In
Nederland kennen we het ook, zogenaamde professionals die het opnemen
voor foute bedrijven, foute productiewijzen, landbouwgif en die
pleiten voor het verlagen van de belastingen voor oliemaatschappijen
en andere multinationals……. Deze figuren zijn te vergelijken met de trollen die grote bedrijven inzetten om negatief commentaar van consumenten op diensten of producten via het internet tot zwijgen te brengen…..
Wat betreft de eerste groep hebben wij Remco de Boer, een zogenaamde ‘klimaatambassadeur’, ofwel
je zou verwachten iemand die tegen het gebruik van fossiele
brandstoffen en kernenergie is, echter het tegenovergestelde is waar,
deze enorme flapdrol stelt dat we nog jaren fossiele brandstoffen
nodig zullen hebben en ook moeten blijven gebruiken, ofwel hij lobbyt voor de oliemaatschappijen en de kolenboeren…..
Eerder pleitte de Boer ook voor kernenergie echter na een
paar keer flink voor paal te zijn gezet durft hij daar niet veel meer over te zeggen in zijn BNR lulpraatje op donderdagmorgen voor 9.00 u., vandaar
dat professioneel pester van Werven, de presentator van het programma
waarin hij te horen is, het van de Boer overneemt en deze zegt dan dat
we kernenergie nodig hebben om fossiele brandstoffen voor verwarming
e.d. te vervangen…….
Nee geen
kernenergie voor de elektrische auto (daar heeft van Werven de
pest aan, het zijn geen auto’s volgens hem), niet voor niets noemt van Werven zich ‘petrolhead’ en het kan hem
dan ook niet verdommen of de wereld (ook voor zijn kinderen) naar de kloten
gaat, als hij maar in de auto kan zitten met z’n dikke reet en het
liefst een auto met 8 of 12 cilinders, ofwel grote benzine zuiper
(nee, dieselmotoren zijn volgens hem geen echte motoren)…. Je
begrijpt natuurlijk wel dat van Werven de pest heeft aan windmolens,
die wil hij niet vanuit zijn tuut tuut zien en ‘ook niet’ vanaf het
strand……
Maar
beste lezer het kan allemaal veel erger, zie de door Lee Camp gepresenteerde RT video die
Brasscheck TV bracht over dit onderwerp, waarin o.a. betaalde lobbyisten, die zich voordoen als activisten en als zodanig reclame maken voor landbouwgif (al vraag ik me af wie Remco de Boer betaalt…):
Welcome to the world of Astroturf
Professional liars posing as
activists
Introducing a corporate persuasion tool
Welcome to the world of Astroturf…
No, it’s not what they put on baseball fields, it’s how
corporations create fake “protests” and “opinion leaders.”
Introducing a corporate persuasion tool.
Professional liars posing as activists.
It’s been going on a long, long time.
A whole lot of social movements are make believe.
Yes, there are people who promote GMOs, freedom for polluters,
unlimited numbers of unregulated vaccines, and lower taxes of oil
companies – but they do it for a living.
Een
belangrijk Twitteraccount, @Unity4J, waar men zaken publiceert ter
verdediging van journalist en WikiLeaks oprichter Julian Assange is geblokkeerd door
Twitter…… De beheerders van het account hebben van Twitter geen reden voor de
blokkade ontvangen……
Het is
dan ook steeds duidelijker dat de VS overheid, of beter gezegd de
Trump administratie en de geheime diensten (de belangrijkste: CIA, NSA en FBI) in de VS plus rechtse denktanks als de Atlantic Council (lobbyorgaan voor de NAVO en de rest van het militair-industrieel complex) en zelfs het Pentagon, een wel heel
dikke vinger in de pap hebben als het gaat om platforms als Twitter en
Facebook, waar Google in feite ook wordt gecontroleerd door organen als de al genoemde geheime diensten in de
VS……..
Politieke
zaken mogen blijkbaar alleen gepubliceerd worden op Twitter als dit door
zwaargewichten als Trump gebeurt en als het van de (uiterst) rechterkant van de politiek komt…. Daarover gesproken: ieder ander
met veel volgers, die woorden zou gebruiken en haat zou zaaien als
Trump, zou al lang van Twitter en Facebook zijn gegooid……. (althans dat mag je hopen….)
Laat Twitter weten dat je het account terug wil zien op Twitter, kopieer het volgende en post het ajb op Twitter: @TwitterSupport& @Jackpleasere-instate@Unity4J asap!
Lees het
volgende artikel van Caitlin Johnstone en geeft het door mensen,
het internet is van ons allen en Julian Assange zit vast omdat
hij zijn werk als journalist wel serieus nam en de waarheid naar
buiten bracht, hij dient dan ook onmiddellijk te worden vrijgelaten!!
One of the biggest
Twitter accounts dedicated to circulating information and advocacy
for WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, @Unity4J, has been completely
removed from the site. The operators of the account report that they
have been given no reason for its removal by Twitter staff, and have
received no response to their appeals.
Any
Assange supporter active on Twitter will be familiar with the Unity4J
account, which originated to help boost the wildly successful Unity4J
online vigils in
which well-known Assange defenders would appear to speak out against
his persecution. As of this writing, the account has been gone
for a day and a half.
“About 8:45am CST on
Thursday July 11, one of our Unity4J Twitter team members went to
retweet on the account and noticed that the account was no longer
accessible,” reports pro-Assange activist Christy Dopf, one of
the operators of the account. “When each of us also attempted to
access the account we all received the same message ‘Account
Suspended’. Twitter did not send us a reason or violation for the
suspension. So an appeal was submitted. We did receive correspondence
that Twitter got our request and the case is currently open.
Unfortunately we do not have a timeline on how long this could take.”
Speaking for myself as a
vocal Assange supporter on Twitter, I can say that I’ve been
following the @Unity4J account closely since its earliest days and
I’ve never once seen it post anything other than highly
professional-looking advocacy for Julian Assange. I’ve certainly
never seen it post anything that could be construed as abusive,
misleading, or otherwise in violation of any of Twitter’s posted
rules.
This
account’s deletion is just the latest in a long string of apparently
biased actions against WikiLeaks and Assange by the immensely
influential social media platform. That bias was made abundantly
clear with Twitter’s ridiculous refusal
to verify Assange while
he was posting from his own account despite his undeniably being a
significant public figure, and despite the fact that Twitter was
well aware that the account was authentic.
The platform has been receiving consistent
complaints among
Assange supporters of using shadow bans to marginalize their voices,
as well as unfair posting
locks and restrictions.
“It seems that
Assange supporters have been targeted for suspension over the last
few days and weeks, including the suspension of individuals (Yon
Solitary, Monique Jolie) as well as accounts like Unity4J,”
Unity4J co-founder Elizabeth Lea Vos told me today. “All of
these suspensions are unacceptable, but I find the Unity4J suspension
especially egregious because it was an amplifier of events across the
board, not only actions run by Unity4J. It never broke the
twitter rules and it was an activist account supporting a journalist
who’s been silenced or ‘disappeared,’ so this suspension is an
extension of that suppression. Assange asked us to become his voice,
and platforms like Twitter appear to be actively working against the
possibility of that effort.”
The main Twitter account defending Julian Assange, and therefore press freedom & freedom of speech, has been suspended.@Unity4J – suspended for defending a hero.#Unity4J
Pro-Assange activists
have been speaking out against @Unity4J’s removal.
“The
main Twitter account defending Julian Assange, and therefore press
freedom and freedom of speech, has been suspended,” tweeted comedian
and Redacted
Tonight host
Lee Camp. “@Unity4J – suspended for defending a hero.”
“HELP!!
Twitter suspended @Unity4J The global #FreeAssange supporters
account!” tweeted Assange’s
mother Christine Assange. “Its a central point for updates,
interviews and actions re my son politically persecuted journalist
JULIAN ASSANGE! Please demand @TwitterSupport and @Jack
re-instate it. Many thanks #Unity4J”
“I
have no doubt that @Unity4J’s twitter account was suspended because
it was a hub of useful information on solidarity events and actions
in support of Assange, WikiLeaks, Chelsea Manning and more.
Horrendous censorship to suspend the account,
@TwitterSupport,” tweeted Elizabeth
Lea Vos.
“If
@Unity4J is not restored, it is proof that Twitter would have sided
against the Free Mandela movement, and every other mass liberation
movement of a ‘terrorist’ turned Nobel nominee,” tweeted Unity4J
co-founder Suzie Dawson.
Many
other Assange supporters have been flagging
the attention of
the Twitter Support account and Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey objecting to
the unjust silencing of a perfectly legitimate activist account, to
no avail thus far.
The
censorship of political speech on online media platforms is a large
and growing problem.
Twitter has been better about this than the far
more sycophantic Facebook and Google, but the discrimination against
anti-establishment political speech is undeniable at this point. I
myself was removed
from the platform last year just
for saying the world would be better off without warmongering US
Senator John McCain in it, and was only restored after protests from
high-profile Twitter users.
In
a corporatist system of government, in which there is no meaningful
separation of corporate power and state power, corporate censorship
is state censorship. With giant Silicon Valley corporations aligning
themselves with shady state-funded propagandistic think tanks like
the Atlantic Council, being admonished
on the Senate floor that
they must help quash political rebellion, and being targeted
for narrative control influence by
the US military, there’s vanishingly little difference between what’s
happening more and more to political speech with these tech giants
and what happens in overtly totalitarian governments. The only
difference is the stories people choose to tell themselves about it.
The time to speak up
about this silencing is now. Your voice is next.
_____________________
The
best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the
stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list for my website,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
work is entirely
reader-supported,
so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around,
liking me on Facebook,
following my antics onTwitter, throwing
some money into my hat on Patreon orPaypal, purchasing
some of my sweet
merchandise, buying
my new book Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone,
or my previous book Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I’m trying to do
with this platform, click
here.
Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has
my permission to
republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve
written) in any way they like free of charge.
Lee
Camp de schrijver van het hieronder opgenomen artikel, eerder
gepubliceerd op Truthdig en door mij overgenomen van Information Clearing House, stelt in zijn openingszin dat het
niet de eerste keer is dat de VS regering en de massamedia het volk
van de VS een oorlog in sleept, dan wel een staatsgreep organiseert die
onherroepelijk desastreuze gevolgen zal hebben….. Die uitspraak
gaat wel op voor het eufemisme van het jaar, immers de VS
geschiedenis vanaf 1945 staat er bol van!*
Met
een terugkijk op zijn leve ten tijde van de tweede illegale oorlog
van de VS tegen Irak in 2003 en hoe hij toen de zaken bekeek, waar
hij het gevoel kreeg dat de argumenten voor die oorlog niet klopten,
ontleedt Camp 4 illegale oorlogen van de VS die op valse gronden
werden gevoerd.
Camp
begint met de Spaans-Amerikaanse oorlog, waar de reden voor een VS aanval het zinken was van oorlogsschip USS Maine in de
haven van Havanna. Daarna haalt hij de Vietnam oorlog aan en het
conflict in de Golf van Tonkin, waar VS oorlogsschepen ‘schoten op
weersverschijnselen die ze op de radar zagen……’ Oorlogsmisdadiger Robert McNamara wist op grond van deze in feite
false flag operatie**, president Johnson te bewegen de strijd
tegen Noord-Vietnam te intensiveren tot een ‘totale oorlog……’ Later gaf McNamara toe dat het Golf van Tonkin incident nooit
plaatsvond…… Let wel: deze oorlog kostte miljoenen het leven, deze slachtoffers werden niet alleen in Vietnam vermoord (3,8 miljoenmensen), maar ook in buurlanden Laos en Cambodja……
Vervolgens
komt de oorlog tegen Irak aan bod, een illegale oorlog waarvan
iedereen kan weten dat deze op basis van leugens werd aangegaan door
de VS, een oorlog die intussen aan meer dan 2 miljoen Irakezen het
leven heeft gekost (Camp noemt overigens een aantal van 1 miljoen
Irakese slachtoffers, nogal een verschil met schattingen die in Irak
werden gemaakt door deskundigen, al blijft een aantal van 1 miljoen
doden, een verschrikking waar je je amper iets bij voor kan
stellen….)
Camp
komt als eerste (hij begint vanaf het vierde voorbeeld) met het
bombarderen van Syrië. Jammer dat hij niet wijst op het feit dat de
VS al in 2006 heeft besloten dat Assad weg moest, niet in de laatste
plaats daar hij pijpleidingen over de grond van Syrië weigerde,
gaspijpleidingen van de Golfstaten richting Zuid-Europa…… (waarmee 2 vliegen in 1 klap worden
geveld, immers met dat gas zou Rusland een afzet probleem krijgen in
Europa…..). De VS heeft de opstand in Syrië georganiseerd en geregisseerd, waar deze terreurentiteit gewapende figuren van buiten Syrië als provocateurs heeft ingezet tijdens
die ‘opstand…’ Helaas voor de VS, maar deze keer mislukte de
opzet……
Camp
noemt veel meer feiten en zaken die de reguliere (massa-) media niet
brengen. Het verhaal eindigt tenslotte bij Venezuela, waarover Camp
o.a. vertelt dat oorlogsmisdadiger Bolton zonder blikken of blozen
stelde dat de VS uit is op de enorme olievoorraad van Venezuela (de
op 1 na grootste voorraad ter wereld, volgens Camp de grootste maar dat klopt m.i. niet). Deze bekentenis van Bolton werd niet eens gebracht door de massamedia, nee zij houden vol dat de arme
Venezolanen geholpen moeten worden, daar het hen aan alles ontbreekt,
‘zelfs aan tandpasta…’ (zie daarvoor ook de video van Lee Camp, die onder het artikel is weergegeven, waar hij ook op de ‘honger’ in Venezuela ingaat)
Niet
genoemd door Camp, maar de VN en het Rode Kruis hebben de VS terecht
gewezen met haar poging humanitaire hulp te politiseren,
daar deze organisaties al lang humanitaire hulp verstrekken in
Venezuela, er zijn zelfs 20 keer meer humanitaire hulpgoederen in
Venezuela (waaronder medicijnen) dan de VS heeft klaarstaan…..
Humanitaire hulpgoederen die zoals gezegd wel medicijnen bevatten, in
tegenstelling tot de humanitaire hulp uit de VS, terwijl de westerse massamedia en het grootste deel van de westerse politici in navolging van hun collega’s in de VS, dat keer op keer wel
stellen……. Nota bene USAID, de organisatie die de VS zendingen gereed maakt, heeft zelf toegegeven
dat zich geen medicijnen tussen die VS hulpgoederen bevinden….. Alweer een feit dat de westerse reguliere media niet hebben gemeld……
Lees
het volgende artikel en zegt het ajb voort, tijd dat de massamedia ook in
ons land eindelijk de waarheid brengen over Venezuela…..
We
Are Being Lied Into War Again
This
is not the first time our government and our media have conspired to
drag the American people into war with another country—or helped
create a coup that will inevitably have disastrous results
By
Lee Camp
March
08, 2019 “Information
Clearing House” – I was 23 when we invaded Iraq,
and I wasn’t sure it was based on lies, but something deep down in
me—just behind the spleen—told me it was based on lies. Kinda
like if your blind date shows up and you notice he has a 2004 flip
phone. It seems vaguely worrisome, and no explanation he can
haltingly supply will put you at ease. Plus, anyone else who acts
like it’s normal also becomes suspect.
The
invasion of Iraq just felt like it was a lie to me. And it turned out
that I was right, that it was a lie, and that the entirety of the
mainstream media and our government were either wrong or lying and,
most of the time, both.
Now
our government and our media are trying their damnedest to lie us
into another war, this one with Venezuela. They tell us the
Venezuelan people are desperate for necessities like toothpaste,
while independent journalists show
piles of affordable toothpaste in
Caracas.
And
even if they didn’t have toothpaste, that hardly seems like a good
reason for America to be dropping our long-range bad decisions on the
heads of innocent people. Turning a town into an impact crater for
the sake of a battle to stop gingivitis seems a bit extreme.
The
mainstream media and nearly the entirety of the U.S. government tell
us Juan Guaido is the “interim president,” even though he was
never elected to that position and the current president is still
leading the Venezuelan government and military. So I guess this
“interim” is the time between Guaido being a nobody and the time
when he goes back to being nobody but now gets to tell women at
parties, “You know, I used to be interim president.”
The
mainstream media also inform us that the Venezuelan military set U.S.
aid trucks on fire, when video shows opposition
forces doing it.
Furthermore, the idea of Venezuela taking “aid” from the country
whose sanctions are crushing them would be like the Standing Rock
Sioux accepting gift packages from the construction crews
swiss-cheesing their land to lay down the Dakota Access pipeline (DAPL).
Unless the boxes are filled with industrial paper towels to help
clean up oil spills, I fail to see how it would be beneficial.
Sometimes you do indeed have to look a gift horse in the mouth (or
should I say “gift
dog”).
This
is not the first time our government and our media have conspired to
drag the American people into war with another country—or helped
create a coup that will inevitably have disastrous results. So I
thought this would be a prime moment to go through the top four
greatest hits.
Number
4: The Spanish-American War
This
is widely considered to be the birth of modern media propaganda,
because it was the first war actually started
by the media.
Newspapers fabricated atrocities in the never-ending quest for more
readers.
And
as The
New York Times noted,
“[T]he sensationalistic reporting of the sinking of the American
battleship Maine in Havana harbor on Feb. 15, 1898 … and all the
other egregious reporting leading up to the Spanish-American War
might have been considered merely cartoonish if it hadn’t led to a
major international conflict.”
I
think maybe The New York Times got that quote confused with its
mission statement: “Cartoonishly dragging America into major
international conflict since 1851!”
Number
3: The Vietnam War
Sure,
most everyone knows the catastrophic Vietnam War was precipitated by
the Gulf of Tonkin incident, in which U.S. naval vessels were fired
upon by villainous North Vietnamese torpedo boats. Following that
skirmish, Defense Secretary Robert McNamara recommended that
President Johnson retaliate, and the full-force Vietnam War had
begun. But most Americans still don’t know that there was no Gulf
of Tonkin incident—unless you count U.S. naval ships literally
firing their weapons at weather events they saw
on the radar.
The 2003 documentary “The Fog of War” finally revealed the truth.
Former Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara confessed that the Gulf
of Tonkin attack did
not actually happen.
That’s
right. It never happened. Much like leprechauns or dragons or Simon
Cowell’s talent, it was a figment of our national imagination.
The
lies of our government, followed by the fawning, credulous reporting
from our media, led to the death of 58,000 U.S. service members and
as many as 3.8 million Vietnamese.
The
United States government has one of the most powerful Departments of
Fabrication and Falsification ever assembled. It’s a modern marvel
on par with the Great Pyramid of Giza and Rafael Nadal’s
down-the-line running forehand.
Number
2: The Iraq War
Of
course, there’s the most obvious lie about Iraq, i.e., that Saddam
Hussein had so many weapons of mass destruction that he would often
use one to scrub hard-to-reach places while in the tub. But that
wasn’t the only falsehood manifested to bring about our complete
annihilation of the sovereign nation Saddam ruled over. There were
others, such as the idea that Saddam was connected to al-Qaida and
perhaps played a role in the 9/11 attacks. William Safire at The New
York Times, in May
2002, wrote,
“Mohamed Atta, destined to be the leading Sept. 11 suicide
hijacker, was reported last fall by Czech intelligence to have met at
least once with Saddam Hussein’s espionage chief in the Iraqi
Embassy.”
Yes,
Safire was able to polish a load of bullshit so thoroughly it would
sparkle like a sapphire. And that column is still up on the Times’
website, without a correction or retraction. I would say the Times is
only useful for covering the bottom of a birdcage, but I’d fear the
paper would lie your pet cockatoo into an ill-advised invasion,
killing millions.
But
the propaganda didn’t even stop there. There was also the anthrax
attacks following 9/11. Anthrax was mailed to press outlets and the
offices of politicians. To this day, many people still believe it had
something to do with Iraq or al-Qaida because of award-winning
national embarrassments like
Brian Ross.
“Brian
Ross at ABC News wrote ‘the anthrax in the tainted letter sent to
Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle was laced with bentonite’ and
‘bentonite is a trademark of Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein’s
biological weapons program.’ ” As Salon so clearly put it,
“All of those factual claims … were completely false,
demonstrably and unquestionably so. … Yet neither ABC nor Ross have
ever retracted, corrected, clarified, or explained these fraudulent
reports.”
And,
as you would expect, following that blatantly false reporting, Brian
Ross did not lose his job. In fact, he wasn’t put out to pasture
from ABC News until
last year,
when he “reported that fired national security adviser Michael
Flynn was ready to testify that Trump told him to contact the
Russians during the campaign.”
That
report—much like the rumors of Brian Ross’s journalistic
integrity—turned out to be absolutely false.
(In
my professional opinion, anyone who had anything to do with the
selling, perpetrating or planning of the Iraq War should never again
hold a position higher than assistant trainee to the guy who picks up
the shit of a dog that does not belong to anyone of any particular
importance. If that position does not exist, we as a nation should
create it just for this moment. Yet, despite my objections, Robert
Mueller (head of the FBI at the time of the invasion and a big
supporter of it) is leading the biggest investigation in the country.
John Bolton, who advocated for the Iraq invasion as far back as the
1990s, is now national security adviser. Bill Kristol, who pushed for
the war and said it would last two months, is now a regular panelist
on MSNBC. And the list goes on.)
Unlike
Defense Secretary McNamara, who admitted the Gulf of Tonkin incident
never happened, we don’t have a smoking gun showing that the Bush
administration created these lies to get us into Iraq. … Oh, wait!
Turns out the paper shredder at the Bush Oval Office was on strike
for a higher minimum wage in 2002, and in fact, we do have a memo
written by Bush’s defense secretary, Donald Rumsfeld, a year before
U.S. forces unleashed a reign of terror on the Iraqi people. His memo
about warwith
Iraq stated, “How
start? US discovers Saddam connection to Sept 11 or to anthrax
attacks? Or maybe a dispute over WMD inspections?”
I’m
not sure what’s more striking—that this memo exists, or that it
sounds like the Bush boys planned a massive international battle the
same way a broke 35-year-old maps out his bad novel that he’s sure
is the ticket out of his mom’s basement.
“How
start horrible bloody war? Maybe Saddam found to moonlight as porn
star?”
Point
is, multiple completely false stories laid the groundwork for an
invasion of Iraq that left well
over 1 million people
dead.
Number
1: The Bombing of Syria
President
Bashar Assad gassed his own people, thereby guaranteeing more
American involvement—and he did it just days after Donald Trump had
told the Pentagon to begin withdrawing troops from Syria. At least,
that’s the story the corporate media repeated on-loop for at least
a month, only pausing every 10 minutes to try desperately to get us
all to buy more things with “baconator” in the name or to seek
out a harder penis.
So
we are expected to believe Assad did the one thing that would ensure
more U.S. involvement just as he was about to win his war? It’s
kinda like how, when I’m about to win a fistfight, I often poke
myself repeatedly in the eye. You know—just to keep it exciting.
Famed
journalists Seymour
Hersh and Robert
Fisk have
done great work showing that the chemical attacks never happened, but
there’s a new update. Just two weeks ago, a BBC producer came
forward and said the Douma, Syria, chemical attack footage
was staged.
His
tweet said that after six months of investigations, he can prove that
no fatalities occurred in the hospital. Yet our breathlessly inept
mainstream American media, with little to no evidence, ran around
saying, “There was a chemical attack! Those poor people! And they
don’t have toothpaste, either! We must bomb them to help them!”
The
overarching point here is that we’ve replaced our media with
stenographers to the ruling elite long ago. The ruling class comes up
with a lie to manufacture American consent for its all-American war
crimes, and that lie is then sprayed like laminate all over average
American citizens. This goes on until such time as any average
citizens who question said lie is looked at like they have two heads,
and one of them is covered in rat shit.
For
the “journalists” who hose the lies across the country the best,
awards and private jets and rooftop drinks with midlevel celebrities
like Chuck Norris await them. Now we’re getting to the point where
the actual rulers—the Trump administration, etc.—are not even
hiding their corruption. John Bolton stated
on Fox News that
the ultimate goal is to steal Venezuela’s oil. But our media
continue to tout the propaganda line. Even after Bolton said that,
you won’t see Anderson Cooper or one of Fox News’ grand wizards
saying, “Venezuela is undergoing a U.S.-backed coup because we’d
like to steal their oil.” It’s truly dizzying that the corporate
media preserve the propaganda even after the “leaders” have
revealed their true sinister intentions.
On
the inside of Wolf Blitzer’s eyelids, the phrase, “Must Defend
the Matrix” blinks in red.
The
propaganda line for Venezuela right now is, “We want to help the
poor Venezuelans.” Well, if you want to help them, then keep
America out of their face. Don’t force them to have anything to do
with the country that came up with drive-through fried food served in
a bucket and opioid nasal sprays. At no point does anyone look at the
Donald Trump presidency and think, “Wow, that country really has
things figured out. I hope they bring some of their great
decision-making to our doorstep.”
Lee
Camp is an American stand-up comedian, writer, actor and activist.
Camp is the host of the weekly comedy news TV show “Redacted
Tonight With Lee Camp” on RT America.
(de opgeblazen oorlogshitser en oorlogsmisdadiger Pompeo beweert dat Hezbollah werkzaam is in Venezuela en daar een leger heeft dat gezien zijn woorden amper onder doet voor de gezamenlijke NAVO troepen… ha! ha! ha! Ook voor deze belachelijke beschuldiging is totaal geen bewijs…)
Als
de VS zou besluiten te stoppen met zich te bemoeien met het buitenland
en daarmee de wereld naar de gallemiezen helpt, zullen de slechte
krachten winnen…… Het voorgaande is de strekking van de kop boven
een artikel dat Caitlin Johnstone gisteren publiceerde…. Ofwel: dat de wereld in chaos, dood en verderf wordt gedompeld door de VS, is beter dan een volgens de VS als demon afgeschilderde dictator of een democratisch gekozen president ‘diens gang te laten gaan’ (waarbij de VS een gigantisch aantal leugens tegen zo’n president of dictator gebruikt om haar illegale acties van een legitiem tintje te voorzien)
De
VS wordt volkomen ten onrechte neergezet als de politieagent van de
wereld, ook door een enorm aantal westerse politici, reguliere westerse media en daarmee ook door het grootste deel van de afzonderlijke westerse volkeren……. (die door hun politici en media een rad voor de ogen wordt gedraaid…….)
Ook in ons land werken de meeste politici en de volledige reguliere media daaraan mee (o.a. door het brengen van fake news [nepnieuws] en andere desinformatie), zoals door de NRC en haar volkomen ten onrechte de hemel in geprezen journalist en ‘schrijver’ Henk Hofland,
die in 2016 overleed. Hofland, volgens de reguliere media ‘Nederlands beste journalist’ van de 20ste eeuw… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! (bovendien: in het land van de blinden is zelfs iemand met 10% zicht koning….) Met de VS als politieagent heb je geen inbrekers of moordenaars nodig……. Voor berichten met Hofland, klik op het label met zijn naam, direct onder dit bericht.
De
VS verwoest de wereld met haar: -illegale oorlogen, -geheime
militaire acties, -duizenden standrechtelijke executies van
verdachten middels drones, waarbij meer dan 90% van de slachtoffers niet eens werd
verdacht, dus veelal vrouwen en kinderen…. -het organiseren van
opstanden en staatsgrepen, vaak in het verlengde van elkaar,
-economische oorlogsvoering, met als opzet een VS niet welgevallig
bewind weg te krijgen door onvrede over de economie onder een
bevolking, onvrede die moeten leiden tot demonstraties, die dan weer
tot een opstand moeten leiden….. -het manipuleren van verkiezingen
elders en tot slot: -het steunen van dictaturen, zoals die van de reli-fascistische staat Saoedi-Arabië, een zaak die
volkomen ingaat tegen de door de VS zelf gepropageerde redenen voor
ingrijpen elders: het bevorderen van democratie en vrijheid over de
wereld……..
Naast het voorgaande kan je nog stellen dat de VS de hele wereld bespioneert, zelfs haar bondgenoten zijn daar niet veilig voor, spionage ook t.b.v. grote bedrijven in de VS…..
Niet
alleen laat de VS na haar oorlogsvoering elders landen in puin
achter, maar begaat met die oorlogsvoering een enorm aantallen massamoorden, zo heeft de VS
vanaf het eind van WOII tot nu toe, o.a. met een enorm aantal grote oorlogsmisdaden en andere misdaden zoals hierboven vermeld, meer dan 22,5 miljoen mensen vermoord……. Niet vreemd dus dat de VS verantwoordelijk is voor miljoenen vluchtelingen en alle problemen die dat oplevert…….
Wat
totaal belachelijk dan, zoals ook door Johnstone verwoord, dat landen als Rusland, Syrië,
Iran en Noord-Korea volkomen onterecht en zonder enig bewijs de schuld krijgen voor de hierboven opgesomde
zaken, misdaden die de VS op grote schaal uitvoert, waar wel bewijzen voor zijn, alles mede gevoed door pro-VS
propaganda in de reguliere westerse (massa-) media en door het
overgrote deel van de westerse politici…….
De VS de goede kracht op onze wereld? Gezien de feiten kan je niet anders concluderen dan dat de VS de grootste terreurentiteit is op onze kleine aarde…..*
Zoals
al zo vaak elders en hier gesteld: YANKEE GO HOME!!
Secretary
of State Mike Pompeo told
reporters on Saturday that
the government under Venezuela’s recently re-inaugurated president
Nicolas Maduro is “illegitimate”, and that “the United
States will work diligently to restore a real democracy to that
country.”
Pompeo’s
remarks, which were
echoed by
Trump’s National Security Advisor John Bolton, are interesting for a
couple of reasons. The first is because Venezuela’s presidential
election in May of last year (which incidentally was found
to have been perfectly legitimate by
the international Council of Electoral Experts of Latin America)
was actively
and aggressively meddled in by
the US and its allies. The second is that while the US government is
openly broadcasting its intention to continue interfering in
Venezuela’s political system, it continues to scream bloody murder
about alleged Russian interference in its own democratic process two
years ago.
What
is the difference between the behavior of the United States, which
remains far and away the
single worst offender in foreign election meddling on
the planet, and what Russia is accused of having done in 2016?
According to a
comment made by
former CIA Director James Woolsey last year, it’s that the US
interferes in foreign democracies “for a very good cause.”
And
that’s really the only argument that empire loyalists have going for
them on this subject. The US is different because the US has moral
authority. It’s okay for the US to continue to interfere in the
political affairs of foreign nations while it would be an
unforgivable and outrageous “act
of war”
for a nation like Russia to do the exact same thing, because the US
is countering the interests of the Bad Guys while Russia is
countering the interests of the Good Guys. Who decided who the Good
Guys and Bad Guys are in this argument? The US.
This
“What we do is good because we’re the Good Guys”
faith-based doctrine was regurgitated with full-throated zealotry
in a
recent speech given by
Pompeo in Cairo, in which he cited “America’s innate goodness”
in making the absolutely
ridiculous claim
that “America is a force for good in the Middle East” which
has been “absent too much” from the region previously.
America’s nonstop deadly interventionism in the Middle East is
“good”, because America is “innately good”.
America’s
constant military interventionism, election interference and other
nastiness are painted as Good Things done by Good Guys to fight the
Bad Guys. The argument, when you boil it right down, is that if
America wasn’t constantly starting wars, invading sovereign nations,
staging coups, sponsoring proxy conflicts, arming terrorists, bombing
civilians, torturing people, implementing starvation sanctions on
impoverished populations, pointing nuclear weapons everywhere, spying
on us all with a globe-spanning Orwellian surveillance network,
interfering in foreign elections, and patrolling the skies with
flying death robots, the Bad Guys might win.
Sort
of makes you wonder who the Bad Guys really are, huh?
The
theme of Good Guys fighting Bad Guys resonates with a population that
has been raised for generations on Hollywood films featuring a
handsome action hero emerging victorious after a ninety-minute
struggle and karate kicking an ugly villain off a cliff before
kissing the pretty girl, but it doesn’t accurately reflect the
reality we actually live in. Our world is dominated by extremely
powerful people who are motivated not out of interest in good or evil
but a drive toward power and profit which is completely disinterested
in morality of any kind, and the empires they build for themselves
have their foundations on the backs of ordinary people who are just
trying to get by. The majority of those extremely powerful people
either live in the United States or have formed alliances with US
power structures, and all their agendas in Asia, South America, the
Middle East and elsewhere have nothing to do with “protecting
democracy” or being a “force of good”, and everything
to do with amassing more power.
Even
among those who recognize that the US-centralized empire isn’t a
shining beacon of virtue in our world, the notion remains prevalent
that if American power ceases to be a unipolar dominator then someone
worse will take over the world. This fear-based mindset ultimately
underlies all establishment manipulation and all educated support for
it: the idea that someone needs to rule and dominate the world to
prevent someone else from doing the same. But what are the fruits of
this mindset? A corporatist Orwellian dystopia hurtling toward
climate collapse if nuclear war doesn’t kill us all first.
We
can’t keep doing this. We literally can’t; we’ll evolve beyond this
fear-based dominator paradigm or we’ll all perish beneath its feet
very soon. We are now in a position where our irrational fear of
being invaded by China has pushed us to the brink of extinction, so
it isn’t even a gamble to step off that train and try something else
instead.
It
is entirely possible that the US is capable of functioning like a
normal nation and simply defending its own shores and sustaining
itself without interfering in world affairs. It is entirely possible
that the threat everyone imagines of some foreign power stepping in
as the unipolar dominator should America vacate that role is the
product of fearful imaginings with no bearing on reality and a
fundamental misunderstanding of humanity. It is entirely possible
that we are capable of creating a world where nobody dominates
anybody, and no iron-fisted world leader of any kind is needed.
Either way, the train we’re on is headed for a brick wall, so we’ve
now got nothing to lose by stepping off.
Bedenk voorts dat hierboven niet is gesproken over het vervuilen van met milieu door de VS, niet alleen met al haar oorlogshandelingen, maar o.a. ook door het dumpen van steenkool op de wereldmarkt (tegen afbraakprijzen)……..
(de opgeblazen oorlogshitser en oorlogsmisdadiger Pompeo beweert dat Hezbollah werkzaam is in Venezuela en daar een leger heeft dat gezien zijn woorden amper onder doet voor de gezamenlijke NAVO troepen… ha! ha! ha! Ook hier is totaal geen bewijs voor deze belachelijke beschuldiging…)
Caitlin
Johnstone publiceerde afgelopen zaterdag een artikel waarin ze verder
ingaat op de zuivering van het internet door Facebook en Twitter.
Waar aanvankelijk naar de inhoud van berichten werd gekeken zijn nu
de accounts van o.a. Anti-Media, WSWS (World Socialist Web Site) en
PoliceThePolice volledig verwijderd van deze 2 platforms……..
Ofwel
Facebook en Twitter fungeren als censuuragenten voor de
overheid…… Terecht stelt Johnstone dat de overheid in de VS (en
elders in het westen) nog maar weinig geloofwaardigheid over heeft, het is dan ook zaak dat organisaties als Facebook en Twitter de
functie van censuuragent op zich nemen, immers als de overheid dit
openlijk had gedaan, waren de rapen gaar geweest…….
Het
is echter vrijwel zeker dat de VS overheid platforms als Facebook en
Twitter aanstuurt wat betreft de keus voor te censureren accounts,
ook gezien een conferentie eerder dit jaar, waar WSWS over berichtte
op 5 oktober jl. Het gaat hier om een conferentie van de United
States Special Operations Command, een sectie van het ministerie van
‘Defensie’ (zou het ministerie van Oorlog genoemd moeten worden), die
supervisie heeft over de US Special Forces. De conferentie droeg de
naam ‘Sovereignty in the Information Age’ en ondanks de vage titel,
ging het er tijdens die conferentie over hoe alternatieve nieuws- en
opiniesites te censureren…… Mensen lees ook dat artikel en de
haren zullen je ten berge rijzen….*
Internet
Censorship Just Took An Unprecedented Leap Forward, And Hardly
Anyone Noticed
While
most indie media was focused on debating the way people talk about
Kanye West and the disappearance of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi,
an unprecedented escalation in internet censorship took place which
threatens everything we all care about. It received frighteningly
little attention.
After
a massive
purge of
hundreds of politically oriented pages and personal accounts for
“inauthentic behavior”, Facebook rightly received a fair
amount of criticism for the nebulous and hotly disputed basis for
that action. What received relatively little attention was the far
more ominous step which was taken next: within hours of being purged
from Facebook, multiple anti-establishment alternative media sites
had their accounts completely removed from Twitter as well.
As
of this writing I am aware of three large alternative media outlets
which were expelled
from both platforms at
almost the same time: Anti-Media, the Free Thought Project, and
Police the Police, all of whom had millions of followers on Facebook.
Both the Editor-in-Chief of
Anti-Media and its Chief
Creative Officer were
also banned by Twitter, and are being kept from having any new
accounts on that site as well.
“I
unfortunately always felt the day would come when alternative media
would be scrubbed from major social media sites,” Anti-Media’s
Chief Creative Officer S.M. Gibson said in a statement to me.
“Because of that I prepared by having backup accounts years ago.
The fact that those accounts, as well as 3 accounts from individuals
associated with Anti-Media were banned without warning and without
any reason offered by either platform makes me believe this purge was
certainly orchestrated by someone. Who that is I have no idea, but
this attack on information was much more concise and methodical in
silencing truth than most realize or is being reported.”
It
is now clear that there is either (A) some degree of
communication/coordination between Twitter and Facebook about their
respective censorship practices, or (B) information being given to
both Twitter and Facebook by another party regarding targets for
censorship. Either way, it means that there is now some some
mechanism in place linking the censorship of dissident voices across
multiple platforms. We are beginning to see smaller
anti-establishment alternative media outlets cut off from their
audiences by the same sort of coordinated cross-platform silencing
we first
witnessed with Alex Jones in
August.
This
is about as acute a threat to our ability to network and share
information with each other as anything you could possibly imagine.
If new media outlets are beginning to silence dissident voices
together in unison, that means we can see entire alternative media
outlets not just partially silenced but thoroughly silenced, their
ability to grow their audiences and get information out to heavily
populated parts of the internet completely crippled.
This
is huge, this is dangerous, and this is being under-reported. When I
was removed
from Twitter in
August for “abusing”
John McCain,
there was a large
and outraged uproaron
Twitter, and my account was quickly restored
with an apology.
The phenomenon of multiple high-profile alternative media outlets
suddenly being silenced in unison by the two biggest social media
platforms should be generating more outrage
than some ornery Australian blogger losing her Twitter account, not
less. People should be legitimately freaked out by this, because it
affects us all.
The entity that is making censorship decisions for Facebook, as publicly announced, is the Atlantic Council, a partly US government-funded entity. At what point will the extremely tight ties between these companies and the US government end the “they are private” argument?
Any
time you try to talk about how internet censorship threatens our
ability to get the jackboot of oligarchy off our necks you’ll always
get some guy in your face who’s read one Ayn Rand book and thinks he
knows everything, saying things like “Facebook is a private
company! It can do whatever it wants!” Is it now? Has not
Facebook been inviting
US government-funded groups to
help regulate its operations, vowing on
the Senate
floor to do
more to
facilitate the interests of the US government, deleting accounts at
the direction of the US and Israeli governments,
and handing
the guidance of
its censorship behavior over to the Atlantic Council, which
receives funding from
the US government, the EU, NATO and Gulf states? How “private”
is that? Facebook is a deeply government-entrenched corporation, and
Facebook censorship is just what government censorship looks like in
a corporatist system of government.
Speaking
of the Atlantic Council, it recently published a very
interesting 21-page
document about
a US military conference detailing, in present tense, how Silicon
Valley tech giants are being used to nullify the threat that the new
media landscape poses to the US power establishment.
Enter
the social media companies. The best mechanism for suppressing
oppositional viewpoints and promoting pro-government narratives is
the private sector, in particular “technology giants, including
Facebook, Google, YouTube, and Twitter,” which can “determine
what people see and do not see.”
Watts
adds, “Fortunately, shifts in the policies of social media
platforms such as Facebook have had significant impact on the type
and quality of the content that is broadcast.”
The
private sector, therefore, must do the dirty work of the government,
because government propaganda is viewed with suspicion by the
population. “Business and the private sector may not naturally
understand the role they play in combating disinformation, but theirs
is one of the most important…. In the West at least, they have been
thrust into a central role due to the general public’s increased
trust in them as institutions.”
The
best way to deal with a manipulative sociopath is to point and make a
lot of noise every time they do something weird and creepy. The more
you let them abuse you in private, the more they can rope you in and
get you playing along with their sick agendas. If you notice them
doing something weird, the best way to nullify all the tools in their
wicked little toolbox is to point and yell “Hey! What are you
doing?? Why are you doing that? That’s weird!” Get people
looking, because such beasts can’t advance their manipulations with a
lot of critical eyes on them.
Propaganda
and censorship operates very much the same way. If you are unfamiliar
with the concept of the
Streisand effect,
I encourage you to begin to acquaint yourself with it. Named for an
incident in which Barbara Streisand attempted to suppress online
photographs of her Malibu residence and thereby inadvertently drew
far more attention to them, the Streisand effect describes the way
attempts to hide and censor information can be used to draw more
attention to it if the coverup attracts the interest of the public
eye. Every censor needs to prevent this from happening in order to do
their job effectively; if it looks like removing something from
public view would draw more attention to it, then they cannot
practice censorship in that case.
So
let’s Streisand this thing up, hey? Let’s make a big angry noise
about this new cross-platform escalation in internet censorship, and
let’s make a big angry noise any time anyone makes a move to silence
dissident political speech in the new media environment. Manipulators
can only function in darkness, so let’s never give them any. Anything
they try, we need to make a ton of noise about it. That by itself
would be throwing an enormous stumbling block in their path while we
find new ways to clear a path for more and more networking and
information sharing. These bastards have controlled the narrative for
too long.
Thanks
for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make
sure you see the stuff I publish is to subscribe to the mailing list
for mywebsite,
which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My
articles are entirely reader-supported, so if you enjoyed this piece
please consider sharing it around, liking me onFacebook,
following my antics onTwitter,
checking out mypodcast,
throwing some money into my hat on Patreon orPaypal,buying
my new book Rogue
Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone,
or my previous book Woke:
A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers.
Jake
Johnson schreef op Common Dreams een artikel over de grote zuivering
van de alternatieve (echt) onafhankelijke media op Facebook en
Twitter. Het gaat hier niet alleen om het onderuithalen van de vrijheid op meningsuiting, zelfs het vormen van een mening wordt geweld aangedaan…….
Met
de reinste kul argumenten stellen deze organisaties dat ze accounts
met ‘spam’ en ‘onecht gedrag’, hebben verwijderd, ofwel Facebook
heeft ‘het gedrag van het nepaccounts hebben’ gecensureerd, accounts die
gebruikt zouden worden om de advertentie-inkomsten op te
vijzelen……
Uiteraard
gaat het Facebook, Twitter en anderen daar helemaal niet om, nee de berichtgeving in de
alternatieve media moet worden geblokkeerd, berichtgeving die ingaat tegen de
veelal van ‘fake news’ (nepnieuws) bolstaande berichtgeving door de
reguliere massamedia……. Ofwel Facebook en Twitter hebben laten
zien dat ze allesbehalve onafhankelijke organisaties zijn en geven daarbij
juist de haat- en angstzaaiende massamedia*, die zoals gezegd ook nog
eens liegen en bedriegen, alle ruimte op hun platforms…..
Facebook heeft zelfs samengewerkt met de Saoedische reli-fascistische dictatuur en werkt voorts o.a. samen met de Atlantic Council, een lobbyorgaan van terreurorganisatie NAVO (zie de links onderaan in dit bericht)…..
Nogmaals: censuur is een onderdeel van beleid in fascistische dictaturen!! Je kan dan ook niet anders concluderen dan de gang naar censuur is een grote stap richting dictatuur, waar overheden tegenwoordig ook nog eens bijna elke stap en elk gesproken en geschreven woord van een individu kunnen volgen……. De nazi’s hadden zich met deze bijna totale controle, de vieze bloederige poten nog eens extra afgelikt…..
Lees
het volgende artikel van Jake Johnson, waarin hij o.a. Anti-Media
noemt als één van de getroffen (echt) onafhankelijke mediaorganen,
een organisatie die alles uit en te na controleert voor
publicatie:
Published
on Friday, October 12, 2018 by Common
Dreams
Facebook
Accused of ‘Full-Frontal Suppression of Dissent’ After Independent
Media Swept Up in Mass Purge
The
massive shutdown affected many progressive sites devoted to covering
war, police brutality, and other issues neglected by the corporate
media
“Those
who demanded Facebook and other Silicon Valley giants censor
political content—something they didn’t actually want to do—are
finding that content that they themselves support and like end up
being repressed,” noted The Intercept’s Glenn Greenwald in
response to Facebook’s announcement. “That’s what has happened
to every censorship advocate in history.” (Photo: Legal Loop)
After
Facebook announced on
Thursday that it shut down and removed hundreds of pages and accounts
that it vaguely accused of spreading “spam” and engaging in
“inauthentic behavior,” some of the individuals and
organizations caught up in the social media behemoth’s dragnet
disputed accusations that they were violating the platform’s rules
and raised alarm that Facebook is using its enormous power to silence
independent political perspectives that run counter to the corporate
media’s dominant narratives.
While
it is reasonable to assume that some of the more than 800 total pages
and accounts shut down by Facebook were engaged in overtly fraudulent
behavior—such as the use of fake accounts and bots to generate ad
revenue—numerous independent media outlets
that cover a wide array of issues say
they were swept up in the massive purge despite never using such
tactics.
“Facebook
has removed the pages of several police
accountability/watchdog/critic groups, including Cop Block, the Free
Thought Project, and Police the Police,” Washington
Post journalist
Radley Balko noted in
a tweet following Facebook’s announcement. “They’ve also
apparently severely restricted activity for the Photography Is Not a
Crime page.”
Activist,
comedian, and political commentator Lee Camp argued that Facebook’s
purge is clear evidence that the “purging of anti-establishment
thought is upon us” and described the account shutdowns as
“full-frontal suppression of dissent.”
Everyone, this is MASSIVELY important. American censorship is reaching a new level. Sites like Anti-Media, Free Thought Project and others, have been ripped down by Facebook today. The purging of anti-establishment thought is upon us. https://twitter.com/AntiMedia/status/1050476321191669760 …
NOT ONLY were great journalistic sites like @AntiMedia and @TFTPROJECT banned from Facebook in yesterday’s PURGE of dissident voices, but simultaneously their Twitter accounts & the accounts of their editors were SUSPENDED, like @CareyWedler. Full-frontal suppression of dissent!
Speaking
tojournalist
Alex Rubinstein after they found out Facebook shut down their
pages—some of which had hundreds of thousands of followers—the
founders of Police the Police, the Free Thought Project, and other
now-shuttered pages denied Facebook’s hazy charge of “fraudulent”
activity and accused the company of attempting to suppress dissenting
voices that refuse to toe the corporate line.
“Our
approach generally is to cover stories and angles that corporate
media underreport or misreport and to amplify activist and anti-war
voices and stories. All of our content is professionally fact-checked
and edited,” said Nicholas Bernabe, founder of The
Anti-Media,
a self-described “anti-establishment” website whose
Facebook page was shut down along with hundreds of others on
Thursday. “I can only speculate that these suspensions were a
coordinated effort to stifle our message ahead of the coming
elections.”
While
some of the pages Facebook removed on Thursday were
affiliated with right-wing sites that
were spreading patently false stories, censorship opponents have long
warned of the “slippery
slope”
of empowering corporate giants to suppress certain kinds of content,
given that the suppression almost always expands far beyond the
original target.
“Those
who demanded Facebook and other Silicon Valley giants censor
political content—something they didn’t actually want to do—are
finding that content that they themselves support and like end up
being repressed,” notedThe
Intercept‘s
Glenn Greenwald in response to Facebook’s announcement. “That’s
what has happened to every censorship advocate in history.”
Though
Facebook has yet to release a full list of the pages and accounts it
removed, several
individuals affected by
the purge have taken to other social media platforms to denounce the
social media giant for squashing pages that took years to develop.
Facebook took down my page with nearly 70,000 followers, labeling it as “spam,” when I have spent 4 years working to build that page up and using it to post the articles I wrote and videos of my reporting. This is so incredibly wrong and is affecting hundreds of similar pages.
In de volgende hilarische video van Redacted Tonight (op RT America, waar Lee Camp Official Website deel van uitmaakt), vertelt Natalie McGill op uiterst humoristische manier hoe de rijken in de VS hun vermogen vermeerderen door de arme onderlaag uit te nemen. (het is hier overigens niet veel beter, schuldhulpverleningsprogramma’s werken niet of slecht met dank aan PvdA hufter Klijnsma, die ook nog eens de FNV kapot heeft hervormd….)
Lee
Camp had in zijn programma ‘Redacted Tonight’ journalist Eva Bartlett middels een videoverbinding vanuit
Beiroet. Bartlett sprak over haar ervaringen in Syrië en m.n. Over de enorme berg
leugens die de reguliere (massa-) media over de strijd in Syrië hebben gebracht. (en nog steeds brengen, zelfs al zijn een aantal leugens meermaals doorgeprikt…..)
Zo
vertelt Bartlett dat er in het ziekenhuis in Douma niemand is
overleden aan de zogenaamde gifgasaanval, ‘gepleegd door het Syrische leger….’ (oké
dat was al bekend, maar nog meer bewijs middels getuigen daarvoor kan geen kwaad,
integendeel als je ziet dat de reguliere media en het overgrote deel
van de westerse politici deze leugen in de lucht houden……)
Niet
alleen in het ziekenhuis van Douma stelde men dat er geen
gifgasaanval slachtoffers werden opgenomen dan wel dood verklaard,
maar ook de burgers van Douma stelden hetzelfde: er heeft geen
gifgasaanval plaatsgevonden in Douma……Trouwens opvallend stil
rond deze zaak, ook al heeft de VS n.a.v. (ook eigen) leugens daarover raketten afgeschoten op doelen in Syrië….. Ach de oorlogsmisdaden
van de VS halen amper of niet de reguliere media, kijk als het om de
Syrische regering of de Russische zou gaan was dit volkomen
omgedraaid en zou de boel op z’n kop staan……. Sterker nog: met grote regelmaat worden de oorlogsmisdaden van de VS goedgesproken in de reguliere westerse media…..
Bartlett
heeft ook Oost-Aleppo bezocht en stelt dat de bevolking dol blij was
met de bevrijding door het reguliere Syrische leger, waar deze
bevolking vertelde over de enorme terreur waaronder ze moesten leven,
terreur van door het westen als ‘gematigde rebellen’ aangeduide
psychopathische moordenaars, verkrachters en martelbeulen…….
Voorts
bevestigde Bartlett de verhalen over de White Helmets in Oost-Aleppo:
volgens haar (en vele anderen) zijn deze White Helmets een verlengde
van Al Qaida en andere terreurgroepen in Syrie.
Wat
betreft ‘de opstand’ die in Syrië in 2011 begon stelde Bartlett dat
niet regeringstroepen op demonstranten schoten, maar juist
demonstranten (uit andere bronnen bleek al dat hier veel
buitenlanders aan meededen) dit om de schuld in de schoenen van Assad
en het Syrische leger te kunnen schuiven, ofwel: een false flag
operatie….. False Flag operaties, ‘toevallig’ een bezigheid waar de VS al meer dan 100 jaar veruit de grote
kampioen is >> dezelfde VS die (samen met GB, Turkije,
Saoedi-Arabië en nog een paar arabische staten) al in 2006
voorbereidingen trof om in Syrië een opstand te organiseren, met het
uiteindelijke doel Assad af te zetten……..
Zie
de video hieronder, duur 15 minuten, waarna Lee Camp spreekt over de
VS politici die durfden te spreken over de ‘militaire expansie’ van
China…… ha! ha! ha! ha! De VS heeft meer dan 800 bases over de
wereld, over militaire expansie gesproken……. Vergeet daarnaast
niet dat de VS en niet China, de ene illegale oorlog na de andere
begint…..
Video:
Reporter in Syria Reveals Mainstream Media’s Lies
Ongelofelijk maar waar: in Californië kunnen welgestelde veroordeelden hun bezoek aan de gevangenis veraangenamen ‘voor maar $ 100.– per dag………’ Daarvoor krijgen ze een grote tv, een computer, een media ruimte en een nieuw bed…….
De VS ‘het land’ van de ongekende mogelijkheden, althans voor de welgestelden en de bedrijven….. De VS het land waar de grote meerderheid in de gevangenis bestaat uit jonge gekleurde mannen, ook al vormen ze een minderheid in de VS t.o.v. de witte bevolking en begingen ze dezelfde strafbare feiten als witte leeftijdsgenoten……… (m.a.w. er zouden veel meer witte leeftijdsgenoten in de gevangenis moeten zitten dan gekleurde gevangenen……)
De VS het land waar je als gekleurde man door de politie doodgeschoten kan worden, puur en alleen omdat je gekleurd bent…… De VS het land waar etnisch profileren zo ongeveer is uitgevonden en dagelijks wordt uitgevoerd door de politie…. De VS het land waar je wegens geldgebrek eerder ‘mag’ sterven, daar men geen medische hulp verstrekt als je geen poen hebt…..
In dat land kunnen welgestelde gevangenen nu dus een luxe cel huren en dat tegen een bedrag dat het grootste deel van de VS niet eens kan betalen voor een dak boven het hoofd en mensen zelfs op straat of in tentenkampen moeten leven, daar ze geen geld hebben voor onderdak……… De VS waar meer dan 50 miljoen mensen afhankelijk zijn van voedselbonnen, bonnen die een aantal republikeinen hen nog wil afnemen ook…….. ‘Dat land………’
Hier een lichtelijk komische video van 4 minuten over deze nieuwe vorm van klassenscheiding in de Verenigde Politiestaten van Amerika, een video met Lee Camp (video via Brasscheck TV):
Lee
Camp is the host and head writer of the popular comedy news TV show
Redacted Tonight with Lee Camp on RT America. The show also features
correspondents John F. O’Donnell, Carlos Delgado, Naomi Karavani,
and Phillip Chang. Salon.com said, “The finest TV satire thus
far this election season has come from the Nightly Show and Lee Camp
on Redacted Tonight.” The show has also won a 2016 Telly Award
for their live stand-up comedy special in New York City. George
Carlin’s daughter Kelly said Camp was one of only a handful keeping
her father’s torch lit. Camp is a former writer for The Onion and for
Huffington Post Comedy. He created and starred in the viral YouTube
show Moment of Clarity that was seen by millions, and he’s performed
stand-up comedy in a dozen countries and every state in the US. He
has also been featured on Comedy Central, NBC, CNN, MSNBC, MTV, FOX &
Showtime. Many know him from the viral clip of him on Fox News
calling a “parade of propaganda and a festival of ignorance.”
========================
CNN’s juridisch analist, Danny Cevallos, vindt de privileges voor welgestelde gevangenen verdedigbaar, sterker nog: die was er altijd al aldus deze neoliberale plork. Hij gaat zelfs zover deze $ 100.– per dag als extra straf te zien……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Alsof echte welgestelden daar ook maar 1 minuut van wakker liggen…. Zie: ‘What $100 can buy you in jail might surprise you‘
