Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

MI6,
de Britse geheime dienst doet er alles aan om te voorkomen dat Trump
geheime documenten vrijgeeft, documenten verkregen via een FBI ‘app’
(waarmee één van Trumps campagne adviseurs werd ‘afgeluisterd en afgekeken’)……
MI6 stelt dat elke openbaarmaking het verder vergaren van
inlichtingen zal ondermijnen….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! Tja, een andere reactie was dan ook niet te verwachten van dit gespuis.

Trumps
bondgenoten eisen terecht openbaarmaking en stellen dat
Groot-Brittannië ‘iets’ te verbergen heeft met het pleidooi de
documenten niet vrij te geven. Een hoge beambte van de VS
inlichtingendiensten stelt dat MI6 terecht bezorgd is, mochten
bronnen worden geopenbaard als geheime delen van het afluisteren (en
ik neem aan door meekijken op computers) worden vrijgegeven…..

Aanvankelijk eiste ook Trump openbaarmaking, maar de geheime diensten hebben hem weten om te praten……..

MI6
is vooral bezorgd over de link met Steele, de voormalige MI6 agent
die één van de hoofdrolspelers is in het ‘Russiagate’ sprookje, met het ‘Steele dossier’*,
dat al volkomen is doorgeprikt als flauwe kul…..

Eén
ding is zeker, al stelt Tyler Durden, schrijver van het hieronder
opgenomen artikel dat op Zero Hedge werd gepubliceerd, het een stuk
voorzichtiger: Groot-Brittannië heeft zich op grote schaal bemoeit
met de presidentsverkiezingen in 2016, dit in samenwerking met de
Obama administratie…… Dat laatste blijkt wel uit het feit dat één
van de andere hoofdrolspelers, ene Halper in totaal 1 miljoen dollar
ontving van het Pentagon onder die administratie, waarvan
400.000 dollar tijdens de laatste maanden voor (en tijdens) de
presidentsverkiezingen van 2016……

Kortom
mocht je nog steeds zijn overtuigd van Russiagate, waarvoor al zoveel
bewijs is geleverd dat het om een ‘hoax’ gaat, wordt het nu toch echt
de hoogste tijd dat je gaat spreken over Britaingate i.p.v.
Russiagate!! Uiteraard zullen de westerse reguliere media en het
grootste deel van de politici blijven volhouden dat Rusland de grote
schuldige is…… Ach ja, men is dan ook uit op oorlog met Rusland,
goed voor de VS, de NAVO en het militair-industrieel complex, maar
niet voor de wereldbevolking……. (laten we hopen dat het bij een
Koude Oorlog 2.0 blijft, maar alle machinaties van de VS en de NAVO lijken te wijzen op
een ‘warme oorlog’ met Rusland [en China], ofwel WOIII…..)

MI6
Scrambling To Stop Trump From Releasing Classified Docs In Russia
Probe

by Tyler
Durden

Sun,
11/25/2018 – 08:30

The
UK’s Secret Intelligence Service, otherwise known as MI6, has been
scrambling to prevent President Trump from publishing classified
materials linked to the Russian election meddling investigation,
according to 
The Telegraph, stating
that any disclosure would “undermine intelligence gathering if
he releases pages of an FBI application to wiretap one of his former
campaign advisers.” 

Trump’s
allies, however, 
are
fighting back
 –
demanding transparency and suggesting that the UK wouldn’t want the
documents withheld unless it had something to hide. 

The
Telegraph has talked to more than a dozen UK and US officials,
including in American intelligence, who have revealed details about
the row. 

British
spy chiefs have “genuine concern” about sources being exposed if
classified parts of the wiretap request were made public, according
to figures familiar with discussions.

It
boils down to the exposure of people
”,
said one US intelligence official, adding: “
We
don’t want to reveal sources and methods
.”
US intelligence shares the concerns of the UK. 

Another
said Britain feared setting a dangerous “precedent” which could
make people less likely to share information, knowing that it could
one day become public. –
The Telegraph

The Telegraph adds
that the UK’s dispute with the Trump administration is so politically
sensitive that staff within the British Embassy in D.C. haver been
barred from discussing it with journalists. Theresa May has also
“been kept at arms-length and is understood to have not raised
the issue directly with the US president.” 

In
September
,
we reported that the British government “expressed grave
concerns” over the material in question after 
President
Trump issued an order to the DOJ to release a wide swath of
materials
,
“immediately” and “without redaction.” 

Trump walked
that order back
 days
later 
after
the UK begged him not to release them

Mr
Trump wants to declassify 21 pages from one of the applications. He
announced the move in September, then backtracked, then this month
said he was “very seriously” considering it again. Both
Britain and Australia are understood to be opposing the move. 

Memos
detailing alleged ties between Mr Trump and Russia compiled
by 
Christopher
Steele, a former MI6 officer
,
were cited in the application, which could explain some of the
British concern. –
The Telegraph

Donald J. Trump


@realDonaldTrump

I met with the DOJ concerning the declassification of various UNREDACTED documents. They agreed to release them but stated that so doing may have a perceived negative impact on the Russia probe. Also, key Allies’ called to ask not to release. Therefore, the Inspector General…..


57.1K

3:35 PM – Sep 21, 2018

Twitter Ads info and privacy


25.2K people are talking about this

Twitter Ads info and privacy

Donald J. Trump


@realDonaldTrump

….has been asked to review these documents on an expedited basis. I believe he will move quickly on this (and hopefully other things which he is looking at). In the end I can always declassify if it proves necessary. Speed is very important to me – and everyone!


67.7K

3:41 PM – Sep 21, 2018

The New
York Times
 reported
at the time that the UK’s concern was over
material which 
includes
direct references to conversations between American law enforcement
officials and Christopher Steele
,” the
former MI6 agent who compiled the infamous “Steele Dossier.”
The UK’s objection, according to former US and British officials, was
over revealing Steele’s identity in an official document, “regardless
of whether he had been named in press reports.” 

We
noted in September, however, that Steele’s name was contained
within the 
Nunes
Memo
 – the
House Intelligence Committee’s majority opinion in the Trump-Russia
case.

Steele
also had 
extensive
contacts
 with
DOJ official Bruce Ohr and his wife Nellie
,
who – along with Steele – was paid by opposition research firm Fusion
GPS in the anti-Trump campaign. Trump called for the declassification
of FBI notes of interviews with Ohr, which would ostensibly reveal
more about his relationship with Steele. Ohr was demoted twice within
the Department of Justice for 
lying
about his contacts
 with
Fusion GPS. 

Perhaps
the Brits are also concerned since much of the espionage performed on
the Trump campaign was 
conducted on
UK soil throughout 2016
.
Recall that Trump aid George Papadopoulos was 
lured
to London
 in
March, 2016, where Maltese professor Joseph Mifsud fed him the rumor
that Russia had dirt on Hillary Clinton. It was later 
at
a London bar
 that
Papadopoulos would drunkenly pass the rumor to Australian diplomat
Alexander Downer (who Strzok flew to London to meet with). 

Also
recall that CIA/FBI “informant” (spy) Stefan Halper met
with both Carter Page 
and
Papadopoulos
 in
London. 

Halper,
a veteran of four Republican administrations, reached out to Trump
aide George Papadopoulos in September 2016 with an offer to fly to
London to write an academic paper on energy exploration in the
Mediterranean Sea.

Papadopoulos
accepted a flight to London and a $3,000 honorarium.
 He
claims that during a meeting in London, Halper asked him whether he
knew anything about Russian hacking of Democrats’ emails.

Papadopoulos
had other contacts on British soil that he now believes were part of
a government-sanctioned surveillance operation. –
Daily
Caller

In
total, Halper received 
over
$1 million from the Obama Pentagon
 for
“research,” over $400,000 of which was granted before and
during the 2016 election season.

Papadopoulos,
who was sentenced to 14 days in prison for lying about his
conversations with a shadowy Maltese professor and self-professed
member of the 
Clinton
Foundation
, has
publicly claimed he was targeted by UK spies, and told 
The
Telegraph
 that
he demands transparency. Trump’s allies in Washington, meanwhile,
have suggested that the facts laid out before us mean that the
ongoing Russia investigation 
was
invalid from the start

In
short, it’s understandable that the UK would prefer to hide
their involvement in the “witch hunt” of Donald Trump
since much of the counterintelligence investigation was
conducted on UK soil. And if the Brits had knowledge of the
operation, it will bolster claims that they meddled in the
2016 US election by assisting what appears to have been a 
set-up
from the start
.

Steele’s
ham-handed dossier is a mere embarrassment, as virtually none of the
claims asserted by the former MI6 agent have been proven true. 

Steele,
a former MI6 agent, is the author of the infamous and unverified
anti-Trump dossier. He worked as a confidential human source for the
FBI for years before the relationship was severed just before the
election because of Steele’s unauthorized contacts with the press.

He
shared results of his investigation into Trump’s links to Russia
with the FBI beginning in early July 2016.

The
FBI relied heavily on the unverified Steele dossier to fill out
applications for four FISA warrants against Page. Page has denied the
dossier’s claims, which include that he was the Trump campaign’s
back channel to the Kremlin. –
Daily
Caller

That
said, Steele hasn’t worked for the British government since 2009, so
for their excuse focusing on the former MI6 agent while ignoring the
multitude of events which occurred on UK soil, is curious. 

Tag:
Politics

=================================

* Zie: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump‘ en: Hillary Clinton moet op de hoogte zijn geweest van aankoop Steele dossier over Trump……..

Zie ook:

Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots

Der Spiegel, groot bestrijder van ‘fake news’ bracht zelf jarenlang dit soort ‘nieuws’

Russiagate: de westerse massamedia gebruiken propaganda om het volk te manipuleren, precies waar ze Rusland van beschuldigen

BBC: Rusland ‘misbruikt humor’ om Russiagate te ontkrachten….. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Uitgelekte telefoongesprekken tussen Trump en Putin bewijzen dat ‘Russiagaters gelijk hebben……’

WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!

Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax

Obama gaf toe dat de DNC e-mails expres door de DNC werden gelekt naar Wikileaks….!!!!

De Israëlische manipulatie van de VS presidentsverkiezingen, gaat veel verder dan wat men Rusland in de schoenen schuift…..

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..

‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’


Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen


Britse en VS manipulaties van verkiezingen en stimulatie van conflicten middels psychologische oorlogsvoering‘ (voor VS manipulaties van verkiezingen elders, liggen er ‘metersdikke’ dossiers, o.a. in te zien op WikiLeaks)


FBI Director Comey Leaked Trump Memos Containing Classified Information


Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election


Murray, ex-ambassadeur van GB: de Russen hebben de VS verkiezingen niet gemanipuleerd

‘Russische manipulaties uitgevoerd’ door later vermoord staflid Clintons campagneteam Seth Rich……… AIVD en MIVD moeten hiervan weten!!

‘Russiagate’: Intel-raport over Russische bemoeienis met verkiezingen opgebouwd met leugens en is politiek gemotiveerd, aldus Matlock, voormalig VS ambassadeur in Moskou

Mocking Trump Doesn’t Prove Russia’s Guilt

CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..

WikiLeaks: Seth Rich Leaked Clinton Emails, Not Russia

Hillary Clinton en haar oorlog tegen de waarheid…….. Ofwel een potje Rusland en Assange schoppen!

VS ‘democratie’ aan het werk, een onthutsende en uitermate humoristische video!

Flashback: Clinton Allies Met With Ukrainian Govt Officials to Dig up Dirt on Trump During 2016 Election

Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..

Campagne Clinton, smeriger dan gedacht…………‘ (met daarin daarin opgenomen de volgende twee artikelen: ‘Donna Brazile Bombshell: ‘Proof’ Hillary ‘Rigged’ Primary Against Bernie‘ en ‘Democrats in Denial After Donna Brazile Says Primary Was Rigged for Hillary‘)

Clinton te kakken gezet: Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!

RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

Alarm Code Geel: Lara Rense (NOS) voedt Rusland-haat

‘Russiagate’ een nieuwe ongelooflijke aanklacht van de Democraten…….

VS demoniseert Russiagate critici als Jill Stein…..

De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

=========================================

En terzijde:

Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

Trump (Republikeinen) wint de midterm verkiezingen, alsook de Democraten, het verschil voor mensen elders in de wereld, die onder VS terreur moeten leven, is nul komma nada…….

The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media

The Lie of the 21st Century: How Mainstream Media “Fake News” Led to the U.S. Invasion of Iraq

Mediaorgaan Sinclair dwingt ‘TV ankers’ propaganda op te lezen (Sinclair bedient rond de 70% van de VS bevolking van ‘lokaal nieuws’)

Ex-CIA agent legt uit hoe de VS schaduwregering en deep state werken, ofwel de machinaties achter de schermen……

New York Times: eerste Israëlische inval in Gazastrook sinds 2014 >> fake news!

Noord-Koreaans ‘bedrog met nucleaire deal’ is fake news o.a. gebracht door de New York Times

‘Fake News’ misbruikt door dictaturen en de reguliere (massa-) media

Twitter weert waarheid: Paul Craig Roberts in de ban, Roberts >> de grote criticus van de illegale oorlogen die de VS voert

FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..

Er is al veel geschreven (althans in de alternatieve media) over de ware schuldigen achter Russiagate, met bewijzen werd en wordt aangetoond dat de geheime diensten FBI, CIA en NSA de ware schuldigen zijn achter Russiagate, waar overigens het campagneteam van hare kwaadaardigheid Clinton, aanstichter en mededader is…….

Gisteren op het blog van Stan van Houcke een artikel geschreven door Ray McGovern (ex-CIA) en gepubliceerd op de site van schrijver/journalist Paul Craig Roberts, die het overnam van Consortium News (kan je het nog volgen?). McGovern legt op een gedegen manier uit dat de FBI de ware grote dader is achter Russiagate.

Niet voor niets zegt nu zelfs de Wall Street Journal dat er een punt moet worden gezegd achter het Russiagate verhaal……. ha! Ha! Ha! Eerst liepen de persen van de Wall Street Journal zo hard op deze leugen dat ze bij wijze van spreken bijna vastliepen…….. Waar nu blijkt dat het Clinton campagneteam en de geheime diensten samen hebben gewerkt om te voorkomen dat Trump in het Witte Huis zou komen, wil deze bijna grootste krant van de VS dus een punt achter het enorme leugenverhaal dat Russiagate is………

Nogmaals toont een massamediaorgaan aan ‘fake news’ (of: nepnieuws) te hebben gebracht en daar het volk maandenlang over te hebben voorgelogen……

Lezen mensen, een geweldig stuk over dombo’s Strzak en Page, die dachten in het geheim te kunnen communiceren, maar van wie onlangs een eerste deel van hun lange correspondentie werd vrijgegeven en waardoor ten overvloede de FBI nog eens kan worden aangewezen als spin in het Russiagate web…….

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate


By Ray McGovern

January 15, 2018 Paul Craig Roberts.

As I have reported from the beginning, Russiagate is an orchestrated hoax by the security agencies for the purpose of preventing Trump from normalizing relations with Russia and, if necessary, for removing him from office. Russiagate is an act of treason by the security agencies. Those responsible must be arrested, prosecuted, and convicted. — PCR


“After months of breathless searching for ‘evidence’ of Russian-Trump collusion designed to put Trump in the White House, what now exists is actual evidence that senior officials of the Obama administration colluded to keep Trump out of the White House.” — Ray McGovern



Special Report: In the Watergate era, liberals warned about U.S. intelligence agencies manipulating U.S. politics, but now Trump-hatred has blinded many of them to this danger becoming real, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern notes. 



January 12, 2017, Information Clearing House

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/48572.htm

The FBI Hand Behind Russia-gate


By Ray McGovern

Russia-gate is becoming FBI-gate, thanks to the official release of unguarded text messages between loose-lipped FBI counterintelligence official Peter Strzok and his garrulous girlfriend, FBI lawyer Lisa Page. (Ten illustrative texts from their exchange appear at the end of this article.)

Despite his former job as chief of the FBI’s counterintelligence section, Strzok had the naive notion that texting on FBI phones could not be traced. Strzok must have slept through “Security 101.” Or perhaps he was busy texting during that class. Girlfriend Page cannot be happy at being misled by his assurance that using office phones would be a secure way to conduct their affair(s).

It would have been unfortunate enough for Strzok and Page to have their adolescent-sounding texts merely exposed, revealing the reckless abandon of star-crossed lovers hiding (they thought) secrets from cuckolded spouses, office colleagues, and the rest of us. However, for the never-Trump plotters in the FBI, the official release of just a fraction (375) of almost 10,000 messages does incalculably more damage than that.

We suddenly have documentary proof that key elements of the U.S. intelligence community were trying to short-circuit the U.S. democratic process. And that puts in a new and dark context the year-long promotion of Russia-gate. It now appears that it was not the Russians trying to rig the outcome of the U.S. election, but leading officials of the U.S. intelligence community, shadowy characters sometimes called the Deep State.

More of the Strzok-Page texting dialogue is expected to be released. And the Department of Justice Inspector General reportedly has additional damaging texts from others on the team that Special Counsel Robert Mueller selected to help him investigate Russia-gate.

Besides forcing the removal of Strzok and Page, the text exposures also sounded the death knell for the career of FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, in whose office some of the plotting took place and who has already announced his plans to retire soon.

But the main casualty is the FBI’s 18-month campaign to sabotage candidate-and-now-President Donald Trump by using the Obama administration’s Russia-gate intelligence “assessment,” electronic surveillance of dubious legality, and a salacious dossier that could never pass the smell test, while at the same time using equally dubious techniques to immunize Hillary Clinton and her closest advisers from crimes that include lying to the FBI and endangering secrets.

Ironically, the Strzok-Page texts provide something that the Russia-gate investigation has been sorely lacking: first-hand evidence of both corrupt intent and action. After months of breathless searching for “evidence” of Russian-Trump collusion designed to put Trump in the White House, what now exists is actual evidence that senior officials of the Obama administration colluded to keep Trump out of the White House – proof of what old-time gumshoes used to call “means, motive and opportunity.”

Even more unfortunately for Russia-gate enthusiasts, the FBI lovers’ correspondence provides factual evidence exposing much of the made-up “Resistance” narrative – the contrived storyline that The New York Times and much of the rest of the U.S. mainstream media deemed fit to print with little skepticism and few if any caveats, a scenario about brilliantly devious Russians that not only lacks actual evidence – relying on unverified hearsay and rumor – but doesn’t make sense on its face.

The Russia-gate narrative always hinged on the preposterous notion that Russian President Vladimir

Putin foresaw years ago what no American political analyst considered even possible, the political ascendancy of Donald Trump. According to the narrative, the fortune-telling Putin then risked creating even worse tensions with a nuclear-armed America that would – by all odds – have been led by a vengeful President Hillary Clinton.

Besides this wildly improbable storyline, there were flat denials from WikiLeaks, which distributed the supposedly “hacked” Democratic emails, that the information came from Russia – and there was the curious inability of the National Security Agency to use its immense powers to supply any technical evidence to support the Russia-hack scenario.

The Trump Shock

But the shock of Trump’s election and the decision of many never-Trumpers to cast their lot with the Resistance led to a situation in which any prudent skepticism or demand for evidence was swept aside.

So, on Jan. 6, 2017, President Obama’s Director of National Intelligence James Clapper released an evidence-free report that he said was compiled by “hand-picked” analysts from the CIA, FBI and NSA, offering an “assessment” that Russia and President Putin were behind the release of the Democratic emails in a plot to help Trump win the presidency.

Despite the extraordinary gravity of the charge, even New York Times correspondent Scott Shane noted that proof was lacking. He wrote at the time: “What is missing from the [the Jan. 6] public report is what many Americans most eagerly anticipated: hard evidence to back up the agencies’ claims that the Russian government engineered the election attack. … Instead, the message from the agencies essentially amounts to ‘trust us.’”

But the “assessment” served a useful purpose for the never-Trumpers: it applied an official imprimatur on the case for delegitimizing Trump’s election and even raised the long-shot hope that the Electoral College might reverse the outcome and possibly install a compromise candidate, such as former Secretary of State Colin Powell, in the White House. Though the Powell ploy fizzled, the hope of somehow removing Trump from office continued to bubble, fueled by the growing hysteria around Russia-gate.

Virtually all skepticism about the evidence-free “assessment” was banned. For months, the Times and other newspapers of record repeated the lie that all 17 U.S. intelligence agencies had concurred in the conclusion about the Russian “hack.” Even when that falsehood was belatedly acknowledged, the major news outlets just shifted the phrasing slightly to say that U.S. intelligence agencies had reached the Russian “hack” conclusion. Shane’s blunt initial recognition about the lack of proof disappeared from the mainstream media’s approved narrative of Russia-gate.

Doubts about the Russian “hack” or dissident suggestions that what we were witnessing was a “soft coup” were scoffed at by leading media commentators. Other warnings from veteran U.S. intelligence professionals about the weaknesses of the Russia-gate narrative and the danger of letting politicized intelligence overturn a constitutional election were also brushed aside in pursuit of the goal of removing Trump from the White House.

It didn’t even seem to matter when new Russia-gate disclosures conflicted with the original narrative that Putin had somehow set Trump up as a Manchurian candidate. All normal journalistic skepticism was jettisoned. It was as if the Russia-gate advocates started with the conclusion that Trump must go and then made the facts fit into that mold, but anyone who noted the violations of normal investigative procedures was dismissed as a “Trump enabler” or a “Moscow stooge.”

The Text Evidence

But then came the FBI text messages, providing documentary evivdence that key FBI officials involved in the Russia-gate investigation were indeed deeply biased and out to get Trump, adding hard proof to Trump’s longstanding lament that he was the subject of a “witch hunt.”

Justified or not, Trump’s feeling of vindication could hardly be more dangerous — particularly at a time when the most urgent need is to drain some testosterone from the self-styled Stable-Genius-in-Chief and his martinet generals.

On the home front, Trump, his wealthy friends, and like-thinkers in Congress may now feel they have an even wider carte blanche to visit untold misery on the poor, the widow, the stranger and other vulnerable humans. That was always an underlying danger of the Resistance’s strategy to seize on whatever weapons were available – no matter how reckless or unfair – to “get Trump.”

Beyond that, Russia-gate has become so central to the Washington establishment’s storyline that there appears to be no room for second-thoughts or turning back. The momentum is such that some Democrats and the media never-Trumpers can’t stop stoking the smoke of Russia-gate and holding out hope against hope that it will somehow justify Trump’s impeachment.

Yet, the sordid process of using legal/investigative means to settle political scores further compromises the principle of the “rule of law” and integrity of journalism in the eyes of many Americans. After a year of Russia-gate, the “rule of law” and “pursuit of truth” appear to have been reduced to high-falutin’ phrases for political score-setttling, a process besmirched by Republicans in earlier pursuits of Democrats and now appearing to be a bipartisan method for punishing political rivals regardless of the lack of evidence.

Strzok and Page

Peter Strzok (pronounced “struck”) has an interesting pedigree with multiple tasks regarding both Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Trump. As the FBI’s chief of counterespionage during the investigation into then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a personal email server for classified information, Strzok reportedly changed the words “grossly negligent” (which could have triggered legal prosecution) to the far less serious “extremely careless” in FBI Director James Comey’s depiction of Clinton’s actions. This semantic shift cleared the way for Comey to conclude just 20 days before the Democratic National Convention began in July 2016, that “no reasonable prosecutor” would bring charges against Mrs. Clinton.

Then, as Deputy Assistant Director of the Counterintelligence Division, Strzok led the FBI’s investigation into alleged Russian interference in the U.S. election of 2016. It is a safe bet that he took a strong hand in hand-picking the FBI contingent of analysts that joined “hand-picked” counterparts from CIA and NSA in preparing the evidence-free, Jan. 6, 2017 assessment accusing Russian President Vladimir Putin of interfering in the election of 2016. (Although accepted in Establishment groupthink as revealed truth, that poor excuse for analysis reflected the apogee of intelligence politicization — rivaled only by the fraudulent intelligence on “weapons of mass destruction“ in Iraq 15 years ago.)

In June and July 2017 Strzok was the top FBI official working on Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into possible links between the Trump campaign and Russia, but was taken off that job when the Justice Department IG learned of the Strzok-Page text-message exchange and told Mueller.

There is no little irony in the fact that what did in the FBI sweathearts was their visceral disdain for Mr. Trump, their cheerleading-cum-kid-gloves treatment of Mrs. Clinton and her associates, their 1950-ish, James Clapperesque attitude toward Russians as “almost genetically driven” to evil, and their (Strzok/Page) elitist conviction that they know far better what is good for the country than regular American citizens, including those “deplorables” whom Clinton said made up half of Trump’s supporters.

But Strzok/Page had no idea that their hubris, elitism and scheming would be revealed in so tangible a way. Worst of all for them, the very thing that Strzok, in particular, worked so hard to achieve — the sabotaging of Trump and immunization of Mrs. Clinton and her closest advisers is now coming apart at the seams.

Congress: Oversee? or Overlook?

At this point, the $64 question is whether the various congressional oversight committees will remain ensconced in their customarily cozy role as “overlook” committees, or whether they will have the courage to attempt to carry out their Constitutional duty. The latter course would mean confronting a powerful Deep State and its large toolbox of well-practiced retaliatory techniques, including J. Edgar Hoover-style blackmail on steroids, enabled by electronic surveillance of just about everything and everyone. Yes, today’s technology permits blanket collection, and “Collect Everything” has become the motto.

Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-New York, with almost four decades of membership in the House and Senate, openly warned incoming President Trump in January 2017 against criticizing the U.S. intelligence community because U.S. intelligence officials have “six ways from Sunday to get back at you” if you are “dumb” enough to take them on.

Thanks to the almost 10,000 text messages between Strzok and Page, only a small fraction of which were given to Congress four weeks ago, there is now real evidentiary meat on the bones of the suspicions that there indeed was a “deep-state coup” to “correct” the outcome of the 2016 election. We now know that the supposedly apolitical FBI officials had huge political axes to grind. The Strzok-Page exchanges drip with disdain for Trump and those deemed his smelly deplorable supporters. In one text message, Strzok expressed visceral contempt for those working-class Trump voters, writing on Aug. 26, 2016, “Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support. … it’s scary real down here.”

The texts even show Strzok warning of the need for an “insurance policy” to thwart Trump on the off-chance that his poll numbers closed in on those of Mrs. Clinton.

An Aug. 6, 2016 text message, for example, shows Page giving her knight in shining armor strong affirmation: “Maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace [Trump].” That text to Strzok includes a link to a David Brooks column in The New York Times, in which Brooks concludes with the clarion call: “There comes a time when neutrality and laying low become dishonorable. If you’re not in revolt, you’re in cahoots. When this period and your name are mentioned, decades hence, your grandkids will look away in shame.”

Another text message shows that other senior government officials – alarmed at the possibility of a Trump presidency – joined the discussion. In an apparent reference to an August 2016 meeting with FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe, Strzok wrote to Page on Aug. 15, 2016, “I want to believe the path you threw out for consideration in Andy’s office — that there’s no way he [Trump] gets elected — but I’m afraid we can’t take that risk.”  Strzok added, “It’s like an insurance policy in the unlikely event that you die before you’re 40.”

Insurance Policy?

Senate Judiciary Committee chair Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, says he will ask Strzok to explain the “insurance policy” when he calls him to testify. What seems already clear is that the celebrated “Steele Dossier” was part of the “insurance,” as was the evidence-less legend that Russia hacked the DNC’s and Clinton campaign chairman John Podesta’s emails and gave them to WikiLeaks.

If congressional investigators have been paying attention, they already know what former weapons inspector Scott Ritter shared with Veteran intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS) colleagues this week; namely, that Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson, who commissioned the Russia dossier using Democratic Party money, said he reached out to Steele after June 17, just three days before Steele’s first report was published, drawing on seven sources.

“There is a snowball’s chance in hell that this is raw intelligence gathered by Steele; rather he seems to have drawn on a single ‘trusted intermediary’ to gather unsubstantiated rumor already in existence.”

Another VIPS colleague, Phil Giraldi, writing out of his own experience in private sector consulting, added: “The fact that you do not control your sources frequently means that they will feed you what they think you want to hear. Since they are only doing it for money, the more lurid the details the better, as it increases the apparent value of the information. The private security firm in turn, which is also doing it for the money, will pass on the stories and even embroider them to keep the client happy and to encourage him to come back for more. When I read the Steele dossier it looked awfully familiar to me, like the scores of similar reports I had seen which combined bullshit with enough credible information to make the whole product look respectable.”

It is now widely known that the Democrats ponied up the “insurance premiums,” so to speak, for former British intelligence officer Christopher Steele’s “dossier” of lurid — but largely unproven — “intelligence” on Trump and the Russians. If, as many have concluded, the   dossier was used to help justify a FISA warrant to snoop on the Trump campaign, those involved will be in deep kimchi, if congressional overseers do their job.

How, you might ask, could Strzok and associates undertake these extra-legal steps with such blithe disregard for the possible consequences should they be caught? The answer is easy; Mrs. Clinton was a shoo-in, remember? This was just extra insurance with no expectation of any “death benefit” ever coming into play — save for Trump’s electoral demise in November 2016. The attitude seemed to be that, if abuse of the FISA law should eventually be discovered — there would be little interest in a serious investigation by the editors of The New York Times and other anti-Trump publications and whatever troubles remained could be handled by President Hillary Clinton.

Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-South Carolina, who chairs the Judiciary Subcommittee of Judiciary on Crime and Terrorism, joined Sen. Grassley in signing the letter referring Christopher Steele to the Justice Department to investigate what appear to be false statements about the dossier. In signing, Graham noted the “many stop signs the Department of Justice ignored in its use of the dossier.” The signature of committee ranking member Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-California, however, was missing — an early sign that a highly partisan battle royale is in the offing.  On Tuesday, Feinstein unilaterally released a voluminous transcript of Glenn Simpson’s earlier testimony and, as though on cue, Establishment pundits portrayed Steele as a good source and Fusion GPS’s Glenn Simpson as a victim.

The Donnybrook is now underway; the outcome uncertain.

Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, a publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in inner-city Washington.  He was an Army and CIA intelligence analyst for 30 years; prepared and briefed the President’s Daily Brief for Nixon, Ford, and Reagan; and is co-founder of Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS).

+++++++++++++

Sample text messages between Peter Strzok and Lisa Page, released to Congress and the media on December 13, 2016

++++++++++++++

03/04/2016

Strzok – God Hillary should win. 100,000,000-0.

Page – I know

++++++++++++

04/02/2016

Page – So look, you say we text on that phone when we talk about Hillary because it can’t be traced, you were just venting, bc you feel bad that you’re gone so much but that can’t be helped right now.

++++++++++

07/08/2016

Strzok – And meanwhile, we have Black Lives Matter protestors, right now, chanting “no justice no peace” around DoJ and the White House…

Page – That’s awful.

+++++++++

07/14/2016

Page – Have you read this? It’s really frightening. For Whites Sensing Decline, Donald Trump Unleashes Words of Resistance http://NYTI/ms/29WCu5!

Strzok – I have not. But I think it’s clear he’s capturing all the white, poor voters who the mainstream republicans abandoned in all but name in the quest for the almighty $$$

Page – Yeah, it’s not good.

Strzok – Poll Finds Emails Weighing on Hillary Clinton, Now Tied With Donald Trump http://nyti.ms/29RV5gf

Page – It is

+++++++++++++

07/26/2016

Strzok – And hey. Congrats on a woman nominated for President in a major party! About damn time! Many many more returns of the day!!

Page – That’s cute. Thanks

++++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – Jesus. You should read this. And Trump should go f himself. Moment in Convention Glare Shakes Up Khans American Life http://nyti.ms/2aHulE0

Strzok – God that’s a great article. Thanks for sharing. And F TRUMP.

++++++++

08/06/2016

Page – And maybe you’re meant to stay where you are because you’re meant to protect the country from that menace. To that end comma, read this:

Page – Trump Enablers Will Finally Have to Take A Stand http://nyti.ms/2aFakry

Strzok – Thanks. It’s absolutely true that we’re both very fortunate. And of course I’ll try and approach it that way. I just know it will be tough at times. I can protect our country at many levels, not sure if that helps

++++++++++++

08/09/2016

Page – He’s not ever going to become president, right? Right?!

Strzok – OMG did you hear what Trump just said?

+++++++++++

08/26/2016

Strzok – Just went to a southern Virginia Walmart. I could SMELL the Trump support…

Page – Yep. Out to lunch with (redacted) We both hate everyone and everything.

Page – Just riffing on the hot mess that is our country.

Strzok – Yeah…it’s scary real down here

+++++++++

10/20/2016

Strzok: I am riled up. Trump is a f***ing idiot, is unable to provide a coherent answer.

Strzok – I CAN’T PULL AWAY, WHAT THE F**K HAPPENED TO OUR COUNTRY (redacted)??!?!

Page– I don’t know. But we’ll get it back. We’re America. We rock.

Strzok– Donald just said “bad hombres”

Strzok– Trump just said what the FBI did is disgraceful.

This article was originally published by Consortium News –

====

Was the DNC/Clinton campaign-funded dossier used to obtain warrants on Trump team from the secret court?

=============================

* Zie: ‘Wall Street Journal wil punt achter Russiagate

Zie ook: ‘WikiLeaks belooft The Guardian 1 miljoen dollar als het haar leugens i.z. Assange en Russiagate kan bewijzen…….

        en: ‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!

        en: ‘Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden

        en ‘Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax

       en: ‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……

       en: ‘Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen

       en: ‘Google, de volgende ‘die advertentieruimte verkocht aan Putin zelf……’ ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Russiagate, of: hoe de media u belazeren met verhalen over Russische bemoeienis met de VS presidentsverkiezingen……..‘ 

       en: Publicly Available Evidence Doesn’t Support Russian Gov Hacking of 2016 Election

       en: ‘Democraten VS kochten informatie over Trump >> Forgetting the ‘Dirty Dossier’ on Trump

       en: ‘Russia Is Trolling the Shit out of Hillary Clinton and the Mainstream Media

       en: ‘Russische ‘hacks’ door deskundigen nogmaals als fake news doorgeprikt >> Intel Vets Challenge ‘Russia Hack’ Evidence

       en: ‘Rusland krijgt alweer de schuld van hacken, nu van oplichters Symantec en Facebook……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘CIA chef Pompeo waarschuwt voor complot van WikiLeaks om de VS op alle mogelijke manieren neer te halen……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’

       en: ‘Rusland zou onafhankelijkheid Californië willen uitlokken met reclame voor borsjt…….

       en: ‘Clinton te kakken gezet: Donna Brazile (Democratische Partij VS) draagt haar boek op aan Seth Rich, het vermoorde lid van DNC die belastende documenten lekte

       en: ‘CIA deed zich voor als het Russische Kaspersky Lab, aldus Wikileaks Vault 8…..‘ (zie ook de andere links onder dat bericht)

       en: ‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 vicepremier): Nederland staat in het vizier van Russische inlichtingendiensten……. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!

       en: ‘Ollongren gesteund door Thomas Boesgaard (AD), ‘Rusland verpakt het nepnieuws gekoppeld aan echt nieuws…..’ Oei!!‘ (ja ook deze D66 plork gaat plat op de bek!)

       en: ‘RT America één van de eerste slachtoffers in een heksenjacht op westerse alternatieve media en nadenkend links……

       en: ‘Rusland heeft niets van doen met manipulaties van de VS presidentsverkiezingen via Facebook, wel maakt Facebook meer kapot dan je lief is…….

       en: ‘‘False flag terror’ bestaat wel degelijk: bekentenissen en feiten over heel smerige zaken……….

        en:  ‘CIA 70 jaar: 70 jaar moorden, martelen, coups plegen, nazi’s beschermen, media manipulatie enz. enz………

       en: ‘CIA en 70 jaar desinformatie in Europese opiniebladen…………

       en: ‘Pompeo (CIA opperhoofd met koperen fluit): heeft alle aanwijzingen dat Rusland de midterm verkiezingen zal manipuleren……

       en: ‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..


       en: De Russiagate samenzweringstheorie dient de machthebbers………

       en: ‘‘Fake News’ hysterie willens en wetens gelanceerd om sociale media tot zwijgen te brengen, Rusland te demoniseren en daarmee de waarheid te verbergen……..

VS waarschuwde regering van Zweden voor Wikileaks in aanloop verkiezingen, Assange ‘moest en zou hangen’, ofwel de zoveelste VS manipulatie van verkiezingen elders……

Mensen er zijn van die berichten die letterlijk bijna ongelofelijk zijn, zo smerig en dat (veelal) op regeringsniveau…..
Sinds het 666 beest Trump in het Witte Huis zit, met een militaire
junta aan het stuur, is het voorgaande uiteraard onzin, het regent
van dit soort berichten met daarin de doortrapte vieze waarheid, zie bijvoorbeeld de documenten op Wikileaks…….

Trouwens ook berichten met vuile handelingen gedaan door Hillary Clinton, zijn regelmatig bijna niet te geloven, ‘zeg
maar’: te zot voor woorden……… Hier het laatste voorbeeld van
dit soort berichten (althans tot rond 19.30 u. gisteravond, je weet maar nooit wat er bijvoorbeeld intussen al is uitgelekt en wat er op dit moment weer uitlekt, waarvan jij en ik nog geen weet hebben…..)……

Gisteren op ZeroHedge zo’n artikel van Tyler Durden: de VS ambassade in Stockholm waarschuwde de regering van Zweden voor Wikileaks in aanloop van de verkiezingen van
19 september 2010 in dat land. Een waarschuwing voor de verkiezingswinst van de
Piratenpartij, een winst die er volgens de VS ambassade aan zat te komen, als Julian Assange nog voor die
verkiezingen de eerder verkregen VS documenten zou openbaren in
Wikileaks………..

Twee weken later werd er in Zweden een
arrestatiebevel uitgevaardigd voor Assange, dit wegens seksueel
wangedrag tegen 2 vrouwen…… Na onderzoek werd het dossier gesloten
wegens het ontbreken van aanwijzingen en bewijzen, m.a.w. Assange werd onschuldig
bevonden…… Daarna werd het onderzoek weer heropend en uiteindelijk
in 2015 finaal beëindigd, daar de aanklacht* ongegrond bleek te
zijn…….

Uiteraard heeft deze aanklacht tegen Assange de Zweedse verkiezingen negatief beïnvloed voor de Piratenpartij, die door velen wordt gezien als een uitvloeisel van o.a. Wikileaks, immers het gros van de mensen denkt: ‘waar rook is moet vuur zijn…….’

De trouwste partner van de grootste
terreurentiteit op aarde, de VS (o.a. bewezen door de officiële VS documenten
op Wikileaks) is Groot-Brittannie, op wier grondgebied Assange
in feite gevangen zit in de Ecuadoraanse ambassade…… Assange
vluchtte die ambassade in, daar hij onschuldig was en er terecht van
overtuigd was, dat GB hem zou uitleveren aan Zweden als hij daar zou worden vastgehouden voor een bedachte verkrachting en deze zou ongegrond blijken voor de rechter, zou Zweden hem daarna op haar beurt uitleveren aan de VS…………

Nadat Zweden alle aanklachten liet
vallen, heeft het smerige geteisem, ofwel de Britse regering onder aanvoering van hare gitzwarte kwaadaardigheid May,
Assange duidelijk gemaakt dat hij bij de eerste stap buiten de
Ecuadoraanse ambassade door de Britse politie gearresteerd zou
worden, uiteraard om hem daarna uit te leveren aan de VS……..

Deze informatie komt uit de laptop van
Anthony Weiner, u weet wel de senator die een selfie had gemaakt met
een ietwat gezwollen knakworst in z’n onderbroek. De vrouw van Wiener, die vanwege een
later seksschandaal met jonge vrouwen van hem scheidde, werkte voor
Hillary Clinton en de rest is geschiedenis (en geschiedenis in wording)……

Kortom de VS
overheid heeft Assange doelbewust ‘geframed’ en het kan bijna niemand
anders zijn dan Hillary Clinton die daar de volledige schuld voor draagt, dit alles om
publicatie in Wikileaks van documenten te voorkomen, die o.a. haar smerige handelen op het gebied van buitenlandpolitiek aan het licht zouden brengen (zij was destijds minister van Buitenlandse Zaken onder Obama)…….
Ofwel de zoveelste VS ‘false flag’ operatie, je weet wel: ‘false flag’ operaties die de zogenaamde
onafhankelijke reguliere (massa-) media in het westen, immer VS, NAVO en regeringsgetrouw, afdoen als complottheorieën……..

Je weet niet half hoe
smerig overheden te werk gaan om hun barbaarse schoftengedrag te
verbergen, de VS is in dit soort gedrag de absolute kampioen……. Lees het volgende ontluisterende maar goed geschreven artikel, met verduidelijkende uitleg van Tyler Durden, zoals gepubliceerd op ZeroHedge:

Weiner
Laptop Doc: Assange Warrant Issued 2 Weeks After Swedish Election
Leaks Warning

Afbeeldingsresultaat voor Weiner Laptop Doc: Assange Warrant Issued 2 Weeks After Swedish Election Leaks Warning

by Tyler
Durden

Sun,
12/31/2017 – 09:48

confidential document found
on Anthony Weiner’s laptop reveals that the United States
Embassy in Stockholm, Sweden expressed concerns in 2010 that
WikiLeaks would release classified US documents related to
Sweden ahead of the September 19 Swedish election, tipping
the vote towards the Pirate Party. The subject of the cable
reads “
Wikileaks:
The Pirate Party’s White Horse Into Sweden’s Parliament?
” 

On June
29, 2010 
a
US diplomat met with three members of the Pirate Party – which is
described in the cable as a “mixture between communism and
libertarianism,” yet whose members are “well-salaried
professionals, independent  from the party for income.” Two
of the “pirates,” according to the report, were active in
the 
“youth
branch of the conservative party currently leading government
.” 

The
Embassy cable notes the “
grim
electoral outlook for Pirates

– as confirmed by a Pirate party member interviewed by the US
diplomat, 
“Unless
WikiLeaks Saves the Day.” 

Unless
WikiLeaks Saves the Day

Two
weeks after the cable was sent, an arrest warrant was issued for
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange
 on
sexual assault allegations – which was dropped, then re-issued, then
revoked again by Swedish authorities in August 2015 when they dropped
their case against him.

sdf

Cable
found on Anthony Weiner’s Laptop, 
obtained
via Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit

The
emergence of this 
confidential document
(
found
on Anthony Weiner’s laptop and sent while his wife, Huma Abedin, was
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s Deputy Chief of Staff
),
is disturbing – as it potentially 
implicates
the Obama administration in a conspiracy to silence Julian Assange
while Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State – 
not
to mention that it could be the smoking gun in 
yet
another clear case of mishandled information
 found
on imprisoned sexual deviant Anthony Weiner’s laptop the
FBI’s 
Peter
Strzok
 and
crew
 must
have somehow overlooked. 

A
brief timeline of events:
 

On August
20, 2010, 
the
Swedish Prosecutor’s Office 
issued
an arrest warrant
 for
Julian Assange

over
a rape allegation – 
two
weeks after the US Embassy met with the Pirate party and had concerns
over Assange leaking US secrets
.
The net day, Swedish cancelled the warrant.  “I
don’t think there is reason to suspect that he has committed rape,”
says one of Stockholm’s chief prosecutors, Eva Finne. Swedish
prosecutors did however continue to investigate a separate allegation
of molestation, though they felt it was not a serious enough crime
for an arrest warrant. 

On September
1, 2010, 
Swedish
Director of Prosecution, Marianne Ny, 
reopened
the rape investigation
 against
Assange.

On November
18, 2010, 
Stockholm
District Court approved a detention request for Mr. Assange, who had
traveled to London. Two days later, Swedish police issued an
international arrest warrant. 
On
December 8, 2010, Assange is taken into British custody and taken to
an extradition hearing
.
Eight days later, Assange posts bail and walks free in London
until 
May
30, 2012
 when
the UK Supreme Court rules that he should be extradited to Sweden. 

August
16, 2012, Assange begins his asylum at the Ecuadorian embassy in
London – where he has remained for over five years. 

In February,
2016, 
a
UN panel found Assange to be 
detained
unlawfully
 in the
Ecuadorian embassy.

asd

Julian
Assange holding UN decision

In May,
2017
,
Swedish authorities 
once
again dropped
 their
case against Julian Assange, with his Swedish lawyer Per Samuelsson
told Swedish media “It is a total victory for Julian
Assange,” adding “He is free to leave the embassy
whenever he wants.”

Unfortunately,
that’s not going to be quite so easy for the time being – as Assange
faces immediate arrest by the UK 
for
skipping bail in his extradition hearing. 
Moreover,
in April of this year, 
CNN and
the 
Washington
Post
 simultaneously
reported that 
Attorney
General Jeff Sessions’ DOJ has
 prepared
criminal charges against Assange over 2010 leaks of diplomatic
cables and military documents. 


While
the DOJ seems intent on locking Assange up, the WikiLeaks founder has
also received tremendous support from certain members of congress.


As
we 
reported
last week
,
Congressman Dana Rohrabacher travelled to London in August with
journalist Charles Johnson for a meeting with Assange, where
Rohrabacher said 
the
WikiLeaks founder offered “firsthand” information proving
that the Trump campaign did not collude with Russia, and which would
refute the Russian hacking theory
.


Rohrabacher
brought that message back to Trump’s Chief of Staff, John Kelly, to
propose a deal. In exchange for a presidential pardon, 
Assange
would share evidence that would refute the Russian hacking theory 
by
proving they weren’t the source of the emails, according to the 
WSJ


However
– when Trump was asked in late September about the Assange
proposal, 
he
responded that he’d “never heard” of it
,
causing Rohrabacher to unleash on John Kelly, who he blamed for
blocking the proposal from reaching the President. Rohrabacher
told the 
Daily
Caller

“I
think the president’s answer indicates that 
there
is a wall around him that is being created by people who do not want
to expose this fraud
 that
there was collusion between our intelligence community and the
leaders of the Democratic Party,” Rohrabacher told The Daily
Caller Tuesday in a phone interview.
 

This
would have to be a cooperative effort between his own staff and the
leadership in the intelligence communities to try to prevent the
president from making the decision as to whether or not he wants to
take the steps necessary to expose this horrendous lie that was
shoved down the American people’s throats
 so
incredibly earlier this year,” Rohrabacher said.

Contributing
to the notion of deep-state interference, CIA director Mike Pompeo
referred to WikiLeaks as a “
hostile
intelligence service

in April, calling Julian Assange “
a
fraud, a coward hiding behind a screen

for exposing information about democratic governments rather than
authoritarian regimes. This quite the ironic statement,
considering 
Pompeo used
leaked emails from WikiLeaks as proof “the fix was in”
against President Trump. 

So
– while the Swedish authorities have dropped their case against
Assange, and the UN says he’s been unlawfully detailed –
 the
UK insists on arresting Assange the moment he steps outside the
Ecuadorian embassy for jumping bail 
on
the dropped charges, 
and
the US Department of Justice is reportedly prepared to slap
criminal charges on Assange. 

Perhaps
the establishment is still a bit miffed that the “white
wizard” showed the world what’s really underneath the
pantsuit, which despite the constant rhetoric of the past year is
what ultimately cost Hillary – and so many of her charitable
friends – the election.

=============================

* Maakte een typefout in het klad: ‘aanklucht…’

Deze zaak maakt ten overvloede nog eens duidelijk dat juist de VS bezig is met het manipuleren van verkiezingen, iets waar dit ‘land’ Rusland, van durft te beschuldigen, zonder daar een nanometer bewijs voor te leveren……..

Zie ook:

Julian Assange gedemoniseerd door media die hem zouden moeten steunen, waren ze bevolkt geweest door echte journalisten……..

WikiLeaks toont aan dat VS en GB een gezamenlijke gewelddadige en bedrieglijke buitenlandpolitiek voeren

WhiteHouse: US, Ecuador Coordinating About Future Of Assange Asylum

De prijs op het hoofd van Julian Assange: 1 miljard dollar…..

Assange kan niet voor spionage worden vervolgd, immers hij is journalist >> aldus Daniel Ellsberg (Pentagon Papers) in een video

Assange is journalist en zou alleen daarom al niet mogen worden vervolgd, een artikel o.a. voor de huidige ‘journalisten’ van de reguliere media en de gebruikers van die media

WhiteHouse: US, Ecuador Coordinating About Future Of Assange Asylum‘ 

Stop de isolatie van Julian Assange!’

JulianAssange (Wikileaks) haalt hypocriete Britse regering onderuit voorwijzen op belang van vrije en onafhankelijke media