Sancties van de VS zijn illegaal en zijn oorlogsmisdaden die moeten worden gestopt

De
sancties die de VS eenzijdig en dus illegaal oplegt aan landen die
haar niet welgevallig zijn, zijn niets anders dan grove
oorlogsmisdaden waardoor zelfs mensen om het leven komen….. Even ter herinnering: in de 90er jaren van de
vorige eeuw legde de VS eenzijdig sancties op aan Irak, daardoor
kwamen 500.000 Irakese kinderen om het leven, ofwel die werden in feite
vermoord door de VS…. De minister van buitenlandse zaken destijds (onder
opperschoft Clinton) was de Democraat en oorlogsmisdadiger Madeleine Albright,
toen deze psychopaat in 1996 werd geconfronteerd met dit feit en haar werd gevraagd
of ze er geen spijt van had, antwoordde deze enorme hufter
dat ze daar geen seconde spijt van heeft gehad en dat het e.e.a.
het waard was geweest…..

Ook nu zijn kinderen en andere zwakke mensen de klos, zo zorgen de sancties tegen Iran ervoor dat belangrijke middelen tegen (kinder-) kanker niet meer te krijgen zijn, of zo duur zijn dat praktisch niemand ze kan betalen…….. Wat mij betreft een misdaad tegen de menselijkheid!!  

De VS legt landen sancties op, die zoals gezegd vooral de zwakste burgers treffen (‘treffen’: letterlijk en figuurlijk)…….. Door deze illegale sancties ontstaan er voorts tekorten op allerlei gebieden, waardoor de economie in het slop raakt, daarop geeft de VS het land de schuld, bijvoorbeeld door te wijzen op een ‘lamlendig economisch beleid’, of door in geval van een links geregeerd land het socialisme de schuld te geven……… (tegelijk organiseert de CIA dan demonstraties, waarbij men het liefst ook op de demonstranten laat schieten door ingehuurde scherpschutter moordenaars, om daarmee de regering van zo’n land nog meer zwart te maken….) De VS hoopt daarmee  een opstand te ontketenen in zo’n land*,  terwijl de wat beter geïnformeerden weten dat de VS de schuld is van de ellende juist door die sancties, zie Venezuela en Oekraïne, waar deze smerige vorm van terreur bij de eerste (nog) geen succes heeft, waar het bij de laatste, zoals bekend, wel is gelukt……

Gelukkig ontstaat er wereldwijd steeds meer weerstand tegen deze smerige VS terreur, (beter is dit smerige spel niet aan te duiden, sancties die intussen tegen 39 landen (!!) worden toegepast en uiteraard voelen andere landen daar ook de gevolgen van, immers bedrijven kunnen geen handel meer drijven, daar de wereld afhankelijk is van de dollar als betalingsmiddel en de VS juist de bedrijven straft die toch leveren ondanks de sancties…… Rusland is intussen klaar voor de introductie van een nieuw internationaal betalingssysteem zodat het systeem van de VS, te weten: SWIFT, uitgerangeerd kan worden.

Het volgende artikel werd eerder gepubliceerd op Nation of Change (ICH meldt onterecht dat dit PopularResistance is) en door mij overgenomen van Information Clearing House. In het artikel een petitie om actie te ondernemen tegen de terreursancties van de VS, lees en teken deze ajb en geeft het door:

The
world must end the US’ illegal economic war

The
indiscriminate, illegal and immoral use of sanctions is an act of
war.

By
Kevin Zeese and Margaret Flowers

January 16, 2020
Information
Clearing House

The
United States is relying more heavily on illegal unilateral coercive
measures (also known as economic sanctions) in place of war or as
part of its build-up to war. In fact, economic sanctions are an act
of war that kills tens of thousands of people each year through
financial strangulation. An economic blockade places a country under
siege.

A recent example is
the increase in economic measures being imposed against Iran, which
many viewed as more acceptable than a military attack. In response to
Iran retaliating for the assassination of General Qassem Soleimani
and seven other people, Iran used ballistic missiles to strike two
bases in Iraq that house U.S. troops. President Trump responded by
saying he would impose more sanctions on Iran. Then he ended his
comments by urging peace negotiations with Iran. The United States
needs to understand there will be no negotiations with Iran until the
U.S. lifts sanctions that seek to destroy the Iranian economy and
turn the people against their government.

The sanctions on Iran
have been in place since the 1979 Iranian Revolution, which made that
country independent of the United States. Iran is not the only
country being sanctioned by the United States. Samuel Moncada,
the Venezuelan ambassador to the United Nations, speaking to the
summit of the Non-Aligned Movement of 120 nations on October 26,
2019, denounced the imposition of sanctions by the U.S., as “economic
terrorism which affects
a third of humanity with more than 8,000 measures in 39 countries
.”

It is time to end U.S.
economic warfare and repeal these unilateral coercive measures, which
violate
international law
.

Sanctions
are war. From havaar.org.

Sanctions
are a weapon of war

The United States uses
sanctions against countries that resist the U.S.’ agenda. U.S.
sanctions
are designed to kill
 by destroying an economy through denial
of access to finance, causing hyperinflation and shortages and
blocking basic necessities such as food and medicine. For
example, sanctions are expected to cause the
death of tens of thousands of Iranians
by creating a severe
shortage of critical medicines
 and medical
equipment everywhere
in Iran
.

Muhammad Sahimi writes
that in a “letter published by 
The
Lancet
,
the prestigious medical journal, three doctors working in Tehran’s
MAHAK Pediatric Cancer Treatment and Research Center warned
that
, ‘Re-establishment of sanctions, scarcity of drugs due to
the reluctance of pharmaceutical companies to deal with Iran, and a
tremendous increase in oncology drug prices [due to the plummeting
value of the Iranian rial by 50–70%], will inevitably lead to a
decrease in survival of children with cancer.’”

Diabetes, multiple
sclerosis, HIV/AIDS, Parkinson’s, Alzheimer’s, and asthma
affect over ten million Iranians who will find essential medicines
impossible to get or available only at high prices. The U.S. claims
that food and medicines are excluded from sanctions but in practice,
they are not because pharmaceutical companies fear sanctions being
applied to them over some technical violation and Iran cannot pay for
essentials when banks can’t do business with it. European
nations failed
to persuade
 the Trump administration to ensure that
essential medicine and food were available to Iranians.

In Venezuela, due
to the sanctions
, 180,000 medical operations have been
canceled and 823,000 chronically ill patients are awaiting medicines.
The Center for Economic and Policy 

Research found sanctions
have deprived Venezuela
of “billions of dollars of foreign
exchange needed to pay for essential and life-saving imports,”
contributing to 40,000 total deaths in 2017 and 2018. More than
300,000 Venezuelans are at risk due to a lack of access to medicine
or treatment. Economists warn U.S. sanctions
could cause famine
in Venezuela. Sanctions also
cause
shortages of parts and equipment needed for
electricity generation, water systems, and transportation as well as
preventing participation in the global financial market. Sanctions,
which are illegal
under the UN, OAS and US law
, have caused mass
protests in Venezuela
against the U.S. 

Sanctions against Iran
and Venezuela could be a prelude to military attack, i.e. the US
weakening a nation economically before attacking it. This is what
happened in Iraq
. Under pressure from the United States, on Aug.
2, 1990
, the UN Security Council passed sanctions that
required countries to stop trading or carrying out financial
transactions with
Iraq
. President George H.W. Bush said the UN sanctions would not
be lifted
 “as long as Saddam Hussein is in power.” The
U.S. continued to pressure the
increasingly skeptical Security Council members into compliance even
though hundreds of thousands of children were dying. In 1996,
then-U.S. Ambassador to the UN Madeleine Albright was asked about the
death of as many as 500,000 children due to lack of medicine and
malnutrition exacerbated by
the sanctions, and she brutally replied, “[The] price
is worth it
.” Sanctions were also used against Libya and Syria
before the U.S. attacked them.

This is consistent
with the U.S. ‘way of war’ described by Roxanne Dunbar-Ortiz in
An
Indigenous Peoples’ History of the United States
,” which
describes frontier counterinsurgency premised on annihilation
including the destruction of food, housing, and resources as well as
ruthless militarism. The U.S. has waged a long-term economic war
against Cuba (sanctions in place since 1960), North Korea (first
sanctions in the 1950s, tightened in the 1980s), Zimbabwe (2003) and
Iran (1979) 

Sanctions hurt
civilians, especially the most vulnerable—babies, children, the
elderly and chronically ill—not governments. Their intent is to
shrink the economy and cause chronic shortages and hyperinflation
while ensuring a lack of access to finance to pay for essentials. The
U.S. then blames the targeted government claiming that corruption or
socialism is the problem in an effort to turn the people against
their government. This often backfires as people instead rally around
the government, quiet their calls for democracy and work to develop
a resistance economy
.

Stop Sanctions
destroying lives from BrightonAndHoveNews.org.

The
movement to end sanctions

In recent years, a
movement has been building to end the use of illegal economic
coercive measures. The movement includes governments coming together
in forums like the Non-Aligned
Movement
, made up of countries that represent 55 percent of the
global population, as well as UN member-states calling for
international law and the UN Charter to be upheld and social
movements
organizing to educate about the impact of sanctions and
demand an end to their use. This June, the Non-Aligned
Movement called
for the end of sanctions against Venezuela.

Popular Resistance is
working with groups around the world on the
Global Appeal for Peace
, an initiative to create a worldwide
network of people and organizations that will work together to oppose
the lawless actions of the United States, and any country that acts
similarly. A high priority is opposing the imposition of unilateral
coercive economic measures that violate the charter of the United
Nations. The UN and its International Court of Justice have been
ineffective in holding the U.S. accountable for its actions. No one
country or one movement has the power alone to hold the United States
accountable, but together we can make a difference. Join
this campaign here
.

With 39 countries
targeted with sanctions, and other countries impacted because they
cannot trade with those countries, nations are challenging the U.S.’
dollar domination. Countries are seeking to conduct trade without the
dollar and are no longer treating the U.S. dollar as the world’s
reserve currency while also avoiding Wall Street. The
de-dollarization
of the global economy
is a boomerang effect that is hastening due
to the abuse of sanctions and will seriously weaken the U.S. economy.

Foreign Minister
Zarif,
who describes sanctions as “economic terrorism
,” warned that
“the excessive use of economic power by the United States, and the
excessive use of the dollar as a weapon in U.S. economic terrorism
against other countries, will backfire.”  As the blowback
continues to grow, the negative impact on the U.S. economy may
force the U.S. to stop using sanctions. The end of dollar domination
will add to the demise of the failing U.S. empire.


End
the Deadly Sanctions banner on the Venezuelan Embassy in Washington,
D.C. From the Embassy Defense Collective.

Time
to end the use of illegal economic sanctions

The combination of
countries acting against U.S. sanctions, and people’s movements
pressuring the U.S. government has the potential to end the abuse of
sanctions. The EU
has moved to blunt the impact
of the sanctions against Iran by
creating an alternative
to the U.S.-controlled SWIFT
system for trade. This is spurring
the end of the dollar
as the reserve currency. Some officials in
the EU have called for retaliatory
sanctions
against the U.S.

Trump left a small
opening for potential diplomacy with Iran that could lead to the end
of sanctions against that country. Trump bragged about the U.S. being
the number one oil and gas producer, taking credit for an Obama
climate crime, and therefore no longer needing to spend hundreds of
millions a year to have troops in the Middle East. He concluded with
a message to the “people and leaders of Iran” that the U.S. was
“ready to have peace with all those who seek it.” He said the
U.S. wanted Iran to have a “great and prosperous future with other
countries of the world.”

That future is only
possible if the U.S. moves to end the sanctions against Iran.
Iranians have learned the U.S. cannot be trusted. Iran lived up to
the requirements of the Iran nuclear deal, the Joint Comprehensive
Plan of Action, but Trump did not when he
withdrew from it
 and re-instated
draconian sanctions
lifted by Obama. Trump added even move
sanctions. This also angered
European allies
 who had negotiated the agreement and were
put in the position
of being subservient to the U.S. or going
against it. To regain Iran’s trust, the U.S. needs to make a
good-faith gesture of ending punitive economic measures.

North Korea, which has
been sanctioned by the U.S. longer than any other country, had a
similar experience after they reached an agreement with the United
States in 1994 under the Clinton administration.  The George W.
Bush administration wanted to put in place a national missile
defense system but the agreement with North Korea blocked that. John
Bolton and Dick Cheney falsely accused
 North Korea of
violating the agreement, increased sanctions against it and claimed
it was part of the Axis of Evil, along with Iran, and Iraq. 

North
Korea, like Iran, learned they cannot trust the United States.
Sanctions
are causing thousands of deaths
in North Korea. Now, China
and Russia are allied
 with North Korea and are urging relief
from the U.S. sanctions. Russia and China
have also ignored U.S. sanctions
against Venezuela and continue
to do business with it.

On December 17,
the Senate passed a Sanctions Bill that put in place sanctions
against corporations working with Russia to develop gas pipelines to
Europe. The action is naked
U.S. imperialism seeking to prevent 
Russia from being the
main natural gas exporter (NS2) to the EU market and to replace it with
more expensive U.S.-produced gas, a move to save the
financially-underwater U.S. fracking industry. Russia, Germany,
and others have defiantly told Washington
its weaponizing of economic sanctions will not halt the gas pipeline
construction. 

The indiscriminate,
illegal
and immoral use of sanctions
is an act of war. Unless they are
authorized by the United Nations, unilateral coercive measures are
illegal. A critical objective of the peace and justice movement in
the United States, working with allies around the world, must be to
end this terrorist economic warfare. The U.S. economy currently
depends on financial hegemony and war. The slow, steady collapse of
the dollarized economy means the 2020s will be the decade U.S.
domination comes to an end. The U.S. must learn to be a cooperative
member of the global community or risk this isolation and
retaliation.

Kevin
Zeese is an American political activist who has been a leader in the
drug policy reform and peace movements and in efforts to ensure a
voter verified paper audit trail. Margaret Flowers, M.D., is a
Maryland pediatrician seeking the Green Party nomination for the US
Senate. She is co-director of PopularResistance.org and a board
adviser to Physicians for a National Health Program and is on the
Leadership Council of the Maryland Health Care Is a Human Right
campaign.

This
article was originally published by “PopularResistance

==================================

* Tegelijk stoken zoals gezegd CIA agenten het vuurtje op en bewapenen in veel gevallen een
aantal scherpschutter moordenaars, zodat deze slachtoffers maken onder de demonstranten, vervolgens wordt
de schuld daarvoor in de schoenen van de onwelgevallige
regering geschoven….. Iets dergelijks wordt een ‘false flag operatie’ genoemd, de VS gebruikte dit o.a. in Oekraïne en Syrië, waar deze terreuroperatie in het laatste land mislukte.

Zie ook:

Moordenaar van Soleimani komt om bij neerhalen van VS spionage vliegtuig in Afghanistan‘ 

KLM vliegt weer over oorlogsgebied Iran – Irak, terwijl andere maatschappijen waaronder Air France het gebied mijden‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht anders, dan de hier getoonde)

Soleimani moord: VS pleegde een daad van oorlog‘ 

Rampvlucht TWA 800 vs. PS752

Trudeau (premier Canada): de VS is verantwoordelijk voor de vliegramp in Iran

Voor meer berichten over sancties of andere zaken uit dit bericht, klik op de betreffende links, die je direct onder dit bericht terug kan vinden. 

Assange is journalist en zou alleen daarom al niet mogen worden vervolgd, een artikel o.a. voor de huidige ‘journalisten’ van de reguliere media en de gebruikers van die media

Vorige
week werden er wereldwijd pro-Assange demonstraties gehouden die gewijd waren aan de hachelijke situatie waarin
Julian Assange zich bevindt, in feite gevangen in de Ecuadoraanse
ambassade in Londen, dit daar hij onmiddellijk zal worden
gearresteerd als hij zich buiten de deur waagt (de ambassade wordt 24
uur per dag in de gaten gehouden door meerdere agenten, wat intussen
al een godsvermogen moet hebben gekost…)…..

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

Als
Groot-Brittannië hem uitlevert, wacht Assange naar grote
waarschijnlijkheid een levenslange gevangenisstraf, de straf die hem
maximaal kan worden opgelegd, gezien de situatie in de VS
 
is
het inderdaad zeer waarschijnlijk dat deze straf hem daadwerkelijk zal worden
opgelegd…..

Straf
voor het uitvoeren van zijn taak als journalist, het controleren van
de overheid en dat in de breedste zin van het woord…. Door
WikiLeaks hebben klokkenluiders in de VS een medium gekregen waar
zij, na hun meestal al meerdere malen tevergeefs gedane pogingen om een eind te maken aan misstanden die zij tijdens hun werk tegenkomen, deze zaken (of zaak) openbaar te maken. 


Misstanden waar ofwel hun meerderen geen belangstelling voor hebben, daar dit hun positie in gevaar zou kunnen brengen, dan wel dat hen door die meerderen te verstaan wordt gegeven de mond te houden, daar hen anders ontslag en/of een rechtszaak wacht…….. Natuurlijk zijn er voldoende klokkenluiders die weten dat de enige mogelijkheid is anoniem een zaak direct in de media te brengen, daar overleg met meerderen over een misstand op zeker tot ontslag zal leiden…..

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

In
feite is de zaak tegen Assange een zaak tegen alle overheidsdienaren
die met grote regelmaat fikse misstanden zien en tegen alle
journalisten die nog wel hun werk doen zoals dat bedoeld is voor die functie….
Lullig genoeg zijn dat niet de journalisten van de reguliere media,
die ofwel gevangen zitten in het harnas van de overheid, ‘journalisten’ van de zogenaamde publieke omroepen en de ‘journalisten’ van de andere
media die in het bezit zijn van welgestelde personen (zoals hufter Murdoch), dan wel grote
mediabedrijven die aan de beurs genoteerd staan en die geen belang
hebben bij kritiek op de overheid of het bedrijfsleven, beter gezegd
die er geen belang bij hebben dat bijvoorbeeld het inhumane, ijskoude
neoliberalisme wordt bekritiseerd (met feiten!)……….

In
Nederland hebben we het vermaledijde klokkenluidershuis, en dat is verworden tot één grot
fiasco, waar dit huis zelfs na 2 jaar niet één zaak heeft afgerond, laat staan dat er zaken openbaar werden gemaakt…… (waardoor misstanden blijven bestaan…) Het smerige aan dit
klokkenluidershuis is dat mensen die zich aangemeld hebben, met
niemand, zelfs niet met huisgenoten of familie mogen praten over deze
zaak…… Terwijl klokkenluiders meestal al een paar jaar hebben
gewacht voor zij zaken in de openbaarheid willen brengen, of ze zijn met de kop tegen de muur gelopen bij hun
directie of leiding en er derhalve alle belang bij hebben dat hun zaak juist snel in de
openbaarheid komt, dit (nogmaals) om een eind te maken aan misstanden, ze zijn immers niet voor niets klokkenluider……….

Uiteraard
is de democratie gebaat bij een site als WikiLeaks, het is juist in
ons aller belang dat bijvoorbeeld corruptie en dergelijke zaken aan
het licht komen, zodat er een eind aan die corruptie kan worden
gemaakt…… Het lullige is dat het overgrote deel van de westerse
politici bijna dagelijks de mond vol hebben over bestrijding van
corruptie en voorheen over transparantie, maar er in werkelijkheid niets aan willen doen en zaken zo gesloten mogelijk willen houden….. (waar nog opgemerkt dient te worden dat het woord ‘transparantie’ in tegenstelling tot een paar jaar geleden nog maar zelden wordt gebruikt door die politici….)

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

Het
overgrote deel van de reguliere (massa-) media die berichtten over WikiLeaks en over Assange toen hij net in de Ecuadoraanse ambassade was gevlucht, spraken de VS overheden na, vooral de ‘uiterst betrouwbare’, CIA….. Waar deze terreurorganisatie stelde dat er
uiterst gevaarlijke informatie was gelekt en dat daardoor honderden
zo niet duizenden mensen in gevaar zouden zijn gekomen….. 


Deze
media deden niet eens moeite de gelekte documenten te lezen en te zien
of de CIA en de VS regering wel de waarheid spreken…. Zeker gezien het feit dat de CIA heel vaak liegt, wat ook geldt voor de regering van de VS, nu de Trump administratie. Nee, voor de reguliere westerse media en het grootste deel van de westerse politici geldt dat de staat en de CIA hebben gesproken, dus ‘klaar en waar……’

Het
is dan ook ronduit een schande dat zogenaamde journalisten meehuilen
in het meer dan valse CIA koor…….

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Assange Is a Journalist and Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

Lees
het volgende artikel van Kevin Zeese en Margaret Flowers, die nog
veel dieper op de zaak ingaan en zegt het voort, het is de hoogste
tijd dat liegende politici en media aan de paal worden
genageld voor al hun leugens, smerige spelletjes en het belazeren van het volk respectievelijk de gebruikers van de reguliere media…………

Assange
Is a Journalist, Should Not Be Persecuted for Publishing the Truth

by Kevin
B. Zeese
 and Margaret
Flowers

June 29, 2018

Last
week, rallies in support of Julian Assange were held around the
world. We participated in two #AssangeUnity events seeking to
#FreeAssange in Washington, DC.

This
is the beginning of a new phase of the campaign to stop the
persecution of Julian Assange and allow him to leave the Ecuadorian
Embassy in London without the threat of being arrested in the UK or
facing prosecution by the United States.


The
Assange Case Is a Linchpin for Freedom of the Press and Freedom of
Information in the 21st Century

The
threat of prosecution against Julian Assange for his work as
editor-in-chief of WikiLeaks will be a key to defining what Freedom
of the Press means in the 21st Century. Should people be allowed to
know the truth if their government is corrupt, violating the law or
committing war crimes? Democracy cannot exist when people are misled
by a concentrated corporate media that puts forth a narrative on
behalf of the government and big business.

This
is not the first time that prosecution of a journalist will define
Freedom of the Press. Indeed, the roots of Freedom of the Press in
the United States go back to 
the
prosecution of John Peter Zenger,
 a
publisher who was accused of libel in 1734 for publishing articles
critical of the British royal governor, William Cosby. Zenger was
held in prison for eight months awaiting trial. In the trial, his
defense took its case directly to the jury.

For
five hundred years, 
Britain
had made it illegal to publish “any slanderous News”
 that
may cause “discord” between the king and his people. Zenger’s
defense argued that he had published the truth about Cosby and
therefore did not commit a crime. His lawyer “argued that telling
the truth did not cause governments to fall. Rather, he argued,
‘abuse of power’ caused governments to fall.” The jury heard
the argument, recessed and in ten minutes returned with a not guilty
verdict.

The
same issue is presented by Julian Assange — publishing the truth is
not a crime. WikiLeaks, with Assange as its editor and publisher,
redefined reporting in the 21st Century by 
giving
people the ability to be whistleblowers to reveal the abuses of
government and big business
.
People anonymously send documents to WikiLeaks via the Internet and
then after reviewing and authenticating them, WikiLeaks publishes
them. The documents sometimes reveal serious crimes, which has
resulted in Assange being threatened with a secret indictment for
espionage that could keep him incarcerated for the rest of his life.

This
puts the Assange case at 
the
forefront of 21st Century journalism
 as
he is democratizing the media by giving people the power to know the
truth not reported, or falsely reported, by the corporate media.
Breaking elite control over the media narrative is a serious threat
to their power because information is power. And, with the internet
and the ability of every person to act as a media outlet through
social and independent media, control of the narrative is moving
toward the people.

WikiLeaks
is filling a void with 
trust
in the corporate media at record lows
.
A recent Gallup Poll found 
only
32% trust the media
.
There has been a significant 
drop
in newspaper circulation and revenue
,
an 
ongoing
decline since 1980
.
Also, 
fewer
people rely on television for news.

In
this environment, the Internet-based news is becoming more dominant
and WikiLeaks is a particular threat to media monopolization by the
elites. Research is showing that 
independent
and social media are having an impact on people’s opinions
.

The
threats to Julian Assange are occurring when 
dissent
is under attack
,
particularly 
media
dissent;
 the FBI
has a task force to monitor social media
.
The attack on 
net
neutrality
Google using algorithms to prevent
searches
 for alternative
media
 and Facebook controlling the
what people see
 are
all part of the attack on the democratized media.


The
Astounding Impact of WikiLeaks’ Reporting

The
list of WikiLeaks’ revelations 
has
become astounding
.
The release of 
emails
from Hillary Clinton
her
presidential campaign
,
and the 
Democratic
National Committee
 had
a major impact on the election. People saw the truth of 
Clinton’s
connections to Wall Street
,
her 
two-faced
politics
 of
having a public view and a private view as well as the 
DNC’s
efforts to undermine the campaign of Sen. Bernie Sanders
.
People saw the truth and the truth hurt Hillary Clinton and the
Democrats.

Among
the most famous documents published were those provided by Chelsea
Manning on 
IraqAfghanistan,
the 
Guantanamo
Prison
 and
the 
US
State Department
.
The 
Collateral
Murder
 video
among the Manning Iraq war documents shows US soldiers in an Apache
helicopter gunning down a group of innocent men, including two
Reuters employees, a photojournalist, and his driver, killing 16 and
wounding two children. Millions have viewed the video showing that
when a van pulled up to evacuate the wounded, the 
soldiers
again opened fire
.
A soldier says, “Oh yeah, look at those dead bastards.”

Other
significant intelligence leaks followed, i.e., 
Vault
7
,
documents on the Central Intelligence Agency’s activities,
and 
Vault
8,
 which
included source code on CIA malware activities.

WikiLeaks
has also published documents on other countries, e.g. WikiLeaks
published a series of 
documents
on Russian spying
WikiLeaks
has been credited by many with helping to spark the Tunisian
Revolution
 which
led to the Arab Spring, e.g., showing the widespread 
corruption
of the 23-year rule of the Ben Ali
Foreign
Policy
 reported
 that
“the candor of the cables released by WikiLeaks did more for Arab
democracy than decades of backstage U.S. diplomacy.” 
WikiLeaks’
publications 
provided
democracy activists in Egypt with information needed to spark
protests and 
provided
background
 that
explained the Egyptian uprising. Traditional media publications
like 
the New
York Times
 relied
on WikiLeaks
 to
analyze the causes of the uprising.

WikiLeaks
informed the Bahrain public about their government’s cozy
relationship with the US, describing a 
$5
billion joint-venture with Occidental Petroleum
 and $300
million in US military sales
 and
how the 
US
Navy is the foundation
 of
Bahrain’s national security.

John
Pilger describes WikiLeaks’ documents, writing
,
“No investigative journalism in my lifetime can equal the
importance of what WikiLeaks has done in calling rapacious power to
account.”


Assange
Character Assassination And Embassy Imprisonment

Julian
Assange made powerful enemies in governments around the world,
corporate media, and big business because he burst false narratives
with the truth. As a result, governments fought back, including the
United States, Great Britain, and Sweden, which has led to Assange
being trapped in the embassy of Ecuador in London for six years.

The
root of the incarceration were allegations in Sweden. Sweden’s
charges against Assange were 
initially
dropped
 by
the chief prosecutor, 
two
weeks later they found a prosecutor
 to
pursue a rape investigation. One of the women had 
CIA
connections 
and
bragged about her relationship with Assange in 
tweets
she tried to erase. She even 
published a
7-step program for legal revenge against lovers. The 
actions
of the women do not seem to show rape
 or
any kind of abuse. One woman held a party with him after the
encounter and another went out to eat with him. In November
2016, 
Assange
was interviewed by Swedish prosecutors
 for
four hours at the Ecuadorian embassy. In December 2016, Assange
published 
tweets
showing his innocence and the sex was consensual
.
Without making a statement on Assange’s guilt, the 
Swedish
investigators dropped the charges
 in
May 2017. The statute of limitations for Swedish charges will be up
in 2020.

As John
Pilger pointed out,
 “Katrin
Axelsson and Lisa Longstaff of Women Against Rape summed it up when
they wrote, ‘The allegations against [Assange] are a smokescreen
behind which a number of governments are trying to clamp down on
WikiLeaks for having audaciously revealed to the public their secret
planning of wars and occupations with their attendant rape, murder,
and destruction… The authorities care so little about violence
against women that they manipulate rape allegations at will.’”

Assange
is still trapped in the embassy as he 
would
be arrested for violating his bail six years ago
.
But, the real threat to Assange is the possibility of a secret
indictment against him in the United States for espionage. US and
British officials have refused to tell Assange’s lawyers whether
there was a sealed indictment or a sealed extradition order against
him. Former CIA Director, now Secretary of State, Mike 
Pompeo
has described WikiLeaks as a non-state hostile intelligence
service
 and described
his actions as not protected
 by
the First Amendment. In April 2017, 
CNN
reported
,
“US authorities have prepared charges to seek the arrest of
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange.” The Obama Justice Department
determined it would be difficult to bring charges against Assange
because WikiLeaks wasn’t alone in publishing documents stolen by
Manning but the Trump DOJ believes he could be charged as an
accomplice with Edward Snowden.

When
the president campaigned, 
Trump
said he loved WikiLeaks
 and
regularly touted their disclosures. But, in April 2017, Attorney
General Jeff S
essions
said that Assange’s arrest is a “priority
.”


Time
To Stop the Persecution of Julian Assange

The
smearing of Assange sought to discredit him and undermine the
important journalism of WikiLeaks. 
Caitlin
Johnstone writes
 that
they smear him because “they can kill all sympathy for him and his
outlet, it’s as good for their agendas as actually killing him.”

Even
with this character assassination many people still support Assange.
This was seen during the 
#Unity4J
online vigi
l,
which saw the participation of activists, journalists, whistleblowers
and filmmakers calling for the end of Assange’s solitary
confinement and his release. This was followed a week later by 
20
protests around the world calling for Assange’s release
.

Julian
Assange has opened journalism’s democracy door; the power to report
is being redistributed, government employees and corporate
whistleblowers have been empowered and greater transparency is
becoming a reality. The people of the United States should demand
that Assange not face prosecution and embrace a 21st Century
democratized media that provides greater transparency and accurate
information about what government and business interests are doing.
Prosecuting a news organization for publishing the truth, should be
rejected and Assange should be freed.

You
can support Julian Assange by spreading the word in your communities
about what is happening to him and why. You can also show support for
him on social media. We will continue to let you know when there are
actions planned. And you can support the WikiLeaks Legal Defense
Fund, run by the Courage Foundation, at 
IAmWikiLeaks.org.

Kevin
Zeese and Margaret Flowers co-direct 
Popular
Resistance
.
Kevin Zeese is on the advisory board of the Courage Foundation. This
article first appeared as the
weekly
newsletter
 of
the organization.

Read
more by Kevin B. Zeese

===============================

Zie ook:

Julian Assange, valse beschuldigingen, Big Brother en VS steun voor terrorisme

WhiteHouse: US, Ecuador Coordinating About Future Of Assange AsylumDit is een artikel van Caitlin Johnstone (Rogue Journalist) en sluit perfect aan op het hierboven opgenomen artikel, waarin je overigens ook een link vindt naar een ander Johnstone artikel over deze zaak.

Julian Assange gedemoniseerd door media die hem zouden moeten steunen, waren ze bevolkt geweest door echte journalisten……..

WikiLeaks toont aan dat VS en GB een gezamenlijke gewelddadige en bedrieglijke buitenlandpolitiek voeren

De prijs op het hoofd van Julian Assange: 1 miljard dollar…..

Assange kan niet voor spionage worden vervolgd, immers hij is journalist >> aldus Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) in een video

Stop de isolatie van Julian Assange!’

Julian Assange (Wikileaks) haalt hypocriete Britse regering onderuit voorwijzen op belang van vrije en onafhankelijke media

Volkskrant en Nieuwsuur Fake News over ‘Russische hacks…..’

VS waarschuwde regering van Zweden voor Wikileaks in aanloop verkiezingen, Assange ‘moest en zou hangen’, ofwel de zoveelste VS manipulatie van verkiezingen elders……

Klokkenluidershuis zoals verwacht één grote mislukking………

Plasterk adviseert klokkenluidershuis niet onder te brengen bij ombudsman

Klokkenluiders in vervolg vogelvrij, een nieuwe EU wet…….

‘Huis voor Klokkenluiders’ bedoelt om klokkenluiden tegen te gaan………

Sven Kockelmann is overtuigd dat politici eerlijk zijn en van lobbyisten heeft hij nooit gehoord……… ha! ha! ha! ha!

AIVD geïnfiltreerd in Klokkenluidershuis, dat is ‘gewoon’ gebruik maken van vakkrachten……… ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Klokkenluidershuis een fiasco, zoals voorspeld………

Huis voor Klokkenluiders blijkt nog groter fiasco dan eerder gedacht…… Wat wil je? Opgezet op initiatief van bedrijven lobbykabinet Rutte 2……

Stop ‘Trade Secrets Protection Directive!’ Daarmee worden we overgeleverd aan bedrijven……..

 ‘Rutte 3 gaat 20 miljoen investeren in ‘onafhankelijke’ onderzoeksjournalistiek….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Britse regering wil klokkenluiders tot 14 jaar gevangenisstraf geven………… Leve de vrije nieuwsgaring!!

Venezuela: VS verandering van regime mislukt >> de Venezolanen wacht een VS invasie

Na
alle moeite die de VS zich al 20 jaar getroost om een eind te maken
aan het democratisch gekozen socialistisch bewind van Venezuela,
wijst alles erop dat de VS bezig is met Peru, Colombia en Brazilië, van wie de laatste twee landen grenzen aan Venezuela, een invasie voor te bereiden in dat land……..

Er
hebben in 2017 al vier grote militaire oefeningen plaats gevonden in Latijns Amerika en
zelfs de NAVO schijnt nu een militaire basis te hebben in
Brazilië, waarschijnlijk dezelfde als de ‘tijdelijke’ militaire VS basis in Brazilië, in de buurt waar Venezuela, Brazilië en Colombia aan elkaar grenzen…… Zoals gezegd: vorig jaar hebben er maar liefst 4 grote militaire oefeningen plaatsgevonden, met deelname van Colombia, Brazilië en Peru, alles o.l.v. de VS….. Eén van die oefeningen, ‘Operation: America United’ was zelfs de grootste militaire oefening ooit gehouden in Midden- en Zuid-Amerika (Latijns Amerika)………

Overigens heeft de VS al militaire bases in Colombia en het Caraïbisch gebied, onderhoudt daarnaast innige banden met andere landen in de buurt van Venezuela, wat dat betreft is Venezuela al omsingeld met VS militaire bases (uiteraard speelt ook Nederland weer ‘een mooie rol’ in deze…)

De
VS is al meer dan 18 jaar bezig met een economische oorlog tegen
Venezuela, al heeft deze tot nu toe weinig of niets opgeleverd wat betreft ‘regime change’. Al
onder ‘vredesduif’ Obama heeft de VS deze oorlog verscherpt en VS
bedrijven ‘dringend aangeraden’ hun supermarktketens in Venezuela
niet langer te bevoorraden. Hetzelfde deed de VS met buitenlandse
investeerders en je weet het waarschijnlijk wel, als de VS dreigt, gehoorzamen de bedrijven en instellingen, daar ze het anders wel
kunnen vergeten als bedrijf of instelling……..

Als gevolg van deze boycot is er niet alleen een groot tekort aan levensmiddelen, maar bijvoorbeeld ook aan medicijnen. Daarmee kan de VS ten overvloede nog eens worden aangewezen als een terreurstaat, die schijt heeft aan ellende onder de gewone bevolking en aan mensenrechten, zoals dit gestolen land al zo vaak elders heeft laten zien, maar zeker in Zuid- en Midden-Amerika…….

De gewelddadige demonstraties in Venezuela van vorig jaar, werden ook al door de VS georganiseerd, waar zelfs gewapende groepen uit het buitenland werden ingezet tegen politie en leger van Venezuela……

In 2002 heeft er al een militaire coup plaatsgevonden in Venezuela, die met hulp van de (arme) bevolking de kop werd ingedrukt, een coup die zoals gewoonlijk werd geregisseerd door de CIA…….

Een
militaire coup nu lijkt zeer onwaarschijnlijk ,daar het leger voor het
overgrote deel achter de socialistische regering Maduro staat.

Lees
het volgend uitstekende en sterk onderbouwde artikel dat duidelijk maakt waar de VS mee bezig is
t.a.v. Venezuela, een artikel van Kevin Zeese en Maragaret Flowers, door
Anti-Media overgenomen van Consortium News:

US
Regime Change Fails in Venezuela: Military Coup or Invasion Next?

February
14, 2018 at 10:27 am

Written
by 
Consortium
News

(CN) — Several
signals point to a possible military strike on Venezuela, with
high-ranking officials and influential politicians making clear that
it is a distinct possibility.

Speaking
at his alma mater, the University of Texas, on February 1, Secretary
of State Tillerson 
suggested a
potential military coup in in the country. Tillerson
then 
visited
allied Latin American countries
 urging
regime change and more economic sanctions on Venezuela. Tillerson is
also reportedly considering banning the processing or sale of
Venezuelan oil in the United States and is discouraging other
countries from buying Venezuelan oil.

In
a series of tweets, Senator 
Marco
Rubio
,
the Republican from Florida, where many Venezuelan oligarchs live,
openly called for a military coup in Venezuela. “The world would
support the Armed Forces in 
#Venezuela if
they decide to protect the people & restore democracy by removing
a dictator,” the former presidential candidate 
tweeted.

How
absurd — remove an elected president with a military coup to
restore democracy? Does that pass the straight face test? This
refrain of Rubio and Tillerson seems to be the nonsensical public
position of U.S. policy.

The
U.S. has been 
seeking
regime change
 in
Venezuela since Hugo Chavez was elected in 1998. Trump 
joined
Presidents Obama and Bush
 before
him in continuing efforts to change the government and put in place a
U.S.-friendly oligarch government.

They
came closest in
 2002
when a military coup removed Chavez.
 The
Commander-in-Chief of the Venezuelan military announced Chavez had
resigned and 
Pedro
Carmona
,
of the Venezuelan Chamber of Commerce, became interim president.
Carmona dissolved the National Assembly and Supreme Court and
declared the Constitution void. The people surrounded the
presidential palace and seized television stations, Carmona resigned
and fled to Colombia. Within 47 hours, civilians and the military
restored Chavez to the presidency. 
The
coup was a turning point
 that
strengthened the Bolivarian Revolution, showed people could defeat a
coup and exposed the US and oligarchs.

U.S.
Regime Change Tactics Have Failed In Venezuela

The
U.S. and oligarchs continue their efforts to reverse the Bolivarian
Revolution. The United States has a long history of regime change
around the world and has tried all of its regime change tools in
Venezuela. So far they have failed.

Economic
War

Destroying
the Venezuelan economy has been an ongoing campaign by the US and
oligarchs. It is 
reminiscent
of the US coup in Chile 
which
ended the presidency of Salvador Allende. To create the environment
for the Chilean coup, President Nixon ordered the CIA to “make
the economy scream.”

Henry
Kissinger devised the coup noting a billion dollars of investment
were at stake. He also feared the “the insidious model effect” of
the example of Chile leading to other countries breaking from the
United States and capitalism. Kissinger’s top deputy at the
National Security Council, Viron Vaky, opposed the coup saying,
“What we propose is patently a violation of our own principles and
policy tenets .… If these principles have any meaning, we normally
depart from them only to meet the gravest threat … our survival.”

These
objections hold true regarding recent US coups, including in
Venezuela and Honduras, Ukraine and Brazil, among others. Allende
died in the coup and 
wrote
his last words to the people of Chile
,
especially the workers, “Long live the people! Long live the
workers!” He was replaced by Augusto Pinochet, 
a
brutal and violent dictator
.

For
decades the 
US
has been fighting an economic war
,
“making the economy scream,” in Venezuela.

Wealthy
Venezuelans have been conducting economic sabotage aided by the US
with sanctions and other tactics. This includes 
hoarding
food, supplies and other necessities
 in
warehouses or in Colombia while Venezuelan markets are bare. The
scarcity is used to fuel protests, e.g. “The March of the Empty
Pots,” a carbon copy of marches in Chile before the September 11,
1973 coup. Economic warfare has escalated 
through
Obama
 and under
Trump
,
with Tillerson now urging economic sanctions on oil.

President
Maduro recognized the economic hardship but also said 
sanctions
open up the opportunity for a new era of independence
 and
“begins the stage of post-domination by the United States, with
Venezuela again at the center of this struggle for dignity and
liberation.” The second-in-command of the Socialist Party, 
Diosdado
Cabello, said,
 “[if
they] apply sanctions, we will apply elections.”

Opposition
Protests

Another
common US regime change tool is supporting opposition protests.
The 
Trump
administration renewed regime change operations
 in
Venezuela and the anti-Maduro protests, which began under Obama, grew
more violent. The opposition protests included barricades,
snipers and murders as well as widespread injuries. When police
arrested those using violence, the US claimed Venezuela opposed free
speech and protests.

The
opposition tried to use the crack down against violence to achieve
the U.S. tactic of  dividing the military. The 
U.S.
and western media ignored opposition violence
 and
blamed the Venezuelan government instead. Violence became so extreme
it looked like the 
opposition
was pushing Venezuela into a Syrian-type civil war
.
Instead, opposition violence backfired on them.

Violent
protests are part of U.S. regime change repertoire. This was
demonstrated in the 
U.S.
coup in Ukraine
,
where the U.S. spent $5 billion to organize government opposition
including 
U.S.
and EU funding violent protesters
.
This tactic was used in early US coups like the 
1953
Iran coup
 of
Prime Minister Mossadegh. 
The
U.S. has admitted
 organizing
this 
coup
that ended Iran’s brief experience with democracy
.
Like Venezuela, a key reason for the Iran coup was control of the
nation’s oil.

Funding
Opposition

There
has been 
massive
U.S. investment in creating opposition to the Venezuelan
government
.
Tens of millions of dollars have been openly spent through USAID, the
National Endowment for Democracy and other related US regime change
agencies. It is unknown how much the CIA has spent from its secret
budget, but the 
CIA
has also been involved in Venezuela.
 Current
CIA director, Mike 
Pompeo,
said

he is “hopeful there can be a transition in Venezuela.”

The United
States has also educated leaders of opposition movements
,
e.g. 
Leopoldo
López
 was
educated at private schools in the US, including the CIA-associated
Kenyon College. He was groomed at the Harvard Kennedy School of
Government and made repeated visits to the regime change agency, the
National Republican Institute.

Elections

While
the US calls Venezuela a dictatorship, it is in fact a strong
democracy with an excellent voting system. Election observers monitor
every election.

In
2016, the economic crisis led to the opposition winning a majority in
the National Assembly. One of their first acts was to 
pass
an amnesty law
.
The law described 17 years of crimes including violent felonies and
terrorism committed by the opposition. It was an admission of crimes
back to the 2002 coup and through 2016. The law demonstrated violent
treason against Venezuela. One month later, the Supreme Court of
Venezuela 
ruled
the amnesty law was unconstitutional
.
U.S. media, regime change advocates and anti-Venezuela human rights
groups 
attacked
the Supreme Court decision
,
showing their alliance with the admitted criminals.

Years
of violent protests and regime change attempts, and then admitting
their crimes in an amnesty bill, have caused those opposed to the
Bolivarian Revolution to lose power and become unpopular.  In
three recent elections Maduro’s party 
won
regional, 
 local and
the 
Constituent
Assembly
 elections.

The
electoral commission announced the 
presidential
election will be held on April 22
.
Maduro will run for re-election with the United Socialist Party.
Opposition leaders such as Henry Ramos and Henri Falcon have
expressed interest in running, but the 
opposition
has not decided whether to participate
Henrique
Capriles, who narrowly lost to Maduro in the last election, was
banned from running for office

because of irregularities in his campaign, including taking foreign
donations. 
Capriles has
been a leader of the violent protests. When his ban was announced he
called for protests to remove Maduro from office. Also banned
was 
Leopoldo
Lopez
,
another leader of the violent protests who is under house
arrest 
serving
a thirteen year sentence for inciting violence
.

Now,
the United States says it will not recognize the presidential
election and urges a military coup. For two years, the opposition
demanded presidential elections, but now it is unclear whether they
will participate. They know they are unpopular and Maduro is likely
to be re-elected.

Is
War Against Venezuela Coming?

A
military coup faces challenges in Venezuela as the people, including
the military, are well educated about US imperialism. Tillerson
openly urging a military coup makes it more difficult.

The
government and opposition recently negotiated a peace settlement
entitled “Democratic Coexistence Agreement for Venezuela.”
They 
agreed
on all of the issues
 including
ending economic sanctions, scheduling elections and more. 
They
agreed on the date of the next presidential election.
 It
was originally planned for March, but in a concession to the
opposition, it was  rescheduled for the end of April. 
Maduro
signed the agreement
 even
though the 
opposition
did not attend
 the
signing ceremony. They backed out after Colombian President Santos,
who was meeting with Secretary Tillerson, called and told them not to
sign. 
Maduro
will now make the agreement a public issue
 by
allowing the people of Venezuela to sign it.

Not
recognizing elections and urging a military coup are bad enough, but
more disconcerting is that 
Admiral
Kurt Tidd, head of Southcom, held a closed door meeting in
Colombia
 after
Tillerson’s visit. The topic was “regional destabilization” and
Venezuela was a focus.

A
military attack on Venezuela from its Colombian and Brazilian borders
is not far fetched. In January, 
the
NY Times asked
,
“Should the US military invade Venezuela?” President 
Trump
said the US is considering US military force
 against
Venezuela. His chief of staff, John Kelly, was formerly the general
in charge of Southcom. 
Tidd
has claimed the crisis
,
created in large part by the economic war against Venezuela, requires
military action for humanitarian reasons.

War
preparations are already underway
 in
Colombia, which plays the role of Israel for the US in Latin America.
The coup government in Brazil, 
increased
its military budget 36 percent
,
and participated in 
Operation:
America United
,
the largest joint military exercise in Latin American history. It
was 
one
of four military exercises by the US
 with
Brazil, Colombia and Peru
 in
Latin America in 2017. The US 
Congress
ordered the Pentagon to develop military contingencies
 for
Venezuela in the 2017 National Defense Authorization Act.

While
there is 
opposition
to US military bases
James
Patrick Jordan explains, on our radio show,
 the
US has military bases in Colombia and the Caribbean and military
agreements with countries in the region; and therefore, Venezuela is
already surrounded.

The
United States is targeting Venezuela because the Bolivarian
Revolution provides an example against U.S. imperialism. An
invasion of Venezuela will become another war-quagmire that kills
innocent Venezuelans, U.S. soldiers and others over control of oil.
People in the United States who support the self-determination of
countries should show solidarity with Venezuelans, expose the U.S.
agenda and publicly denounce regime change. We need to educate people
about what is really happening in Venezuela to overcome the false
media coverage.

Kevin
Zeese and Margaret Flowers co-direct 
Popular
Resistance
.
[This article originally appeared
at 
https://popularresistance.org and
is republished with authors’ permission.]

By Kevin
Zeese and Margaret Flowers
 /
Republished with permission / 
Consortium
News
 / Report
a typo

==================================

Ter herinneren aan de enorme agressie van de VS: ‘VS buitenlandbeleid sinds WOII: een lange lijst van staatsgrepen en oorlogen……….‘ en:  ‘List of wars involving the United States

Zie ook:

Halliburton en Chevron hebben groot belang bij ‘regime change’ in Venezuela

Mike Pence (vicepresident VS) gaf Guaidó, de door de VS gewenste leider, groen licht voor de coup in Venezuela

VS coup tegen Maduro in volle gang……..

VS weer op oorlogspad in Latijns-Amerika: Venezuela het volgende slachtoffer…….

Als de VS stopt met spelen van ‘politieagent’ en het vernielen van de wereld, zullen de slechte krachten winnen……

VS zet Latijns-Amerikaanse landen tegen elkaar op en is bezig met voorbereiding invasie Venezuela

Trump wilde naast de economische oorlogsvoering tegen Venezuela dat land daadwerkelijk militair aanvallen……

Venezolaanse regionale verkiezingen gehekeld door westen, terwijl internationale waarnemers deze als eerlijk beoordeelden……….

Venezuela: ‘studentenprotest’ wordt uitgevoerd door ingehuurde troepen………‘ 

Venezuela: Target of Economic Warfare

Venezuela moet en zal ‘verlost’ worden van Maduro, met ‘oh wonder’ een dikke rol van de VS en de reguliere westerse media

Venezolaanse regering treedt terecht op tegen de uiterst gewelddadige oppositie!!


Venezuela ontwricht, wat de reguliere media u niet vertellen……..

VS steunt rechtse coalitie (MUD) in Venezuela………

Venezuela’s US-Backed Opposition Turns Up The Violence Following Assembly Vote

10 Things You Need to Know About the Terrorist Attack in Venezuela

Venezuelans in the Streets to Support Constituent Assembly

What Mainstream Media Got Wrong About Venezuela’s Constituent Assembly Vote‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

The Left and Venezuela‘ (met mogelijkheid tot directe vertaling)

Rondje Venezuela schoppen op Radio1………

Karabulut (SP) blij dat ze Maduro eindelijk ook kan schoppen………

EU neemt uiterst hypocriet sancties tegen de Venezolaanse regering Maduro………

Abby Martin Busts Open Myths on Venezuela’s Food Crisis: ‘Shelves Fully Stocked’‘ (zie ook de video in dat artikel!)

Venezuela: de anti-propaganda van John Oliver (en het grootste deel westerse massamedia) feilloos doorgeprikt