Muellers onzinnige beschuldiging die Russiagate zou bewijzen……..

Muellers ‘troll farm’ verhaal ronduit waanzinnig………

Het is werkelijk om schijtziek van te
worden: de pogingen in de VS (en de rest van het westen) om Rusland te demoniseren en het verlies
van de presidentsverkiezingen door hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton te
wijten aan Russische manipulaties.

Voor al die claims is nul komma nada
bewijs, maar de VS en haar hielenlikkende oorlogshonden van de NAVO
houden deze leugens in de lucht, dit gesteund door de reguliere
media, die NB bijna dagelijks schrijven over ‘fake news’, terwijl
deze media verreweg de grootste leveranciers van dit nepnieuws
zijn…….

De vooralsnog laatste bladzijde in de
wrange komedie werd geschreven door oud-FBI directeur Robert
Mueller…….

Lees hoe David Stockman uitgebreid
gehakt maakt van het ‘troll farm verhaal’. (let op, sommige delen zijn dusdanig komisch dat je op moet passen er niet in te blijven):

Mueller’s
Comic Book Indictment: How to Prosecute A Great Big Nothingburger

By
David Stockman

February
21, 2018 “Information
Clearing House
” – We have always heard that a
determined government prosecutor can indict a ham sandwich, and now
we know it’s true. After 38 years in the prosecution racket, Robert
Mueller just made his biggest score ever—that is, he nailed
a great big Nothingburger.


But
he also did a lot more than that. Mueller’s 37-page comic book
indictment actually unmasks—inadvertently to be
sure—the 
distinctly
un-terrifying essence
 of
the whole Russian meddling narrative. In fact, the crude social media
emissions (ads and posts) of the so-called troll farm were
generally lame, often laughable and sometimes downright
ludicrous as per this gem cited by Mueller:

a.
On or about October 16, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the ORGANIZATION-controlled Instagram account “Woke Blacks”
to post the following message: 
“[A]
particular hype and hatred for Trump is misleading the people and
forcing Blacks to vote Killary. We cannot resort to the lesser of two
devils. Then we’d surely be better off without voting AT ALL.”

Notwithstanding
the grave nomenclature of BLOCK CAPITALS, endless sinister “on
or about” events and 99 numbered paragraphs of
particulars, the true bill (charging document) is actually just a
random catalogue of social media trivia like the above “Woke
Blacks” post.

Most
of the cited gleanings amounted to crude word bombs, often in
broken English, that presumably even Kim Kardashian’s 59 million
Twitter followers could see through.

“Hillary
is a Satan, and her crimes and lies
 had proved
just how evil she is”

The
lion’s share of these postings and ads probably disappeared into
cyberspace like the sound of a falling tree in an empty
forest, anyway. According to Facebook itself, the seemingly
ubiquitous social media ad campaign despicted in the indictment
was nothing of the kind. It actually amounted to
just 
3,000 placements
at a cost of 
$100,000—more
than half of which were purchased after the election,
and 
25% of
which ended-up in its dead letter office (unread).

Likewise, the
handful of efforts to actually stimulate pro-Trump rallies in
Florida and elsewhere were abject failures. As we document
below, the Russians had absolutely no “ground game” in the
US and any third-rate campaign consultant will tell you that ads
alone do not produce crowds. In fact, there is virtually no evidence
that anyone showed up at the rallies cited by Mueller.

Besides,
the overwhelming share of the pro-Trump social media postings
uncovered by Mueller’s sleuths amounted to “copy and paste”
relays of current partisan talking points. Thus, the
indictment cites such slogans as:

           “Vote
Republican, vote Trump, and support the Second Amendment!”.

“Trump
is our only hope for a better future!”

“Donald
wants to defeat terrorism… Hillary wants to sponsor it”

Really?

It
took a clandestine nest of Russkie imposters and subversives to
pollute the social media with this kind of tripe?


In
fact, RNC, Fox News and the Trump campaign were
already saturating the internet with these messages,
anyway—-along with millions of pro-Trump social medi activists.  T
he 80 Russian operatives
cited by Mueller didn’t add one damn bit to the massive social media
messaging that was already out there.

So
here’s the joker in the whole deck. It seems that the
nefarious”troll farm” in St. Petersburg that comprises
nearly the totality of Mueller’s case is not a Russian
intelligence agency operation at all.


Instead,
it’s the relatively harmless Hobby Farm of a fanatical
Russian oligarch and ultra-nationalist, Yevgeny Prigozhin, who
has a great big beef against Imperial Washington’s demonization
of Russia and Vlad Putin. Apparently, the farm
 was (it’s
apparently being disbanded) the vehicle through which he gave
Washington the middle finger and buttered up his patron.

Prigozhin
is otherwise known as “Putin’s Cook” because he made his
fortune in St. Petersburg restaurants that Putin favored and via
state funded food service operations at Russian schools and military
installations. Like most Russian oligarchs not in jail, he
apparently tithes in gratitude to the Kremlin: In this
case, by bankrolling the rinky-dink operation at 55
Savushkina Street in St Petersburg that is the object of Mueller’s
pretentious foray into the flotsam and jetsam of social media
low life.

Prigozhin’s
trolling farm is grandly called the Internet Research Agency
(IRA), but what it actually does is hire (apparently) unemployed
20-somethings at $4-8 per hour to pound out
ham-handed political messaging on social media sites like
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube etc. They bang away twelve
hours at a shift on a quota-driven
paint-by-the-internet-numbers basis where their output is rated for
engagements, likes, retweets etc.


Whatever
these keyboard drones might be, they are not professional Russian
intel operators
. And
the collection of broken English postings strewn throughout the
indictment are not one bit scary.


Indeed,
the utterly stupid naiveté of the whole St.
Petersburg operation is crystalized by this episode when the
farm purportedly garnered some startling political insight from
an unwitting Trump campaign official in Texas:

80.
On or about August 19, 2016, Defendants and their co-conspirators
used the false U.S. persona “Matt Skiber” account to write
to the real U.S. person affiliated with a Texas-based grassroots
organization who previously had advised the false persona to focus
on 
“purple
states like Colorado, Virginia & Florida
.”
Defendants and their co-conspirators told that U.S. person, 
We
were thinking about your recommendation to focus on purple states and
this is what we’re organizing in FL.”

Jez
Louise and goodness gracious, too. Who coulda thunk as early
as August that Colorado, Virginia and Florida would be swing
states!


In
any event, even Mueller’s indictment proves that the farm was
strictly amateurville. None of the other 12 Russians charged
has an intelligence background, either.

Thus,
the CEO is a retired St. Petersburg police officer. The
executive director is a 31-year old website developer and
internet PR promoter who previously had garnered small beans
contracts ($4k-20k each) from St. Petersburg agencies to publish
municipal newspapers, make video reports about their activities or
promote local programs such as one on “tolerance and
prevention of drug addiction”.


Likewise,
two more of the operatives were graduates students in IT and
advertising at St. Petersburg universities.

Then
there is the husband/wife duo, Maria and Robert Bovda, who were
the original heads of the US focused “translator project”.
Both were recent graduates in psychology from local
universities, where Robert’s 2011 thesis had been on
“The Effects of Social-Support Conditions On
Loneliness As Experienced By the Elderly”.


We can’t
help but think they had not yet become hardened spies when
the joined IRA in November 2013 and apparently 
left
in October 2014
. Whatever
they did during their tenure at the farm, cooking up ways to
help Donald Trump’s not yet announced campaign was surely
not among them, but still apparently enough to help fill out
Mueller’s indictment roster.

             Maria Bovda was the 'head' of the translator project, the designated branch of the wider pro-Putin effort which focused on US audiences. She worked there between November 2013 and October 2014
Her husband Robert acted beneath her as the second in charge of the 'translator' project and worked at the company over the same dates. He too is accused of trying to enter the US under false pretenses to collect information but he did not obtain a visa and could not make the trip


Another
was Dzheykhun Aslanov, who was head of the “American department”
and had graduated in 2012 from the Russian State Hydrometeorological
University in St. Petersburg. He had studied economics
and 
wildlife
management!

Likewise,
nowhere in the entire 37 pages is there even a clause linking
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm to the SVR (foreign intelligence service), the
FSB (counter-intelligence and anti-terrorism), the GRU (military
intelligence service), any other agency of the Russian State—-or
even some purported Kremlin back channel to Putin.

Yet
there is every reason to believe that the entire Russian meddling
narrative cooked up by the partisan hacks in Obama’s inner
circle—-John Brennan, Susan Rice and Ben Rhodes—-was based on the
amateurish machinations originating in the nondescript building
pictured below.

As
we will show, the Hobby Farm was no Russian state secret
or clandestine vehicle of its intelligence community. To the
contrary, it had been fully covered in the Russian press for
years as one of numerous such oligarch funded projects designed
to glorify the Putin regime and vilify the Russian opposition.


It
had also been the subject of a lengthy expose in 
The
Guardian
 
of
London, as well as other western media. Even Radio Free Europe
had done a lengthy profile.


All
of this had happened long before Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm
had turned its attentions to US politics. Indeed, the IRA’s
pivot to the US in April 2014 occurred well before Trump’s
candidacy was gleam in anyone’s eye except his own, but 
after a
seminal event had occurred which Mueller’s comic book
narrative completely ignores.


To
wit, what apparently riled up Prigozhin was Washington’s
heavy-handed meddling in the politics of Ukraine during the US
funded and enabled coup on the streets of Kiev in February 2014.

Never
mind that the incumbent pro-Russian government had come to power in
an honest election and had chosen to take a more
attractive economic deal from Moscow than was being offered
by the West. 

Also ignore that fact that Ukraine was Russia’s
next door neighbor and had been an essential element of Greater
Russia—sometimes a full fledged constituent state—for more
than 700 years.

Likewise,
when Crimea elected by 90% referendum vote to “rejoin”
Russia, it didn’t happen at gunpoint. Crimea is 85% Russian and
had been an integral part of the Russian state ever since it
was purchased from the Turks by Catherine the Great for
good money in 1783.

Thereafter,
its major port city of Sevastopol had functioned as the homeport
for Russia’s Black Sea fleet under Czars and Commissars alike.
The only real reason it needed to “rejoin” Russia in March
2014 was because the Ukrainian tyrant who ruled the Soviet Union in
the 1950s, Nikita Khrushchev, had gifted it to his
Ukrainian compatriots during a drunken celebration of his
victory over two deadly rivals who also claimed Stalin’s succession.

Indeed,
when Obama’s neocon Assistant Secretary for European Affairs,
Victoria Nuland, was caught telling the American ambassador in Kiev
that “Yats is the guy” with respect to the new Washington
designated leader of the post-coup government and joined a
chorus of Washington-based vilification of Putin and the Russian
government, the die was cast.

Russian
nationalists like Prigozhin were not going to take it lying down. As
we document below, then and there he began to shift some of the
activities of his trolling farm toward the US.

It amounted
to a tit-for-tat response to the anti-Russian propaganda emanating
from the Washington funded NGOs in Kiev; and also from outright
government agencies like the National Endowment for Democracy
and Radio Free Europe, as well as the Deep State
subservient operations of CNN and its print media imitators.

That
shift was described as the “translator project” by
Mueller’s historically ignorant lawyers. The implication was that out
of sheer aggression the Kremlin had unilaterally decided to
attack America’s democratic process through the IRA.

In
fact, the overwhelming likelihood is that an arriviste
Russian billionaire got a bee in his bonnet after Washington’s
Ukrainian coup–and then went to town on America with his trolling
farm exactly as he and many others had been doing in internal
Russian politics for years.

From
the point of view of US/Russian relations and world peace, however,
the re-direction of activity at Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm could
not have come at a worse time. Its wholly open and widely known
operations permitted Obama’s hatchet-people to quickly seize
on the IRA’s new theatre of focus as evidence of a
massive Russian attack on America’s election process, thereby turning
a molehill into a mountain.

At
length, the partisan leaders of Obama’s national security team,
led by the detestable John Brennan at the
CIA, selectively coopted and abused the resources and
credibility of the vast US intelligence apparatus to put the
imprimatur of a national security threat upon what was in fact
a scary bedtime story of no real significance. That effort
culminated in the phony intelligence assessment published
by four US intel agencies in January 2017 based on the work
of Brennan’s “hand-picked” accomplices.

In
what is surely a fabulous irony, therefore, the Internet
Research Agency amounts to a reverse Potemkin Village. It wasn’t
much to look at and was nothing to worry about until Obama’s
national security posse falsely embellished it’s innocuous
façade into a mortal threat to American democracy and national
security.

And
then Robert Mueller brought in his gang of copywriters and
illustrators to turn this entire tall tale into CNN-ready “news”.

We
will demonstrate below that what happened in this building was a
complete farce and posed no threat to the security and liberty of the
American people whatsoever; nor did it even remotely impact the 2016
election process.


But
with his comic book indictment, Robert Mueller has actually made
himself a mortal threat to America’s democracy and national security
.
That’s because his indictment is unleashing a rabid
anti-Russian mania in the Democratic party and turning flaming
liberals and leftwing progressives, who used to form the backbone of
the peace party in America, into outright war-mongers.

The
Donald tweeted over the weekend about Moscow “laughing its ass
off”  about the Mueller indictment, but we think he
missed the mark. It is the Deep State on the banks of the Potomac
that is bursting with glee—literally licking its collective
chops— about the endless budget boondoggles now assured to be 

coming its way.


The
neocons and military/industrial complex had already
taken control of the GOP lock, stock and barrel. Then,
his campaign rhetoric about “America First”
notwithstanding, Trump abdicated to his empire-minded generals
in order to concentrate on his Twitter account. And now in the
wake of the RussiaGate hysteria being given a powerful new
boost from Mueller’s comic book, the Dems are lining up to say
we will see your 
$700
billion
 budget
and crank it up from there.


The
truth is, there is a screaming fiscal crisis coming hard upon
Imperial Washington. That’s owing to the 
$15
trillion
 of
new deficits that are now built-in for the next decade—at the very
time when the Fed has shut down is massive bond-buying
experiment and the Baby Boom is hitting the social security and
medicare rolls in droves.

Absent
the RussiaGate hoax and the Dems descent into mindless, anti-Putin
hysteria, there would have been a moment of maximum danger for
the Deep State’s hideously inflated military, intelligence and
surveillance operations. In the coming battle against fiscal
collapse, they surely would have been on the fiscal chopping
block like at no time since the aftermath of Vietnam in the 1970s.

But rescue
is now at hand. The Dems have been shell-shocked ever
since the evening of November 8, 2016, and have worked
themselves into deliriums about how it was all a big mistake
enabled by Russian meddling and collusion with the Trump
campaign.

To
a substantial degree, however, those narratives were on their last
legs until the Mueller indictment came along. For anyone who takes
the trouble to read it, of course, it’s just a potpourri of
nonsense, marginalia and irrelevance.

But
the Dems had already gone brain dead on the RussiaGate matter—so
they are now greeting it as a “blockbuster”, as
are the talking heads of CNN and the mainstream media. Consequently,
the drivel that came out of the building pictured below is being
taken as evidence of a far-reaching attack on America that
even rivals Pearl Harbor. As Pat Buchanan noted:

          This
Russian troll farm is “the equivalent (of) Pearl Harbor,”
says Cong. Jerrold Nadler, who would            head up the House Judiciary
Committee, handling any impeachment, if Democrats retake the                    House.

When
MSNBC’s Chris Hayes pressed, Nadler doubled down: The Russians “are
destroying our democratic process.” While the Russian trolling
may not equal Pearl Harbor in its violence, said Nadler, in its
“seriousness, it is very much on a par” with Japan’s
surprise attack.

That’s
right. But unlike the vast Japanese naval armada that stealthily
steamed toward Hawaii in early December 1941, the Facebook
cyber-missiles that allegedly hit America in 2016 came out of
this little joint hiding in plain sight:

55 Savushkina Street, St Petersburg, said to be the headquarters of Russia’s ‘troll army’

So
let’s return to the fact that Prigozhin’s troll farm
doesn’t really look much different than countless others that dot the
Russian internet landscape, and which mushroomed after 2011 in
support of the Putin-ified Russian state and the crony
capitalist economy it shepherds.


New
Yorker
 piece
published by journalist Adrian Chen, no fan of Donald Trump, in
late July 2016 explains about as well as any where the Internet
Research Agency came from:

           The
(Internet Research Agency) has been widely reported in Russian
media to be the brainchild                of Evgeny Prigozhin, an oligarch and ally
of Vladimir Putin. At the time, it employed hundreds of                Russians in a
nondescript office building in St. Petersburg, where they produced
blog posts,                      comments, infographics, and viral videos that pushed the
Kremlin’s narrative on both the Russian              and English Internet.

The
agency is what is known in Russia as a “troll farm,” a nickname
given to outfits that operate armies of sock-puppet social-media
accounts, in order to create the illusion of a rabid grass-roots
movement. Trolling has become a key tool in a comprehensive effort by
Russian authorities to rein in a previously freewheeling Internet
culture, after huge anti-Putin protests in 2011 were organized
largely over social media. It is used by Kremlin apparatchiks at
every level of government in Russia; wherever politics are discussed
online, one can expect a flood of comments from paid trolls.

The
real effect, the Russian activists told me, was not to brainwash
readers but to overwhelm social media with a flood of fake
content, 
seeding
doubt and paranoia, and destroying the possibility of using the
Internet as a democratic space…..

…….toward
the end of last year (2015) I noticed something interesting:
many had begun to promote right-wing news outlets, portraying
themselves as conservative voters who were, increasingly, fans of
Donald Trump. Exposure to even small amounts of Russian politics can
induce severe bouts of paranoia and conspiracy-minded thinking, and
it seemed logical to me that this new pro-Trump bent might well be an
attempt by the agency to undermine the U.S. by helping to elect a
racist reality-show star as our Commander-in-Chief. At the time, I
found it funny. 
The
agency was a well-funded but often hapless operation—it created a
cartoon character that was a giant buttocks to spread anti-Obama
propaganda, for example—and this seemed like another of its
far-fetched schemes to poison the Internet.

In
fact, it was. How it became a fearsome Russian intel operation was
entirely due to what happened in Washington DC, not St. Petersburg
or the Kremlin, for that matter.

That
is, in the summer of 2016, when the Obama inner circle and the
Deep State national security establishment alike suddenly were
confronted with the theretofore unthinkable prospect that Donald
Trump might actually be elected US President, they literally
transformed the Hobby Farm of a second tier
Russian oligarch into monumental threat to American
democracy.

And
that took some doing because Prigozhin was essentially a nobody
in the great scheme of national security. Unlike Putin, who cut
his eyeteeth in the old Soviet era KGB, Prigozhin had fancied himself
a ski racer as a privileged young man in a Soviet boarding school.
Failing to make the grade on the slopes, however, he had
subsequently pursued various petty criminal schemes that
landed him nine years in a Soviet prison during the latter’s
dying days.

But
timing is everything—-so when he opened a hot dog stand from
his mother’s kitchen in newly liberated St. Petersburg in the
early 1990s his entprenurial talents in the culinary field
self-evidently flourished. Soon he branched into
convenience stores and then in 1996 into a swank restaurant
(Staraya Tamozhnya or “The Old Customs House”) that
catered to newly monied Russian who were looking for “more than
cutlets with Vodka”.

At
length, a strategic $400k investment in a rusting harbor boat
was turned into a floating hot spot called “The New Island
Restaurant”. From there flowed catering contracts
for lavish state banquets after he gained the
gastronomical favor of the post-Soviet St. Petersburg
political operative, who became prime minister of Russia.


Putin held lavish
state dinners on Prigozhin’s floating emporium, where
he played host to world leaders like George W. Bush and Jacques
Chirac. He also apparently heaped business into Prigozhin’s budding
empire with a $177 million catering contract with Moscow’s schools,
and then the real jackpot: A two year contract in 2012 worth
more than 
$1.6
billion
 to
supply 90% of all food orders to Russian soldiers.

Folks,
that’s where the troll factory came from. It opened the
next year in 2013 as the kind of token of appreciation expected
from oligarchs favored by the Russian state.

Still,
it wasn’t the KGB incarnate—just a tweet-by-the-numbers body
shop designed to flood Russian media and internet
forums with messages extolling Russian greatness, the iniquities and
hypocrisies of the morally corrupt West and the glorious
works of Vlad Putin.


At
this stage the troll farm was involved in strictly Russian
business—-the handiwork of an oligarch who had thrived on Russia’s
particular brand of crony capitalism and was more than happy to shill
for his patron in the Kremlin.


Here
is how the previously referenced 
Guardian
article from mid-2015 described the farm before some of its
modest resources were later shifted to the “American
Department” in 2016:

          Just
after 9pm each day, a long line of workers files out of 55 Savushkina
Street, a modern four-                storey office complex with a small sign outside
that reads “Business centre”. Having spent 12                    hours in the
building, the workers are replaced by another large group, who will
work through the              night.

They
painted a picture of a work environment that was humourless and
draconian, with fines for being a few minutes late or not reaching
the required number of posts each day. Trolls worked in rooms of
about 20 people, each controlled by three editors, who would check
posts and impose fines if they found the words had been cut and
pasted, or were ideologically deviant.

The
LiveJournal blogger, who spent two months working at the centre until
mid-March, said she was paid 45,000 roubles ($790) a month, to run a
number of accounts on the site.

We
had to write ‘ordinary posts’, about 
making
cakes or music tracks
 we
liked, but then every now and then throw in a
 political
post
 about
how the Kiev government is fascist, or that sort of thing,” she
said.

Scrolling
through one of the LiveJournal accounts she ran, the pattern is
clear. There are posts about “Europe’s 20 most beautiful castles”
and “signs that show you are dating the wrong girl”, interspersed
with political posts about 
Ukraine or
suggesting that the Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny is
corrupt.

The
desired conclusion of one reads: “The majority of experts agree
that the US is deliberately trying to weaken Russia, and Ukraine is
being used only as a way to achieve this goal. If the Ukrainian
people had not panicked and backed a coup, the west would have found
another way to pressure Russia. But our country is not going to go
ahead with the US plans, and we will fight for our sovereignty on the
international stage.”

To
add colour to their posts, websites have been set up to aid the troll
army. One features 
thousands
of pasteable images
,
mainly of European leaders in humiliating photoshopped incidents or
with captions pointing out their weakness and stupidity, or showing
Putin making hilarious wisecracks and winning the day.

When
I got the job there in 2013 it was a small building, I was working in
the basement, and it was clear they didn’t have enough space,”
said Andrei Soshnikov, a St Petersburg journalist who infiltrated the
company two years ago and has continued to cover it. 
He
linked the move to a much bigger office with increased online
activity around the Ukraine crisis….

As
we explained above, it was only after Washington massively
intervened in the domestic politics of Ukraine in February 2104 that
Prigozhin’s Hobby Farm branched into external operations
focused on Russian adversaries like the new anti-Russian Ukrainian
government and the United States.


Even
then, however, the main stream media headline writers, who
have been intellectually lobotomized by a constant diet of
anti-Russian mania, cannot seem to grasp that their hyperbolic
headlines are in no way, shape or form supported by the actual
written words in Mueller’s indictment.


In
a word, 
eighty twenty-somethings
sitting cheek-by-jowl at banks of computer screens and banging out
social media tripe in English as a (third) language did not
impact anything in America, let alone the 2016 election outcome.


That
is to say, what in the world is so hard to understand about the fact
that the pathetic output of this group could not have amounted
to 
0.000001% of
the content that rumbled through these social media channels
during 2016?


Yet
here is Mueller—writing in indictment black and
white—admitting that the troll farm had deployed precious few
trolls to the American department:

“spread
(ing) distrust towards the candidates and the political
system in general…..By approximately July 2016, more
than 
eighty
ORGANIZATION employees
 were
assigned to the translator project”.

Besides
the infinitesimal volume and generally crude and unoriginal nature of
the troll farm’s output, this tiny 80-person contingent points to
another huge flaw in the entire Mueller narrative—especially
as it has been embellished and exaggerated by the main stream media
since last Friday afternoon. To wit, all of these posts were destined
to get lost in the vast sea of cyberspace without a 
ground
game
 in
the US.


Yet
the indictment is clear on that crucial point as well.
The Russian meddlers had “no ground game”
whatsoever aside from a 22 day visit in June 2014 by two
operatives who were not trained spies and who had apparently
never even been to America previously.


Yet
they visited nine states during that brief interval and
thereby “cased-out” the entirety of the American
electoral scene:

Only
KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA received visas, and from approximately June 4,
2014 through June 26, 2014, KRYLOVA and BOGACHEVA traveled in and
around the United States, including stops in Nevada, California, New
Mexico, Colorado, Illinois, Michigan, Louisiana, Texas, and New York
to gather intelligence. After the trip, KRYLOVA and BURCHIK exchanged
an intelligence report regarding the trip.

The
above paragraph is itself a smoking bratwurst!


Aside
from sleeping, passing through countless airports, checking into a
dozen or more hotels and 

perhaps visiting the chamber of Commerce in
Dallas or Denver, what possibly could these two travelers have done
to lay the groundwork for “influencing” 133
million voters two years hence?


Mueller
doesn’t say and the talking heads jabber on about this trip as
if it were some kind of invasion, not the
pointless needle-in-the-haystack type of undertaking that it
actually was.


And
that gets us to the ballyhooed efforts to organize and promote Trump
rallies in Florida, Washington DC, New York City and elsewhere. Once
again, however, Mueller spills large amounts of ink citing the emails
and social media posts that describe the aims of these long-distance
media trolls. But there is not a shred of evidence presented
about what actually happened on the ground.


We
would be so bold as to suggest that we know why Mueller didn’t
document this core element of the alleged meddling campaign.
Namely, because nobody came to the rallies and flash mob events
called for by the keyboard jockeys in St. Petersburg.


Take
the case of the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies on August 20,
which the indictment dwells on at length. So doing, it purports to
explain how real Trump supporters in the state were duped into
cooperating, how bloggers back in Russia used social media posts to
promote 13 rallies across the state of Florida and bought ads to the
same end on Facebook.


In
fact, compared to fleeting references with respect to similar rallies
allegedly staged in Washington DC and New York City, the Florida
rallies take up far more ink in the indictment and come across as
exhibit #1  on Russia ground game in the US election
process.


Indeed,
the liberal hatch-people at 
Politico made
the singular importance of the Florida meddling operation
abundantly clear:

But
the document makes clear that the operation in Florida, the nation’s
largest swing state, was in a class by itself. The indictment is
packed with details of how Russian nationals duped Donald Trump
campaign volunteers and grass-roots organizations in Florida into
holding rallies they organized and helped fund with foreign cash.

Here’s
the problem. There seems to be scant evidence that these rallies
actually happened or that anyone showed up to the ones that did
occur. For instance, here is a photo of one in St. Petersburg
(Florida) posted on social media at the time.


We
doubt whether Vlad got his money’s worth on this one:

ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Then
there’s the case of Jim Frishe of Clearwater, Florida. He was a
real estate development consultant and candidate for county
office, who organized a sign-waving event in response to the Russian
entreaties that attracted barely a dozen people:

           Frishe,
68, said he was called by someone identifying themselves as with a
group called                 “Florida for Trump” and asked to organize a
sign-waving rally. He said between 15 and 18               people showed up and
that he didn’t receive any signs or money or other support. He                     never heard from them again.

“I
was going to do what I was going to do anyway. I was a Trump
supporter, they didn’t convince me”.

Then
there is the case of the “Hillary in stripes” caper
allegedly promoted by the Russians. According to the indictment:

           For
example, defendants and their co-conspirators asked one U.S. person
to build a cage on on               a flatbed truck … and another U.S. person to
wear a costume portraying Clinton in a prison                       uniform,”

The
thing is, the main evidence for that is that the “cage”
appeared about a month later as the handiwork of a Trump supporter,
Gary Howd, who did it all on his own–without any prompting,
encouragement or money from the Russians.


Even
the Politico account of the purported Florida invasion by the
Russians let that much slip out:

          The
caged Clinton stunt was a hit among Trump supporters. On Sept. 23,
for                                      instance,
 NBC2 reported
that a Cape Coral man erected a caged Clinton display in his front            yard.

“I
feel like I’m doing my little part at least in my little neck of the
woods,” homeowner Gary Howd said.

As
it happened, even the 
Washington
Post
 admits
that the “Florida Goes Trump” rallies didn’t amount to
much.

          The
efforts in Florida that August day did not turn out to be
particularly impressive. No people                    showed up to at least one of the
proposed rallies, and online photos of some of the other events                reveal ragtag groups with Trump signs staking out patches of grass or
traffic medians.

As
to the “Down With Hillary” demonstration on July 23, 2016,
to take another example, here is what you get from Google on this
particular element of the indictment:

          No
results found for 
“Down
with Hillary” rally in New York City on July 23, 2016
.

Finally,
and as long was we are on the topic, here is what a real troll farm
looks like. Yet this vast suite of offices in Fort
Meade, Maryland, where 20,000 SIGINT spies and technicians work
for the NSA, is only the tip of the iceberg.


The
US actually spends 
$75
billion
 per
year—more than Russia’s entire 
$69
billion 
defense
budget—spying on and meddling in the politics of virtually
every nation on earth. An outfit within NSA called Tailored Access
Operations (TAO) has a multi-billion annual budget and does
nothing put troll the global internet and does so
with highly educated, highly paid professionals, not $4 per
hour keyboard jockeys.


Indeed,
the cafeterias in the NSA buildings pictured below cost far
more per year to operate than did Prigozhin’s troll farm during it
entire short lived existence (its apparently now being closed down
with two of the 3.5 floors already dark).

NSA headquarters

In
that context, Charles Hugh Smith cogently reminds that the real
farce in the Mueller comic book is that it is the ultimate case of
the pot-calling-the-kettle black:

America’s
foreign policy is one of absolute entitlement to influence the
domestic affairs and politics of every nation of interest, which to a
truly global empire includes every nation on the planet to the degree
every nation is a market and/or a potential threat to U.S. interests.

Assassination
of elected leaders–no problem. Funding the emergence of new
U.S.-directed political parties–just another day at the office.
Inciting dissent and discord to destabilize regimes–it’s what we do,
folks. Funding outright propaganda–one of our enduring specialties
.

Finally,
as Pat Buchanan further observed in his post on the Mueller
indictment, political and election meddling is what Imperial
Washington does. And now we are surprised that others do the
same—-even that pathetic efforts of a Russian oligarch laid out in
Mueller’s ham sandwich indictment:

Are
the CIA and National Endowment for Democracy under orders not to try
to influence the outcome of elections in nations in whose ruling
regimes we believe we have a stake?

“Have
we ever tried to meddle in other countries’ elections?” Laura
Ingraham asked former CIA Director James Woolsey this weekend.

With
a grin, Woolsey replied, “Oh, probably.”

“We
don’t do that anymore though?” Ingraham interrupted. “We
don’t mess around in other people’s elections, Jim?”

“Well,”
Woolsey said with a smile. “Only for a very good cause.”

Indeed,
what is the National Endowment for Democracy all about, if not aiding
the pro-American side in foreign nations and their elections?

Did
America have no active role in the “color-coded revolutions”
that have changed regimes from Serbia to Ukraine to Georgia?

When
Republicans discuss Iran on Capitol Hill, the phrase “regime
change” is frequently heard. When the “Green Revolution”
took to the streets of Tehran to protest massively the re-election of
President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in 2009, Republicans denounced
President Obama for not intervening more energetically to alter the
outcome.

When
China, Russia and Egypt expel NGOs, are their suspicions that some
have been seeded with U.S. agents merely marks of paranoia?

David
Stockman’s Contra Corner is the only place where mainstream delusions
and cant about the Warfare State, the Bailout State, Bubble Finance
and Beltway Banditry are ripped, refuted and
rebuked.
http://davidstockmanscontracorner.com

=========================

Zie ook:

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands; zie ook de links in dat bericht)

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

Het volgende artikle vond ik op het blog van Stan van Houcke, die het overnam van LewRockwell.com.

In dit artikel legt Paul Craig Roberts uit, dat ‘Russiagate’ een complot tegen Trump is en werd uitgevoerd door de CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het Democratic National Committee (DNC). 

Trump vormde een gevaar voor de macht en budgetten van het militair-industrieel complex, daar hij de relatie met Rusland wilde normaliseren, hetzelfde Rusland dat onder Obama nog werd afgeschilderd als ‘Amerika’s meest gevaarlijke vijand…..’ Het militair-industrieel complex heeft zoveel mogelijk ‘conflicten’ (oorlogen en dreiging van oorlogen) nodig om haar macht en de enorme winsten te behouden……..

Daarnaast vormde Trump een bedreiging voor de grote geldstromen die de Clinton Foundation genereerde en de beide Clintons (Bill en Hillary) zou dwarszitten bij het worden van multimiljonairs…..

Lees het volgende artikel van Roberts en laat je niet langer wijsmaken dat Rusland de VS presidentsverkiezingen (en verkiezingen elders) zou hebben gemanipuleerd dan wel manipuleert!*

anti-state
anti-war pro-market

Rosenstein
and Mueller Running for Cover Leaving Brennan Exposed

By Paul
Craig Roberts

PaulCraigRoberts.org

February
19, 2018

Now
the Deputy Attorney General Rosenstein confirms what I told you in my
previous post. 
Mueller
found no evidence
 that
Russia had any impact on the outcome of the 2016 election.

So
what was Russiagate all about?

It
was exactly, precisely what I told you it was about from the very
begining. It was a conspiracy orchestrated by the military/security
complex, CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic National
Committee against Donald Trump.

Trump’s
emphasis during his presidential campaign on normalizing relations
with Russia, which the neocon Obama regime had turned into “America’s
most dangerous enemy,” was a threat to the power and budgets of the
military/security complex. Without a demonized enemy, what is the
justification for a 1,000 billion annual budget and the laws passed
in the 21st century that completely destroy the protections provided
by the US Constitution?

From
the Clinton/DNC standpoint, a Trump victory would halt the vast
riches pouring into the Clinton/DNC pockets from “pay to play.”
The Clinton Foundation and the Clintons themselves were on their way
to both being billionaires with the DNC collecting the registration
fees. This was a model for one party rule. And along comes Donald
Trump.

I
doubt Trump knew what he was stepping into. So far he has been unable
to function as President. But now that the FISA** court has on record
Rosenstein and Comey’s confessions that the spy warrants requested
by the FBI to spy on Trump are based on deception of the court, the
conspirators against Trump face indictment, conviction, and prison,
if Trump has the balls, which he might not have. We cannot even be
sure Trump understands the situation.

What
perhaps has surely happened is that former CIA director John Brennan
is now exposed by the total failue of Mueller to find a Trump/Putin
conspiracy against American democracy. Rosenstein’s statement that
“there is no allegation in [Mueller’s] indictment that any
American was a knowing particiipant in this illegal activity [illegal
activity is an unsubstantiated assertion only]. There is no
allegation in the indictment that the [Russians’] conduct altered
the outcome of the election.”

Brennan
as CIA director had lied under oath to Congress to the contrary.

Rosenstein
and Comey are trapped in their confessions to the FISA court that the
FBI obtained spy warrants from the court via deception of the court.
See 
here.

What
we must ask ourselves is how it is possible in the Great American
Democracy that people totally devoid of all integrity, all honesty,
all respect for truth can be confirmed by the US Senate as heads of
the CIA, FBI, and National Intelligence?

How
is it possible that these utterly corrupt people can go before the
House and Senate continuously and tell lies under oath and never be
held accountable?

How
is it possible that American Democracy is so utterly weak that
nothing whatsoever can be done about it?

What
kind of America is it when it is ruled by blatant transparant lies?

In
what sense do The People exist?

The
Best of Paul Craig Roberts

Paul
Craig Roberts, a former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury and
former associate editor of the Wall Street Journal, has been
reporting shocking cases of prosecutorial abuse for two decades. A
new edition of his book, 
The
Tyranny of Good Intentions
,
co-authored with Lawrence Stratton, a documented account of how
americans lost the protection of law, has been released by Random
House. Visit 
his
website
.

Copyright © 2018 Paul
Craig Roberts

Previous
article by Paul Craig Roberts:  
Russia
Is in the Crosshairs

Why
I Could Never Get an FBI Security Clearance

==================================

*  Voor het tegenovergestelde, de lange rij van VS bemoeienissen bij verkiezingen elders zie: ‘Former CIA Chief Admits US Meddles in Foreign Elections… For Their Own Good‘ (later zal ik hier nog een bericht over brengen)

** FISA: Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (uit 1978)

Zie ook:

Geen rectificaties voor meer dan 2 jaar brengen van fake news over het kwaadaardig sprookje Russiagate

Britse militaire geheime dienst bedient zich van moddergooien en andere manipulaties om Europese en VS politiek te manipuleren, zo blijkt uit gelekte documenten

‘Fake news’: alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn

Two More Spiegel Employees Out After Fake News Scandal Expands‘ Ofwel: het zoveelste ‘gevalletje fake news’, gebracht door de reguliere massamedia……..

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

Russiagate gelovigen krijgen nieuwe klap: WikiLeaks kreeg de DNC mails van een klokkenluider, niet van Rusland…..

De verregaande anti-Russische propaganda in de VS en de rest van het westen

WhatsApp beperking in strijd tegen fake news

Als Martin Luther King nog zou leven was hij onderwerp van censuur en was zijn Facebook pagina verwijderd

World Economic Forum: de plek waar men elkaar feliciteert met de censuur op de sociale media

Massamedia VS vallen keihard door de mand met ‘vers’ geschoten Russiagate bok >> publiek wordt om vertrouwen gevraagd

Jacht in VS op alternatief (echt) nieuws in volgend stadium: journalist wordt vastgehouden zonder aanklacht

Lichtgelovige ‘atheïst’ gelooft Russiagate leugens….

NewsGuard, het nieuwste wapen van Big Brother VS tegen de alternatieve media

Netflix censureert aflevering van humoristisch programma, ‘na een geldig verzoek’ op grond van Saoedische wetgeving….

Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots

‘Fake news’: alternatieve media en bloggers in het westen zouden onzin brengen, echter niet als dit soort groepen wat roepen in landen die het westen niet welgevallig zijn

Waarom de burgers van de VS de illegale oorlogen steunen

Democraten deden zich voor als Russen in false flag operatie om Roy Moore (Republikein) zwart te maken tijdens verkiezing…..

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….‘ (zie ook de verdere links over Russiagate in dat bericht)

Russiagate en Assange: The Guardian wordt nu zelfs door collega’s voor zot uitgemaakt

The Guardian: ondanks een enorme misser (fake news) gaat men door met de valse beschuldigingen t.a.v. Assange……

     

 ‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen‘ (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!


Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

CIA de ware hacker en manipulator van verkiezingen, ofwel de laatste Wikileaks documenten……...’

CIA speelt zoals gewoonlijk vuil spel: uit Wikileaks documenten blijkt dat CIA zelf de verkiezingen manipuleerde, waar het Rusland van beschuldigde……..

CIA malware voor manipulaties en spionage >> vervolg Wikileaks Vault 7

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

Russian Roulette: The Inside Story of Putin’s War on America and the Election of Donald Trump‘ (artikel in Nederlands)

Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

WannaCry niet door Noord-Korea ‘gelanceerd!’

False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Kaspersky Lab (antivirus) aangevallen met agressief ‘Grapperhaus virus’

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………‘ 

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) waarschuwt voor Koreaanse samenwerking op Olympische Spelen…….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

BBC World Service kwam vanmorgen met een waarschuwing van VS vicepresident Mike Pence voor de samenwerking tussen Noord- en Zuid-Korea op de Olympische Winterspelen die a.s. vrijdag van start gaan.

Waarvoor Pence waarschuwt? Voor kennis uit het verleden! Pence stelt dat Noord- en Zuid-Korea ook tijdens de Olympische Winterspelen van 2006 samenwerkten en tijdens die spelen deden de Noord-Koreanen voor het eerst een kernproef……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Ten eerste is het nog steeds niet duidelijk of Noord-Korea een atoombom heeft, daar niemand tot nu toe radioactieve straling heeft gemeten, boven de plek waaronder de Noord-Koreanen de kernproeven houden (tot een paar dagen na zo’n ondergrondse proef is radioactieve straling te meten boven die plek, ook te meten met satellieten…) Ten tweede: waar slaat het op? Alsof Noord-Korea voor elke ‘kernproef’ een speciale gelegenheid uitzoekt…….

De VS is in ieder geval het land dat voor haar grootschalige terreur geen speciale gelegenheden nodig heeft, dat heeft dit gestolen land al veelvuldig bewezen in het (recente) verleden…… Oh, met één uitzondering: de staatsgreep in Oekraïne, geheel ‘toevallig’ (zo de waard is vertrouwt deze zijn/haar gasten) tijdens de Olympische Winterspelen in Sotsji!! De opstand en de daarop volgende coup werd door Hillary Clinton en de CIA voorbereid, geregisseerd en betaald (met 4 miljard dollar!!)……… Uiteraard had Rusland het veel te druk met die Spelen om in de gaten te houden waar de VS mee bezig was. Al zullen er na die coup wel wat topfiguren uit de FSB (Russische geheime dienst) zijn geschopt, immers die hadden e.e.a moeten zien aankomen…..

Gezien dat laatste mogen de Noord-Koreanen wel uitkijken tijdens de komende Spelen, immers ook Zuid-Korea is tegen een aanval van de VS op Noord-Korea en heeft tijdens die Spelen vast geen tijd om in de gaten te houden wat de VS uitvreet……….

       

Mike Pence, vertegenwoordiger van de VS, de grootste terreurentiteit op onze kleine aarde……

Hier ‘wat’ feiten over VS terreur: ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States‘ (vanaf de oprichting van het middels een genocide gestolen land dat men de VS of ‘Amerika’ noemt…)

CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

Het Ron
Paul Institute (for Peace and Prosperity) publiceerde afgelopen dinsdag een
artikel van Philip Giraldi, waarin deze uitlegt hoe de CIA al 70 jaar
lang de vinger in de internationale ‘opinepap’ houdt……

Als een
geheime dienst ‘fake news’ verspreidt, noemt men dit ‘desinformatie’,
wat in het geval van landen buiten de VS onder geheime acties valt. Geheime
acties om de publieke opinie te beïnvloeden, of ‘vijandige’
regeringen te destabiliseren en uiteindelijk ten val te brengen (neem
Venezuela, Honduras, Libie, Syrië en Oekraïne)

Lees dit
uitgebreide artikel over de smerige acties die de VS en dan m.n. haar
geheime diensten speelden en spelen in onze wereld……. Russiagate
is gebleken een FBI/Clinton leugen te zijn geweest, terwijl de CIA,
FBI en Clinton aangaven dat Rusland de boel had gemanipuleerd en
gehackt, precies zoals de CIA dat al 70 jaar lang doet*, samen met economische oorlogsvoering, beproefde VS methoden om haar macht te vestigen of te
verstevigen…….

Als je
de ongebreidelde agressie van de VS ziet de laatste 70 jaar, waarbij
‘maar liefst’ meer dan 22 miljoen mensen werden vermoord**, snap je
werkelijk niet waarom men in het westen en dan m.n politici, de
reguliere media en de financiële maffia, nog steeds achter deze
grootste terreurentiteit op aarde aanlopen……..

Lees het zoveelste ontluisterden artikel (met een aantal nieuwe feiten) over terreurorganisatie CIA:

70
Years of Disinformation: How the CIA Funded Opinion Magazines in
Europe

undefined

written
by
 philip
giraldi
tuesday
january 16, 2018

When
an intelligence agency arranges to disseminated fake news it is
called “disinformation” and it is a subset of what is referred to
as covert action, basically secret operations run in a foreign
country to influence opinion or to disrupt the functioning of a
government or group that is considered to be hostile.

During
the Cold War, disinformation operations were run by many of the
leading players in both the 
North
Atlantic Treaty Organization
 and
in the opposition 
Warsaw
Pact
.
Sometimes the activity and the sponsorship were clearly visible, as
when Radio Free Europe and Radio Moscow would exchange barbs about
just how bad daily life was in the opposition alliance. Sometimes,
however, it took the form of clandestinely placing stories in the
media that were clearly untrue but designed to shift public
perceptions of what was taking place in the world. The Vietnam War
provided a perfect proxy playing field, with stories emanating from
the US government and its supporters presenting a narrative of a
fight for democracy against totalitarianism while the Communist bloc
promoted a contrary tale of colonial and capitalist oppression of a
people striving to be free.

The
Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) inherited the mantle of covert
action operations as a legacy from its OSS predecessor, which had had
considerable success in conducting disinformation operations during
World War 2. But there was from the start considerable opposition to
continuing such programs as they were both expensive and subject to
devastating blowback when they were identified and exposed. In
Western Europe, powerful domestic communist parties were quick to
publicize US intelligence missteps, but nevertheless the ability to
manipulate the news and information media to place stories critical
of the Soviets and their allies led to major programs that funded
magazines and books while also seeking to acquire a cadre of
journalists that would produce pieces on demand proved too tempting
to ignore.

There
has been considerable ex post facto examination of the CIA’s use of
covert funding mechanisms including the Congress of Cultural Freedom
to fund writers and magazines in Europe, the best known of which
were 
The
Paris Review
 and Encounter out
of London. As there was a low intensity war going on against
communism, a conflict which many patriotic writers supported, funding
magazines and finding contributors to write appropriate material was
relatively easy and hardly challenged. Some senior editors knew or
strongly suspected where their funding was coming from while some did
not, but most didn’t ask any questions because then as now patrons
of literary magazines were in short supply. Many of the writers were
in the dark about the funding, but wrote what they did because of
their own personal political convictions. The CIA, seeking value for
money, would urge certain editorial lines but was not always very
aggressive in doing so as it sought to allow the process to play out
without too much interference.

Opinion
magazines were one thing, but penetrating the newspaper world was
quite a different story. It was easy to find a low or mid-level
journalist and pay him to write certain pieces, but the pathway to
actual publication was and is more complicated than that, going as it
does through several editorial levels before appearing in print. 
A
recent book
 cites
the belief that CIA had “an agent at a newspaper in every world
capital at least since 1977” who could be directed to post or kill
stories. While it is true that US Embassies and intelligence services
had considerable ability to place stories in capitals in Latin
America and parts of Asia, the record in Europe, where I worked, was
somewhat mixed. I knew of only one senior editor of a major European
newspaper who was considered to be an Agency resource, and even he
could not place 
fake
news
 as
he was answerable both to his editorial board and the conglomerate
that owned the paper. He also refused to take a salary from CIA,
which meant that his cooperation was voluntary and he could not be
directed.

CIA did indeed have a considerable number of
journalist “assets” in Europe but they were generally stringers
or mid-level and had only limited capability to actually shape the
news. They frequently wrote for publications that had little or no
impact. Indeed, one might reasonably ask whether the support of
literary magazines in the fifties and sixties which morphed into more
direct operations seeking journalist agents had any significant
impact at all in geopolitical terms or on the Cold War itself.

More
insidious was so-called Operation Mockingbird, which began in the
early 1950s and which more-or-less openly obtained the cooperation of
major American publications and news outlets to help fight communist
“subversion.” The activity was exposed by Seymour Hersh in 1975
and was further described by the Church Commission in 1976, after
which point CIA operations to influence opinion in the United States
became illegal and the use of American journalists as agents was also
generally prohibited. It was also learned that the Agency had been
working outside its founding charter to infiltrate student groups and
antiwar organizations under Operation Chaos, run by the CIA’s
controversial if not completely crazy counterintelligence Czar
James Jesus Angleton
.

As
the wheel of government frequently ends up turning full circle, we
appear to be back in the age of disinformation, where the national
security agencies of the US government, including CIA, are now
suspected of peddling stories that are intended to influence opinion
in the United States and produce a political response. The
Steele Dossier on Donald Trump
 is
a perfect example, a report that surfaced through a deliberate series
of actions by then CIA Director John Brennan, and which was filled
with unverifiable innuendo intended to destroy the president-elect’s
reputation before he took office. It is undeniably a positive
development for all Americans who care about good governance that
Congress is now intending to investigate the dossier to determine who
ordered it, paid for it, and what it was intended to
achieve.

Reprinted
with permission from the 
American
Herald Tribune
.

==========================================

*  Uiteraard voor het digitale tijdperk niet middels hacken, zoals je begrijpt, maar o.a. met ‘false flag’ operaties, of zoals in het besproken artikel middels het beïnvloeden van de media, om zo onrust en en uiteindelijk opstanden te creëren, die moeten leiden tot een staatsgreep, waar de VS wat betreft de opstanden en staatsgrepen, niet schroomt om de regie op zich te nemen (CIA)…….

** Zie: VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….

Zie ook: ‘‘VS ‘ministerie van propaganda’ had supervisie over meer dan 800 films en minstens duizend tv series……..

Iran: moderne oorlogspropaganda ingezet door VS tegen ‘ongehoorzaam land…

VS en GB brengen propaganda die moet verdoezelen wat er echt gebeurt in Syrië…….. Door VS gebombardeerde ‘gifgasfabriek’ niet bestaand….

CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

‘Rusland heeft niets van doen met manipulaties van de VS presidentsverkiezingen via Facebook, wel maakt Facebook meer kapot dan je lief is…….

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….



Massamedia VS vergeven van CIA ‘veteranen’, alsof die media nog niet genoeg ‘fake news’ ofwel leugens brengen……..

Bang voor Amerika

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Er is al veel geschreven (althans in de alternatieve media) over de ware schuldigen achter Russiagate, met bewijzen werd en wordt aangetoond dat de geheime diensten FBI, CIA en NSA de ware schuldigen zijn achter Russiagate, waar overigens het campagneteam van hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, aanstichter en mededader is…….

Gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een artikel geschreven door Ray McGovern (ex-CIA) en gepubliceerd op de site van schrijver/journalist Paul Craig Roberts, die het overnam van Consortium News (kan je het nog volgen?). McGovern legt op een gedegen manier uit dat de FBI de ware grote dader is achter Russiagate.

Niet voor niets zegt nu zelfs de Wall Street Journal dat er een punt moet worden gezegd achter het Russiagate verhaal……. ha! Ha! Ha! Eerst liepen de persen van de Wall Street Journal zo hard op deze leugen dat ze bij wijze van spreken bijna vastliepen…….. Waar nu blijkt dat het Clinton campagneteam en de geheime diensten samen hebben gewerkt om te voorkomen dat Trump in het Witte Huis zou komen, wil deze bijna grootste krant van de VS dus een punt achter het enorme leugenverhaal dat Russiagate is………

Nogmaals toont een massamediaorgaan aan ‘fake news’ (of: nepnieuws) te hebben gebracht en daar het volk maandenlang over te hebben voorgelogen……

Lezen mensen, een geweldig stuk over dombo’s Strzak en Page, die dachten in het geheim te kunnen communiceren, maar van wie onlangs een eerste deel van hun lange correspondentie werd vrijgegeven en waardoor ten overvloede de FBI nog eens kan worden aangewezen als spin in het Russiagate web…….

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate


By Ray McGovern

January 15, 2018 Paul Craig Roberts.

As I have reported from the beginning, Russiagate is an orchestrated hoax by the security agencies for the purpose of preventing Trump from normalizing relations with Russia and, if necessary, for removing him from office. Russiagate is an act of treason by the security agencies. Those responsible must be arrested, prosecuted, and convicted. — PCR


“After months of breathless searching for ‘evidence’ of Russian-Trump collusion designed to put Trump in the White House, what now exists is actual evidence that senior officials of the Obama administration colluded to keep Trump out of the White House.” — Ray McGovern



Special Report: In the Watergate era, liberals warned about U.S. intelligence agencies manipulating U.S. politics, but now Trump-hatred has blinded many of them to this danger becoming real, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern notes. 



January 12, 2017, Information Clearing House

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48572.htm

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate


By Ray McGovern

Russia-gate is becoming FBI-gate, thanks to the official release of unguarded text messages between loose-lipped FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and his garrulous girlfriend, FBI lawyer Lisa Page. (Ten illustrative texts from their exchange appear at the end of this article.)

Despite his former job as chief of the FBI’s counterintelligence section, Strzok had the naive notion that texting on FBI phones could not be traced. Strzok must have slept through “Security 101.” Or perhaps he was busy texting during that class. Girlfriend Page cannot be happy at being misled by his assurance that using office phones would be a secure way to conduct their affair(s).

It would have been unfortunate enough for Strzok and Page to have their adolescent-sounding texts merely exposed, revealing the reckless abandon of star-crossed lovers hiding (they thought) secrets from cuckolded spouses, office colleagues, and the rest of us. However, for the never-Trump plotters in the FBI, the official release of just a fraction (375) of almost 10,000 messages does incalculably more damage than that.

We suddenly have documentary proof that key elements of the U.S. intelligence community were trying to short-circuit the U.S. democratic process. And that puts in a new and dark context the year-long promotion of Russia-gate. It now appears that it was not the Russians trying to rig the outcome of the U.S. election, but leading officials of the U.S. intelligence community, shadowy characters sometimes called the Deep State.

More of the Strzok-Page texting dialogue is expected to be released. And the Department of Justice Inspector General reportedly has additional damaging texts from others on the team that Special Counsel Robert Mueller selected to help him investigate Russia-gate.

Besides forcing the removal of Strzok and Page, the text exposures also sounded the death knell for the career of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, in whose office some of the plotting took place and who has already announced his plans to retire soon.

But the main casualty is the FBI’s 18-month campaign to sabotage candidate-and-now-President Donald Trump by using the Obama administration’s Russia-gate intelligence “assessment,” electronic surveillance of dubious legality, and a salacious dossier that could never pass the smell test, while at the same time using equally dubious techniques to immunize Hillary Clinton and her closest advisers from crimes that include lying to the FBI and endangering secrets.

Ironically, the Strzok-Page texts provide something that the Russia-gate investigation has been sorely lacking: first-hand evidence of both corrupt intent and action. After months of breathless searching for “evidence” of Russian-Trump collusion designed to put Trump in the White House, what now exists is actual evidence that senior officials of the Obama administration colluded to keep Trump out of the White House – proof of what old-time gumshoes used to call “means, motive and opportunity.”

Even more unfortunately for Russia-gate enthusiasts, the FBI lovers’ correspondence provides factual evidence exposing much of the made-up “Resistance” narrative – the contrived storyline that The New York Times and much of the rest of the U.S. mainstream media deemed fit to print with little skepticism and few if any caveats, a scenario about brilliantly devious Russians that not only lacks actual evidence – relying on unverified hearsay and rumor – but doesn’t make sense on its face.

The Russia-gate narrative always hinged on the preposterous notion that Russian President Vladimir

Putin foresaw years ago what no American political analyst considered even possible, the political ascendancy of Donald Trump. According to the narrative, the fortune-telling Putin then risked creating even worse tensions with a nuclear-armed America that would – by all odds – have been led by a vengeful President Hillary Clinton.

Besides this wildly improbable storyline, there were flat denials from WikiLeaks, which distributed the supposedly “hacked” Democratic emails, that the information came from Russia – and there was the curious inability of the National Security Agency to use its immense powers to supply any technical evidence to support the Russia-hack scenario.

The Trump Shock

But the shock of Trump’s election and the decision of many never-Trumpers to cast their lot with the Resistance led to a situation in which any prudent skepticism or demand for evidence was swept aside.

So, on Jan. 6, 2017, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released an evidence-free report that he said was compiled by “hand-picked” analysts from the CIA, FBI and NSA, offering an “assessment” that Russia and President Putin were behind the release of the Democratic emails in a plot to help Trump win the presidency.

Despite the extraordinary gravity of the charge, even New York Times correspondent Scott Shane noted that proof was lacking. He wrote at the time: “What is missing from the [the Jan. 6] public report is what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack. … Instead, the message from the agencies essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”

But the “assessment” served a useful purpose for the never-Trumpers: it applied an official imprimatur on the case for delegitimizing Trump’s election and even raised the long-shot hope that the Electoral College might reverse the outcome and possibly install a compromise candidate, such as former Secretary of State Colin Powell, in the White House. Though the Powell ploy fizzled, the hope of somehow removing Trump from office continued to bubble, fueled by the growing hysteria around Russia-gate.

Virtually all skepticism about the evidence-free “assessment” was banned. For months, the Times and other newspapers of record repeated the lie that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had concurred in the conclusion about the Russian “hack.” Even when that falsehood was belatedly acknowledged, the major news outlets just shifted the phrasing slightly to say that U.S. intelligence agencies had reached the Russian “hack” conclusion. Shane’s blunt initial recognition about the lack of proof disappeared from the mainstream media’s approved narrative of Russia-gate.

Doubts about the Russian “hack” or dissident suggestions that what we were witnessing was a “soft coup” were scoffed at by leading media commentators. Other warnings from veteran U.S. intelligence professionals about the weaknesses of the Russia-gate narrative and the danger of letting politicized intelligence overturn a constitutional election were also brushed aside in pursuit of the goal of removing Trump from the White House.

It didn’t even seem to matter when new Russia-gate disclosures conflicted with the original narrative that Putin had somehow set Trump up as a Manchurian candidate. All normal journalistic skepticism was jettisoned. It was as if the Russia-gate advocates started with the conclusion that Trump must go and then made the facts fit into that mold, but anyone who noted the violations of normal investigative procedures was dismissed as a “Trump enabler” or a “Moscow stooge.”

The Text Evidence

But then came the FBI text messages, providing documentary evivdence that key FBI officials involved in the Russia-gate investigation were indeed deeply biased and out to get Trump, adding hard proof to Trump’s longstanding lament that he was the subject of a “witch hunt.”

Justified or not, Trump’s feeling of vindication could hardly be more dangerous — particularly at a time when the most urgent need is to drain some testosterone from the self-styled Stable-Genius-in-Chief and his martinet generals.

On the home front, Trump, his wealthy friends, and like-thinkers in Congress may now feel they have an even wider carte blanche to visit untold misery on the poor, the widow, the stranger and other vulnerable humans. That was always an underlying danger of the Resistance’s strategy to seize on whatever weapons were available – no matter how reckless or unfair – to “get Trump.”

Beyond that, Russia-gate has become so central to the Washington establishment’s storyline that there appears to be no room for second-thoughts or turning back. The momentum is such that some Democrats and the media never-Trumpers can’t stop stoking the smoke of Russia-gate and holding out hope against hope that it will somehow justify Trump’s impeachment.

Yet, the sordid process of using legal/investigative means to settle political scores further compromises the principle of the “rule of law” and integrity of journalism in the eyes of many Americans. After a year of Russia-gate, the “rule of law” and “pursuit of truth” appear to have been reduced to high-falutin’ phrases for political score-setttling, a process besmirched by Republicans in earlier pursuits of Democrats and now appearing to be a bipartisan method for punishing political rivals regardless of the lack of evidence.

Strzok and Page

Peter Strzok (pronounced “struck”) has an interesting pedigree with multiple tasks regarding both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump. As the FBI’s chief of counterespionage during the investigation into then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a personal email server for classified information, Strzok reportedly changed the words “grossly negligent” (which could have triggered legal prosecution) to the far less serious “extremely careless” in FBI Director James Comey’s depiction of Clinton’s actions. This semantic shift cleared the way for Comey to conclude just 20 days before the Democratic National Convention began in July 2016, that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring charges against Mrs. Clinton.

Then, as Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, Strzok led the FBI’s investigation into alleged Russian interference in the U.S. election of 2016. It is a safe bet that he took a strong hand in hand-picking the FBI contingent of analysts that joined “hand-picked” counterparts from CIA and NSA in preparing the evidence-free, Jan. 6, 2017 assessment accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of interfering in the election of 2016. (Although accepted in Establishment groupthink as revealed truth, that poor excuse for analysis reflected the apogee of intelligence politicization — rivaled only by the fraudulent intelligence on “weapons of mass destruction“ in Iraq 15 years ago.)

In June and July 2017 Strzok was the top FBI official working on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russia, but was taken off that job when the Justice Department IG learned of the Strzok-Page text-message exchange and told Mueller.

There is no little irony in the fact that what did in the FBI sweathearts was their visceral disdain for Mr. Trump, their cheerleading-cum-kid-gloves treatment of Mrs. Clinton and her associates, their 1950-ish, James Clapperesque attitude toward Russians as “almost genetically driven” to evil, and their (Strzok/Page) elitist conviction that they know far better what is good for the country than regular American citizens, including those “deplorables” whom Clinton said made up half of Trump’s supporters.

But Strzok/Page had no idea that their hubris, elitism and scheming would be revealed in so tangible a way. Worst of all for them, the very thing that Strzok, in particular, worked so hard to achieve — the sabotaging of Trump and immunization of Mrs. Clinton and her closest advisers is now coming apart at the seams.

Congress: Oversee? or Overlook?

At this point, the $64 question is whether the various congressional oversight committees will remain ensconced in their customarily cozy role as “overlook” committees, or whether they will have the courage to attempt to carry out their Constitutional duty. The latter course would mean confronting a powerful Deep State and its large toolbox of well-practiced retaliatory techniques, including J. Edgar Hoover-style blackmail on steroids, enabled by electronic surveillance of just about everything and everyone. Yes, today’s technology permits blanket collection, and “Collect Everything” has become the motto.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, with almost four decades of membership in the House and Senate, openly warned incoming President Trump in January 2017 against criticizing the U.S. intelligence community because U.S. intelligence officials have “six ways from Sunday to get back at you” if you are “dumb” enough to take them on.

Thanks to the almost 10,000 text messages between Strzok and Page, only a small fraction of which were given to Congress four weeks ago, there is now real evidentiary meat on the bones of the suspicions that there indeed was a “deep-state coup” to “correct” the outcome of the 2016 election. We now know that the supposedly apolitical FBI officials had huge political axes to grind. The Strzok-Page exchanges drip with disdain for Trump and those deemed his smelly deplorable supporters. In one text message, Strzok expressed visceral contempt for those working-class Trump voters, writing on Aug. 26, 2016, “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support. … it’s scary real down here.”

The texts even show Strzok warning of the need for an “insurance policy” to thwart Trump on the off-chance that his poll numbers closed in on those of Mrs. Clinton.

An Aug. 6, 2016 text message, for example, shows Page giving her knight in shining armor strong affirmation: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace [Trump].” That text to Strzok includes a link to a David Brooks column in The New York Times, in which Brooks concludes with the clarion call: “There comes a time when neutrality and laying low become dishonorable. If you’re not in revolt, you’re in cahoots. When this period and your name are mentioned, decades hence, your grandkids will look away in shame.”

Another text message shows that other senior government officials – alarmed at the possibility of a Trump presidency – joined the discussion. In an apparent reference to an August 2016 meeting with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Strzok wrote to Page on Aug. 15, 2016, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.”  Strzok added, “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event that you die before you’re 40.”

Insurance Policy?

Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, says he will ask Strzok to explain the “insurance policy” when he calls him to testify. What seems already clear is that the celebrated “Steele Dossier” was part of the “insurance,” as was the evidence-less legend that Russia hacked the DNC’s and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails and gave them to WikiLeaks.

If congressional investigators have been paying attention, they already know what former weapons inspector Scott Ritter shared with Veteran intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) colleagues this week; namely, that Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson, who commissioned the Russia dossier using Democratic Party money, said he reached out to Steele after June 17, just three days before Steele’s first report was published, drawing on seven sources.

“There is a snowball’s chance in hell that this is raw intelligence gathered by Steele; rather he seems to have drawn on a single ‘trusted intermediary’ to gather unsubstantiated rumor already in existence.”

Another VIPS colleague, Phil Giraldi, writing out of his own experience in private sector consulting, added: “The fact that you do not control your sources frequently means that they will feed you what they think you want to hear. Since they are only doing it for money, the more lurid the details the better, as it increases the apparent value of the information. The private security firm in turn, which is also doing it for the money, will pass on the stories and even embroider them to keep the client happy and to encourage him to come back for more. When I read the Steele dossier it looked awfully familiar to me, like the scores of similar reports I had seen which combined bullshit with enough credible information to make the whole product look respectable.”

It is now widely known that the Democrats ponied up the “insurance premiums,” so to speak, for former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele’s “dossier” of lurid — but largely unproven — “intelligence” on Trump and the Russians. If, as many have concluded, the   dossier was used to help justify a FISA warrant to snoop on the Trump campaign, those involved will be in deep kimchi, if congressional overseers do their job.

How, you might ask, could Strzok and associates undertake these extra-legal steps with such blithe disregard for the possible consequences should they be caught? The answer is easy; Mrs. Clinton was a shoo-in, remember? This was just extra insurance with no expectation of any “death benefit” ever coming into play — save for Trump’s electoral demise in November 2016. The attitude seemed to be that, if abuse of the FISA law should eventually be discovered — there would be little interest in a serious investigation by the editors of The New York Times and other anti-Trump publications and whatever troubles remained could be handled by President Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, who chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee of Judiciary on Crime and Terrorism, joined Sen. Grassley in signing the letter referring Christopher Steele to the Justice Department to investigate what appear to be false statements about the dossier. In signing, Graham noted the “many stop signs the Department of Justice ignored in its use of the dossier.” The signature of committee ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, however, was missing — an early sign that a highly partisan battle royale is in the offing.  On Tuesday, Feinstein unilaterally released a voluminous transcript of Glenn Simpson’s earlier testimony and, as though on cue, Establishment pundits portrayed Steele as a good source and Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson as a victim.

The Donnybrook is now underway; the outcome uncertain.

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington.  He was an Army and CIA intelligence analyst for 30 years; prepared and briefed the President’s Daily Brief for Nixon, Ford, and Reagan; and is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

+++++++++++++

Sample text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, released to Congress and the media on December 13, 2016

++++++++++++++

03/04/2016

Strzok – God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0.

Page – I know

++++++++++++

04/02/2016

Page – So look, you say we text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced, you were just venting, bc you feel bad that you’re gone so much but that can’t be helped right now.

++++++++++

07/08/2016

Strzok – And meanwhile, we have Black Lives Matter protestors, right now, chanting “no justice no peace” around DoJ and the White House…

Page – That’s awful.

+++++++++

07/14/2016

Page – Have you read this? It’s really frightening. For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance http://NYTI/ms/29WCu5!

Strzok – I have not. But I think it’s clear he’s capturing all the white, poor voters who the mainstream republicans abandoned in all but name in the quest for the almighty $$$

Page – Yeah, it’s not good.

Strzok – Poll Finds Emails Weighing on Hillary Clinton, Now Tied With Donald Trump http://nyti.ms/29RV5gf

Page – It is

+++++++++++++

07/26/2016

Strzok – And hey. Congrats on a woman nominated for President in a major party! About damn time! Many many more returns of the day!!

Page – That’s cute. Thanks

++++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – Jesus. You should read this. And Trump should go f himself. Moment in Convention Glare Shakes Up Khans American Life http://nyti.ms/2aHulE0

Strzok – God that’s a great article. Thanks for sharing. And F TRUMP.

++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – And maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace. To that end comma, read this:

Page – Trump Enablers Will Finally Have to Take A Stand http://nyti.ms/2aFakry

Strzok – Thanks. It’s absolutely true that we’re both very fortunate. And of course I’ll try and approach it that way. I just know it will be tough at times. I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps

++++++++++++

08/09/2016

Page – He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!

Strzok – OMG did you hear what Trump just said?

+++++++++++

08/26/2016

Strzok – Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support…

Page – Yep. Out to lunch with (redacted) We both hate everyone and everything.

Page – Just riffing on the hot mess that is our country.

Strzok – Yeah…it’s scary real down here

+++++++++

10/20/2016

Strzok: I am riled up. Trump is a f***ing idiot, is unable to provide a coherent answer.

Strzok – I CAN’T PULL AWAY, WHAT THE F**K HAPPENED TO OUR COUNTRY (redacted)??!?!

Page– I don’t know. But we’ll get it back. We’re America. We rock.

Strzok– Donald just said “bad hombres”

Strzok– Trump just said what the FBI did is disgraceful.

This article was originally published by Consortium News –

====

Was the DNC/Clinton campaign-funded dossier used to obtain warrants on Trump team from the secret court?

=============================

* Zie: ‘Wall Street Journal wil punt achter Russiagate

Zie ook: ‘WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

        en: ‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

        en: ‘Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

        en ‘Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax

       en: ‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

       en: ‘Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen

       en: ‘Google, de volgende ‘die advertentieruimte verkocht aan Putin zelf……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!‘ (ja ook deze D66 plork gaat plat op de bek!)

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en: ‘Rusland heeft niets van doen met manipulaties van de VS presidentsverkiezingen via Facebook, wel maakt Facebook meer kapot dan je lief is…….

       en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en:  ‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

       en: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

       en: ‘Pompeo (CIA opperhoofd met koperen fluit): heeft alle aanwijzingen dat Rusland de midterm verkiezingen zal manipuleren……

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..


       en: De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

       en: ‘‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

Oprah Winfrey als president, is de VS compleet gek geworden?

Op
de Intercept publiceerde Mehdi Hasan afgelopen maandag een artikel
waarin hij zich al in de kop afvraagt of we helemaal gek zijn geworden,
door nu Oprah Winfrey, u weet wel o.a. notoire belastingontduiker en
presentator van een praatprogramma, als toekomstig president van te VS te zien……

Hasan
vergelijkt een aantal presidenten en stelt dan dat Winfrey, die o.a.
wel stabiel is i.t.t. Trump, een grote verademing zou zijn op Trump
al leg je daarmee de lat wel erg laag…… Bovendien is ze geen
seksist, of een fascist en wordt ze niet verdacht van het heulen met
‘de vijand’, zoals in het geval van Trump en Rusland…… Dat
laatste had Hasan niet moeten zeggen, hij zou moeten weten dat dit
gelul is van de democraten in samenwerking met een paar geheime diensten……. Het was zeker na de val van de Sovjet-Unie
bijna gebruikelijk voor de komende administratie, als met Israël ook
te overleggen met Rusland; dit had Hasan kunnen weten.

Voorts
stelt Hasan dat we (in de VS. Ap) niet nog een president nodig hebben
die een niet gekozen generaal en Goldman Sachs een deel van het werk
laat doen…….. Hasan moet toch weten dat Trump bepaald niet de
eerste president is, die ofwel het leger min of meer liet beslissen
wat te doen (waarna het werd gebracht als was het een plan van de
president) en de banken de vrije hand gaf….

Maakt
verder niet uit Hasan schreef een uiterst informatief stuk, waarin
hij filosofeert en uiteindelijk stelt dat de VS echt geen tweede
nitwit als Trump nodig heeft, een tweede steenrijke figuur, die deels
het eigenbelang zal laten prevaleren……..

Lees
en oordeel zelf:

Oprah
Winfrey for President: Have We All Gone Bonkers?

BEVERLY HILLS, CA - JANUARY 07:  In this handout photo provided by NBCUniversal, Oprah Winfrey accepts the 2018 Cecil B. DeMille Award   speaks onstage during the 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards at The Beverly Hilton Hotel on January 7, 2018 in Beverly Hills, California.  (Photo by Paul Drinkwater/NBCUniversal via Getty Images)

Photo:
Paul Drinkwater/NBCUniversal/Getty Images

Mehdi
Hasan
contact: Twitter @mehdirhasan

January
8, 2018

HAVE
WE ALL
 gone
bonkers?

On
Sunday evening, 
#Oprah2020 began
trending on social media after Oprah Winfrey delivered a 
rousing
speech
 against
misogyny and racism at the Golden Globe Awards. While Oprah has in
the past 
ruled
out
 running
for public office, her longtime partner Stedman Graham just told the
Los Angeles Times that 
“she
would absolutely do it,”
 and
CNN is reporting that Oprah is 
“actively
thinking”
 about
running for president.


Is #Oprah2020 really
a serious thing?

Do
people honestly consider the talk-show-host-turned-media-mogul to be
a viable or appropriate candidate to run against fellow celebrity
billionaire Donald Trump in three years? “I have no idea if Oprah
would be a good candidate or president,” former Obama speechwriter
Jon Favreau 
wrote
on Twitter
,
“but dismissing her out of hand because Trump is a celebrity seems
short-sighted.”

Really?
I’m old enough to remember when liberals gave a damn about
experience, qualifications, and judgement; when Democrats mocked the
idea of Trump — a former reality TV star and property developer
who 
struggled
to tell the difference between Hamas and Hezbollah
 —
running for the presidency.

On
the campaign trail, former President Barack Obama blasted Trump as
uniquely
unqualified
,”
lacking in “
basic
knowledge

and “
woefully
unprepared

to do the job of commander-in-chief. In stark contrast, 
he
argued
,
there had “never been a man or a woman more qualified than Hillary
Clinton to serve as president of the United States of America.”

WASHINGTON, DC - NOVEMBER 20:  U.S. President Barack Obama awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Oprah Winfrey in the East Room at the White House on November 20, 2013 in Washington, DC. The Presidential Medal of Freedom is the nation's highest civilian honor, presented to individuals who have made meritorious contributions to the security or national interests of the United States, to world peace, or to cultural or other significant public or private endeavors. Also pictured is Mario Molina (L). (Photo by Win McNamee/Getty Images)

President
Barack Obama awards the Presidential Medal of Freedom to Oprah
Winfrey in the East Room at the White House on Nov. 20, 2013 in
Washington.Photo:
Win McNamee/Getty Images

Clinton
called Trump “
totally
unqualified
,”
while an op-ed from the New York Times editorial board, headlined
Why
Donald Trump Should Not Be President
,”
pointed out that the GOP candidate “has no experience in national
security.” Three days after the election, Vox ran a
piece 
headlined,
“Donald Trump is the only U.S. president ever with no political or
military experience.”

Well,
dear liberals and Democrats, guess what? President Winfrey would be
the second such president. Is this really what most Americans want or
what the United States government needs? Another clueless celebrity
in possession of the nuclear codes? Another billionaire mogul
who 
doesn’t
like paying taxes
 in
charge of the economy? And how would it be anything other than sheer
hypocrisy for Democrats to offer an unqualified, inexperienced
presidential candidate to the American electorate in 2020, given all
that they said about Trump in 2016?

Granted,
Oprah isn’t a 
raging
narcissist
 or
racist
bigot
;
she doesn’t have ties to white nationalists, isn’t accused of
colluding with a foreign government, and hasn’t been caught on tape
admitting to sexual assault.

Oprah
would be a far superior, smarter, and more stable president than
Trump in every imaginable way. But that, of course, is a
low, 
low bar.

As
CNBC’s Christina Wilkie, in a rare dissent on Twitter, 
put
it
:
“I love to watch Oprah saying inspirational things on television.
But also I love to watch people who have political experience being
elected to national office.”

What
about former Hollywood actor Ronald Reagan, some Oprah supporters
might say? The Gipper, however, was also a former two-term governor
from California. Obama, also accused of being a political lightweight
when he ran for president, was a sitting senator, former
constitutional law professor, and author of two acclaimed books on
politics and policy. Even the know-nothing George W. Bush had won two
gubernatorial elections in Texas before throwing his hat in the
presidential ring in 2000.

Prior
to Trump, the only presidents to 
never
have served in public office
 prior
to being elected to the White House were Zachary Taylor, Ulysses S.
Grant, and Dwight Eisenhower. The first won the Mexican-American War;
the second, the Civil War; and the third, the Second World War.

Does
Oprah have anything on her resume to compare with that? Is 
emoting
on TV
 and handing
out free cars
 —
even if it is, admittedly, part of building an impressive
multi-billion-dollar media empire from scratch — really an
acceptable substitute for political or military experience? Is that
how debased the political culture has become?

MEYERTON, HENLEY ON KLIP - JANUARY 14:  Oprah Winfrey poses with the Graduates at the inaugural graduation of the class of 2011 at Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls on January 14, 2012 in Henley on Klip, South Africa.  (Photo by Michelly Rall/Getty Images)

Oprah
Winfrey poses at the inaugural graduation of the class of 2011 at
Oprah Winfrey Leadership Academy for Girls on Jan. 14, 2012 in Henley
on Klip, South Africa.

 Photo:
Michelly Rall/Getty Images

DO
I SOUND
 elitist?
Perhaps. But what’s wrong with wanting people with intellect,
experience, and qualifications to fill the most important jobs? As
Oprah’s fellow celebrity liberal Jon Stewart 
once
said
:
“Not only do I want an elite president, I want someone who’s
embarrassingly superior to me, somebody who speaks 16 languages and
sleeps two hours a night hanging upside down in a chamber they
themselves designed.”

Well,
the Oprah fans might argue, she could surround herself with big
brains. But isn’t that the argument that Trump supporters make,
too? Do we really want another president deferring to 
unelected
generals
 and Goldman
Sachs
?
And do we think a talk-show host who promoted the careers of
hucksters 
Dr.
Phil and Dr. Oz
,
while also 
giving
a platform
 to
the anti-science lunacy of actresses Jenny McCarthy and Suzanne
Somers, is capable of constructing a Lincoln-esque 
“Team
of Rivals”
?
A political and economic “Justice League?” Come. Off. It.

To
be clear: I am not saying that Oprah can’t, or won’t, be
president. Predictions are for fools, and Trump has proved that
anything is possible.

Oprah’s
supporters — rightly — might point to her strong record on
standing up to racism and misogyny, not to mention her inspirational
oratory and backstory. Her 
record
on Iraq
 is
better than Clinton’s; she once even 
hosted
a show on universal health care
 with
Michael Moore. It might also seem like an act of divine justice if
Trump, hero to white nationalists and neo-Nazis, was replaced by a
strong black woman.

Oprah’s
critics — also rightly — might point to her 
fronting
for global corporations
 and
her role as “
one
of the world’s best neoliberal capitalist thinkers
.”
They might ask: What is Oprah’s position on drone strikes in
Pakistan? On supporting the Saudi war in Yemen? On cap and trade?
Single-payer? Tax reform? Does she have a plan for Middle East peace?
Could a person who once seemed surprised that Indian people still
eat
with their hands

really defuse a nuclear crisis on the Indian subcontinent?

But
we have to go beyond the pros and cons of an Oprah presidency — I
can’t believe I just typed that line — and consider some broader
questions: How much damage is U.S. celebrity culture doing to U.S.
politics? Why don’t ideologies, or even ideas, seem to matter
anymore? Shouldn’t progressives be making the case for the virtues
of government and collective action and, therefore, the importance of
electing people of ability, experience, and expertise to high office?
Shouldn’t they be arguing that billionaire TV stars have no
business running for the most powerful job on planet Earth,
regardless of whether they are an orange man called Trump or a black
woman called Oprah?

Some
pundits have suggested that the Democrats can’t win without a
celebrity candidate like Oprah in 2020. “If you need to set a thief
to catch a thief,” neoconservative John Podhoretz wrote in a 
New
York Post op-ed
 in
September 2017 that was 
retweeted by
Oprah herself, “you need a star — a grand, outsized, fearless
star whom Trump can neither intimidate nor outshine — to catch a
star.”

This
simply isn’t true. In August 2017, 
Public
Policy Polling
found
Trump trailed Joe Biden (by 15 points), Bernie Sanders (14 points),
Elizabeth Warren (7 points), Cory Booker (5 points), and Kamala
Harris (1 point) in potential 2020 match-ups. Last month, an 
NBC/Wall
Street Journal poll 
found
Trump would lose to a “Generic Democrat” in 2020 by a whopping 16
points.

If
five different senators plus a Generic Democrat can beat this
Republican president, then why the liberal excitement over a
talk-show host? And why draw the line at Oprah? What about 
Mark
Zuckerberg
Mark
Cuban
Dwayne
“The Rock” Johnson
Kanye?
Where, oh where, does it end?

The
liberal response to the rise of Trump cannot and should not be “let’s
find our own bigger, better version of The Donald.” As columnist
Emily Arrowood 
wrote in
May 2016: “That Trump is acutely unqualified would be true even if
he were Mr. Congeniality, a champion of the people with the
aspirations of Jimmy Stewart in ‘Mr. Smith Goes to Washington.’”

The
irony is that Oprah may, in fact, 
be Ms.
Congeniality. But she is still as “acutely unqualified” as Trump.
Let’s get a grip, folks.

Top
photo: In this handout photo provided by NBCUniversal, Oprah Winfrey
speaks onstage during the 75th Annual Golden Globe Awards at the
Beverly Hilton Hotel on Jan. 7, 2018 in Beverly Hills, Calif.

Oekraïne, wat de reguliere (massa-) media, ‘deskundigen’ en politici u niet vertellen over dit door een junta geregeerd land

Mint
Press News publiceerde gisteren een lang artikel van Darius
Shahtahmasebi over Oekraïne en wat de massamedia (zogenaamd onafhankelijk) u niet vertellen.
Dezelfde media die keer op keer volhouden dat Rusland de VS
presidentsverkiezingen, het Brexit-referendum, het
onafhankelijkheidsreferendum van Catalonië enz. hebben
gemanipuleerd, zonder daar ook maar één steekhoudend bewijs voor te
leveren.

Voor die
zogenaamde Russische bemoeienis wordt ook het beest Trump als
mededader genoemd, terwijl we telkens weer zien, dat Trump
allesbehalve een pro-Russische beleid voert, iets dat Shahtahmasebi
in het volgende artikel uit en te na bewijst.

In het
artikel o.a. De volgende feiten:

  • De
    door de VS georganiseerde opstand in Oekraïne, die tot de
    succesvolle staatsgreep tegen de democratisch gekozen president
    Janoekovytsj moest leiden en leidde, waarna de VS een door haar
    gewilde junta installeerde (met bewijzen van gesprekken daarover
    tussen Nuland (staatssecretaris BuZa onder Obama) en Pyatt, destijds
    ambassadeur voor de VS in Oekraïne ….. Overigens was de VS al
    vanaf 2011 bezig met de voorbereidingen tot die opstand, onder
    eindverantwoording van Hillary Clinton (en Obama), de toenmalige minister van
    Buitenlandse Zaken. Deze coup en de voorbereidingen heeft de VS meer
    dan 4 miljard dollar gekost…… Intussen is duidelijk geworden dat
    Porosjenko ongelofelijk corrupt is en er intussen nog geen 15% van
    de bevolking achter deze juntaleider staat………

  • De
    VS levert zware wapens aan Oekraïne, waarmee de VS de
    ‘burgeroorlog’ in Oekraïne verder aanwakkert en Rusland voor het
    blok zet…. Immers de burgers in Oost-Oekraïne, die niet wensen te
    leven onder de neonazi-dictatuur van Porosjenko, worden al een paar
    jaar gebombardeerd door de neonazi-bataljons van Porosjenko. Rusland
    zou vechten in Oekraïne, een belachelijke weergave van de
    werkelijkheid >> wanneer dit een feit zou zijn, waren deze
    neonazi-bataljons al lang het gebied uit gewerkt. Met deze nieuwe VS
    wapens wordt het steeds moeilijker voor Rusland niet de burgers in
    Oost-Oekraïne te hulp te schieten met militaire hulp……..

  • Het
    door de VS ondersteunen van neonazi’s in Oekraïne. Voordat
    Porosjenko door de VS werd geparachuteerd als ‘president’ van
    Oekraïne, werkte hij al voor BuZa in Washington, hij werd in de VS
    zelfs ‘onze mol’ in Oekraïne genoemd….. Dit alles terwijl de VS
    zogenaamd opkomt voor democratie, waar dit ‘land’ bij herhaling
    democratisch gekozen regeringen aan de kant laat zetten en het
    liefst laat vervangen door fascisten…. Naast Oekraïne: Chili in 1973
    en Honduras in 2009, verder een reeks Midden- en Zuid-Amerikaanse
    landen voor en na 1973, waar de VS uiteraard dikke steun
    verleende aan deze fascistische mensenrechten schendende junta’s……. Voorts nog de staatsgrepen tegen: Syrië (een mislukte poging),
    Brazilië (de staatsgreep tegen president Dilma Rousseff), Libië en
    Iran (waar de staatsgrepen tegen de Braziliaanse president Rousseff
    en president Assad van Syrië, alweer gericht waren tegen democratisch
    gekozen regeringen…….). Om te besluiten met Venezuela waartegen de VS al een aantal jaren een economische oorlog voert en gewelddadige groepen steunt, dit met de opzet president Maduro af te zetten…..

  • De
    uitbreiding van de NAVO, tegen de afspraken in, die in 1991 met
    Gorbatsjov werden gemaakt….. Het niet uitbreiden van de NAVO was zelfs de eis van Gorbatsjov, voor het akkoord gaan met de hereniging van Oost- en
    West-Duitsland……..

Mensen lezenm dit met feiten onderbouwde artikel van
Shahtahmasebi en geeft het door!

What
Trump Is Doing in Ukraine Proves the Mainstream Media Doesn’t Know
Sh*t

January
9, 2018 at 9:38 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

The
Russia-obsessed corporate media continues to peddle the narrative
that Donald Trump has turned the United States into a client-state of
Russia, even while he directly provokes the former Soviet Union by
providing Russia’s foe — Urkaine — with the largest lethal
assistance to a country on its border.

(MPN) — Despite
the mainstream media’s 
insistence that
U.S. President Donald Trump is some sort of compromised Russian
lackey, the fact is that at the end of last year, his
 administration
approved
 the
largest U.S. commercial sale of lethal defensive weapons to Ukraine
since 2014. This is a move that clearly
 infuriates
and angers
 Russia,
souring relations between the two countries even more so than
they
 already
had been
 under
the Obama administration (and in
 various
stages
 throughout
Trump’s first year in office).

According to The
Washington Post
,
administration officials confirmed that in December the State
Department had approved a commercial license authorizing the export
of Model M107A1 Sniper Systems, ammunition, and other associated
parts and accessories to Ukraine — a package valued at $41.5
million.

At
first, it was reported there had not yet been approval to export the
heavier weaponry the Ukrainian government had been asking for, such
as anti-tank missiles. However, by the end of

December, reports began
surfacing that the Trump administration was in fact going to
provide 35 FGM-148 Javelin launchers and 210 anti-tank missiles.
The Javelin is allegedly one of the most advanced anti-tank systems
on the market. The total package is now valued at $47 million, and it
wouldn’t be surprising if this figure continues to rise in the
weeks to come.

Even
under the 
2014
Ukraine Freedom Support Act
,
the Obama administration never authorized large commercial or
government arms sales, thereby making the recent announcement the
first time that the U.S. will provide “lethal” weapons to the
Ukraine military.

One
senior congressional official said that he predicted this would be
just the beginning, stating that the U.S. had “
crossed
the Rubicon; this is lethal weapons and I predict more will be
coming,”
 according
to the 
PostForeign
Policy’s
 Michael
Carpenter 
suggested that
NATO countries should follow suit and also provide Ukraine with the
arms it needs to counter the so-called threat of Russia. Considering
that in September 2017 Russia proposed that UN peacekeepers
be 
deployed to
Ukraine, it should be clear that the U.S. is more bent on escalating
this conflict than on resolving it.

Russia
has already 
responded in
kind, with Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov stating that the
U.S. has become an accomplice in the war and that these developments
make it impossible for Russia to remain “indifferent,” thereby
forcing Russia to consider retaliation measures in response.

The
U.S. is the
 world’s
largest arms dealer
.
The U.S. arms so many countries so much of the time that most of us
barely blink. And yet, even taking at face value America’s stated
goals of spreading democracy and promoting human rights, the facts on
the ground appear to run contrary to those ideals and the U.S. is
well aware of these contradictions.

In
reality, the United States intervened covertly in Ukraine in 2014
because Russia and Europe were 
growing
far too close to each other for America’s comfort
,
with Russia supplying at least 30 percent of Europe’s gas supply.
This was an issue particularly in relation to 
Germany’s
growing fondness for Russian gas
,
as Germany is set to 
become
the EU’s major player
.

This
is a deal-breaker for Washington, which would rather support 
known
neo-Nazis
 and
anti-Semites in order to install a right-wing government capable of
opposing Russia as close to the Russian border as one can get.

U.S.
Installed a Puppet Government in Ukraine

John
McCain, center, speaks as Connecticut senator Chris Murphy, second
left, and Opposition leader Oleh Tyahnybok, right, stand around him
during a rally in Kiev, Ukraine, Dec. 15, 2013. (AP/Dmitry Lovetsky)

On
February 7, 2014, the BBC published a
 transcript of
a bugged phone conversation between Assistant Secretary of State
Victoria Nuland and the U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine, Geoffrey Pyatt.
In this phone call, the U.S. officials were openly discussing who
should form Ukraine’s government even before the president, Viktor
Yanukovych, had been successfully 
ousted
from power
.
In other words, the U.S. was actively doing to Russia’s neighbour
what the corporate media and various elements of the intelligence
communities have accused Russia of doing to the U.S. during the 2016
elections. As 
The
Nation
 explained:

In
the intercepted phone call between U.S. Assistant Secretary of State
for European Affairs Victoria Nuland and U.S. Ambassador to Ukraine
Geoffrey Pyatt, the two were, as Russian expert 
Stephen
Cohen
 put
it to Democracy Now, 
plotting
a coup d’état against the elected president of
Ukraine.’” 
[emphasis
added]

Good.
I don’t think Klitsch [opposition leader Vitaly Klitschko] should
go into the government. I don’t think it’s necessary, I don’t
think it’s a good idea,”  Nuland said in the call, as
transcribed by the BBC.

Pyatt
responded:

Yeah.
I guess… in terms of him not going into the government, just let
him stay out and do his political homework and stuff. I’m just
thinking in terms of sort of the process moving ahead we want to keep
the moderate democrats together. The problem is going to be Tyahnybok
[Oleh Tyahnybok, an opposition leader] and his guys and I’m sure
that’s part of what [President Viktor] Yanukovych is calculating on
all this.”

Nuland
added:

I
think Yats [opposition leader Arseniy Yatseniuk] is the guy who’s
got the economic experience, the governing experience. He’s the…
what he needs is Klitsch and Tyahnybok on the outside. He needs to be
talking to them four times a week, you know. I just think Klitsch
going in… he’s going to be at that level working for Yatseniuk,
it’s just not going to work.”

Oleh
Tyahnybok, who had met with Senator John McCain
 one
year prior
,
is the leader of the right-wing nationalist party Svoboda. When
Svoboda was founded in 1995, the party
 had a
swastika-like logo. As 
Business
Insider
 explains,
Tyahnybok is also a known anti-Semite:

Tyahnybok
himself was expelled from the Our Ukraine parliamentary faction in
2004 after giving a speech 
demanding
that Ukrainians fight against a
 ‘Muscovite-Jewish
mafia’ (he later clarified 
this
by saying that he actually had Jewish friends
 and
was only against to ‘a group of Jewish oligarchs who control
Ukraine and against Jewish-Bolsheviks [in the past]’). In 2005 he
wrote open letters demanding Ukraine do more to halt ‘criminal
activities’ of ‘organized Jewry,’ and, even now, Svoboda openly
calls for Ukrainian citizens to have their ethnicity printed onto
their passports.”

When
the protests broke out in Ukraine in 2014, the entire movement was
hijacked by these racist elements.

You’d
never know from most of the reporting that far-right nationalists and
fascists have been at the heart of the protests and attacks on
government buildings,” reported Seumas Milne of 
The
Guardian
. Just
days ago,
 thousands
marched
 in
Kiev to celebrate the anniversary of far-right nationalist Stepan
Bandera’s birthday.

It
is revealing that, when the U.S. decided to make a choice between a
president they viewed as a Russian ally and the various ultra-right
nationalist elements of Ukraine, Washington decided to help oust the
former for the benefit of the latter.

The
State Department Promoting Neo-Nazism in Ukraine


A
photo of the Azov Battalion – a regiment of the National Guard of
Ukraine. (Photo: Twitter)

Eventually,
it was reported that a man named Petro Poroshenko would be taking up
the reins after Yanukovych’s abdication. According to a
cable 
obtained by
WikiLeaks, Poroshenko previously worked as a mole for the U.S. State
Department. The State Department even referred to Poroshenko as “our
Ukrainian insider.”

For
those who truly believe the U.S. protects and promotes democracy
while challenging tyranny and dictatorships across the globe, the
truth about Washington’s support for puppet regimes that fail to
garner the support of their own people is even worse than
any 
anti-imperialist
commentator
 could
ever have imagined. In March last year, 
Foreign
Affairs 
reported
that
 Poroshenko had
an approval rating as low as 
17
percent
.
In September last year, the 
Japan
Times
 reported that
his approval rating had dropped to a 
single
digit
.
Some
 reportssay
it was as low as 
2
percent
.
October last year saw his approval rating grow to its highest in
recent times,
 reaching a
stratospheric 
14
percent
.

In
other words, the Trump administration is actively propping up a
failed administration in Europe, which does not have the support of
15 percent of its people. Even the far-right militias in Ukraine
 seem
to have more support
 than
the current government. Meanwhile, the U.S. has done nothing but its
utmost to tear apart the respective democratically elected
governments in
 Syria and Iran, both
of which
 have
far 
greater
approval ratings
 than
do Poroshenko and his administration.

Russian
Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov
 said Washington’s
recent decision to arm Ukraine will only make the conflict more
deadly and suggested that Russia could be forced to respond. “[The
U.S. is] not a mediator. It’s an accomplice in fueling the war,”
Ryabkov said in a statement. Clearly, Russia has a vested interest in
not seeing another NATO ally on its borders, capable of pointing
American missiles in its face on a daily basis.

As The
National Interest
 learned at
the end of last year from recently
 declassified
material
, the
U.S. did indeed break a promise at the end of the Cold War that NATO
would expand “not one inch eastward.” George Washington
University National Security Archives researchers Svetlana
Savranskaya and Tom Blanton 
wrote
in the 
National
Security Archives
:

The
[recently declassified] documents show that multiple national leaders
were considering and rejecting Central and Eastern European
membership in NATO as of early 1990 and through 1991. That
discussions of NATO in the context of German unification negotiations
in 1990 were not at all narrowly limited to the status of East German
territory, and that subsequent Soviet and Russian complaints about
being misled about NATO expansion, were founded in written
contemporaneous memcons and telcons at the highest levels.”

The
documents appear to confirm Russia’s assertion that Soviet leader
Mikhail Gorbachev accepted the proposal for German reunification
(which Gorbachev could have vetoed) only in reliance upon these
assurances from its American counterparts that NATO would not expand
into Eastern Europe. This history is reminiscent of how Russia was
further duped out of using its veto power on a U.N. Security Council
Resolution in Libya in 2011, after having 
received
assurances
 that
the coalition would not pursue regime change.

I
believe that your thoughts about the role of NATO in the current
situation are the result of misunderstanding,” then-British Prime
Minister John Major 
told Gorbachev,
according to British Ambassador Rodric Braithwaite’s diary entry of
March 5, 1991
:

We
are not talking about strengthening of NATO. We are talking about the
coordination of efforts that is already happening in Europe between
NATO and the West European Union, which, as it is envisioned, would
allow all members of the European Community to contribute to enhance
[our] security.”

The
documents also show that Russia had received these assurances from a
number of other high-level officials. These officials included
then-Secretary of State James Baker; President George H.W. Bush; West
German Foreign Minister Hans-Dietrich Genscher; West German
Chancellor Helmut Kohl; former CIA Director Robert Gates; French
leader Francois Mitterrand; Margaret Thatcher; British Foreign
Minister Douglas Hurd; and NATO Secretary-General Manfred Woerner.

U.S.
Army soldiers representing units participating in the the Anaconda-16
military exercise, attend the opening ceremony, in Warsaw, Poland,
Monday, June 6, 2016. Poland and some NATO members launched their
biggest ever exercise, involving some 31,000 troops in a show of
force to neighboring Russia.

Since
that time, NATO has clearly expanded into Europe to the detriment of
Russia. Since the end of the Cold War, NATO has grown to 
include the
Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland, Bulgaria, Estonia, Latvia,
Lithuania, Romania, Slovakia and Slovenia, Albania and Croatia,
and 
Montenegro.

These
developments are crucial because, when one is honest about America’s
infamous history since World War II, it is clear that NATO 
exists
as an entity
 only
to counter and contain Russian influence. Its sole purpose is to
oppose Russia at every corner and this is no secret even in the
corporate media.

According
to the 
Telegraph
,
NATO was formed in “Washington on 4th April, 1949 after the end of
the Second World War, largely to block Soviet expansion into Europe.”
This can be seen clearly in the complete rejection of the
Soviets’ 
attempt
to join NATO itself
 after
Joseph Stalin’s death.

In
a 2016 
interview
with 
The
New Yorker
,
 Douglas Lute, a former three-star general and then-U.S.
Ambassador to NATO also patently admitted that:

“…NATO
was founded on the premise of preventing an attack by the Soviet
Union in Central Europe, where the U.S. would have to come to the aid
of Europe … For the first forty years, NATO focussed on its
greatest risk—the threat that the Soviet Union posed to Western
European security.”

At
the time the unrest broke out in 2014, then-NATO Secretary General
Anders Fogh Rasmussen’s 
comment that
the proposed IMF-EU package presented to Ukraine would have been “a
major boost for Euro-Atlantic security” suggested that NATO had set
its sights on bringing Ukraine into the military alliance.
 In
July of this year
,
NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg met with Poroshenko in Kiev
to further discuss this prospect, already pledging support to Ukraine
on some level.

Now
Ukraine’s bid to join NATO seems almost irrelevant, as the U.S. is
formally involving itself deeper in the Ukrainian conflict and
providing arms to a regime that has flirted with an approval rating
lower than 10 percent, all the while provoking Russia to take further
measures in response.

What
could possibly go wrong?

Meanwhile,
the Russia-obsessed corporate media 
continues
to peddle the narrative
 that
Donald Trump has turned the United States into a client-state of
Russia, even while he directly provokes the former Soviet Union by
providing lethal assistance to a country on its border. Not only is
Trump maintaining an Obama-era policy, he is aggravating and
converting Obama’s Ukraine policy into a much more dangerous one —
ultimately aimed at provoking an aggressive response from Russia in
the weeks or months to come.

By Darius
Shahtahmasebi
 / Creative
Commons
 / MintPress
News
 / Report
a typo

Trumps uitlating over de atoomknop en de onverschilligheid bij zijn achterban, een dictatuur waardig………

Trump
stelde onlangs dat hij een veel grotere atoomknop heeft dan Kim
Yung-un van Noord-Korea*, waarbij hij ook nog eens toegaf te weten,
dat de raketten van Noord-Korea niet werken en dat de atoombom van
Noord-Korea ofwel niet bestaat, of dat deze nog lang niet op een raket
kan worden gemonteerd (niet klein genoeg), of zelfs dat Noord-Korea niet eens een atoombom heeft……**

Uiteraard
een uiterst infantiele manier van spreken (de mijne is groter en beter dan die
van jou), maar tevens een teken dat hij wat betreft z’n achterban
alles kan zeggen en doen, het maakt ze niet uit zolang het hun Donald
maar is…… Een houding die men vooral aantreft in dictaturen……..

Daniel
Ellsberg, eertijds een legeranalist, die de klok luidde over de
leugens waarmee het volk van de VS werd meegesleept in de Vietnam
oorlog, stelt dat e.e.a. nog veel verder gaat. Met de vraag van Trump
in gedachten: “We hebben kernwapens, waarom gebruiken we ze niet?” (iets
dat hij tot 3 keer toe herhaalde), stelt Ellsberg dat Trump daarmee
een gevaarlijk punt is gepasseerd. Hij gebruikt het atoomwapen als
een pistool dat hij richt op een, in zijn ogen, ‘gevaarlijke
vijand…..’

Ellsberg
is waarschijnlijk vergeten dat Obama als president in 2016 al heeft
gesteld, het atoomwapen niet langer als afschrikkingswapen te zien,
maar als een wapen dat gebruikt kan worden bij een eerste
aanval…….. Ofwel bij één van de illegale oorlog de de VS keer
op keer begint……..

Lees
het uitstekende artikel van Darius Shahtahmasebi hieronder, hij legt
de schuld voor de onverschilligheid bij de achterban van Trump tevens
bij de reguliere media, die deze achterban nooit serieus heeft
genomen (zoals hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, die Trumps achterban
wegzette als een zootje niet nadenkende imbecielen….)….

Lees
en oordeel zelf:

Trump
Is a Madman Threatening Nuclear Annihilation and His Supporters Don’t
Care

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Trump Is a Madman Threatening Nuclear Annihilation and His Supporters Don’t Care

January
5, 2018 at 7:49 am

Written
by 
Darius
Shahtahmasebi

(ANTIMEDIA Op-ed)  Donald
Trump’s speeches, interviews, and warmongering escapades on Twitter
are the markings of a madman. In a recent
 Twitter
tirade,
 the
president openly threatened nuclear war with North Korea, writing the
following:

North
Korean Leader Kim Jong Un just stated that the ‘Nuclear Button is
on his desk at all times.’ Will someone from his depleted and food
starved regime please inform him that I too have a Nuclear Button,
but it is a much bigger & more powerful one than his, and my
Button works!”

The
threat of nuclear war would typically send shivers down the spines of
those of us with the normal amount of empathy required to be a
well-adjusted human. According to whistleblower and former defense
analyst Daniel Ellsberg, Trump’s threats go further than mere empty
gestures. They are tantamount to actually using nukes indirectly.
As he recently
 stated
in an interview
 with Democracy
Now!
:

It’s
not a question of whether the president might use them. He’s using
them the way you use a gun when you point it at somebody in a
confrontation, whether or not you pull the trigger. And both Trump
and Kim are using their weapons in that encounter right now, as many
presidents have done…We use them on the hip.”

Why
would someone want to use the threat of nuclear annihilation that
way? Can they be trusted to operate the most powerful office in the
world?

At
the
 end
of December
,
Donald Trump did an interview with 
New
York Times

reporter Michael Schmidt, and the corporate media immediately
lambasted his comments. Trump’s nonsensical ramblings — on the
face of it — arguably portray someone who is by all accounts
mentally unfit to hold the office of the president. Whether or not
Trump is taking everyone for a ride as the master of manipulation,
the corporate media certainly holds the view that he is simply
cognitively incompetent.

Incoherent,
authoritarian, uninformed: Trump’s New York Times interview is a
scary read,” 
Vox opined.
“Trump’s rambling New York Times interview reveals a mind in
denial,”
 wrote Vanity
Fair
.
“Trump’s New York Times interview is a portrait of a man in
cognitive decline,” 
Esquire assertedCNN highlighted the
“47 most outrageous lines in Donald Trump’s New York Times
interview.” The 
Washington
Post
 lamented a
lesser “11 curious quotes from Trump’s New York Times interview.”

By
all accounts, if you care about verifiable facts and integrity, it
should be evident that the president is lying through his teeth
throughout his interview with Michael Schmidt. When he isn’t lying,
he’s barely making practical sense. Yet this was a man who the
American people saw suited to take up the nuclear codes in the
presidential hot-seat with full knowledge that this was how he
presented himself on a daily basis.

This
is a man who, like a petulant child, 
challenged his
secretary of state to an IQ test after this official
reportedly
 called
the president
 a
“fucking moron” in response to Trump asking three times in a
meeting, “
If
we have nuclear weapons, why don’t we use them
?”

Despite
all of this ridiculous behavior, no matter how many times the media
explains how much Donald Trump behaves like an incoherent buffoon,
their criticisms do absolutely nothing to exact serious change on the
people who matter most: his supporters. In fact, Trump’s ludicrous
behavior is likely intentionally directed at his support base, which
seems to love every narcissistic challenge he presents to the
neoliberal establishment and its media cohorts.

As
Charles J. Sykes
 wrote for
the 
New
York Times
 in
February of last year, Donald Trump “
understands
that attacking the media is the reddest of meat for his base, which
has been conditioned to reject reporting from news sites outside of
the conservative media ecosystem.

This
dynamic, unfortunately, swings both ways. If Trump attacks the media,
his support base will rally behind him. Equally, if the mainstream
media attacks Trump in the manner they have become so accustomed to,
his support base stays largely immune to it. These attacks only
strengthen their diehard support for Trump. Sykes explains further:

For
years, as a conservative radio talk show host, I played a role in
that conditioning by hammering the mainstream media for its bias and
double standards. 
But the price turned out to
be far higher than I imagined. The cumulative effect of the attacks
was to delegitimize those outlets and essentially destroy much of the
right’s immunity to false information
We
thought we were creating a savvier, more skeptical audience. Instead,
we opened the door for President Trump, who found an audience that
could be easily misled.
” [emphasis
added]

The
effects of this paradigm go far beyond that of people being simply
misinformed and needing to attain more credible research. As Sykes
points out, it “also means that the more the fact-based
media tries to debunk the president’s falsehoods, the further it
will entrench the battle lines.

In
other words, all of the articles attempting to criticize the New
York Times
 interview are completely pointless (it’s not
clear whether the media’s true aim is to change the hearts of
Trump’s core support base or simply pander to the anti-Trump crowd,
anyway). The people who read those articles and agree with them do
not require further proof that Trump is a madman; they can see it
quite clearly for themselves. The people who need convincing are
almost completely untouchable by the mainstream media, who they have
grown to completely distrust. In that context, the media is merely
preaching to the choir while the rest of us have to put up with the
potential horror of a nuclear winter simply because some Americans
love a president who is ‘strong’ and will stand up for America
(unlike that liberal Muslim commie we had a few years back, some
reason).

Sykes
explains that discrediting outlets that attack the president “helps
insulate him from criticism and it allows him to create his own
narratives, metrics and ‘alternative facts.’”

Sound
familiar
?

If
you don’t believe me, take a look at this
 tweet from
January 2, 2018, where Donald Trump stated that “
[s]ince
taking office
 I
have been very strict on Commercial Aviation. Good news – it was
just reported that there were Zero deaths in 2017, the best and
safest year on record!

This
is by no stretch of the imagination,
 completely
false
,
and Donald Trump never presented any evidence that he had been strict
on commercial aviation – ever. Yet, this tweet has 83,514 likes and
15,192 retweets.

To
most of us, Donald Trump has the brain of a rambling, jealous child
who constantly takes credit for the good work done by other people
(or flat out lie instead). But to his support base, any attack on him
is automatically uncredible, and as Sykes reported, what we are now
witnessing in the age of Trump is nothing short of an “attack on
credibility itself.”

As
Sykes aptly explained:

The
Russian dissident and chess grandmaster Garry Kasparov drew upon long
familiarity with that process when 
he
tweeted
:
‘The point of modern propaganda isn’t only to misinform or push
an agenda. It is to exhaust your critical thinking, to annihilate
truth.’

Mr.
Kasparov grasps that the real threat is not merely that a large
number of Americans have become accustomed to rejecting factual
information, or even that they have become habituated to believing
hoaxes. The real danger is that, inundated with ‘alternative
facts,’ many voters will simply shrug, asking, ‘What is truth?’
— and not wait for an answer.

In
that world, the leader becomes the only reliable source of truth; a
familiar phenomenon in an authoritarian state, but a radical
departure from the norms of a democratic society. 
The
battle over truth is now central to our politics.” 
[emphasis
added]

Creative
Commons
 / Anti-Media / Report
a typo

===========================================

* Zie: ‘Trumps atoomknop is groter dan die van Kim Yung-un, bovendien werkt de VS knop wel……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

** Er is immers nooit nucleaire straling gemeten bovengronds, op de locatie waar de Noord-Koreanen hun ‘kernproeven’ uitvoeren. Dit kan de dagen na zo’n kernproef worden gemeten, zelfs middels overgaande satellieten en dat zijn er in het geval van Noord-Korea ‘meer dan een paar…..’ Het lijkt dan ook om een potje blufkoker van het Noord-Koreaanse regime te gaan, een regime dat dom genoeg blij is met de onmiddellijke erkenning van het hebben van een atoombom door de internationale gemeenschap…… Dom genoeg, daar als dit inderdaad zo is, de afschrikking van een aanval op Noord-Korea niet werkt en daar was het dit land tenslotte wel om te doen…….

Zie ook: ‘VS sluit een nucleaire aanval niet uit als een mogelijke reactie op een ‘cyberaanval…….’

        en: ‘VS op weg naar daadwerkelijk gebruik van het kernwapen…………..‘ (plus 2 extra Engelstalige artikelen)

       en: ‘VN chef Guterrez geeft alarmcode rood af voor de wereld in 2018 en niet alleen vanwege het milieu of klimaat……

       en: ‘NAVO oefent op een nucleaire aanval tegen ‘een denkbeeldige vijand’, ofwel Rusland……….

       en: ‘Top VS generaal stelt dat er een grote oorlog met Rusland op komst is, ofwel: WOIII……

       en: ‘Trumps atoomknop is groter dan die van Kim Yung-un, bovendien werkt de VS knop wel……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘VN chef Guterrez geeft alarmcode rood af voor de wereld in 2018 en niet alleen vanwege het milieu of klimaat……

       en: ‘Trumps beleid t.a.v. kernwapens brengt de VS staatsveiligheid in gevaar (en die van de rest van de wereld)

Dan nog over het bedreigen van Noord-Korea door Trump met ‘Fire and Fury): ‘Noord-Korea verkeerd begrepen: het land wordt bedreigd door de VS, dat alleen deze eeuw al minstens 4 illegale oorlogen begon……..

En om nog even te herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS, die niet op een illegale oorlog meer of minder kijkt:  ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States‘    

Over de zogenaamde Russische dreiging: ‘NAVO uitbreiding in Oost-Europa is bewezen tegen gesloten overeenkomst met Rusland…….

Trump: “Ik ben een stabiele genius….” ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Nadat
Trump eerder al constateerde dat hij in het bezit is van een extreem hoog
IQ*, deed hij daar afgelopen week nog eens een schep
bovenop met de constatering dat hij een stabiele genius is……..
Hoe gek moet je zijn, als je bij elke klepscheet, zonder na te denken twitterberichten de wereld inslingert, het aandurft om een land te
bedreigen met totale vernietiging en zelfs na een tv uitzending
besluit een luchtmachtbasis (van Syrië) met Tomahawk raketten te
beschieten…… ‘Heel geniaal, ongelofelijk intelligent en bijzonder
stabiel….’

Nadat
het boek ‘Fire and Fury’ van Michale Wolff verscheen, zoals te
verwachten door Trump afgedaan als onzin en roddel geleverd door Steve Bannon, liet het
beest weer eens een aantal tweets los op de wereld. Daarin had hij niet alleen kritiek op Bennon en Wolff, maar moest hij ‘uiteraard’ zichzelf weer de nodige veren in de vieze reet steken.

Lees het
volgende artikel van Tyler Durden, overgoten met tweets van Trump, eerder geplaatst op
ZeroHedge en door mij overgenomen van Anti-Media:

In
Bizarre Tweetstorm, Trump Defends His Sanity: ‘I Am a Very Stable
Genius’

January
6, 2018 at 7:54 am

Written
by 
Tyler
Durden

(ZHE) — Since
the first excerpts from Michael Wolff’s “Fire and Fury” were
published on Wednesday, its numerous (in)credulity-inducing details
have dominated the news cycle and most of the official press
briefings since. President Donald Trump has insisted that Wolff had
“zero” access, and that the book’s contents are gossip leaked
by former White House Chief Strategist and Trump campaign leader
Steve Bannon, whom Trump rechristened “Sloppy Steve” and slapped
with a cease-and-desist.

And,
as Trump tends to do, he doubled down on half-a-week’s worth of
denials and repudiations in a bizarre Saturday morning tweetstorm
that 
saw
him defending his sanity and intelligence while lashing out at two of
his favorite targets: Hillary Clinton and former ABC White House
Correspondent Brian Ross.

Far
from being mentally infirm, 
Trump
insists that his “mental stability” has been one of his greatest
assets “throughout my life,” along with the fact he’s “like,
really smart.”

Furthermore,
the fact that he was able to win the presidency on his first attempt,
with no prior experience in politics (except for his 2000 bid for the
Reform Party nomination, of course) prove that he’s not only a
genius but “a very stable genius” at that. Saturday morning’s
tweets essentially pick up from where Trump left off last night, when
he tweeted that “Sloppy Steve” “cried when he got fired and
begged for his job.”

Interposed
between the fiery denunciations, Trump includes a shout out of sorts
to the Washington Post, which ran a Trump-friendly headline about the
African-American unemployment rate falling to 6.8%.

Donald J. Trump


@realDonaldTrump

Michael Wolff is a total loser who made up stories in order to sell this really boring and untruthful book. He used Sloppy Steve Bannon, who cried when he got fired and begged for his job. Now Sloppy Steve has been dumped like a dog by almost everyone. Too bad! https://twitter.com/gop/status/949395088735723520 

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

The African American unemployment rate fell to 6.8%, the lowest rate in 45 years. I am so happy about this News! And, in the Washington Post (of all places), headline states, “Trumps first year jobs numbers were very, very good.”

Ross
was suspended by ABC late last year after erroneously reporting that
Michael Flynn was prepared to testify that Trump ordered him to
establish contact with the Russian government during the campaign –
an action that would be tantamount to conspiring with a foreign power
to influence an American election. However, in reality, Flynn planned
to testify that Trump senior adviser (and son-in-law) Jared Kushner
asked him to meet with the Russians during the transition, a request
that is not only legal, but routine.

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

Brian Ross, the reporter who made a fraudulent live newscast about me that drove the Stock Market down 350 points (billions of dollars), was suspended for a month but is now back at ABC NEWS in a lower capacity. He is no longer allowed to report on Trump. Should have been fired!

Trump
concludes that, since Special Counsel Bob Mueller has so far failed
to take him down, the Democrats and mainstream media are resorting to
questioning his mental stability, hoping to convince Vice President
Mike Pence and members of Trump’s cabinet to invoke the 25th
amendment – something that’s been widely discussed over the past
week.

Donald J. Trump


@realDonaldTrump

Now that Russian collusion, after one year of intense study, has proven to be a total hoax on the American public, the Democrats and their lapdogs, the Fake News Mainstream Media, are taking out the old Ronald Reagan playbook and screaming mental stability and intelligence…..

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

….Actually, throughout my life, my two greatest assets have been mental stability and being, like, really smart. Crooked Hillary Clinton also played these cards very hard and, as everyone knows, went down in flames. I went from VERY successful businessman, to top T.V. Star…..

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Donald J. Trump

@realDonaldTrump

….to President of the United States (on my first try). I think that would qualify as not smart, but genius….and a very stable genius at that!

Trump
sued Wolff’s publisher, Henry Holt & Co., to block the book’s
publication, which only inspired the publisher to move its release
date to yesterday in the interest of furthering the
public discourse
 cashing in on the hype.

Some
of the book’s claims – like the idea that Trump wouldn’t know
who former House Speaker John Boehner was despite tweeting about him
several times – have been disputed by Wolff’s fellow journalists.
Also, many of Wolff’s peers have criticized him for cynically
criticizing his fellow journalists during several television
appearances as a way to ingratiate himself with the Trump inner
circle.

* *
*

Naturally,
and not surprisingly, this morning’s twitter outburst has inspired
a flurry of responses on twitter, with users riffing off Trump’s
“very stable genius” line.

Almost
every working political journalist in the US tweeted some variation
of this:

John Avlon

@JohnAvlon

Calling yourself “a very stable genius” seems like evidence of neither.

As
more details from the book hit the web, it will surely continue to
dominate the news cycle into next week if not beyond, and if history
is any guide, expect Trump – unable to find closure – to
accelerate his angry tweets in the coming days, while digging an even
deeper hole for his critics.

By Tyler
Durden
 /
Republished with permission / 
Zero
Hedge
 / Report
a typo

====================================



* Zie: ‘Donald Trumps IQ………. OEI!!

Zie ook: ‘Trump gaat journalisten aanpakken die laster en smaad verkondigen, dezelfde handelswijze die dictator Erdogan van de islamitische staat Turkije hanteert…..

       en: ‘G.E.N.I.U.S. Trump en de werkelijke reden voor het afzeggen van zijn bezoek aan Groot-Brittannië…….

The CanaryJohn Shafthauer

Trump cancels UK visit after discovering that Teletubbies aren’t real

0m 17s1m 49s

X

Rate SpeechKit

Hier de link naar het origineel op The Canary (met tekst):  ‘Trump cancels UK visit after discovering Teletubbies aren’t real‘ (‘Off the Perch’)

VS waarschuwde regering van Zweden voor Wikileaks in aanloop verkiezingen, Assange ‘moest en zou hangen’, ofwel de zoveelste VS manipulatie van verkiezingen elders……

Mensen er zijn van die berichten die letterlijk bijna ongelofelijk zijn, zo smerig en dat (veelal) op regeringsniveau…..
Sinds het 666 beest Trump in het Witte Huis zit, met een militaire
junta aan het stuur, is het voorgaande uiteraard onzin, het regent
van dit soort berichten met daarin de doortrapte vieze waarheid, zie bijvoorbeeld de documenten op Wikileaks…….

Trouwens ook berichten met vuile handelingen gedaan door Hillary Clinton, zijn regelmatig bijna niet te geloven, ‘zeg
maar’: te zot voor woorden……… Hier het laatste voorbeeld van
dit soort berichten (althans tot rond 19.30 u. gisteravond, je weet maar nooit wat er bijvoorbeeld intussen al is uitgelekt en wat er op dit moment weer uitlekt, waarvan jij en ik nog geen weet hebben…..)……

Gisteren op ZeroHedge zo’n artikel van Tyler Durden: de VS ambassade in Stockholm waarschuwde de regering van Zweden voor Wikileaks in aanloop van de verkiezingen van
19 september 2010 in dat land. Een waarschuwing voor de verkiezingswinst van de
Piratenpartij, een winst die er volgens de VS ambassade aan zat te komen, als Julian Assange nog voor die
verkiezingen de eerder verkregen VS documenten zou openbaren in
Wikileaks………..

Twee weken later werd er in Zweden een
arrestatiebevel uitgevaardigd voor Assange, dit wegens seksueel
wangedrag tegen 2 vrouwen…… Na onderzoek werd het dossier gesloten
wegens het ontbreken van aanwijzingen en bewijzen, m.a.w. Assange werd onschuldig
bevonden…… Daarna werd het onderzoek weer heropend en uiteindelijk
in 2015 finaal beëindigd, daar de aanklacht* ongegrond bleek te
zijn…….

Uiteraard heeft deze aanklacht tegen Assange de Zweedse verkiezingen negatief beïnvloed voor de Piratenpartij, die door velen wordt gezien als een uitvloeisel van o.a. Wikileaks, immers het gros van de mensen denkt: ‘waar rook is moet vuur zijn…….’

De trouwste partner van de grootste
terreurentiteit op aarde, de VS (o.a. bewezen door de officiële VS documenten
op Wikileaks) is Groot-Brittannie, op wier grondgebied Assange
in feite gevangen zit in de Ecuadoraanse ambassade…… Assange
vluchtte die ambassade in, daar hij onschuldig was en er terecht van
overtuigd was, dat GB hem zou uitleveren aan Zweden als hij daar zou worden vastgehouden voor een bedachte verkrachting en deze zou ongegrond blijken voor de rechter, zou Zweden hem daarna op haar beurt uitleveren aan de VS…………

Nadat Zweden alle aanklachten liet
vallen, heeft het smerige geteisem, ofwel de Britse regering onder aanvoering van hare gitzwarte kwaadaardigheid May,
Assange duidelijk gemaakt dat hij bij de eerste stap buiten de
Ecuadoraanse ambassade door de Britse politie gearresteerd zou
worden, uiteraard om hem daarna uit te leveren aan de VS……..

Deze informatie komt uit de laptop van
Anthony Weiner, u weet wel de senator die een selfie had gemaakt met
een ietwat gezwollen knakworst in z’n onderbroek. De vrouw van Wiener, die vanwege een
later seksschandaal met jonge vrouwen van hem scheidde, werkte voor
Hillary Clinton en de rest is geschiedenis (en geschiedenis in wording)……

Kortom de VS
overheid heeft Assange doelbewust ‘geframed’ en het kan bijna niemand
anders zijn dan Hillary Clinton die daar de volledige schuld voor draagt, dit alles om
publicatie in Wikileaks van documenten te voorkomen, die o.a. haar smerige handelen op het gebied van buitenlandpolitiek aan het licht zouden brengen (zij was destijds minister van Buitenlandse Zaken onder Obama)…….
Ofwel de zoveelste VS ‘false flag’ operatie, je weet wel: ‘false flag’ operaties die de zogenaamde
onafhankelijke reguliere (massa-) media in het westen, immer VS, NAVO en regeringsgetrouw, afdoen als complottheorieën……..

Je weet niet half hoe
smerig overheden te werk gaan om hun barbaarse schoftengedrag te
verbergen, de VS is in dit soort gedrag de absolute kampioen……. Lees het volgende ontluisterende maar goed geschreven artikel, met verduidelijkende uitleg van Tyler Durden, zoals gepubliceerd op ZeroHedge:

Weiner
Laptop Doc: Assange Warrant Issued 2 Weeks After Swedish Election
Leaks Warning

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Weiner Laptop Doc: Assange Warrant Issued 2 Weeks After Swedish Election Leaks Warning

by Tyler
Durden

Sun,
12/31/2017 – 09:48

confidential document found
on Anthony Weiner’s laptop reveals that the United States
Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden expressed concerns in 2010 that
WikiLeaks would release classified US documents related to
Sweden ahead of the September 19 Swedish election, tipping
the vote towards the Pirate Party. The subject of the cable
reads “
Wikileaks:
The Pirate Party’s White Horse Into Sweden’s Parliament?
” 

On June
29, 2010 
a
US diplomat met with three members of the Pirate Party – which is
described in the cable as a “mixture between communism and
libertarianism,” yet whose members are “well-salaried
professionals, independent  from the party for income.” Two
of the “pirates,” according to the report, were active in
the 
“youth
branch of the conservative party currently leading government
.” 

The
Embassy cable notes the “
grim
electoral outlook for Pirates

– as confirmed by a Pirate party member interviewed by the US
diplomat, 
“Unless
WikiLeaks Saves the Day.” 

Unless
WikiLeaks Saves the Day

Two
weeks after the cable was sent, an arrest warrant was issued for
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
 on
sexual assault allegations – which was dropped, then re-issued, then
revoked again by Swedish authorities in August 2015 when they dropped
their case against him.

sdf

Cable
found on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop, 
obtained
via Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit

The
emergence of this 
confidential document
(
found
on Anthony Weiner’s laptop and sent while his wife, Huma Abedin, was
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff
),
is disturbing – as it potentially 
implicates
the Obama administration in a conspiracy to silence Julian Assange
while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State – 
not
to mention that it could be the smoking gun in 
yet
another clear case of mishandled information
 found
on imprisoned sexual deviant Anthony Weiner’s laptop the
FBI’s 
Peter
Strzok
 and
crew
 must
have somehow overlooked. 

A
brief timeline of events:
 

On August
20, 2010, 
the
Swedish Prosecutor’s Office 
issued
an arrest warrant
 for
Julian Assange

over
a rape allegation – 
two
weeks after the US Embassy met with the Pirate party and had concerns
over Assange leaking US secrets
.
The net day, Swedish cancelled the warrant.  “I
don’t think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape,”
says one of Stockholm’s chief prosecutors, Eva Finne. Swedish
prosecutors did however continue to investigate a separate allegation
of molestation, though they felt it was not a serious enough crime
for an arrest warrant. 

On September
1, 2010, 
Swedish
Director of Prosecution, Marianne Ny, 
reopened
the rape investigation
 against
Assange.

On November
18, 2010, 
Stockholm
District Court approved a detention request for Mr. Assange, who had
traveled to London. Two days later, Swedish police issued an
international arrest warrant. 
On
December 8, 2010, Assange is taken into British custody and taken to
an extradition hearing
.
Eight days later, Assange posts bail and walks free in London
until 
May
30, 2012
 when
the UK Supreme Court rules that he should be extradited to Sweden. 

August
16, 2012, Assange begins his asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in
London – where he has remained for over five years. 

In February,
2016, 
a
UN panel found Assange to be 
detained
unlawfully
 in the
Ecuadorian embassy.

asd

Julian
Assange holding UN decision

In May,
2017
,
Swedish authorities 
once
again dropped
 their
case against Julian Assange, with his Swedish lawyer Per Samuelsson
told Swedish media “It is a total victory for Julian
Assange,” adding “He is free to leave the embassy
whenever he wants.”

Unfortunately,
that’s not going to be quite so easy for the time being – as Assange
faces immediate arrest by the UK 
for
skipping bail in his extradition hearing. 
Moreover,
in April of this year, 
CNN and
the 
Washington
Post
 simultaneously
reported that 
Attorney
General Jeff Sessions’ DOJ has
 prepared
criminal charges against Assange over 2010 leaks of diplomatic
cables and military documents. 


While
the DOJ seems intent on locking Assange up, the WikiLeaks founder has
also received tremendous support from certain members of congress.


As
we 
reported
last week
,
Congressman Dana Rohrabacher travelled to London in August with
journalist Charles Johnson for a meeting with Assange, where
Rohrabacher said 
the
WikiLeaks founder offered “firsthand” information proving
that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russia, and which would
refute the Russian hacking theory
.


Rohrabacher
brought that message back to Trump’s Chief of Staff, John Kelly, to
propose a deal. In exchange for a presidential pardon, 
Assange
would share evidence that would refute the Russian hacking theory 
by
proving they weren’t the source of the emails, according to the 
WSJ


However
– when Trump was asked in late September about the Assange
proposal, 
he
responded that he’d “never heard” of it
,
causing Rohrabacher to unleash on John Kelly, who he blamed for
blocking the proposal from reaching the President. Rohrabacher
told the 
Daily
Caller

“I
think the president’s answer indicates that 
there
is a wall around him that is being created by people who do not want
to expose this fraud
 that
there was collusion between our intelligence community and the
leaders of the Democratic Party,” Rohrabacher told The Daily
Caller Tuesday in a phone interview.
 

This
would have to be a cooperative effort between his own staff and the
leadership in the intelligence communities to try to prevent the
president from making the decision as to whether or not he wants to
take the steps necessary to expose this horrendous lie that was
shoved down the American people’s throats
 so
incredibly earlier this year,” Rohrabacher said.

Contributing
to the notion of deep-state interference, CIA director Mike Pompeo
referred to WikiLeaks as a “
hostile
intelligence service

in April, calling Julian Assange “
a
fraud, a coward hiding behind a screen

for exposing information about democratic governments rather than
authoritarian regimes. This quite the ironic statement,
considering 
Pompeo used
leaked emails from WikiLeaks as proof “the fix was in”
against President Trump. 

So
– while the Swedish authorities have dropped their case against
Assange, and the UN says he’s been unlawfully detailed –
 the
UK insists on arresting Assange the moment he steps outside the
Ecuadorian embassy for jumping bail 
on
the dropped charges, 
and
the US Department of Justice is reportedly prepared to slap
criminal charges on Assange. 

Perhaps
the establishment is still a bit miffed that the “white
wizard” showed the world what’s really underneath the
pantsuit, which despite the constant rhetoric of the past year is
what ultimately cost Hillary – and so many of her charitable
friends – the election.

=============================

* Maakte een typefout in het klad: ‘aanklucht…’

Deze zaak maakt ten overvloede nog eens duidelijk dat juist de VS bezig is met het manipuleren van verkiezingen, iets waar dit ‘land’ Rusland, van durft te beschuldigen, zonder daar een nanometer bewijs voor te leveren……..

Zie ook:

Julian Assange gedemoniseerd door media die hem zouden moeten steunen, waren ze bevolkt geweest door echte journalisten……..

WikiLeaks toont aan dat VS en GB een gezamenlijke gewelddadige en bedrieglijke buitenlandpolitiek voeren

WhiteHouse: US, Ecuador Coordinating About Future Of Assange Asylum

De prijs op het hoofd van Julian Assange: 1 miljard dollar…..

Assange kan niet voor spionage worden vervolgd, immers hij is journalist >> aldus Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) in een video

Assange is journalist en zou alleen daarom al niet mogen worden vervolgd, een artikel o.a. voor de huidige ‘journalisten’ van de reguliere media en de gebruikers van die media

WhiteHouse: US, Ecuador Coordinating About Future Of Assange Asylum‘ 

Stop de isolatie van Julian Assange!’

JulianAssange (Wikileaks) haalt hypocriete Britse regering onderuit voorwijzen op belang van vrije en onafhankelijke media