largest
recruiting website
.
This entire hyper-aggressive operation was internationally
coordinated. 
The
Obama Administration started planning this operation, under Hillary
Clinton, in 2010.
 As
even the neoconservative (i.e., US-empire advocating) 
Washington
Post
 reported,
on 17 April 2011, from Wikileaks, 
“It
is unclear whether the State Department is still funding Syrian
opposition groups, but the cables indicate money was set aside [by
the Obama Administration] at least through September 2010.”
 That
article mentioned only “former members of the Muslim
Brotherhood,” not the Muslim Brotherhood itself; and no mention was
made in it to Al Qaeda, in any form. 

Then,
in 2013, the neoconservative 
Foreign
Policy
 magazine
headlined 
“How
the Muslim Brotherhood Hijacked Syria’s Revolution”
 and
was oblivious regarding the neoconservative Obama Administration’s
having planned that “hijacking,” starting in 2010 (but 
going
back even as far as Obama’s inauguration
;
this operation was a key part of 
his
secret anti-Russia agenda
,
which preceded even his coming into office). But if Obama wasn’t
neocon-enough to suit that magazine’s editors, then Trump certainly
should be, because 
Trump
continues Obama’s foreign policies but with an even more hostile
thrust against the Sauds’
chief
target, which is Iran.
 Above
all, 
the
US alliance’s goal has been for the Saud family’s selected
(rabidly anti-Shiite) people to take over and run the Syrian
Government
.
As Global Security 
has
phrased this matter
,
“The High Negotiations Committee [which is the group who are
negotiating against Assad’s government at the US-sponsored ‘peace’
talks] is a Saudi-backed coalition of Syrian opposition groups. The
High Negotiations Committee (HNC) was created in Saudi Arabia in
December 2015.” 

So,
this war in Syria has actually been the Sauds’ war to take over
Syria. And it actually 
started
in 1949
,
but the 
US-backed
Muslim-Brotherhood-led “Arab Spring” in 2011
 gave
the US and its allies the opportunity to culminate it, finally. 

And
Europe receives the fall-out from it. 
This
fall-out has been hurting European corporations, in international
competition against US corporations.
 It’s not only
political.

The
US regime has 
continued
this thrust, under Obama’s successor
.
US President Donald Trump demands European corporations to end their
business with Shiite Iran (which the Saud family is determined to
take over), and to end their business with Russia, 
which
America’s own billionaires themselves are determined to take over
,
just like the Sauds are determined to take over both Syria and Iran.

And
Europe receives refugees not only from places where the US and some
of its NATO allies have recently been bombing, but even from 
Kosovo,
Iraq, Afghanistan, and other places where NATO has bombed in the
past
,
and even from 
Ukraine,
where the US regime perpetrated a bloody coup in February 2014,
followed there by an ethnic-cleansing campaign to kill the residents
in areas which had voted the heaviest for the overthrown President
.

America
is no actual ally of Europe. The Marshall Plan is 
long-since
finished
,
and America has been taken over by 
psychopaths
who are Europe’s main enemies
,
not Europe’s friends, at all. (They’re friends of some European
aristocracies, but not of 
any European
public, not of even merely one public.)

Iran
and Russia should be Europe’s allies — 
they
didn’t cause any of Europe’s problems
.
America did. America’s intelligence agencies tapped (and 
probably
still tap
)
the phones of Germany’s Chancellor and practically everybody else,
and yet the US regime has the gall to blame Russia for interfering in
the political affairs of European countries. If that isn’t the pot
calling the kettle ‘black’, then what is? If anything, the EU’s
sanctions should be against doing business with American firms
— 
not against
doing business with Russian firms, or with Iranian firms. European
politicians who support the US support Europe’s top enemy.

Russia
is, itself, a European country, which additionally traverses much of
Asia, but America is no European country, 
at
all
,
and yet now is so brazen as to demand that Europe must do America’s
bidding — not only against Russia, but also against the
Sauds’ 
main target,
which is Iran (the same main target as Israel’s).

Why
are Europeans not asking themselves: 
Who is
Europe’s enemy in all of this — what 
causes this
refugee-crisis? The refugees certainly didn’t.

It’s
not Russia, and it’s not Iran, and it’s not China; 
it
is America — which is the true enemy of them all, and of us all —
including even of the American people ourselves
,
because 
the
US Government no longer actually represents the American people
.
These invasions, and military occupations, and coups, do not serve
America’s public; they serve America’s aristocracy. The US is no
longer (
if
it ever was
)
a democracy. The US Government now is the US aristocracy
— 
not the
US public. It’s a 
dictatorship.
And, it has 
the
type of ‘news’media that any dictatorship has
.

On
June 30th, the US aristocracy’s 
New
York Times
 headlined “Bavaria:
Affluent, Picturesque — and Angry”
,
and reported “the new angry center of Europe, the latest
battleground for populists eager to bring down both Chancellor Angela
Merkel of Germany and the idea of a liberal Europe itself.” Their
elitist (pro-US-aristocracy) ‘reporter’ (actually propagandist)
interviewed ‘experts’ who condemn Europe’s politicians that are
trying to assuage their own public’s anger against the EU’s
open-door policy regarding this flood of refugees from 
what
is actually, for the most part, the US regime’s (and its allies’)
bombings — air-support of the boots-on-the-ground jihadist
mercenaries.
 The
combination of this air-support, and of the jihadists, has been the
backbone of the US-Saudi-Israeli effort to overthrow and replace
Syria’s Government.

Libya
was a similar case, but was only friendly toward Russia,
not 
allied with
Russia, as both Syria and Iran are.

The
US aristocracy funds an enormous international PR campaign for all
this.
 These
are 
‘humanitarian’
bombings
 in
order to replace 
a
‘barbaric’ Government
 —
but replace it with what? With one that would be chosen by the Sauds.
And this propaganda-campaign is also funded by the
US-
allied aristocracies. All
of the major ‘news’media, in US and allies, receive their
‘expert’ ‘information’ from these privately-funded and
government-funded propagandists, who are treated by ‘journalists’ as
being objective and experts (which they’re not).

The NYT article
says — and I add here key explanatory links:

This
is not about economics,” said 
Gerald
Knaus
,
the director of the 
European
Stability Initiative
, [and
though unmentioned by the 
Times“The
Open Society Institute was a major core funder”
 of
the ESI, which is] 
a
Berlin-based think tank. “It is about identity and a very
successful populist P.R. machine that is rewriting recent history.”

So:
the 
Times was
secretly (and they didn’t include any links to help online readers
know who was actually funding their ‘experts’, at all) pumping
NATO propaganda, as if it were authentic and neutral news-reporting,
instead of craven service to the US aristocracy that controls the US
Government and its NATO military alliance. This is the 
New
York Times
, itself,
that is “rewriting recent history.” That’s how they do it —
constantly (as ‘news’).

And
here is some of that “recent history” the Times is
“rewriting” (by simply omitting to so much as even just suggest,
but which is 
essential
backgound
 in
order to understand the 
real history
behind this important matter):

http://researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/RP01-50/RP01-50.pdf

House
of Commons, Research Paper 01/50, 2 May 2001

European
Security and Defence Policy: Nice and Beyond”

pp.
47-48:

On
7 February 2001 the Foreign Secretary, Robin Cook, emphasised the
ESDP’s [European Security and Defence Policy’s] tie to NATO
during a press interview, following his meeting in Washington with US
National Security Adviser, Condoleeza Rice. He said:

I
have stressed that the 
European
Security Initiative will strengthen the capacity of Europe to
contribute to crisis management and therefore is welcome to a
Washington that is interested in fairer burden sharing, and
that Washington can be confident that Britain will insist that
the European Security Initiative is firmly anchored on NATO. We are
both determined to see that happen, we are both determined to make
sure that the European Security Initiative carries out its promise to
strengthen the North Atlantic Alliance
.119

——

Though
the Sauds, and also Israel’s aristocracy, are mainly anti-Iran, the
US aristocracy are obsessed with their goal of conquering Russia.
Since Iran, and Syria, are both allied with Russia, the US regime is
trying to overthrow those Russia-allied Governments, before 
going
in for the kill, against Russia itself
.
That’s what all of these economic sanctions, and the bombings and
the backing of Al Qaeda for overthrowing Syria’s Government, are
really all about. 

Is this what
today’s Europeans want their Governments to be doing — and doing
it for 
that reason,
the US aristocracy’s reason? Despite the huge harms it is certainly
causing to Europeans?

Here,
then, is a debate between, on the one hand a retired CIA official who
thinks “Our relationship with Israel causes us war with
Muslims,” versus Representatives in the US Congress who are
actually representatives of Israel’s Government
 and
definitely 
not
representatives
of the American people. Both sides in that debate are acceptable to
the aristocrats who control the US Government, because neither side
argues that the apartheid theocratic Government of Israel is an enemy
of the American people (as is documented actually to be the
case, 
here and here),
nor that 
the
entire problem of Islamic terrorism is fundamentalist-Sunni, and that
only Israel gets hit by terrorism that’s from both Sunnis and
Shiites — that Shiites (the US alliance’s targets) are no terrorist
threat, at all, to Europeans (nor to Americans)
 —
the “Islamist” threat is actually only from fundamentalist
Sunnis, which are the very same groups that are secretly allied with
America’s aristocracy and the Sauds. Neither side of the ‘debate’
acknowledges that both the Sauds and Israel (and 
Israel’s
lobbyists represent internationally also the Sauds’ interests
)
are enemies both of the American people, and of the peoples of
Europe. 

As
the world’s greatest blogger, the former UK Ambassador (but too
honest to stay in that business) Craig Murray, recently said under
the headline, 
“No
Trump, No Clinton, No NATO”
:
“The destruction of Libya’s government and infrastructure
directly caused the Mediterranean boat migrant crisis, which has
poisoned the politics of much of the European Union.” But, of
course, the US regime and its allies have also destroyed other
countries than that — and thus caused refugees to Europe from many
nations. And, finally, 
even
the US Government (though as quietly as possible) acknowledges that
it has destroyed Afghanistan
.
Ironically, that’s the very nation where America and the Sauds, 
in
1979
,
had started their war against all Governments that 
won’t
buckle to them
.

Furthermore,
the US regime intends to keep it up. In case a reader might happen to
think that, surely, the US regime and its allies are going to quit
this rousing of hornets’ nests; Sharmine Narwani, who is one of the
very few non-“embedded” journalists who reports in The West about
— and (which the mainstream ones don’t) 
from 
the war in Syria, headlined, on June 25th, 
“Are
al-Qaeda Affiliates Fighting Alongside US Rebels in Syria’s
South?”
 and
she found that the answer to this question is a resounding yes:

Despite
its US and UN designation as a terrorist organization, Nusra [Al
Qaeda’s main name in Syria] has been openly fighting alongside
the “Southern Front,” a group of 54 opposition militias funded
and commanded by a US-led war room based in Amman, Jordan called the
Military Operations Center (MOC). …

Sources
inside Syria — both opposition fighters and Syrian military brass
(past and present) — suggest the command center consists of the US,
UK, France, Jordan, Israel, and some Persian Gulf states. … In
practice, the US doesn’t appear to mind the Nusra affiliation —
regardless of the fact that the group is a terror organization — as
long as the job gets done.

These
wars, which pour Middle Eastern (and also 
Ukrainian*)
refugees into the EU, are inter-aristocratic conflicts reflecting
inter-aristocratic competitions; and the publics everywhere suffer
enormously from them. The 
gainers
from it
 are
very few but very rich (and they hire very powerful agents in Europe
and elsewhere). Those billionaire gainers, and their agents, should
be Europe’s targets — 
not Russia
and Iran. NATO must end now. Europe needs to be freed, at last, from
America’s permanent-war-for permanent-‘peace’ grip. For
Europeans, who are the indirect victims, to be blaming the refugees,
who are the direct victims, won’t solve anything, but will simply
please the victimizers, as is the public’s ancient habit (to please
the powerful). A break must be made, away from that ugly past.
European publics must lead the way, or no one will.

PS:
Since this article asserts such a large number of things that
contradict what the US Government and its agents assert, I have
sought out and here linked to the highest-quality, least-contested
and most highly authenticated, sources and also to sources that link
to such sources; all of which, taken together, constitute a
book-length proof of the title-case here, that “America Bombs,
Europe Gets the Refugees. That’s Evil.” Furthermore, this online
virtual “book” is tracking back to the most unimpeachable
documents, all of them available merely by means of clicking, and
thus without the reader’s needing to visit a huge scholarly library
(which might be quite distant); so, the reader can here easily branch
out to this entire, and otherwise largely hidden, world of reliable
sources, which the US regime wants the public not to know, and
certainly not to 
understand.
It’s no longer necessary to be an intelligence-professional in
order to come to understand what the regime wants the public 
not to
understand.

Tags: European
Union
  Middle
East
  Migration 

ERIC ZUESSE   Eric ZUESSE


‘American’ writer and investigative historian.

*
Kleine vergissing: de Oekraïners die Oost-Oekraïne ontvluchten
vanwege de bombardementen van het Oekraïense leger (voor het grootste
deel bevolkt met neonazi’s), vluchten niet naar de EU, maar naar
Rusland. (ze zouden al worden vermoord, voordat ze de westgrens van Oekraïne bereikten…..)

Vluchtelingencrisis EU één op één veroorzaakt door de VS (met hulp van de NAVO)…..

Eric
Zuesse, de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel dat verscheen op de Strategic Culture Foundation, begint ermee
de beschuldiging van Trump aan te halen, waarin deze duivel de Duitse politieke leiders en die van andere EU
landen, de schuld voor de vluchtelingencrisis in ‘Europa’ in de
schoenen schuift…..

In
werkelijkheid is het, zoals op deze plek al zo vaak gesteld, juist de
schuld van de VS (met de NAVO aan de hand) dat illegale oorlogen
begint in landen die voor haar ofwel strategisch liggen dan wel
landen zijn die over grote voorraden olie en gas of andere belangrijke grondstoffen beschikken…….

Zuesse
toont ten overvloede in zijn redelijk uitgebreide artikel aan dat
inderdaad de VS verantwoordelijk is voor de ‘vluchtelingencrisis’ in de EU landen…. (eigenlijk nog veel erger: voor de enorme
ellende en het gigantisch aantal doden in landen die het slachtoffer
zijn van de grootscheepse VS terreur >> alleen deze eeuw al ruim meer dan 2 miljoen moorden…)

Daarnaast
spreekt men in de EU van een vluchtelingencrisis, terwijl de landen
waar de VS haar illegale oorlogen voert en de landen daaromheen echt
te maken hebben met een vluchtelingencrisis, daar 90% van de
vluchtelingen
in eigen land dan wel in de regio hun toevlucht
zoeken!!

Zuesse
stelt dat Obama m.n. verantwoordelijk is voor de vluchtelingencrisis,
echter in de EU hadden we al een grote toeloop van vluchtelingen
nadat de VS Afghanistan en Irak aanviel, beide in feite illegale
oorlogen, maar voor die oorlogen was toch echt de Bush administratie
verantwoordelijk…

Ach
zal komen doordat Zuesse nu eenmaal in de VS woont en er in de VS na
het begin van de illegale oorlogen tegen Afghanistan en Irak weinig
of geen aandacht was voor de vluchtelingstromen die deze oorlogen
opgang brachten. Al moet gezegd dat vergeleken met de huidige
hysterie over vluchtelingen, er na aanvang van de
vluchtelingenstromen uit Afghanistan en Irak er amper sprake was van
veel ophef. Alleen fascistische griezels als Wilders hadden destijds
een grote bek over ‘het enorme aantal vluchtelingen’, waar deze
figuren zo min mogelijk over de oorzaak van het vluchten wilden
weten en daar al helemaal niet over naar buiten zijn getreden
(tijdens het haatzaaien tegen en angstzaaien voor vluchtelingen,
gedurende de voorlichting aan uh oplichting van
volgelingen)…… Waar de destijds politieke tegenstanders van Wilders intussen veel van de haat- en angstzaaierij die Wilders bracht, intussen hebben overgenomen, neem het CDA en de VVD….

Zuesse stelt voorts dat Obama in 2011 besloot dat er regeringswisselingen moesten plaatsvinden in Oekraïne, Libië en Syrië, echter om een voorbeeld te nemen: al in 2006 werden de eerste plannen gemaakt om in de Syrische politiek in te grijpen, middels een opstand die moest resulteren in een staatsgreep…. Zoals we nu weten is die operatie gelukt, waar deze in Syrië mislukte. Hetzelfde scenario werd in Libië ‘met succes’ uitgevoerd, zodat dit land: -in puin ligt en -van het rijkste Afrikaanse land is verworden tot bijna het armste van dat continent, een land dat volkomen in chaos is gestort en waar zelfs openlijke slavenmarkten worden gehouden……

How
the US, Under Obama, Created Europe’s Refugee Crisis

How the US, Under Obama, Created Europe’s Refugee Crisis

ERIC
ZUESSE
 |
24.06.2018 | 
WORLD EUROPEMIDDLE
EAST

The
current US President, Donald Trump, 
claimed
on June 18th
,
that Germany’s leadership, and the leadership in other EU nations,
caused the refugee-crisis that Europe is facing:  

The
people of Germany are turning against their leadership as migration
is rocking the already tenuous Berlin coalition. Crime in Germany is
way up. Big mistake made all over Europe in allowing millions of
people in who have so strongly and violently changed their culture!”

The
US Government is clearly lying about this. The US Government itself
caused this crisis that Europeans are struggling to deal with. Would
the crisis even exist, at all, if the US had not invaded and tried to
overthrow (and in some instances actually overthrown) the governments
in Libya, Syria, and elsewhere — the places from which these
refugees are escaping? The US Government, and a few of its allies in
Europe (the ones who actually therefore really do share in
some of the authentic blame for this crisis) caused this war and
government-overthrow, etc., but Germany’s Government wasn’t among
them, nor were many of the others in Europe. If the US Government had
not led these invasions, probably not even France would have
participated in any of them. The US Government, alone, is responsible
for having caused these refugees. The US Government itself created
this enormous burden to Europe, and yet refuses to accept these
refugees that it itself had produced, by its having invaded and
bombed to overthrow (among others) Libya’s Government, and then
Syria’s Government, and by 
its
aiding Al Qaeda in organizing and leading and arming, jihadists from
all over the world to come to Syria to overthrow Syria’s Government
and to replace it with one that would be selected by the US regime’s
key Middle Eastern ally, the Saud family, who own Saudi Arabia,
including its Government, and who are determined to take over Syria
.
Trump blames Angela Merkel for — in essence — having been an ally
of the US regime, a regime of aggression which goes back decades, 
and
which Trump himself now is leading
, instead
of his ending, and of his restoring democracy to the United States,
and, finally, thus, his restoring freedom (from America), and peace,
to other nations, in Europe, and elsewhere (such as in Syria, Yemen,
etc.). He blames Merkel, not himself and his predecessor — not the
people who actually caused these refugees.

Hypocrisy
purer than that which Trump there expressed, cannot be imagined, and
this hypocrisy comes from Trump now, 
no
longer 
from
Obama, who, in fact, caused the problem.

As
the 2016 study, 
“An
Overview of the Middle East Immigrants in the EU:
 Origin,
Status Quo and Challenges” states in its Abstract:

EU
has the most inhabited immigrant population; it has up to a
population of 56 million foreign-born people. And due to the
perennial war and chaos in the Middle East, the amount of relocated
population in the region, especially the number of refugees, ranks
the No.1 all over the world. … There are a large number of refugees
and asylum seekers heading to EU countries; it can be divided into
four stages. Since the Arab Spring, especially after the outbreak of
the civil war in Syria in 2011, and the rise of the “Islamic State”
in 2013, the whole EU area have experienced the biggest wave of
refugees since World War II.”

All
of these invasions have been, and are, invasions of countries where
the US regime demands regime-change.

In
order to understand the deeper source of this problem, one must
understand, first, the US regime’s 
continuing
obsession to conquer Russia after its communism and Warsaw Pact
military alliance, had ended
 (click
onto that link to see the documentation); and, second, one needs to
understand the US regime’s 
consequent
and consistent aim after the supposed end of the Cold War, to take
over control of Russia’s allied countries, including not only those
within the Soviet Union and its military Warsaw Pact, but also within
the Middle East, especially Syria and Iran, and even countries such
as Libya, where the leader was nominally Sunni but nonetheless
friendly toward Russia
.
(The link there provides documentation not only of what’s said
here, but it also documents that the alliance between the two
aristocracies, of the US and of Saudi Arabia, is essential to the US
aristocracy’s Middle-Eastern objective; and 
Israel’s
aristocracy serves as an essential agent of the Sauds in this crucial
regard, because the Sauds rely heavily upon the Israeli regime to do
its lobbying in Washington
.
In other words: America’s consistent objective is to isolate Russia
so as for the US regime to emerge ultimately in a position to take
over Russia itself. That’s the deeper source of Europe’s
refugee-crisis.)

Back
at the start of the promised post-Cold-War period, in 1990, the US
regime, under its then-President, George Herbert Walker
Bush, 
privately
and repeatedly agreed
 with
the USSR regime, under its then-President Mikhail Gorbachev, to end
the Cold War — 
agreed
that NATO would not expand “one inch to the east”
 —
that there would be no expansion of the US military alliance against
the USSR (soon to become against Russia alone). The US regime’s
promise was that NATO would not take in and add to NATO’s
membership, any of the countries that then were either in the USS.R’s
military alliance the 
Warsaw
Pact
 (Albania,
Bulgaria, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Poland, and Romania) or
in 
USSRitself other
than Russia
 (Armenia,
Azerbaijan, Byelorussia, Estonia, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kirghizia,
Latvia, Lithuania, Moldavia, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, and
Uzbekistan), except for the eastern part of Germany. The US regime
simply lied. But the Russian Government followed through on all of
its commitments. Russia was now trapped, by Gorbachev’s having
trusted liars, whose actual goal turned out to be world-conquest
— not peace.

Currently,
the 
membership
of NATO
 includes
all of the former Warsaw Pact nations, and now the US regime aims to
bring in also to “
NATO
membership: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, the former Yugoslav
Republic of Macedonia¹ and Ukraine.”
 Georgia
and Ukraine are the first parts of the former USSR republics — not
merely parts of the Warsaw Pact but parts now of the USSR itself —
to join the anti-Russian military alliance, if either of them gets
allowed in. The very possibility of this happening, goes beyond
anything that the naive, trusting, Mikhail Gorbachev, would ever have
imagined. He hadn’t the slightest idea of how evil was (and still
is) America’s Deep State (that which 
controls
America
).
But now we all know. History is clear and unambiguous on the matter.

The
NATO mouthpiece, Brookings Institution, headlined on 15 November
2001, 
“NATO
Enlargement: Moving Forward; Expanding the Alliance and Completing
Europe’s Integration”
 and
pretended that this expansion is being done in order to help
Europeans, instead of to conquer Russia.

Ukraine
has the longest of all European borders with Russia and so has been
America’s top target to seize. But before seizing it, the US had
tried in 2008 to turn Georgia against Russia, and the Georgian
Mikheil Saakashvili was a key US agent in that effort. Saakashvili
subsequently became involved in the violent coup that overthrew
Ukraine’s Government in February 2014. Saakashvili organized the
Georgian contingent of the snipers that were sent to Ukraine to shoot
into the crowds on the Maidan Square and kill both police and
demonstrators there, in such a way so that the bullets would 
seem to
have come from the police (Berkut) and/or other forces of Ukraine’s
democratically elected Government. (Click on 
this
link
 to
see two of the Georgian snipers casually describing their
participation in the coup, and referring tangentially to former
Georgian President Saakashvili’s role in it. 
Here
is a more comprehensive video compilation
 describing
and showing the coup itself. As 
I
have pointed out
,
the testimony of these two Georgian snipers is entirely consistent
with what the investigation by the EU’s Foreign Ministry had found
out on 26 February 2014 about the snipers, that 
“they
were the same snipers, killing people from both sides” and that
these snipers were “from the new coalition government”
 instead
of from the government that was being overthrown — that it was a
coup, no ‘revolution’ such as Obama’s people claimed, and
Trump’s people now assert.) The US regime has agents in all regions
of the former Russia-affiliated bloc — not only in
Western Europe.

Obama’s
coup to grab Ukraine away from its 
previous
neutrality
 and
to make it immediately 
a
neo-Nazi rabidly anti-Russian country
,
has destroyed Ukraine — not only from the standpoint of the EU, but
(and click on the link if you don’t already know this) 
from
the standpoint of the Ukrainian people themselves
.
Who 
wouldn’t want
to leave there?

Europe
has refugees from the Ukrainian operation too, not 
only (though
mainly) from the Middle Eastern ones.

Europe’s
enemy isn’t Russia’s aristocracy, but America’s aristocracy.
It’s the billionaires who control America’s international
corporations — not the billionaires who control Russia’s
international corporations — it is 
specifically America’s
billionaires; it is 
the
people who control the US Government
;
these, and no Russians at all, are the actual decision-makers, who
are behind bringing down Europe. In order for Europe to win,
Europeans must know whom their real enemies are. The root of the
problem is in the US, Europe’s now 
fake ‘ally’.
Today’s America isn’t the America of the Marshall Plan. The US
Government has since been taken over by gangsters. And they want to
take over the world. Europe’s refugee-crisis is simply one of the
consequences.

In
fact, 
Obama
had started, by no later than 2011, to plan these regime-change
operations, in Libya, Syria, and Ukraine
.
But, in any case, none of the regime-change operations that caused
the current unprecedented flood of refugees into Europe started
because of what Europe’s leaders did (other than their cooperating
with the US regime). Today’s American Government is Europe’s
enemy, no friend at all, to the peoples of Europe. Trump’s blaming
this crisis on Europe’s leaders isn’t just a lie; it is a
slanderous one.

And
this fact is separate from Trump’s similar slanderous lie against
the refugees themselves. On May 8th, Germany’s 
Die
Welt
 newspaper
had headlined 
“Number
of crimes falls to lowest level since 1992”
 and
reported that Germany’s Interior Minister, Horst Seehofer,
announced the 2017 national crime statistics, and he said, “Germany
has become safer,” the safest in the last 30 years. Seehofer
happens to be a member of Chancellor Merkel’s Administration who is
angling to replace her as Chancellor by appealing to the strong
anti-immigrant portion of their own conservative party, but even he
had to admit, essentially, that the anti-immigrant slur that Trump
subsequently made on June 18th is a bald lie; it’s even the
exact opposite of the truth. Trump’s tweeted comment then was a
lying slander not only against Merkel and other European leaders, but
also against the refugees that the US regime itself had produced. How
depraved is that? How depraved is Trump?

The
refugee crisis isn’t due to the refugees themselves; and it’s not
due to Europe’s leaders; it is due to the almost constantly lying
US regime — the people who actually control America’s Government
and America’s international corporations.

On
June 21st, Manlio Dinucci at Global Research headlined 
“The
Circuit of Death in the ‘Enlarged Mediterranean’”
 and
he opened by saying, “The politico-media projectors, focussed as
they are on the migratory flow from South to North across the
Mediterranean, are leaving other Mediterranean flows in the dark –
those moving from North to South, comprised of military forces and
weapons.” But the world’s biggest international seller of weapons
is 
the
US, not the EU
;
so, his placing the main focus on European billionaires was wrong.
The main culprits are on Trump’s own side of the Atlantic, and this
is what is being ignored, on both sides of the Atlantic. The real
problem isn’t across the Mediterranean; it is across the Atlantic.
That’s where Europe’s enemy is.

On
7 August 2015, I headlined 
“The
US Is Destroying Europe”
 and
reported that: 

In
Libya, Syria, Ukraine, and other countries at the periphery or edges
of Europe, US President Barack Obama has been pursuing a policy of
destabilization, and even of bombings and other military assistance,
that drives millions of refugees out of those peripheral areas and
into Europe, thereby adding fuel to the far-rightwing fires of
anti-immigrant rejectionism, and of resultant political
destabilization, throughout Europe, not only on its peripheries, but
even as far away as in northern Europe.”

It’s
continuing under Trump.

Tags: European
Union
  Middle
East
  Migration 

===========================

Zie ook:

CDU en CSU bedriegen kiezers in Beieren en hoe vluchtelingen tot een hysterische CSU crisis hebben geleid…..

Vluchtelingen in Turkije!‘ (van Aleke’s Blog!)

Rutte (VVD premier) en Pechtold (veilingmeester D66) blij met concentratiekampen voor vluchtelingen in EU en Afrika……..

Meer dan 1.000 Belgische academici keren zich tegen het inhumane vluchtelingenbeleid en de ontmenselijking……..

Ten Broeke (VVD Tweede Kamer): de opvangkampen in Turkije zijn prima……….. AUW!!!

Algerije houdt razzia’s en stuurt mensen te voet de woestijn in……….

Save The Children: Ieder kind verdient een eerlijke kans…….. AUW!!!

Rutte (VVD) roemt Turkije-deal en wil ook concentratiekampen in Noord-Afrika…..

PS: ik moet nog wel opmerken dat een aantal EU landen, waaronder Nederland, wel medeverantwoordelijk zijn voor de vluchtelingenstromen, daar ze blindelings achter de VS aanliepen en lopen en mee hebben gedaan/meedoen aan de grootschalige terreur die de VS in het Midden-Oosten uitoefende en uitoefent…… Overigens zijn die landen ook mede verantwoordelijk voor de terreur op de straten in de EU, daar dit een direct gevolg is van onder VS leiding uitgeoefende westerse terreur in landen waar het niets, maar dan ook helemaal niets te zoeken had en heeft….

Obama dreigt Putin met nucleaire oorlog, ofwel WOIII, dat was wel een Nobelprijs waard!!

De VS denkt werkelijk een nucleaire oorlog te kunnen winnen, te zot voor woorden en een enorm verraad aan het grootste deel van de eigen bevolking, die net zo hard tot slachtoffer gebombardeerd zal worden als de door de VS bestookte tegenpartij (Rusland)……..

Nadat de VS net als Groot-Brittannië een paar maanden geleden al heeft aangegeven, niet terug te deinzen, kernraketten in te zetten bij een (eerste) aanval. Uiteraard tegen Rusland, al werd dat er door beide terreurstaten niet bij vermeld…….. Daarmee werd een eind gemaakt aan het tijdperk, dat de ‘atoombom’ (kernraket) een afschrikkingsmiddel en daarmee een defensief middel was, tegen de ‘atoombommen’ van de tegenpartij………

Afgelopen zaterdag vond ik het volgende artikel op het blog van Stan van Houcke. Het betreft een interview met vicepresident Biden, dat gisteren werd uitgezonden op NBC. Volgens Biden zal Obama gepaste maatregelen nemen, mocht Trump op 3 november a.s. de presidentsverkiezingen winnen……. De gepaste maatregelen, waar Biden op doelt, kunnen volgens Eric Zuesse niets anders zijn, dan een nucleaire aanval inzetten tegen Rusland……

De regering Obama en de rest van de democratische partij, doen hun best Putin te beschuldigen van inmenging in de VS verkiezingen…….. Zo zou Rusland zich al actief via computer hacks hebben bemoeid met de voorverkiezingen in de VS, aldus het bloeddorstig geteisem in Washington…… Alsof de verkiezingen in de VS eerlijke democratische verkiezingen zijn, waar niets op aan te merken is…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Moet u nagaan: als er een ‘land’ op de wereld is, dat zich bemoeit met regeringen elders, is het de VS wel: als een land niet VS gunstig gestemd is, probeert de VS eerst middels een opstand, deze regering weg te krijgen voor een wel VS gunstig gestemde variant. Als dit niet lukt, begint de VS desnoods een illegale oorlog……

De laatste 15 jaar is de VS al 4 keer een illegale oorlog begonnen….. Of wacht even: eigenlijk 5, daar de oorlog die de door de VS geparachuteerde corrupte neonazi-vriend en juntaleider Porosjenko tegen de bevolking in het oosten van Oekraïne is begonnen, een voortvloeisel is uit het hiervoor genoemde scenario. De VS stak 4 miljard dollar in de opstand, die in Oekraïne tot de door de VS gewenste staatsgreep leidde…

Kortom: Obama sluit WOIII op basis van een leugen niet uit!

Lees en huiver:

President
Obama Threatens President Putin with Nuclear War

Posted
on 
October
14, 2016
 by Eric
Zuesse.

Eric Zuesse

It’ll
be at a time of our choosing,” says U.S. Vice President Joe Biden,
on NBC’’s “Meet the Press,” to be aired on Sunday, October
16th.

Interviewer
Chuck Todd had asked him, “Why would he [Obama] send a message out
to Putin?” Biden pursed his lips, paused, and said, with a grim
look on his face, “We sent him the message.” Of course that
didn’t answer Todd’s question, which was “Why?” Biden and
Todd both remained silent for another tense moment. Then, Biden
picked up again: “We have the capacity to do it, and, uh,” and
Todd interrupted him there with “He’ll know it?” Biden replied:
“He’ll know it, and it’ll be at a time of our choosing, and
under circumstances that have the greatest impact. Uh, the capacity
to do, to fundamentally alter the election, is not what people think;
and, uh, I tell you what: to the extent that they do [‘do’
presumably meaning: fundamentally alter the election], we will be
proportionate in what we do. And, uh,” Todd again interrupted his
interviewee, and said, “So, a message is going to be sent. Will the
public know?” Biden replied, “Hope not.”

Of
course, that “Hope not” could mean many things. It might mean: A
blitz nuclear attack in line with our government’s belief that we
now enjoy 
Nuclear
Primacy
 (an
idea that was first 
published
by the Council on Foreign Relations
 in
2006, and which has never yet been renounced by the U.S. government,
during the decade since). That would be very much a public response,
which Biden would “hope not” to be ’necessary’. In other
words: Biden might have meant, there: “I hope it won’t have to be
that.” But, clearly, Biden isn’t wanting the public to understand
anything, other than that President Obama has threatened President
Putin, with something, and that it will be “proportionate,” and
the excuse for it will be — if it will happen — that Putin had
done something which Obama thinks caused Hillary Clinton to lose the
election to Donald Trump.

Standing
behind what Biden is saying there, is the belief that Putin does have
in his possession some option that might “fundamentally alter the
election.” This is clearly a threat that’s meant to deter Putin
from doing something that Putin hasn’t yet done. Obama is telling
Putin that either the winner will be the person he wants to be his
successor, or else — or else what?

In
other words: what Biden is saying, is that, if Trump wins this
election, then there is going to be some sudden, unannounced, U.S.
government response against Putin, and that only after it is over,
will the U.S. government explain to the public why it did what it
did.

But,
of course, that assumes Americans will still be alive, even if
Russians are not; and, so, if the “proportionate” response turns
out to be a blitz nuclear attack against Russia, then anyone who is
still alive will be wondering: what was it ‘proportionate’ to?

The
United States is no longer — at least not in Syria — actually
fighting the thing that Trump calls “extremist Islamic terrorism”:
we are instead 
arming
Al Qaeda in Syria to overthrow and replace Putin’s ally, Bashar
al-Assad, there
.
All of the U.S. government’s talk against “ISIL” (the Sauds’
preferred acronym for “ISIS”) is mere distraction from the tens
of thousands of other jihadist fighters from other jihadist groups
that have also been imported by the U.S. and Saudi governments into
Syria as Obama’s and the Sauds’ “boots on the ground” to
overthrow Assad there. The leadership now for all of those jihadist
groups (except for ISIS itself) is, in fact, Al Qaeda in Syria, which
has gone under the name “al-Nusra.” Nusra is supplying the
leadership now to all the jihadist factions that have been sent into
Syria; Nusra is the only jihadist group that possesses the long
experience and training in jihad and military matters, which is
needed in order to be able to overthrow Assad. 
Al
Qaeda is now America’s essential ally, at doing what the U.S.
government most wants to do: overthrow and replace Assad.
 The
U.S. is deadly serious about that intention, as can be seen 
here
from the NBC News preview video of their interview with Biden
,
from which the above quotations are sourced. Looking at Biden’s
face there, one can see that this is deadly serious. This isn’t
about sexual aggression — either Donald Trump’s or Bill Clinton’s
— it’s about the survival of civilization, or else nuclear war.

There
have been many reports in the U.S. press saying that Obama has, ever
since at least October 6th, been contemplating an all-out U.S.
bombing campaign to bring down Assad. But that would mean war with
Russia, which has been actively bombing Nusra and all the other
jihadists in Syria. 

Hillary
Clinton is urging a 
“no-fly
zone” in Syria
,
so that we can do to Assad what we did to another ally of Moscow,
Muammar Gaddafi. However, when that was done to Gaddafi, Putin stood
aside and wasn’t supplying military assistance to Gaddafi, which
would have enabled Gaddafi to wipe out the fundamentalist Muslims who
were trying to overthrow him. Russia is involved actively, this time,
to prevent happening in Syria what happened in Libya. A no-fly zone
in Syria would thus mean U.S. war against Russia.

These
are tense times. Any escalation that the U.S. can do against Russia,
can be met by an escalation that Russia can do against the United
States.

Consequently,
whatever escalation Obama is now threatening against Putin, might be
met by an escalation on the other side. Where will it stop, or would
it even be able to stop?

Whatever
escalation Obama might consider to be ‘proportionate’, could
consequently end up ending the world as we know it — and not for
the better. 
Hillary
Clinton has threatened Putin with war
;
now Barack Obama has done likewise.

Whatever
Biden’s assignment here actually was from Obama, one thing about it
is clear: this President is determined that Hillary Clinton be his
successor, and Obama will target anyone who gets in his way if he
doesn’t win his way on this. And Obama wants the American public to
know that this is how he feels about the matter. 

This
Biden-interview is really intended, in that sense, to be a threat
aimed at America’s voters, telling them, telling each one of us:
Vote for Hillary Clinton, or else! He’s not telling us what that
“or else!” is going to be — and maybe he himself has
no accurate idea of how far it will ultimately cycle
and go. Ultimately, whatever he thinks it would be, might not turn
out to be the last step in this cycle of escalation — unless it’s
going to go directly to a blitz attack against
Russia.

Obama
is thus coercing us, before he coerces Putin. He’s telling
us: If we vote against Hillary Clinton — if she
loses this election — then President Obama has something in mind
that we won’t like — and he won’t wait until the next President
is inaugurated on 20 January 2017 to do it, whatever ‘it’ might
be. Obama here is threatenting not only Vladimir Putin, but the
American people. Even if Obama truly believes that he alone possesses
all the power, he does not, unless he possesses the power to
terrorize America’s voters to elect Hillary Clinton, even if we
otherwise would not.

Investigative
historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  
They’re
Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records,
1910-2010
, and
of  
CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity
.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/10/president-obama-threatens-president-putin-nuclear-war.html

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.