Gisteren
schreef ik al een bericht over de nieuwe meer dan belachelijke
aantijgingen van de geheime diensten in de VS als zouden Rusland,
China, Iran, Venezuela en zelfs Hezbollah de verkiezingen in de VS
hebben gemanipuleerd of dat hebben geprobeerd en zoals gewoonlijk
zonder ook maar één nanometer aan bewijs……*
GlennGreenwald heeft een uitgebreid artikel over deze zaak gepubliceerd
op zijn site, waarin hij begint met het analyseren van de leugen gebracht door
geheime diensten en de reguliere (massa-) media in de VS over de het
lekken van gegevens afkomstig van de laptop van Hunter Biden, die in
handen kwam van de New York Post.
De
New York Post publiceerde documenten van deze laptop waaruit bleek
dat Hunter Biden en andere familieleden misbruik maakten van de naam
Joe Biden (die immers eerder vicepresident was onder
oorlogsmisdadiger Obama) om zaken te doen met Oekraïne, China en
andere landen.
Voormalige
hooggeplaatsten van de CIA en leden van andere geheime diensten in de
VS, stelden dat het om Russische desinformatie ging….. Twitter en
Facebook besloten daarop de New York Post de toegang tot hun platform
te ontzeggen……. John Brennan, CIA directeur onder Obama, heeft samen
met de al aangehaalde figuren uit de geheime diensten een brief opgesteld waarin
men stelde dat de zaak alle kenmerken had van Russische informatie
operaties….. Hoewel dezelfde figuren benadrukten dat ze niet
wisten of de gepubliceerde e-mails echt waren en dat ze geen bewijs
hadden van Russische manipulatie…… (moet je nagaan….)
Echter
deze toevoeging was voor de media die deze leugen brachten geen reden
om in te binden, integendeel men ging gewoon door en Facebook stelde
zelfs een algoritme in te zetten om berichtgeving over deze zaak
tegen te houden……. En dan te bedenken dat eerder een zogenaamde
Russische trollenfarm zich in de VS bevond, terwijl al lang bekend is
uit publikaties van de Wikileaks Vault 7
documenten dat de VS op grote schaal hackt en daarbij cyberterreur
begaat en spioneert maar dat op een slimme manier kan doen lijken alsof
bijvoorbeeld Rusland, China, Iran, of Noord Korea de dader is…….
Glenn
Greenwald, van The Intercept, die wel over deze zaak berichtte,werd
terechtgewezen door zijn meerderen die hem wilden dwingen om passages
over Biden weg te laten,waarop zijn artikel niet werd geplaatst
en Greenwald besloot The Intercept te verlaten.
Het
is zelfs zo zot dat een redacteur van de Washington Post stelde dat
‘we de Hunter Biden lekken moeten behandelen alsof ze van een
buitenlandse geheime dienst komen, zelfs als ze dat waarschijnlijk
niet zijn……’ (knettergek!!) De enige keer dat de regering van
de VS reageerde op deze zaak, middels de Director of National
Intelligence (DNI), stelde deze dat Bidens laptop geen deel uitmaakt van
een Russische desinformatie campagne……….
Ach
het is een herhaling van zetten in de Russiagate leugen, ook daarvoor
is totaal geen bewijs geleverd, echter men houdt gewoon driftig vol
dat dit wel zo is, overigens ook in de rest van het westen, waaronder
Nederland….. Gistermorgen op BNR rond 8.51 u. de meer dan belachelijke
‘buitenlanddeskundige’ Hammelburg, deze enorme flapdrol (letterlijk en
figuurlijk) sprak over de uitlating van Biden dat Putin een
moordenaar is. Daarbij noemde hij Sputnik de ‘roeptoeter van de
Russische overheid’, gelul >> op Sputnik wordt wel degelijk
kritiek geleverd op de overheid, maar zelfs als dat zo zou zijn, zie
de VS, waar niet 1 of 2 mediaorganen de overheid zouden dienen als
roeptoeter, maar een hele reeks, van de New York Times tot CNN en daarvoor is een dossierkast aan bewijzen te leveren…..
Volgens
Biden (en Hammelburg) is Putin een moordenaar als het gaat om Navalny…… Als Putin de neonazi Navalny had willen laten vermoorden was deze bewezen misdadiger al lang en
breed onder de zoden verdwenen, bovendien kan deze ploert niet zijn
vergiftigd met novitsjok daar hij dan dood zou zijn, immers een vergiftiging
daarmee is zonder meer dodelijk voor iedereen die er onbeschermd mee in aanraking
komt!!! Hammelburg durfde NB nog te stellen dat Putin ook een
moordenaar is vanwege het ontwikkelen in Rusland van biologische en
chemische wapens…… ha! ha! ha! ha! (vanmorgen herhaalde Hammelburg zijn leugens op BNR waar hij nu ook de Skripals aan toevoegde….)
Er
zijn 3 naties op de wereld die deze wapens vrij openlijk ontwikkelen
en dat zijn de VS (o.a. in Fort Detrick), Israël en Egypte….. In juli
2019 ontsnapte er ‘een virus’ uit één van de leger laboratoria van
Fort Detrick, waarop de basis werd ontruimd….. Een paar maanden
later vonden de militaire wereldspelen plaats in het Chinese Wuhan en
nog een paar maanden later werden de eerste gevallen van het
Coronavirus gevonden in Frankrijk, hoewel men dat toen nog niet wist,
een herbeoordeling van stalen bloed, afgenomen in november 2019
toonden aan dat deze mensen het… Coronavirus onder de leden
hadden…. Pas meer dan een maand laten, dus eind december 2019 werd
het eerste geval van Coronavirus ontdekt in China……… Ra ra hoe
is het allemaal mogelijk?? Intussen is zelfs bekend geworden dat het Coronavirus al eerder werd gevonden in later opnieuw beoordeelde bloedmonsters……
Uiteraard
herhaalde Hammelburg het verhaal van de geheime diensten in de VS
alsof Rusland, China, Iran e.a. de verkiezingen in de VS hadden
gemanipuleerd of daar een poging toe hadden ondernomen……. Zoals
Hammelburg nog steeds overtuigd is dat Russiagate bewezen is….. ha!
ha! ha! Ha! Deze mislukte zakkenwasser zou eens andere moeten
contacteren als hij weer eens een lulpraatje vertelt voor de radio!!
(hij gaf een aantal maanden gelden toe dat hij vrijwel altijd
‘deskundigen’ raadpleegt voor zijn columns en ander gekoekwaus……
Hé Hammelburg tijd voor echte deskundigen en eigen onderzoek,
waarbij je eens zou moeten zoeken of er bewijzen zijn voor wat je
durft te beweren, enorme hufter!!! (vorig jaar durfde hij mensen die
gebruik maken van de sociale media neer te zetten als kakkerlakken,
je weet wel zoals de nazi’s over minderheden spraken die ze het
liefst wilden uitroeien…….)
En
Hammelburg begin maar met het lezen van het artikel dat Glenn
Greenwald schreef, dan lees je eindelijk een artikel van een echte
deskundige!!
Journalists,
Illustrating How They Operate, Yesterday Spread a Significant Lie All
Over Twitter
Eager
to obtain vindication for the pre-election falsehood they spread
about the Hunter Biden story, journalists falsely claim that the CIA
blamed Russia for it.
Hunter
Biden (L) and then-Vice President Joe Biden speak on stage at
Organization of American States on April 12, 2016 in Washington, DC.
(Photo by Teresa Kroeger/Getty Images for World Food Program USA)
Journalists
with the largest
and most influential media outlets disseminated an outright and quite
significant lie on Tuesday to hundreds of thousands of people, if not
millions, on Twitter. While some of them were shamed into
acknowledging the falsity of their claim, many refused to, causing it
to continue to spread up until this very moment. It is well worth
examining how they function because this is how they deceive the
public again and again, and it is why public trust in their
pronouncements has justifiably
plummeted.
The
lie they told involved claims of Russian involvement in the
procurement of Hunter Biden’s laptop. In the weeks leading up to
the 2020 election, The
New York Post
obtained that laptop and published a series of articles about the
Biden family’s business dealings in Ukraine, China and elsewhere.
In response, Twitter banned
the posting of any links to that reporting and locked
The
Post
out
of its Twitter account for close to two weeks, while Facebook, though
a long-time Democratic operative, announced that it would
algorithmically suppress the reporting.
The
excuse used by those social media companies for censoring this
reporting was the same invoked
by media outlets
to justify their refusal to report the contents of these documents:
namely, that the materials were “Russian disinformation.” That
claim of “Russian disinformation” was concocted by a group of
several
dozen former CIA officials
and other operatives of the intelligence community devoted to
defeating Trump. Immediately after The
Post
published its first story about Hunter Biden’s business dealings in
Ukraine that traded on his influence with his father, these career
spies and propagandists, led by Obama CIA Director and serial liar
John Brennan, published a
letter
asserting that the appearance of these Biden documents “has all the
classic earmarks of a Russian information operation.”
News
outlets uncritically hyped this claim as fact even though these
security state operatives themselves admitted:
“We want to emphasize that we do not know if the emails…are
genuine or not and that we
do not have evidence of Russian involvement
— just that our experience makes us deeply suspicious that the
Russian government played a significant role in this case.” Even
though this claim came from trained liars who, with uncharacteristic
candor, acknowledged that they did not “have evidence” for their
claim, media outlets uncritically ratified this assertion.
This
was a topic I discussed extensively in October when I announced
my resignation from The
Intercept
after senior editors — for the first time in seven years —
violated the contractual prohibition on editorial interference in my
journalism by demanding I significantly alter my reporting about
these documents by removing the sections that reflected negatively on
Biden. What I found particularly galling about their pretense that
they have such high-level and rigorous editorial standards —
standards they claimed, for the first time ever, that my article
failed to meet — was that a mere week prior to their censorship of
my article, they published an
article by a different journalist
which, at a media outlet we created with the explicit purpose of
treating government claims with skepticism, instead
treated the CIA’s claims of “Russian disinformation” as fact.
Even
worse, when they quoted the CIA’s letter, they omitted the part
where even those intelligence agents acknowledged that they had no
evidence for their assertion. From The
Intercept
on October 21:
Their
latest falsehood once again involves Biden, Ukraine, and a laptop
mysteriously discovered in a computer repair shop and passed to the
New York Post, thanks to Trump crony Rudy Giuliani….. The U.S.
intelligence community had previously warned
the White House that Giuliani has been the target of a Russian
intelligence operation to disseminate disinformation about Biden, and
the FBI has been investigating whether the strange story about
the Biden laptop is part
of a Russian disinformation campaign.
This week, a group of former intelligence officials issued a letter
saying that the Giuliani laptop story has the classic
trademarks of
Russian disinformation.
Oh
my, marvel at those extremely rigorous editorial standards:
regurgitating serious accusations from ex-CIA operatives without
bothering to note that they were unaccompanied by evidence and that
even those agents admitted they had none. But, as they usually do
these days, The
Intercept
had plenty of company in the corporate media.
That
those materials were “Russian disinformation” became so
reflexively accepted by the U.S. media that it became the principal
excuse to ignore
and even censor the reporting, and it also helpfully handed the Biden
campaign an easy excuse to avoid answering any questions about what
the documents revealed. “I think we need to be very, very clear
that what he’s doing here is amplifying Russian
misinformation,” said Biden
Deputy Campaign Manager Kate Bedingfield when asked about the
prospect that Trump would raise the Biden emails at the debate. From
the CIA’s lips to the mouths of corporate journalists into the
hands of the Biden campaign.
As
the U.S. media disseminated this “disinformation” tale, nobody —
including the Bidens — has ever claimed let alone demonstrated that
a single document was anything other than genuine — something that
would be exceedingly easy to do if the documents were fraudulent.
“The Biden team has rejected some of the claims made in the NY
Post articles, but
has not disputed the authenticity of the [laptop] files upon which
they were based,” acknowledgedThe
New York Times.
Ample evidence corroborates
that the documents are genuine.
As
for the claims of Russian involvement in the laptop story, there was
never any evidence for it: none.
The CIA operatives who invented that storyline acknowledged that. The
week that tale emerged, The
New York Times reported that
“no concrete evidence has emerged that the laptop contains Russian
disinformation” and the paper said even the FBI has “acknowledged
that it had not found any Russian disinformation on the laptop.”
The
Washington Post
published an op-ed by Russia fanatic Thomas Rid who candidly
pronounced:
“We must treat the Hunter Biden leaks as if they were a foreign
intelligence operation — even if they probably aren’t.” And
the only time the U.S. Government has ever spoken on this question
was when the Director of National Intelligence stated:
“Hunter Biden’s laptop is not part of some Russian disinformation
campaign.”
These
documents raised important questions about the presidential
frontrunner’s knowledge of or participation in his family members’
attempt to profit off of their association with him, questions
implicating his integrity, ethics and honesty. Yet those documents
were suppressed by a gigantic fraud, perpetrated by the CIA and their
media allies, which claimed that the documents were forged and that
they came from Russia.
That
is the critical context
for the lie spread yesterday by numerous mainstream journalists. On
Tuesday morning, the Office of the Director of National Intelligence
declassified a short 12-page report
entitled “Foreign Threats to the U.S. 2020 Elections.”
It
reviewed the actions of numerous countries with regard to the 2020
election. The intelligence community claimed — without presenting
any evidence whatsoever — that “Russian President Putin
authorized…influence operations aimed at denigrating President
Biden’s candidacy and the Democratic Party, supporting former
President Trump, undermining public confidence in the electoral
process, and exacerbating sociopolitical divisions in the U.S.” The
New York Times’
largely credulous article
about this report contained this admission, one you would think (or,
rather, hope) would matter to journalists: “The declassified report
did not explain how the intelligence community had reached its
conclusions about Russian operations during the 2020 election.”
Despite
that glaring omission, media outlets predictably treated the
evidence-free assertions from the security state as fact. “Vladimir
Putin did it again,” trumpetedMother
Jones’ David
Corn without an iota of skepticism. CNN’s
Marshall Cohen actually said this:
The report confirms what was largely assumed, and barely hidden, last year: Trump and his allies publicly embraced Russia’s disinformation campaign against Biden, met with Kremlin-tied figures who were part of the effort, and promoted their conspiracies 
March 16th 2021
4,014 Retweets 9,220 Likes
Think
about that: to a CNN
reporter, evidence-free assertions from the U.S. security state are
tantamount to “confirmation.” That they really do think this way
is nothing short of chilling. But that is the standard liberal media
posture of harboring reverence for the U.S. intelligence community
and treating its every utterance as Truth without the need for any
corroborating evidence. It is one of their defining attributes.
But
in this case, many of them went far beyond mere regurgitation of CIA
claims. Well beyond it: here, they fabricated a claim that report
also demonstrated that the Hunter Biden laptop materials were — as
they claimed before the election engineered by Russia. In
reality, the report did not even mention the Hunter Biden laptop
materials or allude to it, let alone claim that it was produced by
the Kremlin, let alone supply evidence that it constituted “Russian
disinformation.” But no matter: numerous journalists united to
spread the false claim far and wide that the report confirmed this
storyline.
The
first journalist to publish the falsehood was Patrick Tucker, an
editor at the journal Defense
One.
The tweet quickly went viral as liberals clicked “retweet” and
“like” so fast that at least several of them likely suffered
digital cartilage damage or at least a mild sprain:
The
claim that this report corroborated Russian involvement in the Hunter
laptop story picked up significant steam when MSNBC
host Chris Hayes endorsed it to his 2.3 million followers:
From
there, the claim was further spread by Hayes’ NBC
News colleague
Ben Collins, who — ironically — works in what the network calls
the “disinformation unit,” combatting the spread of
disinformation (by which Collins means tattling on 4Chan teenagers
and Facebook boomers, while never challenging the lies of real power
centers such as those from the intelligence community; those lies are
ones he amplifies):
With
this MSNBC host and the NBC disinformation agent on board, it was off
to the races. Journalists from across the corporate media sphere
spread this lie over and over. Here was CNN’s
Asha Rangappa:
Perhaps
the most embarrassing example was from S.V. Daté, the White House
correspondent of HuffPost
which, just last week, had dozens of its reporters laid
off
perhaps because, while they have numerous talented reporters, this is
the sort of thing they routinely do, causing them to lose trust among
the public. Daté did not just repeat the lie but used it to mock
those who actually did the reporting on these documents (note that
the section he underlined in red says nothing about the Hunter Biden
documents, nor does it say anything about Russia other than it
“amplified” various news stories):
Hey, New York Post and everyone else who got suckered into the ridiculous Hunter Biden Laptop story.
Take a bow.
As
this false claim went massively viral, conservativejournalists
— and only
they
— began vocally objecting that the report made no mention
whatsoever of the Hunter Biden laptop, let alone supplied proof for
this claim. That is because, with a few noble exceptions (such as The
Washington Post’s
media critic ErikWemple),
liberal journalists at corporate outlets will eagerly endorse but
never denounce or correct each other’s falsehoods. For that reason,
if you confine yourself to the liberal corporate media bubble, and
refuse to follow conservative journalists as well, you will be
propagandized and deceived.
Hayes,
to his credit, was one of the only journalists who helped spread this
falsehood and then quickly retracted it. He first acknowledged that,
upon reading the report, it did not appear that it actually made any
reference to the Hunter laptop, and then announced he would delete
his original tweet, conceding that the original claim was false. Note
how the original false claims go mega-viral, while the tweets which
subsequently acknowledge their falsity are seen by very few people:
With
one of his earliest boosters having jumped ship, Tucker himself, the
originator of this lie, first began backtracking while vowing he
would never delete the tweet, only to then relent and delete it,
acknowledging its falsity. Again compare the meager audience that
learns of the backtracking and acknowledgment of falsity compared to
the huge number exposed to the original false claim:
I’ve deleted a tweet that suggested that a recent ODNI report made explicit reference to the Hunter Biden laptop story. It makes reference to Andrii Derkach, a pro-Russian Ukrainian politician who was trafficking information remarkably similar to what showed up in the Post report
March 16th 2021
Thanks
to multiple journalists with large platforms spreading Tucker’s
original false tweet, it received thousands upon thousands of likes
and re-tweets. So, too, did the tweets of other journalists that
false claim, such as the one from HuffPost’s
White House Correspondent and this one from one of David
Brock’s goons
specifically claiming that the security state’s evidence-free
report somehow proves that my pre-election reporting on it was wrong.
Yet Tucker’s announcement that he was deleting his tweet on the
ground that the report does not make “explicit reference to the
Hunter Biden laptop story” has a grand total of three
retweets.
Indeed,
other than Hayes, it is difficult to find a journalist who
acknowledged that what they spread was a lie. Both CNN’s
Rangappa and NBC
News’
Collins simply allowed the tweet to quietly disappear from their
timeline when Tucker finally deleted his, saying nothing to the
thousands or tens of thousands of people they misled. Meanwhile, the
tweet from HuffPost’s
Daté is still
up
a full twenty-four hours after the key journalists who spread this
have acknowledged it was false.
Do
you see how
they behave? Take a look. Prior to the election, out of desperation
to ensure that Biden won, they censored and maligned this reporting
by mindlessly endorsing an assertion from life-long CIA operatives
that never had any evidence: ignore
these documents; they are Russian disinformation. They
not only invoked that claim to justify ignoring the story but also to
successfully agitate for its censorship by Twitter and Facebook. So
they spent weeks spreading an utter lie in order to help the
candidate that they favored win the election. Remember, these are
journalists
doing
that.
Then,
yesterday, the intelligence community issued a report that does not
even purport to contain any evidence: just assertions. And they all
jumped to treat it as gospel: no questioning of it, no skepticism, no
demands to see evidence for it, not even any notation that no
evidence was provided. They just instantly enshrined claims from the
CIA and NSA as Truth. How can you possibly be a journalist with even
minimal knowledge of what these agencies do and look in the mirror as
you do this?
But
so much worse, in this case, they just outright lied about what the
report said — just fabricated assertions that the report did not
even allude to, in order to declare their lies from last October to
be vindicated. Even if this report had asserted that the Hunter Biden
laptop materials were manufactured by the Kremlin, that
would prove nothing.
Evidence-free assertions from the U.S. intelligence community merit
skepticism, not blind faith — especially from people calling
themselves journalists.
But
the report did not even claim that. And when some of them realized
this, they did virtually nothing to rectify the severe disinformation
they had spent the day spreading. These are the people who claim to
be so profoundly opposed to conspiracy theories and devoted to
combating “disinformation”; as usual, they are the ones who
spread disinformation most recklessly and frequently.
The
fact that the false tweet from HuffPost’s
White House correspondent is still up is quite revealing, given that
that outlet just had to lay off a significant portion of its staff.
As newly arrived Substack writer Michael Tracey wrote in his
first article
on this platform (headlined: “Why Journalists Hate Substack”),
journalists are very good at lamenting when their outlets are forced
to lay off journalists but very poor at examining whether the content
their outlet is producing may be part of why it is failing:
So
when you see another round of layoffs, followed by another round of
exasperated Twitter lamentation about how horrible the industry is,
you have to wonder if these rituals ultimately function as an excuse
for journalists to forgo any kind of real self-examination. For
instance, why it is that the media organizations they inhabit always
seem to be in a constant state of free-fall? Sure, there are economic
factors at play that the journalists themselves cannot control. But
it would seem to behoove these journalists to maybe spend a little
bit less time complaining in the abstract about the depredations of
“the industry”—as though they are its hapless, beleaguered
casualties—and a little bit more time analyzing whether they have
contributed to the indisputable reality that huge cross-sections of
the public distrust
and despise the
media.
There
are multiple potential explanations for this dynamic worth
considering. Maybe it’s the tedious
hyper-partisanship and
weirdly outdated content
aggregation tactics
that much of the online media still employs. Maybe it’s the
constant five-alarm-fire
tone and incessant hyping of overblown threats that
was characteristic of the Trump years. Maybe it’s some combination
of all these and more—but you won’t see many axed journalists
offering up any kind of critical introspection, because when the
layoffs arrive it can never have anything to do with their own
ideological myopia or other shortcomings.
Indeed,
when anyone, including journalists, loses their job, it is
lamentable. But when one witnesses behavior like what these
journalists did yesterday, the only confounding part of the collapse
of this part of the media industry is that it is not happening
even more quickly and severely.
©
2021 Glenn Greenwald
548
Market Street PMB 72296, San Francisco, CA 94104
==============================================
Zie ook: ‘D66 wil EU lidmaatschap in grondwet verankeren, ‘maar echt niet om te voorkomen dat Nederland uit de EU kan stappen’‘ (ben ik gvd vergeten voor de verkiezingen van 2021 te melden als uiterst negatief punt als je op die partij zou stemmen…. Je bent een sukkel Azijnpisser!)
‘Feit of fictie: de grote Corona reset samenzweringstheorie‘
‘LIMC
(leger) nu pas door minister van Defensie Bijleveld op non actief
gesteld, na ernstige inbreuk op privacy en schending mensenrechten‘ (het leger dat ongeoorloofd computers van burgers hackt zogenaamd in het
kader van valse info over het Coronavirus; zowel deze als ook de
volgende 2 links hebben daarbij alles met manipulatie te maken)
‘LIMC (landmacht) gaat haar boek wel heel ver te buiten, misdadig en mensenrechtenschendend ver!!‘
‘Britse leger bezig met o.a. cyber-operaties in burgerleven met het Coronavirus als ‘legitimatie’‘
‘Russiagate: Trump heeft in zijn laatste dagen als president alle geheime FBI documenten over die leugen vrijgegeven‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht, voor een groot deel anders dan de hier weergegeven links)
”Russiagate was een middel om de Koude Oorlog tegen Rusland te doen herleven‘
‘Putin vraagt en Trump levert: een lijst met ‘alle goede zaken die Trump voor Rusland regelde’‘
‘Russiagate: nog overtuigd van bestaan daarvan? Lees dit!‘ (!!!!) (en zie de links in dat bericht)
‘Julian Assanges vervolging is de genadeklap voor klokkenluiders en (echte) journalisten‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)
‘Bedrijf dat voor ‘Russische bots’ waarschuwde, heeft een leger met nep-Russische bots‘ (Lezen mensen!!!!)
‘Met Joe Biden is er niets veranderd op de wereld, anders dan dat ‘het Trump fascisme is weggestemd‘
‘Trumps kruistocht tegen Huawei waar GB in de G5 val van de VS is getrapt‘ (en zie de links in dat bericht)
‘Coronavirus spionage door Rusland: een beschuldiging zoals gewoonlijk zonder enig bewijs‘
‘Duitsland roept Russische ambassadeur op ‘het matje’ vanwege vermeend hacken van Duits parlement‘
‘Het meest gecensureerde nieuws van deze eeuw: het proces tegen journalist Julian Assange‘
(en zie de links in dat bericht met meer artikelen over Assange en
Chelsea Manning, die o.a. met info kwamen dat de VS op grote schaal
spioneert)
”Geheime diensten in westen geven toe dat spioneren via het G5 netwerk praktisch onmogelijk is……..‘ (!!!!)
‘Amazon heeft lak aan privacy en werkt mee aan natiegroot ‘veiligheidsnetwerk’ in de VS‘
‘Niet Rusland maar Trump beïnvloedt nu al de verkiezingen in Groot-Brittannië‘
‘Bram van Ojik, de Trump van ‘GroenLinks’, wenst geen zaken te doen met Huawei…… OEI!!!‘
‘Avaaz valt met fake news en desinformatie ‘fake news en desinformatie‘ aan……’ (zie in dat bericht ook de link naar een ander artikel met een smerige rol van Avaaz)
‘Rob Jetten (D66 fractievoorzitter) liegt een fikse slag in de rondte in EU verkiezingspraatje‘
‘New York Times ‘bewijzen’ voor Russiagate vallen door de mand……‘
‘Politico rapport bevestigt: Russiagate is een hoax‘
‘Russiagate sprookje ondermijnt VS democratie en de midterm verkiezingen‘
‘Robert Mueller lijdt aan dementie en maakt van Russiagate een nog belachelijker verhaal‘
‘Putin vraagt en Trump levert: een lijst met ‘alle goede zaken die Trump voor Rusland regelde’‘
‘Russiagate? Britaingate zal je bedoelen!‘
‘FBI, de spin in het Russiagate web……..‘
‘‘Russiagate’ een complot van CIA, FBI, Hillary Clinton en het DNC………..‘
‘‘Russiagate’ een verhaal van a t/m z westers ‘fake news…..’‘
‘The Attack on ‘Fake News’ Is Really an Attack on Alternative Media‘
‘Facebook gebruikte ‘fake news’ beschuldiging om de aandacht voor schandalen af te leiden‘
‘Why the Coordinated Alternative Media Purge Should Terrify Everyone‘
‘Facebook (en Twitter) onderdrukt meningsvorming door het verwijderen van (echt) onafhankelijke media‘
‘Wie het nieuws controleert, controleert de wereld……‘ (over manipulatie gesproken……)
‘Facebook wil samen met door Saoedi-Arabië gesubsidieerde denktank censureren…. ha! ha! ha! ha! ha!‘
Facebook Purges Independent Media for “Political Disinformation”
Facebook Blocks Links to Free Speech Competitor ‘Minds’
Laatste update op 3 april 2021. (o.a. de passage over de Wikileaks Vault 7 documenten)
8.50 pm . Sept 22, 2020, 
