De VS draait de Iran-deal deels terug……..

Gisteren op Information Clearing House het bericht, dat het Huis van Afgevaardigden in de VS een streep wil zetten, door een contract dat Boeing met Iran sloot over de levering van vliegtuigen.

Deze deal voor 100 vliegtuigen, heeft een waarde van 25 miljard dollar. Het Huis vindt de deal te riskant, zo zou Iran onderdelen uit die vliegtuigen kunnen gebruiken, voor andere doeleinden of vliegtuigen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja logisch, je koopt een passagiersvliegtuig voor een smak geld, alleen om onderdelen te bemachtigen voor andere vliegtuigen, of bijvoorbeeld een vliegende bom te maken, alsof Iran die onderdelen bijvoorbeeld niet veel simpeler kan kopen in China, waar men al jaren kampioen namaken is………

Gevreesd moet worden, dat dit de zoveelste hap van de VS uit het verdrag met Iran wordt, iets dat men in Israël zal vieren met hectoliters champagne……. Hoeveel een deal met Iran ook kan opleveren, het blijft klein bier, vergeleken met de winsten die het militair-industrieel complex in de VS maakt, tja en die winsten komen in gevaar als er vrede ‘dreigt…..’

‘Pikant detail’: Boeing maakt met haar civiele tak passagiersvliegtuigen, maar is tegelijk ook onderdeel van van het militair-industrieel complex! Een woordvoerder van het bedrijf heeft al laten weten, dat iedereen die een contract afsloot met Iran, kan rekenen op tegenwerking van het Huis van Afgevaardigden……….

Ben benieuwd hoe dit zal aflopen, al vrees ik, zoals gezegd, dat het verdrag met Iran uiteindelijk zal sneuvelen, immers naast de immense lobby voor het militair-industrieel complex, is de Israël-lobby nergens groter dan in de VS……….. Zoals u wellicht weet: Israël was zwaar verontwaardigd over het verdrag tussen de VS en Iran…….

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Koenders en Ploumen: Nederland moet lid worden van de VN Veiligheidsraad, alsof de VS het niet zelf af zou kunnen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Vandaag wordt er beslist, of Nederland een paar jaar voor spek en bonen mag meedoen aan de VN Veiligheidsraad. Daarvoor heeft Nederland al meer dan 2 jaar over de wereld gelobbyd, wat daar de kosten van zijn, mag ‘joost’ weten, maar gelooft u mij maar, dat zal een niet misselijk bedrag zijn…….

Aan die kosten werd de laatste dagen nog een enorm bedrag toegevoegd, door de ‘persoonlijke’ lobby van PvdA hufters Ploumen en Koenders, die in New York, op de goede afloop, nog even de reet likten van VN diplomaten en ambassadeurs…….

Nederland loopt in alles achter de VS aan, en dat al voor een aantal decennia. De VS is een vaste partner in de VN Veiligheidsraad, dus met vetorecht (lees: elk voorstel dat de VS niet zint, wordt middels een veto ‘weggestemd’)…… Wat denkt Nederland nog voor de VS te kunnen doen…?? ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Op BNR na het nieuws van 9.30 u. vanmorgen de voormalige diplomaat Herman Schaper, die een paar jaar lang de wereld rondreisde om voor een Nederlandse zetel in de Veiligheidsraad te lobbyen. Of hij denkt dat zijn peperdure reizen zin hebben gehad. Reizen die ongetwijfeld waren voorzien van veel cadeaus en diners voor de over te halen politici….. Dat wist Schaper niet, zeker daar veel politici die hij van e.e.a. voorzag, al (-lang) de politiek hebben verlaten, zo luidde het antwoord…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Met andere woorden: nee, zinloze belastinggeld verspilling!!

Vroeg vanmiddag was Dick Leurdijk van het militair-industrieel lobby instituut Clingendael te horen bij BNR’s Annette van Soest. Deze flapdrol vindt het wel belangrijk dat Nederland een plaats krijgt in de VN Veiligheidsraad, al weet hij niet of alle inzet daartoe, o.a. van Schaper, Ploumen en Koenders wel zin hebben gehad……

Leurdijk vindt het zo belangrijk (die plek in de Veiligheidsraad), dat hij toegaf dat Nederland weinig of niets zal kunnen betekenen in die raad…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Deze drollenpoetser stelde even later, dat een Nederlandse stem in de Veiligheidsraad wel degelijk cruciaal kan zijn…… ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, je kan alle kanten op met Leurdijk en dat in een paar minuten tijd!!! ‘Cruciaal’, mits één van de vijf vaste leden geen veto uitspreekt, zal Leurdijk bedoelen!!

Volgens Leurdijk waren zonder de VN, de sancties tegen Iran niet opgeheven…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Zonder de VS zal de zakkenwasser bedoelen!! Waar ik nog aan toe zou willen voegen, dat er nog veel te veel sancties tegen Iran overeind zijn gebleven, ook weer dankzij de VS………

Jezus mensen, wat een onzin en nogmaals: wat een zinloos verspild belastinggeld, zelfs al zou Nederland een paar jaar voor spek en bonen mee mogen doen in de VN Veiligheidsraad………

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.

Nazimoordenaar werkte na WOII voor de Mossad…!!!

Het volgende artikel komt van OSNetDaily. Hierin de geschiedenis van Otto Skorzeny, een SS nazi moordenaar, die in de rang van luitenant-kolonel door Hitler werd beloond met het ridderkruis behorend tot het ijzeren kruis. Deze opperschoft trad na WOII in dienst van de Mossad, de Israëlische geheime dienst!!

Op deze plek heb ik al eens geschreven over de officieren uit het Israëlische leger, die begin 90er jaren naar buiten kwamen met het bericht, dat zij uit SS lesboeken werden onderwezen, bijvoorbeeld hoe een getto (zoals de Gazastrook nu is) te beheersen en controleren…….

Het is een lap tekst mensen, maar meer dan de moeite waard!!!

Declassified: Iconic Nazi Commando Otto Skorzeny Became Mossad Hitman

1-948

Otto Skorzeny, one of the Mossad’s most valuable assets, was a former lieutenant colonel in Nazi Germany’s Waffen-SS and one of Adolf Hitler’s favorites.
On September 11, 1962, a German scientist vanished. The basic facts were simple: Heinz Krug had been at his office, and he never came home.
The only other salient detail known to police in Munich was that Krug commuted to Cairo frequently. He was one of dozens of Nazi rocket experts who had been hired by Egypt to develop advanced weapons for that country.
HaBoker, a now defunct Israeli newspaper, surprisingly claimed to have the explanation: The Egyptians kidnapped Krug to prevent him from doing business with Israel.
But that somewhat clumsy leak was an attempt by Israel to divert investigators from digging too deeply into the case — not that they ever would have found the 49-year-old scientist.
We can now report — based on interviews with former Mossad officers and with Israelis who have access to the Mossad’s archived secrets from half a century ago — that Krug was murdered as part of an Israeli espionage plot to intimidate the German scientists working for Egypt.
Moreover, the most astounding revelation is the Mossad agent who fired the fatal gunshots: Otto Skorzeny, one of the Israeli spy agency’s most valuable assets, was a former lieutenant colonel in Nazi Germany’s Waffen-SS and one of Adolf Hitler’s personal favorites among the party’s commando leaders. The Führer, in fact, awarded Skorzeny the army’s most prestigious medal, the Knight’s Cross of the Iron Cross, for leading the rescue operation that plucked his friend Benito Mussolini out from the hands of his captors.
But that was then. By 1962, according to our sources — who spoke only on the promise that they not be identified — Skorzeny had a different employer. The story of how that came to be is one of the most important untold tales in the archives of the Mossad, the agency whose full name, translated from Hebrew, is “The Institute for Intelligence and Special Missions.”
Key to understanding the story is that the Mossad had made stopping German scientists then working on Egypt’s rocket program one of its top priorities. For several months before his death, in fact, Krug, along with other Germans who were working in Egypt’s rocket-building industry, had received threatening messages. When in Germany, they got phone calls in the middle of the night, telling them to quit the Egyptian program. When in Egypt, some were sent letter bombs — and several people were injured by the explosions.
Krug, as it happens, was near the top of the Mossad’s target list.
During the war that ended 17 years earlier, Krug was part of a team of superstars at Peenemünde, the military test range on the coast of the Baltic Sea, where top German scientists toiled in the service of Hitler and the Third Reich. The team, led by Wernher von Braun, was proud to have engineered the rockets for the Blitz that nearly defeated England. Its wider ambitions included missiles that could fly a lot farther, with greater accuracy and more destructive power.
According to Mossad research, a decade after the war ended, von Braun invited Krug and other former colleagues to join him in America. Von Braun, his war record practically expunged, was leading a missile development program for the United States. He even became one of the fathers of the NASA space exploration program. Krug opted for another, seemingly more lucrative option: joining other scientists from the Peenemünde group — led by the German professor Wolfgang Pilz, whom he greatly admired — in Egypt. They would set up a secret strategic missile program for that Arab country.
In the Israelis’ view, Krug had to know that Israel, the country where so many Holocaust survivors had found refuge, was the intended target of his new masters’ military capabilities. A committed Nazi would see this as an opportunity to continue the ghastly mission of exterminating the Jewish people.
The threatening notes and phone calls, however, were driving Krug crazy. He and his colleagues knew that the threats were from Israelis. It was obvious. In 1960, Israeli agents had kidnapped Adolf Eichmann, one of the chief administrators of the Holocaust, in far-off Argentina. The Israelis astonishingly smuggled the Nazi to Jerusalem, where he was put on trial. Eichmann was hanged on May 31, 1962.
It was reasonable for Krug to feel that a Mossad noose might be tightening around his neck, too. That was why he summoned help: a Nazi hero who was considered the best of the best in Hitler’s heyday.
On the day he vanished, according to our new information from reliable sources, Krug left his office to meet Skorzeny, the man he felt would be his savior.
Skorzeny, then 54 years old, was quite simply a legend. A dashing, innovative military man who grew up in Austria — famous for a long scar on the left side of his face, the result of his overly exuberant swordplay while fencing as a youth— he rose to the rank of lieutenant colonel in Nazi Germany’s Waffen-SS. Thanks to Skorzeny’s exploits as a guerrilla commander, Hitler recognized that he had a man who would go above and beyond, and stop at nothing, to complete a mission.
The colonel’s feats during the war inspired Germans and the grudging respect of Germany’s enemies. American and British military intelligence labeled Skorzeny “the most dangerous man in Europe.”
Krug contacted Skorzeny in the hope that the great hero — then living in Spain — could create a strategy to keep the scientists safe.
The two men were in Krug’s white Mercedes, driving north out of Munich, and Skorzeny said that as a first step he had arranged for three bodyguards. He said they were in a car directly behind and would accompany them to a safe place in a forest for a chat. Krug was murdered, then and there, without so much as a formal indictment or death sentence. The man who pulled the trigger was none other than the famous Nazi war hero. Israel’s espionage agency had managed to turn Otto Skorzeny into a secret agent for the Jewish state.
After Krug was shot, the three Israelis poured acid on his body, waited awhile and then buried what was left in a hole they had dug beforehand. They covered the makeshift grave with lime, so that search dogs — and wild animals — would never pick up the scent of human remains.
The troika that coordinated this extrajudicial execution was led by a future prime minister of Israel, Yitzhak Shamir, who was then head of the Mossad’s special operations unit. One of the others was Zvi “Peter” Malkin, who had tackled Eichmann in Argentina and in later life would enter the art world as a New York-based painter. Supervising from a distance was Yosef “Joe” Raanan, who was the secret agency’s senior officer in Germany. All three had lost large numbers of family members among the 6 million Jews murdered by the cruel, continent-wide genocide that Eichmann had managed.
Israel’s motivation in working with a man such as Skorzeny was clear: to get as close as possible to Nazis who were helping Egypt plot a new Holocaust.
The Mossad’s playbook for protecting Israel and the Jewish people has no preordained rules or limits. The agency’s spies have evaded the legal systems in a host of countries for the purpose of liquidating Israel’s enemies: Palestinian terrorists, Iranian scientists, and even a Canadian arms inventor named Gerald Bull, who worked for Saddam Hussein until bullets ended his career in Brussels in 1990. Mossad agents in Lillehammer, Norway, even killed a Moroccan waiter in the mistaken belief that he was the mastermind behind the 1972 Munich Olympics massacre of 11 Israeli athletes by the terrorist group known as Black September. Ahmed Bouchikhi was shot down in 1973 as he left a movie theatre with his pregnant wife. The Israeli government later paid compensation to her without officially admitting wrongdoing. The botched mission delayed further Mossad assassinations, but it did not end them.
To get to unexpected places on these improbable missions, the Mossad has sometimes found itself working with unsavory partners. When short-term alliances could help, the Israelis were willing to dance with the proverbial devil, if that is what seemed necessary.
But why did Skorzeny work with the Mossad?
He was born in Vienna in June 1908, to a middle-class family proud of its military service for the Austro-Hungarian Empire. From an early age he seemed fearless, bold and talented at weaving false, complex tales that deceived people in myriad ways. These were essential requirements for a commando officer at war, and certainly valuable qualities for the Mossad.
He joined Austria’s branch of the Nazi Party in 1931, when he was 23, served in its armed militia, the SA, and enthusiastically worshipped Hitler. The führer was elected chancellor of Germany in 1933 and then seized Austria in 1938. When Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and World War II broke out, Skorzeny left his construction firm and volunteered — not for the regular army, the Wehrmacht, but for the Leibstandarte SS Panzer division that served as Hitler’s personal bodyguard force.
Skorzeny, in a memoir written after the war was over, told of his years of SS service as though they were almost bloodless travels in occupied Poland, Holland and France. His activities could not have been as innocuous as his book made them seem. He took part in battles in Russia and Poland, and certainly the Israelis believed it was very likely that he was involved in exterminating Jews. The Waffen-SS, after all, was not the regular army; it was the military arm of the Nazi Party and its genocidal plan.
His most famous and daring mission was in September 1943: leading commandos who flew engineless gliders to reach an Italian mountaintop resort to rescue Hitler’s friend and ally, the recently ousted Fascist dictator Benito Mussolini and spirit him away under harrowing conditions.
This was the escapade that earned Skorzeny his promotion to lieutenant colonel — and operational control of Hitler’s SS Special Forces. Hitler also rewarded him with several hours of face-to-face conversation, along with the coveted Knight’s Cross. But it was far from his only coup.
In September 1944, when Hungary’s dictator, Admiral Miklos Horthy, a Nazi ally, was on the verge of suing for peace with Russia as Axis fortunes plunged, Skorzeny led a contingent of Special Forces into Budapest to kidnap Horthy and replace his government with the more hard-line Fascist Arrow Cross regime. That regime, in turn, went on to kill or to deport to concentration camps tens of thousands of Hungarian Jews who had managed to survive the war up to that point.
Also in 1944, Skorzeny handpicked 150 soldiers, including some who spoke fair to excellent English in a bold plan to fend off the Allies after they landed in Normandy on D-Day in June. With the Allies advancing through France, Skorzeny dressed his men in captured U.S. uniforms, and procured captured American tanks for them to use in attacking and confusing Allied troops from behind their own lines.
The bold deception — including the act of stealing U.S. soldiers’ property — plunged Skorzeny into two years of interrogation, imprisonment and trial after the war ended. Eventually, Allied military judges acquitted him in 1947. Once again, the world’s newspapers headlined him as Europe’s most dangerous man. He enjoyed the fame, and published his memoirs in various editions and many languages, including the 1957 book “Skorzeny’s Special Missions: The Autobiography of Hitler’s Commando Ace,” published by Greenhill Books. He spun some tall-tale hyperbole in the books, and definitely downplayed his contacts with the most bloodthirsty Nazi leaders. When telling of his many conversations with Hitler, he described the dictator as a caring and attentive military strategist.
There was much that Skorzeny did not reveal, including how he escaped from the American military authorities who held him for a third year after his acquittal. Prosecutors were considering more charges against him in the Nuremberg tribunals, but during one transfer he was able to escape — reputedly with the help of former SS soldiers wearing American military police uniforms.
Skorzeny’s escape was also rumored to have been assisted by the CIA’s predecessor agency, the Office of Special Services, for which he did some work after the war. It is certainly notable that he was allowed to settle in Spain — a paradise for Nazi war veterans, with protection from the pro-Western Fascist, Generalissimo Francisco Franco. In the years that followed he did some advisory work for President Juan Peron in Argentina and for Egypt’s government. It was during this period that Skorzeny became friendly with the Egyptian officers who were running the missile program and employing German experts.
In Israel, a Mossad planning team started to work on where it could be best to find and kill Skorzeny. But the head of the agency, Isser Harel, had a bolder plan: Instead of killing him, snare him.
Mossad officials had known for some time that to target the German scientists, they needed an inside man in the target group. In effect, the Mossad needed a Nazi.
The Israelis would never find a Nazi they could trust, but they saw a Nazi they could count on: someone thorough and determined, with a record of success in executing innovative plans, and skilled at keeping secrets. The seemingly bizarre decision to recruit Skorzeny came with some personal pain, because the task was entrusted to Raanan, who was also born in Vienna and had barely escaped the Holocaust. As an Austrian Jew, his name was originally Kurt Weisman. After the Nazis took over in 1938, he was sent — at age 16 — to British-ruled Palestine. His mother and younger brother stayed in Europe and perished.
Like many Jews in Palestine, Kurt Weisman joined the British military looking for a chance to strike back at Germany. He served in the Royal Air Force. After the creation of Israel in 1948, he followed the trend of taking on a Hebrew name, and as Joe Raanan he was among the first pilots in the new nation’s tiny air force. The young man rapidly became an airbase commander and later the air force’s intelligence chief.
Raanan’s unique résumé, including some work he did for the RAF in psychological warfare, attracted the attention of Harel, who signed him up for the Mossad in 1957. A few years later, Raanan was sent to Germany to direct the secret agency’s operations there — with a special focus on the German scientists in Egypt. Thus it was Raanan who had to devise and command an operation to establish contact with Skorzeny, the famous Nazi commando.
The Israeli spy found it difficult to get over his reluctance, but when ordered, he assembled a team that traveled to Spain for “pre-action intelligence.” Its members observed Skorzeny, his home, his workplace and his daily routines. The team included a German woman in her late 20s who was not a trained, full-time Mossad agent but a “helper.” Known by the Hebrew label “saayanit” (or “saayan” if a male), this team member was like an extra in a grandly theatrical movie, playing whatever role might be required. A saayanit would often pose as the girlfriend of an undercover Mossad combatant.
Internal Mossad reports later gave her name as Anke and described her as pretty, vivacious and truly flirtatious. That would be perfect for the job at hand — a couples game.
One evening in the early months of 1962, the affluent and ruggedly handsome — though scarred — Skorzeny was in a luxurious bar in Madrid with his significantly younger wife, Ilse von Finckenstein. Her own Nazi credentials were impeccable; she was the niece of Hjalmar Schacht, Hitler’s talented finance minister.
They had a few cocktails and were relaxing, when the bartender introduced them to a German-speaking couple he had been serving. The woman was pretty and in her late 20s, and her escort was a well-dressed man of around 40. They were German tourists, they said, but they also told a distressing story: that they had just survived a harrowing street robbery.
They spoke perfect German, of course, the man with a bit of an Austrian accent, like Skorzeny’s. They gave their false names, but in reality they were, respectively, a Mossad agent whose name must still be kept secret and his “helper,” Anke.
There were more drinks, then somewhat flamboyant flirting, and soon Skorzeny’s wife invited the young couple, who had lost everything — money, passports and luggage — to stay the night at their sumptuous villa. There was just something irresistible about the newcomers. A sense of sexual intimacy between the two couples was in the air. After the four entered the house, however, at a crucial moment when the playful flirting reached the point where it seemed time to pair off, Skorzeny — the charming host — pulled a gun on the young couple and declared: “I know who you are, and I know why you’re here. You are Mossad, and you’ve come to kill me.”
The young couple did not even flinch. The man said: “You are half-right. We are from Mossad, but if we had come to kill you, you would have been dead weeks ago.”
Or maybe,” Skorzeny said, “I would rather just kill you.”
Anke spoke up. “If you kill us, the ones who come next won’t bother to have a drink with you, You won’t even see their faces before they blow out your brains. Our offer to you is just for you to help us.”
After a long minute that felt like an hour, Skorzeny did not lower his gun, but he asked: “What kind of help? You need something done?” The Mossad officer — who even now is not being named by colleagues — told Skorzeny that Israel needed information and would pay him handsomely.
Hitler’s favorite commando paused for a few moments to think, and then surprised the Israeli by saying: “Money doesn’t interest me. I have enough.”
The Mossad man was further surprised to hear Skorzeny name something that he did want: “I need for Wiesenthal to remove my name from his list.” Simon Wiesenthal, the famous Vienna-based Nazi-hunter, had Skorzeny listed as a war criminal, but now the accused was insisting he had not committed any crimes.
The Israeli did not believe any senior Nazi officer’s claim of innocence, but recruiting an agent for an espionage mission calls for well-timed lies and deception. “Okay,” he said, “that will be done. We’ll take care of that.”
Skorzeny finally lowered his weapon, and the two men shook hands. The Mossad man concealed his disgust.
I knew that the whole story about you being robbed was bogus,” Skorzeny said, with the boastful smile of a fellow intelligence professional. “Just a cover story.”
The next step to draw him in was to bring him to Israel. His Mossad handler, Raanan, secretly arranged a flight to Tel Aviv, where Skorzeny was introduced to Harel. The Nazi was questioned and also received more specific instructions and guidelines. During this visit, Skorzeny was taken to Yad Vashem, the museum in Jerusalem dedicated to the memory of the 6 million Jewish victims of the Holocaust. The Nazi was silent and seemed respectful. There was a strange moment there when a war survivor pointed to Skorzeny and singled him out by name as “a war criminal.”
Raanan, as skilled an actor as any spy must be, smiled at the Jewish man and softly said: “No, you’re mistaken. He’s a relative of mine and himself is a Holocaust survivor.”
Naturally, many in Israeli intelligence wondered if the famous soldier for Germany had genuinely — and so easily — been recruited. Did he really care so much about his image that he demanded to be removed from a list of war criminals? Skorzeny indicated that being on the list meant he was a target for assassination. By cooperating with the Mossad, he was buying life insurance.
The new agent seemed to prove his full reliability. As requested by the Israelis, he flew to Egypt and compiled a detailed list of German scientists and their addresses.
Skorzeny also provided the names of many front companies in Europe that were procuring and shipping components for Egypt’s military projects. These included Heinz Krug’s company, Intra, in Munich.
Raanan continued to be the project manager of the whole operation aimed against the German scientists. But he assigned the task of staying in contact with Skorzeny to two of his most effective operatives: Rafi Eitan and Avraham Ahituv.
Eitan was one of the most amazing characters in Israeli intelligence. He earned the nickname “Mr. Kidnap” for his role in abducting Eichmann and other men wanted by Israeli security agencies. Eitan also helped Israel acquire materials for its secret nuclear program. He would go on to earn infamy in the 1980s by running Jonathan Pollard as an American Jewish spy in the United States government.
Surprisingly flamboyant after a life in the shadows, in 2006, at age 79, Eitan became a Member of Parliament as head of a political party representing senior citizens.
Yes, I met and ran Skorzeny,” Eitan confirmed to us recently. Like other Mossad veterans, he refused to go on the record with more details.
Ahituv, who was born in Germany in 1930, was similarly involved in a wide array of Israeli clandestine operations all around the globe. From 1974 to 1980 he was head of the domestic security service, Shin Bet, which also guarded many secrets and often conducted joint projects with the Mossad.
The Mossad agents did try to persuade Wiesenthal to remove Skorzeny from his list of war criminals, but the Nazi hunter refused. The Mossad, with typical chutzpah, instead forged a letter — supposedly to Skorzeny from Wiesenthal— declaring that his name had been cleared.
Skorzeny continued to surprise the Israelis with his level of cooperation. During a trip to Egypt, he even mailed exploding packages; one Israeli-made bomb killed five Egyptians in the military rocket site Factory 333, where German scientists worked.
The campaign of intimidation was largely successful, with most of the Germans leaving Egypt. Israel stopped the violence and threats, however, when one team was arrested in Switzerland while putting verbal pressure on a scientist’s family. A Mossad man and an Austrian scientist who was working for Israel were put on trial. Luckily, the Swiss judge sympathized with Israel’s fear of Egypt’s rocket program. The two men were convicted of making threats, but they were immediately set free.
Prime Minister David Ben-Gurion, however, concluded that all of this being out in public was disastrous to Israel’s image — and specifically could upset a deal he had arranged with West Germany to sell weapons to Israel.
Harel submitted a letter of resignation, and to his shock, Ben-Gurion accepted it. The new Mossad director, commander of military intelligence Gen. Meir Amit, moved the agency away from chasing or intimidating Nazis.
Amit did activate Skorzeny at least once more, however. The spymaster wanted to explore the possibility of secret peace negotiations, so he asked Israel’s on-the-payroll Nazi to arrange a meeting with a senior Egyptian official. Nothing ever came of it.
Skorzeny never explained his precise reasons for helping Israel. His autobiography does not contain the word “Israel,” or even “Jew.” It is true that he sought and got the life insurance. The Mossad did not assassinate him.
He also had a very strong streak of adventurism, and the notion of doing secret work with fascinating spies — even if they were Jewish — must have been a magnet for the man whose innovative escapades had earned him the Iron Cross medal from Hitler. Skorzeny was the kind of man who would feel most youthful and alive through killing and fear.
It is possible that regret and atonement also played a role. The Mossad’s psychological analysts doubted it, but Skorzeny may have genuinely felt sorry for his actions during World War II.
He may have been motivated by a combination of all these factors, and perhaps even others. But Otto Skorzeny took this secret to his grave. He died of cancer, at age 67, in Madrid in July 1975.
He had two funerals, one in a chapel in Spain’s capital and the other to bury his cremated remains in the Skorzeny family plot in Vienna. Both services were attended by dozens of German military veterans and wives, who did not hesitate to give the one-armed Nazi salute and sing some of Hitler’s favorite songs. Fourteen of Skorzeny’s medals, many featuring a boldly black swastika, were prominently paraded in the funeral processions.
There was one man at the service in Madrid who was known to no one in the crowd, but out of habit he still made sure to hide his face as much as he could. That was Joe Raanan, who by then had become a successful businessman in Israel.
The Mossad did not send Raanan to Skorzeny’s funeral; he decided to attend on his own, and at his own expense. This was a personal tribute from one Austrian-born warrior to another, and from an old spy handler to the best, but most loathsome, agent he ever ran.
Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet vor de labels: Amit, Ben-Gurion, Ranaan, Skorzeny, von Braun en W. Pilz. Het aantal labels is veel te weinig, helaas kan ik daar niets aan veranderen (maximaal 200 tekens, of 20 labels).

Assad, de 2006 plannen voor de omverwerping van zijn bewind………

Al vaker hier aangekaart: de westerse aanzet tot de opstand in Syrië. In het volgende artikel van Information Clearing House (ICH), wordt zelfs het jaar 2006 genoemd, als het jaar waarin de eerste aanzet tot de omverwerping van het Assad regime werd voorbereid (voor een vertaling, die wel wat tijd in beslag neemt, kan u onder dit artikel op Dutch klikken):


Divide et Impera

The Imperialist Violence in Syria, Part 3 of 7 – Part 1

By Kim Petersen and B. J. Sabri


From The WikiLeaks Files:


A December 13, 2006 cable, “Influencing the SARG [Syrian government] in the End of 2006,” indicates that, as far back as 2006 – five years before “Arab Spring” protests in Syria – destabilizing the Syrian government was a central motivation of US policy. The author of the cable was William Roebuck, at the time chargé d’affaires at the US embassy in Damascus. The cable outlines strategies for destabilizing the Syrian government. In his summary of the cable, Roebuck wrote:

We believe Bashar’s weaknesses are in how he chooses to react to looming issues, both perceived and real, such as the conflict between economic reform steps (however limited) and entrenched, corrupt forces, the Kurdish question, and the potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists. This cable summarizes our assessment of these vulnerabilities and suggests that there may be actions, statements, and signals that the USG can send that will improve the likelihood of such opportunities arising.

This cable suggests that the US goal in December 2006 was to undermine the Syrian government by any available means, and that what mattered was whether US action would help destabilize the government, not what other impacts the action might have. In public the US was in favor of economic reform, but in private the US saw conflict between economic reform and “entrenched, corrupt forces” as an “opportunity.” In public, the US was opposed to “Islamist extremists” everywhere; but in private it saw the “potential threat to the regime from the increasing presence of transiting Islamist extremists” as an “opportunity” that the US should take action to try to increase.


Roebuck lists Syria’s relationship with Iran as a “vulnerability” that the US should try to “exploit.” His suggested means of doing so are instructive:

Possible action:

PLAY ON SUNNI FEARS OF IRANIAN INFLUENCE: There are fears in Syria that the Iranians are active in both Shia proselytizing and conversion of, mostly poor, Sunnis. Though often exaggerated, such fears reflect an element of the Sunni community in Syria that is increasingly upset by and focused on the spread of Iranian influence in their country through activities ranging from mosque construction to business….

Roebuck thus argued that the US should try to destabilize the Syrian government by coordinating more closely with Egypt and Saudi Arabia to fan sectarian tensions between Sunni and Shia, including by the promotion of “exaggerated” fears of Shia proselytizing of Sunnis, and of concern about “the spread of Iranian influence” in Syria in the form of mosque construction and business activity.

By 2014, the sectarian Sunni-Shia character of the civil war in Syria was bemoaned in the United States as an unfortunate development. But in December 2006, the man heading the US embassy in Syria advocated in a cable to the secretary of state and the White House that the US government collaborate with Saudi Arabia and Egypt to promote sectarian conflict in Syria between Sunni and Shia as a means of destabilizing the Syrian government. At that time, no one in the US government could credibly have claimed innocence of the possible implications of such a policy…

It was easy to predict then that, while a strategy of promoting sectarian conflict in Syria might indeed help undermine the Syrian government, it could also help destroy Syrian society. But this consideration does not appear in Roebuck’s memo at all, as he recommends that the US government cooperate with Saudi Arabia and Egypt to promote sectarian tensions.1


From the US Congress


The US path to destroy Syria is long. On 12 April 2003, twenty-four days after the US invasion of Iraq, a Zionist representative from New York, Eliot T. Engle, sponsored the Syria Accountability Act (SAA). The charge was Syria’s involvement of terrorism, aiding Saddam Hussein (meaning Iraq) escaping sanctions, helping the insurgency against the US invasion of Iraq, supporting of Hezbollah, chemical weapons, and so on. (We have to go on record on an important issue. Saying “a Zionist representative” is not a vacuous namedropping—it is a political statement indicative of how Israel passes its policy aims in Syria and the Arab world through the American legislative system.) The Act was passed in December 2003. Invoking the omnipresent pretext of American national security and pretending “constitutional” presidential privileges on foreign policy, George Bush essentially turned the Israeli policy toward Syria into a policy of the United States. (For reading: Statement by the President on H.R. 1828)

In his article, “The Syria Accountability and Lebanese Sovereignty Restoration Act of 2003: Two Years On,” David Schenker, from the Zionist-imperialist think tank, the Washington Institute, recalled his experience in testifying before the House of Representatives (7 June 2006). He wrote, “Syria has proven a tough nut to crack. The SAA has helped, although the Legislation itself is not sufficient to compel a change in Syrian behavior. The Bush Administration has adopted some steps, but the challenge is how to leverage the SAA in conjunction with other tools at the Administration’s disposal—multilateral efforts in particular—to ratchet up the pressure on Syria to force behavioral change.” “Ratchet up pressure” is the key phrase as to what US neocons/Zionists believe they must do in Syria, not only in connection to Lebanon, but also, obviously, in relation what Syria represents for Israel—a rejectionist state of Israel that must be destroyed.


The Assassination of Rafiq Hariri


The assassination of Rafiq Hariri (a billionaire, dual citizen of Saudi Arabia and Lebanon, and a former prime minister of Lebanon) on 14 February 2005 is the paramount example of how the United States, Western Europe, and Israel plan their subversion against the Arab states that do not obey US diktat, or resist US-backed Israeli colonialist-imperialism. The assassination offers a very interesting angle with regard how pretexts are developed and used. Let us see why Hariri was killed. On 2 September 2004, the UNSC issued resolution 1559 calling on Syria to withdraw its remaining forces from Lebanon. Syria complied but only partially and slowly.

The ruse to get Syria out of Lebanon—which was a part of Greater Syria in history until France, using its Sykes-Picot mandate over Syria, severed it and made it an independent state in 1943—had, therefore, to be achieved by other means. The assassination of Hariri was that specific means. With the accusation that Syria was behind the assassination, the stage was set to force Syria’s complete withdrawal from Lebanon under the threat of enforcing resolution 1559 by military means. Forty-five days after the assassination (5 April 2005), Syria began its withdrawal from Lebanon and completed it by the end of that month.


Who ordered the assassination of Hariri?


Since neither Syria nor Hezbollah had stakes in the assassination of Hariri, who benefited from it? Our logical answer is Israel and the United States. [2] Considering the long list of objectives of these two states in the situation of all Arab states, proving this assertion is a matter of deductive reasoning.

Having briefly described the path the United States took in the quest to destabilize Syria, it is important to see its current methods of war. If the US plans in Syria were insufficient to raise alarm, we have to deal with other features applied on the Syrian theater of death (and before that in Afghanistan and Iraq). We are talking about an imperialist instrument of war: vocabulary as a weapon of mass confusion. Many terms and phrases had been coined to make people conform to Washington’s indoctrination. But do terms such as “moderate,” “extremist,” “moderate Arab states—who are they?”, “Islamic,” Islamist,” “dictator,” “democracy,” “no role for Assad in the future of Syria,” “Sunni,” “Alawite,” “Shiite,” “ISIS,” “stop the Iranian occupation of Syria,” “IS,” “DAESH,” “U.S. hitting ISIS,” etc., have any tangible meaning outside the world of imperialist propaganda?


Let us examine some of these terms. Does the diction “a future for Syria without Assad” have any meaning? Would that be a re-made Syria with a bankrupt sectarian system similar to the one a criminal named George W. Bush and his Zionist neocons installed in Iraq? Would the US bring Noah Feldman or others to write a “constitution” for Syria? (Feldman is a Zionist lawyer from New York and a theoretician on “Islamic terrorism,” “Jihad,” and on so-called Islamic democracy. He authored the sectarian constitution for Iraq while this was under active US military occupation led by Paul Bremer. Bremer’s constitution, as the Iraqis call it, has become the cornerstone and foundation for the partition of Iraq on approximate confessional and ethnic lines.3


Or, would it be a so-called Islamic state swearing allegiance to US imperialism, to Al Saud, and to the British-installed al-Thani ruling family of Qatar? What is the implication of saying that Assad is the problem, yet names behind state policies such as Obama, Erdogan, Hollande, Merkel, Turki al-Faisal, or Bandar Bin Sultan go unmentioned in this context? What does the Syrian “moderate opposition” mean in the US imperialist lexicon, if not groups financed and supported by Washington? And for clarity’s sake, we ask, moderate in what?


Again, what is the US game in Syria?


Let us cite Condoleezza Rice. Rice is the quintessential dual-face American hypocrite when the issue is US interventions. Although the first quotation we cite below is about Iraq, its philosophy and intent applies to US policy in Syria.

Rice, describing in petty melodramatic terms (similar to those one can find in a cheap romance novel) how she confronted her master criminal boss on the sectarian violence that the United States designed and implemented in Iraq, wrote the following [Italics are ours]:

“So what’s your plan, Condi?” The president was suddenly edgy and annoyed. “We’ll just let them kill each other, and we’ll standby and try to pick the pieces?”

I was furious at the implication….”No, Mr. President,” I said, trying to stay calm. “We just can’t win by putting our forces in the middle of their blood feud. If they want to have a civil war we’re going to have to let them.”4

Comment: 1) Rice is shameful. She made her criminal boss look caring. 2) Rice, daughter of a Presbyterian minister who presumably taught her not to lie, lied big. First, calling sectarian infighting “civil war” is deception because these are two different entities. Sectarian strife within a nation pits a community against another with dissimilar beliefs or ethnic origins. Civil conflict is between political factions within a nation regardless of sectarian or confessional beliefs. The US uses both terms interchangeably to obfuscate the nature of its interference in the pursuit of specific policy objectives.

Besides, there never was any sectarian infighting between Arab Sunni and Shiite Muslims in Iraq until the US invasion and occupation fomented it to preempt resistance to its occupation. 3) Rice and her neocon masters thrive when sectors of a nation they occupy engage in violent infighting—it provides them easier means of control. This happened in the Philippines, Korea, Viet Nam, Iraq, and it is now happening in Libya and Syria through mercenaries and proxies. That is why we often hear US imperialists and Arab stooges talking about things like “Assad wants to make an Alawite state,” “ISIS is a fact,” “Kurds want their own state and so do the Assyrians and the Armenians,” and so on. Regardless of terminology or concepts, the US strategy is unexceptional—it is an ancient Roman imperial and military strategy: Divide et Impera.


With regard to how US duality works in the Syrian example, let us consider the exchange she had with Syrian Foreign Minister, Walid Muollem:

“… I delivered my point about Syria’s interference in Lebanon, and its failure to stop terrorists in their country from crossing their borders into Iraq.”

“it’s hard to stop them,” he said, but I was having none of it.

“They’re coming through Damascus airport,” I countered.5

Comment: We know what US exceptionalism means: it is okay for the US to interfere in the affairs of every country in the world, but others are not permitted to do so except with US approval. It is not okay that volunteers cross Syria into Iraq to fight the US invasion force, but it is okay for America’s stooges to allow weapons and mercenaries to Syria through Turkish and Jordanian airports.


In recalling the documented history of US interference in the affairs of myriad countries including its staunchest ally Britain (read, “Harold Wilson, Lyndon Johnson and the Vietnam War, 1964-68”), the present authors state the following:

The violence in Syria is not an accidental product of uncontrolled events, is not a result of a civil war, is not because the Syrian state is ruled by despotic elites—but it is a result of a combined American-Israeli geopolitical strategy to install a new Syrian regime at the order of Tel Aviv and Washington. Syria, therefore, is not but another link—after Iraq, Libya, and Yemen— in the US and Israeli quest to dismantle the Arab system of nation, and to end the Palestinian Question permanently.


Let us now examine what was cooking in the US pot against Syria 60 years ago. In his outstanding research on the CIA plotting and machinations against the Arab nations including Syria during the 1950s, California State University history professor, Hugh Wilford, wrote the following:

On August 21, 1956, Foster Dulles convened GAMMA, a top-secret task force with representatives from State, Defense, and the CIA … GAMMA’s main contribution was to agree to a proposal to send the eminent foreign service veteran Loy Henderson on a tour of the Middle East that seemed intended to incite military aggression against Syria by its Arab neighbors…. Henderson told a meeting in the White House that he had discovered a deep sense of anxiety about Syria in the region, yet little concerted will to act; only Turkey, a NATO ally, showed much appetite for intervention….”6


Let us fast forward to the US occupation of Iraq. On page 473 of his book, The Twilight War(Penguin Press, New York, 2012), David Crist (a historian from the US imperialist establishment) writes, “’Recock’ became the word of the day at CENTCOM. The United States would get out of Iraq and prepare for the next war in the global fight against terrorism, with rumors circulating that Syria was next. The U.S. military concurred.”

Why Syria “was next” on the US list of priorities? Has Syria ever harmed or threatened the national security of the United States? No. But because Israel strongly influences US foreign policy (read, John J. Mearsheimer and Stephen M. Walt, “The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy”) toward the Arab states, and because Syria is the last Arab state resisting Israeli imperialism there are two concrete answers.7

First, Israel wants to weaken Syria and dismember it, as it wanted done to Iraq by American neocon Zionists. Dismembering Syria should expose the Lebanese resistance movement Hezbollah that depends on Syria for support. The second is more complex. First, controlling Syria enters in the logic of American quest of global hegemony. Second, to carve out a Kurdish autonomous region to be joined with the areas controlled by Iraqi Kurds creating a Kurdish State potentially at the service of US imperialism and Israel.8, 9 Third, Syria’s eastern regions and Israeli-occupied Golan Heights have sizeable oil deposits. (Read, “World powers must recognize Israeli annexation of Golan Heights”; “Huge oil discovery in Golan Heights – Israeli media”). 4) From an imperialist perspective, the geopolitical re-design of the region would help expand plans for the strategic control of world resources and distribution.


Crist’s revelation impels us to reflect on the motives and ideologies that underlie all anti-Arab actions taken by the United States. What we have today in Syria (and Iraq, Yemen, Sudan, Libya, and Palestine) is an accurate reproduction of age-old tested policies by the West at the expense of nations targeted for reasons rooted in the politics of imperialism, colonialism, Zionism, and piracy of resources. In Syria, however, the situation is a little bit more intricate due to the presence of a long list of operators never seen before in a single regional war, not even in Afghanistan.


Kim Petersen is a former editor of the Dissident Voice newsletter. He can be reached atkimohp@inbox.com

B. J. Sabri is an observer of the politics of modern colonialism, imperialism, Zionism, and of contemporary Arab issues. He can be reached at b.j.sabri@aol.com

Next: Part 4 of 7

NOTES


  1. See Kim Petersen, “Syria in the Imperialist Crosshairs,” Dissident Voice, 26 October 2005.
  2. Note: since the dawn of Islam in Iraq (early 7th century) until the US invasion (2003), and regardless what administrative geopolitical form distinguished it, there have never been confessional lines in all Arab regions of Iraq or ethnic lines separating the various communities. However, historically, and during the rule of the Ottoman Turks, Arab Shiite Muslims formed a relative majority in the South of Iraq and Sunnis in the rest. After WWII, the lines between Arab Shiite and Sunni Muslims became integrated due to internal migrations and economic development. The US deliberately created the lines when it imposed a No-Fly Zone on specific regions of Iraq in 1991 after the war for Kuwait. As for the Kurdish regions, with the exception of Sulaymaniya and Erbil with a Kurdish Majority, most of the north of Iraq was inhabited by a mixture of ethnic Groups including Arabs, Assyrians, Armenians, Turkoman, Kurds, and Yezidis. The US arbitrarily delineated Kurdish areas when it imposed the non-fly Zone on the north of Iraq in 1991.
  3. Condoleezza Rice, No Higher Honor, Crown Publishers, New York, 2011, p. 544, 561
  4. Rice, 561
  5. Hugh Wilford, America’s Great Game: The CIA’s Secret Arabists and the Shaping of the Modern Middle East, Basic Books, New York, 2013, p. 273
  6. Note: Lebanon cannot be described as a resister state. Resistance to Israel in Lebanon follows confessional lines. 1) The Saudi-controlled faction led by Saad Hariri is in line with the policy of accommodation adapted by Al Saud vs. Israel. 2) Christians are divided in two camps: the Faranjia and Aoun camp that opposes Israel; and the Geagea and Jmail (supported by Saudi Arabia) that seeks accommodation and had very close relations with Ariel Sharon and Menachem Begin during the Israeli invasion of Lebanon). The Jumblatt Druze faction (supported by Al Saud) has been known for continuous zigzagging on the issue of the resistance to Israel. This leaves only Hezbollah as the real opponent of Israeli settler-imperialism. Outside the Arab world, Iran is the only other remaining state that opposes Israel.
  7. The Kurdish Question in Iraq goes beyond the scope of this work. Succinctly, there is a US-Kurdish connection in the context of imperialism, dependency; Iraqi Kurdish politician Masoud Barzani has collaborated in turning a potential Kurdish state into a tool at the service of US imperialism and Israel.
  8. In his article, “To defeat ISIS, Create a Sunni State,” John Bolton stated, “The Kurds still face enormous challenges, with dangerously uncertain borders, especially with Turkey. But an independent Kurdistan that has international recognition could work in America’s favor.” [Italics added]
Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.

Zie ook: ‘Jan Jaap de Ruiter (Tilburg ‘University’): Assad is een groter gevaar dan IS…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

en: ‘Koenders: ‘Assad moet terecht staan in Den Haag………’ OEI!!!

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt. Dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Hezbollah’.

Jemen: revalidatiecentrum blinden gebombardeerd; zomaar een oorlogsmisdaad van Saoedi-Arabië……

Afgelopen woensdag meldde BBC World Service (radionieuws), dat Saoedi-Arabië op dinsdagmorgen jl. een blinden instituut in Sanaa (Jemen) heeft gebombardeerd. Volgens de BBC zijn daar alleen gewonden bij gevallen. Dat mag je hopen, het nieuws werd slechts een paar keer herhaald en op de Nederlandse landelijke nieuwsradiozenders en internetpagina’s was er niets over te horen of te lezen……….

Weer werd duidelijk gemaakt, dat zelfs de publieke omroepzender Radio1, waar je toch onafhankelijkheid van bijvoorbeeld de NOS mag verwachten, liever niet wordt gerept over de oorlogsmisdaden van Saoedi-Arabië en als het even kan, worden die berichten uit het nieuws gehouden…….

Schande!!!

Zie ook: ‘Jemenitische rebellen en Iran slachtoffer van internationale leugens, aanvankelijk zelfs uit VN burelen……..

en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië begaat oorlogsmisdaden, een bericht over de verzwegen oorlog in Jemen…….

en: ‘Saoedische terreurcoalitie bombardeerde de afgelopen 3 maanden, 3 ziekenhuizen van Artsen zonder Grenzen…….’

Oh, nog vergeten: u gelooft toch niet, dat Koenders hier Saoedi-Arabië op aanspreekt, of aan zal spreken, zoals hij dat ‘ook niet’ deed bij eerdere oorlogsmisdaden en schendingen van mensenrechten door Saoedi-Arabië……..

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt.

Jemenitische rebellen en Iran slachtoffer van internationale leugens, aanvankelijk zelfs uit VN burelen……..

Mensen hier een vergeten concept, maar nog even actueel: de beschuldiging dat Iran de Houthi rebellen zou voorzien van wapens en munitie. Deze leugen is al eerder doorgeprikt maar gezien het feit dat men in de reguliere media deze leugen nog steeds propageert, kan het niet genoeg herhaald worden, vindt u ‘ook niet?’ Hier het artikel van Information Clearing House (u kunt onder dit artikel klikken voor een vertaling, dat kost wel wat tijd) :

How False Stories of Iran Arming the Houthis Were Used to Justify War in Yemen

By Gareth Porter
January 02, 2015 “Information Clearing House” – “Truth Out” – Peace talks between the Saudi-supported government of Yemen and the Houthi rebels ended in late December without any agreement to end the bombing campaign started by Saudi Arabia and its Gulf allies with US support last March. The rationale for the Saudi-led war on Houthis in Yemen has been that the Houthis are merely proxies of Iran, and the main alleged evidence for that conclusion is that Iran has been arming the Houthis for years.
The allegation of Iranian arms shipments to the Houthis – an allegation that has often been mentioned in press coverage of the conflict but never proven – was reinforced by a report released last June by a panel of experts created by the UN Security Council: The report concluded that Iran had been shipping arms to the Houthi rebels in Yemen by sea since at least 2009. But an investigation of the two main allegations of such arms shipments made by the Yemeni government and cited by the expert panel shows that they were both crudely constructed ruses.

Diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks reveal that the story of the arms onboard the ship had been concocted by the government.

The government of the Republic of Yemen, then dominated by President Ali Abdullah Saleh, claimed that it had seized a vessel named Mahan 1 in Yemeni territorial waters on October 25, 2009, with a crew of five Iranians, and that it had found weapons onboard the ship. The UN expert panel report repeated the official story that authorities had confiscated the weapons and that the First Instance Court of Sana’a had convicted the crew of the Mahan 1 of smuggling arms from Iran to Yemen.
But diplomatic cables from the US Embassy in Yemen released by WikiLeaks in 2010 reveal that, although the ship and crew were indeed Iranian, the story of the arms onboard the ship had been concocted by the government. On October 27, 2009, the US Embassy sent a cable to the State Department noting that the Embassy of Yemen in Washington had issued a press statement announcing the seizure of a “foreign vessel carrying a quantity of arms and other goods….” But another cable dated November 11, 2009, reported that the government had “failed to substantiate its extravagant public claims that an Iranian ship seized off its coast on October 25 was carrying military trainers, weapons and explosives destined for the Houthis.”
Furthermore, the cable continued, “sensitive reporting” – an obvious reference to US intelligence reports on the issue – “suggests that the ship was carrying no weapons at all.”
A follow-up Embassy cable five days later reported that the government had already begun to revise its story in light of the US knowledge that no arms had been found on board. “The ship was apparently empty when it was seized,” according to the cable. “However, echoing a claim by Yemen Ambassador al-Hajj, FM [Foreign Minister] Qaairbi told Pol Chief [chief of the US Embassy’s political section] on 11/15 the fact that the ship was empty indicated the arms had already been delivered.”

President Saleh had hoped to use the Mahan 1 ruse to get the political support of the US for a war to defeat the Houthis.

President Saleh had hoped to use the Mahan 1 ruse to get the political support of the US for a war to defeat the Houthis, which he was calling “Operation Scorched Earth.” But as a December 2009 cable noted, it was well known among Yemeni political observers that the Houthis were awash in modern arms and could obtain all they needed from the huge local arms market or directly from the Yemeni military itself.
Unlike the government’s story of the Mahan 1 and its phantom weapons, the official claim that a ship called the Jihan 1, seized on January 23, 2013, had arms onboard was true. But the totality of the evidence shows that the story of an Iranian arms shipment to the Houthis was false.
The ship was stopped in Yemeni waters by a joint patrol of the Yemeni Coast Guard and the US Navy, and an inspection found a cache of weapons and ammunition. The cargo including man-portable surface-to-air missiles, 122-millimeter rockets, rocket-propelled grenade launchers, C-4 plastic explosive blocks and equipment for improvised explosive devices.
Some weeks later, the UN expert panel inspected the weaponry said to have been found on board the Jihan 1 and found labels stuck on ammunition boxes with the legend “Ministry of Sepah” – the former name of the Iranian military logistics ministry. The panel report said the panel had determined that “all available information placed the Islamic Republic of Iran at the centre of the Jihan operation.”
But except for those labels, which could have been affixed to the boxes after the government had taken possession of the arms, nothing about the ship or the weapons actually pointed to Iran. All of the crew and the businessmen said to have arranged the shipment were Yemenis, according to the report. And the expert panel cited no evidence that the ship was Iranian or that the weapons were manufactured in Iran.

The expert panel cited no evidence that the ship was Iranian or that the weapons were manufactured in Iran.

The case rested on the testimony of the Yemeni crew members of the Jihan 1 – then still in government custody – who said they had sailed from Yemen to the Iranian port of Chabahar, had been taken to another Iranian port and then ferried by small boat to the Jihan 1 sitting off the Iranian coast. But although the panel said it had access to “waypoint data retrieved from Global Positioning System (GPS) devices,” it did not cite any such data that supported the crew members’ story. In fact, the panel acknowledged that it had “no information regarding the location at which the Jihan was loaded with arms….”
A crucial fact about the cargo, moreover, points not to Iran but to Yemen itself as the origin of the ship: The weapons on the ship were hidden under diesel fuel tanks and could be accessed only after those tanks had been emptied. The expert panel referred to that fact but failed to discuss its significance. But the June 2013report of a UN Security Council Monitoring Group on Somalia and Eritrea said that Jihan 1’s crew members had “divulged to a diplomatic source who interviewed them in Aden that the diesel was bound for Somalia.” An unnamed Yemeni official confirmed that fact, which the crew members had kept from the Security Council expert panel, according to the UN Monitoring Group report.
The fact that the Jihan 1 was headed for Somalia indicates that the ship was engaged in a commercial smuggling operation – not a politically motivated delivery. The lucrative business of smuggling diesel fuel from Yemen to Somalia had long been combined with arms smuggling to the same country across the Gulf of Aden from Yemen, as the Monitoring Group report made clear. The Monitoring Group report explained that the reason authorities in the Puntland region of Somalia had made it illegal to import petroleum products was that arms had so often been smuggled into ports on its coast hidden under diesel fuel.
The same UN Monitoring Group report also revealed that a series of arms shipments had been smuggled to Somalia in late 2012 – just before the Jihan 1 was seized – in which rocket-propelled grenade launchers were the primary component and IED components and electrical detonators were also prominent. Those were also major components of the Jihan 1 weapons shipment. The report said information received from the Puntland authorities and its own investigation had “established Yemen as a principal source of the these shipments.”
A key piece of evidence confirming that those arms had originated in Yemen was a communication from the Bulgarian government to the UN Monitoring Group indicating that all the rocket-propelled grenade rounds and propellant charges in one lot manufactured in Bulgaria and seized in Somalia had been delivered to the Yemeni armed forces in 2010.
The information in the Monitoring Group report thus points to Yemeni arms smugglers as the source of the cargo of weapons and diesel fuel aboard the Jihan 1. When the arms were seized by the joint US-Yemen patrol, the Yemeni government evidently decided to exploit it by creating a new story of an Iranian arms shipment to the Houthis, and later used the Yemeni crew to provide the details to the UN expert panel.
The Somalia and Eritrea Monitoring Group’s report created an obvious problem for the official story of the Jihan 1, and the Yemeni government’s anti-Iran, Western backers sought to give the story a new twist.Reuters quoted a “Western diplomat” as citing the Jihan 1 arms shipment as evidence that Iran had actually been involved in supplying arms to al-Shabaab terrorists in Somalia. The anonymous source noted that the cargo had included C-4 explosives such as were used by al-Shabaab for terrorist bombings, whereas the Houthis were not known to carry out such operations. But that claim was hardly credible, because al-Shabaab had close ties to al-Qaeda and was therefore an enemy of Iran. It has not been repeated except in pro-Saudi and pro-Israeli media outlets.
The Jihan 1 story and the broader narrative of intercepted Iranian arms shipments to the Houthis, as recycled by the UN Security Council expert panel, have nevertheless become key pieces of the widely accepted history of the regional conflicts involving Iran.
Gareth Porter (@GarethPorter) is an independent investigative journalist and historian writing on US national security policy. His latest book, Manufactured Crisis: The Untold Story of the Iran Nuclear Scare, was published in February 2014.

Click for Spanish, German, Dutch, Danish, French, translation- Note- Translation may take a moment to load.

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het voorgaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terugvindt. Dat geldt niet voor het label ‘Ali Abdullah Saleh’.

Hammelburg met een fantastische Iraanse kernbom op de proppenschieter! OEI!!!

Las gisteren een column van VS-, Israël- en wapenlobbyist Hammelburg op de BNR site. Dat is natuurlijk vragen om ‘problemen’, dat bleek al snel, een gigantische lachstuip, heeft me voor een half uur geveld……

De Column was genaamd: ‘Dood aan Amerika, dood aan Israël’. BNR oliebol Hammelburg fantaseert er lekker op los, trapt wat opendeuren in en komt tot de slotsom, dat Iran de boel belazert, met de besprekingen die nu plaats vinden tussen Iran, de VS en 5 andere landen. Rohani de president zou gezegd hebben, dat de overeenkomst ook zonder de VS gesloten kan worden, dus met:Rusland, Groot-Brittannië, China, Frankrijk en Duitsland. Dat Rohani dit zei, omdat het er zwaar op gaat lijken, dat Obama de handen waarschijnlijk niet op elkaar krijgt voor een handtekening onder een verdrag (waarbij de sancties tegen Iran opgeheven zullen worden), is iets dat Hammelburg er natuurlijk niet bij vertelt……. Al stelt hij wel, dat de pleuris uit zou breken in de VS, als Obama tekent. Dat zou Obama, volgens Hammelburg, willen doen, zonder enige verdere voorwaarden te stellen en garanties te eisen aan en van Iran……. Uiteraard gelul, anders hadden deze besprekingen niet zoveel tijd gekost…..

Hammelburg dacht beet te hebben, toen hij stelde, dat Rohani daar geen enkel gebaar van goede wil wenst te maken……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Dus de halve wereld bemoeit zich met jouw Iraanse binnenlandse aangelegenheden, je stelt dat je je aan de voorwaarden van die landen schikt….. Maar dat is volgens de ‘uiterst deskundige’ Hammelburg ‘geen enkel gebaar van goede wil……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! Jezus wat een enorme droplul!!!

Volgens Hammelburg heeft Israël gelijk met de angst die men daar heeft, dat Iran een kernbom zal maken. ook al zijn de meningen daarover verdeeld……” ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Let op! Hier heeft onze volvette oliebol het nog over ‘men‘, maar dan vervolgt hij met te zeggen, dat het bewijs, dat Israël gelijk heeft, de ‘voortdurende demonstraties’ zijn die in Iran plaatsvinden (opgezet door een fanatieke minderheid). Waarom? Omdat er in die ‘demonstraties’ wordt geroepen: “Dood aan Amerika, dood aan Israël…….” Tja en aangezien Iran de VS en Israël in het verleden al tientallen malen heeft aangevallen, kan je niet anders concluderen, dat Israël gelijk heeft…. Of snap ik ‘t niet helemaal???? Eén ding is zeker: als er nu een paar landen zijn, van wie staten in het Midden-Oosten iets te vrezen hebben, gebaseerd op tientallen feiten, zijn het de VS en Israël wel!!! Laat ik alleen de illegale oorlog van de VS tegen Irak noemen, meer dan 1 miljoen doden en een land dat in chaos is gestort, een oorlog die het ontstaan van IS (=ISIS) heeft bewerkstelligd!!!

Verder vraag ik me af, wat die ‘voortdurende demonstraties’ betekenen, zijn er dagelijks demonstraties van dat karakter, of is dat een paar keer per maand, of gebeurt dit nadat Israël bijvoorbeeld het zoveelste bloedbad onder de Palestijnen heeft aangericht???

Voor meer ‘deskundig advies’ van Hammelburg, klik op het label met zijn naam, onder dit bericht.

Wim Berkelaar, de ‘intellectuele geschiedeniskampioen’, wil verdachte jihadisten wel 25 jaar opsluiten……..

De islamofobie droop zaterdagmiddag weer eens uit de speakers van m’n radio, toen ik in de herhaling naar Oba Live, van de Humanistische omroep, zat te luisteren. Te gast was de huis, tuin en keuken ‘geschiedkundige’, xenofoob en islamofoob Berkelaar, de hufter die nooit te beroerd is om uiterst lullig commentaar te geven op gebeurtenissen in het alledaagse, zeg maar de geschiedenis van de toekomst………

Berkelaar kwam om te spreken over islamofoob en communistenhater Falacci, de schrijfster/journalist, die in 2006 overleed. Veel mooie woorden en anekdotes over deze toch niet ‘geheel frisse dame’. Met name de verhalen over Falacci in Iran (om Khomeini te interviewen) en een paar interviews van deze journalist met o.a. Sharon en Golda Meïr, ‘deden het goed’. Alsof Holman, de presentator, zijn sidekick (die moet oppassen niet teveel te zeggen) Max Pam en Berkelaar zo ongeveer een driedubbel orgasme in drievoud bereikten, of beter ‘driefout’, zo reageerden de heren op de geweldige samenspraak en op uitlatingen als: “Sharon was echt een man..!!” van Berkelaar. Toen deze de naam Golda Meïr noemde, was het hek van de dam, alsof men thuiskwam van een reis naar Mars, immers alles wat Israël doet, is gerechtvaardigd!! Alle jezus wat een kortzichtige ouwehoeren!!

Berkelaar denkt ook dat hij filosoof is, daarom gooide hij in de groep, dat (politiek) ‘links’ onaanraakbaar is en ‘rechts’ juist heel aanraakbaar, met andere woorden, daar zitten toch echt de mensen die er toe doen, met emoties, zoals Falacci en Theo van Gogh en aaaaah daar ging het weer los: een nieuw driedubbel orgasme!! Nee links is gevoelloos keihard tuig, dat niet wenst te overleggen……. Moet u nagaan, volgens deze namaak intellectuelen is de PvdA links….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Terwijl de PvdA zich perfect heeft aangepast aan het neoliberalisme van de VVD……

Daarover gesproken: volgens de heren is links verantwoordelijk voor alle problemen met Marokkanen en andere islamitisch georiënteerde minderheden in dit land. Links heeft hen altijd geknuffeld (dus toch emoties???) en daar hebben zoveel ‘goede’ mensen tegen gewaarschuwd, zoals Falacci en anderen, aldus het stel. Natuurlijk werd er niet bijverteld, wie de eerste generatie van die minderheden hier heen heeft gehaald: de ondernemers in de achterban van de VVD en en het huidige CDA (de oorspronkelijke partijen uit die partij waren bijvoorbeeld oververtegenwoordigd bij de tuinders in het Westland). Die tuinders namen de boete ‘voor lief’, de boete die ze kregen, als ze arbeiders (veelal Marokkanen), zonder geldige papieren voor Nederland, in dienst hadden, kosten 4.000 gulden per overtreding (daar konden dan meerdere arbeiders bij betrokken zijn, het bedrag bleef fl 4.000,–). De tuinders betaalden en daar hun arbeiders over de grens werden gezet, haalden ze de volgende dag ‘nieuwe Marokkanen’ in Antwerpen, een caravan achter in de tuin, klaar is kees!!! En die boete? Die was zo terugverdiend!!

Het gesprek kwam op bekende figuren, die vanwege moslim geweld zouden zijn ‘gevlucht’ naar de VS (ha! ha! ha!), zoals Hirsi Ali en Salman Rushdie….. Hirsi Ali kreeg een dikke baan aangeboden in een gore rechtse ‘denktank’, tegen een godsvermogen aan salaris, nee echt een hééél gemotiveerde vlucht…. ha! ha! ha! ‘Goed’, waarom die mensen naar de VS vluchten? Dat wist Pam wel: als je daar gepakt wordt voor ‘jihadisme’, ook al ben je niet naar Syrië geweest, krijg je zomaar 25 jaar gevangenisstraf opgelegd….. Tijdens het spreken van Pam, hoorde je Berkelaar al klaarkomen met de woorden: “Hele goeie maatregel, overtuigend…….!” Dus die zware boetes voorkomen aanslagen in de VS…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Nee, dat hebben we gezien de laatste jaren!! Let wel mensen, dit is een programma van de Humanistische Omroep, ‘Human……’ Ongelofelijk deze verachtelijke, inhumane islamofoben! Het zal je kind maar zijn, dat zich verdwaast overlevert aan ronselende psychopaten en alleen al door het plan om naar Syrië te gaan, voor 25 jaar achter de tralies verdwijnt….

Nog buiten het voorgaande: deze hufters, Berkelaar, Holman en Pam, staan dus ook achter zware straffen, omdat die zouden helpen, om over de doodstraf maar te zwijgen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Wat een stelletje gekken, ze kunnen beter verdwijnen naar het land van Eergisteren, jezus op een manke ezel!!!

Na dit onderdeel, kwam het wekelijks weerkerend onderdeel ‘Ketter en Geest’ van Pam, waarin hij godsdienstige waanzin berichten brengt. Berkelaar mocht blijven zitten. Het eerste bericht dat Pam noemde ging geloof ik over Pasen en chocolade. Holman en Pam moesten hier beiden flink om lachen, alleen Berkelaar bleef doodstil….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, de door Holman en Pam zwaar opgehemelde Berkelaar, is christelijk!!!! Tja, het is natuurlijk wel teveel gevraagd om even na te zoeken, waar je gast voor staat……. Uiteraard is elke religie (terecht) belachelijk te maken, precies als elke politieke richting, behalve het neoliberalisme, dat door de ‘heren’ Holman en Pam steevast ‘liberalisme’ wordt genoemd, daar ze vinden dat wij amper of geen neoliberalen hebben in dit land……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Gierveld (ambassadeur Jemen) doet er nog een schep bovenop… Op de anti-Houthi propaganda!!

De ambassadeur van Jemen heeft definitief de weg naar de studio’s gevonden en ‘opengebroken’, gisteren hoorde ik hem deze week al voor de tweede keer op de radio. Dit keer bij BNR’s volvette oliebol Hammelburg, waarvan ik, eerlijk is eerlijk, moet zeggen, dat hij zinniger vragen stelde dan eerder deze week op Radio1*, zowaar vroeg Hammelburg hoe het is gesteld met de terreur van IS en Al Qaida in Jemen. Gierveld raakte duidelijk even van slag, hij is gewend, om zonder teveel strubbelingen, de Houthi-milities af te kunnen branden. Nu moest hij wel toegeven, dat de terreur van deze twee groepen niet misselijk is en uiteraard moest hij nu wel de bloederige aanslagen op een aantal sjiitische moskeeën in Jemen noemen, die onlangs plaatsvonden. Een gebeurtenis waardoor de Houthi-milities de wapens pas echt goed oppakten, daar er te weinig werd opgetreden, tegen dit tuig, door de pro-Saoedische president Abd Rabbuh Mansur Al-Hadi, Saoedi-Arabië het land dat groepen als IS (= ISIS) en Al Qaida steunt…… Die president is een goede vriend van Gierveld, dat kan je wel opmaken uit zijn woorden……

Dit alles was geen reden voor Gierveld zijn woorden te temperen, integendeel, de lul hield Hammelburg en de luisteraar nog eens voor, dat de Houthi-milities terreurdaden begaan. Al durft hij dat niet hardop te zeggen, z’n woorden spreken boekdelen, dus is ‘t volgens deze mislukte koekenbakker van het grootste belang dat de Houthi-milities bestreden moeten worden. Nog even werd Iran genoemd en het grote gevaar, dat dit land teveel te zeggen krijgt in de regio, terwijl ze nu alleen maar humanitaire hulp naar Jemen sturen, waar men in het westen op zijn/haar stinkreet blijft zitten…… Waar we wel goed in zijn als ‘westen’ in het Midden-Oosten is de boel destabiliseren, zoals keer op keer blijkt!!!

Ongelofelijk hè, wij steunen zogenaamd de strijd tegen IS, maar een groep die tegen IS optreedt, vanwege het geweld dat deze groep in hun land aanricht, wordt door het westen als ‘zware’ terreurgroep aangewezen……… Maar niet alleen dat: ook de strijd van Saoedi-Arabië, Egypte en Marokko tegen de Houthi-milities, wordt gesteund door het westen………. Vergeet daarbij niet, dat IS ‘stiekem’ wordt gesteund door Saoedi-Arabië, de inhumane dictatuur waar Nederland goede handelsbetrekkingen mee onderhoudt…..

* Zie: ‘Ambassadeur Jemen steunt Saoedi-Arabië en daarmee Al Qaida en IS……..

en: ‘Hans van Beek, ambassadeur Libië: het is een groot land met poreuze grenzen, vandaar!

Robert van Voren vergeleek Putin met Hitler en stelt dat in Rusland een angstpsychose wordt gevoed

Afgelopen zaterdag in de Kots Nieuwsshow, hoogleraar Sovjetstudies in Litouwen en Georgië, van Voren. Deze hoogleraar sprak op driftige ADHD toon de presentatoren en het volk toe, over de agressie van Putin. Rusland heeft met Putin een misdadig regime, aldus van Voren, die bovendien Putin met Hitler vergeleek, niet op een serieuze manier, maar je kan maar beter stellen waar het om gaat, als je onwetenden toespreekt, nietwaar?! Niets over de NAVO, die, tegen de afspraken met Rusland in, steeds verder naar de grenzen van Rusland toe kruipt, voor zover, de NAVO daar al niet aanwezig is, inclusief raketten rond Rusland, die zogenaamd tegen Iran staan opgesteld. Met andere woorden, wie is de werkelijke agressor in deze? Zie de gemaakte afspraken met 3 EU ministers, Oekraïense vertegenwoordigers en Rusland, over Oekraïne, die afspraken werden vrijwel onmiddellijk na het afsluiten gefrustreerd door Oekraïne, zonder een kik van de EU………

Volgens van Voren is er een grote angstpsychose ontstaan in Rusland, van Voren noemde als voorbeeld het aantal fascisten in Oekraïne, dat in Rusland zwaar wordt overdreven, hun aantal in Oekraïne is even groot, als in ons land, aldus van Voren…….. Al zou dat zo zijn, dan hebben die fascisten in Oekraïne, in tegenstelling tot ‘onze’ fascisten, flink wat macht, zo hebben ze de directeur van een groot tv station, in zijn eigen kantoor aangevallen, onder toeziend oog, van een fascistische parlementariër, om nog maar te zwijgen over het grote aandeel in het geweld, dat deze fascisten tijdens de opstand gebruikten………… Bovendien zijn die ‘weinige’ fascisten dan wel erg prominent aanwezig, niet alleen in het parlement (als ‘ordebewakers’), maar ook op straat, of rekent van Voren 10 fascisten, voor 1 gewone burger? Nee, die Russen lijden aan een angstpsychose, die gevoed wordt met leugens, zoals die over de fascisten in Oekraïne. Aan zijn ‘fascisten bagatellisering’ voegde van Voren toe, dat de huidige (niet gekozen) premier n.b. van Joodse komaf is………. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Dus Joden kunnen geen fascisten zijn, jezus waar haalt hij die wijsheid vandaan, het is maar goed, dat deze flapdrol geen les geeft in Nederland!!! We hebben al teveel idioten, die studenten onderwijs mogen geven, neem de CDA militair-industrieel complex lobbyist en nitwit de luxe de Hoop Scheffer

Van Voren spreekt over Russische propaganda, maar vindt het blijkbaar normaal, dat de VS de laatste jaren, met 4 miljard dollar, de opstand tegen Janoekovytsj, op poten heeft gezet. Met dat geld en de nieuwe stroom geld uit de VS, werd en wordt flink wat anti-Russische propaganda gevoerd in Oekraïne………

Over propaganda gesproken, daar weet van Voren wel raad mee!!!