White Helmets worden als helden afgeschilderd in propaganda spel

‘Call of
Duty: Modern Warfare’, een ‘videospel’ over oorlogsvoering heeft een nieuwe aflevering, waarin o.a ‘het heroïsche werk’ van de White Helmets wordt weergegeven, een
nieuwe poging om Assad en zijn regering te demoniseren, niet voor
niets ook dat GB onlangs poogde een gifgasaanval in de schoenen van
Assad te schuiven, de zoveelste poging wel te verstaan……

De schrijver van dit spel, Taylor Kurosaki heeft zijn best gedaan om de White Helmets te portretteren
als een organisatie die goed werk verricht in Syrië en is bedoeld om nog meer
steun te genereren voor deze organisatie….. 

De White Helmets, een organisatie die in werkelijkheid overduidelijk is gerelateerd aan terreurgroepen, groepen die het westen
afschildert als gematigde rebellen, terwijl
het moordende, verkrachtende en martelende psychopaten zijn, die bovendien met medeweten van het westen over gifgassen als chlorine en sarin beschikken…… Psychopaten die o.a. met Nederlands belastinggeld van jou en mij werden gesteund……

De White Helmets zijn meermaals betrapt in het bijstaan van de zogenaamde gematigde rebellen en het zelf uitoefenen van terreur……..

De White Helmets werd door een Britse ex-officier en particuliere
‘militaire aannemer’ op poten gezet. Deze figuur, James Le Mesurier,
wilde daarmee het debat over Syrië sturen in de richting van het
afzetten van Assad. ‘Missie geslaagd’, grootschalige terreur met als ‘offer’ meer dan 500.000 vermoorde Syriërs, echter het afzetten van
Assad wilde maar niet lukken…..

Lees het
volgende artikel van
Caitlin Johnstone en zie de begeleidende
video’s. Het artikel werd door mij overgenomen van
Anti-Media:

New
‘Call Of Duty’ Encourages Support for Syria’s White Helmets

June
5, 2019 at 8:49 pm

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — The official
trailer
 for
the latest 
Call
of Duty
 was
released a few days ago, and it features the Syria narrative
management operation known as the White Helmets depicted in heroic
roles. Characters wearing the organization’s signature headgear are
seen clearing rubble in 
part
of the trailer
 for Call
of Duty: Modern Warfare
.

To
give you an idea how popular the CoD franchise is, as of this writing
the official Youtube version of the trailer has 27 million views.

To
be clear, the characters in the game are most certainly intended to
resemble the White Helmets of Syria, and their presence there is most
certainly intended to increase support for and interest in that
group. How do I know? Its game writer has explicitly said so.

Kurosaki
says he wants ‘Call of Duty’ to be spoken of as on par with the
best war films, and he hopes ‘Modern Warfare’ will inspire fans
to check out the harrowing and eye-opening documentaries ‘The White
Helmets’ or ‘Last Man in Aleppo,” the 
LA
Times
 reports.

The
White Helmets are what legendary journalist John Pilger describes as
a
complete propaganda construct
“,
an operation designed by former British army officer and private
military contractor 
James Le
Mesurier
 to
manipulate the narrative about what’s going on in Syria. 
This
excellent half-hour mini-documentary
 by
James Corbett clearly outlines the way the operation is used to
create footage implicating the Assad government in the slaughter of
civilians via chemical weapons attacks and other camera-friendly war
crimes, the mountain of evidence of their ties to literal terrorist
organizations in Syria, and the western funding and media
manipulations that have been pouring into elevating the outfit.

It’s
a brilliant invention, really. Have a purportedly neutral group
filming on the ground in “rebel”-held areas (where the White
Helmets exclusively operate), and you can ensure an endless supply of
footage which can be used to paint a 
longtime
western target for regime change
 as
a barbarian who needs to be ousted. And indeed, the extremist
jihadist factions which overran Syria with 
the
backing
of the
US
 and its
allies
 nearly
succeeded in toppling Assad 
prior
to Russia’s intervention
,
and we may be certain that the agenda to control who rules over the
geostrategically crucial region remains as intact as ever.

The
pro-White Helmets propaganda is not 
Call
of Duty
‘s
first foray into US military narrative management. As 
noted
by journalist Max Blumenthal
 in
April, an earlier CoD game depicted the assassination of the leader
of Venezuela and, bizarrely, attacking Venezuela’s hydroelectric
dam and energy grid with the goal of causing power outages like the
ones the nation has been struggling with. Citing public information,
Blumenthal documents how such games have been “developed with
substantial input from America’s military intelligence apparatus”,
as well as the CoD designer’s involvement with the Pentagon and the
NATO narrative management firm the Atlantic Council.

People
playing these games, mostly impressionable young men, are manipulated
into desiring to accomplish the goals that are laid out for them in
order to win, all of which involve killing and many of which happen
to align with preexisting US military agendas. They are desensitized
to mass military violence, trained to support and identify with US
military campaigns, and taught that being a member of the military
might just be a fun and noble way to spend one’s future.

Propaganda
in video games doesn’t get the kind of pushback you see against
propaganda in news media and movies, largely because the content in
the games is generally only viewed individually by those who are
engrossed in playing them. It’s this whole closed-off world that is
manipulating minds with very little scrutiny compared to other forms
of media, which is troubling, because the video game industry is so
vast that for many years its earnings 
have
eclipsed those of the movie and music industries combined
.

This
needs more attention. The sane, healthy response to learning
that one’s government and its allies were arming and training
terrorist groups in Syria would have been screaming, earth-shaking
rage for months, accompanied by a demand for an unequivocal apology,
immediate repair of all damage done, and war crimes tribunals for
everyone who was involved. Instead, the news passed by with barely a
whisper, and now when you see Syria mentioned it’s generally to
condemn its president for fighting back against that unforgivably
depraved act of regime change interventionism. This has been
happening because people have been propagandized. Nothing will change
until we find a way to help human minds unplug from the 
narrative
control matrix
 and awaken
to what’s really going on
.

Opinion
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Medium / Report
a typo

==============================

* Zie o.a.: ‘MP Chris Williamson confronts UK government with apparent evidence of ‘staged’ chemical attack in Syria

De gifgasaanvallen die het reguliere Syrische leger zou hebben gepleegd, zijn onderdeel van ‘false flag’ operaties, ofwel men begaat een oorlogsmisdaad en schuift die de vijand in de schoenen, zie o.a.: ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

Zie ook:

White Helmets oprichter ‘vermoord door’ vredesactivisten en kritische alternatieve media‘ (voor meer berichten over de White Helemets, klik op de betreffende links in dat bericht)

Massamedia treuren over de dood van een door de CIA gesteunde terrorist

VS terreuraanslag in Syrië op 3 tankwagens: 4 doden

Gifgasaanval Douma in elkaar gezet door ‘gematigde rebellen’

Gifgasaanval Douma: OPCW rapport maakt korte metten met de westerse beschuldiging aan adres Syrië, waar de NOS een meer dan levensgrote bok schoot‘ (de OPCW heeft trouwens later een smerig spel gespeeld in de documentatie over deze zogenaamde gifgasaanval van Assad, dit door zaken weg te laten….)

VS heeft opstand en daarmee de oorlog in Syrië georganiseerd, zo toont WikiLeaks ten overvloede nog eens aan…….

Gifgasaanval Idlib: de komende ‘kindslachtoffers’ worden getraind door terreurgroep White Helmets………

Al Jazeera filmde een onderdeel van de ‘gifgasshow’ in Kahn Sheikhoun………..

Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!

Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering

VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

Voorbeeld BBC en AD propaganda inzake Idlib (Syrië)

John Bolton geeft terreurgroepen in Syrië de opdracht een false flag gifgasaanval uit te voeren

Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

Van Kappen (VVD) noemt ‘stapelaanwijzingen’ het bewijs en is blij met raketaanval VS op Syrische basis,  een aanval zonder enig echt bewijs voor Syrische schuld…….

Sico van der Meer (‘deskundige’ Clingendael) weet niet, dat Israël en Egypte grote hoeveelheden gifgas maken en op voorraad hebben……….

Koenders en SOHR melden gifgasaanval, reguliere media als NOS nemen bericht van SOHR (propaganda en ‘fake news’ orgaan) over

Rutte: raketaanval VS tegen Syrische basis was begrijpelijk en proportioneel, ook al is er geen bewijs voor Syrische schuld……..

Haley (VS ambassadeur bij VN) herhaalde in VN, voorafgaand aan raketaanval, het smerige spel van Powell in 2002, aanleiding tot illegale oorlog tegen Irak…….‘  

‘Koenders (PvdA BuZa): Assad is schuldig aan gifgasaanval en is een ‘criminele recidivist……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Esther de Lange (CDA): het afschieten door de VS van raketten op een Syrische basis ‘was even nodig………..’

VS bereid tot militair ingrijpen tegen de regering Assad >> aanleiding: gifgas leugens van o.a. de VS zelf…….‘ (zie de links in dat bericht over de levering van wapens door o.a.de VS (en Nederland) aan terreurgroepen als IS en al-Nusra)

Bernard Hammelburg (BNR): Assad is een monster waar we mee moeten samenwerken………

Van Baalen (VVD) het is moeilijk te zien wie je moet steunen: Al Qaida, Al Qaida of Al Qaida……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) laat weten hoe White Helmets vips rekruteren met Saoedisch geld….

Sophie in ‘t Veld (D66): het afschieten door de VS van raketten op een Syrische basis ‘was even nodig………..’

Genocidale aanval op sjiitische vluchtelingen uit Foua en Kefraya wordt door massamedia afgedaan als ‘een ongelukje’, of  volgens CNN zelfs als een ‘hiccup………

Exactly how the US trained and armed ISIS

Tulsi Gabbard (VS congres Hawaï): Trump is de beschermende Big Brother van Al Qaida

De sterkste beïnvloeding van de VS presidentsverkiezingen wordt als volkomen ‘legaal’ en normaal gezien

Caitlin
Johnstone heeft een perfect artikel gepubliceerd waarin ze de
flauwekul van Russische beïnvloeding van de presidentsverkiezingen
in 2016 nogmaals de grond in schrijft, tevens stelt Johnstone dat zelfs het
manipuleren van de zeer verouderde stemmachines in de VS niet op kan
tegen de enorme beïnvloeding van de verkiezingen door de reguliere
(massa-) media…….

Johnstone
wijst o.a. op WaPo ofwel op de Washington Post (in handen van één van de rijkste
personen ter wereld t.w. Jeff Bezos de oprichter, voorzitter en CEO
van Amazon) dat tijdens de democratische voorverkiezingen in 2016
binnen 16 uur tijd 16 artikelen publiceerde waarin Bernie Sanders (publiekelijk) werd besmeurd……..

Het
zal in aanloop van de presidentsverkiezingen in 2020 niet anders
zijn, sterker nog: nu al worden de democratische kandidaten al
besmeurd met valse aanklachten zoals o.a. op de Daily Beast……

Logisch
ook dat de reguliere media het hardst roepen om ingrijpen op de
sociale media (en het aanpakken van ‘Russische manipulaties’), daar
men op de sociale media, i.t.t. die reguliere media, wel een afgewogen beeld kan krijgen over wat er toe
doet in de wereld, uiteraard ook als het gaat om de presidentsverkiezingen in
de VS.

Wie
nog denkt dat de reguliere westerse media de waarheid brengen moet
wel volkomen blind en doof zijn, immers die media hebben intussen
kilometers aan bestanden die bomvol staan met ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws), neem alleen al de
berichtgeving in die media voorafgaand aan en tijdens de illegale oorlogen die
de VS met hulp van haar oorlogshond NAVO is begonnen, of het nu om
Afghanistan, Irak, Libië, Oekraïne of Syrië gaat……

Het voorgaande waar de genocide in Jemen amper de aandacht van de reguliere media kan trekken…..* Als die media aandacht besteden aan die genocide, worden
de Houthi rebellen keer op keer beschreven als Iraanse terroristen, terwijl deze
organisatie met succes IS en Al Qaida bestreed, de reden voor
ingrijpen door de soennitische terreurstaat Saoedi-Arabië…… De Houthi rebellen beschermen de sjiieten in Jemen, waar niemand anders deze kan bieden……

Lees
het volgende artikel van Johnstone, eerder gepubliceerd op de site van A Medium Corporation en door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media. Geeft het door
mensen, tijd dat de ogen van het grootste deel van de westerse
bevolkingen worden geopend voordat de volgende illegale oorlog wordt
aangegaan en voor verdere beïnvloeding van de verkiezingen door de
reguliere media en dat geldt ook voor ons land!! (zo werd de SP
gedemoniseerd in die media, dit voorafgaand aan de EU verkiezingen
vorige week, waar diezelfde media nu durven te stellen dat de SP
verkiezingscampagne is mislukt….)

The
Worst 2020 Election Interference Will Be Perfectly Legal

May
28, 2019 at 3:57 pm

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — “After
the Mueller report was released, our president called Vladimir Putin,
spent an hour on the phone with him,” Democratic presidential
candidate Beto O’Rourke 
said on
CBS’s 
Face
The Nation
 yesterday.
“Described the report as a hoax, giving Putin a green light to
further interfere in our democracy.”

Russia
interfered in the 2016 election,” 
tweeted presidential
candidate Kamala Harris the other day. “If we don’t do anything
to upgrade our election infrastructure, we will leave our nation
vulnerable to future attacks.”

We’ve
been seeing 
many
such hysterical warnings
 about
Russian interference in the upcoming 2020 elections, and as the
election gets nearer we are 100 percent guaranteed to see a lot more.

Roll Call

@rollcall

Lawmakers worry that elections will be held on woefully outdated voting machines and that any tampering by adversaries could lead to disputed results http://j.mp/2M2lopy 


6

2:40 AM – May 22, 2019

Americans may vote in 2020 using old, unsecured machines

Lawmakers and experts worry elections will be held on voting machines woefully outdated and that tampering by adversaries could lead to disputed results.

rollcall.com

Another
concern people have been voicing, which has far more legitimacy, is
the fear of election tampering from domestic actors. 
An
article
 published
the other day by 
Roll
Call
 reports
that experts are warning America’s 2020 elections “will be held
on voting machines that are woefully outdated and that any tampering
by adversaries could lead to disputed results.” An 
article
published last month
 by
the 
Guardian warns
that new voting machines aren’t necessarily an improvement.

The
purchases replace machines from the turn of the century that raise
serious security concerns,” the 
Guardian reports.
“But the same companies that made and sold those machines are
behind the new generation of technology, and a history of distrust
between election security advocates and voting machine vendors has
led to a bitter debate over the viability of the new voting
equipment — leaving some campaigners wondering if America’s
election system in 2020 might still be just as vulnerable to attack.”

Initiatives
are sprouting up to bring more election security and reliability to
the United States, which is currently 
ranked
dead last
 in
election integrity among all western democracies. Support for paper
ballots is picking up steam with 
support
from Senate Democrats
 and
multiple presidential candidates, and rightly so; hand-counted paper
ballots is considered 
the
gold standard
 for
election integrity, and every nation should want that for their
voting systems.

But
neither foreign interference nor domestic vote tampering will be the
most egregious form of election meddling that we will see in
America’s 2020 presidential elections.

Raza Ahmad Rumi

@Razarumi

Reminder: In 2016, Washington Post ran 16 negative stories about @SenSanders in 16 hours. Has to be a record of its kind. https://fair.org/home/washington-post-ran-16-negative-stories-on-bernie-sanders-in-16-hours/ @adamjohnsonNYC for @FAIRmediawatch


21

8:43 PM – Mar 4, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Negative stories on Bernie Sanders in the Washington Post

In what has to be some kind of record, the Washington Post ran 16 negative stories on Bernie Sanders in 16 hours, between roughly 10:20 PM EST Sunday, March 6, to 3:54 PM EST Monday, March 7—a window that includes the crucial Democratic debate in Flint, Michigan, and the next morning’s spin:

March
6, 10:20 PM: 
Bernie
Sanders Pledges the US Won’t Be No. 1 in Incarceration. He’ll
Need to Release Lots of Criminals

In
2016, at the single hottest and most contested moment of the
Democratic presidential primaries, the 
Washington
Post
 published
no less than sixteen smear pieces against Bernie Sanders 
in
the span of sixteen hours
.
This campaign by a newspaper which is solely owned by 
the
richest man in the world
 (who
also happens to be a 
CIA
contractor
 and Pentagon
advisory board member
)
was plainly geared at manipulating the 2016 presidential primary
results. And, along with similar campaigns by the rest of
the 
plutocrat-owned
media 
which
ranged from 
blacking
out coverage on Sanders
 to deliberately
manipulating narratives
 about
him to 
circulating
outright lies
,
it succeeded.

We
are already seeing this same pattern repeated today, arguably in an
even more egregious way. A recent article by Matt Taibbi for 
Rolling
Stone
 titled
We’ve
Hit a New Low in Campaign Hit Pieces

documents some jaw-droppingly obnoxious smears leveled against the
two Democratic candidates who are taking the most flack from the mass
media, Sanders and Tulsi Gabbard.

The Daily
Beast
 added
to the 
growing
mountain of MSM Gabbard smears
 with
an article titled “Tulsi Gabbard’s Campaign Is Being Boosted by
Putin Apologists”, claiming on essentially zero evidence that the
Hawaii congresswoman has a suspicious amount of support from Kremlin
loyalists, a smear which was elevated into mainstream consciousness
by ABC and CNN. Sanders was smeared by the 
New
York Times
 for
his previous opposition to US interventionism in Nicaragua.

We’re
not even halfway through 2019 and there are already far too many of
such mass media hit pieces for me to list in this article. These
plutocrat-owned outlets are doing everything they can to make sure
that Trump will be running against a more polite version of himself
come November 2020. Hell, 
Fortune
Magazine
 just
published an article titled “
Why
Joe Biden Is the Only True Progressive Candidate
”,
which attempts to argue exactly what the headline promises. Once the
primaries are over, this manipulation will shift toward whoever’s
the oligarchic favorite for the general election.

FORTUNE

@FortuneMagazine

Why Joe Biden is the only true progressive candidate http://bit.ly/2HOMHOS 


23

7:30 PM – May 24, 2019

Commentary: Why Joe Biden Is the Only True Progressive Candidate

The presidential candidate has been attacked by President Trump on the right and Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on the left. This only works in Biden’s favor.

fortune.com

As
soon as you see someone become extremely wealthy, you immediately see
them start buying up public narrative control. They buy and invest in
media outlets, they pour money into influential think tanks, they
send lobbyists into government offices to persuade politicians to
think a certain way about a given subject. Ordinary people can’t
afford to do these things, so they have relatively little control
over the dominant narratives about what’s going on in our society
and our world.

It
is therefore an indisputable fact that the very wealthy therefore
have an immensely disproportionate influence over the way that people
think and vote, which means the plutocratic class has the fully legal
ability to practice election interference. Both the plutocratic media
and the US government have already tacitly admitted that this is true
in the frantic, hysterical way they’ve been talking about Russian
Facebook memes as election interference, despite the fact that those
social media posts are a 
microscopic
drop in the barrel
 of
the 
billions
and billions of dollars
 that
goes into mass media election coverage. If the Internet Research
Agency of St Petersburg was election meddling, then the plutocratic
class which consistently manipulates public narratives to its favor
certainly is as well, to an extent that is greater by orders of
magnitude.

Of
course it’s good that people are pushing for paper ballots, and
it’s not a bad idea to take precautions against foreign
interference as well, but we must become aware that the greatest
share of election interference happens before anyone sets foot in a
polling booth. The way the American psyche is pummeled with mass
media narratives designed to 
manufacture
consent
 for
war, economic injustice, ecocide, Orwellian government intrusiveness,
and the politicians who promote these things will influence far more
votes in 2020 than any other election tampering, foreign or domestic.

Mass
media propaganda is the single most overlooked and under-appreciated
aspect of our society. The ability of an elite class to control the
way a supermajority of the population thinks, acts and votes has
shaped our entire world in the favor of a few sociopaths driven by an
insatiable lust for money and power who got to where they are because
they were willing to do anything to get ahead. If we can’t find a
way to get a handle on that, then it won’t matter how pristine your
elections are, how ethical the DNC primary process becomes, or what
the Russians are up to this year.

Do
you want to live in a world which is built around the selfish desires
of powerful, amoral manipulators and hoarders? No? Then you’re
going to have to start doing what you can to oppose such a system,
and to convince as many of your brothers and sisters as possible to
join you.

Support
Caitlin’s work on 
Patreon or Paypal.

Opinion
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Medium / Report
a typo

=======================================

* Immers je moet als mediaorgaan je best doen om de rol van de VS in die genocide te verzwijgen, daarnaast: als de Trump administratie het wil is de oorlog in Jemen morgen afgelopen……

Voor meer berichten over manipulatie van verkiezingen, klik op het label manipulatie, direct onder dit bericht. Let
wel: na een aantal berichten wordt het laatst gelezen bericht telkens
herhaald, dan onder dat laatst gelezen bericht even opnieuw op het label manipulatie klikken, enz. enz.

PS: nog steeds totaal belachelijk: de corrupte Palestijnenslachter Netanyahu sprak in 2016 het VS Congres toe, waar hij één grote reclame maakte voor Trump, een zaak die men blijkbaar niet ziet als beïnvloeding van de verkiezingen……..

Zie ook (later toegevoegd):

WaPo waarschuwt voor Russische digitale controle over de hersenen van VS burgers

Federale rechter stelt ten overvloede dat DNC geen grond heeft voor zaak te tegen Trumps verkiezingsteam

Geheime diensten in westen geven toe dat spioneren via het G5 netwerk praktisch onmogelijk is……..

Britse regering weigert RT en Sputnik voor conferentie over persvrijheid….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

1984 het boek van George Orwell: niet langer fictie…….

Het westen vervolgt journalist Assange, Rusland laat journalist vrij na onrust over diens gevangenschap‘ (zie daarin ook de links naar andere berichten over Assange)

Avaaz valt met fake news en desinformatie ‘fake news en desinformatie‘ aan……’ (zie in dat bericht ook de link naar een ander artikel met een smerige rol van Avaaz)

Rob Jetten (D66 fractievoorzitter) liegt een fikse slag in de rondte in EU verkiezingspraatje

EU verkiezingen: manipulatie ook door lobbyisme is misdadig, zelfs Bas Eickhout (GroenLinks) doet hieraan mee

‘Intel processors al 10 jaar zo lek als een mandje, Intel niet een bedrijf uit Rusland of China, maar uit….. de VS!

Gelekte documenten tonen aan dat Google en Pinterest censuur uitoefenen

Facebook stelt klimaatsceptisch Daily Caller aan als ‘factchecker…’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate: nog overtuigd van bestaan daarvan? Lees dit!‘ 

Robert Mueller lijdt aan dementie en maakt van Russiagate een nog belachelijker verhaal

Putin vraagt en Trump levert: een lijst met ‘alle goede zaken die Trump voor Rusland regelde’

Media wakker geschrokken en ontwaken in Assange nachtmerrie

Het is
bijna niet te geloven, de reguliere (massa-) media die zich meer dan 2 jaar richtten op
Russiagate en die Julian Assange keer op keer hebben besmeurd, zijn ontwaakt in de Assange nachtmerrie….. Eindelijk
begrijpt men in die media wat de arrestatie van en de beschuldigingen tegen Assange betekenen en zelfs de schoothondjes van de
plutocraten, degenen die talk shows doen, zijn bijzonder
verontwaardigd…. (de wonderen zijn toch de wereld nog niet uit!)

De beschuldigingen tegen Assange, waaraan nu zelfs spionage is toegevoegd, zijn een nieuwe stap van de VS naar een volledige politiestaat….. De vrijheid van nieuwsgaring wordt met de nieuwe beschuldigingen tegen Assange zwaar geweld aangedaan….. Reken maar dat de EU zelfde stappen zal nemen, mocht de VS doorgaan op dit heilloze pad, immers alles wat de VS doet wordt hier gezien als manna uit de hemel…….

Lees het
volgende artikel van Caitlin Johnstone, door mij overgenomen van
Anti-Media en laten we hopen dat de reguliere media het werk weer
gaan doen waarvoor ze ooit ontstaan zijn: onafhankelijke berichtgeving brengen in dienst van het volk en niet van de grote ondernemingen en een
spuugrijke elite……. Jammer genoeg zijn die media in handen van dezelfde plutocraten dan wel van investeringsgroepen, waar beide groepen zoveel mogelijk winst willen maken en geen kritiek dulden op het alom tegenwoordige ijskoude en inhumane neoliberalisme, of op het ophitsen van de VS en haar oorlogshond NAVO tot (illegale) oorlogsvoering, op zo groot mogelijke schaal, immers ook dat is goed voor de winsten…….

Professional
Assange Smearers Finally Realize His Fate Is Tied To Theirs

The
Media is Finally Realizing What the Prosecution of Assange Means for
Journalism

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor The Media is Finally Realizing What the Prosecution of Assange Means for Journalism

May
24, 2019 at 8:39 am

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — Rachel
Maddow has aired a segment condemning the 
new
indictment against Julian Assange
 for
17 alleged violations of the Espionage Act.

Yes, that Rachel
Maddow.

MSNBC’s
top host 
began
the segment
 after
it was
 introduced
by Chris Hayes
,
agreeing with her colleague that it’s surprising that more news
outlets aren’t giving this story more “wall to wall” coverage,
given its immense significance. She recapped Assange’s various
legal struggles up until this point, then accurately described
Assange’s new Espionage Act charges for publishing secret
documents.

And
these new charges are not about stealing classified information or
outsmarting computer systems in order to illegally obtain classified
information,” Maddow 
said.
“It’s not about that.

These
new charges are trying to prosecute Assange for publishing that
stolen, secret material which was obtained by somebody else. And that
is a whole different kettle of fish then what he was initially
charged with.”

By
charging Assange for publishing that stuff that was taken by Manning,
by issuing these charges today, the Justice Department has just done
something you might have otherwise thought was impossible,”
Maddow 
added after
explaining the unprecedented nature of this case.

The
Justice Department today, the Trump administration today, just put
every journalistic institution in this country on Julian Assange’s
side of the ledger. On his side of the fight. Which, I know, is
unimaginable. But that is because the government is now trying to
assert this brand new right to criminally prosecute people for
publishing secret stuff, and newspapers and magazines and
investigative journalists and all sorts of different entities publish
secret stuff all the time. That is the bread and butter of what we
do.”

Maddow carefully
explained
 to
her audience that these new charges have nothing at all to do with
the 2016 election or any of the Russiagate nonsense the MSNBC pundit
has been devoting her life to, correctly calling what the Trump
administration is doing with Assange “a novel legal effort to punch
a huge hole in the First Amendment.” She tied this in with Trump’s
common references to the mass media as the “enemy of the people”,
finally taking mainstream liberalism into a direct confrontation with
Trump’s 
actual war
on the press instead of nonsense about his tweeting mean things about
Jim Acosta. She rightly highlighted the dangers of allowing a
president with a thick authoritarian streak the ability to prosecute
journalists he doesn’t like, and discussed the possibility that the
UK may not comply with this new agenda in extradition proceedings.

I
think these 17 espionage charges against the WikiLeaks guy are a huge
deal, and a very dark development,” Maddow 
concluded.
“Chris Hayes this evening called it a ‘four alarm development’,
and I absolutely share that.”

And,
you know, I know you,” Maddow continued, pointing to the camera.
“Given everything else that we know about the WikiLeaks guy, I can
feel through the television right now your mixed feelings about what
I am saying. I can feel what may be, perhaps, a certain lack of
concern about Julian Assange’s ultimate fate, given his own gleeful
and extensive personal role in trying to help a hostile foreign
government interfere in our election in order to install their chosen
president with WikiLeaks’ help. Okay? I know. Okay, I feel ya. I
got it. But, it is a recurring theme in history, heck, it is a
recurring theme in the Bible, that they always pick the least
sympathetic figures to try this stuff on first. Despite anyone’s
feelings about this spectacularly unsympathetic character at the
center of this international drama, you are going to see every
journalistic institution in this country, every First Amendment
supporter in this country, left, right and center, swallow their
feelings about this particular human and denounce what the Trump
administration is trying to do here. Because it would fundamentally
change the United States of America.”

Wow.
Make no mistake, this is a hugely significant development. This isn’t
just some columnist for the 
New
York Times
 or
the 
Guardian,
this is Rachel effing Maddow, the Queen Mother of all tinfoil
pussyhat-wearing Russiagate insanity. This same pundit was just a
couple of months ago not just smearing but outright lying about
Assange, deceitfully 
telling
her audience
 that
the new legal rings closing around Assange were about his 2016
publications then instructing viewers not to Google anything about it
because they’ll get computer viruses. Now that she’s recognized
that this could actually hurt her and her network directly, she’s
finally feeding her audience a different narrative out of sheer
enlightened self-interest.

The
fact that such a hugely influential figure in mainstream liberal
media is now pushing back against Assange’s prosecution, and doing
so in a way that her mainstream liberal anti-Trump audience can
relate to, cannot be over-appreciated. Maddow’s credulous audience
would eat live kittens if she told them to, so the way she’s
pushing back against a dangerous legal precedent in language they can
understand will make a difference in the way American liberals think
about Assange’s predicament. It won’t make them like him, it
won’t make them value the things he’s done, but it will get them
to finally begin resisting something that badly needs to be resisted.
And that’s huge.

The
danger has always been that this fatal blow to journalism would be
meted out with total compliance and support from a population
hammered into docility by the ongoing narrative war which has been
waged on Assange’s and WikiLeaks’ reputations with the help of
the mass media.

There
was a very real danger that thought leaders like Maddow were going to
choose their feelings over reasoning when the foot finally fell and
the charges that criminalize journalism as “espionage” were
finally put into play. I don’t think anyone would have been
surprised if she’d applied that giant intellect of hers into making
it possible to ignore it without upsetting her audience and try and
figure it out later when it was too late and the legal precedent was
set. It would have been so easy to keep feeding into the dominant
“Assange is bad so everything bad that happens to him is good”
sentiment, but she didn’t. She directly contradicted it.

She
actually chose to do the right thing. I’m gobsmacked, and it’s
not an exaggeration to say that my hope for humanity sparked up a
little today.

If
the resting smugfaced apex of liberal psychosis is getting this one
right, then many more will surely follow. And indeed, many already
are. In addition to 
Hayes’
coverage of the story
,
MSNBC’s 
Ari
Melber also did a segment
 harshly
criticizing the implications of Trump administration’s new charges.
We’re 
seeing multiple segments from
CNN about the grave dangers of the legal precedent that is being set
with the superseding indictment, as well as urgent warnings about the
new charges from major publications like the 
New
York Times
,
the 
Washington
Post
,
and the 
Guardian.

Chris Hayes

@chrislhayes

The Espionage indictment of Assange for publishing is an extremely dangerous, frontal attack on the free press. Bad, bad, bad.


11.3K

10:36 PM – May 23, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy


The outlets which have been smearing Assange relentlessly are now finding themselves forced to defend him.


A
typical comment under Maddow’s YouTube share of this segment reads
“This is very strange. Very alarming! There we go again. The GOP is
preparing the country for a Dictatorship.” And okay, that’s not
exactly what is happening (this has been a bipartisan push and it’s
not just preparations, we’re in full swing), but whatever, now this
viewer can actually see the monster’s outlines. Finally the Maddow
crowd which has been fruitlessly expending all their energy so far on
punching at Russian shadows will actually be attacking a real thing.

And
I’m quietly excited about that. I’m eager to see what happens to
the #Resistance if it actually starts #Resisting something. It
doesn’t matter that this is only happening because mainstream
liberal media outlets realized that they might be next on the
chopping block; it matters that it’s happening, period.

For
years mainstream liberals have been fixating on the fake Russiagate
psyop and rending their garments about Trump’s rude tweets while
commentators like me desperately implored them to pay attention to
the actual dangerous agendas that this administration is actually
advancing. They’ve been in a holding pattern of adamantly refusing
to do that, and now, because it’s threatening them personally,
we’re suddenly seeing a sharp deviation from that holding pattern.

As
Bill Murray said at the end of 
Groundhog
Day
,
something is different. Anything different is good.

Edward Snowden

@Snowden

The Department of Justice just declared war––€”not on Wikileaks, but on journalism itself. This is no longer about Julian Assange: This case will decide the future of media. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/politics/assange-indicted-espionage-act-first-amendment.html 


18.3K

10:27 PM – May 23, 2019

Though Julian Assange is not a conventional journalist, much of what he does at WikiLeaks is difficult to distinguish in a legally meaningful way from what traditional news organizations do.

Though Julian Assange is not a conventional journalist, much of what he does at WikiLeaks is difficult to distinguish in a legally meaningful way from what traditional news organizations do.

Assange Indicted Under Espionage Act, Raising First Amendment Issues

The WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange faces 17 new counts in a superseding indictment over his role in publishing classified documents in 2010.

nytimes.com





Support
Caitlin’s work on 
Patreon or Paypal.

Opinion
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Medium / Report
a typo

=======================================

Zie ook:

Belangrijk account voor de verdediging Julian Assange geblokkeerd door Twitter

Britse regering weigert RT en Sputnik voor conferentie over persvrijheid….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

CNN met nog smeriger lastercampagne tegen Julian Assange

Julian Assange: Speciaal VN rapporteur martelen heeft grote twijfels bij onafhankelijkheid rechter

Het westen vervolgt journalist Assange, Rusland laat journalist vrij na onrust over diens gevangenschap‘ (en nog hadden de reguliere media een grote bek over Rusland, media die niet anders hebben gedaan dan collega Assange besmeuren…..)

VN rapport: Assange is gedemoniseerd en psychisch gemarteld

Julian Assange weer vervolgd wegens ‘verkrachting’, waarvoor het Zweedse OM eerder geen bewijs kon vinden……

Dag van Persvrijheid: Assange wordt zoveel mogelijk uitermate hypocriet gemeden door de pers

Julian Assange (brekend nieuws) veroordeeld tot 50 weken gevangenisstraf……

Julian Assanges vervolging is de genadeklap voor klokkenluiders en (echte) journalisten

Brekend nieuws: EU neemt internet censuurwet aan……

Jan Kuitenbrouwer (‘journalist’): Assange is een charlatan en WikiLeaks heeft beelden van de moord op 2 journalisten gemanipuleerd

Chelsea Manning blijft voor onbepaalde tijd in de gevangenis

VN heeft eerder de ‘detentie’ van Assange al als onwettig verklaard

Brekend nieuws: EU neemt internet censuurwet aan……

VS Navy SEALs werden gewaarschuwd geen oorlogsmisdaden te melden‘ (zo valt er niets te lekken naar WikiLeaks, of de reguliere media….)

‘Journalisten’ tegen openheid‘ (‘journalisten’ waaronder Jan Kuitenbrouwer en de intussen overleden Max van Weezel, al wordt de laatste niet in dat bericht genoemd. Van Weezel zei een paar jaar geleden letterlijk dat hij ‘zich voor kan stellen’ berichten voor het publiek achter te houden, m.a.w.: dat heeft hij daadwerkelijk gedaan, waarom zou je dit anders melden als ‘journalist..?’)

En gerelateerd:

Robert Mueller lijdt aan dementie en maakt van Russiagate een nog belachelijker verhaal

Russiagate: VS en buitenlandse geheime diensten hebben de VS presidentsverkiezingen in 2016 gemanipuleerd

Russiagate: nog overtuigd van bestaan daarvan? Lees dit!‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

Russiagate gelovigen krijgen nieuwe klap: WikiLeaks kreeg de DNC mails van een klokkenluider, niet van Rusland…..‘ 

Russiagate: VS en buitenlandse geheime diensten hebben de VS presidentsverkiezingen in 2016 gemanipuleerd

Gifgasaanval Douma in elkaar gezet door ‘gematigde rebellen’

Ook de
gifgasaanval op Douma, april vorig jaar, die aan het reguliere
Syrische leger werd toegeschreven, is ontmaskerd als een false flag
operatie* van de gematigde rebellen……

Oké
eigenlijk geen nieuws, daar dit van meet af aan wel duidelijk was,
alleen het feit al dat het Syrische leger de strijd al had gewonnen,
maakte deze bewering al totaal belachelijk, immers waarom zou je de
bevolking vergassen, terwijl je de slag al hebt gewonnen en de hele
westerse wereld je al meermaals valselijk heeft beschuldigd van het
gebruiken van gifgas….???

Zoals
het voorgaande al aangaf, ook de eerdere gifgasaanvallen, zouden door
‘Assad zijn begaan’, waar deskundigen (ook van de VN) na onderzoek
keer op keer de zogenaamde gematigde rebellen aanwezen als de
daders…… Sterker nog: in het westen en zeker de landen die aan de
kant van de VS en de psychopathische moordenaars en verkrachters
(‘gematigde rebellen’) meevochten, dan wel hen steun verleenden
(zoals Nederland), wisten dat deze terreurgroepen beschikten over
sarin en chlorine, terwijl wapeninspecteurs van de VN en anderen uit
en te na hebben bewezen dat Syrië niet langer beschikte over
gifgassen (een herhaling van de massavernietigingswapens van Irak,
die dat land niet had, zoals VN wapeninspecteur Blix de wereld tot
vervelens toe heeft voorgehouden, alvorens de VS in 2003 een illegale oorlog tegen dat land begon en inderdaad die wapens werden niet aangetroffen…)

De ‘gifgasbommen’ in Douma zou door de Syrische luchtmacht zijn afgeworpen, echter een onderafdeling van de OPCW (in tegenstelling tot OPCW zelf) en andere deskundigen stellen dat dit niet kan, gezien de staat van deze bommen die men als bewijs aanvoerde en gezien de schade in de directe omgeving van die bommen…….

Lees het
volgende uitstekende artikel van Caitlin Johnstone met
een ‘lekkere’ sarcastische opmerking aan het eind, en geeft het door,
de reguliere media en de westerse politiek blijven, ondanks alle
bewijzen van het tegendeel, beweren dat de democratisch gekozen
regering Assad verantwoordelijk is voor de gifgasaanvallen die in Syrië werden gepleegd….

Leaked
Document Pokes Major Holes in Establishment Syria Narrative

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Leaked Document Pokes Major Holes in Establishment Syria Narrative

May
13, 2019 at 10:23 pm

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — “It
is hard to overstate the significance of this
revelation,” 
tweets former
British MP George Galloway of a 
new
report
 by
the Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media (WGSPM). “The
war-machine has now been caught red-handed in a staged chemical
weapons attack for the purposes of deceiving our democracies into
what could have turned into a full-scale war amongst the
great-powers.”

An
important #Douma #Syria ‘Assad chemical weapon attack’
development and yet more evidence to suggest the ‘attack’ was
staged, as it’s now revealed that @OPCW suppressed expert engineers
report that found the cylinders were likely not dropped from the
air,” 
tweets former
Scotland Yard detective and counterterrorism intelligence officer
Charles Shoebridge.

The
engineering assessment confirms our earlier conclusion,” the
excellent 
Moon
of Alabama
 blog writes.
“The whole scene as depicted by ‘rebels’ and propaganda organs
was staged. The more than 34 dead on the scene were murdered
elsewhere under unknown circumstances.”

Charles Shoebridge@ShoebridgeC

An important ‘Assad chemical weapon attack’ development and yet more evidence to suggest the ‘attack’ was staged, as it’s now revealed that @OPCW suppressed expert engineers report that found the cylinders were likely not dropped from the airhttp://syriapropagandamedia.org/working-papers/assessment-by-the-engineering-sub-team-of-the-opcw-fact-finding-mission-investigating-the-alleged-chemical-attack-in-douma-in-april-2018 


947

10:56 AM – May 13, 2019

Assessment by the engineering sub-team of the OPCW Fact-Finding Mission investigating the alleged…

Paul McKeigue, David Miller, Piers Robinson Members of Working Group on Syria, Propaganda and Media 1 Introduction 2 Commentary on the Engineering Assessment 2.1 Methodology 2.2 Results: Location 2…

syriapropagandamedia.org

The
report has grabbed the attention of those who’ve expressed
skepticism of establishment Syria narratives because it casts serious
doubts on the official story we’ve been told to believe about an
alleged chemical attack in Douma, Syria in April of last year. A
document titled “Engineering Assessment of two cylinders observed
at the Douma incident” has been leaked to the WGSPM which reveals
that an engineering sub-team of the Organization for the Prohibition
of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) fact-finding mission in Douma came to
conclusions which differ wildly from the OPCW’s official findings
on the Douma incident, yet we the public were never permitted to see
this assessment.

The
assessment’s findings, which you can locate on pages five through
eight of 
the
document
,
put forward multiple hypothetical scenarios in which two gas
cylinders could have wound up in the locations(Location 2 and
Location 4) that they were photographed and video recorded as having
been found after the alleged attack. The assessment concludes that
“The dimensions, characteristics and appearance of the cylinders,
and the surrounding scene of the incidents, were inconsistent with
what would have been expected in the case of either cylinder being
delivered from an aircraft. In each case the alternative hypothesis
produced the only plausible explanation for observations at the
scene.”

The
assessment says more thoroughly and technically what I 
argued
in an article last year
,
that the physics of the air-dropped cylinder narrative make no sense
whatsoever. This is a problem, because the reason we were given for
the US, UK and France launching airstrikes on Syrian government
targets in April of 2018 was that two cylinders full of poison gas
had been dropped from aircraft by the Syrian air force and killed
dozens of civilians.

The
assessment is signed by Ian Henderson, who the WGSPM were able to
verify as a longtime OPCW-trained inspection team leader. The OPCW
reportedly denied that Henderson was involved in its Douma
fact-finding mission, but the WGSPM counters that “This statement
is false. The engineering sub-team could not have been carrying out
studies in Douma at Locations 2 and 4 unless they had been notified
by OPCW to the Syrian National Authority (the body that oversees
compliance with the Chemical Weapons Convention) as FFM** inspectors:
it is unlikely that Henderson arrived on a tourist visa.”

Caitlin Johnstone ⏳@caitoz

So far this is the establishment narrative management machine’s only attempt at refuting the latest revelations indicating that the attack last year was staged. It basically boils down to “They’re conspiracy theorists and the official narrative disagrees with them.”

EA WorldView@EA_WorldView

#Syria Special: Solving a Mystery About The Deadly Chemical Attack on #Doumahttps://www.facebook.com/EAWorldView/photos/a.1820058271609914/2305766406372429/?type=3&theater 

View image on Twitter

Just
as interesting as this new report has been the response of the usual
establishment Syria narrative managers to it, or rather the lack
thereof. NATO narrative management firm 
Bellingcat,
which normally jumps all over these kinds of revelations in an
attempt to discredit them, has been maintaining radio silence as of
this writing. Its founder, Eliot Higgins, has had nothing to say on
the matter other than to 
retweet a
pathetic rebuttal by his mini-me Scott Lucas and take a few 
childish
jabs
 at
me for highlighting this fact.

Scott
Lucas’
 Facebook
post
 on
the WGSPM report remains as of this writing the only attempt from the
Syria narrative management machine to address it, and it boils down
to nothing more than assertions that the report contradicts the
official OPCW narrative (duh) and that the WGSPM are conspiracy
theorists. Lucas may have thought it a good idea to author this post
believing that he had a more substantial argument than he actually
had, but it 
was
pointed out
 shortly
after publication that his claim about Henderson refusing to consider
other possible scenarios in his assessment is directly contradicted
by the words that are in the assessment, and Lucas was 
forced
to make a hasty revision
.

There
will be other counter-narratives released by the Syria narrative
management machine, to be sure, but the fact that this report has
been out for the better part of the day with nary a peep from that
lot reveals a great deal about the difficulties they’re having with
this one.

We
are being lied to about Syria
.
Anyone who believes unproven assertions about governments targeted
for toppling by the US-centralized empire has failed to learn the
lessons of history. The Syrian government had literally nothing to
gain strategically from using chemical weapons in Douma, a battle it
had already won, and knew full well that doing so would provoke an
attack from the empire. Douma was occupied by the 
Al
Qaeda-linked
 Jaysh
Al-Islam, who had at that point nothing to lose and everything to
gain by staging a false flag attack in a last-ditch attempt to get
NATO powers to function as its air force.

If
you still believe at this point that the Syrian government dropped
poison gas on Douma last year, then I’ve got some Iraqi WMDs to
sell you.

Support
Caitlin’s work on 
Patreon or Paypal.

=====================================

* Zie: ‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….‘ 

** FFM: Fact-Finding Mission.

Zie ook:

White Helmets oprichter overleden, het sein voor nog meer anti-Syrische propaganda

Massamedia treuren over de dood van een door de CIA gesteunde terrorist

MP Chris Williamson confronts UK government with apparent evidence of ‘staged’ chemical attack in Syria‘ De gifgasaanvallen die het reguliere Syrische leger zou hebben gepleegd, zijn onderdeel van ‘false flag’ operaties, ofwel men begaat een oorlogsmisdaad en schuift die de vijand in de schoenen, zie o.a. de eerste link hierboven: ‘False Flag terror’…enz……

VS terreuraanslag in Syrië op 3 tankwagens: 4 doden

Gifgasaanval Douma: OPCW rapport maakt korte metten met de westerse beschuldiging aan adres Syrië, waar de NOS een meer dan levensgrote bok schoot

VS heeft opstand en daarmee de oorlog in Syrië georganiseerd, zo toont WikiLeaks ten overvloede nog eens aan…….

‘Gematigde’ terreurgroepen in Syrië kregen Nederlands belastinggeld om te moorden, verkrachten, martelen en om te roven…….‘ met vervolg: Arrestatie Rutte, Koenders, Zijlstra en Blok wegens hulp aan terreurgroepen in Syrië van hoogste belang

Gifgasaanval Idlib: de komende ‘kindslachtoffers’ worden getraind door terreurgroep White Helmets………

White Helmets: naast gebruik van terreur ook schuldig aan orgaanhandel, vernietigende VN video presentatie

Syria: The White Helmets Are Terrorist Auxiliaries

White Helmets terreurgroep wordt vandaag met open armen ontvangen in Tweede Kamer…..

Al Jazeera filmde een onderdeel van de ‘gifgasshow’ in Kahn Sheikhoun………..

Vlaamse pater roept op niet langer de westerse anti-Syrië propaganda te geloven!

Syrische nonnen spreken zich uit tegen de oorlogspropaganda van westerse mogendheden en de reguliere westerse (massa-) media

CNN en andere media met doorzichtige oorlogspropaganda tegen de Syrische regering

VS geeft toe dat er geen bewijs is voor het gebruik van gifgas ‘door Assad’, ofwel: alweer ‘fake news’ van de massamedia doorgeprikt!

Voorbeeld BBC en AD propaganda inzake Idlib (Syrië)

John Bolton geeft terreurgroepen in Syrië de opdracht een false flag gifgasaanval uit te voeren

Assad heeft geen gifgas gebruikt tegen de Syrische bevolking!

Oost-Ghouta, wat je niet wordt verteld

BBC World Service en BNR met ‘fake news’ over Ghouta……..

Syrië: nieuwe gifgasaanval als ‘false flag’ operatie tegen Syrisch bewind in voorbereiding……..

Ghouta: een gifgas false flag en VS chef Guterres eist staakt het vuren van pro-Syrische strijdgroepen op Oost-Ghouta……

Van Kappen (VVD) noemt ‘stapelaanwijzingen’ het bewijs en is blij met raketaanval VS op Syrische basis,  een aanval zonder enig echt bewijs voor Syrische schuld…….

Sico van der Meer (‘deskundige’ Clingendael) weet niet, dat Israël en Egypte grote hoeveelheden gifgas maken en op voorraad hebben……….

Koenders en SOHR melden gifgasaanval, reguliere media als NOS nemen bericht van SOHR (propaganda en ‘fake news’ orgaan) over

Rutte: raketaanval VS tegen Syrische basis was begrijpelijk en proportioneel, ook al is er geen bewijs voor Syrische schuld……..

Haley (VS ambassadeur bij VN) herhaalde in VN, voorafgaand aan raketaanval, het smerige spel van Powell in 2002, aanleiding tot illegale oorlog tegen Irak…….‘  

‘Koenders (PvdA BuZa): Assad is schuldig aan gifgasaanval en is een ‘criminele recidivist……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Esther de Lange (CDA): het afschieten door de VS van raketten op een Syrische basis ‘was even nodig………..’

VS bereid tot militair ingrijpen tegen de regering Assad >> aanleiding: gifgas leugens van o.a. de VS zelf…….

Bernard Hammelburg (BNR): Assad is een monster waar we mee moeten samenwerken………

Van Baalen (VVD) het is moeilijk te zien wie je moet steunen: Al Qaida, Al Qaida of Al Qaida……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) laat weten hoe White Helmets vips rekruteren met Saoedisch geld….

Sophie in ‘t Veld (D66): het afschieten door de VS van raketten op een Syrische basis ‘was even nodig………..’

Genocidale aanval op sjiitische vluchtelingen uit Foua en Kefraya wordt door massamedia afgedaan als ‘een ongelukje’, of  volgens CNN zelfs als een ‘hiccup………

Exactly how the US trained and armed ISIS

Tulsi Gabbard (VS congres Hawaï): Trump is de beschermende Big Brother van Al Qaida

John Bolton (VS nationaal ‘veiligheidsadviseur’): het is een goede zaak om te liegen over oorlog…….

Caitlin
Johnstone schreef een artikel op haar site waarin ze een
uitspraak van Bolton aanhaalde, waarin hij openlijk stelde dat het
goed is om te liegen over oorlog (en oorlogsmisdaden, iets dat
oorlogsmisdadiger Bolton er uiteraard niet bij vertelde)

Johnstone
kreeg van Whitney Webb een video uit 2010 waarin psychopaat Bolton deze en
andere ongelofelijke uitspraken durfde te doen. Alsof het zijn zaak
extra zou ondersteunen haalde Bolton een uitspraak aan van Winston
Churchill (die in de 20er jaren van de vorige eeuw nog mosterdgas
inzette tegen bedoeïenen in wat nu Irak is…..), de vertaling van deze uitspraak komt ongeveer neer op: de waarheid in een oorlog is zo belangrijk dat deze omringd
moet worden door leugen lijfwachten….. (de Engelse versie die Bolton gebruikte vind je in het hieronder opgenomen artikel van Johnstone)

Om zijn
uitspraak nog meer kracht bij te zetten stelde Bolton dat het
noodzakelijk was om te liegen over D-day….. Alsof dit ook maar
enigszins is te vergelijken met de illegale oorlogen die de VS sinds
WOII voert, dit wel of niet in combinatie met een geheime
economische oorlog, om zo een opstand te veroorzaken, waarmee een
regime verandering zou kunnen worden doorgedrukt…..

Als het voorgaande niet lukt staat uiteraard het scenario van een VS invasie nog ter
beschikking, ook al een beproefd recept van de VS. Naast geheime
militaire CIA acties en het vermoorden van verdachten middels drones (waar meer dan
90% van de slachtoffers niet eens werd verdacht), heeft de VS sinds
het eind van WOII meer dan 22,5 miljoen mensen vermoord (waarbij de VS
deels ook de NAVO gebruikte, waarover dit land permanent het
opperbevel voert…)…..

Lees het
ontluisterend verhaal van Johnstone en zegt het voort, we zijn meer
dan overtijd als het gaat om het blind zijn bij het overgrote deel
van de westerse bevolking voor de grootschalige terreur die de VS
gebruikt tegen een fiks deel van de wereld…….. Terreur ook uit
onze naam, zo was Nederland betrokken bij de voorbereiding van de
oorlog tegen Irak, die ons land ook nog eens politiek en militair
steunde……. Terreur die mede met ons belastinggeld werd en wordt uitgeoefend….. 

Om over de enorme kosten die oorlogsvoering met zich meebrengen maar te zwijgen, kosten
voor wederopbouw van het land dat door de VS in puin werd gelegd,
kosten voor behandeling van oorlogsslachtoffers en de kosten die
worden gemaakt voor vluchtelingen (waar de ellende voor deze mensen
niet eens in geld is uit te drukken…), vluchtelingen die met vele
duizenden al zijn verdronken in de Middellandse en Egeïsche Zee…..
Kosten als de 6 miljard euro die de EU aan Turkije gaf om
vluchtelingen af te schrikken, gevangen te zetten en tegen te houden als ze willen vluchten naar de EU, terwijl EU landen, zoals gezegd, mede hoo
fdverantwoordelijk zijn voor
de reden waarom deze mensen hun moederland ontvluchtten……

De brutaliteit die oorlogshitsers als de topman van Washington Institute Of Near East Policy (WINEP), Patrick Clawson, ten toon spreiden is ongekend, zo pleitte deze smerige oorlogshitser openlijk voor een false flag operatie om zo een reden te creëren waarmee de VS Iran (zogenaamd legitiem) aan kan vallen (de link naar dat gebeuren vind je in het artikel van Johnstone). Met die strijdbijl heeft de VS al veel vaker gehakt, neem de reden voor deelname van de VS aan de Eerste en Tweede Wereldoorlog, of de oorlog van de VS tegen Noord-Vietnam……

Het artikel van Johnstone nam ik over van Anti-Media:

That
Time John Bolton Said It’s Good to Lie About War

May
16, 2019 at 8:37 am

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) — Journalist
Whitney Webb recently 
tweeted a
2010 video clip I’d never seen before featuring US National
Security Advisor John Bolton defending the use of deception in
advancing military agendas, which highlights something we should all
be paying attention to as Trump administration foreign policy 
becomes
increasingly Boltonized
.

On
a December 2010 episode of Fox News’ 
Freedom
Watch
,
Bolton and the show’s host Andrew Napolitano were 
debating
about recent WikiLeaks publications
,
and naturally the subject of government secrecy came up.

Now
I want to make the case for secrecy in government when it comes to
the conduct of national security affairs, and possibly for deception
where that’s appropriate,” 
Bolton
said
.
“You know Winston Churchill said during World War Two that in
wartime truth is so important it should be surrounded by a bodyguard
of lies.”

Do
you really believe that?” asked an incredulous Napolitano.

Absolutely,”
Bolton replied.

You
would lie in order to preserve the truth?”

If
I had to say something I knew was false to protect American national
security, I would do it,” Bolton answered.

I
don’t think we’re often faced with that difficulty, but would I
lie about where the D-Day invasion was going to take place to deceive
the Germans, you’d better believe it,” Bolton continued.

Why
do people in the government think that the laws of society or the
rules don’t apply to

them?”
Napolitano asked.

Because
they are not dealing in the civil society we live in under the
Constitution,” Bolton replied. “They are dealing in the anarchic
environment internationally where different rules apply.”

But
you took an oath to uphold the Constitution, and the Constitution
mandates certain openness and certain fairness,” Napolitano
protested. “You’re willing to do away with that in order to
attain a temporary military goal?”

I
think as Justice Jackson said in a famous decision, the Constitution
is not a suicide pact,” Bolton said. “And I think defending the
United States from foreign threats does require actions that in a
normal business environment in the United States we would find
unprofessional. I don’t make any apology for it.”

So
that’s a thing. And it’s important for us to know it’s a thing
because of the way things are heating up in Iran right now, since
Bolton’s fingerprints 
are
all over it
.

Bolton
has long been 
calling
for war with Iran
 and
in a paid speech in July 2017 
told
his

pro-egime
change MEK terror cult audience
 that
they would be celebrating the successful overthrow of the Iranian
government together before 2019. Now we’re seeing 
threat
alarms being elevated
 and fearmongering
about Iranian missiles
 being
circulated, with reports being 
leaked
to the press
 of
possible plans to send 120,000 US troops to the region.

This
is an environment that is ripe for deceptions of all sorts, and,
given what Bolton said on live television nearly a decade ago, we
would all do very well to remain very, very skeptical of any and all
news we hear about Iran going forward. If for example you hear that
within this environment of escalated tensions and military posturing
Iran or one of its “proxies” has attacked the United States in
some way, your immediate response should be one of intense skepticism
about what the mass media talking heads are telling you to believe.

Back
in 2012 at a forum for the Washington Institute Of Near East Policy (WINEP) think tank, the group’s Director of Research Patrick Clawson 
openly
talked about the possibility of using a false flag
 to
provoke a war with Iran.

I
frankly think that crisis initiation is really tough, and it’s very
hard for me to see how the United States president can get us to war
with Iran,” 
Clawson
began
.

(Can
I just pause here to note what a bizarre series of words that is?
“Get us to war with Iran?”

Get
us to the thing that every sane human being wants to avoid with every
fiber of their being? You want to “get us to” there? This is not
the kind of thing normal humans say. You only hear this kind of
insanity in the DC swamp where creatures like John Bolton have their
roots.)

Which
leads me to conclude that if in fact compromise is not coming, that
the traditional way that America gets to war is what would be best
for US interests,” Clawson added. “Some people might think that
Mr. Roosevelt wanted to get us into the war… you may recall we had
to wait for Pearl Harbor. Some people might think that Mr. Wilson
wanted to get us into World War One; you may recall we had to wait
for the Lusitania episode. Some people might think that Mr. Johnson
wanted to get us into Vietnam; you may recall we had to wait for the
Gulf of Tonkin episode. We didn’t go to war with Spain until the
USS Maine exploded. And may I point out that Mr. Lincoln did not feel
that he could call out the Army until Fort Sumter was attacked, which
is why he ordered the commander at Fort Sumter to do exactly that
thing which the South Carolinians said would cause an attack.”

So
if, in fact, the Iranians aren’t going to compromise, it would be
best if somebody else started the war,” Clawson continued. “One
can combine other means of pressure with sanctions. I mentioned that
explosion on August 17th. We could step up the pressure. I mean look
people, Iranian submarines periodically go down. Some day, one of
them might not come up. Who would know why? We can do a variety of
things, if we wish to increase the pressure (I’m not advocating
that) but I’m just suggesting that this is not an either/or
proposition — just sanctions have to succeed or other things.
We are in the game of using covert means against the Iranians.

We
could get nastier at that.”

WikiLeaks
@wikileaks

“We Know Where Your Kids Live” John Bolton threatened head of chemical weapons commission as part of effort launch war against Iraq https://theintercept.com/2018/03/29/john-bolton-trump-bush-bustani-kids-opcw/ 

1,664

6:10 AM – Apr 2, 2018

“We Know Where Your Kids Live”: How John Bolton Once Threatened an International Official

“John Bolton is a bully,” said José Bustani, a retired Brazilian diplomat. “I don’t know how people can work for him.”

theintercept.com


So
these are ideas that have been in circulation for many years. That
gun is loaded and ready to fire.

Bolton
trussed up his 2010 confession using an example that most people
would agree with: that it was reasonable for the Allied forces
to 
deliberately
deceive the Nazis
 about
the nature of the D-Day invasion. But we know John Bolton better than
that by now.

This PNAC
director
 and
architect of the Iraq war 
once
threatened to murder a foreign official’s children
 because
his successful diplomatic efforts were putting a damper on the
manufacturing of consent for the Iraq invasion. He wasn’t defending
the use of deception in crucial military options used to halt tyrants
trying to take over the world, he was defending the use of deception
in the senseless wars of aggression that he has built his political
career on advancing.

Take
everything you hear about Iran with a planet-sized grain of salt,
dear reader, and everything you hear about Venezuela too while we’re
on the subject. There are skillful manipulators who are hell bent on
toppling the governments of those nations, and they have absolutely
no problem whatsoever with deceiving you in order to facilitate that.
And they don’t believe the rules apply to them.

Support
Caitlin’s work on 
Patreon or Paypal.

Opinion
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Medium / Report
a typo

Gruwelijke Russische doomsday wapens: o.a. walvissen, krekels en Pokémon

Je zou
wellicht denken dat onze reguliere media bij tijd en wijle knettergek
zijn met het herhalen van bijvoorbeeld aantoonbare VS leugens, maar zelfs dat kan men bij de makers van die leugens, dus de VS, altijd nog veel beter.

Het
volgende uiterst humoristische en sarcastische artikel, geschreven
door Caitlin Johnstone en afgelopen donderdag gepubliceerd, moet je lezen, maar
let op: het gevaar bestaat dat je in een lachstuip blijft!

Whales,
Crickets, And Other Fearsome Russian Doomsday Weapons

Caitlin
Johnstone

Headlines
were blaring the word “Russian” again the other day because
the mass media narrative managers found yet another reason for
westerners to feel terrified of the icy potato patch that we’d barely
ever thought about prior to 2016. I’d like to talk about the
Kremlin’s latest horrifying horrific addition to its fearsome
doomsday artillery, and recap a few of the other incredibly
frightening and terrifying tactics that those strange
Cyrillic-scribbling demons of the East are employing to undermine
truth, justice, and the American way. Just to make sure we’re
all good and scared like we’re supposed to be.

Gather
the kids, clutch your pearls and sign off on hundreds of billions of
dollars of extra military spending, my patriotic brethren! Here are
five super scary ways the Red Menace is trying to destroy you and
everything you hold dear:

1.
Whales

USA TODAY

@USATODAY

Is this beluga whale actually a Russian spy? https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2019/04/29/beluga-whale-discovered-harness-could-russian-military/3617313002/ 


Spy games? Russia could be using beluga whales for military purposes

A whale  has been discovered in waters near Norway with tight harnesses on it, which could have been attached by the Russian military.

usatoday.com

Headlines
and TV news segments from virtually all mainstream outlets were
falling all over themselves the other day to report the fact that
some Norwegians found a tame beluga whale with a harness on it, and
“experts” attest that the animal may have been part of a
covert espionage program for the Russian navy.

While
there is no indication that this spying cetacean has been trained in
the arts of sonar election meddling or shooting novichok from its
blowhole, 
the Guardian helpfully
informs us
 that
the harness was labeled “Equipment of St. Petersburg”, and
was equipped to hold “a camera or weapon”.

“Marine
experts in Norway believe they have stumbled upon a white
whale that was trained by the Russian navy as part of a programme to
use underwater mammals as a special ops force,”
the 
Guardian reports.

The
Norwegian tabloid 
Verdens
Gang
,
which picked up on the discovery well before the breathless English
headlines began gracing us with their presence, is a teensy bit less
Ian Flemingesque in its reporting on the matter: the harness 
is
equipped for a GoPro camera
.
The words “Equipment of St. Petersburg” 
are
written in English
.

Why
is the Russian military writing “Equipment of St. Petersburg”
in English on the garments of its aquatic special ops forces, you may
ask? If there were indeed a secret beluga espionage squad assembled
by Russian intelligence services, would they not perhaps avoid
writing the home address of the whales on their harnesses altogether,
and maybe, you know, 
not let
them run free in the wild?

And
to that I would say, stop asking so many questions. That’s just what
Putin wants.

2.
Crickets

Glenn Greenwald

@ggreenwald

NBC and MSNBC Blamed Russia for Using “Sophisticated Microwaves” to Cause “Brain Injuries” in U.S. “Diplomats” in Cuba. The Culprits Were Likely Crickets. https://theintercept.com/2019/01/07/nbc-and-msnbc-blamed-russia-for-using-sophisticated-microwaves-to-cause-brain-injuries-in-u-s-diplomats-in-cuba-the-culprits-were-likely-crickets/ 


2,228

6:54 PM – Jan 7, 2019

NBC and MSNBC Blamed Russia for Using “Sophisticated Microwaves” to Cause “Brain Injuries” in U.S….

We now have what might be the most vivid, reckless and dangerous illustration yet of how NBC functions.

theintercept.com

report seeded
throughout the mainstream media by anonymous intelligence officials
last September claimed that US government workers in Cuba had
suffered concussion-like brain damage after hearing strange noises in
homes and hotels with the most likely culprit being “sophisticated
microwaves or another type of electromagnetic weapon” from Russia.
A recording of one such highly sophisticated attack was analyzed by
scientists and 
turned
out to be the mating call of the male indies short-tailed cricket
.
Neurologists and other brain specialists 
have
challenged the claim
 that
any US government workers suffered any neurological damage of any
kind, saying test results on the alleged victims were

misinterpreted.

The
actual story, when stripped of hyperventilating Russia panic, is that
some government workers once heard some horny crickets in Cuba.

*cough*

3.
Puppies

Consortium News@Consortiumnews

Robert Parry explores the strange mystery of the Russia-gate puppies, https://consortiumnews.com/2017/10/04/the-mystery-of-the-russia-gate-puppies/ 


50

11:29 PM – Oct 4, 2017

Twitter Ads info and privacy


The Mystery of the Russia-gate Puppies

Exclusive: The U.S. mainstream media is determined to prove Russia-gate despite the scandal’s cracking foundation and its inexplicable anomalies, such as why Russia would set up a Facebook “puppies”…

consortiumnews.com

Ye
gads, is is nothing sacred? Is there any weapon these monsters won’t
use to transform the west into a giant, globe-spanning Mordor?

That’s
right, in 2017 puppies became one of the many, many things we’ve been
instructed to fear in the hands of our vodka-swilling enemy to the
east, with mass media outlets reporting that a Facebook group for
animal lovers was one of the sinister, diabolical tactics employed by
St. Petersburg’s notorious Internet Research Agency. As the 
Moon
of Alabama
 blog has
explained
,
the only evidence we’ve seen so far actually indicates that the
Internet Research Agency’s operations in America served no purpose
other than to attract eyeballs for money. As journalist
Aaron Maté 
wrote of
the highly publicized Russian Facebook meddling, “Far from being
a sophisticated propaganda campaign, it was small, amateurish, and
mostly unrelated to the 2016 election.”

The
late, great Robert Parry, one of the earliest and most outspoken
critics of the Russiagate narrative, covered this one for 
Consortium
News
 in
an article
 he
authored a few months before his untimely passing:

“As
Mike Isaac and Scott Shane of The New York Times 
reported in
Tuesday’s editions, “The Russians who posed as Americans on
Facebook last year tried on quite an array of disguises. … There
was even a Facebook group for animal lovers with memes of adorable
puppies that spread across the site with the help of paid ads.”

Now,
there are a lot of controversial issues in America, but I don’t
think any of us would put puppies near the top of the list. Isaac and
Shane reported that there were also supposedly Russia-linked groups
advocating gay rights, gun rights and black civil rights, although
precisely how these divergent groups were “linked” to Russia or
the Kremlin was never fully explained. (Facebook declined to offer
details.)

At
this point, a professional journalist might begin to pose some very
hard questions to the sources, who presumably include many partisan
Democrats and their political allies hyping the evil-Russia
narrative. It would be time for some lectures to the sources about
the consequences for taking reporters on a wild ride in conspiracy
land.

Yet,
instead of starting to question the overall premise of this
“scandal,” journalists at The New York Times, The Washington
Post, CNN, etc. keep making excuses for the nuttiness. The
explanation for the puppy ads was that the nefarious Russians might
be probing to discover Americans who might later be susceptible to
propaganda.

The
goal of the dog lovers’ page was more obscure,” Isaac and Shane
acknowledged. “But some analysts suggested a possible motive: to
build a large following before gradually introducing political
content. Without viewing the entire feed from the page, now closed by
Facebook, it is impossible to say whether the Russian operators tried
such tactics.”

4.
Pokémon

Yes, Pokémon.

This
Russia hysteria has been a long, wild ride, and sometimes it’s
honestly felt like they’re just experimenting on us. Like they’ve
been testing the limits of how ridiculous they can make this thing
and still get mainstream Americans to swallow it. Like the
establishment propagandists are all sitting around in a room smoking
blunts and making bets with each other all,

I’m
telling you, we can sell a Pokémon Go Kremlin conspiracy.”

Do
it!”

No
way. There’s no way they’ll go for it.”

Yeah
well you said that about the puppy dogs!”

And
then they release their latest experiment in social manipulation and
place bets on how many disgruntled Hillary voters they can get
retweeting it saying “God dammit, I 
knew that
jigglypuff looked suspicious!”

The
October 2017
 CNN
report
 which
sparked off a full day of shrieking “OMG THEY’RE EVEN USING
PIKACHU TO ATTACK OUR DEMOCRACY” headlines was titled
“Exclusive: Even Pokémon Go used by extensive Russian-linked
meddling effort”, and it reported that Russia had extended its
“tentacles” into the popular video game for the
purpose of election meddling. Apparently the Internet Research Agency
attempted to hold a contest using the game to highlight police
brutality against unarmed Black men, which of course is something
that only an evil autocracy would ever do. 

Not
until 
the
fifteenth paragraph
 of
the article did we see the information which undercut all the frantic
arm flailing about Russians destroying democracy and warping our
children’s fragile little minds:

“CNN
has not found any evidence that any Pokémon Go users attempted to
enter the contest, or whether any of the Amazon Gift Cards that were
promised were ever awarded — or, indeed, whether the people who
designed the contest ever had any intention of awarding the prizes.”

Mmm
hmm.

5.
Laughter

Mark Ames

@MarkAmesExiled

Turns out jokes are a Russian disinformation conspiracy.

Is nothing safe? What will those barbarian Others think of next? Weaponizing our tears? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-46567364 


587

6:45 PM – Dec 15, 2018

Russian President Vladimir Putin smiles during his meeting with athletes at the Russia in October 2018

Russian President Vladimir Putin smiles during his meeting with athletes at the Russia in October 2018

How Putin’s Russia turned humour into a weapon

Russia’s government wants people to have a laugh – as long as it’s at its opponents’ expense, and not Mr Putin’s.

bbc.co.uk

Late
last year the BBC 
published
an article
 titled
“How Putin’s Russia turned humour into a weapon” about yet
another addition to the Kremlin’s horrifying deadly hybrid
warfare arsenal: comedy. The article’s author,
ironically 
titled “Senior
Journalist (Disinformation)” by the BBC, argues that Russia has
suddenly discovered laughter as a way to “deliberately lower
the level of discussion”.

Russia’s
move towards using humour to influence its campaigns is a relatively
recent phenomenon,” the article explained, without speculating as
to why Russians might have suddenly begun laughing at their western
accusers.

Is
it perhaps possible that Russian media have begun mocking the west a
lot more because westerners have made themselves much easier to make
fun of? Could it perhaps be the fact that western mass media have
been doing absolutely insane things like constantly selling us the
idea that the Kremlin could be lurking behind anything in our world,
even really innocuous-looking things like puppy dogs, Pokémon
and whales? Could we perhaps be finding ourselves at the butt end of
jokes now because in 2016 our society went bat shit, pants-on-head,
screaming-at-passing-motor-vehicles insane?

Nahhh.
Couldn’t be. It’s the Russians who’ve gone mad.

Everyone
has my 
unconditional
permission
 to
republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve
written) in any way they like free of charge. My work is 
entirely
reader-supported
,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, 
click
here
.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
May 2, 2019 at 12:54 pm |

Tags: hysteriamediaPoliticsPutinRussiawhale |
Categories: 
Article |
URL: 
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1FG

Trump vermoordde al 40.000 Venezolaanse burgers

Caitlin
Johnstone publiceerde een artikel op haar site n.a.v. een studie
gedaan door het Center for Economic and Policy Research (CEPR), waaruit de
conclusie is getrokken dat rond de 40.000 Venezolanen zijn omgekomen
door de sancties van de Trump administratie. Een beetje te snel door
de bocht, als je het mij vraagt, daar onder Obama al een geheime
economische oorlog werd gevoerd tegen het regime van Maduro…..* Alles bij elkaar, dus inclusief de
periode dat Obama aan het bewind was, zijn er heel wat meer slachtoffers gevallen dan de genoemde 40.000…..

Overigens
is de verwachting dat het aantal doden verder zal stijgen, daar de
Trump administratie de sancties tegen Venezuela in januari dit jaar
heeft vergroot……..

In een
aantal punten geeft Johnstone weer hoe de situatie door de VS
sancties is verslechtert voor de bevolking in Venezuela en dat de
sancties niet doen waar ze zogenaamd voor bedoeld waren: de top van
de Venezolaanse regering en het leger treffen, de groepen die wel
worden getroffen zijn de zwakste in de bevolking van Venezuela,
waarvoor Johnstone een aantal groepen aanwijst…..

Volkomen
terecht concludeert Johnstone dat deze, in feite oorlogsvoering tegen
de bevolking van Venezuela, ingaat tegen het Verdrag van Genève en het Verdrag van
Den Haag, waar dit soort sancties worden gezien als een ernstige
oorlogsmisdaad, beide verdragen zijn door de VS ondertekend……

Zoals je ongetwijfeld weet is dit soort oorlogsvoering door de VS erop gericht de bevolking ontevreden te maken en dat men in dit geval het aftreden van Maduro zal eisen, deze opzet is gelukkig niet geslaagd, zoals deze ook in Syrië niet heeft gewerkt. Schandelijk dat dit VS spel in beide gevallen tot een enorm aantal doden heeft geleid…….

Johnstone
vergelijkt e.e.a. met de oorlog tegen Libië en die tegen de
sjiitische bevolking van Jemen, oorlogen waarvoor de VS in feite
verantwoordelijk is. In Libië is dit al lang duidelijk, maar wat
betreft Jemen beseffen velen niet dat de VS de genocide in Jemen
vandaag nog kan beëindigen, een genocide waarvoor de Saoedische
terreurcoalitie verantwoordelijk is, echter dat is tegen de wil van
Trump, die zijn veto heeft uitgesproken over het stoppen van de militaire hulp en wapenleveringen** aan de reli-fascistische Saoedische dictatuur……

Het
artikel van Johnstone heb ik overgenomen van Anti-Media:

Trump
Has Murdered Over 40,000 Venezuelans With Sanctions: Study

April
25, 2019 at 6:09 pm

Written
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone

(CJ Opinion) 
A new 
study
from the Center for Economic and Policy Research
 (CEPR)
has found that tens of thousands of Venezuelans have died as a direct
result of Trump administration sanctions put into effect in August
2017, and that tens of thousands more are expected to die as a result
of additional sanctions put into place in January of this year.

Some
noteworthy points:

  • The
    sanctions are “depriving Venezuelans of lifesaving medicines,
    medical equipment, food, and other essential imports.”

  • The
    sanctions “reduced the public’s caloric intake, increased
    disease and mortality (for both adults and infants), and displaced
    millions of Venezuelans who fled the country as a result of the
    worsening economic depression and hyperinflation.”

  • The
    sanctions “have inflicted, and continue to inflict, very serious
    harm to human life and health, including an estimated more than
    40,000 deaths from 2017–2018.”

  • That
    means 2019 deaths haven’t been added to this estimate. The year’s
    nearly half over, and more aggressive sanctions went into effect
    this past January.

  • Because
    of the sanctions, “some 22,000 doctors — about one third of
    the total — have left the country.”

  • The
    loss of so many billions of dollars of foreign exchange and
    government revenues was very likely the main shock that pushed the
    economy from its high inflation, when the August 2017 sanctions were
    implemented, into the hyperinflation that followed.”

  • The
    massive number of already highly at-risk Venezuelans hurting from
    the 2017 sanctions “virtually guarantee that the current
    sanctions, which are much more severe than those implemented before
    this year, are a death sentence for tens of thousands of
    Venezuelans. This is especially true if the projected 67 percent
    drop in oil revenue materializes in 2019.”

  • The
    United Nations finds that the groups most vulnerable to the
    accelerating crisis include children and adolescents (including many
    who can no longer attend school); people who are in poverty or
    extreme poverty; pregnant and nursing women; older persons;
    indigenous people; people in need of protection; women and
    adolescent girls at risk; people with disabilities; and people who
    identify as lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or intersex.”


  • The
    sanctions “would fit the definition of collective punishment of
    the civilian population as described in both the Geneva and Hague
    international conventions, to which the US is a signatory.”

Aaron Maté

@aaronjmate

This should be the biggest story in the country right now:

Dan Cohen

@dancohen3000

Important new @ceprdc study: US sanctions killed 40,000 Venezuelans between 2017-2018 and the sanctions announced in January will kill tens of thousands more if they are not reversed. http://cepr.net/press-center/press-releases/report-finds-us-sanctions-on-venezuela-are-responsible-for-tens-of-thousands-of-deaths 


1,274

5:48 PM – Apr 25, 2019

To
be clear, this unforgivable atrocity rests predominantly on the
shoulders of the Trump administration. It is true that Venezuela has
had deep economic troubles for years due to declining oil prices and
other issues, and it is true that the sanctions in question follow
longstanding
agenda of previous administrations
 and
were built on the foundation of an Obama policy declaring the
Venezuelan government an “extraordinary threat to national
security”. But the report is clear in its assessment that what took
the nation’s economy from a state of high inflation to
hyperinflation was the August 2017 sanctions, and that’s what’s
been causing these high numbers of deaths which will get even worse
due to the January 2019 sanctions.

To
put this in perspective for Trump supporters, 40,000 is also 
the
number of people
 estimated
to have died as a result of the disastrous Obama/Clinton
interventionism in Libya. And, again, that number only covers 2017
and 2018, and death tolls are predicted to accelerate this year.

This
would be the same President Trump, by the way, who 
recently
vetoed a congressional bill
 to
end the role of the United States in facilitating Saudi Arabia’s
war crimes in Yemen. Research from the Armed Conflict Location and
Event Data Project 
indicates
that up to 80,000 people had been killed
 in
this war as of the end of last year. This number applies to deaths by
military violence only, not to the other untold tens of thousands who
have died of starvation and cholera as a result of Saudi Arabia’s
inhuman blockades on imports and its 
deliberate
targeting
 of
farms, fishing boats, marketplaces, food storage sites and 
cholera
treatment centers
 with
airstrikes. Just for children under the age of five, the death toll
due to starvation alone 
is
believed to be over 85,000
.

Is
America great yet?

 

CODEPINK

@codepink

“These sanctions would fit the definition of collective punishment of the civilian population as described in both the Geneva and Hague international conventions.” @ceprdc

Sanctions are a form of warfare! http://cepr.net/publications/reports/economic-sanctions-as-collective-punishment-the-case-of-venezuela 


88

8:38 PM – Apr 25, 2019

Twitter Ads info and privacy


Economic Sanctions as Collective Punishment: The Case of Venezuela | Reports | CEPR

This paper looks at some of the most important impacts of the economic sanctions imposed on Venezuela by the US government since August of 2017.

cepr.net

Sanctions
are the only form of warfare where it’s considered perfectly
acceptable and legitimate to deliberately target a nation’s
civilian population with lethal force. The human corpses it creates
are just as dead as the human corpses created by overt military
violence, but because this form of violence happens in slow motion
it’s not treated like the same kind of horrific assault as if Trump
had ordered the carpet bombing of Caracas. The distinction makes no
difference to the dead and no difference to their loved ones, but it
makes all the difference in the world when it comes to manufacturing
public consent for murderous acts of interventionism.

The
way sanctions are discussed by the western political/media class,
they can even get away with blaming the deaths on the government
being targeted. They’ll say things like, “Maduro is starving his
people by not stepping down.” That tactic would never work with
other forms of lethal force. Imagine if Trump deployed a barrage of
Tomahawk missiles onto the most impoverished parts of a densely
populated city in Venezuela, then hearing anyone say “Well Maduro
actually exploded those people, because he wouldn’t do what we told
him to do.”

It
doesn’t work. Sanctions are a slower and more gruelling weapon of
war than bombs and missiles, but they’re vastly superior when it
comes to the matter of keeping the public asleep through depraved
acts of mass slaughter. Which is why everyone’s yammering about Joe
Biden’s presidential campaign announcement right now instead of
talking about this new CEPR report.

To
this day I still run into defenders of Trump’s Venezuela
interventionism (easily the most obnoxious and intellectually
dishonest political group I’ve ever encountered, for the record)
who insist that the sanctions are laser-targeted only at Venezuela’s
elites, having no impact on the suffering of the Venezuelan people.
This is exactly as stupid as believing that American bombs only kill
bad guys. Attacking an economy hurts the people who depend on that
economy to feed themselves and their children.

Sanctions
are an act of war which kill civilians just as dead as any other, and
this latest report helps make that a stark and undeniable reality for
us all.

Support
Caitlin’s work on 
Patreon or Paypal.

Opinion
by 
Caitlin
Johnstone
 /
Republished with permission / 
Medium / Report
a typo

================================

*  Een geheime economische oorlog: door winkelketens voor levensmiddelen
uit de VS onder druk te zetten hun winkels in Venezuela zo min
mogelijk of helemaal niet te bevoorraden. Hetzelfde deed de Obama
administratie met de grote farmaceuten, ook zij werden onder druk
gezet zo min mogelijk de voorraden voor Venezuela aan te vullen……
Onlangs nog werd bekend gemaakt dat de Trump administratie 5 miljard
dollar van Venezuela, voor aankopen van medicijnen in de VS, heeft geconfisqueerd….. Zie: 
VS heeft beslag gelegd op 5 miljard dollar van Venezuela voor medicijnaankopen‘ (en dan durft de VS het bewind Maduro te verwijten dat er geen medicijnen te krijgen zijn in Venezuela, overigens alweer een enorme leugen van de terroristische Trump administratie!)

** Wapenleveringen, daaronder versta ik naast wapens en munitie, ook de levering van rollend, varend en vliegend oorlogstuig.

Zie ook:

Venezuela: Edwin Koopmans (o.a. ‘deskundige’ van VPRO) met anti-Maduro propaganda

Tirannie op de straten van Washington, een vergelijking met de start van nazi-Duitsland

Pence to offer ‘carrots’ to Venezuela military, warnings to judges

Venezuela: vicepresident van de VS, Mike Pence, belooft militairen extra’s als ze overlopen naar kamp Guaidó

Venezuela: VS ministerie van BuZa publiceert per ongeluk een lijst met sadistische terreurdaden tegen het Venezolaanse volk

Venezolaanse ambassade in Washington belaagd, er mag zelfs geen voedsel worden gebracht….

Venezuela: VS zal desnoods militair geweld gebruiken om een vreedzame overgang van regime te bewerkstelligen…… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Venezuela: ultieme couppoging van Guaidó mislukt

VS dreigt Rusland, China en Iran met geweld vanwege hulp aan Venezolaanse volk…….

The Monroe Doctrine is Back, and as the Latest US Attack on Cuba Shows, Its Purpose is to Serve the Neoliberal Order‘ (een artikel van CounterPunch)

Venezuela: in geheime zitting in Washington is gesproken over een militaire inval

VS legt nog meer sancties op aan de bevolking van Venezuela, Cuba en Nicaragua

Venezuela is nog lang niet verslagen door de VS

Venezolaanse regering treft nieuwe regeling voor hulpgoederen van het Rode Kruis, ‘onafhankelijk NOS’ brengt alweer fake news

Venezuela: onafhankelijke journalisten ontmaskeren leugens over dit land bij presentatie voor de VN

Venezuela: 15 doden door sabotage elektriciteitsnet

Venezuela: bijt de VS in haar eigen staart?’

Venezuela: het VS volk wordt weer een oorlog in gelogen, zoals eerder in Irak, Libië en Syrië

Venezuela Aid Live >> Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) terecht tegen benefietconcert

Venezuela: humanitaire hulp stunt van de VS ingegeven om de kruistocht tegen Maduro een versnelling te geven

Jill Stein (US Green Party): de VS maakt zich druk over armoede in Venezuela terwijl de armen thuis kunnen doodvallen….

Venezuela: Abrams vindt een meerderheid in de VN Veiligheidsraad genoeg voor een gedwongen regeringswisseling

Venezuela: 4 belangrijke zaken aangaande humanitaire hulp waarover de reguliere media niet berichten

Venezuela zou humanitaire hulp weigeren, het echte verhaal ziet er ‘iets anders’ uit‘ (180 graden anders, wel te verstaan)

Venezuela: VS bedrijf dat wapens smokkelde is gelinkt aan CIA ‘Black Site’ centra

Congreslid Ilhan Omar fileert het monster Elliot Abrams, de speciale gezant van de VS voor Venezuela

BBC World Service radio >> fake news and other lies about Venezuela‘ (bericht van dit blog)

Joel Voordewind (CU 2de Kamer) bakt de ‘Venezolaanse vluchtelingencrisis’ op Curaçao wel erg bruin en van Ojik (GL 2de Kamer) schiet een Venezolaanse bok

Venezolaanse verandering van regime bekokstoofd door VS en massamedia

Guaidó is een ordinaire couppleger van de VS, e.e.a. gaat volledig in tegen de Venezolaanse constitutie

Venezuela >> regime change: ‘de 12 stappen methode’ die de VS gebruikt

Venezuela >> VS economische oorlogsvoering met gebruikmaking van o.a. IMF en Wereldbank

VS couppleger in Venezuela belooft VS Venezolaanse olie als hij de macht heeft overgenomen

Pompeo: US Military Obligated to “Take Down” the Iranians in Venezuela

(de opgeblazen oorlogshitser en oorlogsmisdadiger Pompeo beweert dat Hezbollah werkzaam is in Venezuela en daar een leger heeft dat gezien zijn woorden amper onderdoet voor de gezamenlijke NAVO troepen… ha! ha! ha! Ook hier is totaal geen bewijs voor deze belachelijke beschuldiging…)

Halliburton en Chevron hebben groot belang bij ‘regime change’ in Venezuela

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) gaf Guaidó, de door de VS gewenste leider, groen licht voor de coup in Venezuela

VS coup tegen Maduro in volle gang……..

Antiwar Hero Medea Benjamin Disrupts Pompeo Speech on Venezuela

Als de VS stopt met spelen van ‘politieagent’ en het vernielen van de wereld, zullen de slechte krachten winnen……

VS weer op oorlogspad in Latijns-Amerika: Venezuela het volgende slachtoffer…….

Venezuela: VS verandering van regime mislukt >> de Venezolanen wacht een VS invasie

Vast Majority of Democrats Remain Silent or Support Coup in Venezuela

Venezuela: ‘studentenprotest’ wordt uitgevoerd door ingehuurde troepen………

Abby Martin Busts Open Myths on Venezuela’s Food Crisis: ‘Shelves Fully Stocked’‘ (zie ook de video in dat artikel!)

Rex Tillerson waarschuwt Venezuela voor een coup en beschuldigt China van imperialisme…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Edwin Koopman (VPRO Bureau Buitenland) over Venezolaanse verkiezingen met anti-Maduro propaganda bij de ‘onafhankelijke NOS…..

EU neemt uiterst hypocriet sancties tegen de Venezolaanse regering Maduro………

Julian Assanges vervolging is de genadeklap voor klokkenluiders en (echte) journalisten

De hele
wereld kijkt mee naar wat er met Julian Assange gebeurt nu hij is
gevangengezet door GB, die hem tegen internationale regels in
ontvoerde uit de ambassade van Ecuador.

Caitlin
Johnstone publiceerde het hieronder opgenomen artikel op haar site, een artikel waarin ze uitlegt dat de gijzeling van
Assange veel verder gaat dan de zaak waarvoor Assange vastzit. Deze
zaak gaat elke (echte) journalist* aan, waar deze ook
werkzaam is in onze wereld, hetzelfde geldt uiteraard voor
klokkenluiders als Chelsea Manning, die volkomen terecht zware
(oorlogs-) misdaden openbaarde en doorspeelde naar WikiLeaks…..

Met de
informatie die Manning naar buiten bracht werd ten overvloede nog
eens bewezen dat de VS zich gedraagt als een politiemacht van een
bloedige dictatuur en waar die macht niet werd aangewezen door de
wereldgemeenschap, maar door de opvolgende regeringen in de VS…..
‘Een politiemacht’ die niet opkomt voor mensenrechten en democratie
zoals de VS keer op keer laat weten, maar die de belangen van de VS behartigen,
zoals het veiligstellen (‘stelen…’) van grote olievoorraden voor eigen gebruik…..

Met het
klokkenluiden van Manning werd ten overvloede nog eens aangetoond dat de
reguliere westerse media aan de leiband lopen van de plutocratische
eigenaren die deze media bezitten en van de westerse regeringen….. Het laatste daar die media en regeringen Assange afschilderen als een nep-journalist en WikiLeaks beschrijven
als een site die een groot aantal mensen in gevaar heeft gebracht. ‘Natuurlijk’ wijzen deze media Manning aan als een landverrader…….

Dit
alles waar deze media* juist het werk van Assange
hadden moeten doen en hem uit en te na hadden moeten beschermen en
helpen tegen de neoliberale willekeur en zucht naar censuur…. Niet
vreemd dus dat de reguliere westerse media negatief commentaar gaven op Assange na diens ontvoering uit de Ecuadoraanse ambassade in Londen……. Assange wordt gegijzeld in
een gevangenis die het Britse Guantanamo Bay wordt genoemd…… 

Het gaat om HM Prison Belmarsh, een gevangenis waar Assange zelfs niet met zijn familie en
advocaten mag spreken, een schande van formaat en een gang van zaken
die in een dictatuur thuishoort, hetzelfde geldt voor de hernieuwde
gevangenschap van Manning in de VS, Manning die ook al geruime tijd in isolatiefolter wordt gehouden……..

Johnstone heeft het gelijk aan haar kant, waar ze stelt dat de ontvoering en gijzeling van Assange een waarschuwing is voor iedere klokkenluider die zaken naar buiten wil brengen en voor iedere journalist die van plan is deze gelekte documenten te publiceren, zoals Assange dit deed op WikiLeaks…… Jammer dat Johnstone stelt dergelijke zaken niet te zullen publiceren, daar ze te bang is voor gevangenschap en zij is daarin jammer genoeg bepaald niet alleen…….. 

The
Prosecution Of Julian Assange Is Infinitely Bigger Than Assange

by Caitlin
Johnstone

Julian
Assange’s mother 
reported
yesterday
 that
the WikiLeaks founder has not been permitted any visitors during his
detention in Belmarsh Prison, including from doctors and his lawyers.
Doctors who visited Assange in the Ecuadorian Embassy 
have
attested
 that
he urgently needs medical care.

Belmarsh
is a maximum security prison sometimes referred to as “
the
UK’s Guantanamo Bay
“.

And
yet we’re asked to believe that this has something to do with an
alleged bail violation and a US extradition request for alleged
computer crimes carrying a maximum sentence of five years. If you
zoom out and listen to the less-informed chatter of the overt
propagandists and the brainwashed rank-and-file western mass media
consumers, you will also see that people believe this has something
to do with Russia and rape allegations as well.

Actually,
none of these things are true. Assange is being imprisoned under
draconian conditions for journalism, and 
for
journalism only
.
The Obama administration 
declined
to prosecute him
 after
WikiLeaks’ publication of the Manning leaks out of concern that doing
so would endanger press freedoms, and the Obama administration 
didn’t
have any more evidence
 at
its disposal than the Trump administration has now. The “crime”
Assange is accused of consists of nothing other than 
standard
journalistic practices
 that
investigative journalists 
engage
in all the time
,
including source protection and encouraging the source to obtain more
material. The only thing that has changed is an increased willingness
in the White House to prosecute journalists for practicing
journalism, and there are an 
abundance of reasons to
believe that he will be hit with 
far
more serious charges
 once
extradited to
 
US
soil. They’re not going to all this trouble for a bail violation and
a five-year maximum sentence.

But
if you zoom out even further, in the grand scheme of things this
barely even has anything to do with Assange. Sure, he has of course
been a thorn in the side of those who operate the transnational
western power alliance, and given the choice they would of course
prefer him to be locked up or dead than free and alive. But that’s
not what the corrupt influencers who are strangling our world are
shooting for here. They are making a grab for something much, much
bigger. Assange just happens to be a stepping stone along the way.

As
we’ve 
discussed
previously
,
the prosecution of Assange is really designed to set a legal
precedent which will enable the US government to imprison journalists
for trying to hold it to account using journalism. The reason you are
seeing the phrase “Assange is not a journalist” bleated
constantly by empire lackeys all around the world today is because
they need a counter-narrative for the indisputable fact that this
precedent poses a threat to journalists around the world, the
argument being that since Assange isn’t a journalist (
pure
bullshit
 by
the way), this isn’t setting a precedent for journalists. As though
their personal definition of what a “real journalist” is
will be the one used by the US government when determining whether or
not to prosecute other people for doing things similar to what
Assange did, instead of whatever definition happens to suit US
government agendas in that instance.

But
in order to get the really, really big picture perspective of what
these bastards are going for, we need to zoom out even further than
that.

In
the sci-fi novel 
Ender’s
Game
,
the young protagonist applies a vicious beating to one of his
bullies, killing him. When asked why he did this by his handlers, the
boy, who has been bred and raised to become a strategic savant,
explains that he did it not out of malice toward the bully, nor only
to win the fight, but to win all future fights as well. If the kids
at school see what savagery he’s capable of and know he’s not to be
trifled with, he won’t ever have to fight them.

If
this sounds a bit sociopathic to you, that’s because it is. And, with
the notable difference of the bully and victim roles being reversed,
this is exactly the principle we are seeing exercised with Assange.

The
entire world is watching what is being done to Assange currently. No
matter how propagandized you are, no matter how much you hate the man
personally, you’re watching that happen and learning a lesson from
it. And that lesson is, never do anything remotely like what that guy
did, or you’ll meet the same fate. This is the real goal of Assange’s
persecution, and it doesn’t impact merely one Australian publisher in
a UK jail cell, nor even merely the investigative journalists around
the world who are interested in practicing the lost art of holding
power to account using journalism, but everyone in the world who
consumes news media.

And
it works. I know it works because it works on me. I’ll say right here
and now, if you’ve got information that incriminates the most
powerful people in the world, keep it the hell away from me. Give it
to someone else, literally anyone else, because I myself am far too
cowardly and have far too much to lose by getting involved in
anything that could lead to me rotting in some overseas prison cell.
I’ve got kids. I’m in love. I cannot and will not go down that path.
And if this is true for me I know for certain that it’s true for
countless others as well. They’ve brutalized whistleblowers to the
point that it’s surely had a severe chilling effect on those who
would otherwise become key leak sources, and now they’re brutalizing
the journalists who publish those leaks as well.
The odds of someone
willing to blow the whistle on real power meeting a journalist who is
willing to help them are rapidly diminishing to zero.

They’re
winning this fight against Assange in brutal fashion to ensure that
they win all future fights as well.

Which
is why it’s absolutely stupid that this conversation so often gets
fixated on Assange the man, whether it’s smears or praise.

The
other day I published a 
massive
mega-article
 attacking
the major smears about Assange I’ve encountered. There are 27 of them
in total so far, and I’ll be adding more soon. This mountain of
smears exists because instead of paying attention to the
world-shaping dangers I just outlined which threaten to make it
impossible to oppose the leaders of the US-centralized empire who are
marching us towards 
either
extinction or dystopia
,
people are babbling about Assange’s personality, or whether or not he
cleaned up after his cat while at the embassy.

The
flip side of this is people who fixate on Assange as a hero, which
can of course help draw attention to his plight and therefore be of
some benefit, but ultimately that’s also missing the forest for the
trees.

This
is so very, very much bigger than Assange, and we need to oppose it
for reasons that are far, far more significant than the individual
characteristics of one man who, depending on what we’ve heard, we may
or may not believe is a nice person.

Never
lose sight of this: the intimidation of whistleblowers and leak
publishers threatens to stop truth from informing the behaviors of
our entire species, leaving only the whims of the most powerful to
decide our fate. The most powerful people are those most dedicated to
pursuing power, those sociopathic enough to step on anyone’s head and
do whatever it takes to secure as much control as possible over as
many humans as possible. That’s who we’re handing the steering wheel
of our world to if we allow truth to be intimidated into silence.

And
never lose sight of this, either: with the imprisonment and
prosecution of Julian Assange, these same sociopathic oppressors have
exposed themselves. They have ripped off the friendly Big Brother
mask and exposed the dark infernal entities which squirm and hiss
underneath. This sudden interest in the legal technicalities of bail
protocol and journalistic source protection protocol happen to look
exactly the same as prosecuting a journalist for publishing facts
because that is exactly what is happening. Don’t ever let anyone
gaslight you into believing otherwise, and don’t you dare miss this
rare opportunity to point out to your fellow humans how our
oppressors have revealed their true nature.

Everyone
has my 
unconditional
permission
 to
republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve
written) in any way they like free of charge. My work is 
entirely
reader-supported
,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, 
click
here
.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
April 22, 2019 at 2:09 am | Tags: 
assangechilling
effect
journalismprosecutionrevolutionwikileaks |
Categories: 
Article | 

URL: https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1F6

================================

*
Echte journalisten, dus niet die
van de reguliere media, van wie de journalisten braaf
herkauwen wat hun regering, grote bedrijven en de geheime diensten hen opdienen. Echte
journalisten die hun werk doen: het blootleggen van smerige misdaden,
of die nu worden begaan door bedrijven of door overheidsdienaren als
militairen, of zelfs het aangaan van illegale oorlogen door de VS…….. Zie wat dat laatste betreft eens wat de reguliere
media brachten in aanloop van en tijdens de illegale oorlogen die de
VS begon tegen landen als Afghanistan, Irak, Libië, Oekraïne en Syrië, als één blok stonden de reguliere westerse media achter deze
illegale oorlogen en inderdaad, men herkauwde braaf alle leugens gebracht door de VS
geheime diensten, de opvolgende VS regeringen, haar denktanks als Atlantic Council (denktanks waar
je zelfs het achterlijke HCSS toe kan rekenen) en haar NAVO partners….. Kortom deze reguliere media brachten op grote
schaal fake news (nepnieuws), desinformatie en manipuleerden daarmee
de westerse bevolkingen, waarbij zelfs het melden van massamoorden
begaan door de VS en haar NAVO partners, onder de pet werden (en
worden) gehouden……

Zie ook:

Russiagate: VS en buitenlandse geheime diensten hebben de VS presidentsverkiezingen in 2016 gemanipuleerd

Julian Assange (brekend nieuws) veroordeeld tot 50 weken gevangenisstraf……

VS Navy SEALs werden gewaarschuwd geen oorlogsmisdaden te melden

Jan Kuitenbrouwer (‘journalist’): Assange is een charlatan en WikiLeaks heeft beelden van de moord op 2 journalisten gemanipuleerd

Russiagate: nog overtuigd van bestaan daarvan? Lees dit!‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)

Chelsea Manning blijft voor onbepaalde tijd in de gevangenis

VN heeft eerder de ‘detentie’ van Assange al als onwettig verklaard

Julian Assange gearresteerd, een flagrante schending van de persvrijheid!

Arrestatie Julian Assange: een aanfluiting voor internationale regels en een enorme aanval op onafhankelijke journalistiek

Assange’s ‘Conspiracy’ to Expose War Crimes Has Already Been Punished

Assange Held at “Britain’s Guantanamo Bay” as UN Urges Fair Trial

The Arrest of Julian Assange is an Existential Threat to Journalism

Julian Assange, valse beschuldigingen, Big Brother en VS steun voor terrorisme

Westerse massamedia lopen aan de leiband van plutocraten, de neoliberale politiek en geheime diensten

Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega’s voor zot uitgemaakt

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

Julian Assange gedemoniseerd door media die hem zouden moeten steunen, waren ze bevolkt geweest door echte journalisten……..

WikiLeaks toont aan dat VS en GB een gezamenlijke gewelddadige en bedrieglijke buitenlandpolitiek voeren

De prijs op het hoofd van Julian Assange: 1 miljard dollar…..

Assange kan niet voor spionage worden vervolgd, immers hij is journalist >> aldus Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) in een video

Westerse bevolkingen worden bespeeld door regeringen, massamedia, grote bedrijven, financiële instellingen en geheime diensten……

Media tonen ware gezicht door weigering Julian Assange te verdedigen

Assange is journalist en zou alleen daarom al niet mogen worden vervolgd, een artikel o.a. voor de huidige ‘journalisten’ van de reguliere media en de gebruikers van die media

WhiteHouse: US, Ecuador Coordinating About Future Of Assange Asylum‘ 

Stop de isolatie van Julian Assange!’

JulianAssange (Wikileaks) haalt hypocriete Britse regering onderuit voor wijzen op belang van vrije en onafhankelijke media

VS waarschuwde regering van Zweden voor Wikileaks in aanloop verkiezingen, Assange ‘moest en zou hangen’, ofwel de zoveelste VS manipulatie van verkiezingen elders……

Facebook Removes Page of Ecuador’s Former President on Same Day as Assange’s Arrest

While US Media Play Along, Critics Warn Assange Indictment an ‘Obvious’ Ploy With Deeper Dangers

‘Negen redenen om het VS presidentschap in 2020 toe te kennen aan Joe Biden’

In
een uiterst sarcastisch en humoristisch artikel pleit Caitlin Johnstone op
haar site ‘voor het stemmen op Joe Biden’, een oorlogsmisdadiger en oud-vicepresident van de VS….. ‘Volgens Johnstone is er geen betere presidentskandidaat voor de Democratische Partij in 2020’, e.e.a. heeft Johnstone teruggebracht in een pleidooi van 9 punten.

Johnstone plaatste dit bericht op 4 april jl.

Lezen
mensen!

Nine
Reasons Why You Should Support Joe Biden For President

by Caitlin
Johnstone

Former
Vice President Joe Biden has 
released
a video statement
 telling
the American people that the 
accusations
he is now facing
 of
touching women in inappropriate ways without their consent is the
product of changing “social norms”, assuring everyone that
he will indeed be adjusting to those changes.

And
thank goodness. For a minute there, I was worried Biden might cave
under the pressure of a looming scandal and decline to run for
president on the grounds that it could cripple his campaign and leave
America facing another four years of Donald Trump. Here are nine good
reasons why I hope Joe Biden runs for president, and why you should
support him too:

1.
It’s his turn.

It’s
Biden’s turn to be president. He’s spent years playing second fiddle
while other leading Democrats hogged all the limelight, and that’s
not fair. He’s been waiting very patiently. Come on.

2.
Most Qualified Candidate Ever.

If
Joe Biden secures the Democratic Party nomination for president, he
would be the Most Qualified Candidate Ever to run for office. His
service as a US Senator and a Vice President has given him
unparalleled experience priming him for the most powerful elected
office in the world. Everything Biden has done throughout his entire
career proves that he’d make a great Commander-in-Chief.

3.
He’s closely associated with a popular Democratic president.

You
think Biden, you think Obama. You think Obama, you think greatness.
You can’t spend that much time with a great Democratic president
without absorbing his greatness yourself. It’s called osmosis.

4.
You liked Obama, didn’t you?

Biden
was part of the Obama administration. Remember the Obama
administration? It was magical, right? If you want more of that, vote
Biden.

5.
But Trump!

Do
you want Trump to win the next election? You know he’ll shatter all
our norms and literally end the world if he does, right? You should
be terrified of the possibility of Trump winning in 2020, and if you
are, you should want him running against Joe Biden. What’s the
alternative? Nominating some crazy unelectable socialist like Bernie
Sanders? Might as well just hand Trump the victory now, then. Anyone
who wants to beat Trump must fall in line behind the Most Qualified
Candidate Ever.

6.
Iraq wasn’t so bad.

Okay,
maybe some of his past foreign policy positions look bad in
hindsight, but come on. Pushing for the Iraq war was what everyone
was doing back in those days. It was all the rage. We all made it
through, right? I mean, most of us?

7.
This is happening whether you like it or not.

We’re
doing this. We’re going to push Joe Biden through whether you like it
or not, and we can do it the easy way or the hard way. Just relax,
take deep breaths, and think about a nice place far away from here.
Don’t struggle. This will be over before you know it. We’ll use
plenty of lube.

8.
Just vote for him.

Just
vote for him, you insolent little shits. Who the fuck do you think
you are, anyway? You think you’re entitled to a bunch of ponies and
unicorns like healthcare and drinkable water? You only think that
because you’re a bunch of racist, sexist homophobes. You will vote
for who we tell you to or we’ll spend the next four years calling you
all Russian agents and screaming about Susan Sarandon.

9.
Nothing could possibly go wrong.

Honestly,
what could possibly go wrong? It’s not like the Most Qualified
Candidate Ever could manage to lose an election to some oafish
reality TV star. Hell, Biden could beat Trump in his sleep. He could
even skip campaigning in Michigan, Wisconsin and Pennsylvania and
still win by a landslide, because those states are in the bag.
There’s no way he could fail, barring some unprecedented and
completely unforeseeable freak occurrences from way out of left field
that nobody could possibly have anticipated.

__________________

Thanks
for reading! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you
enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me
on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
April 3, 2019 at 11:45 pm |

Tags: 2020bidenHillarysatire |
Categories: 
Article |
URL: 
https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1CJ

Russiagate kritiek: Tulsi Gabbard (VS democratisch presidentskandidaat) gedemoniseerd door Democratische Partij en de massamedia

Naar
aanleiding van een Twitterbericht dat Tulsi Gabbard de wereld
instuurde en waarin zij stelt dat kortzichtige politici en hun hulp
in de massamedia, de laatste 2 jaar bezig zijn geweest Trump neer te
zetten als een marionet van Putin, schreef Caitlin Johnstone het hieronder opgenomen artikel….. 

Van Russiagate is intussen geen spaan meer heel, zoveel is wel duidelijk uit de rapportage van Mueller (die nog steeds niet helemaal openbaar is gemaakt), waar de hysterie over ‘Russische manipulaties’ ervoor hebben gezorgd dat de nieuwe koude oorlog verder is opgetuigd, met de daarmee gepaard gaande
peperdure wapenrace en inperking van de privacy, plus censuur op het internet…… Let wel die censuur en inperking van de privacy werden en worden doorgevoerd in zogenaamde westerse democratieën, terwijl dat soort maatregelen ‘thuishoren’ in een dictatuur…..

Gabbard
voegde aan haar Twitterbericht toe dat Trump er alles aan heeft gedaan niet langer te
worden gezien als marionet van Putin, juist door een veel harder
beleid tegen Rusland te voeren, waarbij hij zelfs de kans op een
kernoorlog niet uit de weg is gegaan en zo’n oorlog nog steeds niet uitsluit……

In het Twitterbericht van Gabbard is ‘geen woord Spaans’ opgenomen, bovendien een
waarheid als een koe! Echter de reacties op dit bericht waren niet
misselijk. Gabbard wordt figuurlijk afgemaakt door die massamedia,
politici en opiniemakers van diverse rechtse denktanks……. (de laatste zijn in de VS altijd rechts, ‘maar goed..’)

Zoals gezegd: Caitlin
Johnstone publiceerde op haar site het hieronder opgenomen artikel en
als conclusie stelt ze dat de welgestelden niet voor niets zoveel
geld steken in het beheren van de media, immers als je de
media beheerst, beheers je en regisseer je het denkbeeld dat bij het volk leeft…… 

Plutocraten beheersen de westerse: -media, -politici en -denktanks, zij hebben
belang bij de huidige inhumane neoliberale status quo, ja zelfs bij
de nieuwe koude oorlog en alle andere illegale oorlogen die de VS
voert, immers dit geteisem heeft veel aandelen in de wapenindustrie, waaronder ik
ook de fabrikanten reken die rollend, varend en vliegend
oorlogstuig produceren, een industrie die zoals je begrijpt baat heeft bij zoveel mogelijk oorlog en spanningen in de wereld……

Gezien
het voorgaande kan je dan ook stellen dat elke claim vals is die de VS maakt
als het weer een illegale oorlog voert, of als het een opstand dan
wel coup organiseert en regisseert, de claim dat dit is om democratie te
brengen en een bloedige dictator af te zetten…… In werkelijkheid heeft VS schijt aan democratie en bloedige
dictators, zolang het bewuste land maar de hielen van de VS likt, VS bedrijven toelaat en
in de VS grote ‘defensie orders’ plaatst…. Sterker nog: de VS steunt een aantal dictators, niet in de laatste plaats de reli-fascistische dictaturen van het Midden-Oosten…. (Saoedi-Arabië, de Verenigde Arabische Emiraten >> VAE, Egypte en buiten het Midden-Oosten: Marokko)

Intussen is bekend dat Mueller de hele Russiagate leugen heeft afgeschoten, daar er geen bewijs voor is te vinden….. Met Russiagate werd zoals gezegd niet alleen de vrijheid van meningsuiting zwaar geweld aangedaan middels censuur op het internet, maar werd ook de Koude Oorlog 2.0 opgetuigd….. 

Aan het voorgaande hebben de reguliere media grote steun verleend, met een enorme berg aan fake news (nepnieuws), waarvoor deze media niet worden gestraft middels de al eerder genoemde censuur, hoewel de bewijzen daarvoor letterlijk voor het oprapen liggen…… Waar sociale media die aantoonbaar echt nieuws brengen, worden afgemaakt in die reguliere westerse media en door de westerse politiek en ze worden geblokkeerd op Facebook en Twitter……..

Responses
To This Tweet Show How People Fixate On Narrative Over Fact

Go to the profile of Caitlin Johnstone

by Caitlin
Johnstone

Last
month I 
published
an essay
 about
the importance of understanding the difference between fact and
narrative, and I just want to quickly highlight a perfect
illustration of this importance in a controversy arising from
recent
Tulsi Gabbard tweet
.
The tweet reads as follows:

“Short-sighted
politicians & media pundits who’ve spent last 2 years accusing
Trump as a Putin puppet have brought us the expensive new Cold War &
arms race. How? Because Trump now does everything he can to prove
he’s not Putin’s puppet—even if it brings us closer to nuclear
war.”

Now,
all the facts say that Gabbard’s claim that Trump has been bringing
the world closer to nuclear war with Russia is indisputably true. It
is perhaps possible to dispute the notion that Trump has escalated
tensions with Russia to try and “prove he’s not Putin’s
puppet”; maybe an argument could be made that he’s simply
reckless and violent or that he’s particularly beholden to cold war
profiteers, or that despite all his rhetoric he just really, really
hates Russia for some reason. But it is absolutely not disputable
that Trump has greatly escalated tensions with a nuclear superpower
by implementing a Nuclear Posture


Review
with a 
much
more aggressive stance against Russia
withdrawing
from the INF treaty
,
bombing and illegally occupying Syria, arming Ukraine, staging a coup
in Venezuela, and 
many,
many other hawkish actions
 taken
against the interests of the Russian Federation which his predecessor
Obama never dared to take.

Moon of Alabama@MoonofA

New on MoA:
Putin Asks And Trump Delivers –
A List Of All The Good Things Trump Did For Russiahttps://www.moonofalabama.org/2019/01/putin-asks-and-trump-delivers-here-is-a-list-of-all-the-good-things-trump-did-for-russia.html 

270

8:15 PM – Jan 15, 2019

These
facts are all well documented in the mainstream press and are
entirely beyond dispute. The facts say that Donald Trump has
escalated nuclear tensions with Russia more than any other president
since the fall of the Berlin Wall. But if you 
go
to Gabbard’s tweet
 and
read the responses right now, you’ll find thousands and thousands of

Democratic
establishment loyalists calling her a liar for saying so.

“Gabbard
staking out a bold ‘Trump is *too* tough on Putin’ lane in the
Democratic primary,” 
tweeted former
NSA attorney Susan Hennessey of CNN and the Brookings Institution.
“As predictable as it is absurd.”

“Tulsi
Gabbard’s is the only Twitter account other than Trump’s that I
routinely have to check to make sure it’s actually hers, because
the tweet is so absurdly ridiculous,” 
tweeted #Resistance
pundit John Aravosis. “Now she’s defending Trump on Russia.
Why is she a Democrat? And she’s actually using Kremlin
talking points (nuclear war!). Unbelievable.”

“Tulsi,
you aren’t the first American politician to cozy up to foreign
dictators and to serve as a Putin mouthpiece,” 
tweeted former
CIA officer Evan McMullin. “While you, Putin and Trump fear
monger about nuclear war, we’ll protect our democracy and hold
corrupted politicians accountable.”

Susan Hennessey
@Susan_Hennessey

Tulsi Gabbard
@TulsiGabbard

Short-sighted politicians & media pundits who’ve spent last 2 years accusing Trump as a Putin puppet have brought us the expensive new Cold War & arms race. How? Because Trump now does everything he can to prove he’s not Putin’s puppet—even if it brings us closer to nuclear war.

4,214

12:45 PM – Mar 17, 2019


There
are many, many more, but you get the picture. The deluge of responses
to Gabbard’s undeniably true statement about Trump’s dangerous
escalations against a nuclear superpower are largely predicated on
two assumptions: (1) that Trump has not in fact made the escalations
that he has made, and (2) that the danger of nuclear war is not a
real or significant thing. These are both, obviously, bat shit
insane.

The
primary risk of nuclear war is not that one will be planned out and
deliberately started in an attempt to win, but that a warhead will be
deployed amid the chaos of escalating tensions as a result of
miscommunication, misunderstanding or technical failure, as nearly
happened 
on
more than one occasion
 during
the last cold war. Once one nuclear weapon has been deployed in an
already tense situation, it’s unlikely that the full arsenals of both
sides won’t be unleashed upon each other. As journalist Glenn
Greenwald 
pointed
out
 in
response to the uproar over Gabbard’s tweet, “The Bulletin of
Atomic Scientists’ doomsday clock is at 
2
minutes before midnight
.
By far its two greatest threats to *humanity’s existence* are climate
change & US/Russia nuclear war. Yes, how crazy and treasonous to
want to avoid ratcheting up tensions.”

The
US and Russia are 
by
an immensely wide margin
 the
two biggest nuclear powers on the planet, which makes for a lot of
small, unpredictable moving parts with mounting tensions steadily
increasing the probability of something going catastrophically wrong.


Dismissing
a congresswoman’s attempt to point at this potentially world-ending
risk as a “Kremlin talking point” is about the stupidest,
craziest thing that a human brain could possibly come up with.

And
yet here we are.

Ploughshares Fund
@plough_shares

There are still more than 14,000 nuclear weapons left on the planet. Join us in reducing and eliminating nuclear threats today https://www.ploughshares.org/world-nuclear-stockpile-report 

11

10:33 PM – Sep 4, 2018

World Nuclear Weapon Stockpile

Twenty-nine years after the end of the Cold War, the world’s combined stockpiles of nuclear weapons remain at unacceptably high levels.

ploughshares.org


So
what’s up with that? Why is an indisputably true claim about an
indisputably real danger being treated as a lie by Democratic Party
loyalists, even though it attacks the same president they themselves
claim to oppose?

The
answer is because it doesn’t fit the narrative. A consensus has been
built over the last two years that Trump is a Kremlin puppet, so the
indisputable fact that his administration is endangering the life of
every organism on this planet by escalating tensions with Russia
looks like a lie against that backdrop. The facts say one thing, the
narrative says another, and they go with the narrative. For most
people, narrative takes precedence over fact.

And
what’s interesting is that these same facts could have remained
exactly as they are and allowed the exact opposite narrative to be
constructed. If her plutocratic owners had wished it, Rachel Maddow
would have spent every night over the last two years warning everyone
that Donald Trump is taking dangerous actions against Russia that
threaten to wipe all life off the face of the earth, and it would
have worked. If Trump had continued making these escalations in our
hypothetical alternate timeline while the mass media was constantly
selling the “Trump’s going to get us all killed in a nuclear war
with Russia” narrative, all the same blue-checkmarked Twitter
pundits you see yelling at Tulsi Gabbard today would be yelling about
the dangers of nuclear war in our alternate timeline.

Narrative
really is that powerful. You see it in the behavior of social media
users, you see it in the behavior of governments, you see it in
religions, and you see it in abusive relationships which continue
because of the narrative “He’s a good guy underneath it all and
he really loves me” even though the facts say “He beats you
and cheats on you all the time.” If you can control the stories
that people tell themselves about a given situation, then you control
those people on all matters pertaining to that situation. Regardless
of facts.

Which
is why the plutocratic class funnels so much money into buying up
media influence, funding think tanks, and other means of narrative
control: if you can control the narrative, no amount of facts will
deter the mainstream public from going along with your agendas. This
is why the behaviors of governments so consistently move in alignment
with the interests of this same media-buying, think tank-funding,
politician-owning plutocratic class. Whoever controls the narrative
controls the world.

_________________________

Thanks
for reading! My articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you
enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me
on
 Facebook,
following my antics on
 Twitter, throwing
some money into my hat on 
Patreon or Paypalpurchasing
some of my 
sweet
merchandise
, buying
my new book 
Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
,
or my previous book 
Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
.
The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see
the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for
my 
website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish.

Bitcoin
donations:1Ac7PCQXoQoLA9Sh8fhAgiU3PHA2EX5Zm2

Caitlin
Johnstone
 |
March 18, 2019 at 10:50 pm | Tags: 
#Trumpcold
war
PoliticsRussiaTulsi
Gabbard
tweet |
Categories: 
Article |

URL: https://wp.me/p9tj6M-1Bd

==================================

Zie wat betreft de Nederlandse valse profeet van Russiagate, D66 leeghoofd Ollongren:

Kasja Ollongren (D66 minister) en de Russische manipulatie van de Provinciale Statenverkiezingen
Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren (D66 minister) schiet een levensgrote bok met fake news show

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

Zie verder: 

Russiagate gelovigen krijgen nieuwe klap: WikiLeaks kreeg de DNC mails van een klokkenluider, niet van Rusland…..‘ (zie ook de links naar de ‘jongste berichten’ over ‘Russische manipulatie’ in dat bericht)

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!

Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

‘Fake News’ misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax‘ (Russiagate, de enorme leugen op basis waaraan we de huidige censuurgolf te danken hebben……)

Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift…..

‘Russiagate’: Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou

The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media

The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen……

‘Russiagate’ een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten…….

VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein…..

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering‘ (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er ‘metersdikke’ dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikeLeaks)