Amnesty
kwam gisteren met de
uitkomsten van een onderzoek in de Syrische stad Raqqa naar het
aantal (massa-) moorden die de VS coalitie daar met bombardementen heeft
begaan…..
Je
weet waarschijnlijk nog wel dat o.a. De VN, een paar ngo’s en een
paar westerse landen de VS opriepen te stoppen met de bombardementen op
de stad. Helaas aan dovemansoren, net als in het Iraakse West-Mosul
ging m.n. de VS gewoon door met bombarderen……….*
Amnesty
spreekt over honderden doden, echter als ik me niet vergis werden er
na de inname van de stad duizenden mensen vermist……. Het is als
in het Iraakse West-Mosul, hoewel men daar na ‘de bevrijding’ hele
huizenblokken heeft gebulldozerd , zonder eerst
de lijken onder het puin vandaan te halen……. Ook daar gaf men toe een honderden burgerslachtoffers te hebben gemaakt, hoewel deskundigen zeggen dat het er
minstens 30.000 moeten zijn……
90%
van de bombardementen op Raqqa (en eerder in het Iraakse West-Mosul) werden door de VS uitgevoerd. Groot-Brittannië
voerde 215 bombardementen uit op Raqqa en als bij eerdere bombardementen van
GB (ook in Irak) stelt de legerleiding dat het geen
burgerslachtoffers heeft gemaakt……. Het is dat ‘t allemaal zo
triest en smerig is, anders zou je je daadwerkelijk doodlachen,
jezus!!
Het aantal doden is moeilijk na te trekken, ten eerste daar men de overledenen binnen 24 uur moet begraven volgens islam voorschriften. Daarnaast waren journalisten niet welkom in Mosul en Raqqa (en andere gebombardeerde steden, bombardementen die volgens het Verdrag van Genève als oorlogsmisdaden moeten worden aangemerkt……)
Weet niet hoe het momenteel met Nederland zit, voeren wij nog
bombardementen uit in Irak en verkenningsvluchten boven Syrië? Zo ja,
dan wordt er in feite in de landen gemoord middels ons belastinggeld
(en met F16 straaljagers, die volgens een aantal ministers uit de
kabinetten Balkenende en Rutte 1 en 2, van ellende uit de lucht zouden vallen…..)…. Vandaar dat we nu de meer dan waardeloze JSF (F35) van
Lockheed Martin gaan kopen, tegen een godsvermogen aan
belastinggeld……..
Syria:
US-led Coalition’s aerial attacks in Raqqa killed hundreds of
civilians – new report
.jpg?9veUhw7uEmTUvOg1D98wL9mxSlyXrfPg&itok=MeWBgSV-)
The
devastation in the city is as bad as any Amnesty has seen in decades
of covering conflicts around the world © Amnesty International
First-hand
investigations in the destroyed city reveal extent of civilian
casualties, as Coalition’s ‘war of annihilation’ decimated
extended families and neighbourhoods
‘On
the ground in Raqqa we witnessed a level of destruction comparable to
anything we’ve seen in decades of covering the impact of wars’ –
Donatella Rovera
City
was blitzed but ISIS fighters were allowed safe passage out of Raqqa
in deal with Coalition and Kurdish forces
UK
carried out 215 airstrikes but claims it killed no civilians
‘The
UK needs to come clean over its role in this carnage’ – Kate Allen
US-led
Coalition forces killed hundreds of civilians – and injured thousands
– in the Syrian city of Raqqa in the process of “liberating” them
from the Islamic State armed group, Amnesty International said in a
new report today, ahead of tomorrow’s one-year anniversary of the
Raqqa offensive.
Amnesty
researchers visited 42 Coalition airstrike sites across the ruined
city and interviewed 112 civilian residents who survived the carnage
while losing loved ones in the attacks.
The
victims highlighted in Amnesty’s report cut across the city’s
socio-economic spectrum and range in age from a one-year-old baby
girl to a man in his 80s.
Their
harrowing stories and immense losses stand in stark contrast to the
Coalition’s repeated claims that they took great pains to minimise
civilian casualties. In September, at the height of the conflict,
Coalition commander US Lt Gen Stephen Townsend wrote that “there
has never been a more precise air campaign in the history of armed
conflict”. Raqqa residents, such as airstrike survivor Munira
Hashish, tell a different story:
“Those
who stayed died and those who tried to run away died. We couldn’t
afford to pay the smugglers; we were trapped.”
She
and her children eventually managed to escape through a minefield “by
walking over the blood of those who were blown up as they tried to
flee ahead of us.”
Raqqa’s
residents were trapped as fighting raged between ISIS militants and
Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) fighters, supported by the
Coalition’s air and artillery strikes. Meanwhile, ISIS mined escape
routes and shot at civilians trying to flee. Hundreds of civilians
were killed: some in their homes, some in the very places where
they’d sought refuge, and others as they tried to escape.
Amnesty’s
research and Raqqa residents’ accounts – detailed in the 70-page
report, ‘War
of annihilation’: Devastating Toll on Civilians, Raqqa –
throw into serious question the Coalition’s insistence that their
forces did enough to minimise civilian harm. The report details four
emblematic cases (see below) of civilian families brutally impacted
by the aerial bombardment.
Between them, they lost 90 relatives and
neighbours – 39 from a single family – almost all killed by Coalition
airstrikes. Amnesty believes the cases are part of a wider pattern
and provide a strong prima facie case that many lethal Coalition air
and artillery strikes were disproportionate or indiscriminate attacks
carried out in violation of international humanitarian law and are
potential war crimes.
Shortly
before the military campaign, US Defence Secretary James Mattis spoke
of a “war of annihilation” against ISIS in Raqqa, and from 6 June
to 12 October 2017 the US-led Coalition operation – involving US,
British and French forces – carried out tens of thousands of
airstrikes. The US military said it fired 30,000 artillery rounds
during the offensive, while its forces are known to have been
responsible for more than 90% of the airstrikes. Much of the city was
destroyed, with countless homes, private and public buildings and
infrastructure reduced to rubble or damaged beyond repair.
Amnesty
has written to defence officials in the USA, UK and France seeking
additional information about the report’s cases and other attacks,
with Amnesty asking about Coalition tactics, specific means and
methods of attack, choice of targets, and precautions taken in the
planning and execution of attacks, and about any investigations
carried out to date.
Donatella
Rovera, a Senior Crisis Response Adviser at Amnesty International,
said:
“The
Coalition’s claims that its precision air campaign allowed it to
bomb ISIS out of Raqqa while causing very few civilian casualties do
not stand up to scrutiny.
“On
the ground in Raqqa we witnessed a level of destruction comparable to
anything we’ve seen in decades of covering the impact of wars.
“A
senior US military official said that more artillery shells were
launched into Raqqa than anywhere since the Vietnam war. Given that
artillery shells have margin of error of over 100 metres, it is no
surprise that the result was mass civilian casualties.
“When
so many civilians are killed in attack after attack, something is
clearly wrong, and to make this tragedy worse, so many months later
the incidents have not been investigated. The victims deserve
justice.”
Four
Raqqa family case studies
The
case of the Badran family illustrates how dire the situation became
for civilians trapped in Raqqa. Over the course of several weeks, 39
family members were killed in four separate Coalition air strikes as
they moved from place to place inside the city, desperately trying to
avoid rapidly shifting frontlines.
“We
thought the forces who came to evict Daesh [ISIS]
would know their business and would target Daesh and
leave the civilians alone. We were naïve. By the time we had
realised how dangerous it had become everywhere, it was too late; we
were trapped,” Rasha Badran told Amnesty. After several attempts to
flee, she and her husband finally managed to escape, having lost
their entire family, including their only child, a one-year-old girl
named Tulip, whose tiny body they buried near a tree.
The
Aswads were a family of hard-working traders in Raqqa. Some of them
stayed behind to protect their belongings from looting, seeking
shelter in their basement. But, on 28 June a Coalition air strike
destroyed the building, killing eight civilians, mostly children.
Another family member lost his life when he stepped on an ISIS mine
when he returned to the city to try to recover the bodies days
later.
Despite
repeated attempts to flee, the Hashish family lost 17 members, mostly
women and children, over a two-week period in August. A Coalition air
strike killed nine, seven died as they tried to flee via a road which
had been mined by ISIS, and two others were killed by a mortar
launched by SDF.
The
fate of the Fayad family illustrates how a Coalition blitz during the
final hours of the battle wiped out entire families in the Harat
al-Badu area of central Raqqa, where ISIS fighters were known to be
using civilians as human shields. The deaths of Mohammed “Abu Saif”
Fayad and 15 family members and neighbours in Coalition airstrikes
early on 12 October seem all the more senseless because, just hours
later, the SDF and the Coalition agreed a deal with ISIS, granting
remaining ISIS fighters safe passage out of Raqqa.
Benjamin
Walsby, an Amnesty International Middle East Researcher, said:
“If
the coalition and their SDF allies were ultimately going to grant
ISIS fighters safe passage and impunity, what possible military
advantage was there in destroying practically an entire city and
killing so many civilians? Raqqa’s civilians are returning home to
ruins, pulling loved ones out of rubble, and facing death or injury
from mines, IEDs and unexploded ordnance. The Coalition’s refusal
to acknowledge its role in creating this catastrophic situation adds
insult to injury.”
UK
forces carried out 215 airstrikes in Raqqa
According
to the Ministry
of Defence,
UK forces carried out 215 airstrikes in Raqqa. Up until last month,
UK ministers had repeatedly claimed that UK forces in Syria and Iraq
had killed no civilians. On 2 May, the Defence Secretary Gavin
Williamson said that
a UK drone missile killed a civilian on a motorcycle in eastern Syria
in March. Amnesty has written to the Ministry of Defence seeking
detailed information over the UK’s airstrikes in Raqqa.
Kate
Allen, Amnesty International UK’s Director, said:
“Civilians
in Raqqa have suffered grievously at the hands of Islamic State, but
they’ve also been imperilled by the Coalition’s disproportionate
aerial attacks.
“The
Coalition’s operations in Raqqa have killed hundreds and injured
thousands of civilians and the UK needs to come clean over its role
in this carnage.“Having conducted more than 200
airstrikes in Raqqa, the UK needs to be able to show that its
targeting was proportionate and that it took proper measures to avoid
unnecessary civilian casualties in its joint operations with the US
and others. Instead of repeating a mantra about there being ‘no
evidence’ of civilian casualties from UK airstrikes, the MoD should
publish proper data about its Raqqa attacks – dates, times,
locations, weapons used and intended targets.
“Crucially,
ministers should explain how the UK has investigated the impact of
its attacks in both Raqqa and Mosul. For example, has the UK carried
out on-the-ground investigations at the sites it bombed and
interviewed survivors and witnesses?
“With
a Defence Committee set to examine Operation Shader, now is the time
for the UK to demonstrate to the British public that the UK’s
military role in Syria and Iraq has been responsible and lawful. The
Government should establish a thorough, impartial investigation into
all allegations of unlawful attacks and civilian casualties from UK
operations in Raqqa and Mosul.”
Operation
Shader is the operational code for the UK’s contribution to the
multinational military operation against the Islamic State armed
group in the Middle East.
=========================
Aan dit bericht van Amnesty is een petitie verbonden, gericht aan Trump, dus voor VS burgers >> hier de link voor VS burgers of andere geïnteresseerden.
* Bij de bevrijding van oost-Aleppo door het Syrische leger, stopten de Russen en dit leger al 2 maanden voor de uiteindelijke bevrijding met bombarderen, juist om burgerslachtoffers zoveel mogelijk te voorkomen…. Hiervoor was amper aandacht in de reguliere westerse media, later herhaalde e.e.a. zich bij de bevrijding van Oost-Ghouta, terwijl dezelfde media (en westerse politici) het uitschreeuwden het onaanvaardbaar te vinden dat Rusland en Syrië die stad bevrijdden van psychopathische moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen, in het westen aangeduid als ‘gematigde rebellen….’
Zie ook: ‘Voorbeeld BBC en AD propaganda inzake Idlib (Syrië)‘
en: ‘VS vermoordde met bombardementen in augustus 433 burgers in Raqqa………. Westerse media alweer stil…….‘
en: ‘Raqqa door VS platgebombardeerd >> reguliere (massa-) media in de VS zijn er trots op……‘
en: ‘Groot Brittannie gooit meer dan 3.400 bommen af, die niet 1 slachtoffer zouden hebben gemaakt……‘
en: ‘Mosul verwoest door VS……...‘
en: ‘US Airstrikes Killing Hundreds of Civilians in Syria’s Raqqa‘
en: ‘Mosul, stad van lijken: vele honderden doden onder het puin‘
en: ‘VS bombardementen op Raqqa moorden hele families uit……….‘
en: ‘Raqqa, een strijd als om West-Mosul, echter met geheel andere media aandacht……….‘
en: ‘Bombarderen was een probleem in Mosul, maar niet bij het nieuwe Iraakse/VS offensief…….‘
en: ‘Kinderen in Irak vermoord middels VS terreur…….‘
en: ‘Honderden burgerslachtoffers in Mosul door VS bombardementen, ofwel grootschalige terreur……‘
en: ‘Mass Media Siege: Comparing Coverage Of Mosul and Aleppo‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)
en: ‘After Mosul’s “Liberation,” Horror of US Siege Continues to Unfold‘ (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling)
en: ‘Mosul, het verschil in berichtgeving vergeleken met de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo………..‘
