Raad van State wenst zich niet met het referendum te bemoeien, maar doet dat tegelijkertijd wel….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het lekenrecht gepeupel van de Raad van State o.l.v. uw ‘koning’ en CDA schoft Piet Hein ‘Schipholbrand’ Donner, een zelfverklaard tegenstander van het referendum, besloot dat het zich niet wil bemoeien met het referendum en tegelijkertijd wel verklaarde dat de regering het referendum mag afschaffen, zonder het volk daarin te kennen via een referendum……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Wie vanaf nu de Raad van State nog serieus neemt, dient zich onverwijld bij een psychiater te melden! (hetzelfde geldt overigens voor D66 kiezers)

Zie ook: ‘Democraten66? Antidemocraten666 is wat men daar echt mee bedoelt!

PS: de partijen in Rutte 3 en dan m.n. D66 zijn niet in de laatste plaats tegen het referendum vanwege de roep om een referendum over de vrijhandelsverdragen TTIP en CETA (waar de laatste al is getekend door de EU…)…… Je zal begrijpen dat het neoliberale afbraakkabinet Rutte 3 (zoals haar voorgangers) pal achter deze verdragen staat, verdragen waarmee de bedrijven macht krijgen over regeringen en de consument het nakijken heeft……. We hebben in Nederland dan ook al jaren een bedrijfsvertegenwoordiging i.p.v. een volksvertegenwoordiging, waarbij de belangen van bedrijven (en welgestelden) voor ‘onze democratische waarden’ gaan……

Het referendum over TTIP en CETA staat nog steeds open, teken ajb en geeft het door!

Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

Alweer dagenlang worden we in het westen voorgelogen over wat er in Ghouta, Syrië gebeurt. De kroon op het gebied van valse voorlichting is weer eens weggelegd voor de BBC World Service radio, een station met ongelofelijk veel luisteraars…..

Afgelopen dinsdag was het de hele dag door anti-Syrie,uh ik bedoel anti-Assad propaganda-bal op de BBC W.S. Oost-Ghouta zou het volgende doelwit zijn van het ‘perfide’ Syrische bewind.

De bronnen voor al deze ongecontroleerde beweringen waren vertegenwoordigers van de aanwezige terreurgroepen in Oost-Ghouta, Al Qaida Syrië (door de VS van de terreurlijst gehaald), al-Nusra een zusterorganisatie van deze psychopaten, de White Helmets, een ondersteunende terreurgroep van al-Nusra en Al Qaida (met hoorspel) en SOHR, het Syrian Observatory voor Human Rights, een organisatie van een gevluchte Syrische misdadiger, gehuisvest in Engeland en ondersteund door de Britse overheid. En wie citeerde de SOHR? Precies al de hiervoor genoemde groepen!!

Oh, vergeet ik nog één heel belangrijke bron: een correspondent (v) van de BBC in Beiroet Libanon……. Deze dame had net zo goed haar verslag vanuit Londen kunnen doen…….

De redactie maakte overigens een kapitale fout, daar in één geluidsfragment een man was te horen, die stelde te hopen dat Oost-Ghouta snel bevrijd zou worden door de reguliere Syrische troepen, daar hij de terreur in zijn stad meer dan zat was!!

Daarover gesproken: men weet NB in het westen om welke terreurgroepen het gaat in Oost-Ghouta en men weet dat deze uiterst gewelddadig optreden tegen de bevolking, waarbij gelovigen van het verkeerde geloof of richting met een ‘een beetje geluk’ worden vermoord……… Waar halen de politici en de reguliere media het lef vandaan zo keihard te liegen, en dat door media en politici die de vuilbek vol hebben van ‘fake news’ (of nepnieuws, wat je wilt)……..

Men durft zelfs de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo aan te halen als voorbeeld voor de slachting in Ghouta. Terwijl er in vergelijking bij de ‘bevrijding’ van West-Mosul door ‘de Iraakse coalitie (o.l.v. de VS) in Irak enorm veel meer doden vielen dan in Oost-Aleppo….. Zo besloten Syrië en Rusland al twee maanden voor de bevrijding van Oost-Aleppo te stoppen met bombardementen om zo burgerslachtoffers te voorkomen, iets waar men in het westen niet over repte……… In West-Mosul ging de VS gewoon door met bombarderen, ondanks meerdere smeekbedes van de VN….. Ook daar was geen belangstelling voor bij de reguliere westerse media en de meeste westerse politici……..

Er werd bij de BBC op die dag zelfs gesteld dat Aleppo ontvolkt is en de burgers zijn gevlucht naar het buitenland, echter na de bevrijding van IS en andere terreurgroepen door het Syrische leger*, trokken de gevluchte burgers in grote getale terug naar de stad………… (niet voor niets ook, dat Assad in 2014 met een grote meerderheid van stemmen werd verkozen tot president, onder zijn beheer was er vrede tussen de verschillende geloven…….)

Verder werden nog opnamen ten gehore gebracht ‘uit een ziekenhuis’, waar de microfoon vlak voor een huilende baby werd gehouden, uiteraard met het commentaar dat ‘Assads troepen’ expres dit ‘kinderziekenhuis’ had aangevallen…. De opnamen kwamen niet van een oorlogscorrespondent maar van de White Helmets, opnamen die men overal in elkaar kan zetten en daar zijn de White Helmets goed in……..

Een ‘hulporganisatie’ uit de VS stelde dat het Syrische bewind elke 24 uur een ziekenhuis bombardeert, dit bericht was te horen op WDR 5………

Het was overigens op de Nederlandse, Franse en Belgische radio al niets beter gesteld met de berichtgeving, walgelijk!

Zoals je zal begrijpen en/of zal hebben vernomen, wordt er met geen woord gerept over de beschietingen door Al Qaida met o.a. raketten en mortiergranaten vanuit Oost-Ghouta op woonwijken in het westen van Ghouta en Damascus; ach als daar slachtoffers bij vallen, inclusief baby’s en oudere kinderen, een kniesoor die daar op let……. Ik vraag me gvd af, waarom Nederlandse jihadstrijders en hun aanhang hier worden vervolgd, als je de politici en media over de situatie in Oost-Ghouta moet geloven, zijn het minstens helden!!

Vreemd is het ontbreken van berichtgeving over de slachtingen die Turkije aanricht in Syrië, blijkbaar is dat ook al niet niet belangrijk, terwijl dit land zich voor de zoveelste keer illegaal op Syrisch grondgebied bevindt, zoals ook de VS en het overgrote deel van de ‘gematigde terreurgroepen’ zich illegaal op Syrische bodem bevinden………

Dan durven landen als de VS, Frankrijk en Israël, die NB Syrië illegaal bombarderen en waar de eerste zich NB illegaal op Syrische bodem bevindt, Iran en Rusland te manen zich uit Syrië terug te trekken, terwijl die zich nu juist volkomen legaal op Syrische bodem bevinden….. Over de VS en Israël gesproken: de aanvallen van deze landen op het Syrische leger zijn als je die analyseert, gericht op het beschermen van terreurgroepen (zo werkt de VS o.a. samen met ‘Al Qaida Syrië….’)

Overigens werd er in Ghouta zogenaamd een gifaanval uitgevoerd in 2013, volgens het westers anti-Syrisch/Russisch propagandatuig, begaan door Assad, een aanval die later na VN onderzoek (zoals daarna keer op keer) aan terreurgroepen werd toegeschreven; valt me nog mee dat men deze ‘hoax’ niet nog een keer van stal haalde……..

Gisteren werd bekend gemaakt dat de Veiligheidsraad van de VN zich voltallig achter een staakt het vuren in Syrië heeft gesteld…… Het is duidelijk dat het Rusland en China dun door de broek loopt….. Ongelofelijk!

Eén ding is zeker: alle ellende in Syrië is te danken aan de VS, dat al vanaf 2006 bezig was met het organiseren van een opstand tegen Assad, waar het einddoel was een staatsgreep tegen Assad uit te lokken…. De redenen daarvoor: o.a. de weigering van Syrië een pijpleiding voor gas vanuit de Golfstaten richting Europa door Syrië toe te staan en natuurlijk de vriendelijke relaties van het regime Assad met Iran…….

Conclusie: alweer worden we zwaar besodemieterd!!

* Het Syrische leger dat door gelovigen van verschillende religies, hand in hand, werd verwelkomd)

Zie ook: CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering

        en: ‘Trumps buitenlandbeleid heeft de wereld naar de rand van WOIII gebracht…….

        en: ‘US Aggression in Syria – an Imperialist Blueprint

        en: ‘Foreign Ministry: Some Western officials are complicit in the crimes of terrorists against civilians in Damascus and its countryside

        en: ‘Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

        en: ‘Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

        en: ‘Goutha haalt de koppen, terwijl de VS Jemen volpropt met wapens t.g.v. de genocide uitgevoerd door Saoedische coalitie……..

        en: ‘BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

        en: ‘Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

        en: ‘VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

        en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en: ‘Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

        en: ‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

         en: ‘SOHR, het orgaan dat door de reguliere media wordt aangehaald i.z. Syrië, is gevestigd in Coventry

PS: het aantal doden in het Iraakse West-Mosul overtreft het aantal doden dat in Oost-Aleppo en andere Syrische steden viel bij bevrijding door het reguliere Syrische leger……. Zelfs dat feit is geen reden voor de reguliere westerse media en politici in te binden met hun blinde kritiek op Syrië…… Voorts is het een normale zaak, dat een soeverein land het eigen grondgebied bevrijd van terreur, stel je iets dergelijks voor in Nederland……….

Beste bezoeker, dat was het voor deze dag, probeer er ondanks alle ellende een mooie dag van te maken, het weer werkt daar gelukkig wel aan mee.

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Timmermans (PvdA neoliberaal) maffe uitspraken deel 2.000: door de Brexit moeten wij meer betalen aan de EU…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Je snapt niet dat Timmermans nog leeft, daar het hem in de loop van de jaren een ongelofelijk aantal keren in de verwaande bol is geslagen. De laatste oprisping van deze kwezel is zijn pleidooi voor hogere bijdragen van de EU-lidstaten, nu GB met de Brexit uit de EU stapt…….

Dus de meer dan 60 miljoen Britten die geen subsidies meer van de EU ontvangen, zijn een reden om de bijdragen te verhogen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Waar haalt deze driedubbel doorgedraaide kweepeer het lef vandaan? Een kleinere EU betekent immers automatisch een lagere inleg per lidstaat!

Het valt me alleszins mee, dat Rutte 3 zich in dergelijke uitlatingen heeft verwoord en heeft gesteld geen (belasting) cent extra in te leggen voor de EU…….. Hoewel ik daar onmiddellijk aan toe moet voegen dat één of twee bezoeken van Rutte aan Brussel deze belofte kan doen stranden, zo heeft deze wanpresterende, onzelfstandige VVD hufter meermaals bewezen……

Voorts begrijpt Timmermans blijkbaar nog steeds niet, dat de Brexit landen als Nederland een fikse bak geld zal kosten, daar GB het tweede exportland van Nederland is…….

Begin trouwens maar eens met het fiks verlagen van de salarissen en onkostenvergoedingen, die de autocratische grofgraaiers als Timmermans in Brussel (en Straatsburg) bij elkaar graaien! Over Straatsburg gesproken: stop eindelijk met de meer dan belachelijke, jaarlijkse peperdure verhuizingen van de EU naar Straatsburg (en terug naar Brussel)! Op zich al een reden om de EU de nek om te draaien)

Timmermans? Ach van de PvdA: grotere hypocrieten en oplichters zijn amper te vinden, tijd dat deze partij volledig van de kaart wordt geveegd!! (graag samen met de volksverlakkers partijen VVD, CDA en D66)

Australië wil milieugroepen en mensenrechtenorganisaties de mond snoeren…..

Australië
wil milieugroepen en mensenrechtenorganisaties de mond snoeren:
‘Leve het fascistische neoliberalisme!’

Hier
wordt ons inspraak onthouden met de afschaffing van het raadgevend
referendum, voorts wordt onze stem steeds minder gehoord in de autocratische, neoliberale EU. In Australië heeft men al een voorsprong op de vorming
van een nazi-staat: de regering Turnbull wil
mensenrechtenorganisaties, milieugroepen als Greenpeace en andere
organisaties die zich inzetten voor een eerlijke samenlevingen een leefbare wereld, het
bestaan onmogelijk maken……

Vergeet
niet dat de opvolgende regeringen in Australië zich al op een
fascistische manier hebben gekeerd tegen mensen die de door de VS
begonnen illegale oorlogen ontvluchten, oorlogen waar godbetert
datzelfde Australië aan meedoet….

Mensen
(vluchtelingen) worden opgesloten in gevangenissen in onherbergzame
gebieden, het liefst op eilanden van andere landen, gevangenissen
waar het aan alles ontbreekt en waar deze mensen in onafzienbare
ellende leven…. Uiteraard schendt Australië daarmee het VN vluchtelingenverdrag, zoals de EU dit ook keer op keer doet, de Turkije deal is daarvan wel het ultieme voorbeeld…… (met ‘een mooie rol’ van de inhumane PvdA opperkwal Timmermans….)

Als je je in Australië verzet tegen deze onmenselijke, smerige gang van zaken, wordt je als verrader en communist afgeschilderd…… (alsof links zijn het slechtste is wat er bestaat, terwijl linkse mensen al meer dan 100 jaar vechten voor een leefbare wereld t.b.v. iedereen die daarop leeft)

Op ander gebied doet Australië ook een flinke duit in de zak: de klimaatverandering en de luchtvervuiling. Sinds een aantal jaren dumpen Australië en de VS (al onder Obama) steenkool tegen afbraakprijzen op de wereldmarkt. Daarvoor bouwt Australië wat de grootste kolenhaven op de wereld moet worden, men graaft zelfs een vaargeul dwars door het Grote Barrièrerif, dit om grote kolenschepen toegang tot die haven te bieden……. En ja, als je je daar tegen verzet, word je door de fascistoïde overheid daar als terrorist afgeschilderd……..

Dan is er nog het Nederlandse visfabrieksschip Margiris, dat omgedoopt tot de Abel Tasman de zeeën rond Australië mag leegvissen (eigenaar de Katwijkse firma: Parlevliet & Van der Plas, goed gereformeerde schoften, die schijt hebben aan gods schepping, maar wel elke zondag vooraan in de kerk zitten te jubelen)

Het
volgende bericht is een oproep van Greenpeace Australië aan het
weldenkende deel van de bevolking zich te wenden tot hun federale
vertegenwoordiger om niet akkoord te gaan met voorliggende wetgeving:

The
Turnbull Government could be about to shut down Greenpeace and every
other not-for-profit organisation in Australia. They want to silence
your voice. 
Act
now.


There
are three draft laws currently on the table that threaten to silence
every single one of us
 –
environmental groups, humanitarian organisations and people like you.

The
Government says the bills are about curbing foreign political
influence, but what they really do is suffocate anyone who speaks out
against the Government – the likes of which you’d expect to see in
an authoritarian regime.

Just
imagine a world without charities. It’s a world where the human
rights abuses and environmental catastrophes we fight against every
day would go unchecked and unpunished. That’s not a world where any
of us want to live. But that’s the world we could wake up to in
just a few weeks’ time, unless we all act together right now.

Email
your Federal Member of Parliament right now to block the bills.

The
Turnbull government is desperate to plough ahead with the Adani coal
mine, and to expand the oil and gas industries – despite what that
means for our neighbours in the Pacific and for our Great Barrier
Reef. They’ve shown us that they’re capable of heinous things for
people and our planet. But right now you’re standing in the way of
all of that. Now, we have to stand together stronger than ever
before.

Greenpeace
is not a brand name – it’s a community of millions of dedicated
people from all walks of life. 


We know the power we have when we work
together and we’re not afraid to use it. That’s people-power –
the very thing these laws are trying to destroy.


Together,
we’ve fought off these attacks before and won, but we don’t have
much time. 
Please,
contact your local Federal Member of Parliament and tell them to
block the bills and protect your democratic rights.

For
a green and peaceful future,

Dom
Rowe

Program
Director, Greenpeace Australia Pacific


P.S.
Greenpeace is 100% independent. That means that we don’t accept a
cent from government or from corporations so we can confront them
when they do the wrong thing by people and the planet without fear of
our funding being cut. These laws are designed to undermine this. 
It
only takes 2 minutes to email your MP. Click here to use our simple
website to defend your right to speak up.

NOTES:

[1] Electoral
Legislation Amendment (Electoral Funding and Disclosure Reform) Bill
2017

[2] Electoral
Legislation Amendment (Electoral Funding and Disclosure Reform) Bill
2017

[3] https://www.greenpeace.org.au/blog/coalbank-commbank-leaving-coal/

[4] http://www.greenpeace.org/australia/en/mediacentre/media-releases/climate/Huge-win-for-Southern-Australia-as-one-of-the-worlds-biggest-polluters-abandons-Bight-oil-drilling-plans/

[5]
 
http://www.greenpeace.org/australia/en/news/oceans/People-power-wins-Super-trawler-banned/

==================================

Zie ook:

Australisch fascistische gevangenisbewind deel 2: een petitie!‘ (daar vind je ook de link naar het eerste deel van dit bericht, dat iets minder relevant is voor het bericht hierboven)

Robert Portier (NOS Radio1): Australië kan niet anders >> dan vluchtelingen inhumaan ‘opvangen……’

2015, aantal verdronken ‘gelukzoekers’: 5.350………….

Koenders weer doodstil: Indonesië, Thailand en Maleisië laten bootvluchtelingen langzaam maar zeker sterven! Wat een geweldige wereld hè mensen??!!!

Wat betreft de visserij, zie:

Ghana: kustwateren leeggevist

Greenpeace Klinckhamers vol lof over leegvissen zeeën….. Polderen tot het oneindige….. Vroege Vogels propaganda…..

Juncker heeft Senegal opgelicht met visserijverdrag

Sylvia Borren (ex-Greenpeace) is blij dat Greenpeace met de grote vissers aan tafel zit……..

Overbevissing groter probleem dan gedacht >> Greenpeace: ‘u mag gerust een visje eten…….

Nederland vist de wereldzeeën leeg

Israëlische militairen slaan en schoppen Palestijn dood op video……..

Israëlische
militairen slaan en schoppen Palestijn dood op video >> hoeveel
bewijs is er nog nodig om de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël aan
de paal te nagelen???

Verdere
woorden zijn wat mij betreft overbodig: lees de Israëlische leugens,
zie de barbaarse fascisten een mens vermoorden en huiver:

Watch:
Palestinian Killed By Israeli Occupation Force Soldiers

By
Tamara Nassar

February
23, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
”  A Palestinian man died after he
was beaten by Israeli soldiers in the occupied West Bank city of
Jericho early Thursday.


Yasin
al-Saradih, 33, was arrested from his house at approximately 2 am,
Eid Barahmeh, head of the Palestinian prisoners club in
Jericho, 
told the
Israeli newspaper 
Haaretz.

Israeli
forces notified the family of al-Saradih’s death two hours later.

The
Israeli military changed its story about the events surrounding
al-Saradih’s death after a video emerged showing soldiers striking
him.

The
video shows a number of soldiers gathered around al-Saradih, some
apparently beating him while he is on the ground. They then drag his
body away. The video does not show al-Saradih posing any threat to
them.

Al-Saradih’s
brother-in-law, Ismail al-Masri, 
told
local media
 that
Israeli soldiers beat al-Saradih “in every part of his body,
especially his stomach and back.”


Prisoners
rights group Addameer and the Palestinian Prisoners Club 
are
calling
 al-Saradih’s
death an extrajudicial killing.

Israeli
occupation forces routinely use excessive force in an unnecessary and
disproportionate manner, which is in violation of international law,”
the groups said.


Issa
Qaraqe, head of the Palestinian Authority’s prisoners affairs
committee, 
told
local radio
 on
Thursday that the cause of al-Saradih’s death was a severe beating
to the head.


Al-Saradih’s
family told 
Haaretz that
he did not suffer from any prior medical issues. They added that he
was not affiliated with any political organizations.

Al-Saradih
had previously been wounded by gunfire in 2002 during the second
intifada.

Changing
story

Before
the video was published, the Israeli military had claimed that
al-Saradih attacked soldiers with a knife and attempted to steal a
gun, 
Haaretz reported.
They also stated that military medics treated al-Saradih on the
scene.

The
military retracted their initial statement and issued another one
after the video emerged.


The
new 
statement alleges
that al-Saradih ran towards soldiers who were carrying out arrests of
“wanted persons” in the city of Jericho and that he tried to
attack them with an iron bar.

The
force responded with gunfire, confronted the terrorist and succeeded
in stopping him,” it states.

It
does not clearly state his cause of death, however.


According
to 
Haaretz,
al-Saradih’s body was taken to Israel’s Abu Kabir Forensic
Institute for an autopsy, but no bullet wounds were found on the
body.

Therefore,
the growing assessment is that the man died from the beating he
sustained from the soldiers,” according to 
Haaretz.


Palestinians
are planning to seek another autopsy in a Palestinian hospital once
al-Saradih’s body is returned, the Palestinian Authority’s
Qaraqe 
told
media
.

It
is unclear how long Israel will withhold his body or whether it will
allow another autopsy.

Impunity

This
is not the first time an official Israeli version of events has had
to be revised following the emergence of video, 
+972
Magazine
 observed.


For
example, Israeli army medic 
Elor
Azarya
* was caught
on video shooting at close range
 injured
and disarmed Palestinian 
Abd
al-Fattah Yusri al-Sharif
 while
he was lying incapacitated on a street in Hebron in March 2016.


+972
Magazine
 characterized
the initial reports as, “Soldier stabbed, assailants killed.”

Everything
changed a few hours later when video of the execution-style killing
was published,” the Israeli news site added.

Israeli
forces killed a second Palestinian during the same incident, Ramzi
Aziz al-Qasrawi, though that slaying was not caught on video.

On
Thursday, Palestinians in Jericho observed a strike to protest
al-Saradih’s killing:

View image on TwitterView image on Twitter

وكالة شهاب

@ShehabAgency

إضراب تجاري في أريحا حداداً على روح الشهيد ياسين السراديح الذي ارتقى اثر اعتداء جنود الاحتلال عليه بشكل وحشي خلال اعتقاله فجر اليوم

Twitter Ads info and privacy

شبكة قدس الإخبارية

@qudsn

إضراب تجاري وإشعال للإطارات المطاطية في شوارع أريحا، حداداً على الشهيد ياسين السراديح.

Addameer
and the Palestinian Prisoner Club called on international bodies to
respond in a way “which seeks accountability from the occupation
authorities.”


However,
even in cases that UN human rights officials have 
termed “shocking”
and “incomprehensible” – such as December’s shooting by
Israeli forces of disabled Palestinian Ibrahim Abu Thurayya**
nothing has been done to pierce Israel’s systematic 
impunity.

This
article was originally published by “
The
Electronic Intifada 

==========================================

*  Bij de labels onder dit bericht aangeduid als: Azaria.

** Bij de labels aangegeven als: I.A. Thurayeh

Zie ook: ‘Gaza ‘On Brink Of Collapse’ As Residents Remain ‘Caged In’‘ (Video)

        en: Israël martelt 60% van de gevangengehouden Palestijnse kinderen……..‘ 

        en: ‘Israël voert standrechtelijke executies uit en martelt kinderen……

Hoeveel misdaden tegen de menselijkheid moet de fascistische apartheidsstaat Israël nog begaan voordat Israël wordt aangeklaagd bij het Internationaal Strafhof (ICC) in Den Haag??? Wereld wordt wakker en boycot deze barbaarse psychopaten!!

Mijn excuus voor de gebrekkige weergave van de Twitterberichten, krijg het niet op orde, hier de link naar het origineel.

De Armeense Genocide: de meer dan slappe Nederlandse regering blijft over de ‘Armeense Kwestie’ spreken……..

Ondanks de enorme terreur die Turkije nu ook in buurland Syrië ten toon spreid en ondanks de zwaar onbeschofte toon van de reli-fascistische dictatuur Erdogan, blijft Nederland spreken van de Armeense Kwestie, i.p.v. deze gigantische Turkse massamoord bij de naam te noemen: de Armeense Genocide……

Ex-‘minister’ en VVD opperknuppel Zijlstra bakte eerder zoete broodjes in Ankara en bood daar zijn  excuus aan voor het tegenhouden van 2 Turkse ministers die hier de ‘Turkse gemeenschap’ wilden manipuleren ten gunste van de kalief van Ankara, Erdogan, dit t.b.v. de vorige verkiezingen in Turkije.

Zoals je al begrepen zal hebben, puur en alleen ingegeven om de Nederlandse handelsbelangen met Turkije veilig te stellen. Echter zonder veel succes, Turkije bleef Nederland schofferen, waarna Nederland officieel haar ambassadeur uit Turkije terugtrok (die overigens al lang in Nederland zat)…….

Nu heeft het uiterst lamme kabinet Rutte 3 besloten, dat er wel een ‘hoogwaardigheidsbekleder’ naar de herdenking van de Armeense Genocide zal gaan, ik meen in Assen. Er wordt gesproken over een minister, maar reken gerust dat dit maximaal een staatssecretaris zal zijn………

De Tweede Kamer erkent eindelijk de Armeense Genocide, maar Rutte 3  blijft van de ‘Armeense kwestie’ spreken…….. Ondanks dat de regering dit niet doet, liet Ankara weten boos te zijn op Nederland….. Het is dat het onderwerp dit niet toelaat, anders zou je je daadwerkelijk doodlachen…..

Schande dat Nederland, ondanks alles wat Erdogan en z’n corrupte reli-fascistische kliek durven te zeggen en te doen, niet durven te spreken over de Armeense Genocide……

Moet je nagaan, dit met de ‘Christen’Unie in het kabinet, de partij die al lang voorvechter is van de vreselijke door de Turken uitgevoerde massamoord te noemen bij de naam die daarbij past: de Armeense Genocide….. Benieuwd hoe deze partij deze totaal belachelijke draai verklaart naar de achterban……

Walgelijk!!

Voor meer berichten over de Armeense Genocide, klik op het betreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.

Blokhuijsen onder druk gezet excuus te maken over opmerking barbaarse dierenmishandeling en eten van honden in Zuid-Korea……..

Schaatser Jan Blokhuijsen had volkomen terecht wel het lef het vreselijke lot van een enorm aantal
honden in Korea in het openbaar te noemen. Alsof het niet al walgelijk genoeg is
honden en katten te eten, worden deze nog gruwelijker gehouden, dan de dieren hier in de intensieve martelveehouderij…… Het ‘best’ is hun lot te
vergelijken met konijnen in deze veehouderij, al worden die zelfs nog beter behandeld dan
honden en katten in Zuid-Korea (China en Indonesië).

Ongelofelijk
dat Blokhuijsen zich zo onder druk heeft laten zetten (o.a. door het
IOC) dat hij later godbetert tot 2 keer toe zijn excuus voor zijn
opmerking maakte……

Ongelofelijk
ook dat de andere leden van het Nederlands team de mond stijf dicht
hebben gehouden over dit enorme, barbaarse schandaal, dat op z’n best past in de donkere Middeleeuwen…. Op zeker
dat daar veel sporters tussen zitten, die zelf een hond of een kat
hebben…….

Het
IOC en alle media aanwezig in Zuid-Korea zouden zich de oren van de
kop moeten schamen, dat men met geen woord heeft vuil gemaakt aan
deze honden- en kattenvlees handel, die gepaard gaat met
ongelofelijke martelingen…..
*


Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Take a stand in Pyeongchang 2018 against the dog and cat meat trade!

De opmerking van Blokhuijsen werd zelfs als discriminerend t.a.v. de Zuid-Koreanen genoemd…… Is het ook discriminerend als je als sporter iets over ernstige mensenrechtenschendingen in bijvoorbeeld de VS zegt…??? Hoe kan een terechte opmerking over zware dierenmishandeling discriminerend zijn? Te zot voor woorden, dat je een ‘cultuur’ van dierenmishandeling niet aan de kaak mag stellen!! 

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Take a stand in Pyeongchang 2018 against the dog and cat meat trade!

De opmerking van Blokhuijsen heeft niets met politiek te maken >> waar bemoeit het autocratische inhumane bestuur van het IOC zich mee???

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Take a stand in Pyeongchang 2018 against the dog and cat meat trade!

Blokhuijsen herhaal jouw opmerking ajb!

Hier de berichtgeving zoals die op NU.nl wordt weergegeven:   

Excuses
Blokhuijsen aan Koreanen na opmerking over behandeling honden

Gepubliceerd: 22 februari 2018
07:52 Laatste update: 22 februari 2018 10:06

Jan
Blokhuijsen heeft donderdag excuses aangeboden voor zijn opmerking na
de olympische ploegachtervolging over de behandeling van honden in
Zuid-Korea.

“Behandel honden
alstublieft beter in dit land”, zei Blokhuijsen woensdag aan het
einde van de persconferentie, nadat hij met de achtervolgingsploeg
brons had gepakt. De schaatser doelde daarmee op het feit dat in
Zuid-Korea nog altijd hondenvlees geconsumeerd wordt.

De opmerking van
Blokhuijsen zorgde voor opschudding onder de Zuid-Koreanen. De
28-jarige Noord-Hollander zou geen weet hebben van de Koreaanse
cultuur en zijn woorden zouden zelfs discriminerend zijn.

“Het was niet
mijn bedoeling jullie land te beledigen”, schrijft Blokhuijsen
donderdag op Twitter in een reactie op de ophef. “Dierenwelzijn
in het algemeen gaat mij aan het hart en ik droom van een betere
wereld voor zowel mens als dier. Ik heb het enorm naar mijn zin op
deze Spelen en wil jullie graag bedanken voor de gastvrijheid.”

In een persverklaring
van NOC*NSF betuigde Blokhuijsen donderdag nogmaals spijt. “Mensen
die mij kennen weten dat ik erg begaan ben met het welzijn van
dieren. Het is een persoonlijke mening die ik niet moet uitdragen
tijdens een persconferentie op de Olympische Spelen.”

Blokhuijsen geeft aan
geen interviews over de kwestie te willen geven. “Het spijt me
dat door mijn opmerking mijn team en Team NL last hebben van de
ophef.”

======================================

‘Last hebben van de ophef…….?” Schande!!

* Zie: ‘Olympische Spelen in Pyeongchang: dierenmishandeling en de handel in honden en kattenvlees……

Zie ook: ‘Nederlands Olympisch team: spreek je uit tegen de Zuid-Koreaanse handel in honden- en kattenvlees! Teken ajb de petitie tegen barbaarse dierenmishandeling!

Washington uit op oorlog met Iran……

De
Trump administratie wil hoe dan ook de ‘Iran nuclear deal’ de nek
omdraaien en eist van de andere deelnemers, vooral die in de EU
dezelfde houding, zonder dat deze administratie daar over wil
discussiëren……….

De
VS wil ‘opnieuw onderhandelen’ over deze overeenkomst met Iran, met
daarin bepalingen waarvan men weet dat Iran hier niet mee akkoord kan
en zal gaan…….

‘Uiteraard’
komt de Trump administratie met het versleten cliché over de Iraanse ongebreidelde agressie….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Een gevalletje de
pot verwijt een piepklein keteltje dat het zwart ziet, waarbij
opgemerkt moet worden dat de VS kleurenblind is (behalve als het om
de repressie tegen de gekleurde bevolking in de VS gaat)……..

Als
er een ‘land’ is dat ongebreidelde agressie gebruikt, is het de VS
wel! Alleen deze eeuw al 4 illegale oorlogen en de regie over een
paar (illegale) oorlogen in Afrika……. Dit nog buiten de door
Washington op poten gezette opstanden die tot een coup hebben geleid
en als dit niet lukte alsnog uitmonden in een (illegale) oorlog, zoals in Syrië,
waar de VS al vanaf 2006 bezig was met het opzetten van een opstand
(die tot een coup moest leiden)……

Kortom
de Trump administratie is bezig met de voorbereiding op een oorlog
tegen Iran (waarvoor de nucleaire leugen tegen Iran overigens maar één
van de ‘redenen’ is…..)…. Het is maar zeer de vraag of Rusland
en China zich afzijdig zullen houden, mocht de VS een illegale oorlog
tegen Iran beginnen….. Als dit niet het geval zal zijn, is een in
volle omvang uitbarsten van WOIII bijzonder dichtbij……

Hoe
is het mogelijk dat men in het westen in de 60er, 70er en 80er jaren
massaal in opstand kwam tegen de terreur van de VS, waar ook toen een
nucleaire oorlog meermaals in de lucht hing, waar men nu doodstil is en de
VS haar gang laat gaan…??? Terwijl het gevaar op een nucleaire
oorlog nu veel groter is dan destijds, immers de VS (en
Groot-Brittannië) spreken nu openlijk over het inzetten van nucleaire
wapens bij een militair conflict, sterker nog: de Trump administratie
dreigt zelfs met nucleaire vergelding als ‘een land’ (Rusland, China
en Noord-Korea) mocht beslissen een ‘cyberaanval’ te beginnen tegen
de VS……. ‘Cyberaanvallen’ zoals de zogenaamde manipulatie van de
VS presidentsverkiezingen, waarvoor tot op heden geen enkel steekhoudend
bewijs is geleverd, maar waar wel een enorm aantal bewijzen liggen voor dit soort van handelingen door de VS zelf in andere landen!!

Washington
Delivers New Ultimatum On Iran

By
Bill Van Auken

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – The US State Department has
issued a fresh ultimatum on the Iran nuclear deal to Washington’s
ostensible major allies in Europe, demanding that Germany, Britain
and France commit themselves to altering the agreement along the
lines demanded by President Donald Trump or face its unilateral
abrogation by the US.


A
secret State Department cable obtained by Reuters presents what are
essentially the same demands made by Trump last January. At that
time, he announced that he was prepared to relaunch all-out US
economic warfare against Iran unless the European powers joined
Washington in imposing a rewritten nuclear accord on Tehran,
including provisions that the Iranian government cannot and will not
accept.


The
occasion for Trump’s threat was his reluctant announcement on
January 12 that he had decided to waive the reimposition of US
sanctions that were lifted as part of the nuclear agreement, formally
known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA). He vowed
that this would be the last time he issued such a waiver, unless his
conditions were met. The next deadline for waiving the sanctions is
May 12.


The
message from the State Department to the European powers asks for
their “commitment that we should work together to seek a
supplemental or follow-on agreement that addresses Iran’s
development or testing long-range missiles, ensures strong IAEA
inspections, and fixes the flaws of the ‘sunset clause.’”


Washington
has demanded that Iran grant International Atomic Energy Agency
inspectors immediate and unlimited access to any site in the country,
including military bases; the elimination of “sunset clauses” in
the JCPOA, making time-limited restrictions on aspects of Iran’s
civil nuclear program permanent; and drastically limiting, if not
outlawing, Iran’s ballistic missile program.


While
presented by Reuters and other media as a softening of the position
outlined by Trump in January, the cable makes it clear that the US is
continuing to present its nominal allies in Europe with an ultimatum.



In
the absence of a clear commitment from your side to address these
issues, the United States will not again waive sanctions in order to
stay in the Iran nuclear deal. If at any time the President judges
that such commitment is not within reach, the President indicated he
would end US participation in the deal.”


The
cable’s “talking points” for US diplomats to advance
Washington’s agenda in Europe stress “the Trump administration’s
strategy to counter the Iranian regime’s reckless aggression,”
which “addresses the full range of Iranian threats, of which Iran’s
nuclear program is only one element.”


The
clear implication is that Washington is embarked on a trajectory of
war with Iran, either with or without the collaboration of its NATO
allies in Berlin, London and Paris. Should they join with the US in
ripping up the nuclear accord, it will set them on a collision course
not only with Iran, but also with Russia and China, the two other
signatories to the JCPOA.


The
US has spelled out its own intentions in the Trump administration’s
recent National Security Strategy, lumping Iran together with North
Korea under the category of “rogue states” that represent a
threat to US “national interests” and are to be confronted and
defeated.


None
of the European powers responded directly to the US cable, which the
State Department itself refused to discuss. Asked about the US
demands in an online media briefing, the French Foreign Ministry
declared: “The French position on the Iran nuclear deal is known.
As the President of the Republic [Emmanuel Macron] has said, we
reaffirm our full attachment to the global action plan and its strict
implementation.” It added that Paris would “continue to talk
about the Iran nuclear program with our European and American
partners.”


The
European powers are pursuing their own imperialist interests in the
Middle East and are increasingly at odds with US interests and
strategies. The lifting of sanctions against Iran was greeted by
European corporations as an opportunity to generate a fresh stream of
profits through billions of dollars in new investments and trade
deals. Many of these plans remain unfulfilled because of concerns
that the US will target companies with unilateral sanctions, and that
their investments could go up in smoke in the event of a new and
catastrophic US war in the Middle East.


While
hostile to Iran’s growing influence in the region, the European
powers are increasingly alarmed at the prospect that Washington’s
strategy of forging a regional anti-Iranian alliance with Israel and
Saudi Arabia, together with the other Sunni Gulf oil sheikdoms, will
produce a military confrontation that could cut off oil supplies upon
which Europe depends and unleash a political and refugee crisis that
will spill onto the continent.


Washington
has issued its latest ultimatum in the midst of an explosive
escalation of regional tensions, driven in the main by US and Israeli
aggression. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu spelled out Tel
Aviv’s aggressive stance against Iran in a bellicose speech to the
Munich Security Conference on Sunday. Holding up what he claimed was
a piece of an Iranian drone shot down over Israeli-occupied Syrian
territory in the Golan Heights, he denounced Iran as “the greatest
threat to the world,” equating it with Nazi Germany.



We
will act without hesitation to defend ourselves, and we will act if
necessary not just against Iran’s proxies that are attacking us,
but against Iran itself,” said Netanyahu, in a clear threat to
attack Iran, an action that his government would undertake only with
US backing.

Israel
responded to the alleged overflight of the drone, which Tehran
insists was launched by independent Syrian militia elements in Syria,
by targeting Iranian personnel in Syria with air strikes. Syrian air
defense units succeeded in shooting down an Israeli F-16 fighter jet,
the first such loss for the Israeli Air Force since the early 1980s.

Speaking
in response to Netanyahu at the Munich conference, Mohammad Javad
Zarif, the Iranian foreign minister, attributed the frenzied tone of
Netanyahu’s speech to the downing of the warplane. “The so-called
invincibility of [Israel] has crumbled,” he said.

The
US military and intelligence apparatus and its loyal stenographers in
the US corporate media are churning out continuous war propaganda
against Iran.

Speaking
at the Munich Security Conference on Saturday, US national security
advisor Gen. H.R. McMaster declared it was necessary to “act
against Iran,” which he accused of arming a “network of proxies”
that is “becoming more and more capable as Iran seeds more and
more…destructive weapons into these networks.”


The New
York Times
 published
a lengthy piece Monday based on interviews with Israeli military
officers and government officials along with representatives of US,
Israeli and Saudi-funded think tanks alleging that Iran is “creating
an infrastructure [in Syria] to threaten Israel.” Needless to say,
the article made no mention of Israel’s own funding and aid for
Sunni Islamist militias attacking the Syrian government of President
Bashar al-Assad.


The
same issue of the 
Times carried
an opinion piece by US ambassador to the United Nations Nikki Haley
claiming, falsely, that a report issued by the United Nations proved
that Iran has shipped missiles to the Houthi rebels in Yemen to fire
at Saudi Arabia. The actual report found that “remnants” of the
missiles were of Iranian origin, while providing no evidence as to
how they got there.

Haley
insists that the world must “act before a missile hits a school or
a hospital and leads to a dangerous military escalation that provokes
a Saudi military response.”

The
column echoes the “big lie” methods pioneered by Nazi Minister of
Propaganda Joseph Goebbels. 


That Saudi Arabia has been bombing Yemeni
schools, hospitals, neighborhoods and infrastructure for nearly three
years, killing some 13,000 Yemeni civilians and plunging the
country’s population into the worst humanitarian crisis on the
planet, goes unmentioned.


Haley
is also silent on the fact that the US has provided the vast majority
of the bombs and missiles dropped on the Yemeni people, while
mounting logistical and refueling operations that make the mass
slaughter possible.

This
article was originally published by “
WSWS

Copyright
© 1998-2018 World Socialist Web Site

Zie
ook: ‘The Coming Wars to End AllWars‘ 
geschreven door Edward Curtin:

The
Trump and Netanyahu governments have a problem: How to start a
greatly expanded Middle-Eastern war without having a justifiable
reason for one. 

===============================================

PS: ben het niet eens met Auken wat betreft de opstelling van de EU, als zou de EU haar eigen imperialistische belangen najagen in het Midden-Oosten, waar hij de ‘Iran deal’ als voorbeeld noemt. Uiteraard blijven de andere partijen die voor deze deal tekenden, geloven in deze deal, dit daar de Trump administratie (zoals gewoonlijk) met een hele bak leugens komt om deze deal de nek om te draaien….. Wat dit met imperialisme te maken heeft zie ik niet. Verder lopen de meeste EU landen blindelings aan achter de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde: de VS………..

Zie ook: ‘Rex Tillerson (VS BuZA) geeft toe dat de VS een staatsgreep wil uitvoeren in Iran…….. Het is nog ‘iets te rustig’ in dat gebied……..

       en: ‘Lt. General McInerney says Obama helped build ISIS with Weapons from Benghazi

       en: ‘VS liegt schaamteloos om het westen verder op te zetten tegen Iran……..

      en: ‘Iraanse protesten allesbehalve compleet spontaan (zoals VS ambassadeur bij de VN Haley durfde te stellen…)….

       en: ‘Protesten Iran opgezet door de VS en Israël

       en: ‘Iran, de protesten en wat de media je niet vertellen………

       en: ‘De VS gaf meer dan 1 miljoen dollar uit om protesten tegen Iraans bewind uit te buiten (en te organiseren)

       en: ‘Het verborgen motief achter de Israëlische agressie tegen Iran en Syrië

       en: ‘VS bewandelt dezelfde weg richting Iran, als die voor de illegale oorlog tegen Irak in 2003, aldus één van de verantwoordelijken voor die oorlog……..

       en: ‘Netanyahu vergelijkt Iran met nazi-Duitsland en stelt dat Iran een bedreiging is voor de wereldvrede….. ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Oliemaatschappijen weigeren n.a.v. VS sancties de jet van Iraanse minister af te tanken

       en: ‘Israël bezig met voorbereiding op meerdere fronten oorlog…….. (met hulp van de VS

       en: ‘John Bolton heeft beloofd dat Iran voor 2019 onder een ander regime zal leven…….

        en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië dreigt Iran aan te vallen voor vanuit Jemen afgevuurde ‘raketten’ op Saoedische ‘doelen……….’

       en: ‘VS rechter gelast Iran miljarden te betalen aan de families van 911 slachtoffers…..

       en: ‘Iran moet hangen en Iran-deal moet van tafel……. Israël speelt wolf in schaapskleren

       en: ‘Iran het volgende slachtoffer van ongebreidelde VS terreur

Trumps buitenlandbeleid heeft de wereld naar de rand van WOIII gebracht…….

Volkomen
terecht waarschuwt Darius Shahtahmasebi de wereld voor het gevaar van
het ‘buitenlandbeleid’ dat de Trump administratie voert.

Met
veel voorbeelden geeft Shahtahmasebi aan dat de VS ons op de rand van
Wereldoorlog III heeft gebracht en er niet veel voor nodig is om deze
oorlog daadwerkelijk te laten losbarsten……

Waar blijven de demonstraties tegen het terreurbeleid van de VS, die ons steeds dichter bij WOIII brengen???

Verdere
woorden overbodig, lees en oordeel zelf:

How
Donald Trump’s Policies Have Brought Us to the Brink of World War 3

February
20, 2018 at 11:55 

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed) — On
February 7, 2018, the U.S.-led coalition in Syria
 conducted
air and artillery strikes
 against
what were believed to be pro-government forces in response to an
“unprovoked attack” launched by these pro-regime troops. Not long
after, reports
 began
emerging
 that
significant numbers of Russian personnel were included in the over
100 dead and wounded. While Russia denied this at first, eventually,
the accepted version of events on both sides was that there were some
Russian nationals who did lose their lives in Syria. These Russians
are arguably mercenaries and contractors, not official troops.

This
is not the first time the U.S.-led coalition has struck
pro-government forces in Syria. Aside from Donald Trump’s 
grandiose
strike
 on
a Syrian airbase in April of last year, U.S. forces also 
conducted
multiple strikes
 against
Syrian and Iranian-backed forces as these factions began to encircle
the American military’s presence at a base in al-Tanf.

Donald
Trump has famously relaxed the
 Obama-era
restrictions
 on
calling in airstrikes, meaning commanders on the battlefield can call
in airstrikes at their disposal without any oversight. Previously, an
airstrike could not be launched on a whim and was required to go
through certain protocols before it could be delivered. Now, even
associated forces can call in American airstrikes on the battlefield.
The most infamous example of this is when Iraqi commanders called in
a U.S. strike that ended up killing well over
 200
civilians in a single bombardment
.

Barely
a week after Trump’s Syria strike in April, the U.S.
military
 dropped a
$450,000 bomb in Afghanistan dubbed the “Mother of all bombs”
(MOAB). It soon transpired that the decision to drop the bomb was not
made by Trump himself as commander-in-chief but by
 Gen.
John Nicholson
,
commander of the U.S. forces in Afghanistan.

It’s
time to ask yourself: Are you comfortable with commanders on the
battlefield calling in airstrikes even if those airstrikes could
potentially kill personnel on the ground belonging to another nuclear
power?

Last
Tuesday, Wisconsin Democrat Mark Pocan
 told
the 
Nation
 that “Congress
has never authorized force against Syrian, Turkish, Yemeni Houthi,
Russian, Iranian, or North Korean forces. Yet reportedly, a 
secret
administration memo may claim the legal justification to do just
that: attack Syrian, North Korean, and other forces without any
congressional authorization.” 
[emphasis
added]

According
to 
Lawfare
,
a lawsuit required the government to reveal a list of documents
relating to the April Syria strike, but not the actual documents
themselves. The court-ordered directions forced the government to
reveal that the seven-page secret memo Pocan was referring to was
drafted up by administration lawyers on April 6, 2017, just before
Trump’s infamous strike. The government’s declarations revealed
that only a few of the words on one of the memo’s pages are
classified, and they are related to facts, not legalities. Still, the
administration refuses to disclose the memo to the public, claiming
the document is exempt from the Freedom of Information Act.

I
am also concerned that this legal justification may now become
precedent for additional executive unilateral military action,
including this week’s U.S. airstrikes in Syria against pro-Assad
forces or even an extremely risky ‘bloody nose’ strike against
North Korea,”
 Senator
Tim Kaine (D-Va) said last week.

In
early February, the Pentagon released its much anticipated
2018
 Nuclear
Posture Review
.
From the 
Washington
Post’s 
Katrina
vanden Heuvel’s 
assessment:

The
review reaffirms the United States is ready to use nuclear weapons
first in an alarmingly wide range of scenarios. It remains ‘the
policy of the United States to retain some ambiguity regarding the
precise circumstances’ that might lead to a nuclear response. The
United States 
reserves the right to unleash
nuclear weapons first in ‘extreme circumstances’ to defend the
‘vital interests’ not only of the United States but also of its
‘allies and partners’ — a total of some 30 countries.
 ‘Extreme
circumstances,’ the review states explicitly, include 
significant
non-nuclear attacks,’ including conventional attacks on ‘allied
or partner civilian population or infrastructure.’ 
The
United States also 
maintains a ‘portion of
its nuclear forces’ on daily alert, with the option of launching
those forces ‘promptly.’ 
[emphasis
added]

The
U.S. has an active stockpile of at least 4,000 nuclear weapons,
rivaled only by Russia. 
According
to the Physicians for Social Responsibility (PSR)
,
a “limited” regional exchange of nuclear weapons could force one
billion people to the point of starvation, and a week-long “regional”
encounter could kill far more than died during World War II.

As
Albert Einstein
 famously
said
, “I
know not with what weapons World War III will be fought, but World
War IV will be fought with sticks and stones.”

Heuvel
correctly summarized the current nuclear strategy:

In
sum, the United States is building a new generation of nuclear
weapons and delivery systems, will deploy more usable nuclear weapons
in ‘forward’ areas, remains committed to possible ‘first use’
of nuclear weapons even against non-nuclear attacks in defense of 30
countries, retains missiles on active alert ready to launch, is
skeptical of the possibility of any progress in arms control and is
hostile to the global movement to make nuclear weapons illegal. All
this as tensions with Russia and China rise, relations with North
Korea remain literally explosive, and the nuclear deal with Iran
stays under constant assault from the president.

One
thing we do know is that the U.S. is
 openly
considering nuclear strikes
 in
response to cyber-attacks, which could be conducted by anyone from
lone-wolf hackers to
 Iran,
North Korea, Russia, or China. We also know that the Trump
administration has been weighing a “limited” 
strike
on North Korea
 for
some time now, even as North and South Korea pursue a peaceful
dialogue of their own. Even now, the U.S. continues
to 
position nuclear-capable
B-52 and B-2 bombers around the Korean peninsula. The B-2 is the most
advanced bomber in the United States air force, capable of dropping
the military department’s biggest bomb, which weighs in at around
14,000 kilograms.

This
is a recipe for disaster. Donald Trump isn’t bringing the troops
home and focusing on “making America great again.” According to
the
 Department
of Defense
,
American troop deployments to the Middle East had increased 33
percent by the end of last year.

It’s
time for both sides of the political coin to confront their delusions
and face reality. Donald Trump is by far the
 most
hawkish, trigger-happy president
 to
have ever been sworn into office, which is no easy feat considering
his predecessors. His policies are leading the United States down a
dangerous path that could see a miscalculated strike on Syria,
Russia, Iran, North Korea, or even China — whether by mistake or by
design. Considering that strikes have already been underway in Syria
against the Syrian government and its allies, including Russia, these
policies are likely to lead to something far more explosive down the
line.

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

=============================

PS: heb een bericht over de situatie in het Syrische Ghouta in voorbereiding. Ghouta waar de enorme westerse hysterie en hypocrisie in de reguliere media weer eens heeft toegeslagen, dit gesteund door het grootste deel van de westerse politici, terwijl men weet dat de moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen van Al Qaida, al-Nusra (in feite ‘Al Qaida Syrië’) en als het even kan de White Helmets tekeer gaan tegen de bevolking……. Waar is de kritiek op terreurgroep Al Qaida gebleven?? Alle berichten over ‘de slachting’ in Ghouta komen dan ook van die terreurgroepen en van Al Qaida’s White Helmets, met door hen geregisseerde video’s en hoorspelen……. Bij deze (op 25 februari 2018): ‘Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld