Hillary Clinton volgens FBI vrij van misdaad….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Wat een grap hè mensen? Dat gedoe met de FBI en Clinton. Clinton speelde de vermoorde onschuld en durfde een overheidsorgaan te beschuldigen van verkiezingsmanipulatie……… Vooral op dat laatste legde ze heel veel nadruk, het kon niet toevallig zijn, zo kort voor de verkiezingen, dat de directeur van de FBI eindelijk met een onderzoek kwam…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Er is al bijna twee jaar ellende wat betreft Clinton, illegale oorlogen (zoals die tegen Libië en Syrië) en ronduit zwaar misdadige handelingen, zoals terreurgroepen steunen en zelfs te gebruiken om ellende te zaaien, zoals in Syrië en Libië …….*

Dat zijn nog maar een paar voorbeelden, ook de opstand in Libië werd betaald en geregisseerd door de VS en dan m.n. door Clinton, o.a. in samenwerking met de Moslim Broederschap*. Ook de opstand en coup in Oekraïne komen uit de sigarenkoker van Hillary Clinton….. Die laatste ‘grap’ die intussen is uitgemond in een oorlog, gevoerd door de VS (onder Clinton) geparachuteerde junta Porosjenko tegen het eigen volk in Oost-Oekraïne, heeft de VS met maar liefst 4 miljard dollar ‘gekocht….’

Honduras werd door Clinton in 2009 aan een staatsgreep tegen de democratisch gekozen regering geholpen, waarna een VS vazal de macht overnam….. Mensen zoals gezegd, dit zijn nog maar een paar zaken uit het met bloed doordrenkte dagboek van Clinton, er zijn veel meer zaken, waarin Clinton als enorme misdadiger naar voren komt………

Ondanks stapels  bewijzen met het tegendeel, beweerde FBI chef James Comey afgelopen zondag, dat Clinton zich nergens schuldig aan heeft gemaakt…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Het is duidelijk: Clinton zal en moet winnen, de beurzen gisteren maakten na de mededeling van Comey afgelopen zondag, een sprong omhoog………. Trump is een enorme klootzak en fascist, maar hij heeft nog steeds gelijk, als hij stelt dat de verkiezingen in de VS gestoken zijn…… Hij vergeet erbij te vertellen, dat de verkiezingen in de VS altijd oneerlijk verlopen en alsof Trump zelf niet politici en ambtenaren naar zijn hand heeft gezet ‘met één of ander……’

* Het volgende komt van het blog van Stan van Houcke (7 november 2016):

Hillary
Clinton Knew She Was Helping Terrorists

Hillary
Clinton Knew She Was Helping Islamists Move Into Power In Libya

Hillary Clinton received intelligence that her effort to bring down Libyan president Muammar Gaddafi was leading to the rise of al-Qaeda militants and the Muslim Brotherhood in the country, according to emails released by WikiLeaks.


More than a year before the Benghazi attack, Clinton learned that al-Qaeda terrorists were infiltrating the post-Gadaffi transitional government. Clinton also acknowledged that the Muslim Brotherhood wielded the “real power” in the rebel movement that Clinton was supporting — and that their Brotherhood allies in Egypt were waiting in the wings to move into Libya’s oil sector.


Clinton received a “CONFIDENTIAL” memo from Sidney Blumenthal on March 27, 2011. The subject of the email was “Re: Lots of new intel; Libyan army possibly on verge of collapse.”


Blumenthal explained that “radical/terrorist” groups were “infiltrating the NLC,” or National Libyan Council, a rebel quasi-government that earned French recognition as Libya’s governing body that very same month. Clinton was warned that al-Qaeda could become major players in the region.


Blumenthal wrote:

This situation has become increasingly frustrating for French President Nicolas Sarkozy, who, according to knowledgeable individuals, is pressing to have France emerge from this crisis as the principal foreign ally of any new government that takes power. Sarkozy is also concerned about continuing reports that radical/terrorist groups such as the Libyan Fighting Groups and Al Qa’ida in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) are infiltrating the NLC and its military command. Accordingly, he asked sociologist who has long established ties to Israel, Syria, and other B6 nations in the Middle East, to use his contacts to determine the level of influence AQIM and other. terrorist groups have inside of the NLC. Sarkozy also asked for reports setting out a clear picture of the role of the Muslim Brotherhood in the rebel leadership…

(Source Comment: Senior European security officials caution that AQIM is watching developments in Libya, and elements of that organization have been in touch with tribes in the southeastern part of the country. These officials are concerned that in a post-Qaddafi Libya, France and other western European countries must move quickly to ensure that the new government does not allow AQIM and others to set up small, semi- autonomous local entities—or “Caliphates”—in the oil and gas producing regions of southeastern Libya.)”

On May 30, 2011, Hillary aide Jake Sullivan sent the secretary of state a full list of known “Libya emissaries.” By then, the National Libyan Council had given way to the Transitional National Council (TNC), but the “real power” still lay with the Muslim Brotherhood.


Sullivan’s intelligence memo noted:

The Qadhafi regime has also met with the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood leadership in Egypt. According to Qadhafi chief of staff Fouad Zlitni, the Muslim Brotherhood asserts that TNC may be the political leadership of the opposition, but the real power lies with the Libyan Brotherhood and they are apparently willing to bide their time. The Qadhafi regime also offered to send senior tribal leaders to Benghazi to negotiate with the TNC, but the TNC rejected the proposal.”

Clinton forwarded that email to an aide, acknowledging that she had received it and assessed its contents.

Sidney Blumenthal wrote to Clinton again on July 3, 2012, two months before Benghazi, to talk about the upcoming election. The election, Blumenthal noted, was how the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt was hoping to use the new Brotherhood party in Libya to get into the Libyan oil game.


Blumenthal wrote:

Source Comment: In the opinion of a knowledgeable individual, the division of the 200 seats in the GNC lies at the heart of this matter, with 120 seats allotted for the Tripolitania, 60 for Barqa, and 18 for the Fezzan area. At present, the Libyan Muslim Brotherhood (LMB) and its political arm, the Justice and Construction Party (JCP), are attempting to mount a national campaign, receiving discreet advice and technical support from the Egyptian Muslim Brotherhood (EMB). With this assistance, Jalil is convinced that the JCP is the party that operates most effectively throughout the country. Jalil has established ties to the EMB, from whom he has learned that JCP leader Mohamad Sowan and his associates are working with the leadership of the EMB.) 4.According to his sources, Jalil believes that he can work with Sowan and the LMB/JCP; however, he is concerned that Mohammed Morsi, the newly elected EMB President of Egypt, and EMB Supreme Guide Mohammed Badie are focused on developing Egyptian influence in Libya. Jalil has been informed privately that these EMB leaders want to establish a strong position in Libya, particularly in the oil services sector as part of their effort to improve Egypt’s economic situation.

Over in Egypt, Clinton helped spur the uprising that led to the Muslim Brotherhood briefly taking power in that country around the same time. And a young Clinton Foundation employee, Gehad El-Haddad, was already working in Cairo to help the Muslim Brotherhood gain power.


El-Haddad was arrested in 2013, following the brief and disastrous reign of Muslim Brotherhood leader Mohammed Morsi, for inciting violence. He was reportedly one of Morsi’s top advisers. El-Haddad was sentenced to life in prison in 2015.

Tags: al-QaidaHillary
Clinton
LibyaMuslim
Brotherhood
Sidney
Blumenthal

===========


Wat een ‘geweldige vrouw’ hè, die Clinton, zeg maar gewelddadige vrouw…….. ‘Echt om als vouw trots op te zijn’, als zij wordt gekozen tot president…… 

Zie ook: ‘Hondurese activiste ontvoerd en vermoord (alweer…), met instemming van de VS………

       en: ‘Berta Cáceres voorvechter gelijke rechten en milieuactivist vermoord in Honduras

       en: ‘Hillary Clinton mede verantwoordelijk voor moord op Berta Cáceres………..

       en: ‘VS presidentsverkiezingen, voor wie zou u kiezen?

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

VN ethisch en moreel totaal failliet…….. Saoedi-Arabië alweer verkozen tot voorzitter UNHRC….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Alweer even geleden, op 28 oktober jl. het bericht, dat de reli-fascistische, psychopathische dictatuur Saoedi-Arabië voor de tweede keer tot voorzitter van de VN Mensenrechtenorganisatie (of -commissie, wat u wilt >> UNHRC) is verkozen……

Schoftendictatuur Saoedi-Arabië, schendt niet alleen de mensenrechten op grote en grove schaal in het eigen land, maar begaat daarnaast vreselijke oorlogsmisdaden in Jemen, Syrië en Irak en dat niet alleen vanwege hun financiële en militaire steun voor terreurgroepen als IS en Al Qaida. Saoedi-Arabië gaat als een beest tekeer in Jemen, steden worden platgegooid, uiterst belangrijke (nuts-) voorzieningen als ziekenhuizen, scholen, waterzuivering en elektriciteitscentrales werden middels bombardementen vernield.

Naast een enorm aantal burgerslachtoffers door die bombardementen, sterven ouderen, kinderen en lichamelijk zwakke mensen intussen van de honger, veroorzaakt door de blokkades opgeworpen door de Saoedische coalitie……* Voorts is er door die blokkades, een groot tekort aan medische middelen (zoals medicijnen), water en brandstof…….. 



A man walks on the rubble of a municipal board building after it was destroyed by Saudi-led air strikes in the northwestern city of Saada, Yemen, October 2, 2016 © Naif Rahma



Dit is overigens de tweede keer dat S.A. deze positie als voorzitter van de UNHRC krijgt toegewezen, van alle ophef die dit de laatste keer opleverde, heeft men geen lering getrokken, sterker nog: men heeft er schijt aan!! Daarnaast is het een grof schandaal dat de belangrijke westerse landen als de VS en de EU niet toentertijd al zich hebben teruggetrokken uit deze waardeloze VN commissie……

Nogmaals en geheel ten overvloede bewijst dit dat het westen (inclusief Rutte 2 en een groot aantal politici uit de ‘oppositie’) pal achter de psychopathische moordenaars van de Saoedische dictatuur staan………

De VN is niet alleen een tandeloze organisatie, maar nu zelfs een organisatie die vrouwenongelijkheid, reli-fascistische terreur, mensenrechtenschendingen als martelingen, openbare executies middels onthoofdingen en ernstige oorlogsmisdaden, niet als belemmering ziet voor het toekennen van het voorzitterschap van de UNHRC (godbetert de VN mensenrechtenorganisatie)…… Ofwel de VN geeft het voorzitterschap van de UNHRC aan één van ‘s werelds grootste mensenrechtenschenders……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Mensen, de wereld staat op z’n kop, wat hebben we nog aan de VN, die zich bovendien keer op keer op valse gronden druk maakt over zaken die een uur in de wind stinken, neem Aleppo…….

Tot slot, zoals al vaker gesteld op deze plek: ‘geweldig de enorme aandacht, die de reguliere westerse media hebben voor Jemen en de smerige rol van Saoedi-Arabië’, zeker in vergelijking met ‘de minimale aandacht voor Aleppo en hypocriete aandacht voor Mosul……’



* Deze coalitie wordt intussen ook direct door de VS gesteund, dat kruisraketten afschiet op Jemenitische steden…… De VS, u weet wel, onder het presidentschap van de Nobelprijs voor de vrede winnaar Obama……….

Zie ook: ‘Danny Danon, VN ambassadeur Israël, nieuwe voorzitter Algemene Vergadering van de VN……….. Weer een psychopaat voor zaken van vrede, veiligheid en mensenrechten……..

        en: ‘Its Official: Our World is Governed by Psychopaths

        en: ‘Ruslandfobie: anti-Russische propaganda, waarvoor Goebbels zich niet zou hebben geschaamd!

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Foto’s van blog Stan van Houcke en RT, bron o.a. RT.

Jemen en Saoedi-Arabië: leugens van de ‘onafhankelijke’ NOS voor ‘het goede doel……….’

Gistermorgen in het Radio1 nieuws van 9.00 u. het bericht, dat de terreur-coalitie van Saoedi-Arabië een gevangenis in Sanaa (Jemen) had gebombardeerd, u begrijpt: een fiks aantal bewakers en gevangenen omgekomen, plus wat ontsnappingen.

De nieuwslezer stelde dat de de Houthi rebellen het leger van president Hadi sinds 2012 bestrijden en dat Saoedi-Arabië deze president en zijn leger helpen in het gevecht tegen de Houthi rebellen…..

Hier de feiten: de corrupte schoft Hadi trad NB zelf af in 2012, nadat hij en zijn leger het onderspit delfden in de strijd van de Houthi’s tegen zijn meer dan waardeloze regering. Hadi gaf IS en Al Qaida onderdak in Jemen, aangezien deze moordenaars de soennitische tak van de islam aanhangen, begonnen deze psychopaten met waanzinnige terreur tegen het sjiitische deel van de bevolking, waartoe ook de Houthi’s behoren. Zo werden scholen, gezondheidscentra en moskeeën van de sjiieten belaagd……..

Pas nadat Saoedi-Arabië, dat elke sjiiet aanmerkt als een Iraanse agent, Hadi onder druk zette, benoemde deze zich weer tot rechtmatige president van Jemen en daarmee kon hij de hulp van Saoedi-Arabië inroepen voor de strijd tegen de Houthi’s……. Het ‘leger’ van Hadi wordt niet alleen vanuit de lucht gesteund door Saoedi-Arabië, maar ook op de grond door Saoedische militairen en ongeregeld terroristisch tuig uit de Golfstaten…….

Deze terreurtroepen zijn o.a. verantwoordelijk voor de blokkades in Jemen, blokkades die er voor hebben gezorgd, dat er nu kinderen omkomen van de honger in Jemen….. Daarnaast is er door die blokkades, een groot gebrek aan medicijnen, water en brandstof…… De havens van Jemen die in handen van de Houthi’s zijn, worden regelmatig gebombardeerd, intussen ook door de VS………

De Houthi’s worden sinds een aantal maanden gesteund door de voormalige president Saleh en troepen die hem trouw zijn.

‘Uiteraard’ wordt deze informatie niet vermeld in het ‘onafhankelijke’ NOS nieuws…….. Logisch, Nederland is immers goed bevriend met het psychopathische, reli-fascistische Saoedische bewind…… Kijk als het Assad was die zo laf een gevangenis bombardeerde, was dit een heel ander verhaal…… Oh nee, dom van mij, dat hoeft het reguliere Syrische leger helemaal niet te doen, dat verzinnen ‘we’ (de reguliere westerse media en politiek) ‘gewoon’ en anders wordt dit bericht wel gefabriceerd door de psychopathische moordenaars, die zich White Helmets noemen, of het Syrian Observatory for Human Rights (SOHR), dat uit 1 persoon bestaat, een veroordeelde misdadiger die NB vanuit Engeland werkt……..

Trouwens toch al erg opvallend, die ongelijke aandacht van de reguliere media voor Aleppo, terwijl er in Jemen kinderen van de honger sterven, alles door handelen van de Saoedische coalitie, die gesteund wordt door het westen en dan m.n. door de grootste terreurentiteit op aarde de VS en haar waakhond Groot-Brittannië, het land dat zelfs clustermunitie levert aan S.A……..

Zie ook: ‘Jemen: het westen ‘is blind’ voor de terreur die Saoedi-Arabië met steun van de VS en GB uitoefent in dat land…..

        en: ‘Ploumen acht het mogelijk dat Nederlandse wapensystemen worden gebruikt door S.A. in Jemen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: ‘Saoedi-Arabië bombardeert begrafenis ceremonie in Jemen, VS ‘heroverweegt’ wapenleveranties………

        en: ‘Witte Huis juristen waarschuwden Obama al in 2015 voor aanklachten wegens oorlogsmisdaden

        en: (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling in ‘Dutch’): ‘U.S. and U.K. Continue to Participate in War Crimes, Targeting of Yemeni Civilians

       en:
Alan
Johnston (BBC): de cholera uitbraak in Jemen is te danken aan de
burgeroorlog…… AUW!!
     

        en: ‘Nederland financiert terrorisme in Syrië……..‘ (met o.a. een analyse van de White Helmets)

        en: ‘Rusland en Syrië worden o.a. door Frankrijk beschuldigt van terreur in Aleppo……… De vraag is wie de ware terroristen zijn

       en: ‘Nep-nieuws de norm bij NOS en Volkskrant

       en: ‘Aleppo: Sander van Hoorn met ongezouten anti-Russische propaganda, gebaseerd op ‘van horen en zeggen…….’

       en: ‘Aleppo, de BBC krijgt de deksel op de propaganda neus!!

        en: ‘Gulf of Tonkin 2.0? US Using Unconfirmed Attack on Navy Ship to Quietly Start War With Iran & Russia

        en: ‘VS heeft reden gefabriceerd om de Houthi rebellen in Jemen te bombarderen…….‘    

Wat betreft gekleurde westerse berichtgeving zie ook:

               ‘Aleppo: ondanks duidelijk gemanipuleerde video met meisje van 8, loopt de reguliere pers ermee weg…….

        en: ‘Generaal b.d. van Loon: Defensie budget moet veel hoger en we moeten Syrië in…….

        en: ‘BBC World Service met onversneden anti-Russische propaganda i.z. Syrië……..

        en: ‘‘BBC Propaganda’ ‘Ken Loach just proved beyond doubt that the BBC is brainwashing the British public’‘ [VIDEO] 

        en: ‘Russian, Syrian Jets Did Not Conduct Airstrikes on UN Convoy in Aleppo – MoD

        en: ‘Will Russia Surrender?‘ (blog Stan van Houcke)

       en: ‘VS coalitie bombardeert ‘per ongeluk’ het Syrische leger…..‘ en: ‘62 Syrian Troops Killed in US-led Attack

        en:  ‘Hulpkonvooi aangevallen ‘door Syrisch leger…..’ Of toch niet??

        en: ‘Samantha Power Blames Everything on Russia – Defends US Attack On Syrian Troops

       en: ‘John Kerry: ‘de VS kan niet alleen de deur naar de vrede openhouden….’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

        en: The US Road Map To Balkanize Syria

     en: ‘Anonieme VS regeringsvertegenwoordiger zou Syrië en Rusland hebben gedreigd met raketten voor de ‘gematigde’ terreurgroepen……….

      en: ‘Jemen ‘kerstweek bombardementen’: meer dan 100 vermoorde burgers, de daders >> de Saoedische coalitie o.l.v. de VS……

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Mijn excuus voor de belabberde weergave, van alles geprobeerd, krijg het niet goed.

ISIS wapens uit Oostenrijk………

Oostenrijk, u weet wel: het land ‘dat vluchtelingen uit Syrië en Irak met open armen ontvangt’, levert wapens van Steyr Mannlicher aan de barbaarse terroristen van IS…..

Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten (DWN) bracht gisteren het nieuws, dat Egypte wapens van Steyr Mannlicher uit Oostenrijk heeft onderschept…….

De Oostenrijkse regering stelt ten eerste dat de laatste jaren geen vergunningen werden afgegeven voor Egypte. Ten tweede: mocht dit toch het geval zijn, zie punt één……..

Ongelofelijk, reken maar dat de wapenfabrikanten uit Hongarije, Tsjechië  en Polen, ook dik geld verdienen aan terreurgroepen als IS…… Terwijl dit (intussen fascistoïde) geteisem in Oost-Europa weigert vluchtelingen op te nemen, die op de vlucht zijn geslagen voor de door het westen, maar m.n. door de VS, geregisseerde illegale oorlogen……. Illegale oorlogen veelal gevoerd met wapens uit voornoemde landen en zoals nu blijkt zelfs uit Oostenrijk…….

Overigens leveren de VS en Turkije ook wapens aan IS, dat schijnt wat betreft Turkije nog steeds te gebeuren (het zou me niet verbazen, als hetzelfde voor de VS opgaat…)……. Waarbij nog aangetekend moet worden, dat Saoedi-Arabië ook wapens (en geld) levert aan IS en andere ‘gematigde’ soennitische terreurgroepen…… De VS, Groot-Brittannië en Frankrijk leveren op hun beurt wapens en munitie aan de reli-fascistische dictatuur in S.A. Wapens en munitie waarmee S.A. ook in Jemen een groot aantal oorlogsmisdaden beging en begaat………. GB levert zelfs clusterbommen aan S.A………

NB: de VS schijnt naast bombardementen op doelen in Jemen en standrechtelijke executies van verdachten middels drones, nu ook speciale troepen op de grond te hebben in dat land…… Jemen, waar mensen nu zelfs de hongerdood sterven door de machinaties van Saoedi-Arabië en dat in een in feite illegale oorlog!

Hier de link naar het volledige artikel op DWN.

Zie ook: ‘De VS en gelieerden begaan enorme oorlogsmisdaden, maar wijzen Rusland en Syrië als de daders aan!

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dat geldt niet voor het label ‘Steyr Mannlicher’.

VS heeft reden gefabriceerd om de Houthi rebellen in Jemen te bombarderen…….

In Jemen komen mensen (kinderen, zwakken en ouden van dagen) om van de honger, dit vanwege de extreme terreur die Saoedi-Arabië (S.A.) uitoefent op de Jemenitische bevolking….. Ziekenhuizen, scholen, elektriciteitsvoorziening en watervoorziening zijn gebombardeerd door de coalitie van S.A. Daarnaast heeft S.A. diverse blokkades opgeworpen, zodat er geen hulpgoederen, zoals water, medicatie, voeding en brandstof aangevoerd kunnen worden in Jemen……

De Houthi rebellen, worden gesteund door de eerdere president Saleh van Jemen en een deel van het leger, zij bestrijden niet alleen de Saoedische coalitie, maar ook Al Qaida en IS. Deze terreurgroepen kregen vrije toegang tot Jemen, door de laatste (vrijwillig) opgestapte president, Al-Hadi….. Dezelfde president, die geen moeite had, met de terreuraanvallen, door voornoemde terreurgroepen, op de hoofdzakelijk sjiitische bevolking……

Alsof dit alles nog niet genoeg is, heeft de VS, intussen een reden verzonnen om de Houthi rebellen te bombarderen….. Dezelfde VS die S.A. voorziet van wapens, wapentuig en militair advies; er schijnen zelfs VS militairen in Jemen aanwezig te zijn…….

Eerder vorige week kwam de VS marine met de klacht, dat Houthi rebellen een VS kruiser in de Golf van Aden zouden hebben beschoten met raketten……* Gisternacht, in het BBC nieuws van 1.30 u. het bericht, dat de Houthi’s alweer een raket op een VS marineschip zouden hebben afgeschoten……. Een dikke vette leugen, de VS kan geen beelden tonen van die raketten (de VS sprak eerder van ‘kruisraketten’) en kan zoals te verwachten na het voorgaande, geen schade aan de schepen tonen…….

Waarom zouden de Houthi’s, als zij beschikken over raketten, deze niet tegen de straaljagers en bommenwerpers van Saoedi-Arabië gebruiken???

Saoedi-Arabië kwam afgelopen zaterdag met de leugen, dat het bombardement op een begrafenis ceremonie** in Jemen, waarbij 140 doden (het mij laatst bekende cijfer) vielen, ‘een vergissing was’, terwijl S.A na te zijn gewaarschuwd, dat het om een begrafenisceremonie ging, zelfs de hulpverleners heeft beschoten………

De oorlogsvoering van het Saoedische leger tegen de Houthi rebellen, is al ongelofelijk asymmetrisch***, daar kan de grootste terreur entiteit op onze aardbol, de VS, nog wel even een schep bovenop doen……

Godverdomme wat een schoftentuig!!

Sleep de VS, Saoedi-Arabië en Groot-Brittannië (dat munitie, waaronder clusterbommen en militaire hardware levert aan S.A.) voor het Internationaal Strafhof, vanwege verregaande oorlogsmisdaden, ofwel grootscheepse terreur!!

Gelukkig begint Iran het meer en meer op te nemen voor de Houthi’s, iets dat de VS ongelofelijk steekt, men wil Jemen vanwege de strategische ligging in handen van VS en S.A. getrouwen houden. Zijn we terug bij het begin: de reden dat de VS zich nu direct met de strijd in Jemen gaat bemoeien….. De VS en Groot-Brittannië leverden al enorme hoeveelheden oorlogstuig aan S.A., bovendien schijnt de VS ‘militaire adviseurs’ (ofwel speciale troepen) in Jemen te hebben, die het psychopathische terreurleger van S.A. terzijde staan………

Nogmaals: vergeet bij dit alles niet, dat de Houthi rebellen, Al Qaida en ISIS bestrijden, die vrij toegang tot Jemen kregen, onder de laatste (vrijwillig) afgetreden president Al-Hadi van Jemen en daar zijn de Houthi’s tot grote woede van S.A. heel goed in…… Vandaar dat S.A. deze afgetreden president Al-Hadi verzochten alsnog een beroep op hen te doen, een beroep tot het herstellen van zijn wezenloze, corrupte en terreurvriendelijke regering, zodat Saoedi-Arabië de bevolking van Jemen kon gaan bestoken, o.a. met de eerder gemelde Britse clusterbommen…….

Intussen hebben de Houthi’s in wanhoop ook hulp gevraagd van Rusland……

Fijn ook dat u in de reguliere media ‘zoveel hoort over de ongelijke strijd in Jemen’ en als u al iets hoort over deze oorlog, dan wordt er over het algemeen godbetert ook nog eens fiks gelogen…….

*  Zie: ‘Witte Huis juristen waarschuwden Obama al in 2015 voor aanklachten wegens oorlogsmisdaden

** Zie: ‘Saoedi-Arabië bombardeert begrafenis ceremonie in Jemen, VS ‘heroverweegt’ wapenleveranties……….

*** Met asymmetrische oorlogsvoering doel ik op de volkomen ongelijke strijd, immers de tot de tanden met de modernste wapens, uitgeruste reli-fascistische dictatuur Saoedi-Arabië, neemt het op tegen Houthi rebellen, die het op het gebied van wapens en ander militair wapentuig aan veel ontbreekt, om een voorbeeld te noemen: een luchtmacht…….. Tegenwoordig gebruikt men de aanduiding ‘asymmetrische oorlogsvoering’ ten onrechte voor een ‘chaotische oorlog’, of ‘oorlog tegen terreur’.

Zie ook (met mogelijkheid tot vertaling in ‘Dutch’): ‘U.S. and U.K. Continue to Participate in War Crimes, Targeting of Yemeni Civilians

en: ‘Gulf of Tonkin 2.0? US Using Unconfirmed Attack on Navy Ship to Quietly Start War With Iran & Russia

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Obama dreigt Putin met nucleaire oorlog, ofwel WOIII, dat was wel een Nobelprijs waard!!

De VS denkt werkelijk een nucleaire oorlog te kunnen winnen, te zot voor woorden en een enorm verraad aan het grootste deel van de eigen bevolking, die net zo hard tot slachtoffer gebombardeerd zal worden als de door de VS bestookte tegenpartij (Rusland)……..

Nadat de VS net als Groot-Brittannië een paar maanden geleden al heeft aangegeven, niet terug te deinzen, kernraketten in te zetten bij een (eerste) aanval. Uiteraard tegen Rusland, al werd dat er door beide terreurstaten niet bij vermeld…….. Daarmee werd een eind gemaakt aan het tijdperk, dat de ‘atoombom’ (kernraket) een afschrikkingsmiddel en daarmee een defensief middel was, tegen de ‘atoombommen’ van de tegenpartij………

Afgelopen zaterdag vond ik het volgende artikel op het blog van Stan van Houcke. Het betreft een interview met vicepresident Biden, dat gisteren werd uitgezonden op NBC. Volgens Biden zal Obama gepaste maatregelen nemen, mocht Trump op 3 november a.s. de presidentsverkiezingen winnen……. De gepaste maatregelen, waar Biden op doelt, kunnen volgens Eric Zuesse niets anders zijn, dan een nucleaire aanval inzetten tegen Rusland……

De regering Obama en de rest van de democratische partij, doen hun best Putin te beschuldigen van inmenging in de VS verkiezingen…….. Zo zou Rusland zich al actief via computer hacks hebben bemoeid met de voorverkiezingen in de VS, aldus het bloeddorstig geteisem in Washington…… Alsof de verkiezingen in de VS eerlijke democratische verkiezingen zijn, waar niets op aan te merken is…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Moet u nagaan: als er een ‘land’ op de wereld is, dat zich bemoeit met regeringen elders, is het de VS wel: als een land niet VS gunstig gestemd is, probeert de VS eerst middels een opstand, deze regering weg te krijgen voor een wel VS gunstig gestemde variant. Als dit niet lukt, begint de VS desnoods een illegale oorlog……

De laatste 15 jaar is de VS al 4 keer een illegale oorlog begonnen….. Of wacht even: eigenlijk 5, daar de oorlog die de door de VS geparachuteerde corrupte neonazi-vriend en juntaleider Porosjenko tegen de bevolking in het oosten van Oekraïne is begonnen, een voortvloeisel is uit het hiervoor genoemde scenario. De VS stak 4 miljard dollar in de opstand, die in Oekraïne tot de door de VS gewenste staatsgreep leidde…

Kortom: Obama sluit WOIII op basis van een leugen niet uit!

Lees en huiver:

President
Obama Threatens President Putin with Nuclear War

Posted
on 
October
14, 2016
 by Eric
Zuesse.

Eric Zuesse

It’ll
be at a time of our choosing,” says U.S. Vice President Joe Biden,
on NBC’’s “Meet the Press,” to be aired on Sunday, October
16th.

Interviewer
Chuck Todd had asked him, “Why would he [Obama] send a message out
to Putin?” Biden pursed his lips, paused, and said, with a grim
look on his face, “We sent him the message.” Of course that
didn’t answer Todd’s question, which was “Why?” Biden and
Todd both remained silent for another tense moment. Then, Biden
picked up again: “We have the capacity to do it, and, uh,” and
Todd interrupted him there with “He’ll know it?” Biden replied:
“He’ll know it, and it’ll be at a time of our choosing, and
under circumstances that have the greatest impact. Uh, the capacity
to do, to fundamentally alter the election, is not what people think;
and, uh, I tell you what: to the extent that they do [‘do’
presumably meaning: fundamentally alter the election], we will be
proportionate in what we do. And, uh,” Todd again interrupted his
interviewee, and said, “So, a message is going to be sent. Will the
public know?” Biden replied, “Hope not.”

Of
course, that “Hope not” could mean many things. It might mean: A
blitz nuclear attack in line with our government’s belief that we
now enjoy 
Nuclear
Primacy
 (an
idea that was first 
published
by the Council on Foreign Relations
 in
2006, and which has never yet been renounced by the U.S. government,
during the decade since). That would be very much a public response,
which Biden would “hope not” to be ’necessary’. In other
words: Biden might have meant, there: “I hope it won’t have to be
that.” But, clearly, Biden isn’t wanting the public to understand
anything, other than that President Obama has threatened President
Putin, with something, and that it will be “proportionate,” and
the excuse for it will be — if it will happen — that Putin had
done something which Obama thinks caused Hillary Clinton to lose the
election to Donald Trump.

Standing
behind what Biden is saying there, is the belief that Putin does have
in his possession some option that might “fundamentally alter the
election.” This is clearly a threat that’s meant to deter Putin
from doing something that Putin hasn’t yet done. Obama is telling
Putin that either the winner will be the person he wants to be his
successor, or else — or else what?

In
other words: what Biden is saying, is that, if Trump wins this
election, then there is going to be some sudden, unannounced, U.S.
government response against Putin, and that only after it is over,
will the U.S. government explain to the public why it did what it
did.

But,
of course, that assumes Americans will still be alive, even if
Russians are not; and, so, if the “proportionate” response turns
out to be a blitz nuclear attack against Russia, then anyone who is
still alive will be wondering: what was it ‘proportionate’ to?

The
United States is no longer — at least not in Syria — actually
fighting the thing that Trump calls “extremist Islamic terrorism”:
we are instead 
arming
Al Qaeda in Syria to overthrow and replace Putin’s ally, Bashar
al-Assad, there
.
All of the U.S. government’s talk against “ISIL” (the Sauds’
preferred acronym for “ISIS”) is mere distraction from the tens
of thousands of other jihadist fighters from other jihadist groups
that have also been imported by the U.S. and Saudi governments into
Syria as Obama’s and the Sauds’ “boots on the ground” to
overthrow Assad there. The leadership now for all of those jihadist
groups (except for ISIS itself) is, in fact, Al Qaeda in Syria, which
has gone under the name “al-Nusra.” Nusra is supplying the
leadership now to all the jihadist factions that have been sent into
Syria; Nusra is the only jihadist group that possesses the long
experience and training in jihad and military matters, which is
needed in order to be able to overthrow Assad. 
Al
Qaeda is now America’s essential ally, at doing what the U.S.
government most wants to do: overthrow and replace Assad.
 The
U.S. is deadly serious about that intention, as can be seen 
here
from the NBC News preview video of their interview with Biden
,
from which the above quotations are sourced. Looking at Biden’s
face there, one can see that this is deadly serious. This isn’t
about sexual aggression — either Donald Trump’s or Bill Clinton’s
— it’s about the survival of civilization, or else nuclear war.

There
have been many reports in the U.S. press saying that Obama has, ever
since at least October 6th, been contemplating an all-out U.S.
bombing campaign to bring down Assad. But that would mean war with
Russia, which has been actively bombing Nusra and all the other
jihadists in Syria. 

Hillary
Clinton is urging a 
“no-fly
zone” in Syria
,
so that we can do to Assad what we did to another ally of Moscow,
Muammar Gaddafi. However, when that was done to Gaddafi, Putin stood
aside and wasn’t supplying military assistance to Gaddafi, which
would have enabled Gaddafi to wipe out the fundamentalist Muslims who
were trying to overthrow him. Russia is involved actively, this time,
to prevent happening in Syria what happened in Libya. A no-fly zone
in Syria would thus mean U.S. war against Russia.

These
are tense times. Any escalation that the U.S. can do against Russia,
can be met by an escalation that Russia can do against the United
States.

Consequently,
whatever escalation Obama is now threatening against Putin, might be
met by an escalation on the other side. Where will it stop, or would
it even be able to stop?

Whatever
escalation Obama might consider to be ‘proportionate’, could
consequently end up ending the world as we know it — and not for
the better. 
Hillary
Clinton has threatened Putin with war
;
now Barack Obama has done likewise.

Whatever
Biden’s assignment here actually was from Obama, one thing about it
is clear: this President is determined that Hillary Clinton be his
successor, and Obama will target anyone who gets in his way if he
doesn’t win his way on this. And Obama wants the American public to
know that this is how he feels about the matter. 

This
Biden-interview is really intended, in that sense, to be a threat
aimed at America’s voters, telling them, telling each one of us:
Vote for Hillary Clinton, or else! He’s not telling us what that
“or else!” is going to be — and maybe he himself has
no accurate idea of how far it will ultimately cycle
and go. Ultimately, whatever he thinks it would be, might not turn
out to be the last step in this cycle of escalation — unless it’s
going to go directly to a blitz attack against
Russia.

Obama
is thus coercing us, before he coerces Putin. He’s telling
us: If we vote against Hillary Clinton — if she
loses this election — then President Obama has something in mind
that we won’t like — and he won’t wait until the next President
is inaugurated on 20 January 2017 to do it, whatever ‘it’ might
be. Obama here is threatenting not only Vladimir Putin, but the
American people. Even if Obama truly believes that he alone possesses
all the power, he does not, unless he possesses the power to
terrorize America’s voters to elect Hillary Clinton, even if we
otherwise would not.

Investigative
historian Eric Zuesse is the author, most recently, of  
They’re
Not Even Close: The Democratic vs. Republican Economic Records,
1910-2010
, and
of  
CHRIST’S
VENTRILOQUISTS: The Event that Created Christianity
.

http://www.washingtonsblog.com/2016/10/president-obama-threatens-president-putin-nuclear-war.html

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Witte Huis juristen waarschuwden Obama al in 2015 voor aanklachten wegens oorlogsmisdaden

Juristen en hoge beambten van het Witte Huis, waarschuwden Obama al in 2015 voor het gevaar, dat de VS een aanklacht wegens oorlogsmisdaden aan de broek zou kunnen krijgen (that’ll be the day!’)*. Dit vanwege de oorlogsmisdaden die Saoedi-Arabië begaat tegen de bevolking van Jemen, in hun volkomen ongelijke strijd tegen de Houthi rebellen, die met een voormalig president het land proberen te bevrijden van IS en Al Qaida……….. Over asymmetrische oorlogsvoering gesproken!! (daarover zo meer)

NB de VS heeft ervoor gezorgd, dat de buitenlandse helpers van psychopathische moordenaar Charles Taylor, ook voor oorlogsmisdaden werden veroordeeld door het Internationaal Strafhof (dat de VS zelf niet erkent….)…… Onder die buitenlanders bevonden zich twee personen, die de VS verdacht van betrokkenheid bij de aanslagen van 911 (2001), vandaar………

Dat was dan ook precies, waarvoor Obama werd gewaarschuwd, een zelfde veroordeling vanwege de enorme leveringen van militair tuig aan Saoedi-Arabië……. Zo verkocht de VS vanaf maart 2015 tot februari 2016, voor maar liefst 22,2 miljard dollar aan militair wapentuig (uiteraard inclusief ‘hardware’)……… Van dat wapentuig, was 1,29 miljard dollar bestemd voor de strijd tegen de Houthi rebellen, te weten: ‘precisie munitie……’

Ik vond e.e.a gisteren op Deutsche Wirtschafts Nachrichten. Waar overigens niet eens werd gemeld, dat de VS de reli-fascistische politiestaat S.A. ook nog eens helpt met ‘militaire adviseurs…’

Tot zover het bericht op DWN. Je zou bijna gaan denken, dat e.e.a. samenhangt met de klacht die de VS eergisteren bekend maakte: de Houthi rebellen, steevast met de toevoeging door de VS, ‘door Iran gesteund’**,  hebben voor de tweede keer in twee dagen een kruisraket afgeschoten op een kruiser van de VS marine……….

Uiteraard is dit een smerige leugen! BBC World Service bracht dit bericht gisteren in het radionieuws van 1.30 u., met de toevoeging, dat als vergelding twee radarposten van de Houthi’s werden platgegooid……. De Houthi’s beschikken niet over vliegtuigen, terwijl ze zich tegen de modernste straaljagers en bommenwerpers moeten verdedigen……

Met het uitschakelen van radarposten kan men zelfs de bevolking niet meer waarschuwen voor de psychopathische moordenaars uit S.A………. (zoals gezegd: over asymmetrische oorlogvoering gesproken!) Vreemd ook: als de Houthi’s raketten hebben, hoe kan het dan dat ze nooit een bommenwerper van S.A. uit de lucht hebben kunnen halen?? Overigens kan je gezien het voorgaande stellen, dat ook dit uitschakelen van radarposten door de VS, een enorme oorlogsmisdaad is…….

De situatie in Jemen is niet te vergelijken met die in Aleppo, ook al willen de reguliere media, politici en ‘opiniemakers’ u daar dagelijks van overtuigen. In Jemen zijn intussen de eerste kinderen overleden aan ondervoeding, bovendien is het sterfte cijfer onder de burgerbevolking hoog, daar S.A., naast het bombarderen van woonwijken en nutsvoorzieningen als de watervoorziening, systematisch ziekenhuizen (en scholen en moskeeën) bombardeert……..

Saoedi-Arabië heeft de havens gebombardeerd en de landingsbanen van vliegvelden, zodat er geen noodvoorraden met voedsel, water, medicijnen en brandstof kunnen worden aangevoerd, ook de aanvoerwegen van andere aangrenzende landen (dan S.A.) zijn gebombardeerd, of worden gecontroleerd door S.A.

Wanneer is eindelijk het moment aangebroken, dat de grootste terreur-entiteit op aarde, de VS en haar hulp in het Midden-Oosten: Saoedi-Arabië (en Israël), eindelijk voor het Internationaal Strafhof worden gedaagd voor de onmetelijk uitgeoefende terreur….. Zie wat dit betreft ook: ‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds WOII……..

Overigens levert ook Groot-Brittannië wapens en munitie, o.a. clusterbommen (!!), aan Saoedi-Arabië en laten we de ‘mooie rol’ van Nederland niet vergeten…….

*   Alsof het de eerste keer is, dat de VS oorlogsmisdaden begaat……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

** De VS en S.A. hebben al een paar keer geprobeerd Iran te beschuldigen van wapenleveranties aan de Houthi’s. Beide keren doorgeprikt als flagrante leugens, het betrof schepen met noodhulp voor de Houthi’s, die net als Iran de sjiitische tak van de islam aanhangen…… Nog steeds, ook bij tijd en wijle door Nederlandse politici en reguliere media, wordt e.e.a. herhaalt als zijnde de waarheid (die ‘wapenleveranties’ van Iran…)……

Hier de link naar het artikel op DWN.

Zie ook: ‘Saoedi-Arabië bombardeert begrafenis ceremonie in Jemen, VS ‘heroverweegt’ wapenleveranties……….‘ Wat betreft die wapenleveranties: met het zogenaamde beschieten van een VS kruiser, kan de VS doorgaan met het leveren van wapentuig aan S.A……..

       en: ‘VS heeft reden gefabriceerd om de Houthi rebellen in Jemen te bombarderen…….

      en: ‘Giro 555: honger en oorlog in Jemen: waarom worden Saoedi-Arabië, de VS en GB niet aan de paal genageld wegens enorme oorlogsmisdaden???

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden, dit geldt niet voor het label ‘Taylor’.

Saoedi-Arabië bombardeert begrafenis ceremonie in Jemen, VS ‘heroverweegt’ wapenleveranties……….

Gistermorgen in het nieuws van 8.30 u. op Radio1, het bericht dat Saoedi-Arabië een begrafenisceremonie in Jemen had gebombardeerd……. ‘Resultaat’: 82 dode burgerslachtoffers en meer dan 500 gewonden (waaronder zwaar gewonden….)…… Intussen is het aantal vermoorde rouwenden opgelopen tot 140……..

Het zoveelste bloedbad dat Saoedi-Arabië aanricht in Jemen, waarbij tot nu toe altijd de VS, Groot-Brittannië en Frankrijk (inclusief veel ander NAVO landen) de reli-fascistische psychopaten uit S.A. steunen, zowel politiek, militair als middels leveringen van munitie en militaire ‘hardware……’ De Houthi’s die S.A. bestrijdt, zijn tenslotte sjiieten en aangezien de hoofdmoot van die gelovigen in Iran wonen, zegt het grootste deel van het westen niets over de bloedbaden die Saoedi-Arabië onder de Houthi’s aanricht……..

Eén klein verschil dit keer: de VS liet na dit bloedbad weten, dat het de wapenleveranties aan deze psychopathische moordenaars ‘heroverweegt…….’ U snapt natuurlijk wel, hoe die ‘heroverweging’ zal uitpakken, juist: de VS blijft Saoedi-Arabië gewoon steunen……..

Obama en het Pentagon moesten natuurlijk net doen, of ze zwaar verontwaardigd zijn, immers als je met zoveel tamtam en pure leugens Rusland en Assad zwart maakt, moet je nu net doen, of je het allemaal heel vreselijk vindt…… Groot-Brittannië levert godverdomme zelfs clusterbommen aan Saoedi-Arabië…..

Trouwens over Rusland gesproken: Saoedi-Arabië had het gore lef in de VN om sancties tegen Rusland te eisen, dit vanwege het bestrijden door Rusland van de door S.A. gesteunde psychopathische moordenaars……* Psychopathische moordenaars die onder meerdere namen, maar vooral al-Nusra, Al Qaida en IS, Assad willen verdrijven en een ware terreur uitoefenen op de bevolking, óók in Oost-Aleppo……..

Saoedi-Arabië opereert NB illegaal met de bombardementen op Syrisch grondgebied, die het samen met het al even illegaal aanwezig zijnde VS uitvoert. S.A. zet zich zogenaamd in voor de burgers in Aleppo, met haar steun aan de terreurgroepen.

Hetzelfde Saoedi-Arabië, dat na elke gesloten wapenstilstand, de ‘gematigde terreurgroepen’ het dringende advies geeft door te vechten, zoals S.A. (en de VS) dit ook bij de laatste wapenstilstand heeft gedaan…… Daarmee wil S.A. de terreurgroepen de kans geven, zich te hergroeperen en munitie aan te vullen, eventueel met het modernste wapentuig uit de VS………. De enige partij, die zich bij de laatste wapenstilstand vanaf het begin aan die wapenstilstand heeft gehouden, was de coalitie van het reguliere Syrische leger en de Russen…… De VS ging zelfs zover stellingen van dat Syrische leger te bombarderen op 17 september jl., waarbij meer dan 100 Syrische militairen omkwamen….. Zogenaamd per ongeluk, één uur lang bombarderen…..!!!

De situatie voor de inwoners van Jemen, is intussen ronduit verschrikkelijk. Door blokkades van havens (middels bombardementen) en wegen, zijn er grote tekorten ontstaan en volgens ngo’s sterven er dagelijks kinderen aan ondervoeding……. Ongelofelijk, dat men hier zo weinig aandacht aan besteedt in het westen, zeker gezien alle enorme leugens aangaande Syrië, die men met grote graagte keer op keer prominent brengt………. Over de leugens van de reguliere westerse media i.z. Aleppo, zal ik straks nog een bericht publiceren.

* De VS, meerdere NAVO landen en een aantal andere dictatoriaal geregeerde arabische staten doen vrolijk mee aan het steunen van terreurgroepen, die men liefkozend ‘gematigde rebellen’ noemt……

Zie ook: ‘Rusland en Syrië worden o.a. door Frankrijk beschuldigt van terreur in Aleppo……… De vraag is wie de ware terroristen zijn.

       en: ‘Witte Huis juristen waarschuwden Obama al in 2015 voor aanklachten wegens oorlogsmisdaden

       en: ‘VS heeft reden gefabriceerd om de Houthi rebellen in Jemen te bombarderen…….

      en: ‘Giro 555: honger en oorlog in Jemen: waarom worden Saoedi-Arabië, de VS en GB niet aan de paal genageld wegens enorme oorlogsmisdaden???

Klik voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

Rob de Wijk: in Rusland speelt het nucleaire denken een steeds grotere rol…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Gistermiddag op BNR (rond 15.45 u.) oorlogshitser en speciaal lobbyist van het militair-industrieel complex, grootfantast Rob de Wijk. Beste lezer excuseer maar ik heb niet al de leugens van de Wijk aan kunnen horen, daar mij een plotselinge ongesteldheid overviel >> projectiel kotsend naar de wc dus…..

De reden? Ik stemde af op BNR en ja hoor koekwaus de Wijk aan het woord in het ‘beste buitenlandprogramma van Nederland’ (ha! ha! ha! ha!) dat van opperoliebol Hammelburg. De Wijk heeft tegenwoordig een eigen oorlogshitsers-bureau, althans hij speelt daar directeur: het Haagse Centrum voor Strategische Studies (HCSS). Waarschijnlijk met fiks wat subsidie in de vorm van overheidsopdrachten……..

De Wijk stelde dat het nucleaire denken in Rusland een steeds grotere rol speelt……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Alsof de oplichter niet weet, dat zowel Groot-Brittannië en de VS hebben gesteld dat ze een eerste slag met nucleaire wapens niet uit de weg gaan……. Zoals u en de Wijk weten, heeft niet Rusland ooit de atoombom tegen burgers gebruikt, maar de VS, dat was tevens de laatste keer, tot nu……. Niet Rusland is de laatste 15 jaar vier illegale oorlogen begonnen, maar de VS…..

Bovendien is de VS al ver met een raketschild, op een paar plaatsen langs de Russische grens. Een schild zogenaamd tegen Iraanse raketten, terwijl die helemaal geen behoefte hebben aan oorlog met de EU……. De raketten in dat schild kunnen in een mum van tijd worden aangepast voor het dragen van kernkoppen en zijn daarmee een direct gevaar voor Rusland……. Alsof de Wijk dat niet weet…..

Dan voert de NAVO de ene grootscheepse militaire oefening na de andere langs diezelfde Russische grens, dat zou Rusland eens moeten proberen aan de Mexicaanse grens met de VS…… Overigens datzelfde geldt voor het plaatsen van raketten, alsof de Wijk dat niet weet……. Overigens zijn die grootscheepse militaire oefeningen de reden, dat de NAVO loopt te schreeuwen om nog meer geld, terwijl de NAVO landen samen, meer dan dertien keer zoveel uit aan defensie, dan Rusland en China samen (Italië, Frankrijk, Duitsland en Groot-Brittannië geven allen al zeven keer meer uit aan defensie, dan Rusland….)…….

Uiteraard kreeg Putin weer onder uit de zak: dat Rusland op het foute pad is blijkt wel uit het feit, dat Rusland De Krim heeft geannexeerd en zoals het bezig is in Oost-Oekraïne, aldus de Wijk……

Echter niet Rusland breidde haar militaire macht steeds verder uit in de richting van bijvoorbeeld Nederland, juist de NAVO is tegen de afspraken in (afspraken met Gorbatsjov gemaakt), steeds verder opgerukt richting Russische grens…. De grens waarlangs deze uiterst agressieve organisatie nu dan ook voor het grootste deel te vinden is, NB met internationale troepen……. Alsof smerige leugenaar de Wijk dat niet weet.

Rusland heeft De Krim niet geannexeerd: de bewoners, ook de oorspronkelijke bevolking, koos met een overweldigende meerheid van stemmen voor aansluiting bij Rusland, een referendum dat volgens internationale waarnemers eerlijk is verlopen!!!! Alsof de Wijk dat niet weet……

In Oekraïne bevinden zich geen Russen, anders dan een handjevol vrijwilligers, zoals er ook westerse fascisten (heel wat meer dan de paar Russen in Oost-Oekraïne) meevechten aan de andere kant, die van juntaleider en corrupte neonazi-vriend Porosjenko (fascisten o.a. uit Nederland). Echter, als je de Wijk moet geloven, vecht het Russische leger in Oost-Oekraïne….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Als dat de waarheid zou zijn, waren Porosjenko en z’n fascistenclub allang het land uitgeschopt!! Het kan echter nog gekker mensen: in Oekraïne zijn wel degelijk VS en NAVO militairen aanwezig, o.a. voor training en ‘advies’, voorts levert de VS wapens aan de fascistische junta van Porosjenko…..

Over de VS gesproken, dat land heeft de opstand in Oekraïne geregisseerd en van geld voorzien (4 miljard dollar!!), dit met de bedoeling de democratisch gekozen president Janoekovytsj te verdrijven…. Dat Janoekovytsj werd verdreven, is als voor de bewoners van De Krim, de reden dat de bewoners uit het oosten van Oekraïne in opstand kwamen, zij hadden massaal op hem gestemd!! Alsof de Wijk dat niet weet en als hij het niet weet, is hij geen knip voor z’n oorlogshitsers neus waard!!!

De Wijk durfde zelfs Syrië aan te halen, waar hij Putin als agressor in dat land afschilderde, terwijl Rusland legaal aanwezig is in Syrië, wat niet geldt voor de moorddadige coalitie van de VS (dat zelf wel degelijk op de grond meevecht, o.a aan de kant van de Turken…..)……

Alsof Rusland de opstand in Syrië op poten heeft gezet, onder meer door buitenlandse strijders naar Syrië te halen, te trainen en van wapens te voorzien, psychopathische moordenaars die deel uitmaken van IS, Al Qaida, al-Nusra en ga nog maar even door, terroristen, die het westen liefkozend ‘gematigde rebellen’ noemt…….

Daar weer over gesproken: de Wijk durfde te zeggen, dat Putin een dictator is, die schijt heeft aan democratie. Een figuur als Putin kan ook het voortouw nemen, als het om Syrië gaat, aldus de Wijk…… Ja ja, hij durft hè?? Maar dat was ‘t nog niet mensen: in een democratie als in Amerika (de zakkenwasser bedoelt de VS, of Noord Amerika), kan Obama niet zo opereren als Putin, aldus de leugenaar wijsneus…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Onder Obama is de VS maar liefst twee illegale oorlogen begonnen, die in Libië en die in Syrië, wat betreft die laatste, zoals gezegd, met alle voorbereidingen o.a. door Killary Clinton…..

De eerste onderhandelingen van de VS met een aantal landen, als Saoedi-Arabië, Turkije en Groot-Brittannie, om Assad omver te werpen, dateren al uit 2006. Hillary Clinton had de boel zover, dat met hulp van een groot aantal buitenlandse psychopathische moordenaars, in 2011 de eerste aanvallen tegen het Syrische bewind werden ingezet….. Alsof de Wijk dat niet weet…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Jezus wat een smerige oplichter en volksverlakker!!

Moet u nagaan, heb ik het niet eens gehad over het gigantisch aantal standrechtelijke executies van verdachten (waar voor meer dan 90% onverdachte burgerslachtoffers vallen), die de VS middels drones in een fiks deel van de wereld begaat……. Over grootschalige terreur gesproken…….

Zie ook: ‘VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds WOII……..‘ (en ook dat is geen gelul!)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht terug kan vinden.

VS vermoordde meer dan 20 miljoen mensen sinds het einde van WOII……..

Kwam gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een lijst met oorlogen tegen, die de VS sinds WOII heeft gevoerd. Voor velen geen nieuws maar het is schokkend om alles nog eens op een rij te zien, een gruwelijk naslagwerk over de daden van de grootste terreur entiteit op aarde: de VS…….

US
Has Killed More Than 20 Million In 37 Nations Since WWII

After
the catastrophic attacks of September 11 2001 monumental sorrow and a
feeling of desperate and understandable anger began to permeate the
American psyche. A few people at that time attempted to promote a
balanced perspective by pointing out that the United States had also
been responsible for causing those same feelings in people in other
nations, but they produced hardly a ripple. Although 

Americans
understand in the abstract the wisdom of people around the world
empathizing with the suffering of one another, such a reminder of
wrongs committed by our nation got little hearing and was soon
overshadowed by an accelerated “war on terrorism.”

But
we must continue our efforts to develop understanding and compassion
in the world. Hopefully, this article will assist in doing that by
addressing the question “How many September 11ths has the United
States caused in other nations since WWII?” This theme is developed
in this report which contains an estimated numbers of such deaths in
37 nations as well as brief explanations of why the U.S. is
considered culpable.

The
causes of wars are complex. In some instances nations other than the
U.S. may have been responsible for more deaths, but if the
involvement of our nation appeared to have been a necessary cause of
a war or conflict it was considered responsible for the deaths in it.
In other words they probably would not have taken place if the U.S.
had not used the heavy hand of its power. The military and economic
power of the United States was crucial.

This
study reveals that U.S. military forces were directly responsible for
about 10 to 15 million deaths during the Korean and Vietnam Wars and
the two Iraq Wars. The Korean War also includes Chinese deaths while
the Vietnam War also includes fatalities in Cambodia and Laos.

The
American public probably is not aware of these numbers and knows even
less about the proxy wars for which the United States is also
responsible. In the latter wars there were between nine and 14
million deaths in Afghanistan, Angola, Democratic Republic of the
Congo, East Timor, Guatemala, Indonesia, Pakistan and Sudan.

But
the victims are not just from big nations or one part of the world.
The remaining deaths were in smaller ones which constitute over half
the total number of nations. Virtually all parts of the world have
been the target of U.S. intervention.

The
overall conclusion reached is that the United States most likely has
been responsible since WWII for the deaths of between 20 and 30
million people in wars and conflicts scattered over the world.

To
the families and friends of these victims it makes little difference
whether the causes were U.S. military action, proxy military forces,
the provision of U.S. military supplies or advisors, or other ways,
such as economic pressures applied by our nation. They had to make
decisions about other things such as finding lost loved ones, whether
to become refugees, and how to survive.

And
the pain and anger is spread even further. Some authorities estimate
that there are as many as 10 wounded for each person who dies in
wars. Their visible, continued suffering is a continuing reminder to
their fellow countrymen.

It
is essential that Americans learn more about this topic so that they
can begin to understand the pain that others feel. Someone once
observed that the Germans during WWII “chose not to know.” We
cannot allow history to say this about our country. The question
posed above was “How many September 11ths has the United States
caused in other nations since WWII?” The answer is: possibly
10,000.

Comments
on Gathering These Numbers


Generally
speaking, the much smaller number of Americans who have died is not
included in this study, not because they are not important, but
because this report focuses on the impact of U.S. actions on its
adversaries.

An
accurate count of the number of deaths is not easy to achieve, and
this collection of data was undertaken with full realization of this
fact. These estimates will probably be revised later either upward or
downward by the reader and the author. But undoubtedly the total will
remain in the millions.

The
difficulty of gathering reliable information is shown by two
estimates in this context. For several years I heard statements on
radio that three million Cambodians had been killed under the rule of
the Khmer Rouge. However, in recent years the figure I heard was one
million. Another example is that the number of persons estimated to
have died in Iraq due to sanctions after the first U.S. Iraq War was
over 1 million, but in more recent years, based on a more recent
study, a lower estimate of around a half a million has emerged.

Often
information about wars is revealed only much later when someone
decides to speak out, when more secret information is revealed due to
persistent efforts of a few, or after special congressional
committees make reports

Both
victorious and defeated nations may have their own reasons for
underreporting the number of deaths. Further, in recent wars
involving the United States it was not uncommon to hear statements
like “we do not do body counts” and references to “collateral
damage” as a euphemism for dead and wounded. Life is cheap for
some, especially those who manipulate people on the battlefield as if
it were a chessboard.

To
say that it is difficult to get exact figures is not to say that we
should not try. Effort was needed to arrive at the figures of 6six
million Jews killed during WWI, but knowledge of that number now is
widespread and it has fueled the determination to prevent future
holocausts. That struggle continues.

The
author can be contacted at 
jlucas511@woh.rr.com

37
VICTIM NATIONS

Afghanistan

The
U.S. is responsible for between 1 and 1.8 million deaths during the
war between the Soviet Union and Afghanistan, by luring the Soviet
Union into invading that nation. (1,2,3,4)

The
Soviet Union had friendly relations its neighbor, Afghanistan, which
had a secular government. The Soviets feared that if that government
became fundamentalist this change could spill over into the Soviet
Union.

In
1998, in an interview with the Parisian publication Le Novel
Observateur, Zbigniew Brzezinski, adviser to President Carter,
admitted that he had been responsible for instigating aid to the
Mujahadeen in Afghanistan which caused the Soviets to invade. In his
own words:

According
to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began
during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded
Afghanistan on 24 December 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded
until now, is completely otherwise. Indeed, it was July 3, 1979 that
President Carter signed the first directive for secret aid to the
opponents of the pro-Soviet regime in Kabul. And that very day, I
wrote a note to the President in which I explained to him that in my
opinion this aid was going to induce a Soviet military intervention.”
(5,1,6)

Brzezinski
justified laying this trap, since he said it gave the Soviet Union
its Vietnam and caused the breakup of the Soviet Union. “Regret
what?” he said. “That secret operation was an excellent idea. It
had the effect of drawing the Russians into the Afghan trap and you
want me to regret it?” (7)

The
CIA spent 5 to 6 billion dollars on its operation in Afghanistan in
order to bleed the Soviet Union. (1,2,3) When that 10-year war ended
over a million people were dead and Afghan heroin had captured 60% of
the U.S. market. (4)

The
U.S. has been responsible directly for about 12,000 deaths in
Afghanistan many of which resulted from bombing in retaliation for
the attacks on U.S. property on September 11, 2001. Subsequently U.S.
troops invaded that country. (4)

Angola

An
indigenous armed struggle against Portuguese rule in Angola began in
1961. In 1977 an Angolan government was recognized by the U.N.,
although the U.S. was one of the few nations that opposed this
action. In 1986 Uncle Sam approved material assistance to UNITA, a
group that was trying to overthrow the government. Even today this
struggle, which has involved many nations at times, continues.

U.S.
intervention was justified to the U.S. public as a reaction to the
intervention of 50,000 Cuban troops in Angola. However, according to
Piero Gleijeses, a history professor at Johns Hopkins University the
reverse was true. The Cuban intervention came as a result of a CIA –
financed covert invasion via neighboring Zaire and a drive on the
Angolan capital by the U.S. ally, South Africa1,2,3). (Three
estimates of deaths range from 300,000 to 750,000 (4,5,6)

Argentina:
See South America: Operation Condor

Bangladesh:
See Pakistan

Bolivia

Hugo
Banzer was the leader of a repressive regime in Bolivia in the 1970s.
The U.S. had been disturbed when a previous leader nationalized the
tin mines and distributed land to Indian peasants. Later that action
to benefit the poor was reversed.

Banzer,
who was trained at the U.S.-operated School of the Americas in Panama
and later at Fort Hood, Texas, came back from exile frequently to
confer with U.S. Air Force Major Robert Lundin. In 1971 he staged a
successful coup with the help of the U.S. Air Force radio system. In
the first years of his dictatorship he received twice as military
assistance from the U.S. as in the previous dozen years together.

A
few years later the Catholic Church denounced an army massacre of
striking tin workers in 1975, Banzer, assisted by information
provided by the CIA, was able to target and locate leftist priests
and nuns. His anti-clergy strategy, known as the Banzer Plan, was
adopted by nine other Latin American dictatorships in 1977. (2) He
has been accused of being responsible for 400 deaths during his
tenure. (1)

Also
see: See South America: Operation Condor

Brazil:
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

U.S.
bombing of Cambodia had already been underway for several years in
secret under the Johnson and Nixon administrations, but when
President Nixon openly began bombing in preparation for a land
assault on Cambodia it caused major protests in the U.S. against the
Vietnam War.

There
is little awareness today of the scope of these bombings and the
human suffering involved.

Immense
damage was done to the villages and cities of Cambodia, causing
refugees and internal displacement of the population. This unstable
situation enabled the Khmer Rouge, a small political party led by Pol
Pot, to assume power. Over the years we have repeatedly heard about
the Khmer Rouge’s role in the deaths of millions in Cambodia
without any acknowledgement being made this mass killing was made
possible by the the U.S. bombing of that nation which destabilized it
by death , injuries, hunger and dislocation of its people.

So
the U.S. bears responsibility not only for the deaths from the
bombings but also for those resulting from the activities of the
Khmer Rouge – a total of about 2.5 million people. Even when
Vietnam latrer invaded Cambodia in 1979 the CIA was still supporting
the Khmer Rouge. (1,2,3)

Also
see Vietnam

Chad

An
estimated 40,000 people in Chad were killed and as many as 200,000
tortured by a government, headed by Hissen Habre who was brought to
power in June, 1982 with the help of CIA money and arms. He remained
in power for eight years. (1,2)

Human
Rights Watch claimed that Habre was responsible for thousands of
killings. In 2001, while living in Senegal, he was almost tried for
crimes committed by him in Chad. However, a court there blocked these
proceedings. Then human rights people decided to pursue the case in
Belgium, because some of 

Habre’s torture victims lived there. The
U.S., in June 2003, told Belgium that it risked losing its status as
host to NATO’s headquarters if it allowed such a legal proceeding
to happen. So the result was that the law that allowed victims to
file complaints in Belgium for atrocities committed abroad was
repealed. 

However, two months later a new law was passed which made
special provision for the continuation of the case against Habre.

Chile

The
CIA intervened in Chile’s 1958 and 1964 elections. In 1970 a
socialist candidate, Salvador Allende, was elected president. The CIA
wanted to incite a military coup to prevent his inauguration, but the
Chilean army’s chief of staff, General Rene Schneider, opposed this
action. The CIA then planned, along with some people in the Chilean
military, to assassinate Schneider. This plot failed and Allende took
office. President Nixon was not to be dissuaded and he ordered the
CIA to create a coup climate: “Make the economy scream,” he
said.

What followed were guerilla warfare, arson, bombing,
sabotage and terror. ITT and other U.S. corporations with Chilean
holdings sponsored demonstrations and strikes. Finally, on September
11, 1973 Allende died either by suicide or by assassination. At that
time Henry Kissinger, U.S. Secretary of State, said the following
regarding Chile: “I don’t see why we need to stand by and watch a
country go communist because of the irresponsibility of its own
people.” (1)

During
17 years of terror under Allende’s successor, General Augusto
Pinochet, an estimated 3,000 Chileans were killed and many others
were tortured or “disappeared.” (2,3,4,5)

Also
see South America: Operation Condor

China
An estimated 900,000 Chinese died during the Korean War. For more
information, See: Korea.

Colombia

One
estimate is that 67,000 deaths have occurred from the 1960s to recent
years due to support by the U.S. of Colombian state terrorism. (1)

According
to a 1994 Amnesty International report, more than 20,000 people were
killed for political reasons in Colombia since 1986, mainly by the
military and its paramilitary allies. Amnesty alleged that “U.S.-
supplied military equipment, ostensibly delivered for use against
narcotics traffickers, was being used by the Colombian military to
commit abuses in the name of “counter-insurgency.” (2) In 2002
another estimate was made that 3,500 people die each year in a U.S.
funded civilian war in Colombia. (3)

In
1996 Human Rights Watch issued a report “Assassination Squads in
Colombia” which revealed that 

CIA agents went to Colombia in 1991
to help the military to train undercover agents in anti-subversive
activity. (4,5)

In
recent years the U.S. government has provided assistance under Plan
Colombia. The Colombian government has been charged with using most
of the funds for destruction of crops and support of the paramilitary
group.

Cuba

In
the Bay of Pigs invasion of Cuba on April 18, 1961 which ended after
3 days, 114 of the invading force were killed, 1,189 were taken
prisoners and a few escaped to waiting U.S. ships. (1) The captured
exiles were quickly tried, a few executed and the rest sentenced to
thirty years in prison for treason. These exiles were released after
20 months in exchange for $53 million in food and medicine.

Some
people estimate that the number of Cuban forces killed range from
2,000, to 4,000. Another estimate is that 1,800 Cuban forces were
killed on an open highway by napalm. This appears to have been a
precursor of the Highway of Death in Iraq in 1991 when U.S. forces
mercilessly annihilated large numbers of Iraqis on a highway. (2)

Democratic
Republic of Congo (formerly Zaire)

The
beginning of massive violence was instigated in this country in 1879
by its colonizer King Leopold of Belgium. The Congo’s population
was reduced by 10 million people over a period of 20 years which some
have referred to as “Leopold’s Genocide.” (1) The U.S. has been
responsible for about a third of t

hat many deaths in that nation in
the more recent past. (2)

In
1960 the Congo became an independent state with Patrice Lumumba being
its first prime minister. He was assassinated with the CIA being
implicated, although some say that his murder was actually the
responsibility of Belgium. (3) But nevertheless, the CIA was planning
to kill him. (4) Before his assassination the CIA sent one of its
scientists, Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, to the Congo carrying “lethal
biological material” intended for use in Lumumba’s assassination.
This virus would have been able to produce a fatal disease indigenous
to the Congo area of Africa and was transported in a diplomatic
pouch.

Much
of the time in recent years there has been a civil war within the
Democratic Republic of Congo, fomented often by the U.S. and other
nations, including neighboring nations. (5)

In
April 1977, Newsday reported that the CIA was secretly supporting
efforts to recruit several hundred mercenaries in the U.S. and Great
Britain to serve alongside Zaire’s army. In that same year the U.S.
provided $15 million of military supplies to the Zairian President
Mobutu to fend off an invasion by a rival group operating in Angola.
(6)

In
May 1979, the U.S. sent several million dollars of aid to Mobutu who
had been condemned 3 months earlier by the U.S. State Department for
human rights violations. (7) During the Cold War the U.S. funneled
over 300 million dollars in weapons into Zaire (8,9) $100 million in
military training was provided to him. (2) In 2001 it was reported to
a U.S. congressional committee that American companies, including one
linked to former President George Bush Sr., were stoking the Congo
for monetary gains. There is an international battle over resources
in that country with over 125 companies and individuals being
implicated. One of these substances is coltan, which is used in the
manufacture of cell phones. (2)


Dominican
Republic

In
1962, Juan Bosch became president of the Dominican Republic. He
advocated such programs as land reform and public works programs.
This did not bode well for his future relationship with the U.S., and
after only 7 months in office, he was deposed by a CIA coup. In 1965
when a group was trying to reinstall him to his office President
Johnson said, “This Bosch is no good.” Assistant Secretary of
State Thomas Mann replied “He’s no good at all. If we don’t get
a decent government in there, Mr. President, we get another Bosch.
It’s just going to be another sinkhole.” Two days later a U.S.
invasion started and 22,000 soldiers and marines entered the
Dominican Republic and about 3,000 Dominicans died during the
fighting. The cover excuse for doing this was that this was done to
protect foreigners there. (1,2,3,4)

East
Timor

In
December 1975, Indonesia invaded East Timor. This incursion was
launched the day after U.S. President Gerald Ford and Secretary of
State Henry Kissinger had left Indonesia where they had given
President Suharto permission to use American arms, which under U.S.
law, could not be used for aggression. Daniel Moynihan, U.S.
ambassador to the UN. said that the U.S. wanted “things to turn out
as they did.” (1,2) The result was an estimated 200,000 dead out of
a population of 700,000. (1,2)

Sixteen
years later, on November 12, 1991, two hundred and seventeen East
Timorese protesters in Dili, many of them children, marching from a
memorial service, were gunned down by Indonesian Kopassus shock
troops who were headed by U.S.- trained commanders Prabowo Subianto
(son in law of General Suharto) and Kiki Syahnakri. Trucks were seen
dumping bodies into the sea. (5)

El
Salvador

The
civil war from 1981 to1992 in El Salvador was financed by $6 billion
in U.S. aid given to support the government in its efforts to crush a
movement to bring social justice to the people in that nation of
about 8 million people. (1)

During that time U.S. military
advisers demonstrated methods of torture on teenage prisoners,
according to an interview with a deserter from the Salvadoran army
published in the New York Times. This former member of the Salvadoran
National Guard testified that he was a member of a squad of twelve
who found people who they were told were guerillas and tortured them.
Part of the training he received was in torture at a U.S. location
somewhere in Panama. (2)

About
900 villagers were massacred in the village of El Mozote in 1981. Ten
of the twelve El Salvadoran government soldiers cited as
participating in this act were graduates of the School of the
Americas operated by the U.S. (2) They were only a small part of
about 75,000 people killed during that civil war. (1)

According
to a 1993 United Nations’ Truth Commission report, over 96 % of the
human rights violations carried out during the war were committed by
the Salvadoran army or the paramilitary deaths squads associated with
the Salvadoran army. (3)

That
commission linked graduates of the School of the Americas to many
notorious killings. The New York Times and the Washington Post
followed with scathing articles. In 1996, the White House Oversight
Board issued a report that supported many of the charges against that
school made by Rev. Roy Bourgeois, head of the School of the Americas
Watch. That same year the Pentagon released formerly classified
reports indicating that graduates were trained in killing, extortion,
and physical abuse for interrogations, false imprisonment and other
methods of control. (4)

Grenada

The
CIA began to destabilize Grenada in 1979 after Maurice Bishop became
president, partially because he refused to join the quarantine of
Cuba. The campaign against him resulted in his overthrow and the
invasion by the U.S. of Grenada on October 25, 1983, with about 277
people dying. (1,2) It was fallaciously charged that an airport was
being built in Grenada that could be used to attack the U.S. and it
was also erroneously claimed that the lives of American medical
students on that island were in danger.

Guatemala

In
1951 Jacobo Arbenz was elected president of Guatemala. He
appropriated some unused land operated by the United Fruit Company
and compensated the company. (1,2) That company then started a
campaign to paint Arbenz as a tool of an international conspiracy and
hired about 300 mercenaries who sabotaged oil supplies and trains.
(3) In 1954 a CIA-orchestrated coup put him out of office and he left
the country. During the next 40 years various regimes killed
thousands of people.

In
1999 the Washington Post reported that an Historical Clarification
Commission concluded that over 200,000 people had been killed during
the civil war and that there had been 42,000 individual human rights
violations, 29,000 of them fatal, 92% of which were committed by the
army. The commission further reported that the U.S. government and
the CIA had pressured the Guatemalan government into suppressing the
guerilla movement by ruthless means. (4,5)

According
to the Commission between 1981 and 1983 the military government of
Guatemala – financed and supported by the U.S. government –
destroyed some four hundred Mayan villages in a campaign of genocide.
(4)

One of the documents made available to the commission was a
1966 memo from a U.S. State Department official, which described how
a “safe house” was set up in the palace for use by Guatemalan
security agents and their U.S. contacts. This was the headquarters
for the Guatemalan “dirty war” against leftist insurgents and
suspected allies. (2)

Haiti

From
1957 to 1986 Haiti was ruled by Papa Doc Duvalier and later by his
son. During that time their private terrorist force killed between
30,000 and 100,000 people. (1) Millions of dollars in CIA subsidies
flowed into Haiti during that time, mainly to suppress popular
movements, (2) although most American military aid to the country,
according to William Blum, was covertly channeled through Israel.

Reportedly,
governments after the second Duvalier reign were responsible for an
even larger number of fatalities, and the influence on Haiti by the
U.S., particularly through the CIA, has continued. The U.S. later
forced out of the presidential office a black Catholic priest, Jean
Bertrand Aristide, even though he was elected with 67% of the vote in
the early 1990s. The wealthy white class in Haiti opposed him in this
predominantly black nation, because of his social programs designed
to help the poor and end corruption. (3) Later he returned to office,
but that did not last long. He was forced by the U.S. to leave office
and now lives in South Africa.


Honduras

In
the 1980s the CIA supported Battalion 316 in Honduras, which
kidnapped, tortured and killed hundreds of its citizens. Torture
equipment and manuals were provided by CIA Argentinean personnel who
worked with U.S. agents in the training of the Hondurans.
Approximately 400 people lost their lives. (1,2) This is another
instance of torture in the world sponsored by the U.S. (3)

Battalion
316 used shock and suffocation devices in interrogations in the
1980s. Prisoners often were kept naked and, when no longer useful,
killed and buried in unmarked graves. Declassified documents and
other sources show that the CIA and the U.S. Embassy knew of numerous
crimes, including murder and torture, yet continued to support
Battalion 316 and collaborate with its leaders.” (4)

Honduras
was a staging ground in the early 1980s for the Contras who were
trying to overthrow the socialist Sandinista government in Nicaragua.
John D. Negroponte, currently Deputy Secretary of State, was our
embassador when our military aid to Honduras rose from $4 million to
$77.4 million per year. Negroponte denies having had any knowledge of
these atrocities during his tenure. However, his predecessor in that
position, Jack R. Binns, had reported in 1981 that he was deeply
concerned at increasing evidence of officially sponsored/sanctioned
assassinations. (5)

Hungary

In
1956 Hungary, a Soviet satellite nation, revolted against the Soviet
Union. During the uprising broadcasts by the U.S. Radio Free Europe
into Hungary sometimes took on an aggressive tone, encouraging the
rebels to believe that Western support was imminent, and even giving
tactical advice on how to fight the Soviets. Their hopes were raised
then dashed by these broadcasts which cast an even darker shadow over
the Hungarian tragedy.“ (1) The Hungarian and Soviet death toll was
about 3,000 and the revolution was crushed. (2)

Indonesia

In
1965, in Indonesia, a coup replaced General Sukarno with General
Suharto as leader. The U.S. played a role in that change of
government. Robert Martens,a former officer in the U.S. embassy in
Indonesia, described how U.S. diplomats and CIA officers provided up
to 5,000 names to Indonesian Army death squads in 1965 and checked
them off as they were killed or captured. Martens admitted that “I
probably have a lot of blood on my hands, but that’s not all bad.
There’s a time when you have to strike hard at a decisive moment.”
(1,2,3) Estimates of the number of deaths range from 500,000 to 3
million. (4,5,6)

From 1993 to 1997 the U.S. provided Jakarta with
almost $400 million in economic aid and sold tens of million of
dollars of weaponry to that nation. U.S. Green Berets provided
training for the Indonesia’s elite force which was responsible for
many of atrocities in East Timor. (3)

Iran

Iran
lost about 262,000 people in the war against Iraq from 1980 to 1988.
(1) See Iraq for more information about that war.

On
July 3, 1988 the U.S. Navy ship, the Vincennes, was operating withing
Iranian waters providing military support for Iraq during the
Iran-Iraq war. During a battle against Iranian gunboats it fired two
missiles at an Iranian Airbus, which was on a routine civilian
flight. All 290 civilian on board were killed. (2,3)

Iraq

A.
The Iraq-Iran War lasted from 1980 to 1988 and during that time there
were about 105,000 Iraqi deaths according to the Washington Post.
(1,2)

According
to Howard Teicher, a former National Security Council official, the
U.S. provided the Iraqis with billions of dollars in credits and
helped Iraq in other ways such as making sure that Iraq had military
equipment including biological agents This surge of help for Iraq
came as Iran seemed to be winning the war and was close to Basra. (1)
The U.S. was not adverse to both countries weakening themselves as a
result of the war, but it did not appear to want either side to win.

B:
The U.S.-Iraq War and the Sanctions Against Iraq extended from 1990
to 2003.

Iraq
invaded Kuwait on August 2, 1990 and the U.S. responded by demanding
that Iraq withdraw, and four days later the U.N. levied international
sanctions.

Iraq
had reason to believe that the U.S. would not object to its invasion
of Kuwait, since U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, April Glaspie, had told
Saddam Hussein that the U.S. had no position on the dispute that his
country had with Kuwait. So the green light was given, but it seemed
to be more of a trap.

As
a part of the public relations strategy to energize the American
public into supporting an attack against Iraq the daughter of the
Kuwaiti ambassador to the U.S. falsely testified before Congress that
Iraqi troops were pulling the plugs on incubators in Iraqi hospitals.
(1) This contributed to a war frenzy in the U.S.

The
U.S. air assault started on January 17, 1991 and it lasted for 42
days. On February 23 President H.W. Bush ordered the U.S. ground
assault to begin. The invasion took place with much needless killing
of Iraqi military personnel. Only about 150 American military
personnel died compared to about 200,000 Iraqis. Some of the Iraqis
were mercilessly killed on the Highway of Death and about 400 tons of
depleted uranium were left in that nation by the U.S. (2,3)

Other
deaths later were from delayed deaths due to wounds, civilians
killed, those killed by effects of damage of the Iraqi water
treatment facilities and other aspects of its damaged infrastructure
and by the sanctions.

In
1995 the Food and Agriculture Organization of the U.N. reported that
U.N sanctions against on Iraq had been responsible for the deaths of
more than 560,000 children since 1990. (5)

Leslie
Stahl on the TV Program 60 Minutes in 1996 mentioned to Madeleine
Albright, U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. “We have heard that a half
million children have died. I mean, that’s more children than died
in Hiroshima. And – and you know, is the price worth it?”
Albright replied “I think this is a very hard choice, but the price
– we think is worth it.” (4)

In
1999 UNICEF reported that 5,000 children died each month as a result
of the sanction and the War with the U.S. (6)

Richard
Garfield later estimated that the more likely number of excess deaths
among children under five years of age from 1990 through March 1998
to be 227,000 – double those of the previous decade. Garfield
estimated that the numbers to be 350,000 through 2000 (based in part
on result of another study). (7)

However,
there are limitations to his study. His figures were not updated for
the remaining three years of the sanctions. Also, two other somewhat
vulnerable age groups were not studied: young children above the age
of five and the elderly.

All
of these reports were considerable indicators of massive numbers of
deaths which the U.S. was aware of and which was a part of its
strategy to cause enough pain and terror among Iraqis to cause them
to revolt against their government.

C:
Iraq-U.S. War started in 2003 and has not been concluded


Just
as the end of the Cold War emboldened the U.S. to attack Iraq in 1991
so the attacks of September 11, 2001 laid the groundwork for the U.S.
to launch the current war against Iraq. While in some other wars we
learned much later about the lies that were used to deceive us, some
of the deceptions that were used to get us into this war became known
almost as soon as they were uttered. There were no weapons of mass
destruction, we were not trying to promote democracy, we were not
trying to save the Iraqi people from a dictator.

The
total number of Iraqi deaths that are a result of our current Iraq
against Iraq War is 654,000, of which 600,000 are attributed to acts
of violence, according to Johns Hopkins researchers. (1,2)

Since
these deaths are a result of the U.S. invasion, our leaders must
accept responsibility for them.

Israeli-Palestinian
War

About
100,000 to 200,000 Israelis and Palestinians, but mostly the latter,
have been killed in the struggle between those two groups. The U.S.
has been a strong supporter of Israel, providing billions of dollars
in aid and supporting its possession of nuclear weapons. (1,2)


Korea,
North and South


The
Korean War started in 1950 when, according to the Truman
administration, North Korea invaded South Korea on June 25th.
However, since then another explanation has emerged which maintains
that the attack by North Korea came during a time of many border
incursions by both sides. South Korea initiated most of the border
clashes with North Korea beginning in 1948. The North Korea
government claimed that by 1949 the South Korean army committed 2,617
armed incursions. It was a myth that the Soviet Union ordered North
Korea to attack South Korea. (1,2)


The
U.S. started its attack before a U.N. resolution was passed
supporting our nation’s intervention, and our military forces added
to the mayhem in the war by introducing the use of napalm. (1)

During
the war the bulk of the deaths were South Koreans, North Koreans and
Chinese. Four sources give deaths counts ranging from 1.8 to 4.5
million. (3,4,5,6) Another source gives a total of 4 million but does
not identify to which nation they belonged. (7)


John
H. Kim, a U.S. Army veteran and the Chair of the Korea Committee of
Veterans for Peace, stated in an article that during the Korean War
“the U.S. Army, Air Force and Navy were directly involved in the
killing of about three million civilians – both South and North
Koreans – at many locations throughout Korea…It is reported that
the U.S. dropped some 650,000 tons of bombs, including 43,000 tons of
napalm bombs, during the Korean War.” It is presumed that this
total does not include Chinese casualties.

Another
source states a total of about 500,000 who were Koreans and
presumably only military. (8,9)


Laos


From
1965 to 1973 during the Vietnam War the U.S. dropped over two million
tons of bombs on Laos – more than was dropped in WWII by both
sides. Over a quarter of the population became refugees. This was
later called a “secret war,” since it occurred at the same time
as the Vietnam War, but got little press. Hundreds of thousands were
killed. Branfman make the only estimate that I am aware of , stating
that hundreds of thousands died. This can be interpeted to mean that
at least 200,000 died. (1,2,3)


U.S.
military intervention in Laos actually began much earlier. A civil
war started in the 1950s when the U.S. recruited a force of 40,000
Laotians to oppose the Pathet Lao, a leftist political party that
ultimately took power in 1975.

Also
See Vietnam

Nepal


Between
8,000 and 12,000 Nepalese have died since a civil war broke out in
1996. The death rate, according to Foreign Policy in Focus, sharply
increased with the arrival of almost 8,400 American M-16 submachine
guns (950 rpm) and U.S. advisers. Nepal is 85 percent rural and badly
in need of land reform. Not surprisingly 42 % of its people live
below the poverty level. (1,2)

In
2002, after another civil war erupted, President George W. Bush
pushed a bill through Congress authorizing $20 million in military
aid to the Nepalese government. (3)


Nicaragua


In
1981 the Sandinistas overthrew the Somoza government in Nicaragua,
(1) and until 1990 about 25,000 Nicaraguans were killed in an armed
struggle between the Sandinista government and Contra rebels who were
formed from the remnants of Somoza’s national government. The use
of assassination manuals by the Contras surfaced in 1984. (2,3)


The
U.S. supported the victorious government regime by providing covert
military aid to the Contras (anti-communist guerillas) starting in
November, 1981. But when Congress discovered that the CIA had
supervised acts of sabotage in Nicaragua without notifying Congress,
it passed the Boland Amendment in 1983 which prohibited the CIA,
Defense Department and any other government agency from providing any
further covert military assistance. (4)


But
ways were found to get around this prohibition. The National Security
Council, which was not explicitly covered by the law, raised private
and foreign funds for the Contras. In addition, arms were sold to
Iran and the proceeds were diverted from those sales to the Contras
engaged in the insurgency against the Sandinista government. (5)
Finally, the Sandinistas were voted out of office in 1990 by voters
who thought that a change in leadership would placate the U.S., which
was causing misery to Nicaragua’s citizenry by it support of the
Contras.


Pakistan


In
1971 West Pakistan, an authoritarian state supported by the U.S.,
brutally invaded East Pakistan. The war ended after India, whose
economy was staggering after admitting about 10 million refugees,
invaded East Pakistan (now Bangladesh) and defeated the West
Pakistani forces. (1)

Millions
of people died during that brutal struggle, referred to by some as
genocide committed by West Pakistan. That country had long been an
ally of the U.S., starting with $411 million provided to establish
its armed forces which spent 80% of its budget on its military. $15
million in arms flowed into W. Pakistan during the war. (2,3,4)

Three
sources estimate that 3 million people died and (5,2,6) one source
estimates 1.5 million. (3)


Panama


In
December, 1989 U.S. troops invaded Panama, ostensibly to arrest
Manuel Noriega, that nation’s president. This was an example of the
U.S. view that it is the master of the world and can arrest anyone it
wants to. For a number of years before that he had worked for the
CIA, but fell out of favor partially because he was not an opponent
of the Sandinistas in Nicaragua. (1) It has been estimated that
between 500 and 4,000 people died. (2,3,4)


Paraguay:
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines


The
Philippines were under the control of the U.S. for over a hundred
years. In about the last 50 to 60 years the U.S. has funded and
otherwise helped various Philippine governments which sought to
suppress the activities of groups working for the welfare of its
people. In 1969 the Symington Committee in the U.S. Congress revealed
how war material was sent there for a counter-insurgency campaign.
U.S. Special Forces and Marines were active in some combat
operations. The estimated number of persons that were executed and
disappeared under President Fernando Marcos was over 100,000. (1,2)


South
America: Operation Condor


This
was a joint operation of 6 despotic South American governments
(Argentina, Bolivia, Brazil, Chile, Paraguay and Uruguay) to share
information about their political opponents. An estimated 13,000
people were killed under this plan. (1)


It
was established on November 25, 1975 in Chile by an act of the
Interamerican Reunion on Military Intelligence. According to U.S.
embassy political officer, John Tipton, the CIA and the Chilean
Secret Police were working together, although the CIA did not set up
the operation to make this collaboration work. Reportedly, it ended
in 1983. (2)


On
March 6, 2001 the New York Times reported the existence of a recently
declassified State Department document revealing that the United
States facilitated communications for Operation Condor. (3)


Sudan


Since
1955, when it gained its independence, Sudan has been involved most
of the time in a civil war. Until about 2003 approximately 2 million
people had been killed. It not known if the death toll in Darfur is
part of that total.


Human
rights groups have complained that U.S. policies have helped to
prolong the Sudanese civil war by supporting efforts to overthrow the
central government in Khartoum. In 1999 U.S. Secretary of State
Madeleine Albright met with the leader of the Sudan People’s
Liberation Army (SPLA) who said that she offered him food supplies if
he would reject a peace plan sponsored by Egypt and Libya.

In
1978 the vastness of Sudan’s oil reservers was discovered and
within two years it became the sixth largest recipient of U.S,
military aid. It’s reasonable to assume that if the U.S. aid a
government to come to power it will feel obligated to give the U.S.
part of the oil pie.


A
British group, Christian Aid, has accused foreign oil companies of
complicity in the depopulation of villages. These companies – not
American – receive government protection and in turn allow the
government use of its airstrips and roads.


In
August 1998 the U.S. bombed Khartoum, Sudan with 75 cruise míssiles.
Our government said that the target was a chemical weapons factory
owned by Osama bin Laden. Actually, bin Laden was no longer the
owner, and the plant had been the sole supplier of pharmaceutical
supplies for that poor nation. As a result of the bombing tens of
thousands may have died because of the lack of medicines to treat
malaria, tuberculosis and other diseases. The U.S. settled a lawsuit
filed by the factory’s owner. (1,2)


Uruguay:
See South America: Operation Condor

Vietnam

In
Vietnam, under an agreement several decades ago, there was supposed
to be an election for a unified North and South Vietnam. The U.S.
opposed this and supported the Diem government in South Vietnam. In
August, 1964 the CIA and others helped fabricate a phony Vietnamese
attack on a U.S. ship in the Gulf of Tonkin and this was used as a
pretext for greater U.S. involvement in Vietnam. (1)


During
that war an American assassination operation,called Operation
Phoenix, terrorized the South 

Vietnamese people, and during the war
American troops were responsible in 1968 for the mass slaughter of
the people in the village of My Lai.


According
to a Vietnamese government statement in 1995 the number of deaths of
civilians and military personnel during the Vietnam War was 5.1
million. (2)


Since
deaths in Cambodia and Laos were about 2.7 million (See Cambodia and
Laos) the estimated total for the Vietnam War is 7.8 million.


The
Virtual Truth Commission provides a total for the war of 5 million,
(3) and Robert McNamara, former Secretary Defense, according to the
New York Times Magazine says that the number of Vietnamese dead is
3.4 million. (4,5)


Yugoslavia


Yugoslavia
was a socialist federation of several republics. Since it refused to
be closely tied to the Soviet Union during the Cold War, it gained
some suport from the U.S. But when the Soviet Union dissolved,
Yugoslavia’s usefulness to the U.S. ended, and the U.S and Germany
worked to convert its socialist economy to a capitalist one by a
process primarily of dividing and conquering. There were ethnic and
religious differences between various parts of Yugoslavia which were
manipulated by the U.S. to cause several wars which resulted in the
dissolution of that country.


From
the early 1990s until now Yugoslavia split into several independent
nations whose lowered income, along with CIA connivance, has made it
a pawn in the hands of capitalist countries. (1) The dissolution of
Yugoslavia was caused primarily by the U.S. (2)


Here
are estimates of some, if not all, of the internal wars in
Yugoslavia. All wars: 107,000; (3,4)

Bosnia
and Krajina: 250,000; (5) Bosnia: 20,000 to 30,000; (5) Croatia:
15,000; (6) and

Kosovo:
500 to 5,000. (7)


NOTES


Afghanistan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.135.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_
terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Soviet
War in
Afghanistan
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.76

5.U.S
Involvement in Afghanistan,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in
Afghanistan)

6.The
CIA’s Intervention in Afghanistan, Interview with Zbigniew
Brzezinski, Le Nouvel Observateur, Paris, 15-21 January 1998, Posted
at globalresearch.ca 15 October
2001, 
http://www.globalresearch.ca/articles/BRZ110A.html

7.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.5

8.Unknown
News, 
http://www.unknownnews.net/casualtiesw.html

Angola

1.Howard
W. French “From Old Files, a New Story of the U.S. Role in the
Angolan War” New York Times 3/31/02

2.Angolan
Update, American Friends Service Committee FS, 11/1/99 flyer.

3.Norman
Solomon, War Made Easy, (John Wiley & Sons, 2005) p. 82-83.

4.Lance
Selfa, U.S. Imperialism, A Century of Slaughter, International
Socialist Review Issue 7, Spring 1999 (as appears in Third world
Traveler www.
thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Century_Imperialism.html)

5.
Jeffress Ramsay, Africa , (Dushkin/McGraw Hill Guilford Connecticut),
1997, p. 144-145.

6.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.54.

Argentina
: See South America: Operation Condor

Bolivia

1.
Phil Gunson, Guardian, 5/6/02,
http://www.guardian.co.uk/archive
/article/0,4273,41-07884,00.html

2.Jerry
Meldon, Return of Bolilvia’s Drug – Stained Dictator,
Consortium,
www.consortiumnews.com/archives/story40.html.

Brazil
See South America: Operation Condor

Cambodia

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/ .

2.David
Model, President Richard Nixon, Henry Kissinger, and the Bombing of
Cambodia excerpted from the book Lying for Empire How to Commit War
Crimes With A Straight Face, Common Courage Press, 2005,
paper
http://thirdworldtraveler.com/American_Empire/Nixon_Cambodia_LFE.html.

3.Noam
Chomsky, Chomsky on Cambodia under Pol Pot,
etc.,
http//zmag.org/forums/chomcambodforum.htm.

Chad

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
151-152 .

2.Richard
Keeble, Crimes Against Humanity in Chad, Znet/Activism
12/4/06
http://www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=11560&sectionID=1).

Chile

1.Parenti,
Michael, The Sword and the Dollar (New York, St. Martin’s Press,
1989) p. 56.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
142-143.

3.Moreorless:
Heroes and Killers of the 20th Century, Augusto Pinochet Ugarte,

http://www.moreorless.au.com/killers/pinochet.html

4.Associated
Press,Pincohet on 91st Birthday, Takes Responsibility for Regimes’s
Abuses, Dayton Daily News 11/26/06

5.Chalmers
Johnson, Blowback, The Costs and Consequences of American Empire (New
York: Henry Holt and Company, 2000), p. 18.

China:
See Korea

Colombia

1.Chronology
of American State Terrorism, p.2

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html).

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
163.

3.Millions
Killed by Imperialism Washington Post May 6,
2002)
http://www.etext.org./Politics/MIM/rail/impkills.html

4.Gabriella
Gamini, CIA Set Up Death Squads in Colombia Times Newspapers Limited,
Dec. 5,
1996,
www.edu/CommunicationsStudies/ben/news/cia/961205.death.html).

5.Virtual
Truth Commission, 1991

Human
Rights Watch Report: Colombia’s Killer Networks–The
Military-Paramilitary Partnership).

Cuba

1.St.
James Encyclopedia of Popular Culture – on Bay of Pigs
Invasion
http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion.

2.Wikipedia http://bookrags.com/Bay_of_Pigs_Invasion#Casualties.

Democratic
Republic of Congo (Formerly Zaire)

1.F.
Jeffress Ramsey, Africa (Guilford Connecticut, 1997), p. 85

2.
Anup Shaw The Democratic Republic of Congo,
10/31/2003)
http://www.globalissues.org/Geopolitics/Africa/DRC.asp)

3.Kevin
Whitelaw, A Killing in Congo, U. S. News and World
Report
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/doubleissue/mysteries/patrice.htm

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p
158-159.

5.Ibid.,p.
260

6.Ibid.,p.
259

7.Ibid.,p.262

8.David
Pickering, “World War in Africa,
6/26/02,
www.9-11peace.org/bulletin.php3

9.William
D. Hartung and Bridget Moix, Deadly Legacy; U.S. Arms to Africa and
the Congo War, Arms Trade Resource Center, January ,
2000
www.worldpolicy.org/projects/arms/reports/congo.htm


Dominican
Republic

1.Norman
Solomon, (untitled) Baltimore Sun April 26,
2005
http://www.globalpolicy.org/empire/history/2005/0426spincycle.htm
Intervention
Spin Cycle

2.Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Power_Pack

3.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
175.

4.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.26-27.


East
Timor

1.Virtual
Truth Commission,
 http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/date4.htm

2.Matthew
Jardine, Unraveling Indonesia, Nonviolent Activist, 1997)

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

4.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p.
197.

5.US
trained butchers of Timor, The Guardian, London. Cited by The Drudge
Report, September 19,
1999. 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/indon.htm


El
Salvador

1.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003, (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 152-153.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.
54-55.

3.El
Salvador,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Salvador#The_20th_century_and_beyond)

4.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.


Grenada

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p. 66-67.

2.Stephen
Zunes, The U.S. Invasion of
Grenada,
http://wwwfpif.org/papers/grenada2003.html .


Guatemala

1.Virtual
Truth Commissiion 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

2.Ibid.

3.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.2-13.

4.Robert
T. Buckman, Latin America 2003 (Stryker-Post Publications Baltimore
2003) p. 162.

5.Douglas
Farah, Papers Show U.S. Role in Guatemalan Abuses, Washington Post
Foreign Service, March 11, 1999, A 26


Haiti

1.Francois
Duvalier,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fran%C3%A7ois_Duvalier#Reign_of_terror).

2.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p 87.

3.William
Blum, Haiti 1986-1994: Who Will Rid Me of This Turbulent
Priest,
http://www.doublestandards.org/blum8.html


Honduras

1.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p. 55.

2.Reports
by Country: Honduras, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/honduras.htm

3.James
A. Lucas, Torture Gets The Silence Treatment, Countercurrents, July
26, 2004.

4.Gary
Cohn and Ginger Thompson, Unearthed: Fatal Secrets, Baltimore Sun,
reprint of a series that appeared June 11-18, 1995 in Jack
Nelson-Pallmeyer, School of Assassins, p. 46 Orbis Books 2001.

5.Michael
Dobbs, Negroponte’s Time in Honduras at Issue, Washington Post,
March 21, 2005


Hungary

1.Edited
by Malcolm Byrne, The 1956 Hungarian Revoluiton: A history in
Documents November 4,
2002
http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB76/index2.htm

2.Wikipedia
The Free
Encyclopedia,
http://www.answers.com/topic/hungarian-revolution-of-1956


Indonesia

1.Virtual
Truth Commission 
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Editorial,
Indonesia’s Killers, The Nation, March 30, 1998.

3.Matthew
Jardine, Indonesia Unraveling, Non Violent Activist Sept–Oct, 1997
(Amnesty) 2/7/07.

4.Sison,
Jose Maria, Reflections on the 1965 Massacre in Indonesia, p.
5.
http://qc.indymedia.org/mail.php?id=5602;

5.Annie
Pohlman, Women and the Indonesian Killings of 1965-1966: Gender
Variables and Possible Direction for Research,
p.4,
http://coombs.anu.edu.au/SpecialProj/ASAA/biennial-conference/2004/Pohlman-A-ASAA.pdf

6.Peter
Dale Scott, The United States and the Overthrow of Sukarno,
1965-1967, Pacific Affairs, 58, Summer 1985, pages
239-264.
http://www.namebase.org/scott.

7.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.30.


Iran

1.Geoff
Simons, Iraq from Sumer to Saddam, 1996, St. Martins Press, NY p.
317.

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

3.BBC
1988: US Warship Shoots Down Iranian
Airliner
http://news.bbc.co.uk/onthisday/default.stm )


Iraq

Iran-Iraq
War

1.Michael
Dobbs, U.S. Had Key role in Iraq Buildup, Washington Post December
30, 2002, p
A01 
http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A52241-2002Dec29?language=printer

2.Global
Security.Org , Iran Iraq War
(1980-1980)
globalsecurity.org/military/world/war/iran-iraq.htm.


U.S.
Iraq War and Sanctions

1.Ramsey
Clark, The Fire This Time (New York, Thunder’s Mouth), 1994,
p.31-32

2.Ibid.,
p. 52-54

3.Ibid.,
p. 43

4.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, (South End Press Cambridge MA 2000). p.
175.

5.Food
and Agricultural Organizaiton, The Children are Dying, 1995 World
View Forum, Internationa Action Center, International Relief
Association, p. 78

6.Anthony
Arnove, Iraq Under Siege, South End Press Cambridge MA 2000. p. 61.

7.David
Cortright, A Hard Look at Iraq Sanctions December 3, 2001, The
Nation.


U.S-Iraq
War 2003-?

1.Jonathan
Bor 654,000 Deaths Tied to Iraq War Baltimore Sun , October 11,2006

2.News http://www.unknownnews.net/casualties.html


Israeli-Palestinian
War

1.Post-1967
Palestinian & Israeli Deaths from Occupation & Violence May
16,
2006 
http://globalavoidablemortality.blogspot.com/2006/05/post-1967-palestinian-israeli-deaths.html)

2.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html


Korea

1.James
I. Matray Revisiting Korea: Exposing Myths of the Forgotten War,
Korean War Teachers Conference: The Korean War, February 9,
2001
http://www.truman/library.org/Korea/matray1.htm

2.William
Blum, Killing Hope (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 1995), p. 46

3.Kanako
Tokuno, Chinese Winter Offensive in Korean War – the Debacle of
American Strategy, ICE Case Studies Number 186, May,
2006
http://www.american.edu/ted/ice/chosin.htm.

4.John
G. Stroessinger, Why Nations go to War, (New York; St. Martin’s
Press), p. 99)

5.Britannica
Concise Encyclopedia, as reported in
Answers.com
http://www.answers.com/topic/Korean-war

6.Exploring
the Environment: Korean
Enigma
www.cet.edu/ete/modules/korea/kwar.html)

7.S.
Brian Wilson, Who are the Real Terrorists? Virtual Truth
Commisson
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

8.Korean
War Casualty Statistics 
www.century
china.com/history/krwarcost.html
)

9.S.
Brian Wilson, Documenting U.S. War Crimes in North Korea (Veterans
for Peace Newsletter) Spring, 2002) 
http://www.veteransforpeace.org/


Laos

1.William
Blum Rogue State (Maine, Common Cause Press) p. 136

2.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html

3.Fred
Branfman, War Crimes in Indochina and our Troubled National Soul

www.wagingpeace.org/articles/2004/08/00_branfman_us-warcrimes-indochina.htm).


Nepal

1.Conn
Hallinan, Nepal & the Bush Administration: Into Thin Air,
February 3, 2004

fpif.org/commentary/2004/0402nepal.html.

2.Human
Rights Watch, Nepal’s Civil War: the Conflict Resumes, March 2006 )

http://hrw.org/english/docs/2006/03/28/nepal13078.htm.

3.Wayne
Madsen, Possible CIA Hand in the Murder of the Nepal Royal Family,
India Independent Media Center, September 25,
2001
http://india.indymedia.org/en/2002/09/2190.shtml.


Nicaragua

1.Virtual
Truth Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/.

2.Timeline
Nicaragua
www.stanford.edu/group/arts/nicaragua/discovery_eng/timeline/).

3.Chronology
of American State
Terrorism,
http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/ChronologyofTerror.html.

4.William
Blum, Nicaragua 1981-1990 Destabilization in Slow Motion

www.thirdworldtraveler.com/Blum/Nicaragua_KH.html.

5.Wikipedia,
the Free
Encyclopedia,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran-Contra_Affair.


Pakistan

1.John
G. Stoessinger, Why Nations Go to War, (New York: St. Martin’s
Press), 1974 pp 157-172.

2.Asad
Ismi, A U.S. – Financed Military Dictatorship, The CCPA Monitor,
June 2002, Canadian Centre for Policy
Alternatives 
http://www.policyaltematives.ca)www.ckln.fm/~asadismi/pakistan.html

3.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003),
p.123, 124.

4.Arjum
Niaz ,When America Look the Other Way by,

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=2821&sectionID=1

5.Leo
Kuper, Genocide (Yale University Press, 1981), p. 79.

6.Bangladesh
Liberation War , Wikipedia, the Free
Encyclopedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bangladesh_Liberation_War#USA_and_USSR)


Panama

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’s Greatest Hits, (Odonian Press 1998) p. 83.

2.William
Blum, Rogue State (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2000), p.154.

3.U.S.
Military Charged with Mass Murder, The Winds
9/96,
www.apfn.org/thewinds/archive/war/a102896b.html

4.Mark
Zepezauer, CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage
Press, 1994), p.83.

Paraguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Philippines

1.Romeo
T. Capulong, A Century of Crimes Against the Filipino People,
Presentation, Public Interest Law Center, World Tribunal for Iraq
Trial in New York City on August
25,2004.
http://www.peoplejudgebush.org/files/RomeoCapulong.pdf).

2.Roland
B. Simbulan The CIA in Manila – Covert Operations and the CIA’s
Hidden Hisotry in the Philippines Equipo Nizkor Information –
Derechos, derechos.org/nizkor/filipinas/doc/cia.


South
America: Operation Condor

1.John
Dinges, Pulling Back the Veil on Condor, The Nation, July 24, 2000.

2.Virtual
Truth Commission, Telling the Truth for a Better
America
www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/condor.htm)

3.Operation
Condor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Condor#US_involvement).


Sudan

1.Mark
Zepezauer, Boomerang, (Monroe, Maine: Common Courage Press, 2003), p.
30, 32,34,36.

2.The
Black Commentator, Africa Action The Tale of Two Genocides: The
Failed US Response to Rwanda and Darfur, 11 August
2006
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/091706X.shtml.


Uruguay
See South America: Operation Condor


Vietnam

1.Mark
Zepezauer, The CIA’S Greatest Hits (Monroe, Maine:Common Courage
Press,1994), p 24

2.Casualties
– US vs NVA/VC,
http://www.rjsmith.com/kia_tbl.html.

3.Brian
Wilson, Virtual Truth
Commission
http://www.geocities.com/~virtualtruth/

4.Fred
Branfman, U.S. War Crimes in Indochiona and our Duty to Truth August
26, 2004

www.zmag.org/content/print_article.cfm?itemID=6105&sectionID=1

5.David
K Shipler, Robert McNamara and the Ghosts of
Vietnam
nytimes.com/library/world/asia/081097vietnam-mcnamara.html


Yugoslavia

1.Sara
Flounders, Bosnia Tragedy:The Unknown Role of the Pentagon in NATO in
the Balkans (New York: International Action Center) p. 47-75

2.James
A. Lucas, Media Disinformation on the War in Yugoslavia: The Dayton
Peace Accords Revisited, Global Research, September 7, 2005
http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=
viewArticle&code=LUC20050907&articleId=899

3.Yugoslav
Wars in 1990s
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yugoslav_wars.

4.George
Kenney, The Bosnia Calculation: How Many Have Died? Not nearly as
many as some would have you think., NY Times Magazine, April 23, 1995

http://www.balkan-archive.org.yu/politics/
war_crimes/srebrenica/bosnia_numbers.html
)

5.Chronology
of American State Terrorism

http://www.intellnet.org/resources/american_terrorism/
ChronologyofTerror.html.

6.Croatian
War of Independence,
Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Croatian_War_of_Independence

7.Human
Rights Watch, New Figures on Civilian Deaths in Kosovo War, (February
7, 2000) 
http://www.hrw.org/press/2000/02/nato207.htm.

Related Posts:

https://www.popularresistance.org/us-has-killed-more-than-20-million-in-37-nations-since-wwii/

Jammer dat Oekraïne en Syrie niet werden genoemd in de lijst, bovendien is er nog een groot aantal landen waar de VS tekeer is gegaan, o.a. middels illegale geheime operaties van speciale VS moordcommando’s…….

Zie ook:

VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

List of wars involving the United States

VS: openlijke militaire oefening met terreurgroep in Syrië……

Bang voor Amerika

NAVO gaat VS helpen in Zuid-Amerika terreur uit te oefenen: Colombia lid van de NAVO………

VS commando’s vechten o.a. in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika, aldus het VS ministerie van oorlog………

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……‘ (bericht van 5 oktober 2018)

Voor meer berichten n.a.v. het bovenstaande, klik op één van de labels, die u onder dit bericht aantreft. Helaas kan ik daar maar 140 tekens kwijt en kan dus niet eens alle landen opnemen, die hier werden genoemd (het label illegale oorlog’ duidt op de illegale oorlog tegen Irak).

Na kritiek de tekst in de kop aangepast op 24 november 2016. (toegevoegd: sinds ‘het einde van‘ WOII……..)