‘Russiagate’: Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou

Altijd
leuk om weer een bevestiging tegen te komen over de leugen dat
Rusland de presidentsverkiezingen in de VS heeft beïnvloed t.g.v.
Donald Trump, de ‘lichtelijk’ imbeciele psychopaat.

Er
kunnen niet genoeg van deze berichten verschijnen, zeker als je dag
in dag uit westerse ‘journalisten’, politici en ‘deskundigen’ de leugen hoort
herhalen dat de Russen wel degelijk deze verkiezingen hebben
gemanipuleerd, iets waarvoor tot op heden geen flinter bewijs is
geleverd….. Zoals er ook geen nanometer bewijs is voor Russische bemoeienis met de Brexit, de roep om onafhankelijkheid in Catalonië of verkiezingen in de EU, terwijl ook dat bijna dagelijks de revue passeert……

Lees
het hieronder opgenomen artikel en verbaas je ook over het gemak
waarmee de wereld werd en nog steeds wordt voorgelogen met een zo
doorzichtig aantal leugens….. In deze geopenbaard door Jack
Matlock, een voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou. Hij stelt o.a. dat de aanname dat de VS inlichtingendiensten achter deze leugens staan, op zich al een leugen van formaat is en dat het zogenaamde inlichtingen rapport vooral politiek gemotiveerd is (o.a. om Hillary Clinton uit de wind te houden en de winst van Trump bij de presidentsverkiezingen ter discussie te stellen, Ap):

Former
US Ambassador: Intel Report on Russian Interference “Politically
Motivated”

July
3, 2018 at 10:53 pm

Written
by 
Consortium
News

Prominent
journalists and politicians seized upon a shabby, politically
motivated, “intelligence” report as proof of “Russian
interference” in the U.S. election without the pretense of due
diligence, argues Jack Matlock, a former U.S. ambassador in Moscow.

(CN Op-ed) — Did
the U.S. “intelligence community” judge that Russia interfered in
the 2016 presidential election?

Most
commentators seem to think so. Every news report I have read of the
planned meeting of Presidents Trump and Putin in July refers to
“Russian interference” as a fact and asks whether the matter will
be discussed. Reports that President Putin denied involvement in the
election are scoffed at, usually with a claim that the U.S.
“intelligence community” proved Russian interference. In fact,
the U.S. “intelligence community” has not done so. The
intelligence community as a whole has not been tasked to make a
judgment and some key members of that community did not participate
in the report that is routinely cited as “proof” of “Russian
interference.”

I
spent the 35 years of my government service with a “top secret”
clearance.
 When
I reached the rank of ambassador and also worked as Special Assistant
to the President for National Security, I also had clearances for
“codeword” material. At that time, intelligence reports to the
president relating to Soviet and European affairs were routed through
me for comment. I developed at that time a “feel” for the
strengths and weaknesses of the various American intelligence
agencies. It is with that background that I read the January 6,
2017 
report of
three intelligence agencies: the CIA, FBI, and NSA.

This
report is labeled “Intelligence Community Assessment,” but in
fact 
it
is not that
.
A report of the intelligence community in my day would include the
input of all the relevant intelligence agencies and would reveal
whether all agreed with the conclusions. Individual agencies did not
hesitate to “take a footnote” or explain their position if they
disagreed with a particular assessment. A report would not claim to
be that of the “intelligence community” if any relevant agency
was omitted.

The
report states that it represents the findings of three intelligence
agencies: CIA, FBI, and NSA, but 
even
that is misleading
 in
that it implies that there was a consensus of relevant analysts in
these three agencies. In fact, the report was prepared by a group of
analysts from the three agencies pre-selected by their directors,
with the selection process generally overseen by James Clapper, then
Director of National Intelligence (DNI). Clapper told the Senate in
testimony May 8, 2017, that it was prepared by “two dozen or so
analysts—hand-picked, seasoned experts from each of the
contributing agencies.” If you can hand-pick the analysts, you can
hand-pick the conclusions. The analysts selected would have
understood what Director Clapper wanted since he made no secret of
his views. Why would they endanger their careers by not delivering?

What
should have struck any congressperson or reporter was that the
procedure Clapper followed was the same as that used in 2003 to
produce the report falsely claiming that Saddam Hussein had retained
stocks of weapons of mass destruction. That should be worrisome
enough to inspire questions, but that is not the only anomaly.

The
DNI has under his aegis a National Intelligence Council (NIC) whose
officers can call any intelligence agency with relevant expertise to
draft community assessments. It was created by Congress after 9/11
specifically to correct some of the flaws in intelligence collection
revealed by 9/11. Director Clapper chose not to call on the NIC,
which is curious since its duty is “to act as a bridge between the
intelligence and policy communities.”

Unusual
FBI Participation

During
my time in government, a judgment regarding national security would
include reports from, as a minimum, the CIA, the Defense Intelligence
Agency (DIA), and the Bureau of Intelligence and Research (INR) of
the State Department. The FBI was rarely, if ever, included unless
the principal question concerned law enforcement within the United
States. NSA might have provided some of the intelligence used by the
other agencies but normally did not express an opinion regarding the
substance of reports.

What
did I notice when I read the January report? There was no mention of
INR or DIA! The exclusion of DIA might be understandable since its
mandate deals primarily with military forces, except that the report
attributes some of the Russian activity to the GRU, Russian military
intelligence. DIA, the Defense Intelligence Agency, is the U.S.
intelligence organ most expert on the GRU. Did it concur with this
attribution? The report doesn’t say.

The
omission of INR is more glaring since a report on foreign political
activity could not have been that of the U.S. intelligence community
without its participation. After all, when it comes to assessments of
foreign intentions and foreign political activity, the State
Department’s intelligence service is by far the most knowledgeable
and competent. In my day, it reported accurately on Gorbachev’s
reforms when the CIA leaders were advising that Gorbachev had the
same aims as his predecessors.

This
is where due diligence comes in. The first question responsible
journalists and politicians should have asked is “Why is INR not
represented? Does it have a different opinion? If so, what is that
opinion? Most likely the official answer would have been that this is
“classified information.” But why should it be classified? If
some agency heads come to a conclusion and choose (or are directed)
to announce it publicly, doesn’t the public deserve to know that
one of the key agencies has a different opinion?

The
second question should have been directed at the CIA, NSA, and FBI:
did all their analysts agree with these conclusions or were they
divided in their conclusions? What was the reason behind hand-picking
analysts and departing from the customary practice of enlisting
analysts already in place and already responsible for following the
issues involved?

State
Department Intel Silenced

As
I was recently informed by a senior official, 
the
State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence Research did, in fact,
have a different opinion but was not allowed to express it
.
So the January report was not one of the “intelligence community,”
but rather of three intelligence agencies, two of which have no
responsibility or necessarily any competence to judge foreign
intentions. The job of the FBI is to enforce federal law. The job of
NSA is to intercept the communications of others and to protect ours.
It is not staffed to assess the content of what is intercepted; that
task is assumed by others, particularly the CIA, the DIA (if it is
military) or the State Department’s INR (if it is political).

The
second thing to remember is that reports of the intelligence agencies
reflect the views of the heads of the agencies and are not
necessarily a consensus of their analysts’ views. The heads of both
the CIA and FBI are political appointments, while the NSA chief is a
military officer; his agency is a collector of intelligence rather
than an analyst of its import, except in the fields of cryptography
and communications security.

One
striking thing about the press coverage and Congressional discussion
of the January report, and of subsequent statements by CIA, FBI, and
NSA heads is that questions were never posed regarding the position
of the State Department’s INR, or whether the analysts in the
agencies cited were in total agreement with the conclusions.

Let’s
put these questions aside for the moment and look at the report
itself. On the first page of text, the following statement leapt to
my attention:

We
did not make an assessment of the impact that Russian activities had
on the outcome of the 2016 election. The US Intelligence Community is
charged with monitoring and assessing the intentions, capabilities,
and actions of foreign actors; it does not analyze US political
processes or US public opinion.”

Now,
how can one judge whether activity “interfered” with an election
without assessing its impact? After all, if the activity had no
impact on the outcome of the election, it could not be properly
termed interference. This disclaimer, however, has not prevented
journalists and politicians from citing the report as proof that
“Russia interfered” in the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

As
for particulars, the report is full of assertion, innuendo, and
description of “capabilities” but largely devoid of any evidence
to substantiate its assertions. This is “explained” by claiming
that much of the evidence is classified and cannot be disclosed
without revealing sources and methods. The assertions are made with
“high confidence” or occasionally, “moderate confidence.”
Having read many intelligence reports I can tell you that if there is
irrefutable evidence of something it will be stated as a fact. The
use of the term “high confidence” is what most normal people
would call “our best guess.” “Moderate confidence” means
“some of our analysts think this might be true.”

Guccifer
2.0: A Fabrication

Among
the assertions are that a persona calling itself “Guccifer 2.0”
is an instrument of the GRU, and that it hacked the emails on the
Democratic National Committee’s (DNC) computer and conveyed them to
Wikileaks. What the report does not explain is that it is easy for a
hacker or foreign intelligence service to leave a false trail. In
fact, a program developed by CIA with NSA assistance to do just that
has been leaked and published*.

Retired
senior NSA technical experts have examined the “Guccifer 2.0”
data on the web and have concluded that “Guccifer 2.0’s” data
did not involve a hack across the web but was locally downloaded.
Further, the data had been tampered with and manipulated, leading to
the conclusion that “Guccifer 2.0” is a total fabrication.

The
report’s assertions regarding the supply of the DNC emails to
Wikileaks are dubious, but its final statement in this regard is
important: 
Disclosures
through WikiLeaks did not contain any evident forgeries.” 
 In
other words, what was disclosed was the truth! So, Russians are
accused of “degrading our democracy” by revealing that the DNC
was trying to fix the nomination of a particular candidate rather
than allowing the primaries and state caucuses to run their course. I
had always thought that transparency is consistent with democratic
values. Apparently those who think that the truth can degrade
democracy have a rather bizarre—to put it mildly–concept of
democracy.

Most
people, hearing that it is a “fact” that “Russia” interfered
in our election must think that Russian government agents hacked into
vote counting machines and switched votes to favor a particular
candidate. This, indeed, would be scary, and would justify the most
painful sanctions. But this is the one thing that the “intelligence”
report of January 6, 2017, states did not happen. Here is what it
said: “
DHS
[the Department of Homeland Security] assesses that the types of
systems Russian actors targeted or compromised were not involved in
vote tallying
.”

This
is an important statement by an agency that is empowered to assess
the impact of foreign activity on the United States. Why was it not
consulted regarding other aspects of the study? Or—was it in fact
consulted and refused to endorse the findings? Another obvious
question any responsible journalist or competent politician should
have asked.

Prominent
American journalists and politicians seized upon this shabby,
politically motivated, report as proof of “Russian interference”
in the U.S. election without even the pretense of due diligence. They
have objectively acted as co-conspirators in an effort to block any
improvement in relations with Russia, even though cooperation with
Russia to deal with common dangers is vital to both countries.

This
is only part of the story of how, without good reason, U.S.-Russian
relations have become dangerously confrontational. God willin and the
crick don’t rise, I’ll be musing about other aspects soon.

Op-ed
by 
Jack
Matlock
 /
Republished with permission / 
Consortium
News
 / Report
a typo

* De WikiLeaks Vault 7 en 8 documenten.

Zie wat betreft verkiezingen in de VS ook:

Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

Trump (Republikeinen) wint de midterm verkiezingen, alsook de Democraten, het verschil voor mensen elders in de wereld, die onder VS terreur moeten leven, is nul komma nada…….

Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen‘ (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax

Russische inmenging VS presidentsverkiezingen? ha! ha! ha! ha! Sheldon Adelson en Netanyahu zal men bedoelen!

De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift…..

Zie verder:

VS heeft Rusland al 3 keer met oorlog gedreigd, de laatste 2 keer in de afgelopen 1,5 week……

Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media

The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen……

‘Russiagate’ een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten…….

VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein…..

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering‘ (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er ‘metersdikke’ dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikeLeaks)

Zie ook het volgende artikel daterend van 26 oktober 2017: ‘‘Death Sentence for Local Media’: Warnings as FCC Pushes Change to Benefit Right-Wing Media Giant‘ Met o.a.:“At a time when broadcast conglomerates like Sinclair are gobbling up new stations and pulling media resources out of marginalized communities, we still need the main studio rule to help connect broadcasters to the local viewers and listeners they’re supposed to serve.” Dana Floberg, Free Press. Vergeet niet dat bijvoorbeeld de lokale dagbladen in ons land intussen zo ongeveer allemaal zijn ondergebracht bij de grote dagbladen, allen in bezit van op winst beluste eigenaren, dan wel (beursgenoteerde) politiek rechtse organisaties, die een eigen belang hebben bij voor hen gunstig gekleurde berichtgeving in de bladen die zij onder het beheer hebben, waarbij deze eigenaren allen grote aanhangers zijn van het ijskoude, inhumane neoliberalisme en grote voorstanders zijn van de VS terreur, waar ter wereld die ook wordt uitgeoefend……..


GRU in Nederlands GROe, label veranderd op 5 oktober 2018.

Assange is journalist en zou alleen daarom al niet mogen worden vervolgd, een artikel o.a. voor de huidige ‘journalisten’ van de reguliere media en de gebruikers van die media

Vorige
week werden er wereldwijd pro-Assange demonstraties gehouden die gewijd waren aan de hachelijke situatie waarin
Julian Assange zich bevindt, in feite gevangen in de Ecuadoraanse
ambassade in Londen, dit daar hij onmiddellijk zal worden
gearresteerd als hij zich buiten de deur waagt (de ambassade wordt 24
uur per dag in de gaten gehouden door meerdere agenten, wat intussen
al een godsvermogen moet hebben gekost…)…..

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

Als
Groot-Brittannië hem uitlevert, wacht Assange naar grote
waarschijnlijkheid een levenslange gevangenisstraf, de straf die hem
maximaal kan worden opgelegd, gezien de situatie in de VS
 
is
het inderdaad zeer waarschijnlijk dat deze straf hem daadwerkelijk zal worden
opgelegd…..

Straf
voor het uitvoeren van zijn taak als journalist, het controleren van
de overheid en dat in de breedste zin van het woord…. Door
WikiLeaks hebben klokkenluiders in de VS een medium gekregen waar
zij, na hun meestal al meerdere malen tevergeefs gedane pogingen om een eind te maken aan misstanden die zij tijdens hun werk tegenkomen, deze zaken (of zaak) openbaar te maken. 


Misstanden waar ofwel hun meerderen geen belangstelling voor hebben, daar dit hun positie in gevaar zou kunnen brengen, dan wel dat hen door die meerderen te verstaan wordt gegeven de mond te houden, daar hen anders ontslag en/of een rechtszaak wacht…….. Natuurlijk zijn er voldoende klokkenluiders die weten dat de enige mogelijkheid is anoniem een zaak direct in de media te brengen, daar overleg met meerderen over een misstand op zeker tot ontslag zal leiden…..

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

In
feite is de zaak tegen Assange een zaak tegen alle overheidsdienaren
die met grote regelmaat fikse misstanden zien en tegen alle
journalisten die nog wel hun werk doen zoals dat bedoeld is voor die functie….
Lullig genoeg zijn dat niet de journalisten van de reguliere media,
die ofwel gevangen zitten in het harnas van de overheid, ‘journalisten’ van de zogenaamde publieke omroepen en de ‘journalisten’ van de andere
media die in het bezit zijn van welgestelde personen (zoals hufter Murdoch), dan wel grote
mediabedrijven die aan de beurs genoteerd staan en die geen belang
hebben bij kritiek op de overheid of het bedrijfsleven, beter gezegd
die er geen belang bij hebben dat bijvoorbeeld het inhumane, ijskoude
neoliberalisme wordt bekritiseerd (met feiten!)……….

In
Nederland hebben we het vermaledijde klokkenluidershuis, en dat is verworden tot één grot
fiasco, waar dit huis zelfs na 2 jaar niet één zaak heeft afgerond, laat staan dat er zaken openbaar werden gemaakt…… (waardoor misstanden blijven bestaan…) Het smerige aan dit
klokkenluidershuis is dat mensen die zich aangemeld hebben, met
niemand, zelfs niet met huisgenoten of familie mogen praten over deze
zaak…… Terwijl klokkenluiders meestal al een paar jaar hebben
gewacht voor zij zaken in de openbaarheid willen brengen, of ze zijn met de kop tegen de muur gelopen bij hun
directie of leiding en er derhalve alle belang bij hebben dat hun zaak juist snel in de
openbaarheid komt, dit (nogmaals) om een eind te maken aan misstanden, ze zijn immers niet voor niets klokkenluider……….

Uiteraard
is de democratie gebaat bij een site als WikiLeaks, het is juist in
ons aller belang dat bijvoorbeeld corruptie en dergelijke zaken aan
het licht komen, zodat er een eind aan die corruptie kan worden
gemaakt…… Het lullige is dat het overgrote deel van de westerse
politici bijna dagelijks de mond vol hebben over bestrijding van
corruptie en voorheen over transparantie, maar er in werkelijkheid niets aan willen doen en zaken zo gesloten mogelijk willen houden….. (waar nog opgemerkt dient te worden dat het woord ‘transparantie’ in tegenstelling tot een paar jaar geleden nog maar zelden wordt gebruikt door die politici….)

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

Het
overgrote deel van de reguliere (massa-) media die berichtten over WikiLeaks en over Assange toen hij net in de Ecuadoraanse ambassade was gevlucht, spraken de VS overheden na, vooral de ‘uiterst betrouwbare’, CIA….. Waar deze terreurorganisatie stelde dat er
uiterst gevaarlijke informatie was gelekt en dat daardoor honderden
zo niet duizenden mensen in gevaar zouden zijn gekomen….. 


Deze
media deden niet eens moeite de gelekte documenten te lezen en te zien
of de CIA en de VS regering wel de waarheid spreken…. Zeker gezien het feit dat de CIA heel vaak liegt, wat ook geldt voor de regering van de VS, nu de Trump administratie. Nee, voor de reguliere westerse media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici geldt dat de staat en de CIA hebben gesproken, dus ‘klaar en waar……’

Het
is dan ook ronduit een schande dat zogenaamde journalisten meehuilen
in het meer dan valse CIA koor…….

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

Lees
het volgende artikel van Kevin Zeese en Margaret Flowers, die nog
veel dieper op de zaak ingaan en zegt het voort, het is de hoogste
tijd dat liegende politici en media aan de paal worden
genageld voor al hun leugens, smerige spelletjes en het belazeren van het volk respectievelijk de gebruikers van de reguliere media…………

Assange
Is a Journalist, Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

by Kevin
B. Zeese
 and Margaret
Flowers

June 29, 2018

Last
week, rallies in support of Julian Assange were held around the
world. We participated in two #AssangeUnity events seeking to
#FreeAssange in Washington, DC.

This
is the beginning of a new phase of the campaign to stop the
persecution of Julian Assange and allow him to leave the Ecuadorian
Embassy in London without the threat of being arrested in the UK or
facing prosecution by the United States.


The
Assange Case Is a Linchpin for Freedom of the Press and Freedom of
Information in the 21st Century

The
threat of prosecution against Julian Assange for his work as
editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks will be a key to defining what Freedom
of the Press means in the 21st Century. Should people be allowed to
know the truth if their government is corrupt, violating the law or
committing war crimes? Democracy cannot exist when people are misled
by a concentrated corporate media that puts forth a narrative on
behalf of the government and big business.

This
is not the first time that prosecution of a journalist will define
Freedom of the Press. Indeed, the roots of Freedom of the Press in
the United States go back to 
the
prosecution of John Peter Zenger,
 a
publisher who was accused of libel in 1734 for publishing articles
critical of the British royal governor, William Cosby. Zenger was
held in prison for eight months awaiting trial. In the trial, his
defense took its case directly to the jury.

For
five hundred years, 
Britain
had made it illegal to publish “any slanderous News”
 that
may cause “discord” between the king and his people. Zenger’s
defense argued that he had published the truth about Cosby and
therefore did not commit a crime. His lawyer “argued that telling
the truth did not cause governments to fall. Rather, he argued,
‘abuse of power’ caused governments to fall.” The jury heard
the argument, recessed and in ten minutes returned with a not guilty
verdict.

The
same issue is presented by Julian Assange — publishing the truth is
not a crime. WikiLeaks, with Assange as its editor and publisher,
redefined reporting in the 21st Century by 
giving
people the ability to be whistleblowers to reveal the abuses of
government and big business
.
People anonymously send documents to WikiLeaks via the Internet and
then after reviewing and authenticating them, WikiLeaks publishes
them. The documents sometimes reveal serious crimes, which has
resulted in Assange being threatened with a secret indictment for
espionage that could keep him incarcerated for the rest of his life.

This
puts the Assange case at 
the
forefront of 21st Century journalism
 as
he is democratizing the media by giving people the power to know the
truth not reported, or falsely reported, by the corporate media.
Breaking elite control over the media narrative is a serious threat
to their power because information is power. And, with the internet
and the ability of every person to act as a media outlet through
social and independent media, control of the narrative is moving
toward the people.

WikiLeaks
is filling a void with 
trust
in the corporate media at record lows
.
A recent Gallup Poll found 
only
32% trust the media
.
There has been a significant 
drop
in newspaper circulation and revenue
,
an 
ongoing
decline since 1980
.
Also, 
fewer
people rely on television for news.

In
this environment, the Internet-based news is becoming more dominant
and WikiLeaks is a particular threat to media monopolization by the
elites. Research is showing that 
independent
and social media are having an impact on people’s opinions
.

The
threats to Julian Assange are occurring when 
dissent
is under attack
,
particularly 
media
dissent;
 the FBI
has a task force to monitor social media
.
The attack on 
net
neutrality
Google using algorithms to prevent
searches
 for alternative
media
 and Facebook controlling the
what people see
 are
all part of the attack on the democratized media.


The
Astounding Impact of WikiLeaks’ Reporting

The
list of WikiLeaks’ revelations 
has
become astounding
.
The release of 
emails
from Hillary Clinton
her
presidential campaign
,
and the 
Democratic
National Committee
 had
a major impact on the election. People saw the truth of 
Clinton’s
connections to Wall Street
,
her 
two-faced
politics
 of
having a public view and a private view as well as the 
DNC’s
efforts to undermine the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders
.
People saw the truth and the truth hurt Hillary Clinton and the
Democrats.

Among
the most famous documents published were those provided by Chelsea
Manning on 
IraqAfghanistan,
the 
Guantanamo
Prison
 and
the 
US
State Department
.
The 
Collateral
Murder
 video
among the Manning Iraq war documents shows US soldiers in an Apache
helicopter gunning down a group of innocent men, including two
Reuters employees, a photojournalist, and his driver, killing 16 and
wounding two children. Millions have viewed the video showing that
when a van pulled up to evacuate the wounded, the 
soldiers
again opened fire
.
A soldier says, “Oh yeah, look at those dead bastards.”

Other
significant intelligence leaks followed, i.e., 
Vault
7
,
documents on the Central Intelligence Agency’s activities,
and 
Vault
8,
 which
included source code on CIA malware activities.

WikiLeaks
has also published documents on other countries, e.g. WikiLeaks
published a series of 
documents
on Russian spying
WikiLeaks
has been credited by many with helping to spark the Tunisian
Revolution
 which
led to the Arab Spring, e.g., showing the widespread 
corruption
of the 23-year rule of the Ben Ali
Foreign
Policy
 reported
 that
“the candor of the cables released by WikiLeaks did more for Arab
democracy than decades of backstage U.S. diplomacy.” 
WikiLeaks’
publications 
provided
democracy activists in Egypt with information needed to spark
protests and 
provided
background
 that
explained the Egyptian uprising. Traditional media publications
like 
the New
York Times
 relied
on WikiLeaks
 to
analyze the causes of the uprising.

WikiLeaks
informed the Bahrain public about their government’s cozy
relationship with the US, describing a 
$5
billion joint-venture with Occidental Petroleum
 and $300
million in US military sales
 and
how the 
US
Navy is the foundation
 of
Bahrain’s national security.

John
Pilger describes WikiLeaks’ documents, writing
,
“No investigative journalism in my lifetime can equal the
importance of what WikiLeaks has done in calling rapacious power to
account.”


Assange
Character Assassination And Embassy Imprisonment

Julian
Assange made powerful enemies in governments around the world,
corporate media, and big business because he burst false narratives
with the truth. As a result, governments fought back, including the
United States, Great Britain, and Sweden, which has led to Assange
being trapped in the embassy of Ecuador in London for six years.

The
root of the incarceration were allegations in Sweden. Sweden’s
charges against Assange were 
initially
dropped
 by
the chief prosecutor, 
two
weeks later they found a prosecutor
 to
pursue a rape investigation. One of the women had 
CIA
connections 
and
bragged about her relationship with Assange in 
tweets
she tried to erase. She even 
published a
7-step program for legal revenge against lovers. The 
actions
of the women do not seem to show rape
 or
any kind of abuse. One woman held a party with him after the
encounter and another went out to eat with him. In November
2016, 
Assange
was interviewed by Swedish prosecutors
 for
four hours at the Ecuadorian embassy. In December 2016, Assange
published 
tweets
showing his innocence and the sex was consensual
.
Without making a statement on Assange’s guilt, the 
Swedish
investigators dropped the charges
 in
May 2017. The statute of limitations for Swedish charges will be up
in 2020.

As John
Pilger pointed out,
 “Katrin
Axelsson and Lisa Longstaff of Women Against Rape summed it up when
they wrote, ‘The allegations against [Assange] are a smokescreen
behind which a number of governments are trying to clamp down on
WikiLeaks for having audaciously revealed to the public their secret
planning of wars and occupations with their attendant rape, murder,
and destruction… The authorities care so little about violence
against women that they manipulate rape allegations at will.’”

Assange
is still trapped in the embassy as he 
would
be arrested for violating his bail six years ago
.
But, the real threat to Assange is the possibility of a secret
indictment against him in the United States for espionage. US and
British officials have refused to tell Assange’s lawyers whether
there was a sealed indictment or a sealed extradition order against
him. Former CIA Director, now Secretary of State, Mike 
Pompeo
has described WikiLeaks as a non-state hostile intelligence
service
 and described
his actions as not protected
 by
the First Amendment. In April 2017, 
CNN
reported
,
“US authorities have prepared charges to seek the arrest of
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.” The Obama Justice Department
determined it would be difficult to bring charges against Assange
because WikiLeaks wasn’t alone in publishing documents stolen by
Manning but the Trump DOJ believes he could be charged as an
accomplice with Edward Snowden.

When
the president campaigned, 
Trump
said he loved WikiLeaks
 and
regularly touted their disclosures. But, in April 2017, Attorney
General Jeff S
essions
said that Assange’s arrest is a “priority
.”


Time
To Stop the Persecution of Julian Assange

The
smearing of Assange sought to discredit him and undermine the
important journalism of WikiLeaks. 
Caitlin
Johnstone writes
 that
they smear him because “they can kill all sympathy for him and his
outlet, it’s as good for their agendas as actually killing him.”

Even
with this character assassination many people still support Assange.
This was seen during the 
#Unity4J
online vigi
l,
which saw the participation of activists, journalists, whistleblowers
and filmmakers calling for the end of Assange’s solitary
confinement and his release. This was followed a week later by 
20
protests around the world calling for Assange’s release
.

Julian
Assange has opened journalism’s democracy door; the power to report
is being redistributed, government employees and corporate
whistleblowers have been empowered and greater transparency is
becoming a reality. The people of the United States should demand
that Assange not face prosecution and embrace a 21st Century
democratized media that provides greater transparency and accurate
information about what government and business interests are doing.
Prosecuting a news organization for publishing the truth, should be
rejected and Assange should be freed.

You
can support Julian Assange by spreading the word in your communities
about what is happening to him and why. You can also show support for
him on social media. We will continue to let you know when there are
actions planned. And you can support the WikiLeaks Legal Defense
Fund, run by the Courage Foundation, at 
IAmWikiLeaks.org.

Kevin
Zeese and Margaret Flowers co-direct 
Popular
Resistance
.
Kevin Zeese is on the advisory board of the Courage Foundation. This
article first appeared as the
weekly
newsletter
 of
the organization.

Read
more by Kevin B. Zeese

===============================

Zie ook:

Julian Assange, valse beschuldigingen, Big Brother en VS steun voor terrorisme

WhiteHouse: US, Ecuador Coordinating About Future Of Assange AsylumDit is een artikel van Caitlin Johnstone (Rogue Journalist) en sluit perfect aan op het hierboven opgenomen artikel, waarin je overigens ook een link vindt naar een ander Johnstone artikel over deze zaak.

Julian Assange gedemoniseerd door media die hem zouden moeten steunen, waren ze bevolkt geweest door echte journalisten……..

WikiLeaks toont aan dat VS en GB een gezamenlijke gewelddadige en bedrieglijke buitenlandpolitiek voeren

De prijs op het hoofd van Julian Assange: 1 miljard dollar…..

Assange kan niet voor spionage worden vervolgd, immers hij is journalist >> aldus Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) in een video

Stop de isolatie van Julian Assange!’

Julian Assange (Wikileaks) haalt hypocriete Britse regering onderuit voorwijzen op belang van vrije en onafhankelijke media

Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

VS waarschuwde regering van Zweden voor Wikileaks in aanloop verkiezingen, Assange ‘moest en zou hangen’, ofwel de zoveelste VS manipulatie van verkiezingen elders……

Klokkenluidershuis zoals verwacht één grote mislukking………

Plasterk adviseert klokkenluidershuis niet onder te brengen bij ombudsman

Klokkenluiders in vervolg vogelvrij, een nieuwe EU wet…….

‘Huis voor Klokkenluiders’ bedoelt om klokkenluiden tegen te gaan………

Sven Kockelmann is overtuigd dat politici eerlijk zijn en van lobbyisten heeft hij nooit gehoord……… ha! ha! ha! ha!

AIVD geïnfiltreerd in Klokkenluidershuis, dat is ‘gewoon’ gebruik maken van vakkrachten……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Klokkenluidershuis een fiasco, zoals voorspeld………

Huis voor Klokkenluiders blijkt nog groter fiasco dan eerder gedacht…… Wat wil je? Opgezet op initiatief van bedrijven lobbykabinet Rutte 2……

Stop ‘Trade Secrets Protection Directive!’ Daarmee worden we overgeleverd aan bedrijven……..

 ‘Rutte 3 gaat 20 miljoen investeren in ‘onafhankelijke’ onderzoeksjournalistiek….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Britse regering wil klokkenluiders tot 14 jaar gevangenisstraf geven………… Leve de vrije nieuwsgaring!!

Journalist Michael Hastings werd vermoord met autobom………

Op
18 juni 2013 zou onderzoeksjournalist Michael Hastings de motor van zijn auto
hebben opgeblazen door met 160 km/u. tegen een boom te rijden……. (een belachelijke claim, ‘maar goed…’)

Na
onderzoek bleek echter dat Hastings minder dan 65 km/u. reed en dat
zijn motor al explodeerde voordat deze tegen een boom aanreed (ofwel
Hastings was toen naar grote waarschijnlijkheid al dood…..)

De
motor van de auto werd gelanceerd en kwam 30 meter verder terecht,
bovendien hoorden getuigen niet één maar meerdere explosies…….

Tegen
de wil van de familie werd het lichaam van Hastings gecremeerd, nadat
een officiele autopsie was uitgevoerd……..

Hastings
liet bekenden uren voor zijn dood nog weten dat hij werd onderzocht
door de FBI, dit n.a.v. zijn onderzoek naar John Brennan, de latere
CIA chef….. De FBI ontkende dit later en oh wonder: de FBI bleek alweer te
hebben gelogen………

Dit
alles in het land dat prat gaat op haar democratie….. Een ‘democratie’ die voor een fiks
deel van het volk een farce is daar hen het stemmen onmogelijk wordt gemaakt,
bovendien als je niet beschikt over enorme kapitalen of vrienden die
een bak geld overhebben voor jouw kandidaatschap, kan je het zonder
meer vergeten mocht je de politiek in willen……. (waar je ook nog eens christelijk voor moet zijn en
de kerk moet bezoeken)

De
VS, hetzelfde land waar men te pas en te onpas stelt dat de vrijheid
van meningsuiting en vrije nieuwsgaring belangrijke pijlers zijn van
die democratie, echter van beiden is al lang geen sprake meer, zo
blijkt ook uit de video die ik van Brasscheck TV ontving over deze
zaak.

In
het begeleidende artikel wordt ook gewezen op de reguliere (massa-)
media die dit verhaal ondanks de vele feiten ‘links’ links lieten
liggen……. 

Wat velen al weten is dat de CIA en FBI
verantwoordelijk zijn voor een flink aantal moorden in de VS, moorden zoals die op de
‘lastige’ Hastings, niet vreemd dus dat zij wijzen naar deze diensten
of één daarvan als dader dan wel opdrachtgever…… Politie en
brandweer werd te verstaan gegeven over dit ‘ongeluk’ te
zwijgen…….

De
zoveelste journalist die definitief het zwijgen is opgelegd. De
journalisten in de VS die hun werk doen en dit kwalitatief wel goed doen (i.t.t. tot het grootste deel van hun collega’s), wordt in 99% van de gevallen het werk onmogelijk gemaakt, aldus de
Brasscheck redactie….. Neem aan dat dit enigszins overdreven is, echter als je de reguliere pers in de VS onder de loep neemt, is het wel duidelijk dat de berichtgeving (
veelal behoorlijk gevuld met fake news [nepnieuws]) van deze pers allesbehalve onafhankelijk is te noemen (en dus van belabberd niveau is….)…..

THE
MURDER OF JOURNALIST MICHAEL HASTINGS

IT
WAS MURDER, BUT WHO DID IT?

POLICE
AND FIRE DEPARTMENTS TOLD TO SHUT UP ABOUT WHAT HAPPENED

On
this day in 2013, US journalist Michael Hastings died under
mysterious circumstances.

News
reports said he was traveling at 100 miles per hour and his car
exploded when he hit a tree.

Wrong
and wrong.

Video
analysis by a physics professor says he was traveling less than 40
mph and his car exploded before he hit a tree and the engine and
drive train were found over 100 feet away – behind where the car
hit the tree, a physical impossibility from a collision. Multiple
explosions were reported.

Hastings
body was cremated after the official autopsy – against the wishes
of the family.

Hours
before he died, Hastings told friends he was under investigation by
the FBI for a story he was doing about Obama’s then terrorism czar,
who later became the head of the CIA: John Brennan, architect of the
black ops assassination program.

The
FBI denied this. The FBI was found to be lying. (Surprise, surprise.)

The
story didn’t pass the “smell test” with the local TV news, but
their detailed and thoroughly researched concerns was 100% ignored by
national news reports.

Note:
There are some decent people in the news media, but there work is
shut down 99% of the time.

==========================

Zie ook: ‘Nepnieuws (fake news) gebracht door MISOC, ofwel het leger van de VS beïnvloed journalistiek en bevolking in binnen- en buitenland………….

Russische hack DNC: na 2 jaar nog geen flinter van bewijs……

Ray
McGovern, een ex-CIA agent, die zoals je gerust kan stellen tot
inkeer kwam, schreef een artikel op Consortium News over het
‘Russische hack’ verhaal.

Volkomen
terecht stelt McGovern dat er na 2 jaar nog steeds geen schijn van
bewijs is voor Russische hack van het DNC, het comité dat zwaar op de
hand van Hillary Clinton was en dat er voor zorgde dat haar tegenkandidaat
Bernie Sanders de voorverkiezingen verloor…… Het DNC wist van
Julian Assange dat hij zou komen met uitgelekte documenten waaruit
e.e.a. zou blijken. Om Assange voor te zijn werd rap naar de Russen
gewezen als de dader die deze documenten middels een hack zou hebben
bemachtigd en deze Wikileaks zou hebben doen toekomen……..

Intussen
is uit en te na bewezen dat deze documenten door een lid van het DNC
zijn gelekt, waarschijnlijk uit frustratie over het meer dan smerige
spel van het DNC tijdens de democratische voorverkiezingen. Deze klokkenluider is naar grote waarschijnlijkheid
Seth Rich, die niet lang nadat de ellende begon werd vermoord tijdens
een ‘straatroof’ terwijl er niets van hem werd gestolen zelfs zijn
geld niet……..

Onterecht
merkt McGovern op dat dit hele hackverhaal niet meer terug komt in de
media, echter dat is onzin, zoals de al evenzeer niet bewezen
manipulaties door de Russen van de presidentsverkiezing regelmatig in de media worden genoemd, het enige verschil is dat men niet verder
spreekt over deze belachelijke beschuldiging, maar deze eenvoudig
aanhaalt als bewijs voor de smerige rol die Rusland zou hebben gespeeld en speelt…..
Ofwel: het demoniseren van Rusland op grond van leugens, terwijl de ware demon de VS zelf
is, de grootste terreurentiteit op onze aarde……… 

De NSA en de andere geheime diensten van de VS hebben een enorm scala aan mogelijkheden om de schuld voor bepaalde door de VS begane zaken op het internet, in de schoenen van een ander land kan schuiven en dat ook daadwerkelijk heeft gedaan, zie de Vault 7 en 8 documenten op Wikileaks……..

McGovern
heeft de zaak nog eens netjes op een rij gezet en dat werkt uiterst
verhelderend na een paar jaar middels leugens haat en angstzaaien tegen/voor de
Russen.

Still
Waiting for Evidence of a Russian Hack

June
7, 2018 at 8:14 pm

Written
by 
Ray
McGovern

More
than two years after the allegation of a Russian hack of the 2016
U.S. presidential election was first made, conclusive proof is still
lacking and may never be produced.

(CN Op-ed) — If
you are wondering why so little is heard these days of accusations
that Russia hacked into the U.S. election in 2016, it could be
because those charges could not 
withstand close scrutiny.
It could also be because special counsel Robert Mueller appears to
have never bothered to investigate what was once the central alleged
crime in Russia-gate as no one associated with WikiLeaks has ever
been questioned by his team.

Veteran
Intelligence Professionals for Sanity — including two “alumni”
who were former National Security Agency (NSA) technical directors — have
long since concluded that Julian Assange did not acquire what he
called the “emails related to Hillary Clinton” via a “hack”
by the Russians or anyone else. They found, rather, that he got them
from someone with physical access to Democratic National Committee (DNC) computers who copied the material onto an external storage device —
probably a thumb drive. In December 2016 VIPS 
explained this
in some detail in an open Memorandum to President Barack Obama.

On
January 18, 2017 President Obama 
admitted that
the “conclusions” of U.S. intelligence regarding how the alleged
Russian hacking got to WikiLeaks were “inconclusive.” Even the
vapid FBI/CIA/NSA “Intelligence Community Assessment of Russian
Activities and Intentions in Recent U.S. Elections” of January 6,
2017, which tried to blame Russian

President
Vladimir Putin for election interference, 
contained no
direct evidence of Russian involvement.  That did not prevent
the “handpicked” authors of that poor excuse for intelligence
analysis from expressing “high confidence” that Russian
intelligence “relayed material it acquired from the Democratic
National Committee … to WikiLeaks.” 

Handpicked
analysts, of course, say what they are handpicked to say.

Never
mind. The FBI/CIA/NSA “assessment” became bible truth for
partisans like Rep. Adam Schiff (D-CA), ranking member of the House
Intelligence Committee, who was among the first off the blocks to
blame Russia for interfering to help Trump.  It simply could not
have been that Hillary Clinton was quite capable of snatching defeat
out of victory all by herself.  No, it had to have been the
Russians.

Five
days into the Trump presidency, I had a chance to 
challenge Schiff
personally on the gaping disconnect between the Russians and
WikiLeaks. Schiff still “can’t share the evidence” with me …
or with anyone else, because it does not exist.

WikiLeaks

It
was on June 12, 2016, just six weeks before the Democratic National
Convention, that Assange announced the pending publication of “emails
related to Hillary Clinton,” throwing the Clinton campaign into
panic mode, since the emails would document strong bias in favor of
Clinton and successful attempts to sabotage the campaign of Bernie
Sanders. 

When
the emails were published on July 22, just three days before the
convention began, the campaign decided to create what I call a
Magnificent Diversion, drawing attention away from the substance of
the emails by blaming Russia for their release.

Clinton’s
PR chief Jennifer Palmieri later 
admitted that
she golf-carted around to various media outlets at the convention
with instructions “to get the press to focus on something even we
found difficult to process: the prospect that Russia had not only
hacked and stolen emails from the DNC, but that it had done so to
help Donald Trump and hurt Hillary Clinton.”  The diversion
worked like a charm.  Mainstream media kept shouting “The
Russians did it,” and gave little, if any, play to the DNC
skullduggery revealed in the emails themselves. And like Brer’ Fox,
Bernie didn’t say nothin’.

Meanwhile,
highly sophisticated technical experts, were hard at work fabricating
“forensic facts” to “prove” the Russians did it.  Here’s
how it played out:

June
12, 2016:
 Assange announces that WikiLeaks is about to
publish “emails related to Hillary Clinton.”

June
14, 2016:
 DNC contractor CrowdStrike, (with a dubious
professional record and multiple conflicts of interest) announces
that malware has been found on the DNC server and claims there is
evidence it was injected by Russians.

June
15, 2016:
 “Guccifer 2.0” affirms the DNC statement;
claims responsibility for the “hack;” claims to be a WikiLeaks
source; and posts a document that the forensics show was
synthetically tainted with “Russian fingerprints.”

The
June 12, 14, & 15 timing was hardly coincidence. Rather, it was
the start of a pre-emptive move to associate Russia with anything
WikiLeaks might have been about to publish and to “show” that it
came from a Russian hack.

Enter
Independent Investigators

A
year ago independent cyber-investigators completed the kind of
forensic work that, for reasons best known to then-FBI Director James
Comey, neither he nor the “handpicked analysts” who wrote the
Jan. 6, 2017 assessment bothered to do.  The independent
investigators found verifiable evidence from metadata found in the
record of an alleged Russian hack of July 5, 2016 showing that the
“hack” that day of the DNC by Guccifer 2.0 was not a hack, by
Russia or anyone else.

Rather
it originated with a copy (onto an external storage device – a
thumb drive, for example) by an insider — the same 
process used
by the DNC insider/leaker before June 12, 2016 for an altogether
different purpose. (Once the metadata was found and the “fluid
dynamics” principle of physics applied, this was not difficult
to 
disprove the
validity of the claim that Russia was responsible.)

One
of these independent investigators publishing under the name of The
Forensicator on May 31 
published new evidence that
the Guccifer 2.0 persona uploaded a document from the West Coast of
the United States, and not from Russia.

In
our July 24, 2017 Memorandum to President Donald Trump we 
stated,
“We do not know who or what the murky Guccifer 2.0 is. You may wish
to ask the FBI.”

Our July
24 Memorandum continued: “Mr. President, the disclosure
described below may be related. Even if it is not, it is
something we think you should be made aware of in this general
connection. On March 7, 2017, WikiLeaks began to publish a trove
of original CIA documents that WikiLeaks labeled ‘Vault
7.’ WikiLeaks said it got the trove from a current or former
CIA contractor and described it as comparable in scale and
significance to the information Edward Snowden gave to reporters in
2013.

No
one has challenged the authenticity of the original documents of
Vault 7, which disclosed a vast array of cyber warfare tools
developed, probably with help from NSA, by CIA’s Engineering
Development Group. That Group was part of the sprawling CIA
Directorate of Digital Innovation – a growth industry established
by John Brennan in 2015. [ (VIPS
warned President
Obama of some of the dangers of that basic CIA reorganization at the
time.]

Marbled

Scarcely
imaginable digital tools – that can take control of your car and
make it race over 100 mph, for example, or can enable remote spying
through a TV – were described and duly reported in the New York
Times and other media throughout March. But the Vault 7, part 3
release on March 31 that exposed the “Marble Framework”
program apparently was judged too delicate to qualify as ‘news fit
to print’ and was kept out of the 
Times at
the time, and has never been mentioned 
since.

The
Washington Post’s Ellen Nakashima, it seems, ‘did not get the
memo’ in time. Her March 31 
article bore
the catching (and accurate) headline: ‘WikiLeaks’ latest release
of CIA cyber-tools could blow the cover on agency hacking
operations.’

The
WikiLeaks release indicated that Marble was designed for flexible and
easy-to-use ‘obfuscation,’ and that Marble source code includes a
“de-obfuscator” to reverse CIA text obfuscation.

More
important, the CIA reportedly used Marble during 2016. In
her 
Washington
Post 
report,
Nakashima left that out, but did include another significant point
made by WikiLeaks; namely, that the obfuscation tool could be used to
conduct a ‘forensic attribution double game’ or false-flag
operation because it included test samples in Chinese, Russian,
Korean, Arabic and Farsi.”

A
few weeks later William Binney, a former NSA technical director,
and I 
commented on
Vault 7 Marble, and were able to get a shortened op-ed
version 
published in The
Baltimore Sun
.

The
CIA’s reaction to the WikiLeaks disclosure of the Marble Framework
tool was neuralgic.

Then
Director Mike Pompeo lashed out two weeks later, calling Assange
and his associates “demons,” and insisting; “It’s time to
call out WikiLeaks for what it really is, a non-state hostile
intelligence service, often abetted by state actors like Russia.”

Our July
24 Memorandum continued:  “Mr. President, we do not know
if CIA’s Marble Framework, or tools like it, played some kind of
role in the campaign to blame Russia for hacking the DNC. Nor do
we know how candid the denizens of CIA’s Digital Innovation
Directorate have been with you and with Director Pompeo. These
are areas that might profit from early White House review.  [
President Trump then directed Pompeo to invite Binney, one of the
authors of the July 24, 2017 VIPS Memorandum to the President, to
discuss all this.  Binney and Pompeo spent an hour together at
CIA Headquarters on October 24, 2017, during which Binney briefed
Pompeo with his customary straightforwardness. ]

We
also do not know if you have discussed cyber issues in any detail
with President Putin. In his interview with NBC’s Megyn Kelly
he seemed quite willing – perhaps even eager – to address issues
related to the kind of cyber tools revealed in the Vault 7
disclosures, if only to indicate he has been briefed on them. Putin
pointed out that today’s technology enables hacking to be ‘masked
and camouflaged to an extent that no one
can understand the origin’ [of the hack] … And, vice
versa, it is possible to set up any entity or any
individual that everyone will think that they are the exact
source of that attack.

“‘Hackers
may be anywhere,’ he said. ‘There may be hackers, by the way,
in the United
 
States
who very craftily and professionally passed the buck
to Russia. Can’t you imagine such a scenario? … I can.’

New
attention has been drawn to these issues after I discussed them in a
widely published 16-minute 
interview last
Friday.

In
view of the highly politicized environment surrounding these issues,
I believe I must append here the same notice that VIPS felt compelled
to add to our key Memorandum of July 24, 2017:

Full
Disclosure: Over recent decades the ethos of our intelligence
profession has eroded in the public mind to the point that
agenda-free analysis is deemed well nigh impossible. Thus, we
add this disclaimer, which applies to everything we in VIPS say and
do: We have no political agenda; our sole purpose is to spread truth
around and, when necessary, hold to account our former intelligence
colleagues.

We
speak and write without fear or favor. Consequently, any resemblance
between what we say and what presidents, politicians and pundits say
is purely coincidental.” The fact we find it is necessary to
include that reminder speaks volumes about these highly politicized
times.

Ray
McGovern was a CIA analyst for 27 years and co-founded Veteran
Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

Op-ed
by 
Ray
McGovern
 /
Republished with permission / 
Consortium
News
 / Report
a typo

Aanslag WTC 1993 >> YouTube wil niet dat video waarin FBI wordt aangewezen als mededader wordt uitgezonden………

Ontving
vandaag een video van Brasscheck TV, waarin de
FBI wordt aangewezen als mededader van de aanslag op het WTC in
1993…….

De
FBI wist ruim van tevoren van deze aanslag, heeft zelf een figuur gerekruteerd om de bom te maken, t.w. een oud legerofficier van het
Egyptische leger…… Voorts zou de FBI deze figuur hebben opgedragen geen
onschuldig poeder te gebruiken bij het maken van de bom, maar het
echte spul te gebruiken…… Kortom ook de aanslag op het WTC in 1993 was in feite een false flag operatie van de FBI

Brasscheck
TV kreeg een boodschap van YouTube waarin Brasscheck TV werd
gewaarschuwd deze video niet uit te zenden (ofwel op de site te
zetten) vanwege het kopierecht………  

Als
YouTube dit argument gebruikt, is er altijd een klager die zich heeft
gemeld (de kopierechthouder) bij YouTube, echter in dit geval is de
aangever anoniem……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ofwel: de aangever is YouTube en dat onder druk van de FBI!

The
FBI and terrorism

NEWS VIDEO “THEY”
DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE

WHY
DID WE GET A COPYRIGHT COMPLAINT ON THIS ONE?

We
don’t get many copyright complaints… so when we do, it’s
instructive.

For some
reason this video struck a nerve with someone who didn’t want you
to see it.

Who filed the
complaint on this one?

Believe it or
not, we are NOT allowed to see who it is.

I’ve never
seen this YouTube before. Normally, they tell you who is making the
complaint.

This time we
received this statement from YouTube (in red):

You
don’t have permission to view copyright information for that video 

Imagine that.
Someone or something is making a claim against our right to share
this video – and the identity of the complainant is a secret.

Bizarre.

=========================

Heb ook het label 911 toegevoegd, dit vanwege de aanslag die in 2001 op hetzelfde  WTC werd gepleegd. Ook daar was sprake van samenspanning van VS geheime diensten met de door hen gerekruteerde daders……. (wie had er het grootste belang bij de 911 aanslagen? Juist: de VS en dan m.n. de G.W. Bush administratie, plus de wapenfabrikanten uit de VS, ook de wapenfabrieken die vliegend, varend en rollend militair materieel fabriceren)…….

Geëxecuteerd middels suïcide, de manier om van lastige VIP’s af te komen…….

‘Complottheorie Denken’ noemt men dat, wanneer men beweert dat een bekende persoon die zich gesuïcideerd zou hebben, hoogstwaarschijnlijk of (na onderzoek) zelfs onomstotelijk bewezen is omgebracht door de overheid.

‘Vreemd genoeg’ blijken de complotdenkers echter vaak gelijk te hebben of te krijgen, zo werd Martin Luther King in feite door de FBI vermoord…..* Als je alleen dat feit al in aanmerking neemt, hoe moeilijk kan het dan zijn iemand om te brengen, die regelmatig of incidenteel harddrugs anders dan, of juist in combinatie met de harddrug alcohol gebruikt?? Inderdaad een klus waar je op het eerste gezicht zo mee wegkomt: neem heroïne: er wordt eigenlijk alleen versneden heroïne op de markt gebracht. Verkoop of geef iemand zuivere heroïne en een dodelijke overdosis vindt haar weg………..

Op zeker ook dat de VS overheid, waarschijnlijk de FBI en/of de CIA een aantal ‘vervelende grootheden’ uit de 60er jaren en van latere datum hebben vermoord, artiesten/muzikanten die zich negatief uit hebben gelaten over de VS, zoals verzet tegen de smerige Vietnamoorlog, waarin de VS een paar miljoen mensen vermoordde middels tapijtbombardementen en bombardementen met napalm. Heden ten dage komen er nog Vietnamezen en mensen in aangrenzende landen als Laos om het leven door onontplofte munitie van de VS….. Zoals er nog steeds mensen overlijden door blootstalling aan Agent Orange, een ontbladermiddel dat de VS in Vietnam gebruikte op gebieden met oerwoud, een stof die net als de gebruikte napalm deels opgeslagen lag Rotterdam…..

Terug naar het onderwerp: het volgende bericht van Brasscheck TV gaat over dit soort zaken, bijzonder onwaarschijnlijke suïcides, waarvan een fiks aantal onder zeer verdachte omstandigheden…… Zoals iemand die zich tweemaal door het hoofd heeft geschoten…… Ook Kurt Cobain komt aan de orde, van wie ook een interview is te zien in het volgende artikel:

Executed
by “suicide”

THE
DEATH OF KURT COBAIN
AS THE ROSETTA STONE OF “SUICIDED”
ACTIVISTS

THE
PATTERN IS ALWAYS THE SAME

From
the movie “Soaked in Bleach.”

One
of our most important videos ever for understanding the mechanics of
how inconvenient people are “suicided.”

Soaked
in Bleach” is the single best account of how murders are staged and
then “transformed” by idiot and/or corrupt cops and the news
media into “suicides.”

Other
examples:


Danny
Casolaro
…investigative
journalist who documented Bush family crimes.

Reportedly
cut his own wrist 10 to 12 times in a hotel room.


Gary
Webb.
..investigative
journalist who revealed details of CIA involvement in drug dealing

Reportedly
shot himself in the head TWICE


Vince
Foster
…a
long time Clinton friend and insider who was having second thoughts
about his criminal collaborations with the Clintons

Reportedly
shot himself with his right hand even though he was left handed.


Aaron
Swartz.
..possibly
the most effective Internet rights activist of all time

Reportedly
hung himself after his attorney assured him that a trumped up federal
government case against him was weak.


David
Kelly.
..UK
weapons inspector who publicly called into question the UK
government’s fraudulent “proof” of Iraq’s weapons program

Reportedly
cut his ulnar artery with a bread knife, a tool unlikely to do the
job and on an artery an injury to which is unlikely to end anyone’s
life.


JH
Hatfield
…had
the goods on George W. Bush’s cocaine use

Reported
suicide by drug overdose in a hotel room


Mark
Lombardi
…successful
artist who documented connections between the Bush family and the Bin
Ladens

Reportedly
hung himself just as he was achieving significant commercial success
and media attention.


Deborah
Palfrey
…the
“DC Madam” who had over 10,000 client records including top
Washington people.

Reportedly
went to her mother’s home to hang herself in her storage shed.


Frank
Olson
…CIA
scientist and biological warfare expert who declared his intention to
quit

Reportedly
jumped out of a hotel window as the result of a bad LSD trip nine
days before.


They
all committed suicide because they were “depressed.”


Not
so fast.

As
this documentary on the death of Kurt Corbain shows:

  1. The “he was depressed” story is always injected into the media
    narrative early and often and rarely has any basis in fact.
    Sometimes, in the case of Kurt Cobain, it is carefully manufactured
    before the suicide is discovered.
  1. Some
    targets may have been under significant stress, but had resilient
    personalities and in some cases had no reason to be depressed at all

  1. Police
    in these cases are remarkably incompetent, declarations are made far
    in advance of any reasonable investigation, and essential evidence –
    including the body itself – is often destroyed.

  1. False
    suicide notes are created.

The
“suicide” of Kurt Cobain shows how sloppy and/or corrupt police
work and media manipulation turn obvious homicide cases into “end
of story” suicide accounts.

Kurt
Cobain – level headed, down-to-earth.

Does
he seem like someone likely to commit suicide?

* Zie: ‘Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..

Zie ook: ‘Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 8 wijze lessen!

J.F. Kennedy vermoord door Lyndon Johnson en z’n maten in misdaad, geheime diensten en politiek…..

John Lennon 9 oktober 1940 – 8 december 1980 Power to the People!

De
langzame moord op de ideeën van Martin Luther King……………..
Ofwel: Dr. Martin Luther Kings lessen willens en wetens verzwegen….

Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht

Nam Kurt Cobain zijn eigen leven? Niet volgens een flink aantal mensen

Georganiseerde
misdaad en overheid, wat is het verschil tussen die twee? Een uiterst
hilarische lezing van Michael Parenti over de moord op JFK!

Martin Luther King misbruikt door Radio1

Paul
Scheffer, het media-orakel met een ‘vlijmscherpe analyse’ over het
racistische optreden van de politie in de VS……… AUW!!!

Willem Post over de zegeningen van het zero tolerance beleid in de VS en ach, het is misschien ietsje doorgeschoten…….

PS: je zou je zelfs voor kunnen stellen dat een flink aantal
journalisten niet langer durven te schrijven wat ze voor ogen komt, daar
ook hen regelmatig een vreemde dood treft en dan bedoel ik in westerse
landen…..

Homeland Security (VS) wil een database waarin de gangen en daarmee de bronnen van journalisten worden vastgelegd……

Het VS
departement (ofwel ministerie) van Homeland Security (DHS) wil de gangen van
journalisten, bloggers, opiniemakers e.a. op de sociale media na kunnen gaan en deze vastleggen in een database, waar van minuut tot minuut de gegevens worden opgeslagen……… Uiteraard liggen daarmee de bronnen van journalisten op straat en kunnen klokkenluiders het in de openbaarheid brengen van onrecht wel vergeten, zeker als je ziet hoe men in de VS met klokkenluiders omgaat (neem bijvoorbeeld Edward Snowden, die in vrijwillige ballingschap leeft in Rusland, daar hem anders een lange gevangenisstraf wacht in de VS, of zie de schandalige omgang met Chelsea Manning)

De NSA
zou al een dergelijke database hebben aldus de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel, echter daar heb ik m’n twijfels bij, daar men keer
op keer de weinige journalisten die hun werk nog echt onafhankelijk doen, onder druk zet
om hun bronnen vrij te geven, of zie de druk van de FBI op Apple om toegang te krijgen tot iPhones…. Iets dat met het continu in de gaten
houden van journalisten en anderen met gebruikmaking van een database niet nodig zou zijn.

Tyler
Houlton de persvoorlichter van DHS, durfde kritiek op dit meer dan
schandalige plan van zijn ‘ministerie’, een samenzweringstheorie (of: complottheorie) te noemen…….
ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ja, hoe durven ze kritiek te hebben op een plan waarmee de vrije
persgaring tot het verleden zal behoren, dus kritiek te hebben op een letterlijke samenzwering tegen
de laatste rest van de vrije pers*…..??!!!

Vergeet bij dit alles niet dat de gewenste controles die geheime diensten voorstaan, ‘nodig zijn’ vanwege door het westen en m.n. de VS gecreëerde terreur (gecreëerd middels de grootschalige terreur die de VS zelf bijvoorbeeld in het Midden-Oosten uitoefent…)…. Bovendien als deze geheime diensten al een terrorist in het vizier hebben, laten ze deze alsnog een aanslag plegen, dit blijkt keer op keer…… Het is deze diensten dan ook te doen om totale controle te verkrijgen over de burgers, de journalistiek en de sociale media (en daarmee de critici de mond te snoeren), plus de opzet klokkenluiders te ontmoedigen!

Lees het
volgende artikel en huiver, een artikel van Tyler Durden, eerder (4 april j.l.) gepubliceerd op Zero Hedge:

DHS
to Create Journalist-Tracking Database, Labels Critics “Conspiracy
Theorists”

April
7, 2018 at 12:47 pm

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE) — The
Department of Homeland Security (DHS) wants to track the vast
networks of journalists, bloggers and other “media influencers”
through a massive, searchable database that will allow them to
monitor “any and all” trends in real time, according to a
publicly posted job listing.

Apparently
the NSA doesn’t share their toys with DHS…

The
DHS “Media Monitoring” initiative is currently 
seeking
a contractor
 who
can provide DHS with the ability to track over 
290,000
global news sources
 in
more than 100 languages – including 
online,
print, broadcast, cable, radio, trade and industry publications,
traditional news sources and social media 
platforms.

Services
shall provide media comparison tools, design and re-branding tools,
communication tools, and the ability to identify top media
influencers,” according to the job call, in order to help DHS
agencies fulfill “a critical need to incorporate these functions
into their programs in order to better reach federal, state, local,
tribal, and private partners.”

The
department’s “Statement of Work for Media Monitoring Services”
requires the following:

Ability
to track global online sources for coverage relevant to Washington
and the six media hubs:

•  
 
Ability
to track > 290,000 global news sources

•  
 Ability to track online, print, broadcast, cable, radio, trade
and industry publications, local sources, national/international
outlets, traditional news sources, and social media
•  
 
Ability
to track media coverage in > 100 languages, including Arabic,
Chinese and Russian
.
Translation function to instantly translate these articles to
English.
•    
Ability
to create up to 20 searches with each unlimited keywords

•  
 Unlimited coverage per search (no cap on coverage)
•  
 Ability to change the searches at keywords at any given
time
•    Ability to create unlimited data
tracking, statistical breakdown, and graphical analyses on any
coverage on an ad-hoc basis

Database
of Journalists, Editors, Correspondents, Social Media Influencers,
Bloggers, etc.

The
chosen contractor must be able to develop a “password
protected, media influencer database” which can perform searches in
various languages, and 
present
contact details and any other information that could be relevant,
including publications that this influencer writes for, and an
overview of the previous coverage published by the media
influencer.” 

Media
Intelligence and Benchmarking Dashboard Platform
 

The
vendor must provide a specialized “Dashboard” for DHS to use
which will provide them with a specialized search engine, real time
monitoring, analysis and benchmark of media coverage (how viral
something is going, for example), geographical spread, and top
influencers.

24/7
Access to a password protected, online platform for users to
access:
•    Overview of search results in terms
of online articles and social media conversations
•  
 Customized and Interactive Dashboard that provide real-time
monitoring, analysis, and benchmark of media coverage.
•  
 
Ability
to analyze the media coverage in terms of content, volume, sentiment,
geographical spread, top publications, media channels, reach, AVE,
top posters, influencers, languages, momentum, circulation.

•  
 Ability to select time-period of analysis: per day, week,
month, and selected dates
•    Ability to build
media lists based on beat, location, outlet type/size, and journalist
role
•    Automated weekly overview of these
dashboards sent via email

Mobile
App

DHS
also requires access to a “password protected, mobile app”
allowing access to all of the collected metrics and monitoring
information.

No
word on whether DHS has commissioned a 
database
of MSM connections to establishment politicians
,
but we’re sure that’s on its way.

DHS
Calls Critics “Conspiracy Theorists”

In
response to what many suggest are Orwellian monitoring of media
influencers, DHS Press Secretary Tyler Houlton issued a response on
Friday which justifies the program’s legitimacy and alleges that
the project’s goals are “standard practice.”

Any
suggestion otherwise is fit for tinfoil hat-wearing, black-helicopter
conspiracy theorists,”
 added
Houlton.

Tyler Q. Houlton

@SpoxDHS

Despite what some reporters may suggest, this is nothing more than the standard practice of monitoring current events in the media. Any suggestion otherwise is fit for tin foil hat wearing, black helicopter conspiracy theorists. https://twitter.com/pressfreedom/status/982366421849202690 

Absent
blindly trusting Houlton, we’ve been given no indication as to how
the Trump administration – or future administrations, might use the
massive tracking database. The Bloomberg article points to the
Senate’s recent interest in designating Al Jazeera as a foreign
agent ” because it “often directly undermines” U.S.
interests with favorable coverage of Hamas, Hezbollah and al-Qaeda’s
branch in Syria,” however we’re sure the U.S. government could
monitor specific platforms-of-interest without a massive database of
every outlet’s past and present body of work.

Tyler Q. Houlton


@SpoxDHS

Despite what some reporters may suggest, this is nothing more than the standard practice of monitoring current events in the media. Any suggestion otherwise is fit for tin foil hat wearing, black helicopter conspiracy theorists. https://twitter.com/pressfreedom/status/982366421849202690 

Former FSO@FormerFSO

DHS is so hungry for information about the media it just Goebbels it up

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

==================================

* Onder
die vrije pers bevinden zich de reguliere massamedia, echter die
dragen al lang de inhumane neoliberale status quo uit, waarbij ze zo
ongeveer alles verdedigen aan anti-democratische maatregelen die
worden ingevoerd, waarbij de privacy van de burger over het algemeen ook nog eens als
een overbodige luxe wordt bestempeld…….. Het DHS plan voor
persbreidel zal dan ook vooral de echte vrije pers (ofwel de niet reguliere
media, zoals Anti-Media, op de sociale media) treffen en
klokkenluiders voorgoed het werk onmogelijk maken………

Voor meer berichten over het Department of Homeland Security, klik op het label DHS, direct onder dit bericht.

PS: het in het artikel genoemde Al Qaida Syrië, werd vorig jaar door de VS van de zwarte lijst, ofwel terreurlijst gehaald……..

Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht

Het zal je niet ontgaan zijn, de moord op Martin Luther King, vandaag precies 50 jaar geleden. Op BBC en WDR lange bijdragen over het leven van King, waarbij de moord op hem alleen wordt genoemd, maar waar men niet ingaat op de vraag wie er achter de moord zat…….

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor martin luther king

Intussen is het al lang duidelijk dat meerdere geheime diensten uit de VS verantwoordelijk zijn voor de moord op King. Sterker nog: in 1999 werd in een rechtszaak van de familie King tegen de landelijke overheid*, deze overheid (meerdere geheime diensten als de FBI en de CIA) schuldig verklaard voor de moord op King en niet de veroordeelde James Earl Ray, die niets maar dan ook helemaal niets met de moord te maken had….

‘Toevallig’ waren er op de dag van de moord 8 scherpschutters van het 20ste Special Forces Team in de directe nabijheid van het motel waar King verbleef en waar hij van grote afstand werd neergeschoten……

Niet toevallig is het verzwijgen door de reguliere media van het hiervoor genoemde feit, al helemaal niet wat betreft deze media in de VS….. Nee veronderstel dat de VS nogmaals door de mand valt als terreurstaat…… Hetzelfde geldt dus ook voor het overgrote deel van de reguliere westerse media buiten de VS….. Tja, je gaat natuurlijk niet de ‘geweldige’ VS, ‘de politieagent van de wereld’, ons ‘grote voorbeeld’ beschuldigen van massamoord, verkrachting, marteling, coups plegen, geheime militaire acties zoals de moord op King en Kennedy, of erger nog het voluit voeren van illegale oorlogen….

Na de moord op King hebben de CIA en de DEA ervoor gezorgd dat de zwarte woonwijken werden overspoeld met heroïne, dit om verder verzet van de gekleurde bevolking te smoren, een doel dat voor een groot deel is behaald……

Overigens spreekt men alleen over King in samenhang met de strijd voor gelijke rechten in de VS, geen woord over zijn denkbeelden bijvoorbeeld over het inhumane kapitalisme…… (zie daarvoor de berichten onder de tweede en derde link hieronder) Alleen zijn verzet tegen de Vietnam Oorlog wordt ‘in de kantlijn’ nog even genoemd…..

* Zie de video van Brasscheck TV over de jury en de rechter die de overheid van de VS aanwees als dader van de moord op King:

Zie ook:

Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd

NAVO, het grootste militaire verbond maakt zich schuldig aan grootschalige terreur i.p.v. de vrede te bewaren‘ (o.a. geluidsfragmenten met het protest van King tegen de oorlog in Vietnam)

Thomas Merton >> een kritische rk geestelijke vermoord in hetzelfde jaar als Robert F. Kennedy en Martin Luther King

Fred Hampton 30 augustus 1948 – 4 december 1969 >> mensenrechtenactivist vermoord door FBI en Chicago politie

Martin Luther King: de moord van 50 jaar geleden door de VS overheid uiterst beperkt herdacht

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.: 8 wijze lessen!

Martin Luther King jr. vermoord door de overheid, aldus rechter……..

De langzame moord op de ideeën van Martin Luther King…………….. Ofwel: Dr. Martin Luther Kings lessen willens en wetens verzwegen….

De oorlog tegen het arme deel van de VS bevolking

Nam Kurt Cobain zijn eigen leven? Niet volgens een flink aantal mensen

Martin Luther King misbruikt door Radio1

 ‘Paul Scheffer, het media-orakel met een ‘vlijmscherpe analyse’ over het racistische optreden van de politie in de VS……… AUW!!!

Willem Post over de zegeningen van het zero tolerance beleid in de VS en ach, het is misschien ietsje doorgeschoten…….

De kop na plaatsing aangepast, met de toevoeging dat King werd vermoord door de overheid (mijn excuus), zie daarvoor de links hierboven, op 11 april 2018 toegevoegd.

Sleepwet: vrijgegeven documenten bewijzen dat de VS gewone burgers bespioneert >> zie ons voorland…….

Onlangs vrijgegeven documenten,
gepubliceerd door ‘The Electronic Border Foundation’ (EFF) en verkregen van
de in opspraak geraakte Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
(FISC), bewiijzen dat de VS wel degelijk gewone burgers bespioneert,
mensen die niets onwettigs hebben gedaan…..

Vooral de NSA en FBI maken zich
schuldig aan het afluisteren van gesprekken tussen mensen die op geen
manier een bedreiging vormen…… Ook aan het publiek in de VS is
meermaals voorgehouden dat met metadata verzameling hun privacy niet
geschonden zou worden, wel dus…….

Overigens bleek eerder al, dat de
geheime diensten in de VS (waartoe ik in deze ook de FBI reken) foto’s en
filmpjes uit internet bestanden van mensen plukken en bekijken……..

‘Onafhankelijke’ rechters besluiten achter gesloten deuren wat wel of niet is toegestaan en daarover is geen enkele openheid…… In Nederland wil de regering met de Sleepwet die stap zelfs achterwege laten bij het verzamelen van data en reken maar dat men wel degelijk telefoongesprekken zal beluisteren, ook al is daar geen enkele reden toe…… De toestemming mag met de Sleepwet in werking, ook achteraf worden gevraagd en gegeven >> de dood in de pot voor ons recht op privacy, onze privacy waar al niet teveel meer van over is……..

Zie in de VS waar wij naar toe gaan met de
nieuwe Sleepwet, die Rutte 3 van plan is erdoor te drukken…… Geloof maar niet dat het referendum, zelfs als de grote meerderheid tegen de Sleepwet stemt, daar enige verandering in zal brengen……. We hebben immers niet voor niets een ‘constitutionele democratie’, met een volksvertegenwoordiging, uh ik bedoel een bedrijven- en welgesteldenvertegenwoordiging…….

Newly
Released Documents Prove the US Gov’t Is Spying on Innocent
Americans

February
26, 2018 at 7:39 am

Written
by 
Derrick
Broze

(AP) — The
Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) has acquired formerly classified court
orders from the controversial Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court
(FISC) which detail how the court violates the privacy of innocent
Americans caught in the crossfire of federal surveillance. The
documents are the result of Freedom of Information Act requests filed
by the EFF as part of an effort to shine light on the inner workings
of the secret court.

The
EFF
 writes:

These
documents raise larger questions about whether the government can
meaningfully protect people’s privacy and free expression rights
under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act
(FISA), which permits officials to engage in warrantless mass
surveillance with far less court oversight than is required under the
“traditional” FISA warrant process.
[…]

Although
many of the 13 opinions are heavily redacted — and the government
withheld another 26 in full — the readable portions show several
instances of the court blocking government efforts to expand its
surveillance or ordering the destruction of information obtained
improperly as a result of its spying.

The
documents provided to the EFF detail several cases where
conversations of people not targeted by federal authorities were
swept up in the course of surveillance investigations. Specifically,
the documents show the National Security Agency (NSA) and the Federal
Bureau of Investigations (FBI) spying on innocent people and
attempting to conceal the practice. A 40-page court opinion from 2004
or 2005 details how FISC Judge Harold Baker declined a proposal from
FBI to save these conversations, often known as incidental
collection. “The opinion demonstrates both the risks of
over-collection as part of targeted surveillance as well as the
benefits of engaged, detailed court oversight,” The EFF notes.

Under
the standards set by section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence
Surveillance Act (FISA), the FISC approves digital surveillance for
federal agencies who are supposed to follow certain procedures to
prevent the accidental interception of innocent people’s
communications. The new documents highlight how the FBI used
incidental collection to capture the communications of a number of
innocent people.

The
FBI attempted to argue to Judge Baker that the practice has “minimal,
if any” impact on the Fourth Amendment protections against
invasions of privacy. The FISC apparently actually did their job by
attempting to prevent this practice from continuing and becoming
normalized. The surveillance court appeared to admonish the FBI for
expanding the use of incidental communications, rather than deleting
the communications of individuals unrelated to ongoing
investigations.

The
EFF notes that the court “faulted the FBI for failing to account
‘the possibility that overzealous or ill-intentioned personnel
might be inclined to misuse information, if given the opportunity.’
As the court put it, ‘the advantage of minimization at the
acquisition stage is clear. Information that is never acquired in the
first place cannot be misused.’”

The
surveillance court was originally created under the the Foreign
Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (FISA) in response to reports
produced by the 1975 Church Committee. The Senate panel was tasked
with investigating the foreign and domestic surveillance operations
by the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), NSA, and FBI during the
1970s. The Church Committee also released detailed reports on the
governments Counter Intelligence Programs (COINTELPRO) that were used
against activists and influential voices of opposition during the
1950s and ’60s.

These
newly released documents offer the latest example of how the secret
surveillance court is ripe for abuse. Although this example shows one
judge working to maintain some level of accountability, the vast
majority of the documents were redacted so there is no way to see if
this case is the exception or the norm. Further, this court order is
thirteen to fourteen years old. Take a moment to consider the massive
growth of the U.S. surveillance state and the FISC specifically.
There is simply no way to trust that this single judges effort to
hold the federal government accountable represent the status quo.

Much
of the issues surrounding the secret surveillance court related to
Section 702 of the FISA bill. According the EFF, Section 702 “allows
the NSA to collect emails, browser history and chat logs of
Americans. Section 702 also allows other agencies, like the FBI, to
search through that data without a warrant. Those searches are called
‘backdoor searches.’” As revealed by whistleblower Edward
Snowden in 2013, Section 702 also authorizes two Internet
surveillance programs known as PRISM and Upstream.

PRISM
gathers messaging data sent via Google, Facebook, Microsoft, Apple,
and other tech companies, while Upstream taps into the so-called
backbone of the Internet to gather data on targets. The NSA began
collecting Americans’ international phone calls and emails without
a warrant immediately after the 9/11 attacks as part of the Stellar
Wind program. Once the public became aware of the program in 2008,
Congress codified the program into law by passing section 702 of
FISA.

The
FISA Court is a glaring example of The Deep State. A secret court run
by secret judges who interpret the law behind closed doors and who
refuse to publicly release their findings or their interpretation.

By Derrick
Broze
 / Republished
with permission / 
Activist
Post
 / Report
a typo

================================

Zie ook: ‘Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

Via Artwave Art de volgende link: ‘Hoe zit het precies met die ‘sleepwet’? In deze vier podcasts leggen we het uit’ (door de Volkskrant, dus let op en geloof vooral niet alles wat je verteld wordt, zo zouden wij ook voordelen hebben van de sleepwet….. ha! ha! ha! ha! Alsof ze je had eraf hakken en dan stellen dat je nu veel beter gebruik van je andere hand zal gaan maken….)

Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………