By Elizabeth Woodworth

July 04, 2020 “Information Clearing House” – The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services has recently “bought” all of Gilead Science’s Remdesivir for $1.6 billion. “500,000 doses at $3,200 per patient – to be available to American hospitals but not for other countries”[6]

That’s $1.6 billion tax dollars for a virtually untested drug showing only marginal efficacy in the hospital setting.

How could such a thing happen?

Introduction

If you believe an urgent call from the Yale School of Public Health that was recently published in the American Journal of Epidemiology— the top epidemiology journal in America — hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) + azithromycin is the quickest and most effective way to halt the Covid-19 pandemic.[1]

According to this Yale statement, hydroxychloroquine – a cheap, natural anti-malarial tree-bark known as quinine for 400 years – is highly effective during Phase 1 of Covid-19, while the virus is loading into the body.

As the first line of defense, it should be immediately, freely, and widely available to symptomatic high-risk patients – through doctors’ offices, outpatient clinics, and hospitals across the land.

Indeed, under the directorship of Dr. Anthony Fauci, a National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) a clinical trial had been launched on May 14 to look into it.[2]

The HCQ + azithromycin protocol is being used successfully by France’s top, award-winning microbiologist, Dr. Didier Raoult. He is director of the Infectious and Tropical Emergent Diseases Research Unit in Marseille (Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire) (IHU), with 200 staff.
Raoult, now almost a celebrity in France, has recently published his protocol and results, showing an overall 1.1% case fatality rate.[3]

The same protocol has also been highly successful in China, India, Senegal, and Brazil.[4]
So why suddenly is the U.S. government and the media ignoring recommendations from these top specialists,[5] and waiting, instead, until people get very sick and hospitalized to treat them with the relatively untested drug, Remdesivir, which is administered intravenously?

Why has the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) just bought up all the Remdesivir it could order – 500,000 doses at $3,200 per patient – to be available to American hospitals but not for other countries?[6]

To put Remdesivir’s cost in perspective, the CDC reports that the flu vaccine costs from $12-$18 a dose.[7]

The government, in order to justify its mind-boggling price, would need to show exceptional efficacy in saving lives. Efficacy, that is, once the disease has been allowed, through failure to use the HCQ + azithromycinearly preventive approach, to advance to Phase 2 (the dangerous inflammatory period) and Phase 3 (ICU ventilator intubation, often leading to death).[8]

What do studies say about the efficacy of remdesivir?

There are three main studies that have examined remdesivir as a treatment for Covid-19:

1. The first, a study of seriously ill patients, was originally reported in the New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) on April 10, 2020. Treated with “compassionate-use” remdesivir, clinical improvement was observed in 36 of 53 patients (68%).

The article was co-authored by 56 people, some of whom were on the staff of remdesivir’s producer, Gilead Sciences.[9] The study was funded by Gilead, and writing assistance was provided by David McNeel, also of Gilead.[10]

The following day, April 11, the Science Media Centre published expert reactions to the compassionate study from five British university professors. These assessments were not encouraging: “the research doesn’t prove anything at this point;” “the data is almost uninterpretable;” the research should be treated “with extreme caution.”[11]

2. A Wuhan, China randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 237 patients was accidentally leaked by the World Health Organization (WHO) and published in The Lancet. It showed no statistically significant clinical benefits from remdesivir:

“The antiviral medicine remdesivir from Gilead Sciences failed to speed the improvement of patients with Covid-19 or prevent them from dying, according to results from a long-awaited clinical trial conducted in China.” [12]

This Lancet study also found that some 14% of patients in the treatment group died after 28 days, compared to 13% in the group that did not receive the treatment.

And it further reported that “remdesivir was stopped early because of adverse events in 18 (12%) patients versus four (5%) patients who stopped placebo early.”[13]

3. The preliminary results of a NIAID remdesivir trial of 1063 patients showed a “modest” benefit in a controlled clinical trial:

“The infected people who received remdesivir, an experimental drug made by Gilead Sciences that cripples an enzyme several viruses use to copy their RNA, recovered in an average of 11 days versus 15 in patients who received a placebo. ‘Although a 31% improvement doesn’t seem like a knockout, 100% [success], it is a very important proof of concept,’ said Anthony Fauci, head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).”[14]

Health Policy Watch reported that “the death rate was 8% in the group that received remdesivir compared to 11.6% in the control group, although this result was not statistically significant.” Dr. Fauci told reporters that “what [this trial] has proven is that a drug can block the virus.”[15]

The excerpt below from a June 24 article in the British Medical Journal assesses the problems in the foregoing studies. (One of the four co-authors, Fiona Godlee, is the editor-in-chief of the British Medical Journal [BMJ]):

“A serious imbalance in covid-19 research strongly favours the study of drug treatments over non-drug interventions, with many studies too small or too weak to produce reliable results. Equally concerning is the release of partial or preliminary findings before peer review—often through commercial press releases—that is distorting public perceptions, ongoing evaluations efforts, and political responses to the pandemic.

Remdesivir is a key example. The antiviral drug, made by US company Gilead, was unapproved at the start of the pandemic, but in early April the New England Journal of Medicine published a small descriptive study of a compassionate use scheme for patients with covid-19. Gilead funded the study, a third of the authors were Gilead employees, and Gilead’s press release reported “clinical improvement in 68% of patients in this limited dataset.” Despite being a non-randomised, uncontrolled, company funded study of just 53 patients, media headlines described “hopeful” signs and reported “two thirds” of patients showing improvement.[16]

Two weeks later, the Lancet published a randomised placebo controlled trial of remdesivir from China, finding no statistically significant clinical benefit in the primary outcome of time to clinical improvement. Twelve per cent of participants taking remdesivir stopped treatment early because of adverse events, compared with 5% taking placebo. The trial was stopped before meeting recruitment targets.”[17]

To summarize, the only study demonstrating even marginal efficacy for remdesivir shows it to reduce hospital recovery times 31%, from 15 days to 11 days.

What is the justification for spending $3,200 tax dollars per Covid-19 patient to save four days in hospital, unless it is to shorten hospital stays, thereby saving the average U.S. bed cost of approximately $2000 per day, while delaying hospital saturation that could leave some people untreated to die?

Leaving people untreated to die could cause civil unrest, which may be the covert political reason for spending the $1.6 trillion.

None of the studies mention side effects of the drug. In the China study, kidney injury led to discontinuation for one patient, and in its use for ebola, liver risks were identified.[18]

How much does it cost to produce remdesivir?

The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) is a non-profit organization seeking to improve healthcare value through clinical and cost-effective analyses.[19]

In a May 1, 2020 study, the ICER calculated that the cost of producing the remdesivir “final finished product,” including the pharmaceutical ingredients, formulation, packaging, and a small profit margin, was $9.32 US for a 10-day course of treatment. They rounded this up to $10.[20]

Dr. Fauci’s NIAID Clinical Trial Evaluating Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin Closes Early

On June 20, 2020, nine days before the Department of Health and Human Services announced its $1.6 trillion purchase of remdesivir on June 29, its NIAID branch closed a clinical trial that had been launched May 14 to investigate whether the inexpensive combination, hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin, might be an effective treatment when given early in the course of the disease.[21]

The Department of Health and Human Services knew that hydroxychloroquine (aka chloroquine) was effective against coronavirus because chloroquine was tested against the SARS-1 virus during the outbreak in 2002. This work was written up in 2005, under the auspices of the U.S. Centers for Disease Control in Atlanta, which reports to the Department of Human Health and Services.[22]

Truth, as the saying goes, is stranger than fiction.

Who was responsible for this debacle?

Dr. Fauci has served in the National Institutes of Health under six presidents.

Were these bizarre decisions carried out under his authority? Or were they forced upon him from higher up? Or has he become a victim of regulatory capture[23] by the drug industry?
Whatever the answer, this unprecedented fleecing of the American public should have been shouted from the rooftops, had there been a functioning US media.

==================================
Zie ook:
‘GSK koopt belang in Duitse ontwikkelaar Coronavaccin CureVac, terwijl minister de Jonge waarschijnlijk alweer een bok heeft geschoten‘

‘Coronavirus spionage door Rusland: een beschuldiging zoals gewoonlijk zonder enig bewijs‘

‘De WHO is bijkans overgenomen door de grote farmaceuten; juist van groot belang door de Coronacrisis‘

‘COVID-19 testen op antilichamen van o.a. Roche, Quest en Abbott zijn waardeloos‘

‘Coronavirus: Fauci een autoriteit op virologisch gebied? Lees en zie dit!‘

‘Coronavirus: Indiase bevolking lijdt honger en gaat daarom zelfs bedreigde wilde dieren te lijf‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht, ouder dan de laatste hieronder weergegeven link)

‘Coronavirus: ‘hoera we mogen weer naar Engeland’, het land met in verhouding de meeste Coronadoden‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht, ouder dan de hieronder laatst getoonde)

‘Remdesivir: een amper werkend medicijn voor 1,6 miljard dollar: per patiënt $ 3,200.–, echte kosten $ 10.– per persoon……‘

‘Remdesivir, het middel tegen Ebola en ook tegen COVID-19 opgekocht door de Trump administratie: een zware misdaad‘

‘Spanje, Italië en anderen: EU ‘solidariteit’ i.v.m. de Coronacrisis alleen als het land zich tot de nek in de schulden wil steken: ‘DASLIEF’ of…..‘

‘Kabinet en regeringspartijen hebben geen behoefte om zorgverleners vanwege hun inzet op de Coronacrisis structureel meer te waarderen‘

‘KLM krijgt 3,4 milard euro voor vliegtuigoverlast, terwijl zorgmedewerkers kunnen barsten, een applausje vindt men in Rutte 3 voldoende‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht over de politieke leugens aangaande Schiphol, KLM en Lelystad Airport)

‘Pandemieën zijn het resultaat van natuurvernietiging, een waarschuwing van de VN, de WHO en het WWF‘

‘Corona-angst: psychologische oorlogsvoering tegen de bevolking‘

‘Duitse Verfassungsschutz vor Verschwörungstheorien waarschuwt geheel hypocriet voor Corona samenzweringstheorieën‘

‘Coronavirus: de sanitaire voorzieningen van campings per vandaag open: het hapsnapbeleid van de ‘Coronataskforce’‘

‘‘Mondkapjes per 1 juni verplicht in openbaar vervoer, ‘daar het Coronavirus zich op die datum zal richten op dat vervoer’‘

‘Nederland chanteert alweer Antilliaanse eilanden: nu voor hulp bij Coronacrisis‘

‘Coronasterfte verreweg het grootst onder ouderen met chronische kwalen: tijd voor een echte intelligente lockdown‘

‘Rinke van den Brink (NOS redacteur gezondheidszorg) over EU reactie op Coronavirus en loflied op Rutte en RIVM….‘ Een volkomen ten onrecht loflied (zie ook de links in dat bericht)

‘Rutte steekt vakkenvullers een riem onder het hart, da’s lief….. Deel 2‘ (humor)

‘Rutte die de vakkenvullers een hart onder de riem steekt en het tegelijk prima vindt dat ze zwaar worden onderbetaald, da’s lief…..‘ (dit is tevens het hele bericht)

‘Hugo de Jonge (CDA minister) wil ‘breakie breakie’ CDA voorzitter worden en vindt zijn Coronabeleid uitstekend‘

‘Rutte (VVD premier): ‘jongens we kunnen weer op vakantie’, ondanks het Coronavirus‘

‘Veel maatregelen tegen het Coronavirus vernietigen juist levens‘

‘Coronavirus: de sanitaire voorzieningen van campings per vandaag open: het hapsnapbeleid van de ‘Coronataskforce’‘

‘Zeg nee tegen de Corona spoedwet!‘ Een bericht met daaraan verbonden een petitie tegen die ‘nood-spoedwet’, lees en teken deze petitie ajb!)

‘Rutte 3 wil ongrondwettelijke noodmaatregelen legitimeren met spoedwet‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht naar meer zaken over aantasting van burgerrechten ‘in de strijd tegen het Coronavirus’)

‘‘Mondkapjes per 1 juni verplicht in openbaar vervoer, ‘daar het Coronavirus zich op die datum zal richten op dat vervoer’‘

‘Coronasterfte verreweg het grootst onder ouderen met chronische kwalen: tijd voor een echte intelligente lockdown‘

‘Leids college van B&W zet ongedocumenteerden op straat tijdens de Coronacrisis….. ‘DASLIEF……..’‘

‘Nederlandse Vereniging voor Kindergeneeskunde laat weten dat kinderen geen rol spelen in verspreiding van COVID-19‘

‘De NS wil de trein ‘nog aantrekkelijker maken voor de reiziger’: verbod op het meenemen van een fiets‘

‘Fooi van € 600,– voor flexwerkers ‘en studenten’: D66 is een inhumane neoliberale partij‘

‘Coronavirus: nog steeds gepruts door RIVM en de ten onrechte de hemel in geprezen Rutte‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)

‘Kajsa Ollongren (D66 minister) vindt het bevriezen van de huurprijs onwenselijk, terwijl huurders al extra worden gepakt………‘ (dit i.v.m. het Coronavirus)

‘Job Cohen (PvdA) prijst Rutte en zijn aanpak van de Coronacrisis…….. Een goed beleid? Lees dit!‘

‘Testen, testen, testen, ondanks de dappere woorden van Rutte wordt zelfs het personeel in verzorgingstehuizen waar Corona is vastgesteld niet getest‘

‘Coronavirus blunders: Nederland heeft bewust 600.000 ‘niet werkende’ mondkapjes aangeschaft‘

‘Broekers-Knol weigert jonge vluchtelingen uit Griekenland op te nemen, een zak geld zou voldoen………‘

‘Intensive care afdelingen zijn mede verantwoordelijk voor verspreiding van het Coronavirus‘

‘Emile Roemer (SP burgemeester Heerlen) vindt de hoogte van de Coronaboete terecht‘

‘Privacy en vrijheid van meningsuiting slachtoffer van het Coronavirus: neem de verplichte volg-app‘

‘Coronavirus: we worden behandeld als een kind met een tere ziel dat niet te veel mag weten‘

‘Coronavirus: Buma Cultuur wil alleen Nederlandse artiesten op de radiostations‘

‘Coronavirus: Rutte’s beleid krijgt steun van 8 op de 10 Nederlanders…….‘

‘Coronavirus-boete € 390,—….. Da’s lief……‘

‘Cornonavirus ‘taskforce’ heeft laten weten dat 80 plussers opname op een IC afdeling kunnen vergeten (‘da’s lief’)‘

‘Brekend Coronanieuws: eerste Nederlandse Coronapatiënten naar Duitsland‘ (vanwege tekort aan IC bedden….)

‘Coronavirus doden versus griep- en hongerdoden‘

‘Coronacrisis: afvalverwerkers hebben belang bij een zo groot mogelijke berg afval‘

‘Hugo de Jonge (CDA minister) & het Coronavirus, een drama ‘in wording‘

‘Coronavirus hapsnapbeleid Rutte 3 en RIVM‘

‘‘Samen tegen Corona, da’s lief’ of……‘

‘Coronavirus: RIVM adviezen en daarmee het regeringsbeleid van Rutte 3: onvoldoende en misleidend‘

‘Coronacrisis: de grootste internationale oefening ooit van politie, geheime diensten en de landstrijdkrachten‘

Voor (nog) meer berichten met/over het Coronavirus, dr. Fauci, Osterhaus en/of het RIVM, klik op het desbetreffende label, direct onder dit bericht.