Niet
alleen in Europa is de VS bezig met oorlogsvoorbereidingen tegen
Rusland*, maar ook in Azië en dan met name op een aanval tegen
Noord-Korea, ook al zou dit betekenen dat de VS daarmee tevens
een oorlog zal uitlokken met China…….. Ofwel ook dan zitten we in
feite in een derde wereldoorlog…….

De
Britse krant Telegraph heeft hier een artikel over gepubliceerd, waar
Darius Shahtahmasebi over schrijft in een artikel voor Anti-Media.
Hoewel de VS diverse mogelijkheden heeft om te overleggen met
Noord-Korea, heeft deze uiterst gewelddadige terreurentiteit onder het
beest Trump gekozen voor de agressieve benadering, een benadering die
zelden werkt, zoals de geschiedenis laat zien….. Sterker nog: de VS wenst niet meer te onderhandelen met Noord-Korea, zoals onlangs nog eens bleek na een schuiver van Tillerson die verklaarde dat de VS wel overleg wilde, waarop hij onmiddellijk werd teruggefloten door de Trump administratie……..

Het zou
de bedoeling van de VS zijn de ‘kernwapens’ van Noord-Korea te
bemachtigen dan wel uit te schakelen…… Kernwapens tussen
aanhalingstekens, daar er tot nu toe niet één keer gewag werd
gemaakt van nucleaire straling boven de plek van de ondergrondse
kernproeven die Noord-Korea heeft gedaan. Die straling is tot een
paar dagen na een kernproef bovengronds te meten, zelfs door
satellieten en daarvan gaan ‘er dagelijks wel een paar’ over Noord-Korea heen……….

Volgens
de Telegraph is het nog de vraag of de VS deze stap wel durft te
zetten, niet alleen vanwege de zojuist besproken ‘Noord-Koreaanse
kernraketten’, maar ook de eerder genoemde bemoeienis die te
verwachten is van China……..

Als
Noord-Korea inderdaad geen kernwapens heeft, zoals ik sterk vermoed,
is de kans groot dat de VS (die dit moet weten) toch een inval in het
land zal uitvoeren, in de hoop dat China zich afzijdig zal
houden….. De grote militaire oefening van de VS en Noord-Korea in
het begin van deze maand, was gericht op een inval in Noord-Korea en
dat doet het ergste vrezen……..

Lees en
oordeel zelf:

The
US Is Reportedly Preparing a Military Strike Against North Korea

December
27, 2017 at 2:46 pm

Written
by Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA) — According
to the U.K.-based Telegraph,
Donald Trump’s war of words with North Korean president Kim Jong-un
has the potential to spiral into a confrontation. The U.S. is
reportedly drawing up plans for a “bloody nose” military attack
on North Korea.

According
to the Telegraph,
the aim of the strike would be to contain the North’s nuclear
weapons. This is in light of the fact that the U.S. has had multiple
opportunities to
contain North Korea’s nuclear weapons programs diplomatically but
has opted for hostile aggression, instead.

The Telegraph reports
that the White House has “dramatically” stepped up its
preparation for a military solution to the North Korean standoff,
receiving inside information from three “well-placed sources” —two
former U.S. officials and a third figure from within the Trump
administration.

One
of the options entails the U.S. destroying a launch site before North
Korea can conduct another missile test. It would specifically target
a stockpile of weapons.

“The
Pentagon is trying to find options that would allow them to punch the
North Koreans in the nose, get their attention and show that we’re
serious,” a
former U.S. security official briefed on policy told the Telegraph.

Not
surprisingly, the Telegraph’s report said the
Trump administration had Donald Trump’s Syria strike in April in
mind as a blueprint for action against North Korea. In that context,
the move would not be designed to contain or deter North Korea (such
an April-inspired limited strike would achieve nothing) — it
would most likely be aimed at America’s domestic population and the
international community.

Whether
the media will admit it or not, Trump’s Syria strike was a complete
farce. According to
the Russian Ministry of Defense, only 23 of the 59 missiles launched
actually hit the Syrian airbase in what Russia dubbed an inefficient
strike. In fact, barely a day later, the airbase was back in
action, deploying warplanes
to bomb rebel positions in the Homs countryside.

Further,
the U.S. actually gave Russia, Syria’s staunchest backer, prior
notice of the strike well before it was launched. Pentagon spokesman
Captain Jeff Davis said in a statement that
the so-called “deconfliction” channel set up by Russia and the
U.S. in Syria was used to disclose the strike to the Russian side. It
is inconceivable that Russia would not have passed this warning on to
Syria considering Russian personnel are on the ground there.

All
Trump’s April strike did was boost his ratings and improve his
standing in the media for a tiny period of time, as well as
boost stock in Raytheon, the manufacturer of
the Tomahawk missiles used in the attack. The purpose of the strike
could not have been to deter Syria from carrying out chemical weapons
attacks considering Trump ordered it
before he could have possibly received any credible intelligence
linking the Syrian government to the infamous chemical attack at Khan
Sheikhoun.

A
strike against North Korea aimed at doing damage to the country’s
military without prior warning will not be received well by a hostile
country that has demonstrated it has U.S. personnel well
within its strike range. As
Jeffrey Lewis, the director of the East Asia Nonproliferation Program
at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, wrote
on Twitter,
“Mobile
missiles don’t need launch sites, Donald.”

Putting
this statement in context, Business
Insider explained that
North Korea has varied its launch sites, making it harder for the
U.S. to track and intercept missiles.

Missing
from any decent media coverage of this discussion is the little-known
fact that in October of this year, it was reported that
China was practicing bombing Guam, a U.S. territory. There is only
one inference to be drawn from this conduct — China was sending a
direct warning to the U.S. that its personnel will not be immune
should a war emerge on the Korean peninsula.

No
one is disputing that the U.S. could cause some serious damage to the
infrastructure of North Korea, but as Business Insider eerily
noted:

“The
US knows what capabilities it has to counter North Korea, but
not how North Korea would respond…The
bloody-nose scenario comes down to a gamble on
whether North Korea is ready to enter all-out war over a limited
strike.” [emphasis
added]

Rather
than take the gamble, the U.S. could consider a more
productive diplomatic option to dismantle North
Korea’s nuclear program instead, one that would not result in a
nuclear crisis.

Creative
Commons / Anti-Media / Report
a typo